deja.com
Please visit our sponsor
Explore by clicking here
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
 Home  »  People  »  Humanities
 >>  Theology 
fz bible 2/19
Explore More:

The Ultimate Directory
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

Classifieds
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

Price Comparison
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

5¢ long distance!
Save $$$$$.

The Best of ZDNet
Delivered to you free!

Earth's Biggest Selection
Shop at Amazon.com

Rate it!
Simo Nordic Cruiser
or choose another to rate
(1=worst, 5=best)
Safety
15
Ease of use
15
Comfort
15
Cost / Benefit
15

  • Compare it to others
  • User Comments
  • Shop new or used
     
  • top rated
    Baby Strollers
    1. Evenflo On My Way Travel System (Stroller/Car Seat)
    2. Aprica Quantum Royale
    3. Baby Trend Sit N Stand LX II Twin Stroller
    4. Baby Trend Sit N Stand LX III Twin Stroller
    5. Baby Trend Snap N Go
  • See the full list...
  • Deja Forums
    Atheism
    Atheism
    Atheism
    Satirical atheism
    Atheism
     
    Deja Communities
    Kalico Family Network
    Surname Search
    JIROVEC FAMILY
    Genealogy Life
    genclassifieds

    Start your own community in Theology.  

    My Deja
    Get more out of Deja: Register to easily manage your discussions and communities, and improve your searches. Plus, get email alerts about new posts in your favorite discussions with Deja Tracker!
     
      discussions     ratings     communities  
      back to search results 
    Help | Feedback
    >> Community
    Next in Search
       >> Forum: alt.religion.scientology
          >> Thread: FZ Bible 2/19 CLASS 8 TAPES
            >> Message 1 of 18
     
    Subject:FZ Bible 2/19 CLASS 8 TAPES
    Date:1999/07/04
    Author:Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
      Posting History Post Reply

    FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
     
    CLASS VIII TAPE TRANSCRIPTS 2/19
     
    **************************************************
     
    CLASS VIII TAPE TRANSCRIPTS - CONTENTS
     
    01  SEP 24, 1969 WELCOME TO THE CLASS VIII COURSE
    02  SEP 25, 1969 WHAT STANDARD TECH DOES
    03  SEP 26, 1969 THE LAWS OF CASE SUPERVISION
    04  SEP 27, 1969 STANDARD TECH DEFINED
    05  SEP 28, 1969 THE STANDARD GREEN FORM AND RUDIMENTS
    06  SEP 29, 1969 MECHANICS OF TECHNIQUES AND SUBJECT MATTER
    07  SEP 30, 1969 CASE SUPERVISOR DO'S AND DONT'S:
    08  OCT  1, 1969 CERTAINTY OF STANDARD TECH
    09  OCT  2, 1969 THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING
    10  OCT  3, 1969 ASSISTS
    11  OCT  7, 1969 ASSESSMENT AND LISTING BASICS
    12  OCT  8, 1969 MORE ON BASICS
    13  OCT  9, 1969 ETHICS AND CASE SUPERVISION
    14  OCT 10, 1969 AUDITOR ATTITUDE AND THE BANK
    15  OCT 11, 1969 AUDITORS ADDITIVES, LISTS AND CASE SUPERVISION
    16  OCT 12, 1969 STANDARD TECH
    17  OCT 13, 1969 THE BASICS AND SIMPLICITY OF STANDARD TECH
    18  OCT 14, 1969 THE NEW AUDITOR'S CODE
    19  OCT 15, 1969 AN EVALUATION OF EXAMINATION ANSWERS
     
     
    **************************************************
     
    STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
     
    Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
    Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
     
    The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
    Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
    copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
     
    They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians,
    Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
     
    The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
    of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
     
    We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
    to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
     
    But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
    the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
    testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 
     
    We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
    as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
    without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
     
    We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
    not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
    that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
    to aid us for that reason.
     
    Thank You,
     
    The FZ Bible Association
     
    **************************************************
     
    6809C25 Class VIII TAPE 2
     
    WHAT STANDARD TECH DOES
     
    Thank you. Thank you. And here we are. What's the date?
    It's the 25th of September AD 18.
     
    In the parlance of former religions, 1968.
     
    Well we have a few, we have a few telegrams here. Please
    relay our congratulations to first Class VIII course, and
    to Ron who made it possible. You have our fullest Hawaiian
    aloha.
     
    John, LRH Communicator Hawaii, for EC Hawaii and all
    Scientologists in Hawaii.
     
    And here's congratulations first Class VIII course
    students. Standard tech is here to stay.
     
    Thank you Ron. LRH Com and staff, San Francisco.
     
    And dear Ron, thanks and appreciation from all Africa and
    Joberg staff and Scientologists on first Class VIII course.
    LRH Comm Africa and LRH Comm Joberg.
     
    Dear Ron, congratulations to you and all students on first
    Class VIII course. We know the boom this will be, and boon
    this will be to mankind. Love, LRH Comms US, ASHO and LA.
     
    Executive Councils US, American Saint Hill Organization and
    Los Angeles.
     
    And send congratulations on first Class VIII course. Love,
    Executive Council ANTS.
     
    Ron, congratulations on Class VIII course. Will be fabulous
    to have a Class VIII case cracking super back. Thanks.
    Love, Kathy, Doris and Phil, Myra, the EC of Seattle Day
    and Foundation. From Seattle.
     
    Congratulations on first ever Class VIII course. May
    success ring throughout Earth and bounce between the
    planets of the universe. Henry and crew, OTL, WW.
     
    To first Class VIII students. Congratulations on being
    chosen and on attending the first ever Class VIII course.
    Fantastic. Love from all Africa and Joberg staff and
    Scientologists.
     
    Very good. Well now, let's get down to business. Where does
    standard tech begin? What is it? It is the accumulation of
    those exact processes which make a way between humanoid and OT.
     
    The exact method of organizing them, the exact method of
    delivering them, and the exact repair of any errors made on
    that route.
     
    Now that is quite remarkable because in actual fact that
    gives you 100 percent. It's a 100 percent action. There are
    no unauditable cases unless they're not present. If you
    can't get them present they are unauditable. And that is
    one of the cases that is unsolvable. And in actual fact the
    only case that is unsolvable.
     
    Now you can think at once, what about the person who is
    being audited against his own determinism? What about the
    unconscious person he is present? What about the
    psychoanalyst, you know the psychoanalyst, he had a lot of
    troubled cases. And let's see, man's never been able to do
    this sort of thing before. And there are different cases.
    And there're also suppressives. And we've got the so forth,
    and question, question, question. And that's what I'm
    trying to cure you monkeys of. Impolite.
     
    Now. In the first place as far as the case who is present
    is concerned, if you did an assessment list and you put
    down a reading item "isn't present", there wouldn't be anybody to do the assessment on, so that is missing on the
    resistive case list. But the rest of them, if you can't
    knock off a hundred percent on it, why you need your
    flywheel adjusted. The uh...  that's a fact. That's a fact.
    There isn't much excuse for missing.
     
    Let us take the fellow who doesn't want to be audited. And
    he is somehow or another persuaded to be present in the
    auditing room. Now you say at once that we will overwhelm the
    mans' determinism, naturally, by forcing auditing on him.
    No, we don't overwhelm his determinism because basically
    his own determinism would want to be audited.
     
    So we have the oldest remedy of this there is, and it
    hasn't changed for years and years and years and years, and
    it does exist. And all you do is engage in itsa on how he
    doesn't and why he doesn't want to be audited. That's all.
    That's the remedy.
     
