Date: 8 Jun 1999 04:57:26 -0000 Subject: FZBA 12/14 SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology Message-ID: <681c7fbe037ea97f2d934cc8011f71ae@anonymous.poster> Sender: Secret Squirrel Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to . The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable. From: Secret Squirrel Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net Lines: 1844 Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!remarQ-easT!supernews.com!remarQ.com!nntp.abs.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!kiowa!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:749195 alt.clearing.technology:84691 FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH VOLUME SUPER TECH VOL FOR 1963 - PART 12 ************************************************** The Freezone Tech Volumes are a superset of: 1. The Old Tech Volumes 2. The New Tech Volumes 3. Confidential Material 4. BTBs 5. PLs from the OEC volumes concerning Tech 6. Anything else appropriate that we can find They do not include a. All HCOPLs (see the OEC volumes for those) b. Tape Transcripts (which are being posted separately) Because there is so much material (for 1963, we have twice as much material as the old tech volumes), and because the old and new Tech Volumes do not align as to how the years are divided between the volumes, we are doing each year as a separate volume. The contents will be posted separately as part 0 and repeated in part 1 but will not be included in the remaining parts to keep the size down. ************************************************** STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews, the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** 145 HCOB 9 SEP 63 REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS AND REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING (TV5 p. 361-62, NTV VII p. 299-301) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 9 SEPTEMBER AD13 Central Orgs Franchise REPETITIVE RUDIMENTS AND REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING (Compiled from HCO Bulletins of July 2, 3 and 4, AD12) HOW TO GET THE RUDIMENTS IN Just as an E-Meter can go dead for the auditor in the presence of a monstrous ARC break, I have found it can go gradiently dull in the presence of out rudiments. If you fail to get one IN then the outness of the next one reads faintly. And if your TR1 is at all poor, you'll miss the rudiment's outness and there goes your session. To get over these difficulties, I've developed Repetitive Rudiments. The auditor at first does not consult the meter, but asks the rudiments question of the pc until the pc says there is no further answer. At this point the auditor says, "I will check that on the meter." And asks the question again. If it reads, the auditor uses the meter to steer the pc to the answer, and when the pc finds the answer, the auditor again says, "I will check that on the meter" and does so. The cycle is repeated over and over until the meter is clean of any instant read (see HCO Bulletin of May 25, 1962, for Instant Read). The cycle: 1. Run the rudiment as a repetitive process until pc has no answer. 2. Consult meter for a hidden answer. 3. If meter reads use it to steer ("that" "that" each time the meter flicks) the pc to the answer. 4. Stay with the Meter and do (2) and (3). The process is flat when there is no instant read to the question. One does not "bridge out" or use "two more commands". When the meter test of the question gets no instant read, the auditor says, "The meter is clean". The trick here is the definition of "With Session". If the pc is With Session the meter will read. If the pc is partially against session the meter will read poorly, and the rudiment will not register and the rudiment will get missed. But with the pc with session the meter will read well for the auditor. FAST CHECKING A Fast Check on the Rudiments consists only of Steps (2) and (3) of the cycle done over and over. Watching the meter the auditor asks the question, takes up only what reads and, careful not to Q and A, clears it. One does this as many times as is necessary to get a clean needle. But one still says "The meter is clean" and catches up the disagreement by getting the additional answers. When the question is seen to be clean, the question is left. In using Fast Checking NEVER SAY, "THAT STILL READS." That's a flunk. Say, "There's another read here." REPETITIVE PREPCHECKING We will still use the term "Prepchecking" and do all Prepchecking by repetitive command. STEP ONE Without now looking at the Meter, the auditor asks the question repetitively until the preclear says that's all, there are no more answers. STEP TWO The auditor then says, "I will check that on the meter" and does so, watching for the Instant Read (HCO Bulletin May 25, 1962). If it reads, the auditor says, "That reads. What was it?" (and steers the pc's attention by calling each identical read that then occurs). "There ....... That ....... That ....... " until the pc spots it in his bank and gives the datum. STEP THREE The auditor then ignores the meter and repeats Step One above. Then goes to Step Two, etc. STEP FOUR When there is no read on Step Two above, the auditor says, "The meter is clean." This is all there is to Repetitive Prepchecking as a system. Anything added in the way of more auditor questions is destructive to the session. Be sure not to Q and A (HCO Bulletin of May 24, 1962). Be sure your TR4 is excellent in that you understand (really, no fake) what the pc is saying and acknowledge it (really, so the pc gets it) and return the pc to session. Nothing is quite as destructive to this type of auditing as bad TR4. END WORDS The E-Meter has two holes in it. It does not operate on an ARC broken pc and it can operate on the last word (thought minor) only of a question. Whereas the question (thought major) is actually null. A pc can be checked on the END WORDS OF RUDIMENTS QUESTIONS and the charge on those single words can be made known and the question turned around to avoid the last word's charge. Example: "Are you willing to talk to me about your difficulties?" The word "difficulties", said to the pc by itself gives an Instant Read. Remedy: Test "Difficulties". If it reads as itself then change the question to: "Concerning your difficulties, are you willing to talk to me?" This will only react when the pc is unwilling to do so. Caution: This trouble of END WORDS reading by themselves occurs mainly in the presence of weak TR1 and failure to groove in the question to a "thought major". With good TR1 the END WORDS read only when the question is asked. IN PRACTICE you only investigate this when the pc insists strongly that the question is nul. Then test the end word for lone reaction and turn the question about to make it end with another end word (question not to have words changed, only shifted in order). Then groove it in and test it for Instant Read. If it still reacts as a question (thought major) then, of course, it is not nul and should be answered. DOUBLE CLEANING "Cleaning" a rudiment that has already registered nul gives the pc a Missed Withhold of nothingness. His nothingness was not accepted. The pc has no answer. A missed no-answer then occurs. This is quite serious. Once you see a Rudiment is clean, let it go. To ask again something already nul is to leave the pc baffled - he has a missed withhold which is a nothingness. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.bp.cden Copyright $c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 146 BTB 12 SEP 63 CCH'S DATA [Not in either set of tech volumes. This was originally an HCOB and was later reissued as a BTB. We do not have the original HCOB version, but this BTB should be close. It is from a Level D SHSBC pack circa 1980. Note that it has been REVISED rather than simply re-issued. If someone has an older unrevised version, please post it. - Ed.] BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 12 SEPTEMBER 1963R REVISED & REISSUED 7 SEPTEMBER 1974 AS BTB (REVISION IN SCRIPT) CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1963 SAME TITLE Remimeo CCH'S DATA The CCHs are a highly workable set of Processes starting with Control, going to Communication and leading to Havingness, in that order. The CCHs are auditing specifically aimed at and using all the parts of the Two Way Comm Formula. CONTROL is the first action of the CCHs and is highlighted by being done Tone 40 for the first two CCHs (CCH 1 and CCH 2). The reason for Control being the main point is simply to bring about an awareness of Terminals to which communication will be possible; this is done by A. bringing to the PC's awareness that his body and he are being controlled from a particular KNOWN SOURCE POINT and B. that he also is a Source Point of Control with Control over self and body, all of which is accomplished with CCH 1. i.e. Awareness of two known terminals: Once the above has been done with CCH 1, the gains can be developed further with CCH 2 by finding for the PC more known points (environment) and familiarity in this "new" environment plus the beginnings of the next major step forward in this developement of Communication, the awareness of distance. COMMUNICATION (CCH3) is the next major step forward in the rehabilitation of your PC. Tone 40 is used in the next step but only on the motion. Communication is encouraged. The type of Communication practised by the actual auditing actions is that of "one way communication" i.e.Cause-distance-effect with intention, attention, duplication and understanding, plus the first glimmerings of cause being given to the PC by Auditor receiving PC's comm and then getting the PC to get the idea of contributing to the motion. In this section you are also going to develop the PC's ability to reach by showing him it is safe to reach across a distance (hand contact mimicry) and then reduce his dependency on YES? and increase his reach even more (hand space mimicry). As an added bonus to the above you are also on the beginning step of Havingness (Duplication) as you will be teaching the person to duplicate as a being in two way communication and not as a body with reference to body Right and body Left. HAVINGNESS is the final step in this portion of the CCH formula (full formula CCHCACTCH where A = attention (control) T = Thinkingness (control)). This step of CCH 4 is the final culmination point which restores the PC's ability to be in good two way communication with a high level of Havingness. By the use of Duplication, the full Two Way Communication Formula is practised in a physical manner with the result that you will have travelled a very very steep case gain from No Comm as a Thetan to full Two Way Communication as a Thetan with lots of Havingness. i.e. The emanation of an impulse or particle (Book and Motion) from Source Point across a distance to Receipt Point with the intention of bringing about at Receipt Point a Duplication and understanding of that which emanated from the Source Point, with Receipt Point then becoming the Source Point back across the distance to the Source Point which has now become the Receipt Point with intention, attention, duplication and understanding. OBSERVED GENERAL ERRORS 1. Not knowing how to change from Hand Contact Mimicry to Hand Space Mimicry. ANS. The change occurs on the run through the CCHs after Hand Contact Mimicry is flat with no change, i.e. CCH 1, 2, 3 (HCM with change), 4,1,2,3 (HCM with change) 4, 2, 1, 2, 3 (HCM 5 commands only, no change), 4, 1, 2, 3 (Hand Space Mimicry). 2. Trying to handle "verbal originations" on Tone 40 CCH 1 and 2. ANS. Tone 40 is used to overcome revolt of circuits, Body Originations are handled, circuits are not validated. 3. Overwhelming PC with very slow, very fast or continuously varying speeds of movements. ANS. An overwhelm is always wrong. Velocity plays an important role in being part of the Comm Formula. By all means experiment with it but pay close attention to PC, make for wins and increase tolerance, not losses and decrease tolerance. 4. Interrupting PC to handle a Body Origination. ANS. Body Originations must be picked up when they occurs. In deciding to pick up a Body Origination the Auditor should bear in mind that it is against the Auditor's Code to prevent a PC from carrying out a command. 5. While doing CCH 4 Auditor tells PC to do it Mirror-image-wise. ANS. When the process is being done as per the Two Way Communication Formula you will see that the PC will be executing the command "mirror-image-wise" (the receipt point has become the source point). However, to tell the PC to do it mirror-image-wise is absolutely wrong as such a direction will prevent the PC from looking and put him on a self-audit. 6. Not being sure of a CCH flat point. ANS. Flat Point = 3 cycles with no change in Comm Lag, no physically observed change and the PC doing it. 7. Imprecise Body movements of Auditor on CCH 2. ANS. Auditor on right side of PC (PC on Auditor's left) with Auditor slightly in front of PC except on "Turn around". The change of position is achieved by moving the left leg one paoe to the left and forward in each case. H. G. Parkhouse Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:SW:AL:MH:HP:mh Copyright c 1963, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [The revisions in script consist of the words "and understanding" being added after the word "duplication" in two places in the paragraph beginning with "HAVINGNESS is the"] ================== 148 HCOPL 18 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY FIVE SCIENTOLOGY INSTRUCTORS (CANC PER OEC) (OEC V4 p 165) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Central Orgs Academies HCO POLICY LETTER OF 18 SEPTEMBER AD 13 SCIENTOLOGY FIVE SCIENTOLOGY INSTRUCTORS The following is a guide to Scientology Instructors: 1. Scientology is a heuristic science. 2. The data has been discovered and assembled by L. Ron Hubbard. 3. The data has been amply covered and explained by L.R.H. in lectures and bulletins and books. 4. Training Drills have been devised and/or approved by L.R.H. and are more than adequate. 