deja.com
Click here for fatbrain.com
Click here for fatbrain.com
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
 Home  »  People  »  Humanities
 >>  Theology 
fz bible 19/19
Explore More:

Classifieds
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

Price Comparison
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

5¢ long distance!
Save $$$$$.

The Best of ZDNet
Delivered to you free!

Earth's Biggest Selection
Shop at Amazon.com

The Ultimate Directory
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

Rate it!
Sinbad
or choose another to rate
(1=worst, 5=best)
Funniness
15
Delivery
15
Originality
15
Persona
15

  • Compare it to others
  • User Comments
     
  • top rated
    Comedians
    1. Steven Wright
    2. George Carlin
    3. Eddie Izzard
    4. Chris Rock
    5. Denis Leary
  • See the full list...
  • Deja Forums
    Atheism
    Atheism
    Atheism
    Satirical atheism
    Atheism
     
    Deja Communities
    DOGS WORKING, SAR, Obedience,
    THE WOLVES DEN
    Doggie Club
    Need help with a baby name?
    FAMILY 2000

    Start your own community in Theology.  

    My Deja
    Get more out of Deja: Register to easily manage your discussions and communities, and improve your searches. Plus, get email alerts about new posts in your favorite discussions with Deja Tracker!
     
      discussions     ratings     communities  
      back to search results 
    Help | Feedback
    >> Community
    Next in Search
       >> Forum: alt.religion.scientology
          >> Thread: FZ Bible 19/19 CLASS 8 TAPES
            >> Message 1 of 20
     
    Subject:FZ Bible 19/19 CLASS 8 TAPES
    Date:1999/07/03
    Author:Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
      Posting History Post Reply

    FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
     
    CLASS VIII TAPE TRANSCRIPTS 19/19
     
    **************************************************
     
    CLASS VIII TAPE TRANSCRIPTS - CONTENTS
     
    01  SEP 24, 1969 WELCOME TO THE CLASS VIII COURSE
    02  SEP 25, 1969 WHAT STANDARD TECH DOES
    03  SEP 26, 1969 THE LAWS OF CASE SUPERVISION
    04  SEP 27, 1969 STANDARD TECH DEFINED
    05  SEP 28, 1969 THE STANDARD GREEN FORM AND RUDIMENTS
    06  SEP 29, 1969 MECHANICS OF TECHNIQUES AND SUBJECT MATTER
    07  SEP 30, 1969 CASE SUPERVISOR DO'S AND DONT'S:
    08  OCT  1, 1969 CERTAINTY OF STANDARD TECH
    09  OCT  2, 1969 THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING
    10  OCT  3, 1969 ASSISTS
    11  OCT  7, 1969 ASSESSMENT AND LISTING BASICS
    12  OCT  8, 1969 MORE ON BASICS
    13  OCT  9, 1969 ETHICS AND CASE SUPERVISION
    14  OCT 10, 1969 AUDITOR ATTITUDE AND THE BANK
    15  OCT 11, 1969 AUDITORS ADDITIVES, LISTS AND CASE SUPERVISION
    16  OCT 12, 1969 STANDARD TECH
    17  OCT 13, 1969 THE BASICS AND SIMPLICITY OF STANDARD TECH
    18  OCT 14, 1969 THE NEW AUDITOR'S CODE
    19  OCT 15, 1969 AN EVALUATION OF EXAMINATION ANSWERS
     
     
    **************************************************
     
    STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
     
    Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
    Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
     
    The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
    Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
    copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
     
    They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians,
    Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
     
    The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
    of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
     
    We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
    to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
     
    But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
    the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
    testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 
     
    We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
    as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
    without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
     
    We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
    not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
    that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
    to aid us for that reason.
     
    Thank You,
     
    The FZ Bible Association
     
    **************************************************
     
    6810C15 Class VIII TAPE 19
     
    AN EVALUATION OF EXAMINATION ANSWERS AND DATA ON
    STANDARD TECH
     
    Thank you. Thank you. We have come to the end of the trip.
    That sounds very bad in some connotations. Now, you
    probably want to know what you got wrong on the
    examination. The examination is what processes do you use
    on the green form. Well for some reason or another you
    characters have forgotten that you can have, and have
    issued, and have done green forms.
     
    It is the ordinary Qual action. Now the reason why this was
    not hit hard in this course, is that so many green forms
    had already been handed out amongst the students that we
    did not heavily use green forms.
     
    The best thing you can do with a green form is to itsa,
    earlier itsa. That's the best thing you can do with it. And
    out of that you could even omit ARCU, CDEI, if the guy
    didn't even know what he was doing on that. Just itsa,
    earlier itsa. Do you follow?
     
    You can run ARC breaks with this. So, an auditor, you could
    train an auditor to use a green form rather easily if he
    could recognize an F/N, and knew enough to get an earlier
    incident.
     
