| >> |
!fC3GORJchA
06/16/10(Wed)23:21 No.3118084>>3118005
She
made a contrived point with no basis, congratulations for being as dumb
as her for thinking what she said held value.
>>3118030
I was
replying to a post, if you click the quote you will see it, then you
will understand the context of what I was saying and why it is such a
pathetically stupid argument.
If your parents fall for that
shit, they are stupid. You likely don't have the self confidence needed
to show off that much skill, so what kind of a threat is it to have you
say "I WILL WEAR MINISKIRTS IF YOU DONT!"
Plus they buy your
damn clothing in the first place, how the fuck are you going to get
miniskirts anyway?
Your threat and logic is invalid.
>>3118044
Post a
photograph then. If you weren't lying on the good looking and not fat
count, I will believe the rest.
>>3118048
Every
con photo I have seen of a lolita has been some hambeast. Most of the
ones I see on the streets are hambeasts. Most of the ones in the
critique threads are hambeasts. Do you really think that my logic of
thinking you are all hambeasts is so flawed if this is the evidence I am
presented?
And no Asian whore number 34 doesn't count in this
conversation. Photoshop is remarkable. I know, It makes me look good.
>>3118051
I rarely
call people fat, I call people hambeasts. And no one has posted a photo
to disprove me, ever.
Seriously, I rarely call people fat. I
call things fat, like lolitas, but generally speaking I rarely call
people fat without seeing them. I take guesses and say you are prolly
fat sometimes, but don't outright say it. And no one has proved me wrong
with a picture, ever. You are likely just some butthurt kid from the
fashion thread who is angry I didn't like your hat with ears or silly
belt. |