    If you can get the fellow to explain why he doesn't want to
    be audited, why he hates to be audited, why auditing so
    forth, bopa-wop wop, you've got it. But if you let him
    stray out into the other dynamics you haven't got it. If he
    sits there and tells you how all Scientologists are bad,
    and how no lesson is so hard... then pig face, the big
    politician has said from the depths of his implantedness
    how it's all bad, if you let him go off into this line of
    country you are not following the main line. And the main
    line is simply, why doesn't he want to be audited? Do you
    follow?
     
    Now the other may start to blow off but you may repeat the
    question because he's departed from it. Now if you can get
    him to explain in the fullest extent this exact process, it
    is an exact process. It has no discussion of Scientology
    connected with it whatsoever. It is simply his itsa on the
    subject of. Now, he will come to a point where a basic
    begins to appear into view and you simply go on into
    session and run it. Do you follow? There's nothing to it.
    It's just a session approach.
     
    So therefore he doesn't want to be audited, and he is asked
    to explain why he doesn't want to be audited, and he will
    there upon give as to the reasons why, and then he will hit
    some basic reason why, and you'll find yourself running
    something on the order of a secondary or an engram. Now you
    push him on through it. You don't push him through
    covertly. You never do any of this covertly. I hear of some
    auditor covertly auditing. Ooooo! If he hasn't got his
    hands on the cans you're liable to pass the F/N. And he'll
    hold onto the cans. He doesn't know what they are. We don't
    even know; he doesn't even know what he's talking about.
    But he will, guided in his itsa, guide himself right down
    into the channel of his resistance. It could wind up most
    anyplace. It could wind up in a prep check. It could wind
    up in a secondary. it could wind up, don't you see? And
    he'll start answering these questions and the next thing
    you know he's in session and feels a lot better for it, and
    he'll go away shaking you by the hand.
     
    Now there isn't anything covert about it. You keep your TRs
    in, you do your auditing job, you read your meter the same
    way and everything else. He's explaining why he doesn't
    want to be audited. Do you follow? And it is the most
    fundamental rudiment.
     
    Now I, I look with horror at a green form which winds up as
    one of its' items very late on the green form that the PC
    did not want to be audited in the first place. It takes
    this form. He didn't want a review in the first place. Well
    an auditor's a pretty dim bulb if he hasn't been able to
    detect that.
     
    A fellow comes in, and you say, "Alright, good. Have a seat here." Now at that moment you pick up the first out
    rudiment. See, it's actually not something you put in all
    rudiments, because for the excellent reason it just wastes
    time. This guy sits down, and so on. Now you could say it's
    a missed withhold, it's a this, it's a that. We don't care
    what it is. It's just the fact that he doesn't want to be
    audited. So you think now we're dealing with uh,...  You
    think we're dealing with Mr. Swillengullet the famous
    politician, or Mr. Jogbog who is the famous
    psycho-anal-ist, and you're not.
     
    You're not dealing with the stellar light, you're dealing
    with a Scientologist who has walked up to the examiner,
    having been summoned because he hasn't been auditing for
    the last six months, to find out what the hell's wrong, and
    the examiner has said, "Go have a review. And as the
    review auditor is sitting there this guy walks in. And he's
    uncooperative and very soggy about the whole thing. If you
    simply ask him to explain why he didn't want to be audited
    he would go promptly into session. It is a process.
     
    Alright, now let's get how far this process goes. A fellow
    hasn't been auditing for seven months on his OT3 and it
    isn't flat. So, it's the same process. Why doesn't he want
    to be audited? You could ask it in the version of why isn't
    he auditing, but it comes down to why he doesn't want to be
    audited while auditing. And this situation you will run
    into every now and then.
     
    Now it flies off by accident on most of these lines. You
    achieve this accidentally. And you will see so on many case
    reviews. And you understand standard tech isn't that
    process which is only used in review. Review is that area
    where standard tech is corrected back to standard tech.
     
    If it hasn't been done in the first place it winds up in review.
     
    Now this fellow hasn't been auditing. As a matter of fact I
    have just off hand, I know of about three, two of whom
    didn't want a session, and a third who hasn't audited on
    her 3. Just, just brrrrt Just this. I think there've,
    they've been on my desk in the last 24 hours. So it is not
    an uncommon problem.
     
    And you accidentally hit an ARC break, you hit some
    by-passed charge, you hit some something that goes down the
    line and clears up why he hasn't been auditing. And you
    yourself maybe, if you had a long run on some level, hit
    some period where you really didn't want to sit down and
    audit. You sort of wanted to leave the session and so
    forth. Well, this is the, this is the phenomenon. Now the
    common denominator of hitting the phenomenon to a trained
    auditor would be why he doesn't... why doesn't he want to be
    audited. If some fellow's doing OT sections, something like
    that on himself, anything from R6EW on up the line, and he
    suddenly wants to leave session.
     
    Yeah, he's sitting there, and he's saying, "Aaiii, ugh." Well the rudiment that's out is a horribly simple rudiment.
    He doesn't want to be audited. Now he's just done something
    that fixed it up so he didn't want to be audited. Now at
    that moment, if he is a not-completely dead in his head, he
    is aware of his own activity. That is actually the
    fundamental difference between a Scientologist and a
    humanoid. A Scientologist can, is aware of his activities,
    his mental phenomena, he is aware of his behavior, he has
    an idea of what he is doing. He, he's standing there, nya,
    nya, nya, nya, nying, yang, yap yap, yap yap. And he's all
    of a sudden, "Hey wait a minute. Boy, I must have a missed
    withhold. See, I must have a missed withhold." I mean it's
    as simple as that. You know? He says to himself "Yeah."
     
    He is aware of his own behavior. It is not that he's
    introvertedly critical. And you will find characters
    around, in Scientology, who are not aware of their own
    behavior. And that is the difference between a
    Scientologist and one who isn't.
     
    You will find somebody who apparently has had some of the
    grades run who still attributes his behavior to some sort
    of an act of god or something. "I, I felt, I felt, I felt
    bad today. I, I feel bad today." That's about far as the
    cognition goes, see?
     
    But this, therefore, is a process. You're sitting there
    doing your materials, all of a sudden you feel bad. "Hell
    with it. I think I'm gonna leave. You know, pack it up and
    get out of here.: Well now, being aware of what you're
    doing you all of a sudden recognize this is a symptom.
     
    So, something's wrong. Well you'd better find out what's wrong.
     
    And what's wrong actually will show up on the basis of why
    he didn't want to be audited. If you simply will explain to
    yourself, that's, just sort it out, you know? Just say,
    "Let's see. The reason I don't want to be audited is so and so and so on." Now this can go so far as to make a one item list. That is, a list that is listed to one item. Reading.
    You can actually make a list of it.
     
    If you know your phenomena, you're a well trained auditor.
    "I got an ARC break. I ARC broke myself. Something I don't
    like." That'll show up, and go bingo-bongo.
     
    Now you take somebody, it's very interesting watching
    somebody being audited on the grades who isn't trained even
    in the least. They eventually come up to a level of
    awareness that something is going on but they don't have
    the technology to explain what is going on, and they
    couldn't isolate by-passed charge for the life of 'em. They
    can't, can't isolate. They, they know, "Now wait. Something is wrong in auditing, and something is wrong with me, and
    wmf wnf wmf wnf wmf wmf, and let's see. Oh, it'd be an ARC
    break, PTP, what if I'd gone and missed a withholds. I've
    done something here." He doesn't know what to call it. He
    hasn't got the, he hasn't got the subject matter at his
    fingertips. He doesn't know what to call it, so of course
    he can't handle it.
     
    You know there's wmwmm wmm wmwsm. And you will see one of
    these guys then suddenly moving in the direction of getting
    trained. He knows he's got a deficiency. He doesn't know
    what to call it. But it still comes under the heading of
    explaining why he doesn't want to be audited. And all of a
    sudden, why there's a long blow down, and there it is.
     