    But a green form. Apparently your answers on a green form
    were very poor. Now it takes a rather skilled auditor to
    run listing and nulling, so you tend to minimize that. And
    you tend to minimize that, but when environment reads on a
    green form, the proper thing, the actual proper thing to
    call for if your auditor is skilled, is a remedy B. When
    you get a continuous present time overts reading, the best
    thing on that is the listing and nulling question, which is
    actually of the family of S and D questions. It's one of
    those very good questions. Is, "What are you trying to
    prevent?" And that is what you use to handle continuous
    present time overts.
     
    Now an S and D reads if the person is connected to a
    suppressive person or group. And you would do an S and D.
    And the S and D, of course, is done on WSU, an assessment
    of which S and D is required, and if you start doing too
    many S and Ds on a case all it does is invalidate the last
    S and D. But you can run one of each kind. There's an F/N
    available on W. which is withdraw, there's an F/N available
    on stop, there's an F/N available on unmock. So there're
    actually three types of S and Ds that can be run. You
    wouldn't even bother much to clarify that, but beyond
    saving that if a person has been run on a withdraw S and D,
    then it should not he run.
     
    I don't know if you could get, if you realize this, but
    your recall or remember being blank, is a sort of an S and D
    all by itself on your LX-1. That type of list.
     
    Now there's several of these types of lists, by the way,
    just as a notation here. There's several of these types of
    lists. They're all handled the same way. Don't all of a
    sudden believe that they are something brand new and
    wonderful and strange. For instances the Money Course
    people are giving all over the place, is just one of these
    L-list. It would be handled exactly the same way. Run the
    motivator engram, run the overt engram, and the thing would
    be in actual fact, just those things associated with money.
    And it'd simply be a list of these things associated with
    money, gives the person a prepared list, it's already
    prepared, it's issued, it's not changed, not added to. And
    it's simply assessed, and you do a recall or remember, and
    so forth on that. Just filling you in on a little bit of
    data here. The lists have not at this moment been prepared.
    And as a result, I didn't give them to you.
     
    But your LX-1, your LX-1 is simply the pattern. That is,
    the pattern. The other pattern, the LX-1 is the pattern by
    which you run a recall, get an F/N, run a motivator chain
    of engrams or secondaries, get an F/N. You can get an F/N
    from secondaries, and you'd get an F/N from engrams.
    overts, secondaries, you can get an F/N for overts,
    secondaries. You can get an overt for F/N engrams. And that
    is one pattern.
     
    Another pattern of action is you assess this little
    prepared list. A very simple little list. And you can do,
    for something like auditing or something like that, you can
    do the L-1 on the result of this little prepared list, or
    you can prep check it.
     
    These are all of a family of actions. They actually can be
    addressed to anything. I just saw about a, I don't know.
    Must be a twenty page auditing report on a prep check of
    what you have been going over, called, you know, they make
    a list like, "Auditing, auditors", you know, so and so, so and so. That little list. And then prep check it. And that
    little list, all by its' little lonesome, produced twenty
    pages worth of session, on a case that has been a kind of a
    no-case gain case, and all that sort of thing. But that's
    all by itself, you see? Now actually you can prepcheck
    floating needles. You can do all that sort of thing. But
    this is all outside the zone of green form. You don't
    discover these things on a green form. These are the things
    which a case supervisor adds up as necessary on the case,
    and he puts the thing together. Now when you send somebody
    over for a green form, over to Qual, your ordinary action
    would be something on the order of omit lists. You haven't
    got any security in your auditing, your lists. And they've
    done too damn many lists already. So just omit lists, do
    the green form, itsa, earlier itsa. And you'll just be
    surprised what these characters can run into on this.
     
    So, you apparently forgot the green form. And that is
    Quals' chief weapon. Now one of the things about the green
    form is people mustn't send people to Qual to get a
    disagreements check, to get a sec check, to get a bop bop
    bop bow bow. People cannot dictate what happens in Qual
    except the case supervisor. Do you see? So that executives
    throughout an organization can send their staff in for
    anything they please, as long as it isn't done.
     
    This also follows on into the field of the ARC break
    registrar. It's very unfortunate that it is known as the
    ARC break registrar, because what they ought to be doing on
    those people is a green form. And what they ought to be
    using is itsa, earlier itsa. That's all they ought to be
    doing on the whole ARC break program, the ARC break
    registrar, the ARC break auditor.
     
    That's all they ought to be specializing in. Because it's
    very safe. Very safe. And if you omit lists off of it
    you've got an unlimited run. It really doesn't matter how
    often or how long you go on this sort of thing.
     
    But I didn't issue these green forms to you for the reason
    that anybody can do a green form.
     
    It's very simple. I've taught you some very standard
    actions. Now remember, when you've been putting in the
    Ruds, exactly the same action you use in putting in the
    Ruds is what you use in handling a green form. Except it
    ceases to be what is just in the rudiments, and it becomes
    the whole green form goes that way.
     