5. Auditing Routines, Processes and Procedures have also been prepared by L.R.H. and they are fully comprehensive and up-to-date. The curriculum for any course has been carefully designed and/or approved by L.R.H. It should therefore be apparent that it is unnecessary for an instructor to explain data, training drills or procedures either in long individual talks or in 'lectures' to groups of students. The job of an instructor is restricted to and his efforts should be concentrated on checking to see that a student knows his data, can do his TRs and can follow auditing procedure. This is done by testing and observation. If a student flunks a test he is directed to study and/or practise the material some more. If instructor finds from observation that student does not know his data or is not practising it correctly then the student is directed to study and/or practise accordingly. An instructor is not a coach. Within the foregoing is the student who asks questions. This shows he does not know his data or training drill. The answer to the student's question is contained in the published data so all an instructor has to do is to refer the student to the book chapter, bulletin or tape that contains the data. Instructor should avoid giving direct answers for at least two reasons. 1. To encourage student to find out for himself. 2. To obviate the possibility of an instructor giving his interpretation of data which may be an alter-is of the correct data. Instructors should set a good example to students by handling them with good ARC. Emphasis should be put on the following. Tell student "You can do it". Don't tell them they have done wrong but point out that they haven't properly understood the data and direct them to the data they haven't understood. When a student has done a good job or is making good progress, tell him. Don't give a student continuous losses, try to find something, however small, that he has done right and point this out to him. At all times an instructor should present an unruffled demeanour and a clean and tidy appearance. An instructor maintains 8C with ARC not with the overbearing discipline of a sergeant-major. He calls the roll, directs students where to go and arranges schedules. He infracts infringement of course rules and students' failure to follow instructions. Students who are constantly failing in their studies are missing out somewhere in their basic data so they need to be directed to study basic material. Remember that you are training auditors, one day you may need one of them to audit you so make sure they know their data and can use it. Written & Issued by: Reg Sharpe Course Secretary, SHSBC for L. RON HUBBARD Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Cancelled by HCO P/L 27 October 1970 Issue II, The Course Supervisor, in the OEC 1970 Year Book.] ================== 149 HCOB 22 SEP 63 SCIENTOLOGY TWO PREPCHECK BUTTONS (TV5 p. 363-4, Not in New tech vols) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER AD13 (CANCELLED - see HCO B 14 Aug 64 Old Volume V p. 446) Central Orgs Franchise SCIENTOLOGY TWO PREPCHECK BUTTONS (Cancels HCO Tech Ltr of Oct 1, AD12) The following order and number of Prepcheck Buttons should be used wherever "an 18 button Prepcheck" is recommended. Do not use the old order of buttons, not because of any danger, but these below are slightly more effective. The old order of buttons may still be used. The full command is usually "(Time Limiter) (on subject) has anything been _______ or is there anything you have been _______" for some of them which don't fit with "has anything been _______". The (on _______) may be omitted. The Time Limiter is seldom omitted as it leads the pc to Itsa the Whole Track. On an RRing goal found and used in R3SC the Time Limiter "In this Lifetime" can be used with good effect. All Service Fac questions or Prepchecks must have a Time Limiter. In running R4 (R3M2), pc's actual GPMs, the goal and RIs are Prepchecked without a Time Limiter as pc is on the whole track anyway. But in all lower levels of auditing, particularly when using a possible goal as a Service Fac, the Time Limiter, usually "In this Lifetime _______", must be used or pc will become Over-Restimulated. For all uses the 18 Prepcheck Buttons now are: SUPPRESSED CAREFUL OF FAILED TO REVEAL INVALIDATED SUGGESTED MISTAKE BEEN MADE PROTESTED ANXIOUS ABOUT DECIDED WITHDRAWN FROM REACHED IGNORED A FAILURE HELPED HIDDEN REVEALED ASSERTED SOLVED BIG MID RUDS It will be noted that the first 9 are the Big Mid Ruds used as "Since the Last Time I audited you has anything been _______ ?" A USEFUL TIP To get the Meter clean on a list during nulling the list the easiest system is to show the pc the list and just ask, "What happened?" This saves a lot of Mid Ruds. TWO USEFUL PAIRS When trying to get an Item to read the two buttons Suppress and Invalidate are sometimes used as a pair. To get a pc easier in session the buttons Protested and Decided are sometimes used as a pair. DIRTY NEEDLE Mid Ruds (called because Middle of Session was the earliest use + Rudiments of a Session) are less employed today because of the discovery that all Dirty Needle phenomena is usually traced to the auditor having cut the pc's communication. To get rid of a Dirty Needle one usually need ask only, "Have I cut your Communication?" or do an ARC Break assessment if that doesn't work. A Dirty Needle (continuously agitated) always means the auditor has cut the pc's Itsa Line, no matter what else has happened. Chronically comm chopping auditors always have pcs with Dirty Needles. Conversely, pcs with high Tone Arms have auditors who don't control the Itsa Line and let it over-restimulate the pc by getting into lists of problems or puzzlements, but a high Tone Arm also means a heavy Service Fac, whereas a Dirty Needle seldom requires Mid Ruds or Prepchecks. It just requires an auditor who doesn't cut the pc's Itsa Line. THE OLD ORDER OF PREPCHECK BUTTONS The following buttons and order were the original buttons and may still be used, particularly if the pc is allergic to Mid Ruds: SUPPRESSED INVALIDATED BEEN CAREFUL OF SUGGESTED WITHHELD PROTESTED HIDDEN REVEALED MISTAKE (BEEN MADE) ASSERTED CHANGED (OR ALTERED) DAMAGED WITHDRAWN (FROM) CREATED DESTROYED AGREED (WITH) IGNORED DECIDED L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.bh Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 150 HCOB 23 SEP 63 TAPE COVERAGE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY (TV5 p. 365-66, NTV VII p. 302-4) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1963 Central Orgs SCIENTOLOGY 0 TO V TAPE COVERAGE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY Due to certain pressures in the world at the end of 1962, I deemed it advisable to speed up research as a means of handling developing situations. This activity proved fruitful beyond any expectations for the period devoted to it. To increase an already burdened personal time schedule was not without repercussion. It was in the first place impossible to crowd more action into the crowded hours but somehow I did so. I cut out all social engagements, almost all appointments and even reduced time spent talking to students. I cancelled all lecture appearances abroad. I let my cars and motorcycles rust and my cameras gather dust. I kept Mary Sue up all night auditing or being audited. And somehow, through the devotion of staff, everywhere, kept the show on the road and handled the legal front also. The stepped up schedule period has not ended but the golden knowledge has been gathered in and all targets hoped for have been exceeded. This period has also been hard on staff, students and all Scientologists due to shifting technology. One of the ways of reducing research time is omitting written records. Therefore I have relied on the Saint Hill Course Lecture tapes to bear the burden of collecting the data together. On these tapes over a certain period we have a full record of the results of this stepped up period of research. What one is greeted with, in listening to these tapes, is a whole new clarification of Scientology including breaking it into progressive classes or levels of data. Hardly any HCO Bulletins mirror this period. It is all on tapes. A full progressive summary of Modern Scientology from the lowest to the highest levels is to be found on the following tapes: 24 July '63 - ARC Breaks and the Comm Cycle. 