Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject []
Comment
Verification
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • i'm stopping by the datacenter in los angeles on tuesday to work on the servers. site might be down for a few minutes while maintenance is performed. i'll take pictures of the rack—if you want to say hi~, e-mail moot@4chan.org

    File : 1288032456.jpg-(773 KB, 1115x2751, 1287546282493.jpg)
    773 KB MADHOUSE DEAD Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:47 No.41708119  
    http://twitter.com/sudotadashi/status/27909450618

    Madhouse has confirmed that they are filing for bankruptcy through their official twitter.
    A Madhouse spokesman had this to say:
    >The Anime Otaku have turned a specific type of anime into their obsession, and it kills diversity. While we don't want to point any fingers, studios like Kyoto Animation exploit this fact and only worsen the problem.

    When asked if a return was possible, the spokesman said it was unlikely due to their unpleasant time dealing with the market.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:48 No.41708137
    slowking.png
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:48 No.41708141
    'Sup gorespammer?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:48 No.41708148
    1/10
    you made me check
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:49 No.41708153
    >>41708119
    Reported for spam.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:49 No.41708155
    >>41708137
    >he played pokemon after the first generation
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:49 No.41708167
         File1288032570.gif-(553 KB, 280x210, 1287729314107.gif)
    553 KB
    hey guys check this out
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:49 No.41708168
         File1288032571.png-(70 KB, 288x356, noshit.png)
    70 KB
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:50 No.41708209
    >>41708167
    What the fuck?
    He got up right away?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:50 No.41708215
    It's your fault for shitting all over Iron Man and Wolverine, MadHouse.
    Maybe if you went back to animating interesting shows, you would be a bit better money-wise.

    I love both MadHouse and SHAFT, by the way.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:51 No.41708237
    >>41708209
    Like a boss
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:52 No.41708239
    >>41708167
    how the fuck?!
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:52 No.41708242
    >>41708155
    >he didn't play gold/silver
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:52 No.41708255
    >>41708215
    Marvel paid them to do those fucktard.
    I'm sick of you assholes bringing that up.
    Those anime weren't good anyway
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:53 No.41708268
         File1288032787.jpg-(35 KB, 416x431, trollthread.jpg)
    35 KB
    >>41708119
    OP is a faggot.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:53 No.41708281
    Moe wins. Go home haters, your time is over.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:53 No.41708286
    >>41708167
    Bike HP
    >350/1000

    Chinese guy HP
    >97/100
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:55 No.41708307
    Reported
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:55 No.41708309
    >>41708209
    >>41708237
    >>41708239
    The thing is, and that's not really clear in the gif, they guy is actually landing on his feet. He did a somersault and landed on his feet. Of course he fucking struggled and more or less ran, but he didn't crash to the ground.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:55 No.41708310
    >>41708281
    moe wins, anime loses
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:55 No.41708315
    >>41708281
    >Moe wins. Go home haters, your time is over.

    You:
    >An argumentum ad crumenam argument, also known as an argument to the purse, is a logical fallacy of concluding that a statement is correct because the speaker is rich (or that a statement is incorrect because the speaker is poor).
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:55 No.41708316
    >>41708310
    It's true
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:55 No.41708320
    >>41708209
    >>41708239
    He probably rolled perfectly, just got a couple bruises.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:56 No.41708332
    >>41708310
    >Implying moe shows are not best shows
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:56 No.41708336
    >>41708309
    Is he Jackie Chan?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:57 No.41708347
    >>41708281
    >Implying half of the shows on the left aren't moe as fuck
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:58 No.41708366
    >>41708347
    Name them.
    Because I think you're retarded
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:58 No.41708368
         File1288033089.gif-(1.97 MB, 265x192, 1282206870342.gif)
    1.97 MB
    >>41708167