    Now, this has, you had another one here. What does setting
    up a case mean? And apparently you missed this left, right
    and center. And some of you undoubtedly got it, but it was
    a common miss. It was question 246. You fly the Ruds or
    green form to F/N before starting a major action. And
    brother, you better remember that. 'Cause if you missed
    that on the examination, man, wow, you're going to have
    trouble. We had somebody just a day or two ago in auditing
    do the unforgivable thing. The guy had a somatic so they
    thought they'd put the full four rundown through. They're
    gonna handle a lousy little PT somatic with a full four
    rundown. Why that somatic ought to have been handled and
    everything ought to have been handled on the case. They guy
    was set up to go. Don't you see? And so, setting up a case
    is, you fly the Ruds or green form to F/N before starting a
    major action, and that, you wouldn't attempt any major
    action on a case. Don't attempt a major action on a case
    that apparently has something wrong with it. Handle
    whatever is wrong with it before you attempt a major action.
     
    And if I can give you that the case'll fly.
     
    You're handling a guy who is dead in his head or stuck here
    on earth, or something like this.
     
    The major actions of a case are to fly this thetan. I don't
    know. I might even go so far as to have somebody who is
    having consistent tonsillitis and lumbosis and bog-woggus,
    and that sort of thing, make him get himself straightened out
    medically before I'd touch him. Yeah, the case is obviously
    going to get audited with all the grades to cure his god
    damn tonsillitis.
     
    Now the difference of viewpoint is, is you really shouldn't
    give a damn what shape the body is in as long as it does
    not deter the PC from flying. So your Ruds, and your little
    green forms, and your actions of this character, and how
    you set these cases up, you set the case up before you
    attempt a major action. And you're going to have terrific
    wins. Because the major action is for something else. It's
    to fly the guy. Not to handle his ingrown toenails. Do you
    see that? So I'm clarifying it here, because it possibly
    wasn't clear.
     
    Question number 247, how do you set up a case? There is no
    consistency on this. There, some said just Ruds, some
    didn't mention F/N. Hardly any mentioned a green form.
    Others went into more complex action of setting up a case,
    such as running engram chains and that sort of thing. But,
    you set up a case with Ruds or green form to F/N, or list
    1, or list 4. But you set up the case somehow. See? You
    can, you can go into more complex actions. Yes, that's very
    true.
     
    You can run engram chains. You can do this, you can do that
    and the other thing, see? But where you haven't set up the
    case you throw away the major action. And when you've
    thrown away the major action you've got no place to go. So
    you set up the case. You don't run somebody with a
    constant, persistent present time problem on a major action
    like grades. Don't say, "Well it'll all be handled when we
    do problems." Bunk! Problems are addressed more or less to
    the whole track.
     
    I had somebody the other day, had somebody the other day
    run on the grades, and all that handled was her present
    time problems as a messenger. See, that was a flunk. That's
    a throw away of the whole line of grades, because in actual
    fact, the present time problem wasn't really straightened
    out on the case. You want this person to look at life. See?
    We want him to look all around and we want him examine his
    track and we want him to fly on this stuff. So this, this
    you've got to get. Because it's the very guts of modern
    auditing.
     
    Alright, and question 250. Is "Explain the mechanism of
    release, and at which point you get an F/N." The F/N occurs when the PC disconnects from the mass. That's a release.
    When he disconnects from the mass, that's a release. Oddly
    enough, it translates through to the person that when he,
    for instance was in prison, and they let him out, that'll
    read as a release too.
     
    Which is perfectly OK. Cause it was a release from the
    mass. Do you understand? But it's a release from the mass.
    And the comment here on the case, these, not my comments
    but the people who corrected the examinations, quite a few
    amazingly had this wrong. And for some reason had it
    confused with other thetan pictures. And some even said
    it's when you create the mass. I wouldn't know how you got
    that wrong.
     
    If it's too, the trouble with it is, it's too damn simple.
    It's too simple. That's what's wrong.
     
    It's actually almost impossible to complicate the answer.
    So I'll give you the answer very bluntly. Here is a mass.
    When you take the thetan out of it, it's a release. When
    you erase the mass and leave the thetan there, it's an
    erasure. And there is no other complexity to it. Pleased
    That's all there is. That's all there is. There isn't any
    other complexity to it whatsoever.
     
    I'll go over it again. There's a mass. Any old damn mass.
    Mental mass, prison, cat fights.
     
    Alright. The mass. Alright. Here's a thetan. He's stuck in
    this thing, see? And he's saying, "I'm not happy. I get
    yowl all the time. You know? I yowl. I keep seeing these
    bars in front of my face. Yap yap yap yap yap. Complain,
    complain, complain, complain, complain. Why is he
    complaining? 'Cause he's stuck in a mass. He's out of time,
    he's in a mass, and so forth. You come along, you audit
    him, you go poof! Do you see? This, oddly enough, will drop
    out of sight. And he'll say, "Whee!" That's a release.
     
