Subject: FZ Bible - Level 4 Coursepack [6/7] Repost [x2] Date: 26 Nov 1999 23:21:04 -0000 From: squirrel@echelon.alias.net (The Tech Lion) Organization: FreeZone Bible Association Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST Academy Level IV Coursepack: Part 6 of 7 *************************************** Thanksgiving time is here. We at FZ Bible Association would like to give thanks to Ron for leaving us a bounty of Tech. And celebrate by disseminating it freely to all. In that spirit we bring you the Level 4 coursepack, from the late 80's. Happy Turkey Day, -Tech Lion ******************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heretics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************ PART 6 28. HCOB 22 July 1963 You Can Be Right 29. HCOB 1 Sept 1963 Routine Three SC 30. HCOB 5 Sept 1978 Anatomy of a Service Facsimile 31. HCOB 6 Sept 1978 II Service Facsimiles and Rock Slams 32. HCOB 6 Sept 1978 III Routine Three SC-A Full Service Facsimile Handling Updated with New Era Dianetics ****************************************************************** 28. HCOB 22 July 1963 You Can Be Right HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JULY 1963 MA Franchise BPI YOU CAN BE RIGHT Rightness and wrongness form a common source of argument and struggle. The concept of rightness reaches very high and very low on the Tone Scale. And the effort to be right is the last conscious striving of an individual on the way out. I-am-right-and-they-are-wrong is the lowest concept that can be formulated by an unaware case. What is right and what is wrong are not necessarily definable for everyone. These vary according to existing moral codes and disciplines and, before Scientology, despite their use in law as a test of "sanity," had no basis in fact but only in opinion. In Dianetics and Scientology a more precise definition arose. And the definition became as well the true definition of an overt act. An overt act is not just injuring someone or something: an overt act is an act of omission or commission which does the least good for the least number of dynamics or the most harm to the greatest number of dynamics. (See the eight dynamics.) Thus, a wrong action is wrong to the degree that it harms the greatest number of dynamics. And a right action is right to the degree that it benefits the greatest number of dynamics. Many people think that an action is an overt simply because it is destructive. To them all destructive actions or omissions are overt acts. This is not true. For an act of commission or omission to be an overt act it must harm the greater number of dynamics. A failure to destroy can be, therefore, an overt act. Assistance to something that would harm a greater number of dynamics can also be an overt act. An overt act is something that harms broadly. A beneficial act is something that helps broadly. It can be a beneficial act to harm something that would be harmful to the greater number of dynamics. Harming everything and helping everything alike can be overt acts. Helping certain things and harming certain things alike can be beneficial acts. The idea of not harming anything and helping everything are alike rather mad. It is doubtful if you would think helping enslavers was a beneficial action and equally doubtful if you would consider the destruction of a disease an overt act. In the matter of being right or being wrong, a lot of muddy thinking can develop. There are no absolute rights or absolute wrongs. And being right does not consist of being unwilling to harm and being wrong does not consist only of not harming. There is an irrationality about "being right" which not only throws out the validity of the legal test of sanity but also explains why some people do very wrong things and insist they are doing right. The answer lies in an impulse, inborn in everyone, to try to be right. This is an insistence which rapidly becomes divorced from right action. And it is accompanied by an effort to make others wrong, as we see in hypercritical cases. A being who is apparently unconscious is still being right and making others wrong. It is the last criticism. We have seen a "defensive person" explaining away the most flagrant wrongnesses. This is "justification" as well. Most explanations of conduct, no matter how far-fetched, seem perfectly right to the person making them since he or she is only asserting self-rightness and other-wrongness. We have long said that that which is not admired tends to persist. If no one admires a person for being right, then that person's "brand of being right" will persist, no matter how mad it sounds. Scientists who are aberrated cannot seem to get many theories. They do not because they are more interested in insisting on their own odd rightnesses than they are in finding truth. Thus, we get strange "scientific truths" from men who should know better, including the late Einstein. Truth is built by those who have the breadth and balance to see also where they're wrong. You have heard some very absurd arguments out among the crowd. Realize that the speaker was more interested in asserting his or her own rightness than in being right. A thetan tries to be right and fights being wrong. This is without regard to being right about something or to do actual right. It is an insistence which has no concern with a rightness of conduct. One tries to be right always, right down to the last spark. How, then, is one ever wrong? It is this way: One does a wrong action, accidentally or through oversight. The wrongness of the action or inaction is then in conflict with one's necessity to be right. So one then may continue and repeat the wrong action to prove it is right. This is a fundamental of aberration. All wrong actions are the result of an error followed by an insistence on having been right. Instead of righting the error (which would involve being wrong) one insists the error was a right action and so repeats it. As a being goes down scale, it is harder and harder to admit having been wrong. Nay, such an admission could well be disastrous to any remaining ability or sanity. For rightness is the stuff of which survival is made. And as one approaches the last ebb of survival, one can only insist on having been right, for to believe for a moment one has been wrong is to court oblivion. The last defense of any being is "I was right." That applies to anyone. When that defense crumbles, the lights go out. So we are faced with the unlovely picture of asserted rightness in the face of flagrant wrongness. And any success in making the being realize their wrongness results in an immediate degradation, unconsciousness or, at best, a loss of personality. Pavlov, Freud, psychiatry alike