>>
04/28/10(Wed)10:20 No. 34078187 >>34077303 >>34077348 Goddamnit
you idiots, feminism != "radical feminism" Yes, there are some
batshit insane "feminists" that are probably more appropriately called
female supremacists and have nothing to do with a coherent civil rights
movement and are a tiny, albeit vocal, minority within the feminist
movement. But there's still a problem with equality. It's been proven,
time and again, that women make less money than men in the same
positions with the same qualifications. Women aren't taking over the
fucking world, they're just taking what belongs to them and everybody.
Equal rights are still an issue. And no, "women expect to not
have to pay for a date" and other examples of "chivalry" that men are
allegedly expected to uphold, is not a fucking example of
institutionalized sexism, it is you being a goddamn idiot and a doormat,
confusing faux pas with violations of civil rights. If you don't want
to do all that shit, then don't date the type of haughty cunt that
expects you to. Gender roles are a lot more subjective and malleable
than not being able to find a fucking job or getting significantly less
for it because of something out of your control, like your sex. And
for the record, I'd rather go Dutch on a date, so there's no awkward
tension where you feel like you owe someone anything.