    Now I'll tell you something very funny. Something that is
    very amusing. As we used to hear, occasionally, where some
    SP had been operating very well, that Scientologists were
    far, far harder to audit than people in off the street.
    Yes, at the level of non-standard tech I should smell
    'em out. That is certainly true.
     
    Not a guy in off the street, he isn't hard to audit at all.
    He's so damn stupid that he lets the auditor do anything.
    And a Scientologist is only hard to audit by a very lousy
    auditor. Do you follow? Because he's sitting there and all
    of a sudden the fellow says, "Uh, alright. Start of
    session. Good. Now yesterday we were taking up whether or
    not you had overts and so on, and bla bla," and this
    Scientologist sitting in the chair says, "Well what the
    hell are you talking about, man? Where, where the hell are
    your rudiments? Huh? You haven't got this set up.
    What's going on?" The fellow off the street says, "Yeah, that's logical. It it, I don't feel very good about it, but
    yeah, well, overt that we were taking up yesterday. I
    wonder where Gracie Ann is. I wonder... uh, she said she'd
    telephone for it. Yeah, we'd taken up overts. Telephone at
    four. I wonder if she's out with Bill. Um, wawawa,... " But that's just auditing, it's just life, you know. Uhhh... " Oh yeah, very hard to audit. Scientologists are very hard to
    audit. By a lousy auditor.
     
    That's very funny. Because as a case supervisor you can sit
    there and read somebody being driven straight into
    propitiation. Just like a falling piece of lead on a
    non-standard session. And now and then you will see in case
    supervision my comment in folders saying, "Well, maybe we
    got away with it." And that's because I found something
    non-standard in the session. And it's interesting that in
    the last three days I have had back before me for review,
    as a repeat after a completed review, only those cases
    where I read, "Well, maybe we got away with it. I don't
    know. From this folder it all seems to be O/R, but I don't
    know."
     
    And sure enough here, a week, two weeks later, the person
    in back for a review. He's sick at his stomach, he's this,
    he's that or he's the other thing.
     
    So you can go through the actual auditing actions on an
    auditors' report, and at this point of the session he is
    supposed to do whatever he's supposed to do, and he didn't
    do it. And he did something else, and he phrased the
    questions in some other odd way, and then you see a couple
    of Q and A's following this, and then you see the TA
    rising, and then you see indicating by-passed charge of
    auditing over the last floating needle or something, and
    you read down the line on this. And your case supervisor
    report is the auditors' summary sheet, and so on is
    glowing, the PC 'Bright toned, happy at the end. Wanted to
    loan me his car.' The propitiation has entered in to it.
    "Told me what a marvelous auditor I was, and good shape." You can expect in a week or two to see this person in Qual
    with a headache or sick at his stomach, or something else.
     
    And so your well dones are only given to those where the
    session ran off like a clock, exactly on standard tech,
    because you know that works. And there's these little
    divergence's and little zigs and little zags that you see
    in the session. You don't ever call those well done. Not
    because you are being pedantic. Not because you are being
    snotty and mean. But because simply, you know this case
    will probably appear before the examiner in another week or
    two, or before the Master at Arms. He will be in one or two
    of those positions, despite the glowing auditor report.
     
    The summary. It didn't go standard, so the result won't be
    standard.
     
    Now it's remarkable that anybody gets away with what they
    get away with at all. It is better than man has ever heard
    before, has ever seen, and it is quite remarkable, but he
    is much worse off than you ordinarily assume. So the net
    result of all of this is that when it is not standard he
    will have had some gain, it's not all bad, but he'll also
    have not achieved his full gain. And the difference between
    some gain and the difference between that and full gain, is
    the difference between wobbly-bobbly tech and very
    standard, precise tech.
     
    Now standard tech rolls off with a clickety, clickety,
    clickety, clickety, click, with a total invariability. Now
    what you get away with sometimes, we see that the rudiments
    are overrun.
     
    So you will see in a case supervisory report, if this looks
    poor, and so on, is bring the PC back to session and
    indicate the over listed list.
     
    Well that is a funny thing to do. The guy was perfectly
    happy. He's going to loan the auditor his car right after
    the session. Uh, and he got an F/N on it, and that's all
    set, and that's all O/R.
     
    But the proper case supervisor action is to have him
    brought back, although is was apparently very successful,
    and have the over listed list indicated.
     
    I just did a folder, just a few minutes before I came down
    here on a little kid. We have a lot of little cadets in the
    Sea Org. and they're pretty much on the ball. And this
    little kid, I don't know how old he is, uh, oh I don't
    know, seven, eight, something like that. Well, an auditor
    actually doesn't respect the PC if he's a little kid to the
    extent that he did. And it's absolutely fascinating how the
    misapplication of technology just a hair line knocks the
    kid around. In the first place he's being audited from too
    high an altitude to easily protect himself. So there was an
    over listed list on a power process. It went on and on and
    on. I can't imagine what the hell the auditor was thinking
    about. What in the name of god was going on? He had his
    first blow down, it went bong, bong. he even mentions it.
    He marked it and everything, and then he went on listing,
    you know, went on listing, went on listing.
     
    Well, the kid seemed alright. The proper action was to have
    him walk back into session and have the over listed list
    indicated. And that did happen, and the needle F/N'd
    promptly and at once very abundantly. The little kid knew
    something was wrong.
     
    And all of that was not much of a review session. I don't
    know how many minutes were consumed in doing this one
    action. But of course to do that action, why, you have to
    fly the needle, and then do the action. So he also got a
    little, tiny lick and a promise on rudiments, and so on.
    All of this maybe took 3, 4, 5 minutes, something like
    that. Indicated the over listed list and got a nice F/N on
    the thing and the kid cheerfully went out of session again.
     
    So you say, "God damn that's being picky! Wow! The fellow
    had the item indicated, it was alright, it was the correct
    item. Just because we add eighty or ninety additional items
    is no reason to believe; or just because we added five or
    six additional items after the blow down on 5A is no reason
    to be that picky." Oh yeah? One item past the first B/D on
    5A is one too many items. It blew down, that's it.
     
    Now about all the lads gonna do after that is cognite. And
    if you start asking him for more listing items you've
    smothered his cognition. So the needle won't fly.
     
    Now I've got a question here. It's what is a flying needle?
    Now I never punish people for asking questions. They can
    ask all the questions they want to because in that way I
    get an idea of how much they've got to learn.
     
    An F/N that is a real F/N, and so forth, takes off. It
    flies. You can see it disconnect from the bank and start to
    function. So it's just a colloquialism, fly a needle. Float
    a needle. F/N. That's all.
     
    And the explanation is that if you can't obtain an F/N
    promptly and immediately on rudiments with a PC in standard
    tech, something's goofy. There's something wrong. And it
    usually is wrong with the session. Doesn't even go back
    into the past. There's something wrong right there, right now.
     
    So, to give you the difference, this little kid's needle
    probably was doing one of these half inch floats, or
    something like that, and when the over list was indicated
    why it probably went to a three inch float. Full dial
    float. You get the difference?
     
    Now you can expand the floating needle. But if you start
    expanding a floating needle with too thoroughness, you get
    the thing expanded to a half an inch, and then you collapse
    it to a quarter of an inch. And then you try to fly it
    further and it all of a sudden packs up and goes stiff.
     
    Known as overrun. The PC came out of it, and the PC went
    back into it again.
     
    Now the essence of standard tech, all of these things to
    the contrary and merely supplementary, the essence of
    standard tech then is to get somebody in session. And one
    of the best ways to get a person in session who won't be
    audited at all is to ask him to explain why he doesn't want
    to be audited. Have you got that's a process?
     