never grasped the delicacy of these facts and so evaluated and punished the criminal and insane into further criminality and insanity. All justice today contains in it this hidden error -- that the last defense is a belief in personal rightness regardless of charges and evidence alike, and that the effort to make another wrong results only in degradation. But all this would be a hopeless impasse leading to highly chaotic social conditions were it not for one saving fact: All repeated and "incurable" wrongnesses stem from the exercise of a last defense: "trying to be right." Therefore, the compulsive wrongness can be cured no matter how mad it may seem or how thoroughly its rightness is insisted upon. Getting the offender to admit his or her wrongness is to court further degradation and even unconsciousness or the destruction of a being. Therefore, the purpose of punishment is defeated and punishment has minimal workability. But by getting the offender off the compulsive repetition of the wrongness, one then cures it. But how? By rehabilitating the ability to be right! This has limitless application -- in training, in social skills, in marriage, in law, in life. Example: A wife is always burning dinner. Despite scolding, threats of divorce, anything, the compulsion continues. One can wipe this wrongness out by getting her to explain what is right about her cooking. This may well evoke a raging tirade in some extreme cases, but if one flattens the question, that all dies away and she happily ceases to burn dinners. Carried to classic proportions but not entirely necessary to end the compulsion, a moment in the past will be recovered when she accidentally burned a dinner and could not face up to having done a wrong action. To be right she thereafter had to burn dinners. Go into a prison and find one sane prisoner who says he did wrong. You won't find one. Only the broken wrecks will say so out of terror of being hurt. But even they don't believe they did wrong. A judge on a bench, sentencing criminals, would be given pause to realize that not one malefactor sentenced really thought he had done wrong and will never believe it in fact, though he may seek to avert wrath by saying so. The do-gooder crashes into this continually and is given his loses by it. But marriage, law and crime do not constitute all the spheres of living where this applies. These facts embrace all of life. The student who can't learn, the worker who can't work, the boss who can't boss are all caught on one side of the right-wrong question. They are being completely one-sided. They are being "last-ditch-right." And opposing them, those who would teach them are fixed on the other side, "admit-you-are-wrong." And out of this we get not only no-change but actual degradation where it "wins." But there are no wins in this imbalance, only loses for both. Thetans on the way down don't believe they are wrong because they don't dare believe it. And so they do not change. Many a preclear in processing is only trying to prove himself right and the auditor wrong, particularly the lower case levels, and so we sometimes get no-change sessions. And those who won't be audited at all are totally fixed on asserted rightness and are so close to gone that any question of their past rightness would, they feel, destroy them. I get my share of this when a being, close to extinction, and holding contrary views, grasps for a moment the rightness of Scientology and then in sudden defense asserts his own "rightnesses," sometimes close to terror. It would be a grave error to go on letting an abuser of Scientology abuse. The route is to get him or her to explain how right he or she is without explaining how wrong Scientology is, for to do the last is to let them commit a serious overt. "What is right about your mind" would produce more case change and win more friends than any amount of evaluation or punishment to make them wrong. You can be right. How? By getting another to explain how he or she is right -- until he or she, being less defensive now, can take a less compulsive point of view. You don't have to agree with what they think. You only have to acknowledge what they say. And suddenly they can be right. A lot of things can be done by understanding and using this mechanism. It will take, however, some study of this article before it can be gracefully applied -- for all of us are reactive to some degree on this subject. And those who sought to enslave us did not neglect to install a right-wrong pair of items on the far backtrack. But these won't really get in your way. As Scientologists, we are faced by a frightened society who think they would be wrong if we were found to be right. We need a weapon to correct this. We have one here. And you can be right, you know. I was probably the first to believe you were, mechanism or no mechanism. The road to rightness is the road to survival. And every person is somewhere on that scale. You can make yourself right, amongst other ways, by making others right enough to afford to change their minds. Then a lot more of us will arrive. L. RON HUBBARD Founder (Note: This is the first in a series of HCO Bulletins designed for publication in continental magazines. I am developing a whole presentation of Scientology at this level for general use in life. Follow this HCO Bulletin with the next in magazines.) LRH:gl.jh.cden.gm  ****************************************************************** 29. HCOB 1 Sept 1963 Routine Three SC HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 1 SEPTEMBER 1963 Central Orgs Franchise SCIENTOLOGY THREE CLEARING--CLEARING--CLEARING ROUTINE THREE SC There has been such a rush on in technical that it may have looked to you that we were in a state of rapid change. This was occasioned by a speed-up caused by various events. You are getting about a century of research (or more) in a very few months. So bear with me. The end is not only in sight. It's here. My job is mainly now to refine and get the data to you. The order brought into our work by making FIVE LEVELS OF SCIENTOLOGY is paying off rapidly. Level One is in development. Level Two is well away. Level Four is complete. And suddenly Level Three leaped to a final phase. We can CLEAR, CLEAR, CLEAR. This has been a stepchild for months, even years now. It has been mauled, messed up, invalidated and rehabilitated and knocked around. But a BOOK ONE CLEAR was what most people came into Scientology to obtain. And now I've done it. I've found out why not and how. And this HCO Bulletin is a hurry-skurry outline of the steps so you can do it. There will be lots of HCO Bulletins on this. The tapes of 27, 28 and 29 Aug. 63, give most of its theory. CLEAR DEFINED -- Book One