[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
Board:  
Settings   Home
4chan
/a/ - Anime & Manga
Text Board: /anime/
Posting mode: Reply
[Return] [Bottom] [Refresh] [Update] []
Name
E-mail
Subject
Spoilers
[]
Comment
Verification
reCAPTCHA challenge image
 Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
[]
Password (Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Japanese このサイトについて - 翻訳
Toggle

I'll be doing the first "PMQ style" Q&A thread (details) on /q/ this Wednesday at 10:00PM ET. Look for a link in the global announcement area.

PS: You can hide these announcements with the [-] button to the left now. It'll automatically show new ones and keep old ones hidden.

Janitor applications are now closed. Thanks to everyone who applied! We received 7,500 in 24 hours.
→ TWO NEWS POSTS: "JOINING THE FUTURE, ONE COMMIT AT A TIME" & "BETTER MODERATION" ←

4chan now has a full-featured, inline extension. Read more about it on the news page. The extension is open source and on GitHub.
Some features are enabled by default—to disable, click [Settings] in the upper right-hand corner and select "Disable the extension".
In addition to the extension, 4chan now has a read-only JSON API. Crude documentation is available on GitHub.Our inline extension now supports image hover previews, and contains a few small tweaks.
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:23
No.71485092
File: 1347470600967.png-(264 KB, 500x700, 1347470558832.png)
264 KB
W Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:23 No.71485092
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:25
No.71485142
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:25 No.71485142
She caught that bug that's going around, huh?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:28
No.71485217
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:28 No.71485217
The stomach flu sucks I've had it for a week now.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:28
No.71485227
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:28 No.71485227
>>71485092 (OP)
Yes, Nanami-san, Hachi-chan is a catastrophe.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:29
No.71485246
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:29 No.71485246
Get some anti-virus, geez.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:29
No.71485251
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:29 No.71485251
>>71485234
I'll fuck you're pussy immune system
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:30
No.71485260
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:30 No.71485260
>She sees Windows 8
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:30
No.71485274
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:30 No.71485274
nanami-chan why did you let norton-sensei test you
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:30
No.71485283
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:30 No.71485283
>>71485142
I see what you did there...
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:32
No.71485347
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:32 No.71485347
File: 1347471174965.jpg-(60 KB, 790x662, SetWidth790-2012-01-10-E0(...).jpg)
60 KB
>>71485227
>>71485260
Look at these luddites, not embracing the future
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:34
No.71485397
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:34 No.71485397
>>71485379
This is my fetish
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:35
No.71485418
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:35 No.71485418
>Nanami has been forced to roleplay as a pirate
AVAST!!!!
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:35
No.71485424
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:35 No.71485424
File: 1347471349212.jpg-(85 KB, 640x500, 1344514761022.jpg)
85 KB
>>71485347
>2012
>Not understanding how the Windows release cycle works
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:37
No.71485458
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:37 No.71485458
>>71485424
Shut up, Windows 95 was awesome.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:37
No.71485465
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:37 No.71485465
>>71485424
What about Windows 2000?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:38
No.71485505
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:38 No.71485505
>>71485092 (OP)
Windows 8 tan WHERE.

