Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject []
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1276252093.jpg-(489 KB, 1000x1502, 1274436430885.jpg)
    489 KB Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:28 No.36131082  
    I know /a/ likes to bash on Bakemonogatari, but maybe we should analyze why an unconventional show is that popular.

    My theory is that Bakemonogatari simply caters to multiple audiences. It caters to those that like some depth or obscurity of reference. It caters to those that are sick of the conventional art style. It caters to those that like a different presentation style. It caters to those that like balanced male protagonists (not too wimpy, not too arrogant and strong). It caters to those that like a wide variety of female figures and types, from the aloof tsundere, to the angry grade schooler, from the big-breasted iinchou, to the cute loli. It caters to those that watch a show purely romance (I'm an example of this, and this is why I watched it). It caters to those that watch a show for some level of spiritual mystery. These are just minor categories of things that people might appreciate in Bakemonogatari.

    In terms of how a lot of /a/ might say what I've just said above, but in fewer sentences, it is both DEEP and MOE, so DEEPfags and MOEfags can't help but like the show together.

    Let's compare this show to a currently airing DEEP show: The Tatami Galaxy. The Tatami Galaxy does not cater at all to the MOE market. It's missing both the characters necessary for a MOE presentation, as well as the art style necessary to render beautiful pictures of 2D women. As a result, this show doesn't really bring many types of people together, only niche types. Whether or not it's worthy of credibility as a successful noitaminA title is still in question, but only time will tell.

    Any opinions or comments, /a/?
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:31 No.36131174
    What a lonely thread. Let me reply and bump this to the front page even though I'm not OP.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:33 No.36131211
    tl;dr

    But judging by the first sentence, you like Bakemonogatari too, so I approve of this thread.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:34 No.36131257
         File1276252483.jpg-(24 KB, 340x231, 1262942192.jpg)
    24 KB
    >He watches Bakemonogatari
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:35 No.36131270
    It's useless to discuss Bakemonogatari on /ɐ/ because it will just get flooded with GORESPAMMER LOLZ and other shit like that. Well actually its useless to discuss anything on /ɐ/.

    But I get what your saying OP and I agree.

    Wait like, 5 years, so everyone forgets about the Gorespammer saga and then we could talk about it.

    Also.

    EPISODE 15 FUCKING WHEN???
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:35 No.36131272
    Anon here doesn't bash on Bmg. Maybe gorespammer, trolls, and those who do dislike it might...

    Just to keep it simple: it's an otaku series, and it hits home to many things otaku likes. That, and it had that Shaft-esque style to it, so that made it feel different. I like it for mostly that. And the whole DEEP thing is just trolls implying it's to troll people, and the series. Seriously, it was simple and straightforward, there was nothing deep or DEEP about it.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:36 No.36131283
    >>36131211
    Yes, I do, but I'm more interested in your thoughts on my theory, and what you might think would be a good direction for future shows that are slightly unconventional? Should they be a total mindfuck, or should they maybe follow the MAYA principle (most advanced yet acceptable) -- meaning something that is different, but still enjoyable by a variety of audiences?
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:37 No.36131310
    >>36131257
    >fag who still post dat /sp/ reaction pic in Bmg threads.

    >>36131284
    >>36131299
    >Gorespammer
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:38 No.36131326
    >>36131284
    ohboyherewego.jpg

    I really enjoyed the way Bakemonogatari was presented. Down to the music and the "style" of animation and art used. (Yes I know sideshow, haters gonna hate).

    FACT: ANY PART OF BAKEMONOGATARI CAN BE USED AS A WALLPAPER.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:39 No.36131349
    >>36131272
    For reference, would you be able to come up with a list of things that put Bakemonogatari in a positive light with the otaku audience?

