>>
!!f6UHP2wLT8+ 02/02/10(Tue)16:58 No. 2547677 >>2547625 I
do believe (at least, it was posted on coscom as so) that they use a
grading scale to decide the winners & other awards (there is also
personal preference and discussion, but that's not really known by
anyone save for the judges). What I imagine happen is they took the
highest scorers from novice, journey, and master and those won their
divisions...then the next highest score from all around won the HM's
(as a novice did win one as well). In theory, the master entries should
have some of the highest all around scores being master class. ...of course, I could be wrong, but if the judging outline was as so stated, that would explain it.>>2547645 I
disagree with this...I think Ohayo is probably the hardest con to win
something at because of this, and it really fosters competition...there
are no BS of "good-enough" awards.>>2547013 >>2546996 I
also agree with these posts. The staff and judges did an excellent job
this year. A huge improvement over last year, and I think people will
be hard pressed to disagree with any of the decisions (craft at least,
I still don't know who won what in performance). The issue people are
having are against GSTQ herself, not the staff or judges.