I bet she's a whore, everyone touching her.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:38
No.71485507
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:38 No.71485507
>>71485458
Win95, AKA Win98 beta version.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:38
No.71485511
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:38 No.71485511
>>71485424
XP and Vista were both shit until SP2.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:39
No.71485523
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:39 No.71485523
>>71485507
98 was a beta for 98SE
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:39
No.71485536
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:39 No.71485536
>>71485511
>Implying Vista still wasn't shit after SP2
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:40
No.71485556
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:40 No.71485556
>>71485424
>implying 3.x was better than 95
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:40
No.71485564
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:40 No.71485564
>>71485465
Nobody liked her.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:41
No.71485579
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:41 No.71485579
>>71485507
>he never used 94 beta
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:41
No.71485589
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:41 No.71485589
>>71485556
It was in terms of reliability.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:41
No.71485590
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:41 No.71485590
>>71485536
Implying? No, I'm being quite explicit. All 7 did was add the superbar and some under the hood features, it's essentially the same thing as Vista.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:43
No.71485629
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:43 No.71485629
File: 1347471788898.jpg-(179 KB, 510x510, 1316840514765.jpg)
179 KB
>>71485590
>Defending Vista over Windows 7
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:43
No.71485636
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:43 No.71485636
>>71485590
I'd like to see you say that on /g/.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:43
No.71485641
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:43 No.71485641
>>71485590
They took out a few things I liked as well. Like the fucking picture viewer couldn't open .gifs anymore.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:43
No.71485656
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:43 No.71485656
>>71485629
Not him, but Vista is perfectly fine these days.
>>
 !Anoon./Lks
09/12/12(Wed)13:44
No.71485677
 !Anoon./Lks 09/12/12(Wed)13:44 No.71485677
File: 1347471893606.jpg-(69 KB, 720x580, [Mazui]_Ore_No_Imouto_-_0(...).jpg)
69 KB
>>71485564
>Windows 2k
>Not one of the best Windows releases
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:44
No.71485679
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:44 No.71485679
I never understood the hate for Vista

Maybe it's because I only ran it on a Q6600 with 8gb of RAM so I didn't have the issues of using it on a poverty PC.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:44
No.71485681
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:44 No.71485681
>>71485636
I did the other day and they all pretty much agreed.

7 is an improvement overall, of course, but only because it builds off of Vista. There wasn't a single damn thing in Vista they actually "rolled back" or "removed" for 7.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:45
No.71485711
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:45 No.71485711
>>71485589
Not on my old Packard Bell, it wasn't.

Not that it was rock solid, either, but I had way less problems with 95 than I did with 3.11.
>>
Doomzzg !pFLTp2Po.w
09/12/12(Wed)13:46
No.71485713
Doomzzg !pFLTp2Po.w 09/12/12(Wed)13:46 No.71485713
File: 1347471964045.jpg-(171 KB, 640x640, cf1526882b63a30324c8cfb16(...).jpg)
171 KB
3.1 is mai waifu
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:46
No.71485720
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:46 No.71485720
File: 1347471978541.jpg-(222 KB, 608x892, 1347465016406.jpg)
222 KB
>>71485589
>switch full screen DOS
>crash
>change audio settings
>crash
>change something
>crash
Just edit your .PIF file, they said.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:46
No.71485728
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:46 No.71485728
File: 1347471990499.jpg-(25 KB, 399x395, 1339619530781.jpg)
25 KB
>>71485656
>>71485679

>This is what retards actually believe.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:47
No.71485753
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:47 No.71485753
>>71485728
Tell me why Vista is bad.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:48
No.71485778
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:48 No.71485778
>>71485753
Would you prefer paragraph or greentext format?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:48
No.71485785
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:48 No.71485785
>>71485753
Hardware incompatibilities
Obscene memory usage
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:48
No.71485788
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:48 No.71485788
>>71485753
Because the young guy in the Apple commercial said it was
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:49
No.71485805
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:49 No.71485805
>>71485785
He said Vista, not XP
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:49
No.71485824
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:49 No.71485824
>>71485753
Use any other version of windows and find out for yourself.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:50
No.71485842
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:50 No.71485842
>>71485785
>Hardware incompatibilities
XP
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:50
No.71485852
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:50 No.71485852
>>71485824
I have used most versions of Windows, including 7. I just don't see the issue with using Vista. It's certainly an improvement on XP.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:50
No.71485857
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:50 No.71485857
File: 1347472257818.jpg-(41 KB, 673x474, 1342086135022.jpg)
41 KB
>>71485805
1/10 you made me reply.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:51
No.71485860
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:51 No.71485860
>>71485785
Who cares about memory usage?