definition holds exactly true. A Clear is somebody with no "held down fives" in this lifetime (see Dianetics: The Evolution of a Science). CLEAR TEST -- Clear sits at Clear read on the TA with a free needle. No natter. No upsets. No whole track keyed in. No SERVICE FACSIMILE. CLEAR STABILITY -- We are not concerned with stability. But we can now key out so thoroughly that we need not stress "Keyed-Out Clear." I have found the means, I am sure, to make this state far more stable and recreate it easily if it slips. So forgive me for being indecisive about Clear states for these past many months. The breakthrough is stated as follows: IF YOU CANNOT MAKE A CLEAR IN A 25-HOUR PREPCHECK, THE PC HAS ONE OR MORE SERVICE FACSIMILES. The barrier to clearing and the reason for fast relapse when Clear was attained has been the SERVICE FACSIMILE. SERVICE FACSIMILE defined: Advanced Procedure and Axioms definition accurate. Added to this is THE SERVICE FACSIMILE IS THAT COMPUTATION GENERATED BY THE PRECLEAR (NOT THE BANK) TO MAKE SELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG, TO DOMINATE OR ESCAPE DOMINATION AND ENHANCE OWN SURVIVAL AND INJURE THAT OF OTHERS. Note that it is generated by the pc, not the bank. Thus, the pc restimulates the bank with the computation; the bank, unlike going to OT, does not retard the pc in this instance. The service facsimile is usually a this-lifetime effort only. It might better be called a SERVICE COMPUTATION but we'll hold to our old terms. The pc is doing it. In usual aberration the bank is doing it (the pc's engrams, etc.). Where you can't clear the pc by auditing just bank, you have to get out of the road what the pc is doing to stay aberrated. If you clear only what the bank is doing, the Clear state rapidly relapses. If you clear what the pc is doing, the bank tends to stay more quiet and unrestimulated. It is the pc who mostly keys his bank back in. Therefore, the pc who won't go free-needle Clear is himself unconsciously preventing it. And by knocking out this effort we can then key out the bank and we have a fast Clear who pretty well stays Clear (until sent on to OT). The state is desirable to attain as it speeds going to OT. All this came from studies I've been doing of the tone arm. The tone arm must move during auditing or the pc gets worse. All those pcs whose tone arms don't easily get into action and hang up are SERVICE FACSIMILE pcs. Note that the SERVICE FACSIMILE is used to: FIRST: Make self right Make others wrong SECOND: To avoid domination To dominate others THIRD: To increase own survival To hinder the survival of others. The service facsimile is all of it logical gobbledegook. It doesn't make good sense. That's because the pc adopted it where, in extreme cases, he or she felt endangered by something but could not itsa it. Hence it's illogical. Because it is senseless, really, the computation escapes casual inspection and makes for aberrated behavior. TO MAKE A CLEAR The steps, in brief, are: 1. ESTABLISH SERVICE FAC. This is done by assessment of Scientology List One of 2-12 and using that for a starter and then using the Preliminary Step of R3R as published (HCO Bulletin of 1 July 63). One uses only things found by assessment, never by wild guesses or pc's obvious disabilities. These assessments already exist on many cases and should be used as earlier found. 2. AUDIT WITH RIGHT-WRONG. Ask pc, with itsa line carefully in, FIRST QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (whatever was found) make you right?" Adjust question until pc can answer it, if pc can't. Don't force it off on pc. If it's correct, it will run well. Don't keep repeating the question unless pc needs it. Just let pc answer and answer and answer. Let pc come to a cognition or run out of answers or try to answer the next question prematurely and switch questions to: SECOND QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (whatever was found) make others wrong?" Treat this the same way. Let the pc come to a cog, or run out of answers or accidentally start to answer the first question. Go back to first question. Do the same with it. Then to second question. Then to first question again, then to second. If your assessment was right, pc will be getting better and better TA action. But the TA action will eventually lessen. On any big cognition, end the process. This may all take from 2 hours to 5, 1 don't think more. The idea is not to beat the process to death or sink pc into bank GPMs. The pc will have automaticities (answers coming too fast to be said easily) early in the run. These must be gone and pc bright when you end. You are only trying to end the compulsive character of the service facsimile so found and get it off automatic and get pc to see it better, not to remove all TA action from the process. 3. AUDIT SECOND PROCESS. Using the same method of auditing as in (2) above, use the THIRD QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (same one used in step 2) help you escape domination?" When this seems cooled off, use FOURTH QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (same one) help you dominate others?" Use THIRD QUESTION and FOURTH QUESTION again and until pc has it all cooled off or a big cognition. 4. AUDIT THIRD PROCESS. Using the same method as in (2) above, use the FIFTH QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (same one) aid your survival?" and then SIXTH QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (same one) hinder the survival of others?" Use FIVE and SIX as long as is necessary to cool it all off or to produce a big cognition. 5. PREPCHECK WITH BIG MID RUDS, using the question, "In this lifetime, on (same one) has anything been ______?" and get in Suppress, Careful of, Failed to reveal, Invalidate, Suggest, Mistake been made, Protest, Anxious about, Decided. If the pc has a really shattering cognition, just halt Prepcheck and end it off. This Prepcheck is done, of course, off the meter until the pc says no, then checking it on the meter and cleaning it off. Once you've gone to meter on a button, stay with meter for further queries. But don't clean cleans and don't leave slows or speeded rises either. And don't cut pc's itsa line. ---------- That should be the end of a service facsimile. But a pc may have several, so do it all again through all steps as often as is needed. Pcs who have had Scientology List One of R2-12 should be given these as the first things used. Pcs who have had assessments done for R3R chains should have these assessment results used (or as much of them as apply) for the next runs. Even if the chain assessment has been run on R3R still use it for R3SC. ---------- COMPLETING CLEARING To complete clearing, then, it is only necessary to give a permissive In This Lifetime 18-button Prepcheck making the pc look hard for answers, short of ARC breaking pc. And you should have a beautiful free needle and TA at the Clear read and the pc shining. ---------- If clearing did not occur, these following faults were present in the auditing: 1. Pc did not agree with assessment, it read only because pc did not understand it or protested it. 2. The assessment was wrong. 