>> |
!!IB1pZcmTQv/ 10/11/11(Tue)15:29 No.5054527 File1318361382.jpg-(34 KB, 571x317, iaintevenmad.jpg)
>>5054491 I have a girlfriend and am in a happy relationship. What
I am, in regards to this whole debate, is a person who believes people
of either gender shouldn't be told that what is "in their nature", like
being whores (in your opinion, by the way, what exactly IS a whore? A
girl who's slept with more than one guy in her lifetime?), is the ONLY
way they should act, and if they try to go against it by following
society's norms in regards to sexual behavior, then they're just lying
to themselves and are worse.
In your opinion, would it be better
if women (and men, too, cause that would have to be the case) were
evolutionarily reverted to the point where reproduction is the only
thing on their minds, and then all women would be useful for anymore is
popping out babies of men they don't know? Or would it be better if
women remained virginal and ignorant about sex until they're married?
Realize,
good sir, that you are both contradicting yourself and digging a deeper
hole for your argument (which was what, exactly?). Men can be whores
too, with both genders.
And I sincerely ask that you do not
insult me when I'm trying to respond to your questions, as that does not
facilitate a good debate - it instead reveals that it is one person
shouting misguided beliefs to a crowd and believing he is right and
everyone is wrong. |