6307C17 SHSpec-286 Dating "Accuracy in dating is the single most important function of the auditor." Since last October, LRH has been studying something with intensity. It took the preceding couple of years to determine that goals and related mental phenomena come down to engrams and the time track. The difficulty with running engrams from 1950 on was the number of cases that couldn't run the time track. Years were spent on improving cases. In October, the time track assumed greater importance, up to the point where LRH discovered that the GPM was an implant. At that point, we had to discover whether or not a person could go clear without running the time track and engrams. There had already been a lot of failures with getting people to run on the time track. LRH has always operated on the assumption that everyone could make it to OT. A few weeks ago he had to consider whether only fifty percent could go on to OT. This was a serious question, which he had never before wondered about. Research since October has been very rough. It has had to be done more rapidly, because it was obvious that we didn't have much time left, as proven by the January FDA raid. That was one reason that LRH decided to bypass clear and go for OT. Clear is an an aberrated, comfortable human state which society can accept. OT is something else. It is like making a "playground supervisor" vs. a "commando". With the government attack on scientology, we had no time margin to let us take care of clear first, then go for OT. So we are into research concerning how to make an OT. When you accelerate research, you get problems, because you have taken time out where you need time. In the last few months, the work LRH has done per unit of time exceeds anything previously attempted. The fact that "if you can't run the time track, you'll never get to OT" emerged. However, what also emerged was that with R3R, if you get the right chain with the right date and duration, you can get anyone to run with sonic and visio. That wasn't a solution unless the PC also got TA action. TA action is the key to all case progress, because it measures charge blown, hence improved reality and better ability to confront the track. The PC's reality must improve, or he can't go any earlier on the track. If you process someone without TA, you would be doing him more good by taking him for a walk in the park. "TA motion tells you how much mass you are discharging off the reactive bank." Where TA is not moving, you are not discharging mass. You can tell in the records that this is happening by observing that the same goals are being set for every session, and the PC is getting only lukewarm gains. That co-ordinates with no TA action. That was what caused LRH to wonder if fifty percent would never make it to OT. There was the thin hope that, by running lower level processes, you could get enough charge off so that the PC could run track with TA. It was a pretty frail hope. Doing this could produce keyed-out clears, but that is not good enough. The world is going down fast, and no new solutions are appearing to handle crises. We are the only new factor in the world. In order to meet the present situation, the scientologist in the U.S. will have to produce at least spectacular case results or a spectacular being. The problem now is: what is absence of TA? "TA action disappears off a case to the degree that time is in error." And there is the answer. TA "does not cease because you have run a wrong goal," or from ARC breaks, or a failure to run a GPM. It is because of wrong time. "Time is the single source of human aberration." This datum now emerges as a more important truth than we had realized. "The GPM is totally devoted to scrambling someone's time." So if you can't get the GPM's off the case, you can't unaberrate him. GPM's are hard to date, but they must be gotten off the case. GPM's have a characteristic sound. There is a slow statement of the goal; in earlier GPM's, this was preceded by a "Crack!" So they sounded like this, "Spat! ss-ss-ss-ss-ss-ss ... Spat! ... Non - sen - si - cal - ly ... Spat!" Part of the aberrative factor is the PC's effort to speed it up, to get it to run at a speed that he is comfortable with. He is speedy. Sometimes people can't get rocket reads off of items because they don't duplicate the speed of the items. They go very slowly, the the thetan thinks, "why doesn't it get over with?" The double-firing principle of GPM's also messed up the thetan and hung him up in time. It gave a positive or negative charge to two opposing sentiments. It hit him from the right and from the left. It made him feel as though he couldn't move but had to move to get out of the way of it. He would also get into a time-scrambler. The total purpose of the GPM was to scramble time. GPM engrams are the hardest engrams to date. A PC can't scan through a GPM. You have to use repeater technique, because if you try to scan through it, it all goes black, because the