>> |
10/15/09(Thu)03:46 No.2240888>>2240832 First
of all, I know many people, including myself, who go to school and work
jobs who do still take the time to make costumes. After all, people do
need to fund their hobbies somehow.
Secondly, consider a hypothetical judging situation: 2
people enter a contest, each costume cost $300 to produce. One is
bought from a commissioner, one is hand-made. They look identical. How
do you pick a winner? They both had to generate the income to support
their hobby, so they are equal and that is a moot point.
Lets
consider time spent. Commission person earns a measly 10/hr job, let's
say a fast-food job. Somehow, they saved up the money. Anyways, to
afford the costume, they had to work 30 hours at their job. This person
is paying for a commission price which is ideally a sum total of the
materials cost and the labor. The materials may have costed $150 and
the labor then would be $150 (theoretically).
Person 2 works
that same crappy $10/hr job that Person 1 has, so it still took 30
hours to make enough money. Person 2 would have spent all $300 on
materials (since labor by their own hands is free). Time making
costumes depends on the person, but it is usually many hours. Let's say
they spent 20 hours making it (which I believe is a gross
underestimate). The opportunity cost of spending 20 hours at the sewing
machine is earning 20 hours of wages ($200). Therefore, the true "cost"
of Person B's costume is more like "$500". |