25 July '63 - Comm Cycles in Auditing. 6 August '63 - Auditing Comm Cycles. 7 August '63 - R2-H Fundamentals. 8 August '63 - R2-H Assessment. 14 August '63 - Auditing Tips. 15 August '63 - The Tone Arm. 20 August '63 - The Itsa Line. 21 August '63 - The Itsa Line (continued). 22 August '63 - Project 80. 27 August '63 - Rightness and Wrongness. 28 August '63 - The TA and the Service Facsimile. 29 August '63 - Service Facsimile (continued). 3 September '63 - R3SC. 4 September '63 - How to Find a Service Facsimile. 5 September '63 - Service Fac Assessment. 10 September '63 - Destimulation of a Case. 11 September '63 - Service Facs and GPMs. 12 September '63 - Service Facs. 17 September '63 - What You Are Auditing. 18 September '63 - St Hill Service Fac Handling. 19 September '63 - Routine 4M-TA. 24 September '63) Summary - 25 September '63) (These three lectures not yet given at time 26 September '63) of writing this HCO Bulletin.) Additionally we have some earlier tapes that amplify the material of the pc's Actual GPMs and the theory behind them in:. 20 November '62 - The GPM. 28 March '63 - The GPM. 2 April '63 - Line Plot, Items. 4 April '63 - Anatomy of the GPM. 16 April '63 - Top of GPM. Other tapes made up to 24 July 1963 carry the full story of Implant GPMs, their patterns and handling and the Whole Track. These have only passing importance as a pc's Actual Goals and GPMs are a thousand thousand times more aberrative and important than Implants. But one has to know the extent and nature of Implant GPMs in order not to get them confused with Actual GPMs. The road into Scientology, the road to Clear and the road to OT are all delineated on the tapes listed above between 24 July '63 and 26 September '63, a total of 25 tapes. (I anticipate 3 of these lectures for this week in order to get out this HCO Bulletin.) Thus in 25 1 1/2 hour tapes we have a summary and clarification and new data on Modern Scientology for all levels and classes. Auditing has been redefined, comm cycles have been inspected, Service Facsimiles have been unearthed and clarified. Most old auditing problems have been swept away and the road has been opened. This has been a fantastic and dramatic period in the history and development of Scientology and I'm proud that it came off. And I thank you from the bottom of my heart for the floods of congratulations that have been pouring in from everywhere as these tapes have been released. History has been made. Scientology is capable of fully freeing Man. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.cden Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 151 HCOPL 24 SEP 63 URGENT COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS (CANC. PER OEC) (OEC V4 p 166-7) [Ed. Note: DofT = Director of Training] HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 24 SEPTEMBER 1963 Tech Dirs D of Ts Academy Instructors Academy Students SHSBC Instructors SHSBC Students URGENT COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS Ron wants to re-write the Rules and Regulations applicable to Courses throughout Scientolqgy. The purpose of the rules and regulations is to enable training in Scientology to be unhindered as far as possible by the untoward behaviour of students and instructors and by the state of the quarters where the instruction takes place. He therefore requires that every Academy Staff Member and every student at present on Course (SHSBC included) send in suggested rules under the headings below so that a code of regulations can be drawn up. Instructors please write: 1. Rules they consider necessary for students to abide by in order to make instruction and admin easier. 2. Rules they would like instructors to abide by. 3. Rules they would like to see in force regarding the quarters (premises and contents) where the Course is run. In force regarding the quarters (premises and At least three suggestions are required under each of the three headings. Students please write: 1. Rules they would like their fellow students to abide by. 2. Rules they would like instructors to abide by. 3. Rules they would like to see in force regarding the quarters (premises and contents) where the Course is run. At least twelve suggestions required under each heading. HCO Sees are to arrange for suggestions to be written on the reverse of a copy of this letter by every staff member and student, and sent to me in bulk within seven days of receipt of this letter by the HCO Sec. Existing rules may be used as a guide. Issued by: Reg Sharpe Course Secretary SHSBC for L. RON HUBBARD Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD LRH:dr.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [Attachment] COURSE RULES AND REGULATIONS NAME: ___________ DATE: _________ State whether student or Staff position held _______ ACADEMY: ___________ List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules for Students on Course. List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules for Instructors on Course. List at least 12 (or 3 for Staff Members) suggested Rules for quarters (premises and contents) of the Course. Write legibly. If there is not enough room on this form use another sheet of paper with your name on it and pin it securely to this form. ================== 152 HCOB 25 SEP 63 ADEQUATE TONE ARM ACTION (TV5 p. 367-68, NTV VII p. 305-6) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1963 Central Orgs Franchise SCIENTOLOGY I to IV ADEQUATE TONE ARM ACTION Now that it has been established fully that a pc's gain is directly and only proportional to Tone Arm Action, the question of how much Tone Arm Action is adequate must be answered. These are rough answers based on direct observation of pcs after sessions. Tone Arm action is measured by DIVISIONS DOWN PER 2 1/2 hour session or per hour of auditing. TA action is not counted by up and down, only down is used. Usually the decimal system is used. But fractions can also be employed. Needle falls are neglected in the computation, only actual motion of the Tone Arm is used. One can add up or approximate the TOTAL DOWN TONE ARM MOTION. After a session, if an auditor is keeping good reports of TA motion, one adds up all the divisions and fractions of division