    The first show that comes to mind when people say "otaku audience" (for me, anyhow) is Lucky Star. In particular, Lucky Star dealt with otaku activities such as anime conventions, reading manga, playing eroge, and the like. Bakemonogatari, however, does not really allude to any of these activities, so if it does pander to otaku, then it must be on a different level.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:39 No.36131364
    >>36131334
    >>36131257
    >>36131284
    >>36131299
    >>36131316
    >>36131327
    >Gorespammer
    Reported.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:41 No.36131379
    >>36131326
    Just for viewership's sake, I don't entirely agree with the slide show approach. I think it's fine how they have this progressive slideshow right at the start, before the episode contents unroll, but the bits of text that are presented for only a split second every once in a while during the show are somewhat distracting. I wish they could've extended those sequences.
    >> Bitches & !Whores/8sg 06/11/10(Fri)06:41 No.36131384
    OP, trying to make such an argument here is futile

    either the thread will be deleted or it will get spammed
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:42 No.36131397
    i love you OP
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:44 No.36131449
    Someone explain the appeal behind this.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:44 No.36131457
    >>36131384
    I'm well aware of what happens and it doesn't really bother me as I can consciously ignore posts which don't make sense.

    >>36131394
    There's no point taking my statement out of context. I simply mean that instead of being judged on the level of activities, it might be judged on the level of character personalities, or something else that I haven't thought of. All I'm saying is that it's not apparently obvious why this would be an "otaku show".
    >> Crabster !!M18KC22yq1r 06/11/10(Fri)06:44 No.36131458
    OP has a good point. Also, I did watch because of the romance plot, too. Guess I'm a sucker for that.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:44 No.36131460
    >>36131349
    I mostly say that since the novels were written for towards the otaku demographic. But I guess just the usual general archetypes, tsundere, yandere traits, loli vampire, etc, all whom were doing their roles pretty well. Hitagi in particular with making it feel...fresh, And the fanservice, too, I guess. And then there's the seiyuu and visuals, which were nice.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:44 No.36131468
    >>36131364
    This
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:44 No.36131472
    It's a troll thread.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:45 No.36131499
    >>36131453
    >>36131449
    >>36131415
    >>36131394
    >>36131373
    >Gorespammer again

    Same usual copy'd pasta comments.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:46 No.36131506
    >>36131460
    Because the whole show was based on clearly showing the archetypes. Explains the perfect panty shot in ep 1.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:46 No.36131524
         File1276253202.jpg-(27 KB, 400x282, 1260856314370.jpg)
    27 KB
    >Bakamonogatari
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:46 No.36131529
    >>36131458
    To me, I started watching this show hoping for a romance, got part way into it (up to episode 5) not really thinking too much about romance, since it was fairly subtle. Then, it all hit me at episode 5 when Hitagi said what she said. I think that's a good thing. The show made me forget about what I originally intended, and then came back to it like a nice surprise.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:47 No.36131532
    >Spammers & sage = butthurt faggots
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:47 No.36131533
    Report the thread and the spam posts.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:47 No.36131540
    >>36131384
    Gorespammer: "just as planned"

    Seriously, what's this spammer's fucking problem against Bakemono? It has been almost an entire year of nothing but him trolling and shit.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:47 No.36131547
    No one really hates Bakemonogatari
    It's a legitimately good show
    The only people who hate it are trolls, and people who have hopped on the bandwagon
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:48 No.36131561
    Nobody cares about BMG anymore. Nobody. Nobody.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:48 No.36131579
    >>36131548
    >>36131561
    >>36131547
    >>36131533
    >>36131532
    >>36131524
    >>36131512
    >>36131498
    >Gorespammer trolling/reverse trolling
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:49 No.36131580
    >/a/ likes to bash on Bakemonogatari
    >resident trolls like to bash on Bakemonogatari
    fixed that for you.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:49 No.36131588
    It's to bad we can't have Bake threads for the people who like it. I don't spam shitty K-ON and Strike Witches threads. But it's just part of /ɐ/'s faggotry.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:49 No.36131590
    >>36131460
    >>36131506
    Well, the question is, can you actually make a show these days that don't fulfill a character archetype? That's quite difficult, considering the size of the TVtropes database. SOMEONE is going to say, "oh look, I've seen that character personality before".
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:49 No.36131595
         File1276253378.png-(203 KB, 218x400, 1264799058386.png)
    203 KB
    >he likes bakemonogatari
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:50 No.36131608
    You know a show sucks when it takes half a year to finish
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:50 No.36131620
    >>36131595
    >he is a faggot who thinks trying to trolling Bake threads makes him cool
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:51 No.36131660
    >>36131608
    A year now. Bakemonogatari started on July 2009.

