it's full of yo mama

Sugar, Spice and Flour, Eggs..

chemical X

It's made of cake, you retard.

Whole lotta love.

>>52340582
you know, i think there's something anatomically wrong with that picture...
the pantyshot is too high

>>52340654
>implying anyone on /ɐ/ knows where the vagina bone is

>>52340550
I'd love to eat that cake. But I'd rather eat one of my loved one instead.

>>52340662
Oh not you don't. reported.

>>52340663
>implying anyone knows better than us

>>52340619
Why the fuck did I expect semen even before reading the recipe?

>>52340619
WAAAAAAAAAIIIIT

>>52340654
I hate those pics where you can see the buttcheeks from the front. That just doesn't happen unless you have a low-angle shot which isn't the case in that picture.

you will never have someone make a cake of your waifu for you

>>52340671
Reported for what? I posted a completely worksafe picture.

>>52340713
He's reporting it in place of his buttbuddy.

>>52340743
Nah, don't worry, I've already done so.

>>52340713
You know perfectly well why that picture was posted in the first place.

You aren't fooling "anyone" with your trolling attempts. And I'm also reporting it because I don't like to see that content of one of my favourite character's on a board that belongs elsewhere.

>>52340713
He's helping his tomodachi.

>>52340671

Just stop posting, everyone knows what you're going to say anyways.

I LOEV UI (my third waifu which i'll probably leave for the next one soon)
REPORTED!

It's pathetic.

>Komeiji !!x3STzMfD3PQ
>Uidrew !!m4tW5PKB2UV

I can see you two sitting together all day jerking each other off whilst shitposting on /a/.

>>52340754
>I'm also reporting it because I don't like to see that content of one of my favourite character's on a board that belongs elsewhere.

I posted a worksafe /a/-related image on /a/. "BAWWW I don't like this!" is not a valid reason for reporting something.

>>52340841
>I posted a worksafe /a/-related image on /a/.
Yes, and it's a spam/troll image.

>>52340841
The bottom picture isn't SFW idiot. It's NSFW.

Don't believe me? I could save the picture right now, make a thread of it with that omage uploaded, and get banned for "NSFW" meterial.

Fact it - stop posting it.

1 part Cake
1 part Kawaii
2 parts Uguu

Delicious cake, you must eat it.

>>52340877
It's worksafe you moron.

>>52340754
>>52340869
>>52340877
>>52340753
>>52340671

hey
hey guys
guys
pic related

I think I ate too much guys.

>>52340877
I don't see any nudes though. What you are saying is that ecchi pictures are NSFW, which is +18.
And if that is so, then why do console games contain such material? The same goes for 12+/16+ anime of course.

>>52340869
>spam

Huh? I've posted it like once in the past, and that was ages ago.

>troll

More like a joke. Can't you seriously stand some humor just because it involves a character you like? Talk about getting easily offended.

>>52340908
So? I could make a thread with a SFW troll image and it would still be against the rules.

>>52340877
That picture is worksafe, though. On 4chan, images considered to be worksafe are images that don't explicitly contain any genitalia, sexual content, or gore. Because the image he posted contains none of those, it's safe for work.

You guys remember when stuff didn't get deleted frequently and /a/ not run by nazi's? I sure don't.

In fact, I guess I could proceed with posting amusing K-ON images, since people in this thread certainly seem like they need to take it easy.

>Komeiji and Uidrew thread
It's okay, people! Just keep calm and evatuate the thread slowly!

>>52340950
>Huh? I've posted it like once in the past, and that was ages ago.
Obviously I'm not talking about you in particular. The image itself has been reposted a thousand fucking times each day for no reason other than to spam or start a shitstorm.

>More like a joke.
Seeing a pure character being treated like a slut is bullshit when the context of the scene is completely normal. Yui (or Ritsu, I forget) shows Azusa the club money they got recently. They then spend it on musical gear and instruments.

If you're going to make a joke, at least have it make a modicum of sense.

did somebody say troll?

also, how hard working r the janitors today..

>>52340978
Why, they ruin every thread.

>>52340955
If I posted that, I would have gotten banned really fast (it would come under NSFW).

Now seriously, Shut the hell up, and 0/10 for failed attempt of trolling.

Hope you enjoy the thread and derailing it with that crap.

>>52340997
>Seeing a pure character being treated like

Dude, slow down. This is fucking anime. You're taking it way too seriously.

>>52340997
But she is a slut

Now we're thinking with portals!

>>52340997
>Seeing a pure character being treated like a slut is bullshit

>>52341020
That's because everyone hates you and they're just looking for an excuse to ban you.

Man, this image never fails to make me laugh.

>>52341068
No I only got banned because I posted something that didn't belong on /a/ (ie: that one Ui picture where she's nude and it being nsfw).

>>52340997
>>52341020
the butthurt is overwhelming.

Man, I had way less K-ON images than I thought. Oh well.

