>>2435297

Agreed. That's why they act like social retards here.

No shit.
What gave you the clue first, all the emoticons or images and links to Livejournal and Deviantart?

Other 20% is ronery fujoshi who sit at home coddling their dollfies in their Kuroshitsuji cosplay whilst reading slash fanfiction, or ronery men stalking female cosplayers.

The rest are just normal, I guess.

Try again.

>>2435322

> Implying only underage b& do emotes and post links.

>>2435331

Link to said map?

Also wow, being in the minority as a male on /cgl/ feels odd...

>>2435331
That was a year ago, it is probably vastly different now

>>2435342
The google maps one? No idea. There was an anon doing a lengthy survey a while back and once the thread was maxed added up all the results with this chart.

>>2435342
Why would that feel odd? I'm a dude and I visit here sometimes to check up on cons I plan to visit etc., but it's not surprising that a board dedicated to playing dressup has a mostly female userbase.

I don't know why I visited this board but it makes me feel icky and dirty. Back to /b/!

>>2435349
Also /cgl/ -Cosplay and EGL. The EGL part is women for the most part. So you got at least half the board being female for sure, then maybe half of the cosplay part female? So it's safe to assume us men will continue to be a minority.

>>2435364
Think back when you went to hover over "cgl" and what did you think? Lots of posts on yoko, Cosplay deviants bullshit and many things like that. I'm surprised to see it being a almost true blue board (ok not even close but whatever) Also it's the internet/4chan which seems to be riddled with tons of guys, also guys posing as girls.

>Implying any survey of 4chan can be done properly.

The userbase of 4chan is unlike any other forum. Millions upon millions of people lurk here without posting a single word.

Therefore any sort of "posting" sample survey will be inaccurate.

>>2435398implying about implying with an imply and a side of imply

>>2435342
Those gender ratios are probably overstated though. Seems to me a lot of guys are casual visitors coming for T&A threads only.

>>2435355
At least two threads surely?

>>2435398
No one said it was entirely accurate or that it had to be taken as law. Ease up buddy, it's an anonymous image board.

>>2435426
It seems you took my post too seriously, I only posted reasonable facts. Inaccurate statistics are pretty...useless.

>>2435355
Waaaaait a minute, seems there's a flaw in the survey. Claim you are under 18 and you get banned. 17 is the lowest anybody would go since they can always appeal the ban by claiming their birthday is coming up the next day.

>>2435453
>implying we have mods

>>2435467implying implying implying implying implying

such lu PEN it gutsa berp tinuk

>>2435349
Almost a year. We need another survey coming up on the 12th.

>>2435485
Why can't we do it now?

>>2435453
You don't get banned for claims, you get banned for actually breaking the rules.