>>
!!BvH0j6gtcGI 11/22/11(Tue)02:14 No. 5171141 >>5171097 Okay,
I'm not familiar with the whole story, but from what I understand, some
people have dealt with this girl on a personal level (I assume she's
under the age of 18? If not, all of this is moot.) and what they read on
her deviantart. Now, the story is that father has previously abused her
in the past (is there any solid proof other than he-said/she-said?)
Physical indications of abuse in the form of photographs, possible
hospital visits, school? If that were the case, those professionals are
mandated reporters. Threatening child abuse is more difficult to prove
and would be more valid if the claim was made directly by the child to
local authorities rather than a general reporter as sucky as that may
be. Again, I'm referring to VA law which I'm not familiar with. If the
information provided was good enough (such as an address, phone number,
age, names of the people involved), they should have sent someone over,
but forget about knowing if they did or not because CPS won't tell you
that they did and this girl could essentially be lying about their
involvement, or they simply didn't think it was a valid claim. Another
claim I'm seeing is that she lives in a dirty house. You would be
surprised the amount of times I've been in a house that I deemed as
essentially dirty, and the agency wouldn't consider it deplorable
housing. Nastiness to you and I can mean one time, and something
completely different to another person. As long as there are working
utilities, food in the fridge, four walls, roof and a bed for the child
and there isn't literally a mountain of human and non-human shit piling
up all over the place, it's adequate. I've walked in on a house with at
least 30 cats, and the smell, swear to God, singed the fucking hair out
of my nose, it was that potent, and it wasn't considered deplorable. con't