    check this out
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:58 No.41708383
    This thread again.
    Is /a/ still getting trolled by it?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:59 No.41708395
    >>41708368
    I hate that one. I hope you get hurt
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)14:59 No.41708403
    /care
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:00 No.41708420
    All whatever bullshit aside, it would really be great if there were more late-night or OVA anime that werent just masturbatory otaku pandering fetishism crap. We have seen so many cute girls doing cute things, do you think we can move on? Can we have some shows that are more than just a vehicle for porn doujins?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:00 No.41708430
    Yutaka Yamamoto, former KyoAni director, on the state of the anime industry:
    >Nowadays, good animation doesn't good sales, most otakus barely even notice good animation quality, only sakuga fags happy to see animation
    >For example, Denno Coil and Birdy: Decode sale fail to live up to sakuga fags's hype, compare to Bakemonogatari and Railgun win the Otaku market.
    >Your anime is always going to end up on Youtube. We're reaching the end of being able to sell home video. We're probably going to back to toy-funded business models of past: give anime away, try to sell toys.
    >The lack of originality and the desire for exclusivity by the fandom has created a highly transparent industry. Mr Yamamoto affirms that the creators and the fans are “too close.” This is the biggest reason behind the isolation of the anime industry. The creators feel too obligated to please their fans, and the fans naturally expect the creators of anime to cater to them specifically, as opposed to society at large. This negative feedback loop simply exacerbates the problem over time, and now we have an industry that has boxed itself into a dead end.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:00 No.41708433
    >>41708366
    Casshern sins, kaiji/akgi, kaiba, texhnolyze
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:01 No.41708439
    >check twitter comment
    >no mention of KyoAni. Just stuff about money.
    hmm, well it does say it was said by a MadHouse spokesman. Maybe hat specific statement isn't from Twitter.
    >Google the statement.
    >only /a/ threads and a forum post (clearly copypasting from /a/) come up
    I see...
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:01 No.41708454
    >>41708433
    >Texhnolyze
    You didn't watch it? Did you.
    I'll give you Kaiba in a way and Kaiji and Akagi depend on the purpose, but when you said Texhnolyze it became obvious you're talking out of your ass.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:01 No.41708458
    Fake and reported again like every other time.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:03 No.41708500
    What is killing anime in your opinion?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:04 No.41708520
    >>41708500
    Nothing.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:04 No.41708530
    >>41708454
    A show can't be moe you fucking idiot, moe is not a genre. You're both talking shit.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:05 No.41708534
    >>41708520
    You think anime is as good now as it always was?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:05 No.41708556
    >>41708530
    I can call a show that focuses on moe, "moe" if I want.
    Fuck off.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:06 No.41708573
    >>41708556
    i can call a cat a dog, doesn't mean i'm right
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:07 No.41708580
    >You are reporting post 41708119 on /a/.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:08 No.41708592
    >>41708573
    OK FINE.
    I define the word ome to mean shows that focus on moe.
    Texhnolyze is not ome
    I win
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:08 No.41708606
    >>41708534
    This year is not very good, but that doesn't mean anime is dying. Shit shows have always been produced en masse and good ones are months apart.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:08 No.41708608
         File1288033726.jpg-(503 KB, 942x939, 1142744908578.jpg)
    503 KB
    >>41708454
    >texhnolyze isn't moe
    It is, look at the character that made 95% of it, and the best part of it? You probably didn't notice it was moefying the FUCK out of you, yet it probably still left a hole in your chest by the time the series was over
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:08 No.41708610
    Derpfag status
    [X] TOLD
    [X] TROAHLD
    [X] BUETRANGED
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:09 No.41708620
    >>41708606
    I'll admit that 2007-2008 was great but other than that 00s pretty much sucked with the small exception being 03 maybe.
    IMO the best concentration of shows were in the late 90s
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:09 No.41708626
    >>41708119
    that picture is so sad. i dont even like all those madhouse anime, but the stuff on the right is so much worse.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:10 No.41708636
    >>41708556
    >something can focus on a subjective feeling

    I don't think so.