of Down Motion (not up) and the result is known as TOTAL TA FOR THE SESSION. A needle gives about a 10th of a Division of motion in one sweep across the dial but, as above, is not used in his computation. Needle action is neglected in the add-up. Example: As noted in the TA column of an auditor's report, 4.5, 4.2, 4.8, 4.0, 3.5 gives you .3 +.8 +.5 gives you 1.6 Divisions of TA action for that period of time. When this is done for a full 2.5 hour session the following table gives you a rough idea of what is expected and what will happen to the pc. Amount Per Session Session Rating PC Reaction 25 Divs Excellent Feels wonderful 20 Divs Good Feels good 15 Divs Acceptable Feels "Better" 10 Divs Poor Slight Change 5 Divs Unacceptable No Change 0 Divs Harmful Gets Worse Anything from 10 Divs to 0 Divs of Down Tone Arm for a 2 1/2 hour session is something to do something about. One gets very industrious in this range. For a 25 hour intensive the scale of TA divisions down for the entire intensive would be: Amount Per Intensive Session Rating PC Reaction 250 Divs Excellent Feels wonderful 200 Divs Good Feels good 150 Divs Acceptable Feels "Better" 100 Divs Poor Slight Change 50 Divs Unacceptable No Change 0 Divs Harmful Gets Worse The preclear's case state can be completely predicted by the amount of TA action received in a session or an intensive. The only exception is where the pc in running R4 (old R3) processes can get into a "creak" of by-passed goals or RIs which make him uncomfortable although TA action has been good or even excellent. A case analysis will locate the by-passed charge. On any auditing where charge has been by-passed but TA action was good the pc's subjective reality on gain will not seem to compare with the TA action gotten in the auditing, but the moment the by- passed charge is located the gain attributable to TA action will be felt. L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 153 HCOPL 25 SEP 63 HATS OF STUDENT INSTRUCTORS FOR SHSBC (CANC PER OEC) (OEC V4 p 168-70) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 SEPTEMBER 1963 Sthil HATS OF STUDENT INSTRUCTORS FOR SHSBC Hat of Student Instructor Supervisor 1. To see that the Student Instructors know and carry out the procedures in: (a) Auditing Section (b) Practical Section (c) Theory Section 2. To act as terminal for the Student Instructors and should necessity arise re-arrange the weekly schedule. 3. To see that the Student Instructors are on post on time. 4. To see that the Student Instructors keep up their own Theory and Practical Check Sheets and weekly TR drills. 5. To arrange ARC break assessments and to supervise same. Student Instructors Auditing Section Duties The purpose of student instructors in the Auditing Section is to assist the Auditing Supervisor with direct personal observation and control of individual auditing sessions. In order to accomplish the above student instructors have the following duties: 1. Know in detail all the auditing activities permitted in the section assigned. 2. Ensure that the sessions in the assigned unit are started and ended on time, are properly located and all pcs and auditors are present. Be sure that the auditing schedule is being followed. 3. Check all sessions to see if auditors are following the D of P instructions in the folder and/or the correct auditing procedure of that unit and reporting any digression to the instructor of that unit. The evening student instructor may give a note to the student auditor pointing out the error and must state the error on his report to the auditing supervisor. No other action may be taken. 4. Report Gross Auditing Errors to the instructor in charge of the unit. Evening instructors note them in their nightly report to the auditing supervisor. Gross auditing errors are. 1. Can't read meter. 2. Don't know procedure. 3. Can't complete auditing cycle. 4. Can't complete auditing cycle repetitively. 5. Doesn't pull missed W/Hs. 6. Can't handle an ARC break. 7. Can't handle a PTP or put pc into session. 8. Chronic cutting of pc's itsa line. 5. Write up informative, helpful pink sheets covering the whole unit. Each auditor should receive at least one pink sheet per week. Turn completed pink sheets over to the instructor in charge of that unit for issuing. Write up infractions for lateness, rule breakage, refusal to obey instructions, etc, and turn them over to the instructor in charge of that unit for issue. Morning student instructors report to the instructor in charge of that unit immediately and evening student instructors send a daily written report to the Auditing Supervisor on all of the following conditions: 1. Failure to follow auditing directions. 2. Lack of TA action. 3. No auditing being done. 4. Any session not going smoothly. (Pc nattery and ARC breaky with no resolution of the causes.) 5. Any suppression of data with regard to the session activity on the auditing report. 6. Any case that looks like blowing. 7. Any excellent auditing. 8. All student auditing enquiries are handled by saying, "Do what you are going to do", and write up an infraction for unauthorised break. The auditing section gives the students the reality that they will get results by first applying the basic fundamentals and then following exact procedure. The student auditor can do it. The student instructor helps them by getting them to do it. Get the student to apply the basic fundamentals and exact procedure and they will get results. Auditing Supervisor Procedure for Student Instructors Theory Section All the Theory Section student instructors are examiners. Their job is to make the student knows and understands the correct data contained in the theory material listed on the check sheet. 1. The first thing a new student instructor does in the Theory Section is study and get checked out on HCO Policy Letter of February 14, 1963 - "How to Examine, Theory Examinations", and HCO Policy Letter of March 15, AD 13 - "Check Sheet Rating System" 2. The student instructor then gets a sheet of goldenrod paper, a master check sheet and a testing location from the Theory Supervisor. Put your name and the date at the top of the goldenrod paper and use it to record the flunks and passes for each student tested. During a lull period in the testing and about 10 minutes before the end of the assigned period stop your testing and record the flunks and passes on the Master Roster and our copy of the student check sheet. 3. At the time of the check out record the results on the goldenrod sheet, sign, date and record pass or flunk on the student's copy of the bulletin. Sign your full surname on both check sheets. Never use your initials. 4. Record in the master roster in the column designated Flunk or Pass a slash mark for every pass or flunk a student has been given. The 5th slash mark is made through the previous 4 making a definite group of 5. In the Pass columns the Ist 10 passes go in the Ist pass column, the 2nd 10 passes in the 2nd pass column, etc. Never leave the Theory Section until all passes and flunks are fully recorded on the master roster and our copies of the student's check sheet, the master roster and check sheet binder is never to be touched unless you are on duty as a student instructor. No check outs are to be given except when you are on duty as a student instructor. 