Woman here. Pulling a move like that only works if you aren't ugly and you won't be in the friends zone if you are good looking, so it's a catch 22. Sorry.
Should have been more obvious to begin with.

>>2561953
Did you say woman? By the sound of it you meant "liar".

Been friendzoned one too many times, OP?

>>2561942
tl;dr - So it's important for a dude to spout a canned exit, regardless of the circumstances, whether or not the girl is being sincere, for a chance of convincing a girl to agree to pity sex.

You can't force a girl to act like a tsundere if she isn't a tsundere, bro. There are plenty of girls that are worth having a friendship with, and there is often times the chance for friends to get a crush on each other as time progresses. It has happened before, it will happen again.

Sex is human nature and not only feels good, but if you're a decent enough guy with some balls then you can succeed with women without being a tool or a strange nerd-PUA hybird.

>So you've all wasted time chasing a girl who wouldn't give you shot right?
Nope
*leaves thread*

When guys friend me with hopes of being in the "fuck zone", it pisses me off. I get along better with guys, so I genuinely want male FRIENDS. I'm usually the pursuer in most instances since males find me intimidating.

If someone I thought was a close friend pulled that shit on me, I'd be beyond upset and pissed off. *I* wanted you for friendship. If that's not good enough for you, get the fuck out of my life. If I'm interested in you in that way, you'll know.

>>2561959
>decent enough guy with some balls

Exactly what OP is talking about. Having the balls to walk away from a dead end.

>>2561963
I'm talking about "You win some, you lose some." as a general rule of the dating process, but how many women does one prepare to go through? Do you know what are you looking for in a woman, or are you just looking to get inside a woman? Wouldn't you rather copulate with someone who reciprocates your desires?

>>2561956

>>2561961
You have a vagina and are attractive?
Males wont want to ever be your friend, unless there gay, or already have someone that fucks them.

>>2561980

Well this is incredibly discouraging. Either having to deal with crazy bitches or dudes trying to get in my pants?

Still think I choose dudes.

>>2561980
Jesus christ you live in a fucked up, depressing fantasy world.

What man hurt you that you have such a low opinion of them?

>>2561984
Good pick, telling interesting people that you dont wana fuck them is better than having to deal with BITCHES AND WHORES. ugh...

>>2561980

Or unless said male is already in a relationship

>there instead of they're

You illiterate fuck

Yeah, its a great... no.
If I'd done this, I would have missed out on one of my best friends. There are other fish in the sea dude, rejection hurts but good friends can help a lot towards getting over it.

>>2561942

Another unsociable neckbeard found his way to /cgl/ again

>>2561986
>implying i'm a woman
>>2561987
OH DEAR LORD, A TYPO ON THE INTERNET, BRB GOING TO KILL MYSELF IN SHAME

>>2561980
Not true.

>>2561961

it's not a headgame. some guys would say that, mean it, and kick themselves out of your life.

>>2561996
So your dad beat you? Or what?

>>2561980

Most attractive girls (at least a 6) I know are giant fucking gaiaonline posting Hetalia cock sucking weeaboos. Why should I be their friend?

>>2562004
Then why would you want to date them either? If they annoy you that much it'll only get worse.

If all you want is easy sex without anything else head to nightclubs.

>>2562009
>Implying I said anything about wanting to date them

Go back and read my post again

>>2562012

>If all you want is easy sex without anything else head to nightclubs.
Why spend the effort on them then? You could get laid for the price of a drink, if that's all you're after.

ITT: Women deny they're nothing but (attention) whores despite OP shining a light that proves them horribly wrong.

>>2562016
Because you could do it with not a hooker for free. You could fuck that conquest girl. You could unfriendzone yourself and build a romantic relationship.

You personally could nut up and stop being a pussy.

>>2562016

Effort to do what? I think you're replying to the wrong post

>>2562018
But >>2562012 said he isn't interested in a relationship, he just wants sex, so if that's all hes after there are plenty of girls he could get it from.

>>2562018
and it would be fucking unsuccessful because you should not have to trick a girl into being with you. ALSO, COSPLAY.

>>2561942
>>2562017
>butthurt OP, always the friend, never the boyfriend

>>2562017
ITT: faggotry.

>>2562016
>Implying I said anything about wanting to do anything at all with them

No seriously, just read my post before you make a post

>>2562022

No I didn't you twat, don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say I wanted to have sex with them let alone associate with them.

>>2562027
>>2562026
>>2562022
>>2562016
>>2562012
>>2562009

Reading comprehension at it's finest

>>2562027
...You need to ramp up your reading comprehension and learn to post things that fit the context of a conversation then, retard.

>>2562030

Read my post, where did I state anything saying I wanted to fuck or date them ?

>Most attractive girls (at least a 6) I know are giant fucking gaiaonline posting Hetalia cock sucking weeaboos. Why should I be their friend?

>>2562030
>ramp up your Reading Comprehension
>Reading Comprehension

I think you mean writing/typing comprehension, you need to work on your word choice.

>>2562035
WHO CARES, SHUT UP YOU ARE AN OFF TOPIC FAGGOT GO AWAY

>>2562039
>Implying this thread is worth staying on topic for

>>2562035
The TOPIC OF THE THREAD YOU ARE POSTING IN, and THE SUBJECT OF THE POST YOU WERE REPLYING TO, was ABOUT SEX.

>>2562023
Trick the girl? It's the exact opposite, it's making yourself perfectly clear with the girl. You tell her you don't want to be just her friend. Then you look for a girl who will be more than a friend because it is the man's honest want.

Tricking a girl would be becoming her manslave emotinal sponge and claiming you "don't have those feelings as well" while attempting to sabotage every relationship she begins because "one day...".

Why do I feel like I'm responding to some "empowered" dits of a woman?