    Also this has been posted like 100 times in two days, the post is about something else entirely, Madhouse is not going bankrupt, Madhouse has even done "moe" shows, and has said they will do more of them if people come to them with shows like that they want animated.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:10 No.41708639
    Old as shit, also nothing in that tweet about bankruptcy.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:11 No.41708671
    >>41708636
    I'm not posting about the OP.
    Alsp people call things that focus on subjective feelings all the time.
    People call shows comedy even though they don't find it funny.
    But it's clear the creators intended it to be a comedy
    Likewise you can call shows moe because it's clear the creators intended to invoke certain emotions
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:12 No.41708692
    >>41708620
    98-99 were very good, but I believe 2006-7 were just as great. Early 00s were indeed rather bad, but early 90s were just plain horrible. Let's just hope 2011 will be good again.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:15 No.41708724
    >>41708671

    No you can't because it's like calling love a genre.

    You are an idiot as well as anyone else who takes this thread seriously or tries to use it as a basis for their nostalgiafagging.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:16 No.41708746
    >>41708724
    And here's yotsuba, criticizing the use of the word moe and calling other people nostalgia fags in the same post and somehow making the thread worse.
    Well done.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:16 No.41708751
         File1288034184.jpg-(206 KB, 640x855, 1990chart.jpg)
    206 KB
    >>41708620

    >IMO the best concentration of shows were in the late 90s

    Which is complete bullshit.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:16 No.41708752
    >>41708671
    Comedy isn't a feeling, though. Its a genre.

    It'd be like calling a show that you liked the characters in a "Like" show, or calling a show you could relate with the characters in a "relate" show.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:17 No.41708770
    >>41708724
    >No you can't because it's like calling love a genre.
    Worst analogy I've ever heard of in my life

    >>41708751
    >late 90s
    >1990
    Are you retarded?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:17 No.41708772
    >>41708751
    >1990
    >late 90s
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:18 No.41708789
         File1288034296.jpg-(273 KB, 640x1255, 1991chart.jpg)
    273 KB
    >>41708770
    >>41708772

    Except that was intentional. I'm posting them in order.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:18 No.41708809
         File1288034337.png-(111 KB, 993x1180, Your move, moetards.png)
    111 KB
    >>41708608
    A show having moe (a majority, actually) is not the same as being "moeshit" (a show whose only value is the generic "cuteness" of the characters, and has the plot/premise as an excuse to have said moeblobs, lacks anything close to character development and the humor is close to non-existant), such as K-On.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:19 No.41708820
    >>41708752
    It's called a comedy because the creators intend to make you laugh

    I can call a show moe because the creators intend to invoke certain emotions.

    It's the same thing.
    2ch uses the word moe to refer to those shows. The only reason /a/ doesn't want to is because people would use it to make fun of them. And that's stupid because they're going to make fun of you regardless.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:19 No.41708821
         File1288034361.jpg-(212 KB, 550x1125, 1993chart.jpg)
    212 KB
    >>41708770

    >Worst analogy I've ever heard of in my life

    Good job proving you don't understand the word moe even further
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:19 No.41708825
    >>41708789
    Like you always do, diligently ignoring the fact that it was the golden age for OVAs.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:19 No.41708834
    >>41708821
    Good argument.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:20 No.41708843
    >>41708809
    So basically, if it has moe and you like it, it isn't moeshit, but if it has moe and you don't like it, it is.