    Alright. Now, we've got another action. And here he is,
    stuck in prison. He's really stuck. 199 years to go. And we
    come along and we erase this. The engram he's stuck in. The
    mass he's stuck in. We get it as-ised. It doesn't
    disappear. It's gone. Gone. It ain't never gonna come back
    no more. And that's an erasure.
     
    Only two actions. He gets out of the car, or you scrub the
    car. That's all there is to it. You try to make anything
    else out of it, and boy, you gonna go around in circles.
    Sure we know he makes up the mass. Sure, we know all kinds
    of complications. Sure, we know that the mechanics of
    electricity show that ohms, volts often resist. Yes, we
    could probably fix up slide rules that would tell us the
    exact density of the release he's stuck on, and I imagine
    somewhere up the track if I don't keep my eye on it some
    damn fool will do this! But that's all there is to it.
     
    He gets out of the car or you erase the car.
     
    In either way he's rid of the car. But if he just gets out
    of the car he's still got a car somewhere.
     
    If you erase the car he isn't ever gonna have any more
    trouble with that car, because it's gone.
     
    We don't care that he mocked up the car in the first place,
    he usually hasn't found this out. And very often he's so
    disowned something he has mocked up that it appears to be
    something somebody else mocked up. And sometimes it is
    something somebody else mocked up. Who is right there that
    moment looking down his throat. But we don't care what the
    hell! I don't know why you worry about where the hell the
    mass came from at the stage of defining release. Who cares
    where the mass came from? It is. And you can take him out
    of it, or you can erase it. You got it?
     
    Brother, that's all there is to it. Wow, wow, wow.
     
    Now you could exteriorize and get him out of the body, and
    then you can get complexities like that. You can
    exteriorize him, and get him out of the body only he took
    the mass with him. So he complains that it really wasn't a
    release, 'cause he didn't think he was stuck in the body,
    he thought he was stuck in some mass. It's what he thinks
    he's stuck in. It isn't his idea. He's really stuck in it -
    Like, like fly paper. But you can do those two actions and
    they're entirely different.
     
    Now, here's another one - "What is the matter, and how do
    you handle someone who found 'none' on three?" And I got one on you guys. You never checked out on your study materials
    at an AO on 3. You never did - You never did, and by god,
    from the lesson I've had here, you know what I'm gonna do?
    Dey gonna give star rate checkouts before dey ever get 3-
    And that's going on right now. Going on right now. That was
    telexed to them yesterday. They study it and study it and
    study it, and they can call it name, rank, serial number,
    everything else. Whether they can confront it or not we
    don't give a damn. And then we fly the Ruds, and let them
    go at 3. And of course when they fly the Ruds they go F/N,
    they say, "It's all gone." We say, "Very good. It's all gone. That's great. You didn't find any?" "Oh, no, no. I never had any. I'm peculiar. I'm one of those people whose
    feet never stick. I was actually born in the universe as a
    free being, and I am still a free being. This stuff
    crawling on me is simply a rumor." And at that moment we
    will fly a rud, run incident II, capture to pilot, find
    some engram incident I's, and run them. And the funny part
    of it is, is you know sometimes this happened? It sometimes
    has happened that after we've done this once or twice the
    guy all of a sudden wakes up. And he says, "Hey, you know?
    There's a lot of these, hahaheheeheehoo."
     
    We say, "Here's your study materials and your pack again.
    Guess you go back to the old salt mines, boy." You understand?
     
    Now we're not trying to invalidate his 3, we're not trying
    to get him to audit 3 forever, or anything like that. But
    he ought to be reasonable clear of fleas. So we don't have
    to use through the following OT sections flea powder on him
    every few minutes. And the reason for OT section failure is
    a failure, not to audit 3, but a failure to check out the
    materials of 3. The most abysmal ignorance you ever heard
    of seems to exist on this subject. I don't know why - Maybe
    a body thetan reads it. (Laughter.)
     
    So you're going to find a lot of these cats, and the thing
    to do is to pat them on the back, and say, "Cheers." And not evaluate for him and tell him it's an unflat 3. Throw
    him into session, run an incident II capture to pilot, run
    him back, run some incident I's, and then they either don't
    have any more or they do. See? It's an open and shut
    proposition. If you can't clear it up in a review session
    they've got more. If you can clear it up in a review
    session, that's it. Do you follow? And they're going to
    have to do it all over again at 7 anyhow. It isn't that they
    departed. It's that there's other phenomenon of a case at
    7, almost as startling as that of 3. And if you make them
    go back and audit 3 too often and too many times, and so
    on, you'll start running into phenomena of 7. And then the
    guy sort of gets plowed in and doesn't know where the hell
    he's going or coming, boy. And he can really get chewed in.
    But the way you'd straighten it out, is just take the
    repair actions which you've been taught on this course.
     
    You could do an assessment of them, and ba ba ba body
    thetans and sessions, and invalidations and solo auditing,
    and bow-wow, and examiners, and review, and auditors and so
    forth. And I don't care, run it on L-1, prepcheck it,
    whatever you want to do with it. You could straighten him
    out. Do you understand?
     
