Subject: FZ BIBLE 2/3 SHSBC-392 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY
Date: 2 Jul 1998 22:43:14 -0000
From: Secret Squirrel <anon@squirrel.owl.de>
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST (TAPE TRANSCRIPT)

SHSBC-392 14 JUL 64 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY (confidential) 2/3

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet
are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any
Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************

SHSBC-392 14 JUL 64 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY (confidential) Part 2

This tape is omitted from the SHSBC cassettes.

Transcript of Taped Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard
ShSpec 29  -   6407 C 14
(Renumbered SHSBC - 392)
July 14, 1964

 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY

(continued from part 1)

Truth must be truth. It must be all the way truth. Now,
anybody who is studying slowly, and so forth, gets caught
up in this factor: That you can't go part way to truth.
The most suicidal activity that you can engage upon, is to
go part way to the truth. You've got to go all the way to the
truth. There are no half truths. About the most dangerous
thing you can have anything to do with is a half truth.
There are.. people have understood this, that a little
knowledge is dangerous. Well, that's actually not very well
applied, that's not even very well stated, and it certainly
isn't the same sense of what I'm saying here. No truth can
be half way approached. If you got that far and didn't go
any further, you would fall flat on your face and be in
quite a mess. If you set out to shoot the moon, there is
nothing sillier than going into perihelion around it for
the rest of your life (chuckle). You've got to land on the
moon. There is no substitute for totality with regard to
truth. In other words, you've got to know all of it.

And this is ... this I'm trying to field a philosophy. The
Bugdeammerbum.. the famous witch doctor from lower
Scrambula, he puts his foot on this line and he says,
"There really is no time" and he doesn't go any further
than that. He teaches everybody, there really is no time.
He's put himself and everybody around him with one foot on
the banana peel and the other in the grave, see. He hasn't
told them why there is no time, see. He hasn't told them
anything, and all he'll do is ... everybody goes around
saying, well there is no time, so it doesn't matter, but
yet, echoing in around in their skull is the fact that it's
true, there is no time. That is a truth, but it is so
little of the truth. Without somebody going the whole way,
it actually becomes quite dangerous. The whole race would
then simply go in apathy and that would be the end of it.

And that is what has happened in almost all philosophies
that I have ever heard of. See, they get some corner of
some truth and then they don't walk down that road and they
go no further than this. You see? And they sit around on
mountain tops regarding their navels and they do weird odd
ball things, and they wonder why they're not getting any
better if they know so much. Well, the reason they're not
getting any better, even though they know so much, is
because they started on the road to truth and they never
made the passage and they're something like a ship-wrecked
ship. They're high and dry on that reef and they're never
gonna go any further. But having gone that distance, it
wrecked them. Now this in itself is soul chilling.

This pronounces something quite interesting to you. You
can say, well we started into Scientology. Yeah, you
started on a road toward truth, didn't you? The only fatal
thing you can do, if you know this about your pcs, and you
know it about those around you, and you know it about some
of them fallen by the wayside, you instinctively feel it.

Having started, ceasing to go is one of the most fatal
things they could do. Now you look at this with some
sadness because it's actually a very fatal action. But let
me call to your attention something else. It isn't that
Scientology got you started on the road to truth. You
started on the road long time before. You've been on that
road ... When you sat down in the amphitheater, when you sat
down in the amphitheater in Greece and listened to somebody
saying philosophically, yippity yappishly, that something
is the end of the road and Kronos actually devours his own
children and therefore the whole universe is circular and
whatever else is being said. You started on the road to
truth and you can speculate along this particular direction:
what is the truth in this matter? What is the true composition
of this universe? What is my true identity? Who am I?
What do I consist of? Where do I come from?  Of course,
nearly everybody has asked that question of himself since
he's a little child. You started on the road to truth.
That's dangerous, unless you walk the whole road.

That road's got to be walked because the character of the
GPMs themselves admit of no halfway measures. You key in
of one of these GPMs, and you key in a series of GPMs, you
get them all roiled up and then you don't do anything about
them, you're in the soup.  They contain the end all of all
explanations. Contained in the GPMs are the explanation of
the universe in which we live. Their identity, everything
everything is composed of. The impetus. All of these very
things.

