26 June 2010

A sends:

To: <jya[at]pipeline.com>
CC: <info[at]mirror-world.ru>
Subject: The Tempest in the Tea Pot
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:53:35 -0500

I haven't had so much fun since poor Chris Bolleyn ran out of Prozac and escaped his keepers to join up with the redoubtable "Sorcha Faal" in Latvia! Will these devastating revelations never cease? Not on our part, they won't. Disinformation ought to be a little more subtle and believable. On the other hand, the drooling idiots that have set up shop at Langley  don't have the brains God gave a garden slug so what can we expect?  

The Fadley Follies

June 26, 2010

by Robert Fadley

The Wikileaks Dustup: The Good Humour Column [Previously published elsewhere]

            There has been a good deal of self-generated comment of late concerning one  Julian Assange and his website, Wikileaks. The basic thrust of this tempest in a teapot is that the daring and courageous Mr. Assanage, an Australian connected with the expatriate American Jimmy Wales and his Wikipedia, has published some fuzzy pictures purporting to show American military personnel gleefully shooting down unwanted journalists. For this, Mr. Assange has garnered a good deal of publicity, mostly from the sensationalist bloggers and their allies in the conspiracy world. There has been breathless talk about secret Swedish internet sites, Icelandic “free zones,” nameless but sinister persecutions of the heroic revealer of the terrible truth and, on a lesser scale, many requests for financial assistance. Now, apparently, this assistance has not been forthcoming so the public is urgently informed that Mr. Assange is a marked man.

            Unfortunately for this scenario, the U.S. Army conducted an investigation into the charge that Wikileaks posted secret documents first

            The investigation file is named “ Wikileaks/Suspected Leakage of Classified Information” and was assigned case number 08FEB0824D400075EC and a study of the document, which is in the public  domain, indicates that that a member of the NETWARCOM Security informed NCIS that Wikileaks was hosting classified material. A report was taken by a Reporting Agent (RA) who then contacted a Special Agent involved with FCI (Foreign Counterintelligence Investigations.) The FCI agent informed him the US Army Criminal Investigation Division had been contacted and was conducting their own investigation into the matter.

             It was very quickly determined that “No Further Reporting [was] Anticipated.” The case was closed the same day with no additional investigations having been conducted by any Federal agency from that date.

            Why, one asks, would this be so quickly disposed of in light of the allegations of terrible revelations? Quite obviously because competent authority very quickly determined that Mr. Assange has not posted secret material. In point of fact, a close review of the previous web contents of the sporadic Wikileaks quickly discloses that the alleged “secret” material posted is either not secret or pure invention.

            Those interested in such matters will remember the rise and fall of Messers Tom Floccco, Wayne Madsen,“Sorcha Faal” and the redoubtable Christopher Bolleyn, who fled the country after assaulting a Chicago policeman when  Bolleyn claimed both the Mafia and the FBI were standing on ladders, peering into his kitchen window and driving up and down in front of his house in cars bristling with automatic weapons. 

            What is needed here is not action but Prozac and perhaps, if Australia gives the redoubtable and courageous Assange his passport back, he can join Bolleyn in Estonia where the latter is working on a chicken farm. God alone knows what stupendous revelations might emerge from such a monumental union but God has a peculiar sense of humor.

Wikileaks founder exposes 'Super Injunction!!'

June 26, 2010

WikiLeaks

              Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange has revealed that the UK practices (sic) a new form of censorship, the superinjunction. An injunction is where a judge imposes a news blackout on certain information before the court. In a superinjunction the judge also bars the media from telling the public that a blackout is in effect. In other words, the media is required to censor itself and not allowed to say it is doing so.

            It is only one step from the superinjunction, which deals with specific evidence, to a general ban on telling the public that a trial is taking place at all. Thus the superinjunction represents an important step in the western world's march towards complete Stalinism as represented by the secret trial.

            Canada has long been in the vanguard of new methods of censorship. The existence of superinjunctions in Canada would explain a lot. Is there a Canadian politician who would ask a question on this topic in Parliament?