    Cool story, bro.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:20 No.41708847
         File1288034421.jpg-(252 KB, 550x1390, 1992chart.jpg)
    252 KB
    >>41708809

    >trying to force moeshti as a valid term against anything he doesn't like

    derp
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:20 No.41708857
    >>41708825
    Still waiting on your chart for the golden age of OVAs.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:21 No.41708870
    >>41708843
    That's not the same guy you were originally arguing with.
    If you want to think Ran is moe than fine, I just really didn't.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:21 No.41708877
         File1288034503.jpg-(119 KB, 500x500, 1283217954894.jpg)
    119 KB
    >>41708825
    Just make it yourself.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:22 No.41708884
    >>41708821
    >Hello Kitty
    >Sailor Moon
    >Slam Dunk
    >Mobile Suit Victory Gundam
    1993, year of the decade.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:22 No.41708887
         File1288034531.jpg-(240 KB, 550x1260, 1994chart.jpg)
    240 KB
    >>41708825

    No, the "golden age" for OVAs was the late 80s. Try again
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:22 No.41708888
    >>41708857
    Babby expects a chart? Too lazy to look shit up by yourself?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:22 No.41708894
    >>41708877
    >>41708857
    Someone started making the chart with the OVAs.
    It's going to take a while since there were so many, but yeah, the 90s had a ton.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:22 No.41708898
    >>41708888
    Babby can't make a chart? Too lazy to support your argument?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:23 No.41708909
    >>41708847
    It's an specific category. I don't like, say, Gaogaigar, but I'm not that stupid to call it moeshit. If you think so, well, you're really naive.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:23 No.41708911
         File1288034610.jpg-(296 KB, 730x1125, 1996chart.jpg)
    296 KB
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:24 No.41708918
    >>41708884
    >Yu Yu Hakusho
    >Shin-chan
    >original Sailor Moon
    Ok nevermind, 1992 wins.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:24 No.41708921
    Anyone else think it's funny that Yotsuba posts these charts without comments as though we're supposed to realize that the 90s sucked by ourselves or something?
    As far as I can tell they were great.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:24 No.41708924
    >>41708898
    Oh yes, let me just rush to make a chart for an anonymous dipshit on the internet, because he demands it.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:24 No.41708928
    >>41708909
    Moeshit is just a vague buzzword used to label things you don't like.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:25 No.41708937
    >>41708924
    I'm waiting on it. Don't be a dipshit and fail to deliver, anon.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:25 No.41708942
         File1288034718.jpg-(298 KB, 640x1322, 1997chart.jpg)
    298 KB
    >>41708894

    Except there are more OVAs now than there were in the 90s. If you knew anything you would know that. The difference is that now a larger majority of them are hentai OVAs.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:26 No.41708964
    Whenever I see these charts posted I always wonder how anime could have progressed out of the pure shit that is the 90s, filled with mostly younger kid shows. How it could have gone downhill from the 80s, although the 80s weren't that good either.

    Then I came to a conclusion, everyone bitching about "hurr durr moe" should just wait another 10 years, and anime should in theory be in a completely different state from then.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:26 No.41708969
    >>41708942
    Why would we want to include the hentai OVAs?
    Of course I knew that.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:27 No.41708975
         File1288034826.jpg-(445 KB, 1000x1395, 1998chart.jpg)
    445 KB
    >>41708921

    I never try to post these charts to prove the 90s "sucked". I don't believe the 90s "sucked" because I don't look at eras like that.

    >>41708909

    No, that isn't a "specific category". It's a bullshit category used by people who can't make real arguments against a show and need to rely on vague buzzwords like yourself.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:27 No.41708976
    >>41708368
    Dude, i was fucking eating.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:27 No.41708985
    Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm, from looking at those charts I think it's easy to conclude that anime hasn't gotten significantly better or worse.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:27 No.41708991
    >>41708928
    No, it is not. Is an specific term, with clearly defined values that not all shows (whether I like them or not) fulfill.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:28 No.41708999
    >>41708975
    Then why are you posting charts without comment?
    Do you have an argument of some sort.
    I'm confused, please tell me the purpose
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:28 No.41709000
         File1288034886.jpg-(476 KB, 820x1795, 1999chart.jpg)
    476 KB
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:28 No.41709007
         File1288034904.jpg-(285 KB, 1500x1216, 1268247229571.jpg)
    285 KB
    >>41708921
    >On average about 1-2 shows each year that are still relevant
    >good