    If he overruns 3, there's another trick, I think I've told
    you that already. You can overrun a body thetan on 3, so
    it'll then read as an overrun 3. Well the answer to that is
    always "who".
     
    Who overran 3? Who's overrun on 3? And you'll get all of a
    sudden, we had one case who had apparently run 3, and in
    great thoroughness had overrun and ARC broken every body
    thetan he had. Actually it didn't take more than about a
    half an hour review session, or something like this, to
    clean him up both ways from the middle, and he was getting
    more blowing off than you could count. Because that's ail
    we were picking up, you know? Overrun, ARC broke, overrun,
    ARC broke, overrun, ARC broke, overrun, ARC broke. And it
    was running, Overrun, F/N. ARC break, overrun, F/N. F/N.
    Overrun, F/N. He looked like somebody'd left open the gate
    of a menagerie. But the guy really started to fly. So you
    can set 'em up. You can set 'em up. It doesn't matter.
     
    They can also do a gorgeous job of plowing themselves in on
    this. But we can pick them out of it. So, so what?
     
    Also, the larger majority of it, when they do study the
    study materials, and they do audit, go clear as a bell. You
    hit them on the left ear and they ring for half an hour.
    And of course, the trick of it all is, is after you've done
    the Clearing Course the guy usually goes free of the body
    thetans, so he parks them all over in left field. He is
    clear. Do you see? But his environment isn't. So therefore
    he often goes clear, has a ball, thinks that life is
    wonderful. And suddenly falls on his head again and can't
    understand it. Actually what he's done is run in some body
    thetans.
     
    The reason why you discharge it on 2 is so the body thetans
    won't be so charged up they can spin him when they hit 3.
    And if the guy's fixed up 2, and discharged the thing a bit
    on 2, when he hits 3 he won't spin.
     
    If you were to take somebody who was a wag, right straight
    off the street, run Incident 2, not as the capture, but
    just run Incident 2, just the volcano, and let him walk
    off, you'd probably have a dead man on your hands within
    five or six days. And the way we're getting away with it is
    fantastic. But let me point out, that it's we're getting
    away with it. Because once they start to freewheel through
    this stuff, they can't sleep, they can't eat, and they're
    finished. The body dies for lack of rest and so on. Because
    the incident itself is set up to do just that. So it's
    nothing to play with.
     
    Isn't it interesting that we haven't had it happen? Well
    it's an attestation of modern auditing and the preparation
    of cases. And the way it doesn't happen, is to get the bank
    discharged a bit.
     
    Show the guy what to do. And it doesn't happen. It's really
    remarkable.
     
    Also, we've already pointed out the by-passed charge. If he
    didn't know about Incident 1, and nobody pointed out the
    fact that there was an earlier Incident 1, and he ran the
    volcano he would spin for sure. But the mere fact that he
    knows there's an earlier Incident 1, and I don't know how
    it got removed from the materials because there was no
    doubt of it in the original material release, Incident 1 is
    way earlier. And you point out the fact that Incident 1
    exists, and that all by itself tends to discharge 2, so it
    can't wrap somebody around a telegraph pole. And that's why
    it isn't happening. I'm just telling you the other
    phenomena could happen, however.
     
    You don't...  He doesn't study the materials, never reads
    the materials, he's never been audited, he's never come up
    through the grades, and some how or another we force him back
    and run a volcano. Just that. Only we erase the volcano, and
    let him freewheel. Well the whole bank freewheels. All thetans
    in coordination do a beautiful freewheel, straight through R-6.
     
    And he'll freewheel for days and days. By freewheel I mean
    it's automatic run. It Must starts and it keeps going. Do
    you see? Basically that's why the materials are
    confidential, so just that won't happen to somebody. That's
    why we say the case should be prepared; Well, prepared.
     
    He should be run up through the grades. That's why we say
    he takes OT 3 when he's supposed to take OT 3. That's why
    the guy, when he runs OT 3, should run the study materials
    of OT 3. He should know them, and no casualties will
    occur.. It's something on the order of, you take and put a
    knife through the right hand tire of a car while it's doing
    sixty miles an hour. It'll go off the road. Well, that's a
    stupid thing to do, isn't it? That'd be a very stupid thing
    to do. Well so you don't do that to somebody.
     
    Now I don't know if you knew or not, that there was any
    liability to 3. But there is. That liability to 3. That it
    is prematurely run and so on.
     
    Now the material is somewhat self protecting. Because very
    often somebody gets a hold of the OT section materials, and
    we have had that happen. And they looked at it and said,
    "What's this got to do with? It doesn't have anything to do with me. And so forth. There isn't any picture on it.
    There's no realitv on that." And they walk off and leave
    it. And they don't even know they got their hands on
    anything. In other words, it's so far beyond their reality
    that they don't even contact it. Which is quite remarkable.
     