3. The atmosphere of auditing was critical of pc. 4. The itsa line was not in. 5. The auditor let the itsa line wander to early track. 6. The auditor Q-and-Aed and went off process and into engrams on pc's "sell." 7. The process was not done. 8. The assessment was done by physical disability inspection or by choosing pc's habits, not by actual assessment. 9. The auditing did not produce TA action (wrong assessment and/or itsa line out would be all that could produce no TA action). 10. Pc already sitting in a heavy ARC break by reason of whole- track bypassed charge. 11. This process used instead of an ARC break assessment well done, thus making this process a punishment. 12. Questions phrased wrong. 13. Questions were overrun. 14. Questions were underrun. 15. Auditor too choppy on Prepchecking. 16. ARC breaks in these sessions were not cleaned up. 17. Pc trying to plunge into early track and stay restimulated. 18. Pc trying to get early-track GPMs or engrams run to avoid giving up service facsimile. 19. Auditor missed withholds accumulated during clearing. 20. Process end product "Clear" overestimated by auditor, pc or Supervisors. ---------- The keynote of clearing a service facsimile is INTEREST. If pc isn't interested in it, the assessment is wrong. The keynote of auditing tone is permissive, happy, easy, not militant. Let pc run on and on. On phrasing question, no matter what is assessed it is always IT MAKES PC RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG. Pc is not trying to make it wrong. ---------- An ordinary Prepcheck, done with a service facsimile present, will turn on mass on the pc. Why? Pc is asserting service facsimile. ---------- Well, that's the fast rundown on R3SC (Routine Three, Service Facsimile Clear). And that's clearing. A lot of theory is missing in this HCO Bulletin but not one essential step. You can do it. If a person is cleared before going on to OT, they make it hundreds of hours faster! (NOTE: All OT processes will shortly be released with R4 designations but with little other change.) L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:jw.cden.gm  ****************************************************************** 30. HCOB 5 Sept 1978 Anatomy of a Service Facsimile HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 SEPTEMBER 1978 Remimeo Level IV Checksheets Class IV Auditors Supervisors C/Ses ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE Refs: HCOB 22 July 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT HCOB 1 Sept 63 ROUTINE THREE SC HCOB 23 Aug. 66 SERVICE FACSIMILE HCOB 30 Nov. 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES Tape: 6308C27 SH Spec 299 RIGHTNESS AND WRONGNESS Tape: 6309C04 SH Spec 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE Tape: 6309C03 SH Spec 302A R3SC Tape: 6309C05 SH Spec 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT Tape: 6309C18 SH Spec 308 ST. HILL SERVICE FAC HANDLING FACSIMILE:A mental picture unknowingly created; a copy of the physical universe environment, complete with all the perceptions, at some time in the past. SERVICE: A method of providing a person with the use of something; the action or result of giving assistance or advantage; work done; duty performed. COMPUTATION: That aberrated evaluation and postulate that one must be in a certain state in order to succeed. SERVICE FACSIMILE: THE SERVICE FACSIMILE IS THAT COMPUTATION GENERATED BY THE PRECLEAR (NOT THE BANK) TO MAKE SELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG: TO DOMINATE OR ESCAPE DOMINATION AND ENHANCE OWN SURVIVAL AND INJURE THAT OF OTHERS. Note that it is a computation, not a doingness, beingness or havingness. We could call this a "service computation" but we will maintain the term we have used to describe this phenomenon throughout the technology: "service facsimile." It is a computation that the pc adopted when, in an extreme situation, he felt endangered by something but could not itsa it. It is called a service facsimile because he uses it; it is "of service" to him. Aberration, anybody's aberration on any subject, has been of some use to them at some time or other. You can trace it back. It's been of some use, otherwise they wouldn't keep mocking it up. But now, if you put it up against survival standards, you'd find it very nonsurvival. The pc adopted this because he couldn't stand the confusion in a situation. So he adopted a safe solution. A safe solution is always adopted as a retreat from the environmental restimulation. He adopted a safe solution in that instance and he survived. His safe solution became his stable datum. He has hung onto it ever since. It is the computation, the fixed idea, he uses to handle life, his service facsimile. HOW THE SERVICE FACSIMILE BECOMES FIXED An idea is the thing most easily substituted for a thetan. An idea doesn't have any mass connected with it basically. And it appears to have some wisdom in it so it's very easily substituted for a thetan. Thus, the idea, the stable datum he has adopted, is substituted for the thetan. How does this stable datum become so fixed? It gets fixed, and more and more firmly as time goes on, by the confusion it is supposed to handle but doesn't. The stable datum was adopted in lieu of inspection. The person ceased to inspect, he fell back from inspecting, he fell back from living. He put the datum there to substitute for his own observation and his own coping with life, and at that moment he started an accumulation of confusion. That which is not confronted and inspected tends to persist. Thus, in the absence of his own confronting mass collects. The stable datum forbids inspection. It's an automatic solution. It's "safe." It solves everything. He no longer has to inspect to solve, so he never as-ises the mass. He gets caught in the middle of the mass. And it collects more and more confusion and his ability to inspect becomes less and less. The more he isn't confronting, the less he can confront. This becomes a dwindling spiral. So the thing he has adopted to handle his environment for him is the thing which reduces his ability to handle his environment. Those things which do not respond to routine auditing, that routine auditing won't change, are rooted in this mechanism. Therefore, it is important to find the