    Seriously, you could not make a chart like this for the 90s, it just didn't have enough actually good shows.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:28 No.41709009
    >>41708985
    Of course, that is the entire point. It's amazing how people get all defensive when they are presented with charts, sales figures or whatnot.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:29 No.41709030
    >>41708991
    No, it is not. It is a vague buzzword, with user-defined values that are fulfilled by all the shows the user doesn't like.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:29 No.41709041
    >>41708975
    Why are there suddnely 9000 anime airing in 1998, and why are there so many good ones?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:29 No.41709042
         File1288034999.png-(90 KB, 780x1334, Yotsuba°C.png)
    90 KB
    >>41708999
    >Then why are you posting charts without comment?
    It's Yotsuba's usual way to "argument". Read this.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:30 No.41709047
         File1288035007.jpg-(973 KB, 1020x1120, 2000-export-2.jpg)
    973 KB
    >>41708999

    They are to give perspective. A more objective view of the past and present. Nostalgiafags like to depend on vague ideas of how things "used to be".
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:30 No.41709050
    Yotsuba C, after looking at these charts I have determined that the best years in anime are 1997-1999
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:31 No.41709087
    >>41709007
    The overwhelming majority of that is shit.
    Fuck off with your opinions.
    The truth is you don't even recognize most of the anime on the 90s list.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:32 No.41709095
    You're all full of shit until i'm presented with pie charts. Pie charts damn it.

    Now get the hell out of my office.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:32 No.41709101
         File1288035129.jpg-(1.49 MB, 1732x1196, tornado112907.jpg)
    1.49 MB
    >Yotsuba4c
    >the Anonymous who feed him
    >the word "moe"
    I am out of here
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:32 No.41709113
    >>41709087
    >implying anyone does
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:32 No.41709114
         File1288035169.jpg-(974 KB, 1165x1750, 2001-export.jpg)
    974 KB
    >>41709041

    >Why are there suddnely 9000 anime airing in 199

    Because it's when late night anime started to really catch on

    >and why are there so many good ones?

    There really aren't. Not in comparison to the larger years of the 00s with the main thing I see here is that they contain a lot of anime that were big on American TV in the early 00s.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:33 No.41709119
    >>41709047
    That list looks better than the whole of 2010 and the second half of 2009 combined.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:33 No.41709123
    >>41709087
    The overwhelming majority of that is decent to good.
    Fuck off with you're opinions.
    The truth is you don't even recognize most of the anime on the 00s list.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:33 No.41709128
    >>41709050

    and anime from 2002 to 2010

    lets face it, people tend to called 4 or 5 good shows from such decades to be the best while ignoring other names.

    and yet they first watching it 3 or 10 years after that show first aired.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:34 No.41709150
    >>41709123
    Only I do recognize all of them.
    Nice try.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:34 No.41709151
         File1288035269.jpg-(937 KB, 1120x1620, 2002export.jpg)
    937 KB
    >>41709050

    And you would have to be nostlagiafagging pretty hard to actually believe that--ignoring that 98 is the best year for TV anime of the 90s.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:34 No.41709152
    >>41709119
    The late 90s were the golden age, remember it was the pokemon boom.

    Simply compare the amount of anime that aired, and you can clearly see that many more aired in 98 than today.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:34 No.41709157
    >>41709007

    Obviously the 2000s would have more "relevant" anime because 1) there was more anime overall and 2) the 90s are further removed in time.