    Additionally, supposing somebody came along to get the
    materials, didn't run any of the materials, and then all of
    a sudden accidentally ran a piece of 3. There he would go.
    But he would have done himself in with his own lies. Well
    the materials, to that degree, is self protecting. I
    imagine some psychiatrist who got a hold of it would decide
    to test it out on some patient. He'd probably go mad far
    quicker than the patient.
     
    Alright. But the answer to the question, "What is the
    matter", and "How do you handle someone who found none on 3?" He had a severe physical injury and got them all packed together, and run it like an engram. It's the melazzo,
    actually.
     
    The majority of you got this wrong. Some said you check it
    and run the grades, and others that you unburden the case
    with LX-1 assessments and prepchecks, and so forth. No.
    The guy who found none on 3 has been packaged by a severe
    injury, and what you do is run the engram of the severe
    injury, and then blow some of them off the cluster, and
    then you can run some Incident 1's, or you can run an
    Incident 2, and then some Incident 1's, do you see? But the
    mechanism of the cluster is what you haven't understood.
    Supposing you had twenty gum balls, and they all rolled
    around independently of each other just great. Now these
    twenty gum balls are somewhat loosely heaped up. And
    somebody hits them with a sledge hammer.
     
    Now can you tell one gumball from another gumball? No. But
    if you run the engram of being hit with a sledge hammer,
    then they get separate again. You get the mechanism? And
    that's the basic mechanism by which you handle one of these
    none on 3's. It's just one of these simple things like
    release. See?
     
    Here's a whole bunch of body thetans all piled up around
    this bird, and somebody comes along with a baseball bat and
    hits the lot. And they go squash. And now they can't tell
    the difference between one or another. And each one has a
    different viewpoint of being squashed. And so the thing
    doesn't as-is, and they're all tangled up, and that usually
    puts each one of them in a different position of the back
    track in addition to the squash. It's a mess, man! So, you
    just run the engram of the squash. They all come apart and
    run individually. And that's the melazzo.
     
    And that is what you do with a none on 3. He's had a severe
    injury.
     
    Now it may be a whole chain of injuries before you suddenly
    get a release, but the top one was the cluster. Even though
    is didn't erase, you at least got the thing that
    disconnected it. Do you follow?
     
    Funny part of it is you can do that two or three times. If
    you ever ran into a cluster of a person who had been
    electric shocked. Violently electric shocked, it's liable
    to come off piece meal as a cluster. You know, it isn't a
    PC, but some electric shock case, having kicked the bucket
    under the gentle ministrations of what they laughingly call
    the butchers. Alright, that character goes out as one
    piece, don't you see? And he sort of flies around and then
    he hits somebody.
     
    That's a cluster. There be a pressure on the body. Now the
    preclear won't be a part of this cluster. It'll simply be
    hitting him. So the thing you do is you've still got to
    find a mutual engram of the cluster. And then the PC may be
    very confused, because he's never had that experience. Well
    that's right. But it's still just the mutual engram of the
    cluster and then you run the Incident 1s out of it, and it
    all goes sssssl It's a very easy operation if you know the
    mechanics of the thing.
     
    So if you're ever puzzled about this, remember hitting a
    pile of gumballs with a sledge hammer, and then figure out
    how you would fix that up. And that's all there is to it.
     
    Once more you're making too much out of it! Simple.
    Elementary. Alright? Now, the next one is, "What do you
    know when you ret a read on overrun on 3?" Well there's
    been one incident, number, an Incident 1 overrun on
    somebody or something. But it doesn't mean 3's overrun. It
    means somebody has been overrun on an engram in 3. Got it?
    Alright.
     
    And most of you said to handle it like an overrun. Boy,
    you'd go mad trying to handle it as an overrun. Somebody's
    got to find what, who, which, has been overrun? Therefore,
    it's a very peculiar overrun. Don't you see? If
    somebody,...  People who've run the thing verbally, "Go back to the beginning of the incident," see? They've said this a half a dozen times. The thing is already erased. The thetan
    parks back at the beginning of the incident. But there
    ain't anything there! And so he stays there in confusion.
    "What am I supposed to do here? What am I supposed to do
    here? What am I supposed to do here? What am I supposed to
    do here?" You catch him a month or two later, and all you
    do is indicate the fact that he's overrun it, and he goes
    thump! "What do you know? Sssst!" Gone. See, it's one of these damn fool foolishnesses, see?
     
    "Everybody knows the mind is so complicated that nobody
    could possibly figure any of these things out." Truth of
    the matter is, they're so buried under complexity that
    they've been very hard to dig up. But once they're dug up,
    boy, they look as plain as a dogs' bone on the lawn.
     
    And then you come along and you say, "See that over there?
    That's a dogs' bone. It's just been dug up.' And people
    say, "Now let's see. Is it the bone of a cow?" It's
    irrelevant. It doesn't matter what it's a bone of.
     