idea on which he is so fixed. Pull the fixed idea and you free the individual for a broader perimeter of inspection. In service fac handling, the reason you get tone arm action when the fixed idea has been pulled is that the confusion which has been amassed and dammed up for so long is now running off. RIGHT/WRONG, DOMINATE AND SURVIVE Right and wrong are the tools of survival. In order to survive you have to be right. There is a level at which true rightness is analytical, and there is a level at which rightness and wrongness cease to be analytical or comprehensible. When it drops below that point, it's aberration. The point you degenerate from survive to succumb is the point you recognize you are wrong. That is the beginning of succumb. The moment one becomes worried about his own survival, he enters into the necessity to dominate in order to survive. It goes: the insistence upon survival, followed by the necessity to dominate, followed then by the necessity to be right. These postulates go downhill. So you get an aberrated rightness or wrongness. The game of domination consists of making the other fellow wrong in order to be right. That is the essence of the service facsimile. The reason the service facsimile isn't rational is because you have A=A=A's along the whole line. Coming down the line, it works itself back and forth in an aberrated A=A=A. If the individual is surviving, he must be right. And people will defend the most fantastic wrongnesses on the basis they are being right. In PT and at any point along the track, the fellow is trying to be right, trying to be right, trying to be right. Whatever he's doing, he's trying to be right. In order to survive you have to be right more than you're wrong, so you get the obsession to be right in order to survive. The lie is that he can't do anything else except survive. It isn't that trying to be right is wrong -- it's obsessively being right about something that's obviously wrong. That's when the individual is no longer able to select his own course of behavior. When he is obsessively following courses of behavior which are uninspected in order to be right. There is nothing sane about a service facsimile; there is no rationality to it. The computation does not fit the incident or event occurring. It simply enforces, exaggerates and destroys freedom of choice over the exercise of ability to be happy or powerful or normal or active. It destroys power, destroys freedom of choice. Wherever that zone or area is, you'll see the individual worsening. He is on a dwindling spiral. But he himself is generating it. The intention to be right is the strongest intention in the universe. Above it you have the effort to dominate and above that you have the effort to survive. These things are strong. But we're talking here about a mental activity. A thinking activity. An intentional activity. Survival -- that just happens. Domination -- that just happens. Those are not intended things. But you get down along the level of intended and it's right or wrong. The strongest intention in the universe. It is always an aberrated solution. It always exists in PT and is part of the environment of the pc. He's generating it. It's his solution. Overwhelmed as he is by it, he is still generating it. It's aberrated because it's an uninspected solution. And it is something that everyone, unintentionally or otherwise, is telling the pc is wrong and causing him to assert that it is right. The perfect solution when he first got hold of it. But now it monitors his life; it's living his life for him. And it doesn't even vaguely begin to take care of his life. That is the anatomy of the service facsimile. You are going to find these on any pc you audit. A service facsimile is the clue, the key to a pc's case. The route to succumb which he blindly asserts is his route to survival. And every pc has more than one of these. Fortunately, we have the tech to salvage him. We are the only ones who do. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:dr.gm  ****************************************************************** 31. HCOB 6 Sept 1978 II Service Facsimiles and Rock Slams HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978 Issue II Remimeo Level IV Checksheets Class IV Auditors Supervisors C/Ses SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS Refs: HCOB 5 Sept. 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE HCOB 1 Sept. 63 ROUTINE THREE SC HCOB 6 Sept. 78 III ROUTINE THREE SC-A FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS Tape: 6308C27 SH Spec 299 RIGHTNESS AND WRONGNESS Tape: 6309C04 SH Spec 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE Tape: 6309C03 SH Spec 302A R3SC Tape: 6309C05 SH Spec 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT Tape: 6309C18 SH Spec 308 ST. HILL SERVICE FAC HANDLING HCOB 3 Sept. 78 DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM HCOB 10 Aug. 76R R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN ---------- A service facsimile is a brother to R/Ses and evil intentions. This is easily seen when one understands the anatomy of the service fac and the right/wrong, dominate and survive computations that enter into it, and when one understands that an R/S always means a hidden, evil intention and that the total reason for an R/S is to make wrong. In order to get someone to succumb, they have to be wrong. Way back up there, the idea preceding the service fac was right, really right. Then it came down a bit and was a method of survival and then it was a method of dominating and then it was a method of being right in order to make others wrong. And in that contest one got enough overts so that the communication line took a switcheroo. What was right about it is now wrong about it and what was once wrong is now right. A=A=A enters into the situation where rightness becomes wrongness. All of his overts get piled up on one of these fixed ideas, or what we call a service facsimile. It isn't actually a facsimile at all. It's the guy himself keeping facsimiles in restimulation because he "knows" what's best. The person himself is generating the fixed idea; it is not the bank. It isn't what aberration the individual is dramatizing. It's what aberration does the individual dredge up in order to make somebody wrong. It isn't the accidental thing you think it is. It's intended. The intention is to be right and make others wrong, to dominate others and escape domination oneself, to aid own survival and hinder the survival of others. That is the service fac -- blood brother to the hidden, evil intention that is behind the rock slam. This does not mean you will necessarily see R/Ses on every service fac you run. It does mean that WHERE A PC IS