Just buy more. W7 uses quite a bit but I've got 16gb so I'm set.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:51
No.71485874
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:51 No.71485874
>>71485852
And 7 is an improvement to Vista.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:51
No.71485875
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:51 No.71485875
>>71485852
The thing about Vista is that it had all the same problems as XP did when it came out

Except now everyone could much more easily bitch about it on the Internet.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:52
No.71485916
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:52 No.71485916
>>71485842
>>71485805
I'm still using XP and never had hardware compatibility problems. I heard Vista had a lot of driver incompatibilites tho, and 7 inherited some of those.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:52
No.71485921
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:52 No.71485921
>>71485860
That's a terrible argument, anon.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:53
No.71485941
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:53 No.71485941
>>71485874
And how does that make XP superior to Vista?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:53
No.71485950
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:53 No.71485950
>not using a mac
lol fuckin poorfags
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:54
No.71485988
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:54 No.71485988
>>71485916
Did you use it in 2001?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:56
No.71486029
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:56 No.71486029
>>71485988
I did, it sucked.

It got better as it went along though.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:56
No.71486030
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:56 No.71486030
>>71485950
This is bait.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:56
No.71486038
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:56 No.71486038
File: 1347472580012.jpg-(18 KB, 140x239, 1341516370307.jpg)
18 KB
ITT:

>Deluded poorfags defend Vista because they are too poor/stupid to upgrade to anything else.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:56
No.71486058
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:56 No.71486058
>>71485988
Not him but I was using Windows 98se back those years.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:57
No.71486069
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:57 No.71486069
>>71485988
Probably a little later, and I know it was terrible until late SP2. But currently it's pretty reliable. Just clean reinstall every year or else....
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:57
No.71486070
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:57 No.71486070
>>71486038
>implying I didn't upgrade to 7 on day one
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:58
No.71486111
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:58 No.71486111
On a different note, has anyone tried Win8?

How is it? Is it even worth upgrading from what people have seen so far? I heard you can use certain programs to bypass the whole Metro shit.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:58
No.71486127
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:58 No.71486127
>>71485988
Not him, I just kept using 2000.
It suck that much until SP1.
>>
Statboy !ERRoRSrqM.
09/12/12(Wed)13:59
No.71486153
Statboy !ERRoRSrqM. 09/12/12(Wed)13:59 No.71486153
File: 1347472757393.jpg-(94 KB, 303x419, disappointed.jpg)
94 KB
>tfw you think you've accidentally clicked on /g/
>tfw it's just /a/ shitposting
>tfw can no longer troll with shitty desktop pictures and Mac worship threads
>tfw you have already reported this post, or someone with your IP has already reported it
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:59
No.71486160
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:59 No.71486160
File: 1347472769893.jpg-(196 KB, 486x539, ae1cf15e50c9cb66d876887f6(...).jpg)
196 KB
Windows a shit.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)13:59
No.71486164
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)13:59 No.71486164
>>71486111
Honestly I'd question upgrading anything you have right now.

I find it highly appealing for the new hardware that actually accommodates it, though.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:00
No.71486182
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:00 No.71486182
>>71486111

See:
>>71485424
If you want your desktop/laptop to have a shitty tablet interface go for it.
>>
 !Anoon./Lks
09/12/12(Wed)14:01
No.71486206
 !Anoon./Lks 09/12/12(Wed)14:01 No.71486206
>>71486111
Used it on my laptop a while ago in the Dev Preview.

Ended up just making it work like 7. The whole Metro app thing doesn't do it for me.

Worked pretty nice on a tablet I tested it on at a tech show, but on a PC, it's not worth it.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:01
No.71486211
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:01 No.71486211
>>71486111
Yes, I wouldn't use it for a desktop.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:01
No.71486229
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:01 No.71486229
>>71486038
>"Stupid poorfags, why are you still running Vista and not 7??
>?Why should we? What does 7 do so much better than Vista?"
>"7 is better just because, you poorfag/idiot/faggot/plebeian/lookatmeusingbigboyinsults
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:01
No.71486230
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:01 No.71486230
>>71486153
>not knowing that /a/ and /g/ are one and the same
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:02
No.71486257
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:02 No.71486257
>>71486164
I seriously think they're going to completely annihilate the 10" tablet category with it.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:03
No.71486277
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:03 No.71486277
File: 1347472995839.png-(304 KB, 492x492, 1345511168860.png)
304 KB
>>71486229

