>> |
04/12/10(Mon)18:18 No.33367373I'm
going to remake that gif now. Thing is, I made it in Flash on another
computer, so I don't want to change things until I know my explanation
is right.
So here's the million dollar question. There are two
possible explanations here.
1) Yuki did not change the past, just
the present (and therefore the future), and everyone's memories. This
makes Mikuru's past actions a paradox since the future she came from did
not exist.
2)Yuki actually changed the past, but Tanabata was
not changed. Mikuru and Kyon were frozen in time up until the change, at
which point they weren't, because they didn't need to be, because they
had never gone back in time in the first place at that point. The thing
is, this theory relies on the fact that there were two futures happening
at the same time in the same universe.
So, what'll it be? Easy
to understand but causes a paradox, or impossible to understand but
doesn't cause a paradox. |