R/Sing IN AN AREA YOU HAVE AN AREA OF A HEAVY -- A SEVERE -- SERVICE FAC. Know when you see an R/S that the individual is in the grip of an evil intention which he himself is generating. He intends that area or subject on which he is R/Sing nothing but harm. Calculatingly, covertly, he will go to great lengths to carry his intentions out, at all times carefully concealing the fact. The evil intention is not limited to terminals. He's not R/Sing on a terminal; he's R/Sing on the evil intention. The evil intention can associate with many terminals. The R/S dominates the individual; it is the person. He has been overwhelmed by it. In that area he has no ability to reason; he has no freedom to choose. The evil intention is substituted for livingness. It is his safe solution to life, his service facsimile. The service fac does not respond to ordinary auditing because in the course of ordinary auditing it does not get inspected. It, by its nature, forbids inspection. But when addressed at the right/wrong level, the pc gives it up easily because in that area he has no power of choice. MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC We have had, for many years, service fac processing with which to handle these obsessions, and thus to handle the person who R/Ses. But it is not just finding one service facsimile. You find many service facs which then add up to the big one. At Saint Hill in the mid-60s this was commonly associated with R/Ses. It was what the pc had done with the service fac to make others wrong which was important, not just finding it. Early on, the tech included auditing them out with Dianetics. And you found many, many more than one on each pc. We used to get complete character changes with this. The full tech on this has been submerged over the past several years. It is probably this omission of requiring several service facs to be run and then auditing them out with Dianetics that has resulted in so many R/Sers going on up undetected. As of this writing the full tech has been exhumed and we have now New Era Dianetics tech to help strip these packages down and take them apart at their basics. So we not only have a more thorough means of handling service facs than ever before, we also have a more reliable route to the handling of an R/Ser. BUT IT'S MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC. You may audit off one, two or three apparent service facsimiles that all answer up to the complete description of a service fac. And they will run. But all are actually leaning on the central service fac that is in restimulation in PT. As you take these lesser service facs off, the central one comes to view. On the first ones you find, the most you can hope for is you found something that blew the TA down and moved you closer to finding the main service fac. So you take them. If you've found a service fac, the needle will be looser and the TA in reasonable range. And it will run on the right/wrong, etc., brackets and the pc will get off automaticities. When you've finally found several and walked it all the way through to the service fac it's as if all the other service facs you've been peeling off are like the bands of trees and sod that lie up against the mountain peak. So you take the service facsimiles and run them as you find them. You unburden the cliffs before you pull the mountain out by the roots. As you're running out the first service facs, you're reversing the dwindling spiral, you're restoring the individual's ability to handle his environment because he's now seeing it, he's now beginning to confront it. And by the time you've pulled the main one -- the mountain -- out by its roots, you've returned him to sanity. He is now able to inspect; he no longer needs a "safe solution." It is the most dangerous thing in the world to have a safe solution, because that is the hole out of which sanity drains. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:mf.gm  ****************************************************************** 32. HCOB 6 Sept 1978 III Routine Three SC-A Full Service Facsimile Handling Updated with New Era Dianetics HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978 Issue III Remimeo Level IV Checksheets Class IV Auditors Supervisors C/Ses URGENT--IMPORTANT ROUTINE THREE SC-A FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS Refs: HCOB 22 July 63 YOU CAN BE RIGHT HCOB 1 Sept. 63 ROUTINE THREE SC HCOB 23 Aug. 66 SERVICE FACSIMILE HCOB 30 Nov. 66 ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES Tape: 6309C04 SH Spec 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE Tape: 6309C05 SH Spec 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT Tape: 6308C28 SH Spec 300 THE TA AND SERVICE FAC Tape: 6309C12 SH Spec 305 SERVICE FACS HCOB 26 June 78 II NED Series 6 ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS HCOB 18 June 78 NED Series 4 ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE ITEM HCOB 5 Sept. 78 ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE HCOB 6 Sept. 78 II SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS ---------- NOTE: Dianetic Clears may be run on service facs but only with any Dianetic steps deleted, as they are not to be run on Dianetics. ---------- We are into a new echelon of service facsimile running. At Saint Hill in the mid-60s many, many service facs were found on each pc and the earliest service fac running included the use of Dianetics. This was later omitted from service fac procedure and service facs were handled solely with Scientology tech by running off the automaticities on the computation to cognition, F/N and VGIs in the pc. Phenomenal gains and case changes were made on pcs with that tech alone -- all of them valid. That tech has been retained as a vital action to service fac handling. Now, with the advent of New Era Dianetics, service fac handling has been restored to its full technology. New Era Dianetics has opened the door to a more complete and finite handling of a service fac, with precision and exactness, than we have had heretofore. We no longer just find a service fac, audit off the automaticities, key it out and forget it. We audit it out fully and terminatedly, using New Era Dianetics to take it down to its basics and erase those. This in no way contradicts the fact that there were many pcs who, with a service fac found and the automaticities taken off, were able to actually then blow the service fac computation upon inspection. What it does make possible is the actual erasure of a service fac and its residuals on every pc, one for one. And not just one service facsimile per pc, but many. An auditor who has been trained on service fac running prior to this bulletin will need the tech he already