Stay mad, vistafag.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:03
No.71486286
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:03 No.71486286
It saddens me that there are so little fanart of Nanami-chan.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:03
No.71486296
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:03 No.71486296
>>71486160
Agree, running Ubuntu 12.04 with mate right now
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:04
No.71486306
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:04 No.71486306
So how much would a tablet with Metro cost? I presume it has more functions than an Android tablet and cost less than an iPad?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:04
No.71486323
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:04 No.71486323
File: 1347473081266.png-(37 KB, 250x250, 1336081314623.png)
37 KB
>>71486296
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:05
No.71486338
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:05 No.71486338
>>71486286
That window sitter with the huge bouncing boobs was good.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:05
No.71486341
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:05 No.71486341
>>71486306
More functions? No, it will be locked down like an ipad, unless it's a surface pro
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:05
No.71486358
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:05 No.71486358
>>71486306
The ARM ones should be around the same price ($250-$600)
The x86 ones should be around Ultrabook prices ($800-$1200)
>>
 !Anoon./Lks
09/12/12(Wed)14:05
No.71486360
 !Anoon./Lks 09/12/12(Wed)14:05 No.71486360
>>71486257
I for one are rather interested to see how the "Pro" Surface tablet pans out. Pretty much exactly what I want from a tablet if it lives up to expectations.

>>71486306
If it's using a regular architecture instead of ARM, it runs fully-fledged Windows, not the RT mobile equivalent. Ergo, it does what your desktop does.
We don't know pricing for the regular ones yet, though.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:06
No.71486390
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:06 No.71486390
>>71486323
What's wrong with Ubuntu anon-kun?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:07
No.71486448
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:07 No.71486448
>>71486390
Don't worry, he's a lost lamb.
Forgetting that Ubuntu is /a/-related, that silly sir,
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:08
No.71486454
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:08 No.71486454
>>71486296
>Ubuntu 12.04
You make Stallman cry, switch to gNewSense and you shall be forgiven.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:08
No.71486475
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:08 No.71486475
>>71486390
Wait, you're actually being serious?

Nothing's majorly wrong with Ubuntu. It's just that 12.04 is terrible compared to 10.4 or 11.4.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:10
No.71486513
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:10 No.71486513
>This thread
less arguing, more OS-tans

Here, have a package of them:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/67147339/os-tan.7z
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:10
No.71486537
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:10 No.71486537
>>71486513
>dropbox
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:11
No.71486566
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:11 No.71486566
What distro do you think that I should install on my notebook?
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:11
No.71486568
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:11 No.71486568
>>71486537
Oh what now
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:11
No.71486574
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:11 No.71486574
>>71486277
If you could just try to formulate a solid argument as to why 7 is worth buying, rather than making a fool of yourself and assuming that "me calling you out on something = I mad", you'd be a lot more credible than you are now.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:11
No.71486575
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:11 No.71486575
>>71486537
too lazy to mediafire it.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:11
No.71486579
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:11 No.71486579
Fun fact: I use OS X and playing with VM, like Win95 and 3.11. Fuck yeah SVGA.EXE
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:12
No.71486606
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:12 No.71486606
>>71486475
It just has newer versions of the software on the repos, I don't even use Unity. Anyways my favourite version of Ubuntu was 10.04
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:13
No.71486619
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:13 No.71486619
>>71486566
Linux for Niggers
>>
Weabro !!H5+hjQdDZNP
09/12/12(Wed)14:13
No.71486637
Weabro !!H5+hjQdDZNP 09/12/12(Wed)14:13 No.71486637
>>71486390
I stopped using it with the whole Unity/Gnome 3 change. There should be a stable gnome 2.x fork by now.
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:15
No.71486678
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:15 No.71486678
>>71486637
Debian is switching to xcfe
>>
Anonymous
09/12/12(Wed)14:15
No.71486686
Anonymous 09/12/12(Wed)14:15 No.71486686
I'm shit with Ubuntu. I can't get my wireless usb to work on it. It finds the connections fine, but I have to manually input the IPv4 settings and even then I can't connect to the internet.
Reply to Thread
[Return] [Top] [Refresh] [Update] []
Delete Post [File Only] Password
Style
[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

- futaba + yotsuba -
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
Thread WatcherR