6. When a student passes a bulletin say "Pass". When a student flunks a bulletin say "Flunk". 7. If you ask a general question, be willing to get a general answer. If you want a specific answer, ask for it specifically. 8. Only ask enough questions to be certain that the student knows the correct data contained on the bulletin. This may be as few as one question or as many as 50. 9. An examiner's job is to determine whether the student knows the data or not. If the student does, he passes. If the student doesn't, he flunks. 10. Ask direct, straight-forward questions and keep accurate up-to-date records, and the students will work hard and continue winning with their theory. Theory Section Supervisor Practical A Student Instructor:- 1. Calls roll promptly at 1.0 pm and 3.0 pm each day and at 4.55 pm on Mondays. A "That's it" is given at 2.50 pm and 4.45 pm each day and at 6.0 pm on Mondays. 2. Reports any student not present at roll call to the Training Office if the Practical Supervisor is not present. The student must be found. 3. Sees that students are paired up immediately after roll call. If one student is left over it must be reported at once to the Practical Supervisor or to the Training Office. Another student must then be sent over from Theory or that student goes to Theory and comes over the next period. 4. Infractions. See Auditing Section Infractions. 5. Files all new pink sheets in the green folders. Files all completed pink sheets in green folders and puts an X through the carbon duplicates already in the green folders. These are then put in the Practical Supervisor's top basket. This is done every day immediately after No. 3 has been done. 6. On Monday, student instructor chooses two chair monitors, whose duties are to place in Chapel at 4.45 pm on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, approximately 9 chairs in 9 rows leaving a gangway down the middle, 4 chairs on the left, 5 chairs on the right (looking downwards towards the blackboard). If television, the chairs are placed accordingly. 7. At the beginning of each period, goes round to each couple and marks in any check outs the student has completed since the last practical period. 8. Knows exactly how each drill is run, and when not checking a student out, is constantly moving from couple to couple seeing that the drills are being run properly and correcting any errors. Practical Supervisor Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD LRH:gl.rd Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ================== 156 BPL 27 SEP 63 TRAINING TECHNOLOGY PINK SHEETS (OEC V4 p 171-3) [There is a 16 Jun 74 Revision, this was changed to a BPL] HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1963 Sthil TRAINING TECHNOLOGY PINK SHEETS All the study in the world isn't going to make an auditor. Learning the data and the theory of auditing is vitally important. Perfecting your practical drills is essential. However, the final test lies with the question, "Are you getting results with your Pc?" Whether you are getting results or not is totally dependent on whether or not you are actually applying the data and theory you have learned, and are utilizing the practical skills you have developed. The bridge between the learning of data and development of practical skills and their actual application in the auditing session can be mightily bolstered by the Pink Sheet system of Auditing Supervision. HOW TO ISSUE PINK SHEETS 1. Put two sheets of pink foolscap size paper on a clipboard with a carbon between. 2. At the top of the sheet write the name of the student auditor being observed, the date and the name of the observer. 3. Head a wide column on the right hand side of the sheet with "Observations", a narrow column to the left of centre with "Theory and Practical Assignment" and two more narrow columns on the left hand side with "Coach" and "Instructor". 4. Take the above with your ball point into the vicinity of the auditing session to be observed, close enough to hear and see what is going on without intruding in the session. 5. Write in the wide column labelled "Observations" exactly what is happening in the session. This is very difficult to do for most people, (especially for someone at the case level of "only able to confront own evaluations"). Do not look for auditing errors. Just look and record what is happening. Do not write in evaluation. Do not write in invalidations. Do not attempt to correct or teach in the "Observations" columns. Simply observe the session and record what is happening. 6. After you have filled one or more pages of the "Observations" column, now is the time to evaluate. Study what you have observed taking place in the session and see if anything actually diverges from the correct theory and practice of auditing. 7. Write in the column headed "Theory and Practical Assignment" the date and title of the exact bulletin or tape containing the correct data or the title of the exact practical drill which will correct the error recorded in the "Observations" column. If the session observed was a complete shambles, it means that some basic, basic fundamental of auditing is absent in the student auditor's repertory. Don't overload the student with tons of drills and theory assignments. Look over your "Observations" column carefully and it will suddenly dawn on you that this student hasn't a clue about the auditing cycle or doesn't note the difference between the needle and the TA on the meter. If you still can't find the main difficulty, you can always sit the student down and ask something like "What happens when you sit down in front of a PC?", or "What's the meter for?" You'll be surprised with some of the answers you'll get. On the other hand you might find that you'll fill up a couple of pages of pink sheet without recording any errors. The auditor didn't happen to goof. That's fine - send it to him without any assignment. It will still help him. Send the top copy of the Pink Sheet to the student and file the carbon copy in the student's Pink Sheet folder. When the completed top copy is returned by the student, with all the necessary signatures, throw away the carbon copy and replace it with the completed top copy. PINK SHEET EXAMPLES 1. The following would be a poor Pink Sheet: Theory & Practical Assignments: | Observations. | TR0 | Poor TR0 Meter Reading | Auditor can't read the meter Tape of Sep 18 '62 Aud Cycle | Lousy handling of auditing cycle In the above example the observer has evaluated, invalidated, only made general comments. The above may all be true but the student auditor is not helped by them, and the assignments don't pinpoint his major difficulty. 