>>52340955
Regardless, it's still not "worksafe" in its strictest meaning. Then again, anybody who browses /a/ at work is a fucking retard.

>>52341034
Of course it's just anime, but pulling this with Azusa is taking it a bit too far for comfort.

>>52341044
No she isn't.

>>52341085
So why would you get banned for posting a SFW picture?

Gimme the chocolate?

>>52341095
Someone is jealous they can't browse /a/ at work, if they even have a job in the first place.

>>52341020
>If I posted that, I would have gotten banned really fast (it would come under NSFW).
I think thats just an excuse for banning you. After all there is no rule banning for retards from /a/.

>>52341020
Protip: You're banned for being fucking retarded.

>>52341106
sadly

>>52341096
It's not "SFW" though. Despite it not showing it in full, it still shows nudity and I think the fact that "sexually suggestive" is tagged on that picture on one of the booru's, well I don't think you need to work it out do you?

>>52341106
There's a rule on not banning idiots who post porn though when it doesn't belong here.

>>52341103
thank you for saying, exactly what i was thinking.

>>52341020
You're not thinking clearly.
See >>52340916

That image is the same as the K-ON image you're referring to. In addition, the thread is particularly "NSFW", under your definition, as the OP text supplements the suggestively lewd nature of the photo. However, the thread hasn't been deleted and the OP hasn't been banned.

As it stands, that sort of image isn't NSFW, neither are reaction images from doujins, hentai, etc. You're letting your personal dislike of any perceived slight against K-ON influence what you determine to be rule-breaking or not.

Is this reaction image NSFW?

>>52341096
Because it's a shitty image that is only used to spam or troll the board. This thread is an example of that.

>>52341153
There's a difference though. Uiharu isn't naked unlike Azusa is. And the other difference is that with the way it shows Azusa, she's getting laid by a guy (whereas the picture you provided, Uiharu isn't).

The only thing I'm wondering is why NFSW isn't allowed on a 18+ site.

>>52341157
And you guys shitty tripfags who's only goal in life is to spam or troll the board. Cry more.

this thread is turning into a janitor-fest!
stop deleting posts, it's too hard to follow the butthurt!

Am I cute uguu~?

>>52341153
Drilly-tan, there is a difference between reaction images and a character shown to be having sex. Genitalia might not be explicitly shown, but it's as close as you can get to NSFW.

>>52341180
That's May from Pokémon. Can you even read?

Hey janitors, do you know how much easier you job would be if these two tripfags were banned?

It would more than likely end over half the trolling and shitposting. Not to mention the "NSFW" images.

>>52341209
TL note: Cute means Kawaii
>>52341217
Could you just learn to not give a shit dude, there are a lot of images making fun of Yui but I don;t rage every time I see them.

>>52341230
Are you retarded or something? I was explaining to >>52341153 <--- about the link in >>52340916 <---

Seriously.

>>52341204
Don't worry, just go onto easymodo. None of the posts are deleted there.

>>52341193
So the board doesn't turn into a porn dump, I guess.

>>52341200
Neither of us are spamming or trolling the board you fucking retard.

>>52341209


MOTHER OF GOD THATS

KAWAII~

>>52341095
The meanings of terms change overtime and differ from site to site. An example of an image that isn't worksafe on the most mainstream of casual sites, such as an online blog, would be someone in undergarments. Characters in various states of undress are posted here simply as reaction images in a discussion. Said posters are not banned, because the "strictest" definition of worksafe isn't the definition 4chan uses. Get over the image attacking your "waifu" and ignore it. You're instigating these threads with your remarks to the provocation, and you yourself are responsible for the reputation and usage that image has now.

>>52341217
Yeah, handholding is almost sex too, no more pictures of that. so ronery

>>52341241
I'm here forever son. And you'd only ban a person if they were breaking rules.

This is just a "BAWWW BAN SOMEONE THAT I DON'T LIKE".

>>52341246
>Is this reaction image NSFW?
No, you're retarded.

>>52341180
>And the other difference is that with the way it shows Azusa, she's getting laid by a guy
Really? I never saw the full picture.

I just assumed that she was wearing a no-strap bikini, almost drowned in a pool at night time, then given mouth to mouth resuscitation by the pool's lifeguard in her hotel room which was nearby. The picture shows the lifeguard's point of view after he saved her life. I never imagined that she was having sex in the pic...

>>52341285
>This is just a "BAWWW BAN SOMEONE THAT I DON'T LIKE".

The irony in this is off the charts.

>>52341294
Let me explain it clearer for you.

>Uiharu image in what >>52341153 <--- provided = SFW.

>That azusa image that guy posted = NSFW.

Understand now?

>>52341217
>as close as you can get

that's the point.

the image is not NSFW, your imagination is making it so. it can be the usual fall-on-top-of-girl-by-accident gag, or can be NSFW. you have no clue, from the image by itself, on what's the situation. and you cannot know. because it's not real.