    Now somebody's going to say "What's the command?" It's... is if there was a canned command for that, then you would miss
    a certain percentage of PCs. You might have to ask him in
    Bottentott, you know? Now the person who has to have the
    exact words of the command is a person who hasn't grasped
    the thing that happens when you ask the command.
     
    Now I'll give you an example. Somebody who wonders at what
    happens with release, or wonders something about how you
    handle an overrun, or wonders and madly goes around in
    circles on this subject, has not mastered, hasn't mastered
    what the hell a release is. Now if he knows what is this
    phenomenon of release, then he can produce it, he can
    unproduce it. But supposing you were trying to fix a radio
    but you didn't know what it did. So let's give a radio to
    the ancient Egyptian physicians. And say "Fix it." Now you could explain to them that you take this funny, flat bladed
    thing and twiddle-diddle it into the shiny buttons in the
    front of it, and that comes down and you hook together the
    wire when it doesn't run. Now you've got to tell him 8,000
    more things, you see, like this wire goes to the that.
    You're teaching him by rote. He doesn't know what a radio
    is. So you've got to have all kinds of exact, rote little
    actions. Do you see? These rote actions By rote I mean the
    Chinese school, you know, type actions. You'd have to have,
    "You take the flat bladed end instrument and you put it in
    to the vertical slot, which is in that, that bright steel
    thing there, and you rotate it against the sun.
     
    Now you'd also have to place the instrument to the south to
    rotate it to the sun." Ah, boo. You better tell him what a
    radio is.
     
    Now if he can't dig what a radio is, Christ almighty don't
    let him fix it! Now the mechanism of release is simply
    this. The guy has obsessively been thinking a mass.
     
    He himself. We know in the first place that his whole bank
    is mocked up by himself and nobody else at his bank, but we
    know also that there's a whole bunch of body thetans that
    are also mocking up banks. And these body thetans are
    copying each others' banks and mocking up banks against
    banks, and he's mocking up banks which are copies of body
    thetans' banks, and body thetans are copying his bank. And
    we've got the most marvelous array of counter, Disowned,
    super copying that you ever heard of. But this, this would
    be very simple if there wasn't such a thing as a body thetan.
     
    Now this guy is thinking a mass, or he's thinking a thought
    which keeps a body thetan mass connected to him. That's the
    exact mechanic of this. And you have made him recognize a
    thought about that thought which causes him to cease to
    think the thought that keeps him connected.
     
    If you go on past the point where the needle floats, you
    have now made him re-think the thought which re-connects
    him, or makes him mock up a bank, or makes the body thetans
    who are mocking up a bank reconnect to him.
     
    That's the mechanism of release. Let him finish his
    cognition. And give him an "That's it." as far as that action is concerned. Now you can release him on other
    actions which are not immediately germane to that action,
    as long as they are very different actions. Now this can go
    so far as if you get an F/N on a green form, in spite of
    the fact that you're doing remedy Bs, S and Ds, or any
    other thing that the green form calls for, and somewhere
    along that line doing the action called a green form which
    the PC recognizes as repair, if while doing that action you
    get an F/N and then knuckle headedly continue on that green
    form, you are going to make him think in terms of repair.
    And he will re-think the thought which re-connects him and
    you might as well not have done it in the first place. You
    get the idea?
     
    So he does the green form to an F/N. And that is that. It
    F/Ns, he gives you his last cognition, and so on.
     
    Now the bank will remedy, will put out, the bank will put
    out the electrical phenomenon of disconnect a moment before
    the PC himself cognites on it. The meter reads just a small
    bit below the reality, or recognition, of the preclear. So
    that you normally get this odd phenomenon of the bank
    releases and then the PC says it. He finds out about it
    after you find out about it on the meter. So you have to
    make the marvelous adjudication of when to cut his comm.
    Because you do cut his comm. You must cut his comm.
     
    The trouble with the auditors that you see come in at Level
    0 at old Saint Hill courses and so on, you watch them on
    TV. It's the most agonizing thing you ever heard of. They
    ask this question and this fellow answers the question and
    he goes on and itsa's and itsa's, and the auditor's just
    not there! And he sits there, and the PC talks and talks
    and talks and talks and talks and talks and talks, and runs
    his havingness down, and pulls in mass. He's talking to
    him, and I get a hold of those guys when I'm training them
    and I said, "Control the session." "Well, control the session, I don't quite know what to do, that's all."
     
    A session consists of starting it, running it, and ending
    it. And intermediately begins with beginning, handling and
    completing a process. Then people won't have learned this,
    if they don't recognize they can control a session. They
    haven't found out this marvelous, marvelous fact. That you
    can control anybodys' bank better than they can below the
    level of clear.
     
    Anybody exterior to the bank can control bank far better
    than the guy who is inside. You can run him up and down the
    track, you can run him into things and out of things, and
    do ahh! And you get up around level 4, 5 OT section and so
    forth, you can make somebody scan himself all over the time
    track. Telepathically. Miles away.
     
    The auditor always has greater control of the PC bank than
    the PC does. Always! What do you mean you can't control the
    session? You can make the PC go wherever you want him to go.
     
    What are you waiting for? The auditor's cause.
     
    So the auditor tells him a process to run, and he's
    delivering self determinism into the hands of the PC, so
    having started him in that fine line he lets the PC do the
    recognition necessary to do the disconnect from the, his
    bank or the other persons' bank. The moment it disconnects
    his auditor has got to recognize the end of that cycle of
    action. Which is usually by the additional cognition of the
    PC. Cognition turns up usually right on the heels of the
    F/N. It starts to F/N and then you hear the cognition come out.
     
    And you've got to get the exact instant where you say
    "That's it." You run a PC just like you drive a car. The auditor is not an effect point. The auditor is a cause
    point which is bringing the PC up to cause point.
     
    So that's the mechanism. That's the mechanism of release.
    Well what the hell's the mechanism of clear?
     
    Well the mechanism of clear is he doesn't mock it up no
    more. He doesn't mock anything up anymore.
     
    Well now what happens after clear. Why do you go into
    anything after clear, then, if the guy... ? Well that would
    be great if there was just one thetan there. But there
    isn't Just one thetan there.
     
    Now you've got to get him on OT2 now to take enough charge
    off of the bank so he doesn't plow in when he hits 3,
    because he starts hitting these things on 3 all he's got to
    do is miss and the bank will go into a wing ding. The body
    thetans of the bank will go into a complete spinning,
    screaming mess. All you have to do is trip the wrong
    incident, run incident 2 before incident 1, get the PC
    wheeling and dealing and he'll go into a freewheel which
    could kill the PC. Could kill him. Nothing to monkey with.
     
    Therefore, he's now handled his own state, and his next
    action is to take enough charge with OT2 off the case, so
    that when he starts running these body thetans the
    handiest, most active body thetans have been discharged
    down to a point, because OT2 is part of R6.
     
    They're... they've been sneaked down. They won't freewheel
    as long as you run up from, up from incident 1 and incident
    2. If you run north of that, and all of OT2 is north of
    that, it's closer to PT, see? So you discharge it.
     
    And when you throw it into 3 he won't freewheel. That is to
    say he doesn't automatically start going through the
    composite group incident of all of these body thetans. Do
    you follow? There is nothing much to it, it, it's very
    simple. You, you take the, you take the jolt out of that
    portion of R6 with the materials of OT2, which would cause,
    by overcharge, it's too charged up, the composite mass of
    body thetans who all of a sudden start freewheeling through
    R6. 'Cause they've all been in R6 on this planet. The vast
    majority of them have.
     
