>> |
04/29/11(Fri)04:23 No.4401888>>4401873 Except
for, they do. By hosting a convention, by hosting a site, from which
they acquire profit from, they do have an obligation to answer to their
clientele, regardless of whether they agree or not, in a satisfactory,
non-sarcastic, non-degrading manner.
I think it's a big deal
consider many reporters from various websites have stated they are
pulling out of PAX coverage over this issue.
I have no problems
if you disagree with what I'm saying, as I'm not the original anon who
commented that PAX can go fuck itself. I am, however, a bit miffled that
Mike and Jerry ostracized and acerbated a situation that could've been
handled a lot better, and are a telling a large chunk of their fanbase,
who found issues with their humor, to deal with it, while complaining
that it's not fair they're getting backlash, even though *they* caused
the backlash, by being reactionary, indifferent, and insensitive.
Whether
people want to go or not want to go PAX is their problem. But no, I
disagree with your comment about this being a non-issue; it is an issue,
which is why this has gone on for almost half a year now. |