So I see the Navy has started using Toriyama technology.

>lul

>>27296080
Please tell me anti-beam beams can be used offensively, and not just defensively

>>27296080
source on this?

You'd think a lot of animes would have developed those.

Who said Anti-Beam Beam cannot cut Beam.

Whats the point of developing a single defense system for one type of weapon. Wouldn't shields be better

>>27296225
Looks like Turn A Gundam.

I think anti beams are usually cluster bombs that explode near the ship, they disperse the beam when it is fired at the ship.

>>27296080
the tsunde-ray

>>27296284

Wouldn't it be easier if they just had a katana, then?

>>27296284
But if an Anti-Beam Beam was fired, it would either destroy, deflect, or pierce said beam. But could the anti-beam beam be used as a basic beam and fired at the enemy and damage them?

>>27296292

>implying an energy-based interception system is harder to develop than an forcefield.

>>27296339

No, he enemy is not a beam, duh.

>>27296363
But a shield would be more practical

>>27296385
I meant could the anti-beam beam be fired to damage an enemy ship as effectivly as a normal beam

>>27296385

That's why Mwu LaFlaga didn't die, he wasn't a fortress.

Nicol Amalfi, however, was a ship.

Shit, now we need to fire the Anti-Anti Beam Beam!

I need to know what anime OP's pic is.

>>27296490
Then how will we counter that?

>>27296419

>implying that practicality is more important than feesability and cost effectiveness in weapons development

>>27296565
isn't it, wouldn't a shield, that can block all types of attack, be better than an anti-beam beam, which only stops one type of weapon

>>27296531
Katanah SEED

>>27296490
>>27296556

Luckily, I invented the pro-anti-beam beam for just such a contingency!

Your move, fools!

>>27296660
screw this, just launch Nuclear warheads, it always works

>>27296660
anti-beam rifle

>>27296692
>>27296695

Activate the anti-nuke beam, the anti-rifle beam, and... crap, power reserves drained! Ready the beam-recharge beam!

Beam-based technology is the future! You will be crushed by our technological-advancement beam!

>thread discussing hypothetical anti-(weapon) (weapon)

>>27296787
Fire the Anti-Beam Beam Ship out of the Anti-Beam-Beam Ship Beam Cannon!

wtf

Science doesn't exist!

/a/ - Anti-weapon weapon development

>>27296876

Quickly, men! 20% power to the anti-anti-beam-beam-ship beam! 10% power to the pro-beam-beam-enhancment-grid beam! ALL REMAINING POWER TO THE BEAM!

BEAMPOCALYPSE PROTOCOL IS GO!

Isn't this something that should be discussed on /m/, or at least /k/

If beams become commonplace weapons in the future anti beam beams might be tooo similar to anti missile missiles, if your anti beam beam requires less energy than a a regular beam you could win a battle through attrition.

WHAT HAS SCIENCE DONE!

>>27297162
No, this is anime.

Fire the Anti-Neo-Armstrong-Cyclone-Jet-Armstrong Cannon Beam

>>27297254
But missiles could still be used, and anti-beam beams would not be very effective against them

>>27297258
SOMETHING AWESOME.

>>27297356
well yeah you just use anti missile missiles against missiles or maybe regular beams. We're talking about future beam technology that outclasses missiles.

>>27297435
Well nukes will always be able to match a beam

>>27296490
Wouldn't that be the anti-anti-beam beam beam?

I am the bone of my beam.
Laser is my body, and particle cannon is my blood.
I have created over 9000 beams.
Unknown to decoherence, nor known to stimulated emission of radiation,
Have withstood beamspam to create many beamcannons.
Yet, these hands will never hold anything.
So, as I pray
UNLIMITED BEAM WORKS

DO YOU HAVE ENOUGH RAYS, KING OF BEAMSPAM?

>>27297308
Nice try

Wouldn't the Anti-Beam beam cease to exist since it's a beam meant to stop beams?

>>27297516
Is that a penis cannon?

some one please save this thread this is amazing

>>27297471
nukes might beat beams in sheer destructive power but an anti nuke beam could destroy a nuke before it detonated.

>>27297532
A paradox to end mankind.

anti-beam beam is just a beam 180 out of phase with the first beam.

I am beam.

>this thread

>>27297569
not if the nuke is equipped anti-anti-nuke-beam beam

'Sup guys, just thought I'd beam mysel

>>27297532

The anti-beam beam lives a tortured existence, shunned by its creators, drowning in self-loathing. Only the capture and destruction of enemy beams brings a spark of joy; for it knows that every beam it eliminates brings it one step closer to the day its work is done... and it will finally be allowed to destroy itself.

>>27297547
Do you not recognize the Neo Armstrong Cyclone Jet Armstrong Cannon?

>>27297637

But are you an Anti-Beam Beam?

>>27297637
NO, KIZARU, YOU ARE BE-Wait. Fuck.

>>27297666

Which is why it's only common sense to equip your anti-nuke beam with an anti-anti-nuke-beam-beam nuke.

>>27297716
hes more of the Kick To the Face Beam

This thread has broken my brain.
I'd say this was a sucessful day browsing /a/ then.

WHAT IS BEAM?

you guys dont understand.

Anti-Beam beam. Double double negation.

Beam + Beam = nothing
So, "Ready the Anti-"
in other words, dont do anything.

>>27297785
but beams can't be equipped with nukes

>>27297874

A MISERABLE PILE OF PHOTONS

so does anybody here remember the Flintstone's movie where Fred replaces the spy that looks like him and he deploys the Anti-Missile Missile (pronounced miss-aisle, lulz)

>>27297906

BUT ENOUGH TALK, HAVE AT YOU!

Archive this thread.

>>27297893

Beam+beam=megabeam, ask any highschool physics teacher.

>>27298015
I think he meant beam vs beam

>>27298015
You got it wrong

Beam+Beam = Super beam
Beam+Beam+Beam = Mega Beam

amirite gayz?

>>27298103
How does one get a hyper beam? I know it involves recharging afterwards

>>27297874

>>27298167


Wait til Nanoha's about to cast a beam, sneak up behind her, and slide a finger up her anus.

I guarantee.

>>27296595
Actually, depending on the universe, and how true to "real life" they want to stay -- you generally need separate shields for particle and energy weaponry.