6205C29 SHSpec-153  Security Check Prepchecking

     [The material of this lecture is summarized in HCOB 10May62 "Prepchecking
and Sec Checking".]

                      [Details on prepchecking procedure.]

     When prepchecking ruds, you are talking to the person about those things
which are very pertinent to the subject of auditing.  These we have to have
in.  If the PC is living a life of secrecy, we will find that ruds will go out
even after having been put in broadly with prepchecking.  There is possibly
something so wrong with the PC that a Joburg [Same as Form 3. See p. 239,
above.]

is needed to clean him up.  Cases that go mad actually have a number of missed
withholds.  It is the missedness that makes them go mad.  Their reach into an
area is very difficult; their departure from an area is difficult, and the
number of crimes they have under their hats is incredible.  Their ruds go out
as fast as you can get them in, because there is a tremendous weight of
unknownness on the case.  The more closely the crimes are related to injuring
scientology, the less you will be able to get ruds in.

     Do recognize that if you can't keep the PC's ruds in, the PC has overts,
no matter how innocent he may seem.  People who invalidate E-meters and have a
Hell of a time in session are having a Hell of a time in life, just because of
their overts.  The easy way to get it off is to take some broad, pervasive
thing like a Joburg, which has every crime known to Man or beast on it.  Using
the Joburg, you will clip some corner of what they have been doing.  The PC
would be damaged if the withholds were known, so he doesn't give them up
easily.  When one gets too many overts and withholds that are too damaging to
oneself, one wants to get the Hell out.  The extremity of blowing from missed
withholds is dying.

     If you are auditing such a case, expecting that his overts will be of the
magnitude of picking flowers in someone else's garden, you will let them go
ahead and croak, out of kindness.  Such a PC has a short attention span --
like if they are sick, etc. -- so the auditor has to be fairly quick.  He must
parallel what the mind is doing, find where the person doesn't want to go back
to and what the people there don't know about the person, what he is hiding,
etc.

     Since the pat list doesn't go straight to the area where the PC has his
attention, it has the liability of boring the PC to death before you get to
his particular crime or item.  You must do it well and positively to minimize
his dispersal of attention.  So handle things swiftly when you are cleaning up
the relatively uncharged questions, the ones that clean up with one incident.
A good speed would be ten to twelve chains really prepchecked well per hour,
plus twelve or so null questions.  That speed keeps up the PC's interest.

     A fairly precise patter is being developed.  You need to word a question
so it keeps getting a hot read, and you need to get the question itself
answered, not some motivator version.  If you take a motivator, you will often
find yourself spending a long time and going nowhere, just throwing end-ruds
out [E.g. half-truths, untruths, damaging others, etc.  See p. 244, above.]
like mad.  When you realize you have done this, go back and check it.  Don't
go on pursuing the wrong course.

     Canned lists scrape up areas that pcs are trying to avoid.  Done well,
you can now prepcheck rudiments so that they will stay in and you can go on to
Routine 3.  In checking up on past prepchecks, look over only the "what"
questions, not the form in toto or the zero questions.  The process of
prepchecking increases the person's responsibility, so Form 3 questions may
now be alive that weren't when it was done before.  The "what" questions that
have really been nulled won't come alive again.  If you find one of these
alive, you are justified in chewing out the auditor.  The ones that are null
will be stably gained.