/cgl/ - Post oldskool /cgl/!

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)12:24
No.6425581

File: 1353259474478.jpg-(526 KB, 1280x3880, 1314266141475.jpg)

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)12:24 No.6425581

Post oldskool /cgl/!

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)12:28
No.6425592

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)12:28 No.6425592

>>6425581 (OP)
Jesus, it's kinda shocking how little this place has changed in almost 6 years.

Except that having a thread with that many anons is a distant dream now.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)12:35
No.6425609

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)12:35 No.6425609

>>6425599
...huh?

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:14
No.6425687

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:14 No.6425687

Replies: >>6425696

File: 1353262462283.png-(44 KB, 1221x166, BFBP.png)

>>6425581 (OP)
>epic fail
>epic lulz
>n00ds
>waaambulance

Well, I'm glad some things went out of style.
I don't have any really old /cgl/ specific ones, but I do have a few that I took last year.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:16
No.6425696

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:16 No.6425696

Replies: >>6425774

>>6425687
Pretty sure the use of those was ironic, even then.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:18
No.6425700

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:18 No.6425700

Replies: >>6425741 >>6425746

oldskool /cgl used to be a bunch of fat and ugly
cosplayr/lolita living in their own bubbles and self-deluded world. Pathetic.

Glad some better looking cosplayers and ironically some trolls knocked some sense into them.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:33
No.6425741

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:33 No.6425741

Replies: >>6425747

>>6425700
At least old school /cgl/ enjoyed itself and made jokes instead of off-topic pieces of shit threads.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:35
No.6425746

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:35 No.6425746

>>6425700
Pfft, fairly sure there was about the same ratio of ugly to attractive. Just a bit less personal attention-whoring.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:35
No.6425747

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:35 No.6425747

Replies: >>6425771

>>6425741
old cgl had much more offtopic threads

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:37
No.6425752

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:37 No.6425752

Ahhhhhhhhh, before 4chan found out we were woman. Good times, good times.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:44
No.6425771

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:44 No.6425771

>>6425747
Your basis for this?

What it certainly had was floods. All the fucking time.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:46
No.6425774

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:46 No.6425774

Replies: >>6425777

>>6425696
At least in the case of 'n00dz' I can categorically tell you it was ironic. I know because I posted it.

People were still using 'epic fail' quite sincerely then, though.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:47
No.6425777

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:47 No.6425777

>>6425774
Okay, I thought the n00dz bit was ironic, but I couldn't be certain. 2007 was a scary time.

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:58
No.6425800

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:58 No.6425800

Anyone got anything older than this?

Anonymous
11/18/12(Sun)13:59
No.6425806

Anonymous 11/18/12(Sun)13:59 No.6425806

Has anyone else been here long enough to remember when 4chan didn't even have cgl yet?

The next 4chan Q&A/PMQ session will be held on Sunday, November 18th at 8:00PM EST.I'm also taking questions/comments/feedback/random musings via e-mail at moot@4chan.org and on AIM at MOOTCHAT. Feel free to drop me a line or say hi!

The next 4chan Q&A/PMQ session will be held on Sunday, November 18th at 8:00PM EST.

I'm also taking questions/comments/feedback/random musings via e-mail at moot@4chan.org and on AIM at MOOTCHAT. Feel free to drop me a line or say hi!