>>52341285
You do realize that literally nobody here likes you or Komeiji, right?

>>52341262
I know that the image is not NSFW. That's not why I'm complaining or reporting it. Like I said, it's just spam/troll fodder. It's the same as any other forced meme or daily thread. Posting that shit is against the rules, whether or not you like it.

And no, I'm not responsible for this shit. The image was posted plenty before I got involved with it.

>>52341271
There's more to that image than just hand-holding, dipshit.

>>52341326

I feel kinda sorry for them.

>>52341285
No, it's more like BAWW ban someone no one except his retarded friend likes.

No one likes you, no one. It would make /a/ better undoubtedly.

inb4 you take your trip off and try and say otherwise.

>>52341323
He asks you a question, and you respond with something completely different.

>>52341340
I sure as hell don't. I don't like threads getting deleted just because they feel like it.

Christ, how shitty of a person do you have to be to be exiled by a bunch of anime watching neckbeards. That's pretty bad.

>>52341324
>your imagination is making it so
Oh come on.

The above image obviously implies that Azusa is whoring herself for money. There is no other possible context for it when it's posted with both parts.

>>52341340
The sad part is that they don't even realize it.

>>52341321
Your trolling, right? Please say that you are or I'll need to call you plain stupid here.

>>52341322
Hardly irony since it's >>52341241 <--- is the only one that's mad here.

>>52341326
>he thinks I care.

>>52341344
I merely reported it because I don't like seeing one of my favourite characters being treated liek that. And like I said, does it look like I care if people like me or not?

I'm still going to be here reporting stuff that aren't /a/ related.

>>52341359
I don't think so. Here, let me show you something so you understand it better.

>>52341230
This is may.

>>52341180
^This was posted to show the difference of Azusa being NSFW and Uiharu in >>52340916

>>52341376
Go die in a fire, and take Azusa with you.

>>52341340
Well, he kinda asks for this hate.

>>52341326

I like Komeiji, Uidrew can die in a fire though.

>>52341416

Its just painful to read.

fuck 4chan x

>>52341394
Wrong >>52341241 is trying to make /a/ a better place.

Also, you admit that no one here likes you by saying "he thinks I care" so why do you stay? Simple, just to troll.

>>52341386
Do you actually think people adopt a tripcode to garner respect? Nobody should give a fuck whether or not people respect them.

>>52341407
You first.

>>52341376
there actually is if you fucking thought about it for a bit.
christ you're stupid

>>52341430
You left your sage on Komeiji

>>52341394
>Your trolling
Really? His trolling? How can you not know the difference between your and you're when you can only speak one fucking language?

>>52341470
If the image is completely normal and has no impure undertones, then why are the threads always started with "What a slut" and similar phrases?

>>52341376
>implies

you see the irony, right?
i can take two photos and post them, thus creating an suggestion(ie, your mom and a coffin = she died). but you know, a suggestion is not real. you mom is not dead(i think). that image is not NSFW, the suggestion(which is up to the user) may be. you have a dirty mind and you like to imagine your waifu as a slut. face it.

>>52341453
merely by saying you want NSFW images to stay on here doesn't make this place any better. And I stay here because I enjoy 4chan.

>>52341477
So what if I made an idiotic typo? I'm asking if you are trolling or not and if you seriously aren't, then you need to go look at that picture in clearer depth.

Enjoy your thread. I'll just watch it now since I've lost interest now.

>>52341475

nope

>>52341505
>>52341505
because baka ecchis perceive the image as her being a slut and whoring herself out. and you decide to follow the people who think that about your waifu.

>>52341510
No, because I don't view Azusa like that whatsoever. It's the fact that you guys are reposting it constantly and calling her a slut or a whore that irks me. It's not funny. It's not amusing. It's just retarded and makes no sense at all given her character. You're on the same level as the Satan spammers.

Poof! And just like that, /a/ was magical again.

Now if only the rest of /a/ could do this.

inb4 these autist fucks reply to me

>>52341539
How disloyal to his waifu, I bet Azusa would be ashamed if she saw him took their sides.

>>52341561
what program is dat?

>>52341539
Nope. I'm attacking them for percieving it that way. I already said that I would never view Azusa that way.

>>52341603
addon or extension for browsers.

>>52341512
I'm not that guy you gigantic fucktard. I'm only here to throw shit at you.

>>52341561
you do know I can just bypass your stupid filter by taking my trip off right?

Just thought I'd let you know that before I decided to leave this thread.

Oh look it's Komeji and Uidrew acting like waifu agony aunts.

Stop this shit already we don't fucking care if you think Azusa or whoever is a slut she is pure she does fucking porn.

>>52341651
which tripfag are you?

>>52341603
4chan spam blocker for google chrome.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/jllcmojpghjdaafeopffidhhmjojhkec

I'm sure there's something for the others with a little bit of googling.