    And then you can do 3. And you can do 3 very safely. But at
    the time you've done 3 remember that this character has now
    been plowing into body thetans. And he's started to wonder
    whether or not he isn't mocking something up because he's
    got a bunch of automatic pictures, and there's things
    mocking up against these things, and things, things, womp
    womp. And what he starts doing then is start copying their
    copies. They'll make copies of the physical universe and
    then he'll copy their copies and then he'll have the masses
    of body thetans. He'll make the copies of body thetan
    masses. And he's so damned used to having there things that
    he feels weird without any mass in, so he starts mocking up
    some mass. A lot of wild things can happen. But he blows
    these left, right and center, and then you rehab him. And
    then it all goes back quietly into place.
     
    Now, as you move on up the lines, you get to 7, you get to
    8, and you're taking away any slightest, faintest obsessive
    create that might exist. And you're taking away old
    obsessive postulatingness. And a lot of other odds and ends
    of little mechanisms that you may not have looked too
    closely in the teeth that are the woof and warp and
    composite of the thetan.
     
    Now. So what are your mechanisms of release? And what are
    the mechanisms of clearing? We know the individual is
    simply mocking it up himself. Well therefore it's very
    simple. All he'd have to do is cognite he's mocking it up
    himself and he'd go clear. There's nothing to that.
     
    Yeah, that's the trick man. He's got to cognite on it
    himself. You start telling him he is, and that's why you
    don't see that cognition put out as an end product. You
    start telling him that that is the end product and, god
    damn! I've seen several of them do it. They come around and
    say, "Well, bla bla and bla, everybody knows that I'm
    mocking it up myself. Yeah, I know I'm mocking it up
    myself." The guy's mad. You know, blaaaa. He looks like
    something a psychiatrist put out "Yeah, I know I'm mocking
    it up myself." And you say, "That's good. Do you have any pictures?", and so on. "Oh yeah, lots of pictures." "Are you mocking those up?" "No, no, those are automatic
    pictures." The cognition is being used as an evaluation.
    And you could actually prep check the cognition if it goes
    off too badly. That is, if he's mocking it up himself and
    you prep check him.
     
    Anyway, that'd be a very, very weird thing to do, but it
    could be done. You don't find very many cases in this
    state. You find quite a different, there's a different
    composite to this character. He didn't find any on 3. And
    you break out your little violin and you say, "It may be
    so, we do not know, your story sounds so queer. We hate
    like hell to doubt your word, but... it don't go here."
     
    The truth of the matter is the person has a this lifetime,
    severe physical injury which has jammed several body
    thetans together so that they don't answer up. They don't
    answer up and they're impacted, or pushed in, or all one.
    Severe physical crash, bang will cause an individual to
    find a very few or none at all. The remedy for it is run a
    this lifetime engram. Well, somebody's gonna say, "well
    why?" What do you tell him? But if you let the guy go out
    of this lifetime, why he's, he's running engrams of his own
    someplace or another that hasn't anything to do with his
    existing situation. His existing situation is a very simple
    situation where simply a lot of body thetans all think
    they're one body thetan, and that's the primary mistake
    body thetans make.
     
    And the proper cure for that, along with rehabs and getting
    in the lower grades, very often you find the lower grades
    madly out on such cases, as well as this. It's not always
    true, but you very often find them very badly out. And you
    move them up along the line, you find this lifetime
    injuries. This lifetime injuries or circumstances certainly
    which made engrams that pushed it all together, and then,
    then all of a sudden you can run 3. Run some of the
    phenomena of 3. You, you find this quite common. There is
    no such thing as somebody with no body thetans. Forget it.
    It doesn't exist. But you will find the lower grades are out.
     
    Now, this kind of phenomenon can exist, that doing the
    lower OT sections the guy blew a lot of body thetans. And
    then you can find that moment when he blew a lot of body
    thetans.
     
    Actually they all took off.
     
    But the common incident of body thetans is of course
    incident 1. The next common incident is incident 2.
    Incident 1 is the basic, but incident 2 is not necessarily
    true of every thetan because incident 2 doesn't, isn't in
    the bank of those thetans who were elsewhere. Who were
    elsewhere 75 million years ago. And there are a few of
    them. Also there were a few who were here who didn't get
    it. And so incident 2 is not that general. But it's
    sufficiently general that sometimes requires that.
     
    Now, incident 1 is that common incident of occurrence which
    tends to knit together all body thetans into the kooky idea
    they're all one. There is also another incident on the
    track which implants them to believe they're all one. And
    body thetans are not all one. Life is not all one by a long
    way. Life is composed of individuals. It requires a certain
    amount of effort to stay in the time stream at this period
    of time of this universe.
     
    Now, therefore, the mechanisms' release have to do with
    these factors. And at the lower grades the individual is so
    composited that he thinks he is one individual, and he very
    often hears little voices and so on, but he doesn't let
    this bother him too much. That's just natural. And as you
    come up the line, as you bring him up the line, why he of
    course gets closer and closer to this phenomenon. Very
    often on the Clearing Course, and so on, people will
    encounter body thetans and body thetans will start to blow.
    And you can't get into the OT sections without something
    happening about body thetans. I don't wish to be
    invalidative of anybody around hearing this who didn't find
    any. One of two things should've... one of two things should
    be done in such a case. His earlier auditing ought to be
    explored for blowing a lot of thetans. He may have occluded
    this. And the other one, if he still isn't flying on it,
    the other one is a severe injury in this lifetime, whereby
    the body thetans and he and the body are, have in common a
    savage physical experience of some kind or another which
    makes them all a group, and makes the group into one being.
    Those are the two actions which are taken in theory.
     
    But these are the mechanisms of release, and these are the
    mechanisms of clearing. Now those are the mechanisms you're
    handling, ant those are the things you're handling. And if
    you know those mechanisms well you can do an awful lot. You
    don't go squirreling around on the edges of it, because the
    thing which handles them is standard tech. And there isn't
    much else that handles them. And it handles them case after
    case, one person right after the other. It completely removes
    the differences between C/S's.
     
    There are no different cases. There are no cases different
    than any other cases. There aren't peculiar cases. But I
    can tell you this, I can tell you this, that a person who
    does not come up through the grades does not hit the
    phenomenon. He doesn't hit the release points of the upper
    grades if he hasn't been through the lower grades.
     
    For instance, if somebody didn't really go into 2, OT2,
    he's not likely to be able to come very close to 3. See? If
    he didn't go clear on the Clearing Course, why it's very
    unlikely he'll go anyplace else. If he didn't do his R6EW
    correctly he isn't likely to go clear. Do you follow? It's
    tracking back, tracking back.
     
    Question here, somebody asking somebody something or other
    a very complex question on the subject of going clear or
    not going clear, about rehab of Power after a person is
    clear. Now the law is you don't rehab Power after a person
    is clear. You do not do it. The reason you do not do it is
    the person all too often falls on his head. But the
    operative word here is what's got this person puzzled, is
    the word clear. If the person went clear on the Clearing
    Course and you rehabbed or indicated anything that was out
    on Power, or anything of that sort whatsoever, he would be
    in trouble at once. But the operative word is clear. A
    person who didn't go clear on the Clearing Course and
    didn't go release on R6EW probably has something wrong with
    his Power. And if there's nothing wrong with his Power he
    will go release on R6EW and clear on the Clearing Course.
    If he didn't go release on R6EW, if he gave a bunch of
    false attests and so forth, and didn't go clear on the
    Clearing Course, why then there is something wrong with his
    Power. But if his Power was alright he undoubtedly went
    release on R6EW, and undoubtedly went clear on the Clearing
    Course. I mean it's not a question that you wouldn't puzzle
    much about.
     
    So that if a person was on the Clearing Course and couldn't
    go clear you could of course go back and rehab the Power,
    because it isn't a clear, you know, I mean...  Simple. All
    of these things are very simple. They're all straight think.
     