    Some series really don't belong on that chart. Nyan Koi and Hakaba Kitaro, for starters.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:34 No.41709160
    Is Madhouse really dead or is this just a troll? Does this mean no Kaiji season 2?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:35 No.41709164
    >>41708985

    That's actually the point. There is a retarded subsection of /a/ that nostalgiafags and claims that the 80s or 90s or whenever was better than now. Because they forget all the worthless shit, and gather several years of shows for the comparison to whatever is on now. When you actually look at it, theat complaint doesn't hold any water.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:35 No.41709167
    >>41709152
    >more shows aired in 98 than today
    not sure if trolling...
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:35 No.41709174
    >>41709151
    I don't nostalgiafag.
    Best years for anime were the late 90s.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:35 No.41709177
    >>41709150
    Only I do recognize all of them.
    Nice try.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:35 No.41709181
    >>41709128
    2010 has been pretty damn poor. Anime reached its latest peak during 2007. Now it's on a recession. I wonder when it'll begin to rise again.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:36 No.41709198
         File1288035368.jpg-(1.36 MB, 1260x1690, 2003-export.jpg)
    1.36 MB
    >>41709152

    >Simply compare the amount of anime that aired, and you can clearly see that many more aired in 98 than today.

    Good job pulling shit out of your ass.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:36 No.41709203
    >>41709177
    Only you don't.
    Nice try.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:37 No.41709224
    >>41709203
    Only you don't.
    Nice try.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:37 No.41709239
         File1288035463.jpg-(18 KB, 267x273, idontthinksotim.jpg)
    18 KB
    >>41709119

    What? 2000-2002 was probably a nadir for good anime. 8/10 if troll.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:37 No.41709241
    >>41709224
    Only you don't.
    Nice try.­
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:38 No.41709251
    >>41709241
    Only you don't.
    Nice try.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:38 No.41709279
    >>41709181

    its just anime, you think there are "many" so called "good shows" in the 90-95?

    lets face it, anime industry is not diffrent than any TV show industry in other country.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:39 No.41709289
    >>41709203
    >>41709224
    >>41709241
    >>41709251
    We've entered an endless recursion of time.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:39 No.41709298
    >>41709262
    The problem with you is that you take everything at face value and can't accept the opinions of others if it conflicts with your own.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:39 No.41709303
    >>41709151
    Worst year posted so far.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:39 No.41709304
    >>41709262
    Yes it has.
    There are no memorable good shows.
    You just don't care because you are easily impressed by shit.
    I never see you make fun of a single show. Why? Because you like it all. You're like a kid that is entertained by the moving colors.
    So you prefer the later years because there are more shows.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:39 No.41709305
    Judging by years of experience with anime fans I'd say that:

    Average Moefag
    Usually 20+yo, have a huge experience in anime, watched the shit out of DEEP normalfag titles years ago, now mostly watches ongoing anime for that fuzzy nghhh feeling, but not limited to it and can discuss various genres with arguments.

    Average Moehater:
    Normalfag, or close to it, <200 titles watched, have normalfag expectations of anime similar to movies.
    OR
    Underaged b& thinking that media aimed at teenagers really has deep intricate plots, and not DEEP.
    Optionally: Yaoi fangirl
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:39 No.41709307
         File1288035588.jpg-(641 KB, 1180x1717, 2004chartv2.jpg)
    641 KB
    >>41709181

    >2010 has been pretty damn poor.

    It hasn't. The problem is you and other people lack the ability to appreciate things while they're in process. It's funny because people were saying the same shit back in 06 and 07 when we had the most anime ever. Then now a few years later people recognize how many great anime they had.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:41 No.41709335
    >>41709305
    No ones even arguing about moe
    What are you talking about?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:41 No.41709341
    >>41709304
    >memorable, good shows = things I like
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:41 No.41709349
    >>41709042
    Are you the same person who insist on using the word "moetard"? You know it makes you seem stupid when you misuse terms and try to use that as a proper argument.
    >He alikes K-on very much
    And why the fuck do you care? Why are you bringing that up as if it would instantly "win" the debate, it's just a show for fuck's sake. And no, I didn't watch K-on so don't bother replying with "u mad moefag???"