In other words, the philosopher busy philosophizing and
having himself a ball on the subject and coming up to some
conclusion. Let's take Einstein. Einstein was walking on
this road. He had finally gotten up to a point where he
was trying to integrate life into his other equations and
he was groping, groping, groping and he left one of the
most remarkable, he left one of the most thoroughly
remarkable messes for ages forward to figure out that you
ever cared to have anything to do with. When he died he
had a bunch of consultations. In other words, he was going
towards the everything of everything. In other words, he
was going towards something that explains everything, and
he hadn't arrived any closer than a bunch of symbols.
Having figured out his various equivalents of constants,
and speeds of light, matter, energy, space, and time,
having figured these out, he was trying to squeeze life
into this somehow or other, and he left an awful hodge
podge of figures which everybody worships back where he
was, Princeton I think it was... And they're busy trying
to do something with this now and it's all very complex
and it's all very something or other. In fact, everybody
around there is half way spinning, what the devil were these
last equations that Einstein wrote. He was just trying to
integrate life with the universe. That's, everybody would
say, an over simplification. No, it isn't, that's a more
truthful statement. That's closer to the truth than they
are. He was just trying to integrate life and the universe
and that and that. That's all.

The old Encyclopedia Britannica says in order to understand
space and time, you had better understand the mind because
it's very often, very possible, that space and time are
simply generated by the mind, how do we know. Interesting.
That's in the 1890 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica.
Marvelous insight. Very well put. I noticed it hasn't
been followed by anybody else. You notice that science
today says the mind is so in error, it is so inaccurate, is
so this, that it is just nothing in mechanics at all, but
mass is all and the mind is nothing, see. The universe is
everything, and the material things in existence are this
and then he is just a spontaneous combustion from mud, and
this is all he is, and he's just a lousy bum, and you talk
to one of these boys and their whole orientation is in this
direction. He will say, "Oh a computer, oh well a computer
never makes a mistake.  This is the run, it puts out all
these marvelous things, look at these marvelous things.
Human mind, agh, human being agh .... (muttering). Yeah,
listen to these boys. I've tried once in a while, timidly
for me, to say, "Who feeds the data to this computer?",
"What feeds the data to this computer, and get an answer
out of it and who inspects that answer after it has been
printed but the mind, the being, the person, the
individual." Yagh-yagh-yagh, they can't get this point at
all, see. In other words they've got now, the cake is more
important than the baker, see. You've got an end-all cake
that's self-generated and sprang spontaneously from the
cook pot, but no baker. The cake is greater than the
baker. Don't you see?

So, in studying R-6, the first thing we have to recognize
with vividness, is that we're dealing with the baker, not
the cake. We're dealing with the thing that makes it, not
the thing that is made. We've got to recognize that, and
that'll explain a great many failures auditors have when
they begin to approach R-6 and it's auditing techniques.
They pay all their attention to the mass, the GPM, the
significance, and to hell with the pc. Well in actual
fact, if you don't pay attention to the pc and his reaction
by keeping in a good auditing comm cycle, by doing good ARC
break assessments when you got by-passed charge, by first
and foremost taking care of the pc, by making absolutely
certain the pc doesn't have any PTPs at the time he's being
audited, making sure of all these little points, keeping
that pc in good communication, handling that very nicely,
making sure that all the items read, the pc is satisfied
that they have read, that the pc is cheerful and happy
about this, then you've just got an end-all cake, and you
got no baker. And it's the baker you're trying to handle
and it's the baker you'll be left with after the cake has
been et. So, you take good care of the baker. So a few
pieces of cake get chipped up. Well that's not very
important as long as you take care of the baker.

An individual is an individual and now you find this
inherent in early Scientology teachings where it was taught
more instinctively than factually, you see. It was taught
more on a basis of general knowingness. I knew how these
things were. You'll find that the being, the individual,
had generated the universe and part of that universe is the
GPM, and the GPM in it's generation then restrained him and
compelled him to covertly go on making the rest of the
universe unbeknownst to himself, and compelled him by his
own generation to go on making it, the GPM, see. So you're
not quite sure when you first look at this thing which way
is which. Is the cart drawing the horse or the horse
drawing the cart, you know. When you first look at it you
will say, "Wow - science, modern science has said, well,
it's all cake, and there's no baker", see.