    And the final episode is coming this month.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:52 No.36131662
    >>36131473
    moe, to me, seems to have evolved over the years. Back in 2005, I would've said that moe refers to only cute characters, in particular loli characters. Nowadays, moe refers to pretty much anything that's likeable. I'm not saying that you or I intentionally made it this way. I'm saying that community usage of this word, in particular the /a/ community, uses it more common-purposely than maybe what it was intended for. Just think about how many shows are called MOESHIT even though they may only have a faint trace of year 2005 moe.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:52 No.36131675
    >>36131620
    >He tries to tell the troll off by insulting him, but is really just feeding his ego
    >Implying
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:54 No.36131719
    >>36131608
    I don't think you need me to point out the flaw in that argument, right? Judging a show not by its content, but rather by its release dates... well, you can think for yourself, I won't argue with you about this one.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:54 No.36131728
    >>36131580
    Resident trolls consisting of gorespammer and a minority of trolls. Those who do dislike it for other reasons excluded, of course.

    >>36131588
    Fix it by killing spammer irl then. Seriously, someone should fucking do it.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:55 No.36131747
    /ɐ/ is full of insecure neckbeards who take any opinion opposing their own as an attack on their pathetic ego and faggots who think repeating the same tired old trolls makes them smart, so at this point we can't even have a legitimate thread about this show. Which is a shame because it was a decently fun show that was at least better than most of the bottom of the barrel crap that gets churned out constantly. No, it's not some kind of transcendental masterpiece, but I'd rather talk about bake than shit like K-On.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:55 No.36131757
    Like I wrote somewhere early in the thread.

    Give it like 5 years. Then we could have Bake threads. Sad but true.

    I think I'm going to spam K-ON! threads so everyone hates it.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:57 No.36131808
    >>36131747
    We can. I've responded to every single thought out post in this thread that wasn't made by me, so go ahead and speak your mind if you have an opinion. In particular though, and I think it's sad that no one has touched on this, I'd like to ask what the direction should be for future shows.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)06:59 No.36131863
    >>36131548
    Obvious troll is obvious.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:00 No.36131879
    It's sad because it's so obvious it's just one guy trying to spam his three failed threads as much as possible.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:02 No.36131921
    >>36131879
    Like I said, I don't mind spam that much. Yes, it makes the thread less readable, but not in any significant way. Also, it helps to keep the thread at the top.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:02 No.36131927
    >>36131757
    Or, you know, track spammer(s) down and dismember the fag(s).
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:03 No.36131942
    >>36131921
    >Also, it helps to keep the thread at the top.

    And? It's a shit troll thread.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:04 No.36131964
    >>36131942
    No, I'm OP, and I've actually been sitting here refreshing and responding to posts, so it's not a troll thread, but I won't argue with you, if that's what you believe.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:05 No.36131976
    >>36131964
    No, I'm OP, and I hate Bakemonogatari
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:06 No.36132002
    >>36131879
    Three?
    >>36131864
    >>36131783
    >>36131587
    >>36131943
    Four threads he made, all his typical reverse/bait threads that he made to samefag.
    >>36131082
    And this thread, where he's spamming to derail and troll.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:07 No.36132015
    fuck off
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:07 No.36132028
    >>36131942
    >>36131976
    Fuck off, spammer.

    >>36131964
    Just ignore the spammer. Just find a decent topic for dicussion.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:09 No.36132067
    Gorespammers year of shame:
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    http://pastebin.com/WSp8Lsum
    >> Vx !yVLcr8kRh6 06/11/10(Fri)07:09 No.36132082
    >>36131561
    Truth.

    And it's definitely over-rated for what it's worth (while not being shit or anything), i don't give two shits if it sells like hotcakes in Grorious Nippon. Sales != quality
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:10 No.36132103
    sage
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:12 No.36132129
    >>36132103
    Do you know what sage means, newfriend?
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:13 No.36132158
    >Bakemonogatari thread

    Sure is summer here.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:13 No.36132174
    >>36132082
    Yes, but the thing is, when I look at the aspect of sales, I'm not trying to say, "hey this show is the best! Look at how much it sold! Your shows are shit!" I'm thinking more of the fact that it's great that a good show can reach a wide audience. That's the reason why I compared it to current shows that may be considered to be good, but don't have the sufficient requirements, or so it would seem, to even be recognizable, given 6 months to a year from now. This is my opinion, of course, but would you not agree that a certain level of market penetration (that doesn't even require sacrificing the quality level of the show) is valuable?
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:14 No.36132187
    Yeah, right. gb2 Animesuki OP
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:14 No.36132189
         File1276254875.jpg-(28 KB, 306x164, bakeshit.jpg)
    28 KB
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:15 No.36132204
    >>36132082
    It's old, and people moved on. Except for gorespammer, who still troll and spam to generate hate.