    So, when you're trying to audit a case that doesn't want to
    be audited, he is stuck into some protest or resistance,
    and you make him as is it, and if you haven't at that
    moment put him on a meter you won't see the moment when it
    releases, and go on arguing with the guy because you're
    liable to be incensed. So it is an auditing session. He
    will go release on the subject and be auditable, and then
    walk himself right back into it and plow himself in again,
    unless you see that he went F/N on it.
     
    So you don't ever go along on the preconceived notion, this
    is another rule of standard tech, don't continue to hold
    the same idea of the persons' character. A C/S must never
    continue to hold his concept of the PC which was formed at
    some other level of the PCs case. And you will find that
    PCs get reputations. Well, everybody who was maintaining
    and keeping the PCs reputations up the line doesn't believe
    auditing works. So this PC was a complete dog when he was a
    Level 0, he just managed to get squeaked by it, and he
    would have required 18 dozen reviews, and he was just
    having an awful time, and so on, and then the case
    supervisor gets this PC when he gets up along the line to
    about Grade IV. And he right away, he will make one
    horrible mistake if he does not realize the person's
    released from that state, or he wouldn't have gotten to IV.
    So either the person was run to IV or the person was not
    run to IV. If the person is still this kind of a case, and
    is now a Grade IV, then god damn it nobody ever ran him up
    to Grade IV. Do you follow? So you do that by confirm or
    rehab his Grades up to IV.
     
    Now they will either rehab, or they've got to be run. And
    if they won't rehab then they've got to be run. Elementary.
    Sometimes you start to rehab some Grade like III, or
    something like that, and the TA starts up like mad. Well
    you have to make out what the hell that was. Probably III
    was overrun at the time, the moment of release was there,
    and now I'll give you a piece of stuff out of 7, in actual
    fact.
     
    It is not a standard action, but what happened was, is he
    was audited on that with his Ruds out. A piece out of 7 is
    you can get the Ruds in on any situation, anywhere in the
    past. That's a piece out of 7, that's not standard tech in
    repairs. But you can get the Ruds in on any action of the
    past, anytime. You can put all the sessions Ruds in on it.
     
    Now, it's very remarkable to see this occur. Because the
    thing will blow suddenly. Some former instance will blow,
    which was resistive in the past. In other words, the person
    was living with his Ruds out.
     
    Now the weird part of it is, is the reason for it wouldn't
    run, let us say something like that, at the time it was
    run, it's now giving you a rising TA and going bad and so
    on. You know that there are still some Ruds out on this
    case. And some auditor was kidding himself someplace.
     
    So what you have to do is fly the needle. And you make it
    your business to fly the needle.
     
    Now you go back and try to rehabilitate IV, and oddly
    enough it'll rehabilitate. Most mysterious thing you ever saw.
     
    Actually, if you noticed your own auditors' reports, you
    put Ruds in prior to the time IV was run. IV was run, let
    us say, in 1965. If you were running down a chain of ARC
    breaks you found one in 1959. When you found the ARC break
    in 1959 you took it out from underneath the running of IV
    in 1965. You actually put some Ruds in in the 1965 session,
    so it will now run or rehabilitate. If it doesn't
    rehabilitate, you can now run it. Most mysterious think you
    ever saw in your life. But you have to know this operative
    principle. You guys go around and start running some of the
    odd bits I tell you out of 7 and 8 and so on, you'll
    probably get your brains blown out. Not by me, but these
    are very, very rough levels. Ah, but I'll just give you
    some of the data. I know where the ceiling is now, exactly.
    You see at 8, and the retrospect of what goes together from
    that has to do with the repair of cases, the operation of
    the mind, and so forth.
     
    So I can tell you that this fellow is still stuck in having
    lost the battle of Waterloo. He was not Napoleon, he was
    the cavalry commander who ran all of that cavalry into the
    sunken road so that infantry could march across the top of
    it or something, bodies in there by the ton.
     
    Something like this. And you just can't seem to run this
    damned incident. He, he's got all these bodies stacked up
    there, just there and so on. Well one of the ways of
    freeing the whole thing up is put his rudiments in for that
    day. He'll blow. He had a missed withhold from Napoleon.
     
    This is not a procedure, not a procedure that is advised.
    I'm just telling you what can happen.
     
    So that you, just getting Ruds in, then always follow the
    only procedure for getting Ruds in.
     
    And there is no problems, solutions, counter-problems, what
    are the postulates, squirrel nonsense, upset,
    bleegle-bloggle, yik, yik, yik, to get in a PTP and missed
    withhold, or any of those. It is always continuously,
    always forever, only in standard tech that if it didn't
    clear you get the earlier similar one.
     
    Now if it didn't clear it was either an earlier similar
    one, or there was a false read. You don't, however, ask for
    another earlier ARC break. That is real crocky. That's
    asking the case to, whole case to run on ARC breaks,
    because you haven't said "similar". So you invite him off to the side panels that you're not trying to clear up. "You got an earlier ARC break?" Well that's really clown, that's really a clown question. Really clown. Because of course
    he's got an earlier ARC break. He actually has, by actual
    computation enough earlier ARC breaks to make the moon
    astronomical laboratory's computer go crazy. It couldn't
    write the number. YOU can always find an earlier ARC break,
    and if you don't know this principle then you will never
    get the Ruds in.
     
    So what have you got here? You've got an earlier similar
    incident or an earlier similar ARC break, or you have an
    earlier similar PTP. "Is there an earlier similar missed
    withhold?" Always, always, same chain, same chain. "PC, same chain please. Earlier please. Good. Thank you. Same
    chain, same chain, same chain, earlier please. Thank you."
     
    Now it's either an earlier incident on the same chain or
    it's a false read. somebody has said he had one when he
    didn't have, and it's continued to read. So you check for a
    false read, or you check for an earlier similar one. You
    don't always check for the false read because that would be
    a damn bore and a waste of time. That's why standard tech
    doesn't consist of rote procedures. When you put a nickel
    in the slot, then the record arm comes over, and goes down,
    zzzzzt, and, and then the record turns around and plays
    Methuselah Comes Again. You got to know what you're doing
     
    So, the PC you say, "Do you have an ARC break?" You know? "Do you have an ARC break?" Somebody's asking me for the exact question by which you ask for an ARC break. I'm going
    to have him write me an assortment of questions by which
    you ask for an ARC break, as a system. Not to punish him,
    but to show him that the principle of asking for an ARC
    break is what we're talking about, not the English
    language. The principle. The principle.
     
    You ask some five year old kid for an ARC break who never
    heard of the term ARC break, you're liable to get a read on
    misunderstood, and then you've had it. Right? You have to
    know what is this question ARC break. You have to be able
    to say, "Upset? Is there an upset with communication?" You know? or, "An upset with your affections for people?", or, you got to know what you're doing so you can talk it. That
    isn't driving you off the line of standard tech.
     