Well let's take it up a little bit further. The first
trouble you're going to have and that is, is the course ...
is, is, is the cart being drawn by the horse or is the
horse being drawn by the cart, or who is running what, and
as the pc begins to look at this he actually can accept
intellectually, he's making this thing that is smacking his
face in but he can't put any part of it into actual
subjective reality. So it's a point you don't force down
his throat. It will eventually begin to dawn on him. He
gets to be further and further on a gradient of cause over
the GPM in spite of the fact that cause itself is an
end-Word.

The point is here, he gets to be, actually, more and more
cause over this GPM. See, everytime you're falling across a
real significant significance or something that is
absolutely necessary to do anything about anything with
you're also colliding, madly, with GPMs. You understand?
You're colliding with the meaningness of a GPM in some way,
shape, or form, in any human action, and in any part of or
action about this universe. It really doesn't matter much
what corner you approach of livingness or life in view of
the fact that livingness and life is created by the
individual through the GPM.

He creates the GPM and it creates it, but he's long since
forgotten he created the GPM. "It looks to me like"...,
you see, he would say, "it looks to me like the cake, you
know, is creatin' the rest of the kitchen." (chuckle) Why,
he will then not be able to very intelligently grasp the
fact that every time he tries to address any corner of
existence, he starts to feel strange or peculiar. Well
naturally, any corner of existence is already capped with a
GPM because if it wasn't, it wouldn't be there.

So, all of a sudden a guy is just thinking a thought, see,
thinking a thought at random. Alright, that is either a
lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an End-Word, see. One or
the other. It's a lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an
End-Word. That's it. I don't care what thought you just
thought, if you thought any at all, So you mustn't get
into some weird, you mustn't get into some weird odd-ball
contest of trying not to think in some way, in such a way
as not to restimulate a GPM. That doesn't happen to be
possible.

There's no particular reason for you ... I already went
over this rolley-coaster here a few weeks ago, it was a
relatively short time ago, I had to decide what this was
all about and I had to get down and work it all out very
carefully, and I did, you see, and that's the conclusion I
came to: That he built a universe through the formation of
a GPM and he couldn't think any thought to amount to
anything. But didn't amount to anything, he couldn't think
any thought that could impinge on one, one way or the
other. I made an actual test. It wasn't intentional.
It's with causation. I was telling you about cause level
and I had this struggle about trying to form a
communication about cause level, and I said, "Well I
don't ... " I knew that cause and so on, was an End-Word
in a GPM. We'll get on to what End Words are, and so forth,
in just a moment.

Well, I knew that it was an End Word and therefore I tried
to get around it by saying causation. Erase the causation
of a pc. And I tried to get around it also by using
causativeness, to increase the causativeness of a being.
And by the time I'd carefully written the bulletin, which
you have, carefully scouting this on causation and
causativeness, I was sick as a pup. It wasn't that I was
restraining anything, or anything, I was simply mis-wording
an End-Word. So I went back, I went back and scrubbed all
that and simply put cause down there well knowing that it
was an End-Word.

You don't want to keep repeating an End-Word at somebody
when you're giving them auditing commands. You can get out
to an outer perimeter lock. And that's what you want to
keep repeating, like "done". Well, that's very nice - done,
done, that's good. "What have you done?". That's good.
Withhold - no, that's a Root-Word because every time you
say withhold you're going to key-in directly and
immediately some other portion. You're gonna key-in
somebody faster than you're easing him up. Don't you see?
So, it's best in an auditing command to use an indirect
action. But in the discussion of communication of
anything, if you try to escape the significance of an
End-Word or the significance of a Root-Word, if you try to
escape these things and not mention them, all you do is
suppress them and the final result is, is you're
practically around the bend. So, the best answer is, the
hell with it. Say 'em. Do them. Not with a repetitive
auditing command. Not in a constant hammer pound of an
auditing command.

But a careful review shows that you can't escape this
particular thing and it shows, that when you're trying to
be technical, that a departure from the exact statement is
liable to make you sicker than an approach to the exact
statement. Then that says where you sit and where you
think. Now the number of Root-Words and End-Words which
you hear battered about every day, laid end to end, would
be longer than the Queen Elizabeth's passage from New York
to London. Every cocktail party on there, all they do is
bat about large numbers of Root-Words and End-Words.