    Let people enjoy what they want, is it seriously that hard?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:42 No.41709354
    >>41709341
    Yes, good job figuring that out.
    You all do the same thing.
    You think the shows today are better than they used to be.
    I don't.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:42 No.41709363
    >>41709262
    Yep, I lack the abilities to appreciate things. Thank you for suddenly knowing who I am, what I watched and what I like.
    No, I never said 2007 was bad. 2007 was one of the most glorious years for TV anime, and I realized it during and after. Shit, I still have stuff left to watch from that year on my hard drive.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:43 No.41709376
    Deja vu
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:43 No.41709379
         File1288035789.jpg-(188 KB, 1118x1193, animu.jpg)
    188 KB
    >>41709305
    Pretty accurate, from what I've in most collection list is that people who watch what /a/ calls "moe" are usually the ones with the biggest collections, and almost always idorts.

    One could take me for example, people always call me a "moefag" when I go to defend such shows, yet I'd say my taste are very well rounded. (This picture is kind of old though, its a little bigger now)
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:43 No.41709387
    >>41709354
    Sucks to be you, having missed the entire point of the discussion. See >>41709164>>41709009
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:43 No.41709389
    >>41709354

    carry on then. you don't need to force you opinion on to others because it won't changed anything.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:44 No.41709397
    wheeeeee looks like school finally let out

    see you in 12 hours /a/
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:44 No.41709411
    >>41709389
    I don't you fucktard.
    I said exactly "IMO anime peaked during the late 90s"
    Than yotsuba raged and started posting the charts and arguing like a child.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:44 No.41709422
    >>41709397
    >implying no time zones
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:45 No.41709424
    >>41709411
    Pop quiz: What are these charts supposed to tell us?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:45 No.41709434
    >>41709307
    What???

    I was there in 2007, everyone on /a/ agreed that it was a godly year.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:45 No.41709435
    >>41709411

    I don't think he's mad at all.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:45 No.41709436
    >>41709389
    See this: >>41708620
    And how Yotsuba responded.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:45 No.41709444
    I like how when I used to be a buyfag (read: bought a bunch of DVDs and books only to realize they sit on shelves and collect dust and aren't worth shit barely anymore) everything I own is works made between 90 and 05. I think the most recent series I have is a couple volumes of Shana and Rozen Maiden. When I was going through what I wanted to sell, I kept most of the older shit that I liked, such as Lost Universe, Nadesico, and Angelic Layer.

    Good times.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:46 No.41709445
         File1288035961.jpg-(623 KB, 1180x1710, 2005chartv2.jpg)
    623 KB
    >>41709304

    >There are no memorable good shows.
    Yes, even though the oldest shows of the year have been barely finished for 6 months you somehow know how "memorable" they are.

    >You just don't care because you are easily impressed by shit.
    lol okay.

    >I never see you make fun of a single show. Why? Because you like it all. You're like a kid that is entertained by the moving colors.
    You don't know me at all. I criticize plenty of shows. That doesn't mean I need to go around trolling them all the time like some people feel the need to do.

    >So you prefer the later years because there are more shows.
    There other dimensions to it. It's not just about quantity. Yet quantity is important. People would never survive anime in most of the 90s compared to the height of the 00s--much of the 90s where you only have a few shows you can watch each week, and OVA releases were long and in between each episode.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:46 No.41709449
         File1288035974.jpg-(47 KB, 363x612, 1279294186370.jpg)
    47 KB
    >>41709434
    >/a/
    >agree
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:47 No.41709484
         File1288036047.jpg-(888 KB, 1540x1862, 2006chart.jpg)
    888 KB
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:47 No.41709497
         File1288036075.jpg-(25 KB, 225x350, 101080.jpg)
    25 KB
    Excellent news. I have to admit this happened sooner than I expected.

    See this haters? THIS is what the Moe lolis did to you. Remember, Moe lolis did this to YOU.

    Nostalgiafags aren't Otaku nor anime fans, just pretentious normalfags wanting to act cool talking about 'culture' anime like if it is some exotic stuff just like the old Europeans talked about their Safaris on Africa. That, in order to be alpha enough to get laid.

