>>
10/01/11(Sat)13:07 No. 55343353 >>55342880 OK, let's quote your post down, then.>The
entirety of Madoka is one big otaku panderfest. Cute girls in frilly
costumes? Yep, the target audience should be abundantly clear. I'm not
saying it's as bad as the run-of the mill otaku pandering show, but it's
definitely within the boundaries. Cardcaptor Sakura also has cute girls in frilly costumes. So does Sailor Moon. Both are obviously panderfests. Not
saying that Madoka isn't pandering to males in that regard, but I am
saying that your reasons for why are pretty skewed and biased, and do
not apply to the entire watching audience. If they did, Nanoha would
have been much more popular from the start. Madoka was popular partially
because magical girls are popular, yeah. But Eva was popular partially
because mecha was popular, too. You could make exactly the same argument
for both. The main reason for the popularity of both is that
they took a genre that most people watched heavily as kids and
introduced something much more plot-heavy and with a darker tone. As a
magical girl fan, I feel pretty much the same way about Madoka that you
feel about Eva.And
no, say what you will about Sailor Moon, etc having darker
finales...most magical girl shows don't have a tone as dark as Madoka
did through 75% of the show, nor were 90% of mascot animals morally
ambiguous and working against their magical girls, nor are 90% of
magical girl shows plot-heavy. Madoka did do something different within
its genre.