has plus an excellent command of New Era Dianetics tech. If he has not done the New Era Dianetics Course, it will be required before attempting to run Routine 3SC-A. A Class IV Auditor who has already done the New Era Dianetics Course need only review it in order to be able to handle all the steps of the new, full service fac procedure. SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING REVISED BY STEPS Before you can run flows on a service facsimile, you must first find it. You want the pc's service facsimile. You don't find a service facsimile by listing for it on flows. You find the pc's service facsimile and run it on the flows. The sequence is you list for the pc's service fac, find it, run the automaticities off it; then you run the service fac itself on R3RA, engram running by chains. It is run to basic and full Dianetic end phenomena. You don't leave a service fac until you have taken it apart and blown it at its very roots. Then you list for another service fac, using a different listing question, and handle it fully. And another, and another. A pc can have many, many service facsimiles. You peel them off until you find the main service fac at the core of the case. And you handle that one fully, as you do the others, per the steps above. Needless to say, you are going to see some remarkable results. FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE PROCEDURE PRELIMINARY STEPS: 0a. Put in the R (reality) factor with the pc, telling him briefly what is going to be done in the session. 0b. Clear "computation" very thoroughly with the pc. Use the Tech Dictionary, HCOB 23 Aug. 66, SERVICE FACSIMILE, and any other reference you feel the pc may need. Have him demo it until you are certain he fully understands it. 0c. Clear the bracket commands (right/wrong, dominate, survival) first, using "Birds fly" as a sample service facsimile. Clearing the bracket commands is done at this point so you will be able to use these questions immediately when the service fac is found without putting stops on the pc's first rush of automaticities coming off. 0d. Then, clear the listing question. STEPS OF THE PROCEDURE: A. List and null for the pc's service fac, using the question: "In this lifetime, what do you use to make others wrong?" You want a BD F/N item that is a computation (not a doingness, beingness or havingness). When you get it, indicate the item. Then indicate the F/N. Then, despite the BD F/N, go on to the next step of the handling. B. Run the service fac found in (A) on the brackets: 1. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make you right? 2. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make others wrong? 3. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you escape domination? 4. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you to dominate others? 5. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) aid your survival? 6. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) hinder the survival of others? These are run as follows: Give the pc the first question, "In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make you right?" and let him run with it. He will have a rush of answers, answers coming too fast to be said easily, at this stage. Don't repeat the question unless the pc needs it. Just let him answer 1-1-1-1-1-1 (he may give you as many as 50 answers) until he comes to a cognition or runs out of answers or inadvertently answers question 2. Then switch to question 2: "In this lifetime how would (service fac) make others wrong?" Treat this the same way, i.e., let him answer 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2 until he cognites or runs out of answers or starts to answer question 1. Then switch back to question 1, same handling, back to question 2, same handling, as long as pc has answers coming easily. Upon cognition and F/N, acknowledge, indicate the F/N and end off on (1) and (2). Now give him question 3: "In this lifetime how would (service fac) help you escape domination?" and let it run by the same method as above. When this seems cooled off, use question 4: "In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you to dominate others?" Use questions 3 and 4 as above, as long as pc has answers coming easily. Upon cognition and F/N, acknowledge, indicate the F/N and go on to the next bracket. Using the same method as above, give him question 5: "In this lifetime, how would (service fac) aid your survival?" When he's run out on 5-5-5-5-5-5, switch to question 6: "In this lifetime, how would (service fac) hinder the survival of others?" Use questions 5 and 6 as above as long as pc has answers coming easily. Let him get off all the automaticities and come to a cognition and F/N. Acknowledge and indicate the F/N. At this point it is safe to end off on running the brackets. The idea is not to beat the process to death. The pc will have automaticities coming off thick and fast early in the run. These must be gone and the pc bright, F/Ning and VGIs when you end off. You are only trying to end the compulsive character of the service facsimile found and get it off automatic and get the pc to see it better at this stage, not to bleed the process of every bit of TA action. Running the service fac in the brackets will result in a major cognition, which could occur at any point during this running. When it does occur, it is the EP of this step of the service fac handling. End off and go onto the R3RA step. NOTE: In running a Dianetic Clear on service facs, you would end off running this service fac at this point, when the pc had reached a good cognition, F/N and VGIs. Do NOT run the Dianetic actions of service fac handling on a Dianetic Clear, as these pcs are not to be run on Dianetics. When you have completed one service fac on steps A and B, you can then list for another service fac and repeat the procedure. NOTE: If the service fac found on any pc did not run on the brackets, it would need to be prepchecked. See sections "When Running Off The Automaticity" and "When To Prepcheck" below. C. Run the service fac R3RA Quad, each flow to EP. It is not run narrative and it is not preassessed; otherwise full New Era Dianetics tech is used, per HCOB 26 June 78R II, NED Series 6, ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS. The service fac phrase itself is used as the running item. The commands for running a service fac on R3RA Quad Flows are FLOW 1: "Locate a time when you used (service fac)." (Example: "Locate a time when you used all horses sleep in beds.") FLOW 2: "Locate an incident of your causing another to use (service fac)." FLOW 3: "Locate an incident of others causing others to use (service fac)." FLOW 0: "Locate an incident of you causing yourself to use (service fac)." Take each flow down its chain of incidents to the basic and full Dianetic EP: F/N, postulate (postulate off = erasure) and VGIs. That will be the end of all vestiges of that service fac. D. List for another service fac on the pc, using the listing question: "In this lifetime, what do you use to dominate others?" When you have the service fac, repeat steps B and C above. E. Find another service fac on the pc with the listing question: "In this lifetime, what do you use to aid your own survival?" Handle the service fac per steps B and C above. F. Continue to find and handle service facs on the pc, using, in order, the following listing questions: 1. "In this lifetime, what do you use to make yourself right?" 