2. The following would be a helpful pink sheet: Theory & Practical | Observations. Assignments: | | Auditor leaning on table toying | with the TA and pen. Running "Since | the last time I audited you" + TR-3 | buttons. Called a speeded rise on | "Careful of" clean. On "F to R" pc | said "I don't think that answered Tape of Sep 18 '62 | the question". Aud: "OK. I'll check Aud Cycle | it on the meter". TA blew down to | clear read on "F to R". Aud went on | to clean "Invalidate" In the above example the observer states exactly what is happening in the auditing session. The majority of observations noted show an inability to complete an Auditing Cycle. (Even the Missed Meter read was an incomplete cycle.) The student is therefore assigned material that will help him learn and apply the auditing cycle. There may be other things that can help him like TR-0 or Meter Drills. However adding these to the Pink Sheet will only disperse his attention which should be applied to learning and using the Auditing Cycle. COACHING PINK SHEETS Pink Sheets should be coached in both Practical and Theory. The coach first reviews the observations thoroughly with the student and goes over and over the bulletin or drill with the student until the correct data is completely learned and understood or until the student can perfectly execute the drill. Once this is done, the coach signs his name opposite the assignment notation on the Pink Sheet in the coach's column. The student is then ready to have a test on the assigned material. CHECKING OUT PINK SHEETS In checking out the assigned material on the student's Pink Sheet, the instructor should carefully go over the "Observations" with the student and have the student spot the specific errors he has made, then have the student give the correct data from the assigned bulletin or tape or show by doing the practical drill that he has now mastered the skill that was poorly applied in the auditing session. The whole bulletin or drill should be reviewed by the instructor but specific attention should be paid to points that the student was observed to be weak in applying to his auditing. Be doubly strict on these points to be sure the student doesn't continue to make the same errors again and again. If each Pink Sheet thoroughly corrects only one gross auditing error, really knocks it out, the student's auditing ability will improve markedly in a very short time. CONCLUSIONS Pink Sheets are never used as punishment or to make the student wrong. They are used to improve the student's auditing ability by having him thoroughly learn data and practical skills he is weak in. A student's weakness in data and skills often will not show up under the normal conditions of theory and practical testing but they will stick out like a sore thumb when he has to apply them in an actual auditing session. Therefore, a Pink Sheet Assignment does not mean that the student hasn't learned the material if he has already passed it in Theory or Practical. It does mean that he hasn't learned it WELL ENOUGH to utilize it under the duress of an actual auditing session. If a student has gone a whole week without receiving a Pink Sheet, he should start screaming. If his auditing is not being observed and his weak points picked up, how does he expect to improve? So, make a fuss, Student, if you are not receiving Pink Sheets. And, Instructors, keep a tabulation of when a student is issued a Pink Sheet so that you are sure to observe each student at least once a week. Issued by: Fred Hare Auditing Supervisor SHSBC for L. RON HUBBARD Authorized by: L. RON HUBBARD LRH:jw.aap Copyright c 1963 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IAmended by HCO P/L 20 December 1970 (reissued & corrected 26 January 1971), Pink Sheets, which was later cancelled by a 9 January 1973 revision of the above policy, HCO P/L 27 September 1963R, Training Technology - Pink Sheets, in the OEC Year Books.] ================== 157 HCOB 28 SEP 63 ACTUAL GOALS (NTV VII p. 307-11, previously considered confidential) HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 28 SEPTEMBER 1963 (Amplifies HCO Bulletin of 8 May 1963) Missions All Saint Hill Graduates Scientology Four Important ACTUAL GOALS (This HCO Bulletin should be of great interest to older Saint Hill Graduates) The actual goals and items of the preclear are several thousand times more aberrative than implant GPMs. I have covered the entire scope of implanted goals and implants in general and we are fortunate to have all this material. An auditor must know it to cope with Class IV auditing as these implant GPMs become confused with actual Goals Problem Masses on a meter. Further, the implanted GPM gives the student auditor a marvelous training ground for running actual GPMs, and it is recommended that the implant GPM be studied and some of them run before the auditor tries to handle actual GPMs. Furthermore, it was wise to know all the tricks "out there" before we went. So I had to collect them for you. Confusion between implant and actual GPMs occurs because the implanters used types of goals and patterns found in actual GPMs. Implanters obviously had a knowledge, from historical record or even research, of what a thetan's own goals look like but obviously they never developed the data to a workable therapy or they probably would not have continued to be driven to such costly expedients as continuous implanting, between lives installations, etc. The highest level of treatment technology known to exist in the universe before Scientology was Pictureology wherein, at a signal from the therapist, the thetan crunched up the engram. This is currently in use (and has been for many trillions of years) in the Galactic Confederation. There are few further complications to it except putting the thetan under control with sleep lights. Pictureology is very close to implanting. The practitioner gets a picture of the scene of the accident, holds it before the thetan and snaps a pair of bars, not unlike cine clap sticks, before the thetan. The thetan eventually gets the idea and angrily or otherwise duplicates the action of the stick by crunching his own engram. There are numerous kinds of traps and ways of catching and freezing a thetan. These are categorized as Projectile which shoot a thetan, usually with beams or lights; Luring which cause a thetan to inspect; Pole which trap a thetan with his own energy; Prison which imprison the thetan; and Maze which confuse a thetan. Temperature and perhaps chemicals are used to paralyze a thetan once caught. All other mental activities are done by implanting. Screen implants cause the thetan to put his pictures up on a screen where they are misdated and scrambled. Picture implants simply show the thetan pictures which he recoils from or takes to be his own. Picture implants are also occasionally filled with false dates. They give the thetan false pasts and futures. They often repeat the actual beginning and ending of the incident in picture form, making it hard to get before or after the implant as one sees pictures of his arrival and departure and so thinks he is not into the implant or out of it. Goal implants are the third and most serious type of implant. They take a goal and pattern of items with left and right firing poles or jets and implant terminals and opposition terminals. The pattern is a too regular GPM not unlike a thetan's own GPMs. This confuses the thetan as to his own goals and seeks to scramble his own goals and items. The implanted GPM gets confused into the thetan's own GPMs and often in running a thetan's own goals and items one gets into implant goals or items and vice versa. One only needs to straighten it out by carefully asking on the meter if this is an installed goal or items or an actual one. The things one runs for gain today on the pc are: 1. R1C (Itsa Line). 