Now, the worse off a person is, in actual fact, the more he
will talk in Root-Words and End-Words. Sanity, if it is
anything at all, would be the gradient scale of
destimulated Root-Words and End-Words, and insanity, would
be the command value of the Root-Words and End-Words over
the individual. Not their restimulation, but their command
value - that would be insanity. If Root-Words and
End-Words have a disproportionate command value over the
individual, you can say he's insane. Now that's ... That's
interesting too because insane, of course, is an End-Word.
But you have to step outside the basic considerations.

But quite in addition to adding both the universe and
personalities and reactions and so forth, the individual is
still quite capable of independent thought. And the reason
you have Dianetics and Scientology is totally attributable
to the fact that I've been walking, to a very marked
degree, outside the perimeter of reactive thought while
considering these various things. Now that's very
interesting. We got some place, you see, and didn't get
detoured into it even though we were dealing with and very
often using it.

Now take the very step with which you work - ARC. Affinity
is an End-Word - Reality is an End-Word - Communication is
an End-Word. There are three End-Words in a row, all the
way down early on the track and, theoretically, it should
make everybody sick as pups because it's so early. You
know, you destimulate the charge of them. Now, you're
living right in the middle of the fourth lightning if you
live in this universe and you're actually further from it
in Scientology than you are if you were out digging a ditch
somewhere because, believe me, that foreman when he comes
down the line is going to speak nothing but Root-Words and
End-Words. He's going to be pretty batty on the subject.

This little jazz musician, "Is that something!" "Boy
that's nowhere!" All in expletives. But they're ... you
get the idea? There's a vast difference here. They're
dead on dramatizing. They're completely unwitting. It
would be quite another thing for you, a Scientologist, to
be dead on wittingly. I know when I'm using Root Words and
when I'm using End Words to a very, very marked degree. If
I hadn't been aware of one before, if I ponder one too
hard, I'll get warm. When I notice that I'm getting rather
warm, I say, "Well what do you know, I wonder if that's a
Root Word, I wonder if that's an End-Word?" "Alright, it's
a Root Word. What do you know, must be a Root-Word
because it wouldn't add up any other way."

I found out that the resistance to and the flinch from
these things is what does the damage, not the use. That's
a very subtle point for you to know in Class VI. Very
subtile, so get that point down very well. It's the flinch
from, you see. It's the suppression of; it causes you to
feel dizzy and woggy and sick at your stomach. And
invalidation of, is what causes pain. Invalidation, of
course too, is an End-Word, but that causes pain. If you
want to make somebody hurt like crazy just get him to get
down, and say that it isn't true that there is a goal of
something or other, something or other, which is a real
goal, you see; or say it isn't true there is such an End
Word, and he's getting real excited about it, and the next
confounded thing you know, he'll feel like he's being sawed
up by a butcher's powered beef saw. What happened? Well,
the liabilities then are the liabilities of contest with
and dramatization of.

Contest with, is your greatest liability as a student.
Even though you're afraid of something you're still in
contest with it. It is that, and you are you. Afraid to
do these things. Walking the chalk line about them. Being
careful in consideration of them and those sort of things.
Well that's, that's where the damage comes. Then you say,
"Oh brother that's nowhere, that's really nowhere", you
know. "That's no..... I wonder what the hell I'm thinking
nowhere for, you know, what's all this nowhere. Tah, must
be an End Word. Ah, it's nowhere". You know, get the, get
the delicate shift here, see.

Alright, so you're gonna keep saying nowhere and make
yourself sick at the stomach and so forth and restimulate
the End-word "nowhere". Alright, that isn't going to worry
you until you suddenly realize you are saying "nowhere" and
to that degree dramatizing the thing, and then say you
mustn't because it is an End-Word. Now, you get that
subtle one? Because that's where you go over Niagara Falls
in a barrel. It's right at that point, see. You say,
"Well, I shouldn't be saying that because ...". Don't you
see?

Now, I've taken a new look at all this. So, you find out
after a conversation with somebody or other that you're
absolutely reeling. You've been talking about these things
and the room goes out of plumb, and so forth. So it does.
So what? Now, you really want to make it go out of plumb?
"Well I mustn't really discuss this anymore". Well, you've
knocked it all out of plumb with your locks. You see that?

Now, you find yourself dramatizing these things every once
in a while but it's only a sin not to eventually catch
yourself. I don't expect you not to dramatize them.
They're only still here, so you're dramatizing something
about space and matter, that's for sure, and time is
passing, so you must be dramatizing collectively, something
about time.