    You're asking, "Do you have An ARC break?" And it reads, and the PC looks. At that moment you say, "Has anyone ever
    said you had an ARC break when you didn't?" "Yes, ah ha ha, yeah ha of yeah oh. One time. One time this auditor... still
    he always asked for an ARC break and I couldn't clear this
    ARC break. And I used to think Scientology didn't work
    because I could never clear up this ARC break. And I'd keep
    telling him about the ARC break. And he kept auditing, and
    never, and babbaababa." Wooom. Boom. "I Just realized that I didn't have an ARC break with Joe." And you say, "Good. Thank you. We will now run Grade II." Your actual action
    is, "Your needle is floating. Thank you very much. We will
    now run II." Alright. Now, the PC said, "Ohhh. You got a read on PTP, huh?" (sigh) Well honest to god it's damn near that exaggerated. How the hell I have to tell an auditor
    that it must be a false read someplace just testifies that
    the auditor who's reading this kind of thing doesn't know
    what the hell it is. It's an evaluation. The question is an
    evaluation of some time in the past. Somebody has said, you
    know. Now the reverse happens, but only once in a blue
    moon. This is once in a blue moon that the reverse can
    happen. "Well, do you have a present time problem? Well
    that's clean." "That's funny." "Why? ""Well, I was sitting here worrying about my wife.' "Alright, on that question
    has anything been suppressed?" "Oh yeah, well I've always had to suppress this problem, and so forth, it's always
    been a terrific worry to me. I've been suppressing it for
    years. ""Well good enough. Alright, anything been
    suppressed? That's clean. Alright. Do you have a present
    time problem?" "No." People have invalidated the fact that he had a present time problem. Some auditor has actually
    gone so far as maybe to ball him out for having a present
    time problem. There's two sides of it. And one is eval and
    one is inval.
     
    So the eval/inval always occurs, but it has different
    workings. You have to know eval/inval.
     
    Well false read, false read. Now you could actually have a
    situation where, "Have you never had, have you ever had a
    no-read on this when you did have?" "Oh yeah, lots of
    times." You can get that reverse situation.
     
    So the net result of this is, is you run it back to an
    earlier similar, similar situation, you all of a sudden get
    behind in time the zone or area where he was audited
    without Ruds, and the area will now rehab. So that's why
    you always fly a needle. You've done it. Now after you've
    flown the needle on Ruds, what the hell are you doing
    trying to fly the needle on Ruds? If you fly a kite, you've
    flown a kite. If the needle is floating it is floating.
    There isn't anything else you can do that gets it floating.
    But you're on the subject line. You're on a subject line.
    And you can float a needle on any specific zone of action.
     
    How is it you can fly a needle on the three questions of
    5A, one right after the other? Getting it broader and
    broader and broader? Well, they're on three different,
    primary points of thetan interest. But they're three
    different points of interest.
     
    Now let's get, let's do five S and Ds in a row. I don't
    care with what question. And the PC collapses. Why? It's
    all on the same subject; him being suppressed. Him being
    suppressed or suppressing somebody, it's on the subject of
    suppression. And it's Just like asking the question, "Has
    anything been suppressed?", getting a floating needle, and
    then saying, "Good.
     
    Has anything been suppressed?"
     
    Now, what happens? The exact mechanism. Let's look at the
    exact mechanism here. "Has anything been suppressed?"
    Floating needle. Now you say, what has happened here now,
    he's stopped thinking the thought which has kept him
    connected to, or kept him making up a certain mass. Now
    he's stopped thinking that thought for a moment, because
    he's got it gone or it's in view or he's stated it, and now
    you ask the question again. You have now told him that he
    has not thought the thought which disconnected him, so he
    now goes and looks for a thought to think that will
    disconnect him. And, doing that, he reconnects himself. And
    the more you do this, the higher the TA goes because the
    more mass he makes up trying to find something to find... ,
    trying to make something to find something in. You got it?
    So this kind of a sequence has begun.
     
    So every time you overrun you put him back in to doing it
    again. Because you've invalidated that he has stopped doing it.
     
    How long will a person stay a release? A person'll stay
    released until such time as he overruns it. If you cut the
    PCs comm, what the hell is he gonna do? The needle floats,
    he's about to tell you "I just remembered I killed my
    mother-in-law", you know, something like that. And you, he
    said, "Gee! I... " Needle floats. You say, "That's it!" You haven't got the end of process phenomena hooked up with the
    floating needle, hooked up with the general thing, see? And
    you know what the PC does? He says, "Duh, dih, OK.. Yeah." And he goes onto the, the next subject, but it doesn't
    float so well, and so on, and then he goes out. And every
    friend he's got he gets rid of this thought. "You know,
    funny thing in this session, session I just had in there,
    funny thing. I, I just said I'd occluded it totally. I
    killed my mother-in-law. You know? Occluded it." And he'll
    tell Joe and Bill and Pete and Oscar and Mazie, and so on
    and so on.
     
    How often, how long do you think this thing is going to
    stand up? It's gonna overrun, and very quickly. Because you
    didn't let him finish the corm cycle. But how long is the
    comm cycle? Well, the comm cycle is as long as it's
    necessary to immediately get rid of that exact realization.
    And that is the exact length of the comm cycle. And it is
    not so many inches on an auditors' report. And how long is
    that? Well it's just as long as it lists. A list is a list
    as long as it has the item on it. How long is a piece of
    string? A piece of string is as long as, from the distance
    from one end to the other end, and it is the middle part of
    the string and that is the length of the string. Got it?
     
    Well when I see, as a case supervisor, one and one half
    columns of cognition after the F/N, I know the auditor has
    just about as much control over this session as he has of
    the evolutions of Pluto. See, no control. No control on the
    session. He also has no judgment with regard to a finish of
    a comm cycle. Also his meter reading is out. Also, also,
    also, also. So, I, I come down on it. So the auditor who
    chops the comm is gonna get the F/N overrun right away, as
    soon as the session has ended. And the auditor who overruns
    it has already overrun it, and sort of invalidated it, and
    you'll see that an auditor can invite itsa.
     
    One of the ways an auditor invites itsa is to be silent. A
    person says, "My gods I just remembered, ha ha. Ha ha,
    never remembered it before, I never remembered it before. I
    killed my mother-in-law. Ha ha, what do you know? God,
    that's funny. Occluded the whole thing.
     
    Yeah. I occluded the whole thing. Ah, yeah. "The auditor's
    sitting there, the auditor's sitting there...  Now the PC
    for sure got to explain why this is important, why this is
    a cognition. So the auditor didn't acknowledge it, that's
    all and he didn't acknowledge it with his face, or his
    voice, or any other damn thing. See? He didn't acknowledge
    it. And so he'll get an overrun.
     
    So, when you see a column and a half after the F/N
    explaining why it is all, you know that the auditors TRs
    are out, and you look. Similarly, you know when he cuts the
    PCs comm, the PC has got an F/N but there's no statement.
    Well either the auditor's admin is out, or he...
    (laughter). So you see the case supervisor knows all. The
    sensitivity to the cycle of action, the sensitivity to the
    cycle of action.
     
    Now, you've got a problem then, in the administration of
    the process over and beyond the actual asking of auditing
    questions. You've got the administration, and you see the
    administration before you in the folder, and, was it really
    delivered? So the case supervisor is always operating
    against the question mark of the auditors' TRs. Were the
    auditors' TRs good? Did the auditor actually give a good
    session presence? Because actually, a bad auditor session
    presence can make an apparent gain not be a gain. The out
    TRs didn't actually end the cycle of action, they overran
    it or under ran it, and it may be that the auditor was just
    too lazy to write it down, or the auditor wrote it down
    falsely, or the auditor copied his report afterwards to
    make it look good, or something like that. So as case
    supervisor you always have an unlimited number of very low
    conditions for any falsification, abbreviation, or
    otherwise, on an auditing report.
     
    The falsification or misrepresentation on an auditing
    report then becomes a deathly, deadly sin.
     
    Because it denies the case supervisor the information
    necessary to handle the case. And you, if you are out there
    case supervising, and you have a level, grade, Class II
    auditor, something like this, and this Class II auditor is
    busy auditing PCs in an HGC, you're going to think right
    away that it's absolutely vital that we train him up in the
    entirety of Class VIII before we let him audit anybody, oh
    my god, he ought to be strangled, look how bad it is. And
    you go over to the academy and you try to get them to teach
    a Class VIII course, and so forth, and the guy doesn't even
    know the name of the subject yet. He's got no body of
    information to correct or go through or anything else. He's
    just ignorant. So, you are very careful about what PCs he
    audits. And you'll find out that it's quite remarkable the
    gains he will get, and you in your case supervision can
    guide him right straight back onto the straight and narrow.
    You can. You can train him up so he does it. Now you
    probably need your nickel in the slot, the record reaches
    over, the arm goes over and presses this needle on and a
    tune runs off.
     