2. "In this lifetime, what do you use to escape domination?" 3. "In this lifetime, what do you use to hinder the survival of others?" Further listing questions which can be used are given on HCOB 30 Nov. 66, ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES. You will need to find and handle several service facsimiles on the pc which will then add up to the big one. WHEN LISTING FOR THE SERVICE FACSIMILE You are listing for a BD F/N item. Write down each computation the pc gives you exactly as he states it, VERBATIM, with its read, no matter how improbable, non sequitur or inane it may sound. The service fac operates like a magnet as you're listing. You've given the pc the question and as the question is in the vicinity of the service fac you've already ticked it. It draws the pc's attention to it. He's listing along and suddenly he'll put a non sequitur item on the list. It doesn't make sense. It doesn't even answer the question, but there it is. Because his attention is being pulled to this inevitably. You're asking him for answers and he gives you the rightest answer he knows -- "People always jump off the Empire State Building." That's the solution. That solves everything. It blows the TA down. That's the service fac. Indicate the item to the pc; then indicate the F/N. You're now ready to run it in the brackets. WHEN RUNNING OFF THE AUTOMATICITY If you've found a service fac, the pc won't be able to stay out of it, I guarantee you. The first question is always how would it make him right. (Never how would it make him wrong. Never, never, never.) The automaticities should start with the first question. If not, ask him how it would make others wrong. You almost always enter it at the level of right/wrong. But don't make the blunder of thinking it can't be a service fac if it doesn't enter at that level. Try it on the other levels. It can enter at the level of dominate; it might enter at the level of survival. But if -- on one of those -- the pc doesn't immediately jump in and swim into the whirlpool, it's not it. If he tells you, "Well, let's see... make me right, no, hmmmm..." or "...escape domination... no, doesn't make sense," that's not it. If he says that isn't it, then that isn't it. Don't hang him with a wrong service fac because it's too easy to find a right one. They abound. If he hasn't jumped in and swum madly to the center of the whirlpool and gotten embroiled in this thing, it's not it. Because that's the first thing they want to do with a service fac -- drown. When you have the right one, you'll get the automaticities coming off thick and fast. Don't stop the avalanche with acknowledgments. Don't stop it with a new question. Let it run out. It's not one auditing question for one answer. It's one auditing question for one waterfall. WHEN TO PREPCHECK When the item found as a service fac won't run on any of the brackets, you prepcheck it to EP (F/N Cog VGIs). Ref: HCOB 14 Mar. 71R, F/N EVERYTHING. A rightness/wrongness computation doesn't surrender to normal auditing because it is a service fac. The pc has a vested interest in holding onto it. He won't be able to itsa it on a Prepcheck. Thus, a service fac, if present, will turn on mass on a Prepcheck. The Prepcheck is a series of types of decisions thetans make about things. So if it doesn't prepcheck, the Prepcheck must be in conflict with the rightness and wrongness. Reversely, if it's not a service fac, it will prepcheck, and you polish it off by that method to EP. Then go back to the list and find a service fac that will run. COMPLETING SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING WITH R3RA Even when the pc has gotten off the automaticities, has cognited and is comparatively free of the compulsive character of the service facsimile, there is more to be handled. Running the service fac using R3RA enables him to run out what he has done with it to make others wrong, etc. These will be the actual most-charged incidents in which he's used it, which will have accumulated in his wake as he went along substituting the service fac for himself and never inspecting the consequences. He will now be free to inspect those parts of the track as himself, and to inspect as well the effects of the service fac on the other flows. Finally, the use of R3RA, engram running by chains, enables him to fully erase the somatics and engram chains which have their roots in the service fac, or vice versa-as well as the postulates underlying them. ENDING SERVICE FAC RUNNING Service fac running can be ended off when you have fully run many service facs (which will lead to the main service fac). When the main service fac has been run to full EP, service fac handling is complete. NOTE: It might happen (rarely) that you get the main service fac on the pc on your first listing and nulling. It will be rare because the main one does not usually come to view until the others have been taken off. You run it, of course. Any service fac, run, produces change, but on this one you will see the pc changing character before your eyes. The results are quite astounding. But realize that he does have other, lesser service facs which do not simply dissolve because the main core service fac is now gone, even though they have been leaning upon it. You will need to L&N for these and completely clean the pc of service facs. The main core service facsimile will be the one the pc has used as a solution to all of life. When found and run, it will be unmistakable to both the pc and the auditor. When this one has been completed on all the steps above, as well as the lesser service facs surrounding it, you will have attained the EP on service fac running. You will have brought about a complete character change in the individual, returned his freedom of choice and his freedom to inspect and enabled him to be truly right. And that is the stuff of which sanity is made. This level is actually the sanity level. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:dr.gm