what the shit is a slutwalk

>>4923418
anti-rape/victim blaming shit.

>>4923420
i swear to god, nobody represents women worse than feminists.

>>4923420

Fucking femanons....

Does anyone have that photo of a woman topless holding a sign that says "I protest" ?

pic unrelated

Women these days don't have a sense of shame at all. No wonder white men are sick of white women. lol.

A finite-state machine (FSM) or finite-state automaton (plural: automata), or simply a state machine, is a behavioral model used to design computer programs. It is composed of a finite number of states associated to transitions. A transition is a set of actions that starts from one state and ends in another (or the same) state. A transition is started by a trigger, and a trigger can be an event or a condition.

Finite-state machines can solve a large number of problems, among which are electronic design automation, communication protocol design, parsing and other engineering applications. In biology and artificial intelligence research, state machines or hierarchies of state machines are sometimes used to describe neurological systems and in linguistics—to describe the grammars of natural languages.

In accordance with the general classification, the following formal definitions are found:

A deterministic finite state machine or acceptor deterministic finite state machine is a quintuple (Σ,S,s0,δ,F), where:
Σ is the input alphabet (a finite, non-empty set of symbols).
S is a finite, non-empty set of states.
s0 is an initial state, an element of S.
δ is the state-transition function: \delta: S \times \Sigma \rightarrow S (in a nondeterministic finite state machine it would be \delta: S \times \Sigma \rightarrow \mathcal{P}(S), i.e., δ would return a set of states).
F is the set of final states, a (possibly empty) subset of S.

An EFSM is defined[2] as a 7-tuple M = (I,O,S,D,F,U,T) where

S is a set of symbolic states,
I is a set of input symbols,
O is a set of output symbols,
D is an n-dimensional linear space D_1 \times \ldots \times D_n,
F is a set of enabling functions f_i : D \rightarrow \{0,1\},
U is a set of update functions u_i : D \rightarrow D,
T is a transition relation, T : S \times F \times I \rightarrow S \times U \times O

There exist three equivalent major definitions for the concept of a recursively enumerable language.

A recursively enumerable formal language is a recursively enumerable subset in the set of all possible words over the alphabet of the language.
A recursively enumerable language is a formal language for which there exists a Turing machine (or other computable function) which will enumerate all valid strings of the language. Note that, if the language is infinite, the enumerating algorithm provided can be chosen so that it avoids repetitions, since we can test whether the string produced for number n is "already" produced for a number which is less than n. If it already is produced, use the output for input n+1 instead (recursively), but again, test whether it is "new".
A recursively enumerable language is a formal language for which there exists a Turing machine (or other computable function) that will halt and accept when presented with any string in the language as input but may either halt and reject or loop forever when presented with a string not in the language. Contrast this to recursive languages, which require that the Turing machine halts in all cases.

All regular, context-free, context-sensitive and recursive languages are recursively enumerable.

Post's theorem shows that RE, together with its complement co-RE, correspond to the first level of the arithmetical hierarchy.

What with this shit.

I lurk here for pretty dresses.