11 August 2009
[Federal Register: August 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 153)]
[Notices]
[Page 40189-40199]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11au09-82]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
The National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB), a Federal Advisory
Committee to the Secretary; Request for Public Comment
AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the
Secretary.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is hereby
giving notice that the National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) Medical
Countermeasure Markets and Sustainability Working Group is requesting
public comment to their working document, ``Inventory of Issues
Constraining or Enabling Industry Involvement in Medical Countermeasure
Efforts''. The inventory (or grid) includes factors that may discourage
industry involvement or partnering with the U.S. Government in medical
countermeasure development efforts, reported constraints to industry
involvement, and potential solutions for relief from a particular
constraint. The inventory has been catalogued by financial,
legislative, scientific, human capital, regulatory, and societal
elements. The Working Group wishes to solicit comment, feedback, and
guidance from members of industry, other government agencies, and the
public at large for consideration by the Working Group to strengthen
and refine the document prior to its public presentation to the NBSB at
the scheduled Fall 2009 public meeting of the Board.
DATES: The public is asked to submit comments by October 30, 2009, to
the NBSB e-mail box (NBSB@hhs.gov) in order to be considered by the
Working Group in preparing the final document.
[[Page 40190]]
ADDRESSES:
Availability of Materials: Requests for a copy of the Inventory and
accompanying ``Comment Revision Form'' should be made to the NBSB's e-
mail box at NBSB@hhs.gov with ``M&S-WG Inventory Request'' in the
subject line. All comments and/or recommendations for improvement to
the Inventory should be made on the ``Comment Revision Form'' enclosed
with the inventory document.
Procedures for Providing Public Input: Interested members of the
public may submit written comments and/or suggestions, using the
``Comment Revision Form,'' to the NBSB's e-mail box at NBSB@hhs.gov,
with ``M&S-WG Inventory Comments'' in the subject line and should be
received no later than October 30, 2009. Individuals providing comment
or suggestions will be asked to provide their name, title, and
organization. All comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.hhs.gov/aspr/omsph/nbsb/, including any personal or
commercial information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Donald Malinowski, M.Sc., HHS/ASPR/
NBSB, 330 C St., SW., 5118, Washington, DC 20201, 202-205-
4761, donald.malinowski@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 319M of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-7f) and section 222 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 217a), the Department of Health and Human
Services established the National Biodefense Science Board. The Board
shall provide expert advice and guidance to the Secretary on
scientific, technical, and other matters of special interest to the
Department of Health and Human Services regarding current and future
chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological agents, whether
naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate. The Board may also
provide advice and guidance to the Secretary on other matters related
to public health emergency preparedness and response.
Dated: July 29, 2009.
Nicole Lurie,
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Rear Admiral, U.S.
Public Health Service.
National Biodefense Science Board
Markets & Sustainability Working Group Working Document
``Inventory of Issues Constraining or Enabling Industrial Involvement
With Medical Countermeasure Development''
Request for Public Comment Published in Federal Register June 1,
2009.
Inventory of Issues Constraining or Enabling Industrial Involvement
with Medical Countermeasure Development
Introduction: The National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) Medical
Countermeasure Markets and Sustainability Working Group (M&S-WG) has
posted a request for public comment in the Federal Register to solicit
comment, feedback, and guidance from members of industry, other
government agencies, and the public at large on their working document,
``Inventory of Issues Constraining or Enabling Industry Involvement in
Medical Countermeasure Efforts.'' Posting of the working document in
the Federal Register will serve to solicit and obtain public comment
for consideration by the Working Group to strengthen and refine the
document. The Working Group plans to present the document to the NBSB
at the scheduled Fall 2009 public meeting of the Board.
Background: There exists a variety of limitations and barriers to
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies'' involvement in the
biosecurity and biodefense efforts of the U.S. Government (USG), most
notably medical countermeasure advanced research and development
programs coordinated by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Make-up of the medical
countermeasure development efforts has been called fragmented, with
confusing approaches used. To delineate and simplify the complexities
of USG endeavors in medical countermeasure development, and the
interactions between government agencies and private industry, the NBSB
Markets & Sustainability Working Group (M&S-WG) assembled the enclosed
inventory (or grid) of issues. This inventory includes factors that may
discourage industry involvement or partnering with the USG in medical
countermeasure development efforts, reported constraints to industry
involvement, and potential solutions for relief from a particular
constraint. The inventory has been catalogued by financial,
legislative, scientific, human capital, regulatory, and societal
elements.
The public is encouraged to consider submitting comments and/or
recommendations on the content of this inventory. Requests for a copy
of the inventory and accompanying Comment Revision Form should be sent
to the NBSB's e-mail box at NBSB@hhs.gov with ``M&S-WG Inventory
Request'' in the subject line. All comments and/or recommendations for
improvement to the inventory grid should be made on the Comment
Revision Form enclosed with the inventory document. Comments and/or
recommendations are to be submitted to the NBSB's e-mail box at
NBSB@hhs.gov with ``M&S-WG Inventory Comments'' in the subject line and
should be received no later than October 30, 2009.
NBSB Markets & Sustainability Work Group 18 May 09
Observations, Adapted From June 08 NBSB Meeting
Business Planning:
[mshbox] Contracting with some portions of the USG can be slow,
unwieldy, expensive, and opaque.
[mshbox] Lack of clarity increases industry risk.
[mshbox] Procurement size, warm-base requirements, length of
review, etc.
[mshbox] Lack of transparency increases industry risk.
[mshbox] Contract review process, rate of issuance of new
proposals, requirement generation.
[mshbox] With a contract in place, situation improves.
[mshbox] HHS viewed as cooperative, helpful, responsible and
responsive.
[mshbox] Perceived lack of coordination between development
activities and regulatory responsibilities remains a concern to
industry.
Regulatory:
[mshbox] Lack of clarity regarding usable product definitions,
seeming differences in FDA approaches to providing guidance to
industry.
[mshbox] Industry reliance upon USG for key components of licensure
submissions can lead to lack of accountability.
[mshbox] Disease studies, toxicology reports, etc.
Funding, Stability, Reliability, Predictability:
[mshbox] Advanced Development needs more dedicated funding,
separate from BioShield funding.
[mshbox] BioShield remains a funded procurement device, not an
advanced-development mechanism.
[[Page 40191]]
[mshbox] Advanced development efforts would benefit from
contracting flexibility.
[mshbox] Cost-plus-fee contracting flexibility is appropriate for
advanced development and would reduce risk.
[mshbox] Multiyear funding.
[mshbox] Drug development and corporate investment/planning is
long-term process, multiyear funding with carry-over authority, with
multi-year contracting authority would signal USG commitment and
increase industry sense of long-term stability.
[mshbox] Project BioShield expires in 2013 and will need to be
reauthorized and funded.
[mshbox] Five years not a long time in drug-development process.
[mshbox] BioShield funds should not be diverted to fund other
initiatives.
[mshbox] Inadequate funding delays the journey to MCM licensure.
[mshbox] Initiate additional program against emerging diseases,
modeled after pandemic program.
Next Steps for WG :
[mshbox] Continue to identify obstacles to greater industry
participation in MCM development.
[mshbox] Make recommendations where appropriate.
[mshbox] Identify incentives to encourage greater industry
participation in MCM development.
[mshbox] Make recommendations where appropriate.
[mshbox] Consider alternative models for MCM development.
[mshbox] Do other models ensure national and public-health security
while more efficiently using limited resources?
Barriers Hindering Partnership: Opportunity cost (distractions from
commercial business), economics (e.g. margins, volumes), product
liability, uncertainty over sustained funding, ambiguous governance,
competing public-health alternatives (e.g., needs of developing world),
finite human capital, complexity of working with USG, obligations
during crisis.
Incentives Encouraging Partnership: Reliable access to excess
capacity (e.g., for redundant capacity or developing-world projects),
tax credits, patent-term extensions, grants, priority-review vouchers,
preferred customer/vendor status with USG, product licensing rights,
larger pool of scientists and engineers, public good, long-term
contracts, intellectual-property development.
Inventory of Issues Constraining or Enabling Industrial Involvement With Medical Countermeasure Development 18
May 09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approach/ advantages/
Row Problem/category Potential solution action Problem/limitation
Column 1..... Column 2..... Column 3..... Column 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Elements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................ Row 1; Column 1....... Row 1; Column 2....... Row 1; Column 3....... Row 1; Column 4.
Capital requirements Increase financial Increased federal Risk of distraction
to establish safety, return after risking funding for advanced of large industry
efficacy, validated capital to industry- development, in the partners from
manufacture. standard rates. form of cost- commercial mission
Reduce requirement for reimbursement or dilution of
private capital for contracts and effort [potential
advanced development. rewarding private- conflict with
capital investments fiduciary
with milestone responsibility to
payments and at shareholders of
procurement. publicly traded
companies].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2................ Row 2; Column 1....... Row 2; Column 2a...... Row 2; Column 3a...... Row 2; Column 4.
Risk of technical Decentralized Reimbursement of Lack of interest,
failure of vaccine discovery/centralized development costs at given opportunity
development effort. development and cost +15%, with costs Congressional
manufacture. return-on-working- tolerance for
capital at 22%, and anticipatable
cost-of-money-for- frustrations is
capital at 15%. unknown.
Row 2; Column 2b...... Row 2; Column 3b......
Evaluation of whether Provides support early
indirect-cost in process.
reimbursement greater
than 100% may be
appropriate.
Assistance with
calculating indirect
cost rates (for
companies that have
never done so
before)..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3................ Row 3; Column 1....... Row 3; Column 2a...... Row 3; Column 3a......
Tax incentives........ Enhance current Currently, 20% for
incremental R&D tax qualified R&D
credit (increase, expenses and 50% for
make refundable). clinical-trial
expenses.
Row 3; Column 2b...... Row 3; Column 3b...... Row 3; Column 4.
New investment tax Enhance net revenue... Not yet authorized.
credit (20%) for
construction of new
R&D and manufacturing
facilities for
biosecurity and
emerging-infectious
disease purposes
(with refundable and/
or transferable
provisions).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4................ Row 4; Column 1....... Row 4; Column 2....... Row 4; Column 3....... Row 4; Column 4.
[[Page 40192]]
Revenue enhancements Enhance current Current statutory Note: Orphan drug tax
based on Intellectual product or use patent- formula: Patent credit applies to
Property. term restoration and/ extension vaccines only if
or extension (revise supplemented by [\1/ less than 200,000
formula). 2\ time from IND to vaccinated
Allow full patent-term filing BLA + full recipients
extension for time from BLA filing anticipated.
licensed products to FDA approval/
that gain CBRN or licensure].
emerging disease Currently, 5 years of
application (akin to market exclusivity is
adding pediatric provided to New
indication). Chemical Entities
Allow transfer of (NCEs) but not
patent-term extension biologicals via Hatch-
to another product or Waxman Act and 7
company years of market
(``wildcard''). exclusivity is
Market exclusivity: provided via Orphan
Increase term of Drug Act.
market exclusivity to
~ 12-15 years and
extend it to
biologicals (as does
Orphan Drug Act).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5................ Row 5; Column 1....... Row 5; Column 2....... Row 5; Column 3....... Row 5; Column 4.
Priority-Review Make applicable to A PRV is a tradable Predictability: Would
Vouchers (PRV). biosecurity products. certificate awarded a priority-review
to a developer of a voucher simply
treatment for a accelerate a ``no''
neglected tropical or ``not yet''
disease that gains response?
licensure from FDA. 2007 law: Text at:
It entitles holder to http://www.bvgh.org/
a priority review (a documents/HR3580-
speedier review time) CompromiseFDA-
for a future product PDUFABill.pdf Draft
of their choosing, FDA guidance: http://
potentially www.fda.gov/cber/
shortening the review gdlns/
process by 6 to 12 tropicaldisease.htm.
months.
First PRV awarded to
Novartis for Coartem
malaria treatment
(artemether and
lumefantrine) in Apr
09.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6................ Row 6; Column 1....... Row 6; Column 2a...... Row 6; Column 3a...... Row 6; Column 4a.
Limited market size Acquisition RFPs Publication of Requirements are not
(development costs >> should state minimum requirements along static and can be
market potential). quantities (total and with advanced- expected to change
to each successful development RFPs. It based on threat
awardee) to increase may be possible to assessments and
market certainty to more widely describe discoveries during
potential bidders and procurement product development.
their investors. requirements, in Requirements may
contrast to the more signal USG threat
sensitive value of recognition, so may
treatment not be appropriate
requirements. for public release.
Row 6; Column 2b...... Row 6; Column 3b...... Row 6; Column 4b.
Contract terms Treaty allies Allies have not made
allowing represent additional substantial
manufacturers access markets. independent
to allied foreign purchases to date.
governments and other Some may hope/expect
authorized customers USG to share
outside the US, as stockpile when
well as civilian attack occurs.
first responders,
hospitals, and travel-
vaccine providers
within the US.
Row 6; Column 2c...... Row 6; Column 4c.
Add biodefense and Currently only drugs,
other adult vaccines antidotes, and
to Standardized various treatments
Equipment List (SEL) are covered, but not
and Authorized vaccines for
Equipment List (AEL), prophylaxis in the
so state and local first place.
first-responders can
use federal (DHS)
grant funds to pay
for vaccinations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7................ Row 7; Column 1....... Row 7; Column 2....... Row 7; Column 3....... Row 7; Column 4.
[[Page 40193]]
Surge issues.......... Compensation if Define Potential
commercial product(s) ``compensation'' in compensation may
displaced during initial contract or need to include
emergencies (e.g., agree to a dispute- delay of a new
lost sales, market resolution mechanism. product or loss of
share, delayed market share to a
licensing). competitor. Level
difficult to
determine a priori.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legislative Elements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8................ Row 8; Column 1....... Row 8; Column 2a...... Row 8; Column 3a...... Row 8; Column 4a.
Predictability, Increase annual NIAID Multi-year contracting Limited track record.
consistency adequacy appropriation authority (for large Partial analogies:
of Congressional increases for early- molecules, due to Aerospace industry in
appropriations. stage MCM development complex manufacturing early 1940s.
to offset flat and limited use) and Consistent
funding since 2001 multi-year funding procurement of
anthrax attacks. with carry-over aircraft carriers
Insufficient funds authority for R&D and since 1940s.
now allocated for procurement
advanced development initiatives.
for CBRN.
Increase BARDA Manage funding as a Congressional long-
appropriations for ``national term recognition of
advanced development portfolio'' that threat (natural and
of CBRN MCMs and mitigates risk by a malicious) and
continued long-term broad set of target tolerance for MCM
funding for both CBRN products, with technical failure
and pandemic multiple MCMs per unknown.
countermeasues, to disease.
offset recent funding Base metrics on
shortfalls. portfolio
performance, rather
than individual
candidate
countermeasures.
Long-term funding and
ongoing government
procurement (10 years
or longer) is
essential to maintain
warm-base MCM
manufacturing and
surge capacity.
Row 8; Column 2b...... Row 8; Column 3b......
Need significantly Solution: a blend of
expanded federal indefinite mandatory
funding under funding authority
BioShield for with caveats to
advanced development assure good-faith
and procurement performance and
activities (BioShield sufficient ongoing
reauthorization and discretionary
funding). appropriations.
Stop and reverse
Congressional
diversion of
BioShield Reserve
Fund for other
initiatives ($412M in
FY09 = $137M for
pandemic + $275M for
PAHPA
implementation),
Need long-term funding
for acquisition of
FDA-approved/licensed
MCMs for Strategic
National Stockpile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9................ Row 9; Column 1....... Row 9; Column 3....... Row 9; Column 3....... Row 9; Column 4.
Funding stream........ Provide for greater PAHPA (2006) Would likely require
flexibility in authorized $1B to BARDA to use Other
milestone-driven BARDA for advanced Transaction
payment schedules development of MCMs, Authority (OTA) (not
under PAHPA and in addition to used to date).
BioShield, to account BioShield Reserve
for the Fund.
unpredictability of Avoids rPA102 scenario
vaccine R&D technical (risk of repayment
difficulties and upon cancellation).
progress.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10............... Row 10; Column 1...... Row 10; Column 2...... Row 10; Column 3......
[[Page 40194]]
Untrodden development Cooperative R&D Enhanced recognition
pathways. Agreements (CRADAs) that changes in
allow collaboration product requirements
with respect for can be expected to
intellectual property. increase the cost and
US Gov't and sponsor time required to
agree on defined achieve a useable
development pathway product.
at early stages to Requires enhanced
achieve a target integration of
product profile. efforts by each USG
entity (notably
BARDA, NIAID, CDC,
FDA, DoD, InterAgency
Board).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11............... Row 11; Column 1...... Row 11; Column 2...... Row 11; Column 3...... Row 11; Column 4.
Facilitating Streamline process to Offer innovator an Milestone payments
technology transfer support integration option of (a) a could be used on a
from basic to of disciplines needed milestone payment multiple of private
advanced development. for successful scale- (``prize'') as a paid-in capital
up of manufacturing single fee to license (variable) or a
processes. the intellectual fixed amount per
Increase U.S. Gov't property for further drug.
funding for applied development or (b)
bioscience, material continue involvement
sciences and in development in
biopharmaceutical exchange for the
processes. possibility of
royalties after FDA
licensure achieved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Human Capital Elements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12............... Row 12; Column 1...... Row 12; Column 2...... Row 12; Column 3...... Row 12; Column 4
Human capital within Grow the pool of Increased range of Additional
industry. science and scientific programs flexibility needed
engineering talent offers additional in USG agency
pool within industry career-development authority to provide
needed to develop and for industrial competitive
manufacture MCMs scientists and compensation to
within the US. engineers. critical employees.
DARPA model assumes
industry-standard
compensation rates.
Congress authorized
large increases for
NIH grants for
researcher awards,
but a long-term
approach is needed to
sustain the
industrial base..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13............... Row 13; Column 1...... Row 13; Column 2a..... Row 13; Column 3a.....
Complex, evolving Clarify expectations Spill-over benefits to
regulatory early in product commercial sphere via
requirements. development and enhanced dialog with
minimize changes in FDA.
expectations in
application review
(e.g., requirements
under ``animal
rule'').
Row 13; Column 2b..... Row 13; Column 3b..... Row 13; Column 4b.
Implement best Partner with Companies with
practices for quality/ experienced biopharma extensive FDA
regulatory systems organization to gain experience not
for biosecurity access to either currently engaged
products. staff or quality with MCM development
systems. or manufacture.
Row 13; Column 2c..... Row 13; Column 3c.....
Collaboration with FDA Centralized advanced
to meet evolving development and
(more stringent) manufacturing to
standards for facilitate cross-
development, product learning and
manufacture, clinical system development.
trials, and ``animal-
rule'' pathways.
Row 13; Column 2d.....
Accelerated FDA review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14............... Row 14; Column 1...... Row 14; Column 2...... Row 14; Column 3...... Row 14; Column 4
Administrative Contracting reform to Waive nonessential Familiarity with
requirements to relieve the accounting Federal Acquisition
comply with USG regulatory and requirements and Regulations (FAR)
contracts. reporting burden. other components of (or relief from
the Federal them).
Acquisition
Regulation (FAR).
[[Page 40195]]
BARDA should identify
opportunities to use
Other Transaction
Authority (OTA) to
enhance R&D contracts
(akin to DARPA)..
Explore Cooperative
R&D Agreement (CRADA)
approaches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15............... Row 15; Column 1...... Row 15; Column 2...... Row 15; Column 3......
Adequacy of review and Increase More medical reviewers
consultation appropriations to needed, plus research
resources at FDA. enhance FDA review and assay development
and consultation. within FDA.
Increase percentage of
personnel eligible
for enhanced bonus
payments or super-
grades.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Societal Elements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16............... Row 16; Column 1...... Row 16; Column 2...... Row 16; Column 3...... Row 16; Column 4
Contribution to Exploration of Enhanced corporate Increased public
national security.. biosecurity MCMs is reputation.. attention during
likely to have spill- crisis.
over benefits to
``natural''
infectious diseases
as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal Elements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17............... Row 17; Column 1...... Row 17; Column 2...... Row 17; Column 3...... Row 17; Column 4.
Product liability..... Expand coverage of Indemnification via Not tested in
PREP Act to Public Readiness & practice or
additional MCMs for Emergency litigated. http://
which Material Threat Preparedness (PREP) www.pandemicflu.gov/
Assessments (MTAs) Act of 2005 (PL 109- plan/federal/prep--
exist. 148, Dec 30, 2005). act.html Public Law
109-148. PHS Act
Section 319(f)(3).
42 U.S.C. 247d-6d.
[See also Support
Antiterrorism by
Fostering Effective
Technologies (SAFE-
T) Act of 2002
[within Homeland
Security Act, Pub.
L. 107-296].]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18............... Row 18; Column 1...... Row 18; Column 2...... Row 18; Column 3......
Antitrust Provisions.. Assess need for, plan, Need ability to
and implement develop contingency
antitrust waiver plans and preliminary
authority under PAHPA communication and
2006 for R&D and technical
preparedness consultation.
activities to allow Continue and expand
nominally competing efforts such as those
parties to underway with
collaborate during a pandemic influenza
public health vaccine and adjuvant
emergency or to ``mix-and-match''
conduct contingency studies to assess
exercises before a safety and efficacy.
public-health
emergency. Involve
DoJ and Attorney
General in
supervisory/
compliance role.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corollary Elements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19............... Row 19; Column 1...... Row 19; Column 2...... Row 19; Column 3......
[[Page 40196]]
Attractiveness of Implement national Consolidate Medicare
commercial vaccine policies to provide coverage of all
market for support of adequate vaccines within Part
future R&D and reimbursement for B (not Part D).
manufacturing. vaccines and their
administration in
both the public and
private sectors, to
help underwrite and
sustain the
industrial base
needed for
biosecurity and
global-health
products.
Increase
administration
reimbursement rates
under Medicaid and
Vaccines for Children
(VFC) beneficiaries
with federal
subsidies to offset
increased State costs.
Third-party payers to
provide first-dollar
coverage for FDA-
licensed vaccines and
their administration
under healthcare
reform.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20............... Row 20; Column 1...... Row 20; Column 2...... Row 20; Column 3......
Approaches suitable Advanced Market Examples: Guarantee a
for developing-world Commitments (AMC) market in developing
situations (perhaps separately for countries for
useful by analogy). existing vaccines and pneumococcal vaccines
global health to prevent deadly
vaccines at R&D stage. respiratory
infections in
children and as an
incentive for
development of
vaccines that
currently do not
exist against
infectious disease
threats in those
countries, but which
may be imported into
the U.S. or threaten
global security.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Benefits to Involvement With Biosecurity Initiative
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21............... Row 21; Column 1...... Row 21; Column 2...... Row 21; Column 3......
Competitive situation. Don't put all eggs in Participation by
one basket, allow manufacturer with
multiple technologies U.S. Gov't withholds
and product scientific,
candidates to financial, and human-
progress capital benefit to
simultaneously competitors.
through development
pathways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22............... Row 22; Column 1...... Row 22; Column 3...... Row 22; Column 4.
New intellectual IP developed in course U.S. Gov't has step-
property. of government in rights if patent
contract remains with arising from federal
discoverer. government-funded
research not
exploited [Bayh-Dole
Act of 1980 (or
University & Small
Business Patent
Procedures Act),
codified in 35
U.S.C. 200-212[1],
implemented by 37
CFR 401[2]].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23............... Row 23; Column 1...... Row 23; Column 3...... Row 23; Column 4.
Staying abreast of Access to state-of-art Need to understand
advancing sciences. process analytics for exclusivity of
wide variety of access.
biological products.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations:
Project BioShield Act of 2004: Public Law 108-276, http://
frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_
public_laws&docid=f:publ276.108.pdf.
BioShield II (2005):
PAHPA, PL 109-417, Dec 19, 2006.
Bibliography:
Matheny J, Mair M, Mulcahy A, Smith BT. Incentives for
biodefense countermeasure
[[Page 40197]]
development. Biosecur Bioterror 2007 Sep;5(3):228-38.
Animal Rule = U.S. Food and Drug Administration. New drug and
biological drug products; evidence needed to demonstrate
effectiveness of new drugs when human efficacy studies are not
ethical or feasible. Final rule. FR 2002 May 31;67(105):37988-98.
http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/
PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=483712496781+5+2+0&WAISaction=retrieve.
BILLING CODE 4150-37-C
[[Page 40198]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11AU09.038
[[Page 40199]]
[FR Doc. E9-19199 Filed 8-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-37-C
|