    Alright. Here was question 270, "Should you find out what
    the TA is up on before you get it down?" No. Mostly said
    yes. Should you find out what the TA is up on before you
    get it down? Not necessarily. Not necessarily at all. You
    can simply ask the guy, "What has been overrun?" It very ordinarily comes down. Do you follow? I'm afraid that was
    one of these trick questions. One of these sneaky
    questions. But, if you first try to find out what it was up
    on before you did something to get it down, you would very
    often miss. This is one of these wild questions.
     
    The TA that starts going up, don't you ever as an auditor
    sit there and watch a TA go up. You indicate, ask if
    something's been overrun, PC can't find anything, come
    down. You start messing around with it at that particular
    point and you're liable to be in severe trouble. Right in
    the middle of a session. He can't answer the question. He
    doesn't know what's been overrun.
     
    That's not been overrun. You shoot at it a couple of times
    and it doesn't come down. You had better instruct any
    auditor auditing for you to pack it up and ask for a C/S.
    Don't go on with the thing going up and don't get in a fire
    fight over the PC trying to get it down. Similarly, a low
    TA. Don't do that. In the middle of a session all of a
    sudden the guy's TA goes low. Don't start bugging him.
    Don't start chopping him up about it, because he'll get
    frantic. That's why PCs should never be able to see the TA.
    Never. He starts getting frantic. You've entered a present
    time problem into this thing. And you know very well, by
    the mechanics of it, the person who has a present time
    problem, he doesn't make any case gain.
     
    Well let's look at it now. The guy knows he's got his TA
    high, or he knows he's got his TA low. He now has a present
    time problem, right? The weird part of it is, you're not
    going to solve it. Your chances of setting the TA down at
    that moment are zero. That's how you get into these fire
    fights, 'cause the guy's now got a present time problem. If
    you're going to ask him anything, "Do you have a present
    time problem?" "Yes I have a present time problem. I have a TA that's high." "Well good. Thank you very much." You'll watch the TA come down. You see it's idiocy, but if the
    guy's TA is starting to rise and you can't immediately go
    back and say, "Hey, wait a minute. It goes back to here", and rehab it right now, pack it up. Don't just sit there
    and fool with it.
     
    A TA which inexplicably goes up when it shouldn't be going
    up usually forecasts itself a long time before. You'll see
    this person's TA acts up. Suddenly. Why? Actually, the
    thing I would do on it, is I wouldn't fool around with a TA
    that suddenly, inexplicably goes up. The auditor tried to
    rehab, say, "Did I bypass an F/N?" So forth, and yip yip, and so on. "Was something been overrun?" And the TA keeps going up. Oh brother. Unload, unload. Knock it right off
    right there. Pack it up, and say, "Thank you very much." And send it, send the thing for a C/S.
     
    Or make somebody send it to you for a C/S.
     
    What you normally order, what you normally order that is
    the most successful, is seven special cases. Something has
    appeared on this case that wasn't here before. And you're
    liable to get the most astonishing result out of this. And
    once you do that, wham wham wham wham. Now don't, in a
    session, try to C/S it at the same time. I've tried to keep
    you from doing that. But if you can't immediately spot,
    "Hey wait a minute. I by-passed an F/N on you." You should see it right in front of you. You say, What the hell was
    the matter with me? I mean, there it was.
     
    He got an F/N on clearing the command and I thought he was
    still F/Ning on the last process.
     
    And obviously he F/Ned on clearing the command and I missed
    it. The TA'll go flow, boom.
     
    F/N. See? Nothing to it. But if that doesn't happen, and it
    doesn't clear it and so on, then you had better do an
    assessment and every other damn thing.
     
    Those are the proper actions for handling high TA or low
    TA. But if the guy's TA is going low, and he's getting ARC
    break needles with the TA down at 1.5, and all of this sort
    of thing, and oh wow, wow wow. You can get into an awful
    fire fight with a PC under that one, too.
     
    And the best thing to do if you don't immediately
    rehabilitate it, wham wham wham, and it's quite obvious
    what this thing was all about, in the first place it isn't
    gonna do him a bit of harm running with a low TA, 'cause
    it'll come right back up again. Usually a low TA'll come
    right back up again. There's case after case around, that
    every time you ask them a question the TA goes down to 1.7.
    And then as they answer it, it goes back up to 2. So why
    get, why get all sweated us about it? But he goes down to
    1.5 and has an F/N, well that's for sure an ARC break. So
    that you can check that out easily enough. You can check it
    out now. But if it's getting difficult to check out, pack
    it up. Get another C/S. Get back off of this thing and take
    a look at it. And see what's wrong with this case. All of a
    sudden, all will meet the eye.
     
    You're busy processing somebody who is so PTS it is
    pathetic. The whole behavior of the case is this. You start
    tracing back through other ARC breaks the person's had.
    It's always an ARC breaK with mother, or it's an ARC break
    with something, or it's an ARC break with wuf wuf wuf, and
    each time they have this ARC break the TA is sunk. A
    person's PTS as hell, this is the time to run an S and D,
    something of that sort. He's PTS.
     
