>> |
12/12/11(Mon)09:25 No.5236073>>5234488
As
a goth, allow me to have my input on this. Goth and Punk subcultures
started out with music and the fashion, stereotypes, ext all evolved
from it. General people who liked "goth" music found other things they
had in common, be it literature, black clothing and so on. Thus how the
Gothic subculture was born. Punk was born in a similar way.
When
punk and goth reached Japan, there was a general rebel movement which
put a spin on it from which lolita was born. The difference between the
evolution of lolita and let's say, goth, is that lolita STARTED as a
fashion, and then started to have "accessories" such as literature,
music, media, ext., born from the commonalities found between different
people who wore lolita.
In my opinion, to begin with, lolita was
not a culture. However, there ARE some lolita musicians now, there are
many musicians whose music is generally listened to by lolitas (at least
in my comm) and we have our stereotypes and our defining factors. So,
lolita has evolved from merely a fashion into a subculture, at least in
my eyes. If not, it's well on it's way.
As for the ageplay
fetish people assume we all have... -deep sigh- I have met COUNTLESS
people who have assumed because I am a "goth" that I am into BDSM and
"kinky" sex. People will always make their judgments based off of what
you are wearing. These people don't have the brain cells to think that
maybe there is more to you as a person than the clothes you wear or the
music you listen to. I'm personally a demi-sexual Christian who is
engaged to my boyfriend of 4 years, and I'm starting to question if I am
asexual or not.
The point is, haters gonna hate. If they can
take clothes made to cover up the body and use it instead to judge the
opposite, they probably would do that to anyone. |