>>52341621
you know that the way you see the image depends only on you, right? a child will simply see a sweaty oneechan, but you see a slut. you have, not even so unconsciously, accepted the idea of her being a slut, thus you can see that context.
if you were truly pure those images would not affect you.

somebody please post an NTR doujin now

>>52341717
Not that guy, but thanks, I'll be using this.

>>52341651
Oh yeah? Prove it. You can't? Too bad.

>>52341561
Here's a great trip: hide these threads when something starts. These are the only threads where I shitpost in. Blocking tripcodes altogether just makes it a pain to follow conversations in other threads because you can't see who a person is replying to.

If you hate me that much, then oh well. Tough shit.

>>52341720
Well said, man.
Komeji, you piece of shit. Get out of here already.
You too Uidrew.

>>52341747
wrong, all of your posts are shitposts, stupid.

>>52341745
I just did by taking off my trip.

>>52341757
But the thing is my friend, Azusa isn't a slut in canon. She would only be one in a person's mind and only theirs. To other people, she can be pure.

>>52341693
It was probably Komeiji, because he forgot to take his sage off again and Uidrew has admitted he's too retarded to sage.

>>52341747
Every thread you post is in shit though.

>>52341786
If that was the case we wouldnt have you guys reporting this. Unless you see her as a slut.

>>52341792
No, it was me since I merely took it off once to prove to said person that his filter can't do jack shit.

>>52341806
It;'s against the rules though. I don't care what your views on Azusa is... but I'd rather not see it being posted on here since it's against the rules.

Don't want to see me saying "reported?", stop posting it.

>>52341786
perfectly true. but to find offensive an image as the one posted you need to have a dirty mind, and accept the thought of her as a slut, otherwise it will not affect you. see>>52341720 or>>52341510 for details

>>52341720
It doesn't matter what I see from the images. I'm attacking you guys for calling her a slut and whore.

>>52341778
Nope. It just seems that way to you because you have a negative perception of me. I make plenty of normal posts.

>>52341747
>admits to being a shitposter

Oh my. Guess I'll have to report this.

Why do you guys keep responding to deleted posts?

get your tripfag blocker today!

>>52341811
Congratulations, you're retarded.

>>52341840
I admit I have a dirty mind, and I will admit altogether, that picture doesn't offend me. But like I've said earlier, it's not suppose to be posted on here so of course I'm going to report it.

If it was posted on the correct board, I wouldn't give a fuck.

>>52341863
Congrats I can just bypass your filter when I have the motivation to do so.

>Start a troll thread to lure tripfaggots in
>After 100 or so posts complain about the said tripfaggots you goaded into coming into the thread
Gee wiz, it's like I'm really surrounded by retards

>>52341850
What else would they be? I'm not stupid enough to think I'm contributing in any way when I argue about this shit. Everybody in this thread is shitposting, me included.

>>52341833
It isnt against the rules. You're just overcomplicating things. It breaks NO rules, it IS /a/ related. Stop bringing your perverted mind into this matter and bring up the facts. Looking at this image, there is no nudity, no gore, nothing out of the ordinary. Of course, this may be different for you because you see things as pure as Azusa as a slut, which is just outright awful.

>>52341882
I can still hide your posts instantly because it's painfully obvious that it's you who posts retarded shit. But I don't, because this is more fun.

>>52341895
You need to take a look at the bottom picture again. She's on a bed, she's naked, she's got tears in her eyes, that can easily show that she's having sex with someone. And guess what? It's NOT /a/ related.

>>52341895
>It isnt against the rules.
Spam and trolling is, retard. Do you think that image is posted for any other reason now besides stirring shit up?

It's not NSFW, but it's still against the rules.

>>52341921

Can't you just leave the interpretation of that to the janitors and mods whose, you know, job it is to decide that?

>>52341921
No, it's not clear that she's having sex, why can't you get that through your thick skull? Nowhere in these two images does it imply anything sexual, fuck. Kid, right now, I'm pretty much naked on my bed, wearing only boxers, and I'm typing this laughing so hard that I'm tearing up.

>>52341940
wait, what the fuck are you here for? you start by arguing that it isnt NSFW, now you're agreeing that it is?

>>52341833
i doubt that image is against the rules since it's not NSFW. it can be a troll bait, but also an opinion. i, for instance think that she could, and would, sell her body for money. and i'm serious, not trolling. it's my idea of the character. i don't think that having an idea is against the rules, as it's not expressing it(given that i keep it SFW). if that is not the case well, fuck the eagles and fuck freedom of speech.

>>52341940
But you and Uidrew basically spam "reported" all the time. You could report without commenting and leave it be but you have to attentionwhore "OKAY GAIZ KON DEFENCE FORCE IS HERE MOVE ALONG PEOPLE OH YEAH I REPORTED JUST SO YOU KNOW AND IM SAYING THAT I REPORTED SO YOU KNOW THAT I WAS HERE".