PC protested it all the way through. In running it, you rekindle the protest he had when he got the implant. That turns the engram black. Then you can't see anything in it, and he can't move on the track, and he is all frozen up in the thing. The only thing that stops TA action is wrong dates, wrong time. And no TA action equals no processing. The perfection of your auditing alone won't solve this. So dating accurately is necessary to get TA action. This doesn't mean dating down to the last microsecond. Your errors are the gross ones, e.g. dating something at 945 years ago, and it is really 145 trillion years ago. Very approximate dates back in the trillions of trillions of years ago is vastly sloppy, but it is successful enough to get TA. To straighten out a case where the TA has ceased, you clean up "On time, in auditing" or "On dating", with an eighteen-button prepcheck. You should also clean "Wrong dates" and "wrong time" as long as the needle is rough on the subject. This could in or out of auditing. You handle by: 1. Finding when the wrong dates were found: times when things were wrongly dated. You don't, at first, redate these things. 2. When that is all cleaned up, run down what was wrongly dated and clean it up with the PC, even if you have to redate it. You will see TA action restored to the case. You want wrong dates that the PC guessed at or assumed earlier in auditing. You continue to clean up the area until the needle is really clean and all the wrongness and upset has been cleared out of the way. Now the PC will date easily. Someone who is an auditor will also need the wrong dates that he has found on PC's and his anxiety on the subject all cleaned up, too. If you got the right date and right duration, you will get perception. If the incident has a GPM in it, the perception goes off because you have restimulated the PC's protest. Dub-in itself is simply a phenomenon of wrong dates. You could produce the effect of dub-in by deliberately giving the PC a wrong date and wrong duration and sending him to the wrong point on the track. Then you will get a collection of apparently dubbed-in pictures and no TA. Wrong items are tough on a PC. Wrong line plots are a result of wrong time. Sometimes you will flatten a chain, and the TA will go up. This has something to do with wrong dates more deeply seated in the case than you can overcome without reassessment. The PC has overstepped his own reality. If the PC has trouble whenever he goes on the backtrack, because it is all unreal and he can't believe it, what is his wrong date? It is the notion that life began at birth. His error on time is on the length of the time track. This is a trap mechanism. Clean up all his considerations on the subject, and his ability to run track will change. Look at the entrapment value of this limited-track business and see how much fuss current society's savants make about past lives! No one protests against truth unless they have a vested interest in maintaining a lie. Every PC tends to get their track tolerance extended as they find correct dates in the portion of the track that they can run fairly easily. Any case will hit a ceiling of reality on the subject of dating, but people only creak to the degree that there is wrong time. A wrong date can sneak in on you without your doing any dating. For instance, you assume that a certain GPM is in the Helatrobus implant, when it is really a goal that is much closer to PT. By running it with the Helatrobus line plot, you have incorrectly dated it. Never leave a wrong goal, or, even more importantly, a wrong date on a case. If the case has been run on R3R and TA action is doubtful, clean up wrong dates and all possible charge on the subject of dates, dating, etc. If a case is getting TA action, don't harass the PC about it, but if there are ARC breaks, look into wrong time, always. Also look into wrong assessment. Some cases are very nervy about time and wrong dates. They can hardly take it if you make a small error on a date. Getting all the dates straightened out will improve this case, even if nothing is run. Don't invalidate the PC by checking all his dates. Do it periodically, just checking for wrong dates every now and then, in session. Date things in terms on "years ago", since the PC has been on other planets with dating systems that are different from Earth's AD and BC. The "wrong date" phenomena extend to other parts of auditing. For instance, the PC may be doing an objective process, walking through the room, through facsimiles of Maypoles. Merely in the act of doing that, the PC gets reality on the room and gets the PC date, which straightens out the track to that extent. You could date the facsimiles, whenever the PC hits one and then return the PC to walking around the room. You could probably take a case that couldn't remember half of this lifetime and accurately date things. This would give him tremendous reality on things that he had never remembered before.