    And of course sales don't equal quality. The whole reason you think so its because you see spammer implying it is. He's spamming threads like that and that retarded copypasta about success to reverse troll for a reason.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:15 No.36132216
    >>36132174
    just like Twilight
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:15 No.36132226
    >>36132189
    >>36132187
    >>36132158
    >>36132103
    >>36132015
    >>36131976
    >>36131942
    >Gorespammer
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:17 No.36132253
    Stop getting trolled, and stop feeding god damn op and his shitty copypasta.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:20 No.36132320
    >>36132174
    Also, thank you very much mod, for cleaning up this thread.

    >>36132028
    And, thank you for having the intelligence to trace through anonymous postings to figure out who is the actual OP.

    What if I bring up another topic... the illusion of fanservice. Let me explain. It would seem to me, that certain shows simply have fanservice that is not very recognizable, or how would I put it, fanservice that you probably wouldn't actively focus on, since the other elements of the show are just so much more important. For instance, Bakemonogatari does have at least a few panty shots. It also has a shower scene. But, given the entirety of the show, I find it difficult to go back to it and say, "oh, man that fanservice show from 2009 was quite interesting". Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I'm of the opinion that it's a good thing, since it should achieve the following:
    1 - provides fanservice, which stimulates interest in certain characters
    2 - does note categorize itself as a fanservice show so viewers aren't expecting more of the same

    Point 2, in particular, is important, since a show like Kiss x Sis for example, won't do without fanservice. If they aired the next episode without, I'd be left wondering why I'm still watching it.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:21 No.36132356
    >>36132216
    0/10
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:21 No.36132374
    >>36132216
    Can you elaborate? I haven't watched Twilight.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:22 No.36132394
    Fuck. When episode 15 comes out I sure hope true Bake fans actually get a good thread with some mod protection just like /g/ got with there WWDC thread.

    Oh how I can wish....
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:28 No.36132546
    I liked BMG. I'm cant pinpoint what exactly made it reach a lot of people, but the unique style had to do with it as every frame is fun to look at, so it attracts people who then like it for the other elements the show has to offer.

    Although when I see someone rating it a 10/10, my opinion of them is that they must be idiots that are impressed easily and are probably Death Note and Elfen Lied fans.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:29 No.36132561
    >>36132546
    Very well said.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:31 No.36132608
    >>36132320
    Keep it simple, why don't you. Too tired of spammer and seeing his shitty trolling for night, so maybe next time. And next time, try a more easy and less wordy opening.

    >>36132374
    It's just a troll. Ignore.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:32 No.36132621
    >>36132546
    Well, 10/10 means something different to everyone, I would imagine. For me, it's simply a reflection of how much I feel like watching the next episode. If a show carries me from start to end, and keeps me interested even though I have class in the morning the next day and it's 4:00 AM, then that's a 10/10. Objective reviews, however, probably shouldn't evaluate that way.

    As an aside, Elfen Lied was one of the first romances that I watched and I absolutely loved it. Back then, it was a 10/10 for me. In retrospect, now that I've had a lot more experience with romance shows, I still think it's pretty good (high or top tier, but not god tier -- if we use a tier analogy), but I can also see where it has flaws.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:32 No.36132623
    >>36132608
    for tonight, even.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:32 No.36132632
         File1276255945.jpg-(249 KB, 665x1800, 1273580484034.jpg)
    249 KB
    >THIS WHOLE THREAD
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:32 No.36132635
    >>36132546

    Doh, I meant "I cant" not "I'm"
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:33 No.36132650
    >>36132621
    >As an aside, Elfen Lied was one of the first romances that I watched and I absolutely loved it.

    summer
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:33 No.36132658
    >>36132632
    Fucking saved for truth.....
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:33 No.36132664
    >>36132621
    >Elfen Lied

    Oh good fucking christ.
    Do people still believe this trolling crock of shit?
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:34 No.36132675
    >>36132608
    >less wordy
    Yes, you have a good point, but I'm pretty much out of ideas so maybe another time.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:35 No.36132691
    Baketard this thread
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:38 No.36132771
    >>36132621

    I used to rate things by interest also, but the thing is, despite my hate for Elfen Lied (and the fans that are crazy) I can't deny its one hell of an interesting show that you will have a hard time stopping midway.
    But the thing is, its interesting for all the wrong reasons, and on a technical/story/writing level, the show is awful.