High school dropouts these days...

>>52341972
>2011
>American Imageboard
>Freedom of speech
haha oh wow

>>52341971
Learn how to read.

I never said that it's NSFW. Uidrew did, not me. I'm saying that it's a spam/troll image and is against the rules for that reason.

>>52341944
Why should I?

>>52341953
You need to take another look at that picture then. What else would she be doing on a bed with tears in her eyes hmm? Why not look at the Mugi / Ritsu ones? same artist = same suggestion in what's gonig to happen in the pictures.

>>52341972
She's not selling her body for money though.

>>52341921
>You need to take a look at the bottom picture again. She's on a bed, she's naked, she's got tears in her eyes, that can easily show that she's having sex with someone.

Because a girl can't cry naked on her bed without having sex.

Also;
>Uidrew
>thinks tears is a flag for having sex

Confirmed for demented rapist pedophile.

>>52341996
maybe its real fucking hot there so shes not wearing clothes. Keep in mind only her top body is showing, she could be wearing underwear. she's on 4chan as a common hobby and to practice her english when she comes across this shitty thread and sees two tripfags jerking each other off and cant help but think about that. she starts tearing up because its so outright disgusting.

>>52341996

>Why should I?

Its their job! If you do report there is no need to let everyone know!

>>52341987
>But you and Uidrew basically spam "reported" all the time.
I used to. I ignored the image posted until somebody made a post provoking me (>>52340743). If nobody said anything about me or Uidrew and let this thread die, I wouldn't have done anything.

And anyways, doing nothing about a rule-breaking image is worse than saying "reported". Like I've said many times, how will they learn if nobody tells them that what they're doing is wrong?

>>52342020
With the doujin's I've mostly read, they are usually crying when they are in pleasure from having sex.

>>52342037
Don't make me laugh.

>>52342038
A job that they'd hardly be doing unless someone was reporting it.

>>52342055
ITS HIS FAULT
HE MADE FUN OF ME OVER THE INTERNET

>>52342068
>A job that they'd hardly be doing unless someone was reporting it.

Yes but there is still no need to let everyone know it was you who reported it and that it offended you.

>>52342068
(2nd person you replied to)
Look, what I'm trying to get across is, I don't fucking know what she's doing on the bed naked(for her top half anyway) while crying. It doesn't have to be sex, but you would probably think of it that way(as well as many others) because of reading your rape doujins. I really don't know what else to say. Nowhere is it implied she's having sex, why is it so hard to understand that?

i love this thread so much

>>52342098
It's not my fault kick up a shitstorm just because I'm doing the right thing. Would you rather I say some "other" retarded line when I'm reporting something?

>>52342107
Because you've clearly not seen the picture deep enough and understand that it IS what it's implying. Sure it might say "sexually suggestive" on the booru's, but if you've seen the person's "other" version's of Mugi and ritsu, then it's obvious that Azusa is having sex here and it's tears of ectasy.

Seriously. You aren't doing vert hard here.

>>52342020
There's more to it than that. There are arms in the corner of the image and she's naked with the image above her (PoV).

>thinks tears is a flag for having sex
They are. Maybe you'd know that if you actually looked at fanart/doujins.

if you guys are going to persist on arguing about pointless nonsense could you at least use sage please

>>52342136
>It's not my fault kick up a shitstorm just because I'm doing the right thing. Would you rather I say some "other" retarded line when I'm reporting something?

I'd just rather you, and others, said nothing at all after and moved on to another thread. Its not hard.

>>52342136
YOU AREN'T SUPPOSED TO SAY ANYTHING WHEN YOU REPORT SOMETHING. WHY DO YOU FEEL THE NEED TO TAKE CREDIT IN REPORTING A BAD IMAGE? DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE TO FUCKING PRAISE YOU? "ATTA'BOY UIDREW! YOU GOT THEM AZUSA HATERS GOOD!"? FUCK.

>>52342068
>>52342142
>they read sexual doujins about their waifus
I don't think you have any right to lecture anybody from this point onwards.

>>52342150
Your opinion is invalid since we are clearly not talking about that. I'm certain the artist who did that picture of Azusa knows how the "female" body works.

>>52342178
I've only read two. I don't read them anymore so I think you can fuck off and go back to your "things_like_that_make_me_sick".

>>52342171
I don't expect that. I just do what I wish. Not my fault you get angry over one simple word.

>>52342142
>They are. Maybe you'd know that if you actually looked at fanart/doujins.

Oh god, my sides.

>>52342136
Well, sorry for not going on booru and sorry for not listening to others on /a/? Why would I listen to this bunch? They're fucking stupid.

What I'm asking you to do is look at this image, and nothing else. Based on this image alone, it's perfectly /a/ related due to being from an anime, and it's SFW considering nothing is shown. That's all there is to it. Don't bring in opinions from /a/ into this, and don't bring sexual images from booru into this.

>>52342171
Stop yelling, man.

And saying "reported" does do something. It tells them that they did something wrong and broke the rules. If you made a thread and had people reporting you, would you just think that everything is okay?

>>52342178
Neither of us said anything about our waifus. I'm talking about doujins and fanart in general. Tears during sex is a common trait.

>>52342211

What is it about that magnificent Iranian bastard that always makes me want to laugh?

>>52342158
>>52342158
>>52342158
>>52342158
>>52342158
>>52342158
This. Don't bump this garbage to the front page. You wanna fight? At least have the courtesy to keep it to yourselves!

>>52342231
>If you made a thread and had people reporting you, would you just think that everything is okay?

I would ignore them as whiney crybabies. Only getting bothered if a mod deleted/banned me for it.

>>52342231
when the persons thread is deleted, he'll understand that it isn't right to post that. that's all there is to it.

>>52342169
Well that's frankly impossible you know. If it offends people, that's not my fault. They shouldn't be on the internet if their "feelings" get hurt easily.

>>52342219
you still don't understand do you? That bottom picture isn't SFW as it implies she's having sex. Why can't you read?

Man, what a shitstorm a single image can cause just because someone can't handle a joke.

How sad times we live in.

>>52342178
>they read sexual doujins about their waifus
More like "they admit reading sexual doujins about their waifus" which is even worse.

>>52342231
Maybe if this were some kiddy nurutu forum. Here, it just tells people that they've got the attention of two notoriously moronic tripfags.

For someone who's been here for 4 years (apparently) you sure are naive.

>>52342271
I've only read two (involing Ui) and a few others in the past. While I did enjoy reading some, I wasn't happy with what they did with Ui.

Fuck off.

>>52342266
>Well that's frankly impossible you know

It...really isn't UiDrew. I am sorry, but it isn't. Ignoring things is easy.

>this thread

>>52342266
>That bottom picture isn't SFW as it implies she's having sex.
Well, I'd guess we'd better stop saying fuck and faggot, we don't want to offend all the children on the board with VULGARITIES AND IMPLIED SEX of all things.

>>52342219
>/a/ related
Doesn't. Fucking. Matter.

It's reposted constantly and is spam. People don't post this image anymore with good intentions. They do it to stir shit up. It's against the rules, deal with it.

>>52342248
I was using sage, but there's no point if everybody else just bumps this shit anyways.

>>52342266
It doesn't imply sex anywhere, why can't YOU read? I genuinely don't think you know what sex means. Unless you perceive it as sexual, it isn't sexual at all.

Also, you wouldn't report that image if it weren't for your feelings.

>>52342136
>i'm doing the right thing

haha. oh, wow! mr whiteknight now, aren't we?
kiddo, your waifu being a slut is /a/ related. the image of a behaviour of fictional character from an anime is, gess what, /a/related. if you don't like it it's not my problem, but i sincerely hope you get banned for shit-reporting and clogging that function with spam report. that's right, you are spamming the report fucntion by using the mods as your personal army. jesus, grow a pair to not feel threatened by other's opninion and fuck off.

>>52342299
Never seen you report K-ON /c/ dumps which, as the name implies, belong in /c/. Oh wait, you only obey the rules when it's beneficial to you, right?

>>52342291
Well all I usually plan to do is say "reported" and move on.

>>52342294
Your forgetting that we aren't talking about reality here. We are talking about that Azusa picture and how most doujin's show tears when having sex through pleasure.

>>52342298
I'm noy a child though. If it were posted in the right board, I wouldn't give a fuck.

>>52342314
I'm not going to bother arguing with you. If you can't see that the pictures shows she's having sex, or if you can't look at his other art, then you clearly need to do so because frankly my dear, you annoy me.

>>52342315
If that were true I'd be banned right now. And I only use the report button if it's not /a/related or if it's spam / against the rules.

>>52342260
Not really. If people have their thread deleted and they don't know why, they'll just recreate it. The only way to teach them a lesson is to give them a ban, and you know how rare that is.

>>52342271
Except I don't and have never admitted anything like that. I don't have a single image of Azusa saved that's has a man in it or is excessively lewd.

>>52342342
I've also never seen you report Horo threads / Miku threads when they are all just "imagedumps".

hypocrite.

>>52342352
>Well all I usually plan to do is say "reported" and move on.

That is progress. Reporting, not commenting, then moving on, is the next stage.

>>52342299
Ugh... You're incredibly insufferable, but at least you know when you're shitposting and when a thread shouldn't be bumped.

/a/, sage isn't some super duper mean insult. Just use it, please. Fucking hell. Do you even read these posts? God.

Come to think of it, is Rule 34 of Azusa even allowed on /h/? I know she's not really a loli, but /h/ is the most draconian place on 4chan so I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't allowed.

>>52342369
I never trip. I'm anonymous. How are you supposed to know what or what I don't do? God you're moronic.