>>2562037
>writing/typing comprehension

What? That isn't even a thing...And how does reading comprehension not make sense? He managed to have the entire point of a thread BLOW over his head. I'd say that's a lack of basic reading comprehension skills if ANYTHING is.

>>2562044
>Males wont want to ever be your friend.

Not directly about sex

>>2562044

It doesn't mean my response has to be about sex, there's more than one reason why someone wouldn't want to be someone's friend

>>2562048

You still worded that sentence awkwardly. The way you worded it with that grammar implied he had to ramp up his reading comprehension in order to write better..

>>2562049
>YOU GUYS SHOULD MAN UP AND FUCK CHICKS THAT PUT YOU IN THE "FRIEND ZONE"

>That's bullshit, I have many male friends, I would be disgusted if those were those intentions.

>IF YOU ARE A CHICK GUYS ONLY WANT TO GET THEIR DICK WET IN YOUR PUSSY

>HERP DERP TOTALLY. ALL THE HOT CHICKS I KNOW ARE GAIAFAGS. WHY WOULD I WANT TO BEFRIEND THAT

The implications in that post, seeing as it was in response to one talking about the value of women in terms of FUCKING and FRIENDSHIP, is that the women in your life, being worthless in regards to the latter, are only kept around for the former.

>>2562055
"And," while occasionally used to mean "consequently," more often (and in this case, more logically) means "additionally."

>>2562062
>IF YOU ARE A CHICK GUYS ONLY WANT TO GET THEIR DICK WET IN YOUR PUSSY

You are a sad, lonely soul

>>2562065
For outlining part of a ridiculous exchange using phrases most likely familiar to my audience? Kay.

>>2562062

Still doesn't mean my response has to be related to sex

>>2562066

No, for thinking all guys are fat neckbeards with a one track mind

>>2562067
But as you didn't specifically state it wasn't, the overwhelming implications are that it is. l2communicate clearly.

>>2562069

Do people have to specifically state all the emotions and intent behind every bit of dialogue thrown at you? Christ you're thick.

>>2562068
You're saying the poster of the post I was summarizing:

>Males wont want to ever be your friend, unless there gay, or already have someone that fucks them.

ISN'T a fat neckbeard with a one track mind? Kay.

>>2562073

Sarcastically: Yes

>>2562074

No I'm calling YOU a fat, lonely, neckbeard with a one track mind for saying that

>>2562023
Cumdumpster fucking destroyed by >>2562047

>>2562073
Yes. When they refer to someone's post and then say something that apparently has no connection to it.

I guess I'll just assume you're a retard with mild Tourette's that can't control the urge to post unrelated tidbits about his sad little life.

>>2562079
>Can't think of an appropriate response to a counter argument
>Call the other a retard and run away

You're only proving my point and only showing how thick you are

Only faggots get friendzoned.
Don't think it's ever happend to me

>>2562075

I see what you did there

>>2562081
Since you're too dense to understand the basic principals of an exchange of concepts in conversation, I just assume you posting a random aside, which clearly had no bearing on the current topic (as you seem hellbent on convincing all of us).

Is that better? I guess posting unrelated information about yourself doesn't mean you're a retard, then. Just an attention whore.

>>2562091
look you fucktard, if it took that long for you to come out and say "BUT I AM NOT JUST TRYING TO BE YOUR FRIEND" and it only took that coming out for the other person to notice you, the fail's on your end not her.

>>2562091

Yes thats much better, but it still doesn't provide enough grounds to counter my argument. Better luck next time

>>2562104
Your argument is that your post was in no way referring to sex.

Because I believed no person could be that stupid or self-centered, I tried to convince you that it HAD to have been about sex for it to have been relevant to the conversation.

So yes. You did succeed. In convincing me that you posted what you did for no god damn reason.

>>2562100
I think you misquoted...that has nothing to do with anything I've said.

But I do agree with you, if that helps?

>>2562106
>tried to convince you that it HAD to have been about sex for it to have been relevant to the conversation.
>Trying to convince someone that their own words actually mean something else

Hold the presses here gentlemen we have have a genius

>>2562106
>So yes. You did succeed. In convincing me that you posted what you did for no god damn reason.

Like I already stated, I showed that there are multiple reasons for not wanting to be someone's friend. Not wanting be someone's friend doesn't automatically me they want to bone them.

>>2562112
Again, unrelated to the topic. Unless you were previously pretending to be friends with them.

That would, barely, be related to the topic of the thread.

Troll from /b/ has put this on every board.

>>2562112
But the topic of conversation wasn't friendship, it was sex. Please take a deep breath and read through the conversation, you'll understand why people thought you were saying that.
You don't need to post your emotions on every post, but it could help to be a little clearer when your contribution to the thread is tangental to the main conversation going on.

The thread basicaly went (paraphrased):
OP: Don't become just friends, make a stand or you won't get laid.
1: It annoys me when male friends break off what I hoped was a good friendship because they want in my pants.
2: Single straight guys never want to be just friends, they want sex.
You: I wouldn't want to be friends with the attractive girls I know.

Can you see how people could mistake this, given how the topic went?

>>2562120

Maybe it was? Ever think about that Mr. Thickston from thicktown thickania?

>>2562122
He'd have to be wrong to be a troll. Dude is a fucking saint spreading the good word to the basemest dwellers of 4chan.

>>2562131

Hi OP, what's it like having a vcard in your wallet?

HOW DO YOU GET AVATAR SKIN ON EVERY PICTURE??

Felt this was appropriate.

>>2562073
lmao

>>2562207
I must be a freak, I don't find either "type" appealing.

>>2562207
i skimmed, but it appears that there was no mention of money.

>>2562207
Interesting summary. I find it to be quite true and I like that the "real man" is pictured as not arrogant just for once.