    I even watched it twice to see if I was missing something people were seeing and I wasn't, but I just cant get over how much I wanted to facepalm during many scenes.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:38 No.36132781
    >>36132650
    >>36132664
    I think it's actually pretty easy to fall in love with a show at first, only to realize its faults later. Believe it or not, when I started watching anime, I even liked Love Hina, but at this point, I'd only give it a mid-tier or lower rating, since it really has some of the worst aspects of harem anime.

    What I liked about Elfen Lied was the emotional involvement. The fact that I bawwed a couple of times, but was still satisfied with a semi-ambiguous / positive ending, put this show high up on my list.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:38 No.36132784
    NisiO Isin is good at identifying the mindset and wants of his target audience and playing around with that. I think there's plenty of evidence of that in his prior works (The previews for Katanagatari being a recent example, the new direction for Medaka Box, the plot twist for Death Note: Another Case, they all hinge entirely on the readers' presumptions). He knows their expectations and plays with that, delivering the pretense that he will deliver some element or another, then denying it, only to later deliver similar so that fans aren't left in utter frustration.

    Admit it, when you read his stories, you don't just read it for the stories, you read it for his unique brand of storytelling
    >> Bitches & !Whores/8sg 06/11/10(Fri)07:40 No.36132829
    >>36132771
    and its not like elfen lieds source material is any better

    dat manga volume 5 man, what the fuck
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:42 No.36132875
    >>36132784
    >He knows their expectations and plays with that, delivering the pretense that he will deliver some element or another, then denying it, only to later deliver similar so that fans aren't left in utter frustration
    I'm quoting this right here, because I've never thought about it in this way, but you may be right.

    >>36132771
    In the end, I think you were simply lacking a connection to the characters. I felt a similar way about Clannad. I already had some character biases before the anime even started, so in the end, the fact that the story focused on characters I didn't care about also made me not care about whatever happened to them (such as Nagisa dying).
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:43 No.36132897
         File1276256605.jpg-(2.65 MB, 2561x1950, 1245044737947.jpg)
    2.65 MB
    >>36132632
    Minding that, gorespammer makes Toradora spammer look like a joke. Even Toradora spammer stopped spamming and trolling three months after airing ended, and he came out making a final thread admitting he'd stop.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:43 No.36132907
    >>36132784
    Looking over his list of works, I just realized Nisio is a prolific motherfucker, he comes out with a dozen books a year and works on simultaneous projects, manga, anime adaptations. But yeah, he really does step on regular manga conventions and stereotypes, but he also mixes in character-driven development and blends genres pretty well throughout all of it.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:44 No.36132914
    Now you're just giving him more fuel.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:46 No.36132959
         File1276256782.jpg-(342 KB, 918x1300, 7715154.jpg)
    342 KB
    Best girl in the series? Y/N.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:46 No.36132964
    >>36132914
    Who cares? It's not like not giving the fag fuel has slowed or stopped spammer from making up a bait thread to collect post to edit and make troll threads out of them.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:46 No.36132966
    >>36132897

    And I guess gorespammer saw that reverse trolling instead of bashing always gets a lot more replies.

    Which confuses me now, considering he's the only one replying anymore.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:47 No.36132979
    >>36132632
    Rarely have I seen an image more adequately describe a thread. I'm actually kind of amazed to see genuine discussion of Bakemonogatari, regardless.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:47 No.36133000
    >>36132897
    >implying Taiga isn't Gorespammer
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:48 No.36133011
    >>36132907
    >>36132897
    >>36132875
    >>36132829
    >>36132784
    >>36132781
    >>36132771

    A real discussion on my /a/???????
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:48 No.36133022
    >>36132959
    I wouldn't say she's the best girl in the show, but I feel that she has a distinctively different flavor from most "class rep" types, and variety is usually good.
    >> Anonymous 06/11/10(Fri)07:48 No.36133023
    >>36132959
    Not with that inaccurately disgusting pic.

    Shinobu is the best.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous