1 May 2010
US Army Generals Not Informed HTS was Spy/Intel Program:
Casualty Rate Excessive
by John Stanton
"Let me tell you what HTT is not. The Team is not an intelligence gathering
tool which is used to target individuals." Colonel Martin Schweizter, USA,
in
testimony
before the US Congress, April 2008.
"Deployed HTTs work solely on the non-kinetic side of the military planning
and are not involved in the lethal targeting process." Steve Fondacaro &
Montgomery McFate writing in Men's Journal, February 12, 2009
Sources report that there are several investigations of HTS underway in addition
to the US Army's AR 15-6 effort.
Personalities that figure prominently in the life of HTS--and likely the
US Army's AR 15-6 investigation/other investigations of HTS--are Lieutenant
General Michael
Vane,
head of the US Army Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) at Fort Monroe,
Virginia.
ARCIC
is an element of the US Army's Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) and,
according to observers, oversees the ongoing AR 15-6. TRADOC is currently
commanded by General Martin
Dempsey.
His desk is where the "buck stops" on all matters TRADOC.
Retired US Army Colonel Maxie McFarland is the Deputy Chief of Staff for
Intelligence for TRADOC G-2 which, like Vane's shop, is located Fort Monroe,
Virginia. Retired US Army Colonel Steve Fondacaro, HTS program manager; and
Mitzy Coughlin (McFate), HTS senior social scientist round out what appears
to be the HTS chain of command: Dempsey-Vane-McFarland-Fondacaro---Carlough
(McFate).
According to observers, the current HTS structure and mission was approved
and "signed off" on as an intelligence capability. As reported previously,
HTS is funded as a Military Intelligence Program
(MIP).
Some in the TRADOC chain of command, according to sources, were unaware that
HTS was an intelligence support operation. This has caused a significant
amount of turbulence within the program, they say, as HTS management tries
to figure out how to re-package and justify the program's existence as an
intelligence support operation.
Observers say that McFarland, Fondacaro and Carlough (McFate) falsely advertised
the HTS program as pure social science research to universities, at various
social science conferences, and particularly in their recruiting and training
processes. This has grave implications for universities and their researchers
as many were convinced that their work-product was being used for humanitarian
purposes.
The US Army could pull the funding from MIP and place it under a research
function in the defense budget. But management's credibility quotient has
sunk to unrecoverable depths and any attempt at claiming an error in the
US Army budget process using "it was not supposed to be in the MIP, it was
a mistake rationale" would be as ridiculous as hiring a horseshoer on to
a Human Terrain Team.
But wait! They did! According to a Wapedia entry on the Human Terrain System,
" HTS hired an unemployed and former US Marine who had been retired from
the USMC for 23 years. The former US Marine had recently undergone shoulder
replacement surgery and could no longer shoe horses
"
Critics of HTS such as the observers/sources for this series of articles
on HTS, Dr. Max Forte, Dr. David Price, Dr. Hugh Gusterson, Dr. Alberto Gonzalez,
Dr. Robert Albro, and the
American
Anthropological Association have made the point over and
again that HTS is ethically challenged at the management level and does,
in fact, operate as an intelligence support program. For stating their views
they have been pilloried by McFarland, Fondacaro and Coughlin (McFate) and
their supporters in and out of the military (sources report that the officer
currently conducting the AR 15-6 is being "bad mouthed" by some in HTS
management). Even the venerable Ben Connable who authored
All
Our Eggs in One Broken Basket (HTS) in TRADOC's Military
Review was criticized for expressing the view that the effort was cannibalizing
military funding and in-house capabilities.
The focus on preparing/shaping the Human/Cultural Terrain for warfighters
originated with the
Defense
Science Boards 2006 Summer Study
on Strategic Vectors. HTS is-and always has
been--intelligence
support program and the information it produces is used
to prepare/shape the human terrain and to enhances the kill/pacify chain.
Now the spin from HTS personnel appears to be that HTS is not an intelligence
program in the traditional sense. They are correct: it is a "new" intelligence
program based on old intelligence programs. Some believe that it is little
more than a
polling
and community policing effort.
Answering the question Do They Want to Hug Us or Kill Us? is the responsibility
of the active duty military. It must not be left to a hodge-podge of civilian
contractors lured by high salaries and led by some in HTS management desperate
to build a Human Terrain Agency replete with splendid offices in Kansas City.
There is indeed a role for social scientists and it is inside the wire, not
outside it.
Life and limb have been sacrificed in HTS management's quest to prove a point
and get rich in the process. It's astonishing that a miniscule social science
program like HTS should have such a high casualty rate and generate so much
controversy. More repugnant is that the HTS chain of command is numb to it
all.
It's always worth remembering :
* Paula Loyd-killed/died of wounds
* Nicole Suveges--killed
* Michael V. Bhatia--killed
* Lt Brian Brennan--(both legs amputated)
* Wesley Cureton--wounded, status unknown
* Scott Wilson--wounded, status unknown
* D. Ayala--guilty of manslaughter
* A. Salam, Afghani National killed by Ayala
* Issa Salomi--Hostage, released March 2010
* Name Unknown-shot in chest
* Name Unknown-wounded in vehicle rollover
* Name Unknown-wounded in vehicle rollover
__________
John Stanton is a Virginia based writer specializing in national security
matters. Reach him at cioran123[at]yahoo.com.
John Stanton's Human Terrain System articles:
http://cryptome.org/0001/hts-stanton.htm
|