2. R2T (dating somatics). 3. R2H (ARC breaks). 4. R3SC (Service Facsimile Clearing). 5. R4M2 (formerly R3M2). Finding goals is done via R3SC. R4M2 listing takes the first RR on the item list. The auditor stops the pc and reads the item and says "Is this your item" and concludes then the usual R3M2 steps. The change of designation from R3 to R4 is to agree with the new levels of Scientology. All Routine 3 materials are now called Routine 4 because it belongs in Level 4 (OT). Engram Running by Chains remains R3 and is used for this lifetime. R3N (Running Implant Goals) is now R4N and is otherwise unchanged. R4M2 is unchanged except for letting the pc itsa whether or not the RRing item is his or her item. One doesn't let the pc have an item that doesn't rocket read on being called. ______________ It is almost amusing to note how hard implanters work and what overts they must feel they run up, and to note as well that if it were not for a thetan's own Goals Problem Masses they could effect nothing harmful. How hard they work. And all for nothing. They are not the source of aberration. They merely make the universe seem more unpleasant. As for creating aberration, they could not. Sleep lights, screens, false-picture projectors, goal implants alike are wholly innocuous compared to the thetan's own Goals Problem Masses. One aberrates himself. And if he did not, nobody else could. ______________ The service facsimile is in actual fact the two top reliable items of the last (present time) pc's actual Goals Problem Mass. This does not prevent one from using R3SC. On the contrary this makes R3SC work. The pc's present time (current) goal can be used as a service facsimile if accidentally found providing one uses it in R3SC process with "In this lifetime" appended to every command employed. PROGRAMING R4M2 In programing R4M2: 1. If you find an actual correct goal of the pc, run it only if it is the present time (latest) goal on the track. If not, do goal oppose lists until you do find the present time goal. 2. Unless you've done a lot of RlC and R3SC on the pc the present time over-restimulation keeps the present time goal (or any actual goal) from being found. 3. It is easier to find an implant goal than an actual goal, so carefully ask about it and sort out any goal on the meter. 4. Get the pc's actual present time GPM before you do any R4M2 on it. Don't go listing items on a backtrack GPM. 5. Start a present time actual GPM by listing for the top terminal. It's easier to find the top terminal, for the PT GPM is usually truncated (incomplete). 6. Go on down through the GPM to the goal. 7. Find the next goal below the present time one. List the present time goal as an RI to find the top oppterm of the next goal. (Note: this step is optional. A bank can be cleaned up without finding the next goal below. NEVER include this step if your pc is getting less than 20 divs of down TA per session, as you won't find the lower GPM until you have completed the one you're working. So omit finding next goal on low TA motion pcs and find it ollly when all other steps are taken.) 8. Go back to the present time GPM. Read the items already found on the line plot to the pc. Take the highest one (nearest PT) that ticks. Complete the list from which it came from (not the list that opposes it or it opposes). 9. Using the new item found continue R4M2 on the current GPM. 10. When no more items exist in the top (present time) GPM, prepcheck the goal and all auditing on goals and items. 11. Go to the next GPM for which you already have the top oppterm and continue with R4M2. 12. Use the same steps used on the present time GPM to run and clean up each GPM in turn. GPMs are run from the latest (nearest present time) back down the track. Items are found from the latest (top, nearest present time) to earlier always. The pc's reality is always greatest at the nearest to PT end of any GPM, no matter how far back they are. Overlisting lists is all that gets the pc skipping about and into other GPMs. So keep the lists very short, 5-10 items, just until the first RR is seen. List only until the item being listed from does not tick on test. Keep the pc's itsa line in. Let the pc say it is or isn't his. But don't let the pc have an item that doesn't RR. Don't worry the pc about tone arm or auditing actions. Let the pc run his bank, you run the session. Do careful case analysis (ARC break lists and case analysis lists - to be published) - when the case goes wrong. Find lots of reliable items. If you don't let the pc have lots, he has nothing to itsa. Therefore you get less tone arm action. Actual GPMs give far more TA action than implants on R4N, the implant GPM routine that uses line plots. The pc's own line plot is quite individual, like the original line plot for "To Scream" in HCOBs. Implant GPMs are all pattern (same RIs every time). It is easy, on overlisting (or listing only by blowdown as has been tried) for the pc to skip RIs or get into wrong GPMs. The auditor must be careful not to run an actual GPM below the goal as an item and into the next GPM. The only thing that will turn off the pc's rocket read is running items out of a GPM for which one does not have the goal. Running a backtrack GPM before the present time GPM is run (or skipping a GPM going back) sows the earlier line plot with items from the missed GPM. The pc's current actions are always explained by the pair of items nearest present time. This is true for all GPMs no matter how far back you've run. The pc has only a small number of actual GPMs, less than 50. Perhaps no more than 20. The length of the time track is infinitely greater than one supposes. Trillions one hundred is not the start of track. That's trillion written one hundred times. One seldom dates in R4M2 and only then to orient some item worrying the pc that has gotten out of place and only then by order of magnitude of years ago. Anything worrying the pc or reducing his capability or life potential is to be found in actual items or goals, not in engrams or implants. These are not primary causes. Only the pc's own goals and items are capable of basically causing the trouble. The whole explanation of how an RI forms lies in the discussions of the service facsimile and the original explanations of the Goals Problem Mass 1962. ______________ I am sorry to have caused auditors of this period to work so hard on R3N implant goals. But without this data and understanding found between May and September of 1963 actual GPMs are impossible to handle as one gets into implants. A pc's confront of his own GPMs is increased by running implant GPMs providing TA action occurs in sufficient quantity. After running a few implant GPMs one comes up to contempt for their aberrative value. The pc is lucky who has run a few before tackling his own GPMs. THE PC's OWN GOALS AND ITEMS ARE THE FINAL ROAD TO OT. L. RON HUBBARD Founder ==================