>>52342342
Posting images isn't against the rules. If it was nothing but images being dumped, sure, but there is almost always some discussion to go along with it.

>>52342409
>discussing a cute girl show after it has finished airing
Pretty sure all the discussion is "she's so cute in that picture!". And we have a board specifically for cute image dumps. /c/ isn't redundant.

>>52342352
Still, the image is worksafe. You're getting butthurt over implied sex with nothing shown. Grow up.

>>52342399
Azusa isn't a loli at all, she's just short and has small breasts. If /h/ doesn't even accept a girl as mature as her then that place shouldn't even exist.

>>52342459
>worksafe.

It's not though. I will have to admit the artist is clearly sneaky by merely showing the top picture only. but you have to be a fool if you think it's SFW.

>You're getting butthurt over implied sex with nothing shown.

Read earlier statement please.

>Grow up.

You first. I'm getting tired of listening to your idiotic logic on thinking it's "SFW" when it clearly isn't.

Why not take a look at the Mugi / Ritsu one. That's right, you can't because you know I'm right

>>52342438
Not from what I've seen. It's usually discussion with images to go along with it. The discussion rarely ever shifts to the images themselves.

>>52342438
What aboout S & W? There's never going to be a s3 (no matter what people say) yet I see shitty discussion about it on here when I'm certain it ended already.

And K-ON! hasn't ended yet. Manga continued.

>>52342508
Well azuslut.jpg always sparks discussion so it should be fine according to your logic.

And I've been in K-ON image dumps on /a/ before. It's almost always 15-20 pictures then a single picture-less sentence. The only discussion that could occur would have had to have been back when the new manga was announced.

Not sure why but this thread is giving me the urge to choke the shit out of someone

>>52342500
We should all make /a/ as child friendly as possible. Why not invite gaia over now that we've got rid of all those pesky "naked from the shoulders up" pictures.

>Read earlier statement please.
So, you're complaining that it's an edited version of a non worksafe picture, but with the actual sex taken out?

>>52342553
Korbo isn't /c/ though. Nor /e/ nor /h/ nor /d/ etc. So where else can you have SnW dumps? K-ON is /c/ material.

>>52342598
Just get out of it then. Do the board and yourself a favor.

>basement dwellers who will never get a job complaining about NSFW pictures

>>52342602
Now you've clearly taken the logic out of my words with that.

Take another look at the picture, it clearly shows Azusa is having sex. Don't believe me? Look at the other two.

I don't think it's an editited picture.

>>52342607
Funny how I've seen horo threads on /c/ all the time and nothing is done about it. Fact is, if it's merely an imagedump with no discussion, it goes to /c/. And K-ON! is still going on so it's still /a/ related.

>>52342568
>Well azuslut.jpg always sparks discussion
It doesn't. All it sparks are tired one-liners like "what a slut", "she'd do anything for money", etc. There isn't any discussion there. They're just knocking on the character for no reason, and frankly it pisses me off when the character is the complete opposite of that. Sure I could ignore it (and I do most of the time), but it doesn't make any difference. People will just bump the thread and post their shit regardless of whether me or Uidrew posts in it.

K-ON image dumps aren't that common anymore, either. Most of the threads are about the characters, new manga chapters, and new people trying out the series. I haven't seen an image dump in weeks. If all they are doing is posting images, then yeah, it's against the rules, but I hardly ever see that happen.

Anime fans were asked to identify the anime with the most annoying fanbases.

1. K-ON! (263)
2. Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica (204)
3. To Aru Index/Railgun (141)
4. Angel Beats! (102)
5. Mahou Shoujo Lyrical Nanoha (74)
6. Neon Genesis Evangelion (71)
7. Ore no Imouto (70)
8. Durarara!! (55)
9. A Channel (14)
10. Gundam Seed (7)

>>52342500
>Why not take a look at the Mugi / Ritsu one. That's right, you can't
Sure I can. It doesn't show anything.

>>52342685
Yes it does.

Look at Mugi's expression. Look at the bed. And look at her hands entwined with a guy's. That clearly shows sex here (but the artist has clearly done a small version of it).

You aren't fooling anyone. It's NSFW

>>52342664
Like /c/ is going to throw a fit over Holo.

>Fact is, if it's merely an imagedump with no discussion, it goes to /c/
If it's /c/ute shit then yes of course.

to sum it up: kome is an attention whore who needs to boast "i reported it too!" and defends kon threads, while uidre is simply a retard who can't help but get butt hurt by his own dirty thoughts about a fictional character, and also can't tell a SFW picture to save his life.

kome 6/10
ui i/10

>>52342739
>That clearly shows sex here
Except it doesn't show sex.

>>52342769
>blushing.
>drooling.
>tears.
>nude.
>man hands to the side doing her.

While it may not be a big picture, you clearly are stupid if you think that picture doesn't show sex.

Try again.

>>52342788
my my, what a dirty mind you have there.
naughty naughty!