    But the best thing you do with a case like this is, yeah,
    as fast as possible, you get him on up through, and you get
    him through the whole body of information on a Class VI
    course, and you push him up through, and you get yourself a
    Class VIII. But you can't in actual fact, in a fortnight
    make Class VIII auditors out of all these guys. But you
    sure as hell can make it an awful deadly, deadly, deadly,
    deadly, deadly sin for him to make any false statement, or
    any alteration on an auditors' report. And that's the thing
    which you have to teach him, not the Class VIII course.
     
    You say, "We're very glad to have you auditing in the HGC.
    There's only one thing you should know about auditing in
    the HGC. This is the form of the session, this is how a
    session is written down. Any variation from this or any
    falsification of session data, and so forth, and you're
    hanged. Otherwise than that we're friends. This is the high
    crime. This is the high crime around here." Because that is the one thing that a case supervisor can't do too much about.
     
    Now he knows it has happened when his PC turns up in
    review, and he's sick, and when he turns up in a big ethics
    order. So a case supervisor always watches the review
    requests and the ethics orders. Then he can judge the
    quality of the auditing which is being delivered. And he
    can go back and find out those sessions which have been
    falsely reported.
     
    Now, the basis of auditing, the basis of auditing is this
    basic mechanism about the mind. The key out, the key out,
    he stops making it for now. He disconnects from the being
    who is making it for now. That's a release. He might think
    it again, or something like that, and then he's gonna do it
    again. He won't do it as seriously. The bulk of the charge
    on it has gone, so it won't be as serious as before, but he
    can key in. So the mechanism of key out and key in is
    everything you're handling up to R6EW. Then he has the
    cognition that he's making it, and then you only have to
    worry about other things making things. And then that's
    handled on 2 by taking charge off, and then on 3.
     
    Now when he finally gets around to what the think is, and
    how come he does this in the first place, and so forth,
    you're in the zone of OT8. OT8 is the total explanation of
    why? How come? What's it all about? And the beginning of
    the line is, the beginning of the line is, that they are
    not all built the same way. Some are two peanut whistle,
    some are 44,000 horsepower. Thetans are not all of the same
    strength. And they're not equal and they're not all the
    same being, and there's thetans who would really sweat at
    it to run one foot of a grasshopper, and other thetans that
    couldn't possibly scale themselves down to leaving the
    Empire State building standing if they leaned on it.
    Different sizes, for some peculiar reason.
     
    What would be more peculiar is if they were all the same
    horsepower and the same size.
     
    But the net result of all of this is, is they're all pretty
    strong, actually, when you get them to straighten out. And
    it begins at the lowest level, with the same thing that it
    ends with at the highest level. You're auditing the same
    being, or collection of beings, except at the highest level
    you're starting to audit the dynamics, and then you audit
    it back, so that an individual is an individual, despite
    the dynamics, and so forth. The same guy, from the bird who
    comes in to the session and he says to you, "I don't want
    to be processed." He says it with a look, and otherwise.
    Now that's the thought. And what you're trying to do is
    disconnect that thought, so that he can be processed.
     
    So you audit him very smoothly from there on out, and he
    doesn't think the thought again "I don't want to be
    processed." So he goes right on up through the roof, very
    nicely and very smoothly. And he's just the same as every
    other thetan. He might have a different horsepower, and he
    may have different companions in his skull. But he operates
    the same way, and he responds to the same laws, and there
    is no difference. There is no difference, there is no,
    definitely no difference, in his reactions. And that is the
    thing, basically, which you're handling. The guy is
    thinking a thought which mocks up, or he's mocking up
    something, he's mocking up something and thinking a
    thought. And when you clip the thing which makes him stop
    doing that, without at the same time stopping him, on his
    own volition that is to say in answering the question, then
    at that moment you get a floating needle. It's making him
    think the right thought to disconnect. Very simple. That's
    standard tech. And it runs all the way up.
     
    Now you think then there are millions of ways to do that.
    Surprise, surprise, surprise. I don't think there are fifty
    techniques. I don't think there are fifty processes. Fifty
    would be stating it very largely. I haven't counted them. I
    haven't counted them.
     
    The processes are the same all the way from rehab of former
    states of release to somebody who has never been audited,
    straight on through to OT8. Nowhere along the line is there
    a different technology employed. And it doesn't amount to
    fifty processes. It just has different targets.
     
    The targets shift, the processes are differently worded,
    the action is uniform. You're doing the same thing all the
    way. You bring him up to a point of where he knows he was
    mocking it up, and doesn't mock it up until he mocks it up
    and says he's mocking it up.
     
    You begin at an unawareness. He is totally unaware of the
    fact that he is mocking it up, and you disconnect him from
    mocking it up at that moment. And he isn't even aware of
    that. He just knows he feels good. And then it's just up
    and up and up, until he gets to the Clearing Course. You've
    brought him up enough stair steps, until he becomes aware
    of the fact that he is or isn't mocking it up, and this
    time it's the whole bank. He says, "What the hell? I'm
    mocking the whole thing up. Huh. What do you know."
     
    Alright. From that point on he is not really yet aware of
    the fact that there are other things around mocking it up.
    And not being aware that other things are around mocking it
    up he can get into many puzzles. He sometimes goes out of
    his head, he thinks I'll go pick up another body," he
    thinks this, he thinks that, he thinks something else. And
    he's liable to get into very severe trouble picking up
    another body, because there're all kinds of things being
    mocked up in that body. Anywhere he looks something's going
    to be mocked up. So he's going to get into a hell of a
    puzzle unless he goes up through the remaining OT sections.
     
    And then when he gets clear on up to the top and he's
    beautiful, he's all straightened out, boy is he straight,
    wow. He can steer it, not too well, but he can steer it.
    And then he has to handle the, the subject of think. Not
    mocking up, but the subject of think. What is he thinking?
    What... something happens and he thinks. Well that's, you
    know? It's the reactive think that you're handling then.
    But anyhow, you'll see that when you get to it.
     
    Anyway I just wanted to tell you. This is the same band and
    it goes from the guy who doesn't even want to be audited up
    to the guy who's as free as a bird and uses the Empire
    State building to pick his teeth. Same set of processes,
    same standard tech, and we got it all, and therefore, I am
    inviting you, kindly, persuasively, gently, ferociously to
    use it. And to understand it and not go off the edge of it
    into the never-never land that connects him all up again.
    Thank you.
     
    **************
    
     

    Track this thread for me

    Subscribe to alt.religion.scientology
    Mail this message to a friend
    View original Usenet format
    Post Reply

    << Previous in search   ·   Next in search >>

    Search Discussions
      For a more detailed search go to Power Search
    Search only in: People >> Humanities >> Theology
    All Deja.com
    Search for:
    Search  messages

     Arts & Entertainment   Automotive   Computing & Tech   Health   Money 
     News   People   Recreation   Sports   Travel 
    SHOPPING - Yellow Pages - Long Distance Deals - Free Stuff - Trade with Datek - Go to Gigabuys! - GET IT NOW @ NECX - FREE downloads! - Get FREE Health Info@drkoop.com - Apartments.com - eBay Auctions

    Copyright © 1999 Deja.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Trademarks · Terms & Conditions of Use · Site Privacy Statement.

    Advertise with Us!  |  About Deja.com