Pretty accurate for japanese, not so for typical /a/non. What is this buy they speak of?

Like that anyone can type anything they want on the Internets. Where are you getting at OP?

>buy

what?

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

we are only 2 notches above furries

>>29259807

I've never bought anything in my life.

>gizmodo

/g/ was here, their opinion is null and void

A cool-kid website using blanket statements and misconceptions to stereotype otaku subculture?

Feels blasé, man. Like this doesn't happen at least once a month...

Oh look, it's the shitcomplex of tech news!

>They replace normal social interactions with hours spent posting about a world that doesn't actually exist on a certain imageboard.

fix'd

>>29259850
>Pretty accurate for japanese

Keep thinking that.

why so defensive, anon?

>sports geeks
>car geeks
I don't think that's how it works

Well, making the equivalent of a blog post about different stereotypes of geeks and rehashing old jokes in order to beat a few dead horses is super respectable, right?

Why are we below cosplayers?

>>29259918
>>29259905
these

>>29259977

inb4 rage.jpg

I think the author doesn't really know what he's talking about. The word he'd be looking for is weeaboo, the term otaku hardly even applies in correct context to anime viewers outside of Japan. Were it not for the first 'attribute', his description would apply more strongly to japanese otaku.

>First comment: "Furries should be lower on the list."

Feels good man.

>>29259941
>implying that the OP statement isn't a textbook definition of the Japanese otaku

>Knowing how to cook
>This elevates hunger to a seriously geeky level, one that often makes people insufferable pricks to eat around.
This list, on a whole, is dildos.

>>29259977
Because Several cosplayers have been alleged to be attractive. There are no pretty Otaku.

>>29259918
>Of course, if the obsession is more with the vroom vroom noises than the mechanics of the engine, you lose out on the major upside of being a geek: brains.
Oh man, I sure would like to see how /o/ react to this.

So where on the list is "writing article for failing technology website"

>>29260048
we have some decent traps, so I think we're set

>collecting all sorts of figurines of either huge-breasted fantasy girls
>huge breasted

Fuck them. DFC forever

>>29260028
It's not. You've apparently never read a textbook either. They usually like to keep things objective.

Kill yourself or learn to read. Your choice.

Gizmodo is such a horrible macfag site.

Their style for writing makes me want to puke.

Good thing i don't fallow retarded twitter/myspace/bloggs shit like that.

Now OP why would you bother showing us that?

>>29260123

OH GOSH THEY SAYIN BAD THINGS OF US IN THEIR BLOGG!
IMMA MAKE A TWEET!

That's only if you flaunt/don't suppress your power level.

The rest of us can probably pass for something higher up the acceptability scale.

>>29260290
I'd pass as a completely normal uninteresting guy, a real average joe with nothing special whose name you wouldn't remember while suppressing my level down to 0 outside and hating myself every fucking second.

But hey, you gotta have a job the internet won't pay itself alone.

imokwiththis.jpg

i have nothing of this
all the manga i read its from the internet
i dont watch anime
and social interactions are just fine, nothing special

just a regular guy that enjoys reading, books , comics or manga (same thing but you read rigth-left)

>>29260378
Don't worry you are also 13 no one would judge, for now.

>>29260429
nah im 17