>>52342788
>blushing.
>drooling.
>tears.
>nude.
>man hands to the side doing her.
While it may not be a big picture, you clearly are stupid if you think that picture doesn't imply sex.

Try again.

Do you even know the difference between implicit and explicit?
How old are you? Really.

>>52342837
So what if I've got a dirty mind? If this was posted elsewhere, I wouldn't have bothered.

>>52342840
No, I think that's what I should be asking you. You clearly are blind if you think that picture doesn't show she's having sex.

Why don't you show it to your parent's?

>>52342869
To many parent's what?

>>52342912
Show them >>52342769 <--- I can assure you they'd also think she'd be having sex with someone.

For it not to be a sex picture, that picture woudl need to be editited and sorted.

>>52342869
I don't live with my parents

I'll gladly ask my brother whether or not the picture shows implicit or explicit sex, right now if you like.

Nice work avoiding answering how old you really are by the way, and assuming that I still lived with my parents, because you probably do.

So, want me to go ask someone with a functioning brain if that Azusa picture physically shows her having sex or if it just implies it?

>>52342912
He's too stupid to get the joke, don't worry about it.

Tripfag argument! It's like I'm really in summer!

>>52342936
>Nice work avoiding answering how old you really are by the way, and assuming that I still lived with my parents, because you probably do.

I live with my mother. And I bet you'd love to hear if I was underage right? Well I've got news for you son, I'm twenty one.

Like I've said previously - if that were posted on another board, I would not have bothered my arse one bit.

If you think I'm retarded as fuck, then why would you need to? It's obviously that you think it's not her having sex (when she really is). You've just brought this argument out too much for it's own good.

I've gave out my reasons and you've shot them down because you are too "blind". She's having sex. end of story (and interest in this thread lost).

Don't care what you do now. But I hope you enjoy talking to yourself.

I don't mind porn, but I do mind when it's posted on the wrong fucking board. Don't like me reporting stuff? grow up and man up.

>>52343026
Woah, you seem pretty mad there.
I'm not saying she's not having sex. Read what I wrote again.

>>52343026
I thought you were 18

>>52343026
people like you make me sick

>>52342788
>>52342869
>>52342932

Full_retarded.jpg

Yes it's implied sex, we can all fucking see that. Does the image explicitly show sexual intercourse? Absolutely not.

lrn2differentiate

>>52343026
Why do you do this to yourself?

>>52343051
Komeiji is the one that's 18, not me.

>>52343065
People like you disgust me.

>>52343046
Nice try. But you tripped yourself up here at >>52342769 <---. It may not show it (because it's not a bigger picture), but if you don't think she's having sex right now, then it makes you an idiot.

And yes I am mad. I'm tired of brainless idiots like you.

>>52343104
Sex is not shown, but implied.

Guys, seriosuly? Is all of this fighting necessary?

>>52343102
Because I'm tired of idiots who think she's not having sex and that it's NSFW.

>>52343093
The picture isn't big enough to "prove" she's having sex. But looking at the picture and the state of it shows sex.

>Uidrew at his computer

>>52343133
OF COURSE IT IS!

FOR VALHALLA!!!

>>52343026
Hey, just asked my brother, who has no interest in anime whatsoever, whether or not that picture showed or implied sex, to solve an internet argument.

He replied, and I quote;
>Well, it's implied, heavily implied, but it doesn't show anything. I hope you win your internet argument.

>>52343169
Implied or not, it still shows her having sex (but the artist clearly has been sneaky on not making it big).

>>52343169
>I hope you win your internet argument.

Bro of the year.

>>52343104
It's obvious she's having sex, you fucking, fuuuuucking retard.

I'm saying it doesn't SHOW her having sex. Please point out where the penis is entering her vagina in that picture.

Uidrew = YotsubaC

>>52342681
>9. A Channel (14)
What? We may not be gentlemen, but we're not nearly as bad as some fanbases that aren't on that list, like Milky Holmes.

It doesn't fucking matter what the image implies or shows. It's the fact that people repost it constantly to spam the board and start shit that is the problem.

>>52343200
I can't since the picture obviously wasn't made that size.

>It's obvious she's having sex, you fucking, fuuuuucking retard.

Nice of you to admit that and further proving my point that it's NSFW and doesn't belong on /a/.

>>52343184
>Implied or not, it still shows her having sex
Ha. Wow.

>>52343141
>The picture isn't big enough to "prove" she's having sex. But looking at the picture and the state of it shows sex.

Okay, now you're just trying to save face on an argument you know you've lost.

The meaning of material that is implicit in it's meaning is subjective to each individual observer of said material. Who are you to decide what I think? Hell, maybe in my eye, she's actually riding a pony with someone in the dark with no shirt on. However I can't know that for sure because the material is IMPLIED.

>>52343241
I've seen loads of images posted here that aren't worksafe. Why all the fuss over that one?