Alright! Well, let's figure this little other tiny nuance.
You all of a sudden find that you're sitting there saying,
"Tsk, problems, problems, problems, problems, now wait a
minute, I must have an End Word or something in
restimulation", see. Even though it's next week before you
find that out, see, and then not make the mistake of
saying, "Well, I mustn't say problems any more to myself",
see. Because the recognition of it is enough. You don't
have to prevent the future, because that's an End-Word too.
(laugh) So the gist of the situation is that you're
surrounded with these things and all you've done to date,
until you collide with them in study, is simply dramatize
them.

Now what's happening to you is you're finding out what
you've been dramatizing. Your face, every once in a while,
will be rather red on this subject. I, myself, pushed
myself away from an auditing session. Just very mildly
pushed myself from an auditing session and walked around
the room for a little while once, and I came back and I sat
down and I went over ... there wasn't anything wrong. I
was getting reads, everything was just fine. And I went
over everything under the sun, moon, and stars that I could
go over, and tried to compare everything that I had done
and everything I hadn't done and I was looking for this and
that and all of a sudden it occurred to me, I wonder what
I'm trying to do here. Why am I reviewing everything that
has happened here, you see. And then it suddenly struck me
that the next goal up that I was about to run was "To create
problems". I had simply been sitting there fearing
problems. I laughed at myself and ran the next pair. That
was the next one coming up. And I was - I was creating
problems - LIKE MAD. (laughing) You know what I mean?
You can't actually expect not to do it. If you didn't do
it, you wouldn't be part of the universe. Don't you see?

Your advance, is to some degree measured by your
recognition of what you, yourself, are doing. And a real
recognition comes about when you realize that you're making
these things up and of course about that time they will
cease to. Now there's a trap in all this of the tremendous
quantitativeness of them. There appear to be so many that
you become exhausted. The figures on this are variable.
There's a slight variation in these figures but the best
figures I have is 268 Roots and 268 End-Words. That makes
it square. There are 18 RIs in a GPM - proper line plot -
268 Root-Words in one series and 268 End-Words, or 268
serieses. Now if you multiply this one times the other,
you'll find then, there are in excess of 23,000 GPMs.

Now that, of course, is so staggering, there's such an
astonishing number that it makes you feel rather quivery on
a subject of, "I've got to audit all these out and it's
taking us a session, or in some cases it's taking us two
sessions to run out a GPM, and we're doing turn about type
auditing and I actually am only getting three sessions a
week and I'm running one and one half GPMs a week and there
are 23,000 of them to run out. So I can expect to be OT,
of course, at the end of, something on the order of 33,000
weeks, or something like this. And 33,000 weeks divided by
52 gives you the nu.... Oh my God!"

Well, of course, it's not the way it goes. This would be
good pedantic mathematics but it doesn't happen to be an
accurate situation. Once you've got your plot well oiled
in, you're spending less and less time in trying to find
your way down the bank. Don't you see? Once you've got
.. ninety percent of this work, by the way .. well I'm not
quite ... yes, I'd say ninety percent of the work has been
done on the organization of this. The consecutive adjacent
Goals and the consecutive adjacent End-Words are, are still
in a state of polish. They're mostly known, don't you see,
but they could be wiggled or wobbled to be here or be
there, or be something of the sort, don't you see, but the
trick was to get the pattern. Of course, the biggest trick
was to find out it was there at all. But to get the
pattern of this thing took me over a year and a half of
some of the wildest most troublesome stuff I have ever been
through. Very gruesome.

I look now on an auditor who can't find a few synonyms.
He's got one, he's got one to spit, you know. He can't
find the next goal which is to expectorate. I rather look
at this as being rather poor because the next goal to spit
is to, of course, - this is not a proper Root-Word - the
next goal to spit would of course be to expectorate, see.
It's to spit cats, the next goal is to expectorate cats,
you see, and the next goal to it would be to spitee cats.
Very imaginative. You've got "to run" is next to "to gallop",
you see. To travel fast, to speed. They're just all tied
together, the same word. Same word, and it's got to be
checked out and the best thing to do this with is one of
these New Rodell Word Finders. They're only available in
the United States and they're very, very fancy. They've
had a lot of college professors working on the thing and
they were nicely keyed-in and they practically laid the
bank out in this thing unwittingly and unknowingly and you
look up a list of synonyms, brother it will find the next
door cousin in most of the cases.

(continued in part 3)