![]()
|
||
4 June 2010 Wikileaks Insider Messages: http://cryptome.org/0001/wikileaks-mess.htm
"More clear fabrications about us (Julian hasn't even been to South Africa). Where is it coming from? http://bit.ly/9heCln 3:38 AM Jun 3rd via bit.ly" This was posted on WIKILEAKS in response to my WIKILEAKS funding piece published by CRYPTOME. Your friend Julian needs to step up to the plate and answer some of the issues presented, rather than hide behind his usual smoke screen of "they're out to get me" hyperbola. Particularly the point concerning published accounts and expenditures and particularly those headed for South Africa.. WIKILEAKS Insider
Cryptome supports those unknowns who provided Wikileaks with hard to get information. In support of the unknowns Cryptome offers their contributions from January 2007 to April 2010 currently unavailable at Wikileaks. Zipped in a file about 2GB in size, these include most of the controversial files published during the period. For the collection on a DVD email a shipping address to cryptome[at]earthlink.net with the subject "Wikileaks-2007-2010." Send a donation to Wikileaks or other dozens of FOI websites in support of the unknowns. Best for the public and most trustworthy is to run your own outlet -- it can be done for $20 a month. Thousands of outlets terrify the authoritatives of information flow who much prefer a few easily bribed with glory and regular pay.
19 May 2010 Wikileaks website reopens: http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Wikileaks 18 May 2010 PGPBoard sends: Further to an anonymous comment posted on CRYPTOME concerning WIKILEAKS Funding Drive. PGPBOARD is not the source of the comments. We merely forward encrypted messages from our email drop boxes, or web page, to a specified destination.
17 May 2010. A sends: From: George Orwell <nobody[at]mixmaster.it> Why do you attack Mr. Assange from Wikileaks? All of this is US government backed. Are you jealous of Wikileaks? They would never sell information to the highest bidder. Who writes this? 16 May 2010 Related: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/pgpboard/ Previous: wikileaks-dream.htm Wikileaks-Snake Oil or Just a Hackers Wet Dream? April 19, 2010
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 13:09:14 +0100 From: Walshingham2000 <pgpboard[at]gmail.com> To: cryptome[at]earthlink.net Subject: FORWARDED MESSAGE PGPBOARD (160510 1306 GMT) WIKILEAKS FUNDING DRIVE ----------------------------------------------- Julian Assange's very public fund raising campaign has effectively stalled with past and potential investors fading into the background. As previously indicated it is NOT the philosophy of WIKILEAKS that is in question, but Assange's credibility. The lack of any significant high rollers backing Assange has led to a significant change of direction concerning fund raising. These are paid interviews and appearances, and appeals to the internet community to send money. Keeping in mind that Assange has publicly stated that he needs $200,000 USD just to keep the lights on, and $600,000 USD to be fully funded; then just how much has Assange received, how much has been spent, and on what? A pressing point when one considered WIKILEAKS is still effectively closed down, and Assange continues to enjoy a particularly luxurious lifestyle in South Africa with no comparable income streams. From information received, since January 2010 WIKILEAKS income until end of April 2010 has been: Internet Donations: $132,347 USD Media Interviews etc. $82,892 USD Sponsorships: $28,657 USD The total income YTD is $243,896 USD. Then why aren't the lights on at WIKILEAKS Mr. Assange?? When will you provide audited accounts of WIKILEAKS operating expenditure?? Finally, just keep in mind that Assange has not abandoned the concept of selling information by auction to media groups on an exclusive basis. Now just where does that fit into WIKILEAKS philosophy? To put it brutally, it does not, it's a scheme designed exclusively to fill Assange offshore bank accounts.. Regards A WIKILEAKS Insider
|