    But now what happens? They will have to talk every year about more and more prehistoric anime, proving they don't know shit about anime.

    For the preservation of a pure and moe world!
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:48 No.41709508
    >>41709445
    You know a show is memorable when you finish it retard.
    I've known after I've finished every show how memorable each one was.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:48 No.41709510
    where do you get all this chart?

    chartfag blog doesn't have it all.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:48 No.41709521
    >>41709379

    Are you me from the future with a bigger hard drive?
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:49 No.41709523
         File1288036144.jpg-(727 KB, 1180x1845, 2007chart (2).jpg)
    727 KB
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:49 No.41709541
    >>41709181

    I don't think 2007 was great, but it was definitely one of the better years in the last decade. Just like everything else there is a pattern of uprise and decline in quality, and we just happen to hit a low this year.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:49 No.41709545
    >>41709508
    Protip: What's memorable for you may not be memorable for others.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:49 No.41709548
    >moe anime are shit


    OH I KNOW I'LL POST A LOAD OF CHARTS OF ANIME IN THE 90s THAT WILL TOTALLY PROVE THEM WRONG
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:50 No.41709561
    That's not what the twitter message says at all.

    Fucking sick of this troll spamming.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:50 No.41709565
    >>41709548
    >moe anime
    Don't start it again.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:50 No.41709571
    >>41709561
    Welcome to 150 posts ago
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:50 No.41709573
    Goddammit, who summoned yotsubaC?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:50 No.41709577
    >>41709541

    that aside, this 2 years we got so many good Anime Movies.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:51 No.41709586
    >>41709445
    The thing is, when you had to make this shit by hand, it took time, and you had time to put out something meaningful. Today everything is run on CG, it's not just Japan, the US does it too with cartoons, it's all about how fast you can sling shit into the market and hope it catches. I like some of the "moe" shows out there, but some of these series don't even have stories or plots at all, they just get thrown out there, and if the fans eat that shit up, they'll green light a second season and possibly make it worth a damn.

    It's like watching NBC, in Japan.
    >> Yotsuba℃ !!12SEFhiHDdm 10/25/10(Mon)15:51 No.41709591
    >>41709508

    It really doesn't even matter. Your vague classification of "memorable" is just a way for you to evade having to actually having give real argument. There have been plenty enjoyable shows this season.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:51 No.41709593
    >>41709573
    You expected him to not show up to a thread were KyoAni was mentioned?
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:51 No.41709596
    >>41709541
    2010 has been decent. Spring was pretty high tier, and winter was alright.

    Summer was okay.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:52 No.41709619
    >>41709586

    > when you had to make this shit by hand
    > Today everything is run on CG

    Confirmed for not knowing anything about animation production.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:52 No.41709636
    >>41709591
    Says you.
    I think everything this season is shit.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:53 No.41709644
    >>41709636
    Says you.
    I think everything this season is decent.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:54 No.41709670
    >>41709644
    OK, doesn't mean I have to think the same.
    Yotsuba is trying to convince people that don't like today's shows that they are good.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:54 No.41709673
    >>41709644
    Says you.
    I think only 3-4 shows are decent.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:54 No.41709689
    >>41709619
    >>Foster's Home For Imaginary Friends
    >>Flash

    Not talking about just GLORIOUS NIPPON here, kid.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:55 No.41709699
    you know guys, there's a different between watching anime as a normalfag and as one of /a/ subculture person.

    but who am I kidding in this place that so called the "new /a/"
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:55 No.41709711
    >>41709596

    We had HSOTD as anime of the season at one point, I don't think we had a season that was as horrible as the last one.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:56 No.41709718
    >>41709699
    Cool doubles, bro.
    >> Anonymous 10/25/10(Mon)15:56 No.41709721
    >>41709689
    >Today everything is run on CG, it's not just Japan, the US does it too with cartoons
    >everything
    Come again?



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]AnonymousGenshiken is fi...