    You know that a low TA equals invalidation, high TA equals
    overrun. There's nothing more simple than that. Do you
    follow? Alright.
     
    Now whether you know it, the thetan starts to spin on
    Incident 1. Well he doesn't spin on Incident 1 really in
    the first place, but he has run an incident that should be,
    what do you know if the thetan starts to spin on Section 3?
    And so forth. Or something. He normally has run a 1 on one
    thetan, and a 2 on another thetan, so that's he's got a 2
    which has been run without its' 1. And it's when you run a
    2 without its' 1 that the guy spins. Yet people will do
    this. Every now and then they run...  They will run on this
    one and 1 on Joe, and 2 on Pete. Now Pete starts to
    freewheel. So all you have to ask is, "When did you run the Incident 2?" Something like that. And, alright, then get
    the same thetan down, and run an Incident 1 - And he
    unspins, just like that. Magical. Right now. That's all
    thatts wrong. Do you follow? Some said not enough food and
    rest, and other said the case was overcharged. Both of
    which are probably true. But the actual action is, he's
    run, usually run an Incident 1 on one thetan, an Incident 2
    on another thetan, and you've got an Incident 2 run now,
    with the thetan going through the thirty six days, all on a
    big freewheel. And maybe a whole cluster started through
    it. And the thing to do is to whip it back, and get the 1
    run on the guys who are going through 2. And you get the
    Incident 1 run, it'll unspin, just like that. There's
    nothing to it.
     
    Alright, "Explain the mechanics of LX-1." It's the basic postulate he made to move off the track. The mechanics of
    LX-1 is simply he couldn't stand it anymore, so he decided
    he had been wiped out, driven off, over powered,
    overwhelmed, whatever the words are of LX-1, and he's moved
    off the track. And he's not now in his own valence. And by
    running recall you discharge the top of the engram and you
    can run the engram out to then, and he will get back in his
    own valence. And he can stay in his own valence. As long as
    the case is very badly over charged he's not likely to stay
    in his own valence.
     
    Some two or three people, by the way, believe implicitly,
    for some reason or other, I don't know why, but some two or
    three people believe that if you'd run LX-1 you omitted the
    valence shifter on the full four rundown. And I don't know
    how anybody would figure that out, because the full four
    rundown doesn't have anything to do with LX-1. And one case
    that had, had the valence shifter left out of the full four
    rundown had a lot of trouble at once. So it's not something
    that you would leave out.
     
    There's probably fifty ways you could handle the guy out of
    valence. Well the first way that was ever written about is
    in Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health. It says,
    "Get into your own valence." There's was after way you can handle it. But the case is so over charged he can't stay in
    his own valence. So you have to discharge the case. So
    anyway a case can be discharged will eventually get him
    back into his own valence. But the full four rundown flips
    him out of the valence as a body thetan and gets him into
    his own valence, so that you can run confront on him. If
    you run the full four...
     
    You recall the being, you run the motivator chain, you run
    the engram-overt chain. Those are the actions you take, and
    that is the only actions which you take. You actually could
    prepcheck it or something. But it seems silly to prepcheck
    it, because it's too hot a button. And that isn't what's
    wrong with him. OK?
     
    Actually I think you did most remarkably well. And I have
    noticed, I have noticed that anybody who can pass a long
    examination with high grade normally knows what he's doing.
     
    Now there are a few more points I'd like to make here,
    before, while I still have a chance to explain them to you.
    Now one, at this juncture, it will be available to you. I
    have been working too hard with you, and so on, to actually
    put together your book of case supervision. And what you
    lack is why certain things are done here and there. And I
    haven't explained that in all things. It seems sort of
    mysterious. And it's funny to me to have to explain it,
    because it sort of feels to me like I'm explaining why a
    lead pencil makes a mark. You know? Here is this bird and
    he has...  It's so damn simple some of these things, you
    see? He's got a folder six inches thick! Well now look, if
    that many auditors had worked on him for that long,
    and he is still getting audited, the case is overcharged.
    That's a very clever analysis, isn't it? Thick folder.
     
    So we're going to undertake a lot of actions to take charge
    off the case, because it's all on the basis that reality is
    proportonal to the amount of charge off it. Alright? But
    it's that kind of think. That kind of think. And you
    wonder...  Actually C/S 7 was saying to me the other day on
    one case here, "God that was clever. To prepcheck a
    floating needle. Look what it did for that case. How on
    earth did you ever guess that?" 'Cause it just says,
    "Prepcheck floating needle." See? Bong. You know? No
    assessment, nothing. Bang! You know? And, prepcheck it, and
    wow! It goes on and on and on and on and on. And it's all
    straightened out. And the case does beautifully.
     
    I'm afraid I can't take too much credit for it, because the
    guy has complained to his auditor about floating needles,
    and he has even said that every time he gets a floating
    needle he feels horrible. He's complained to the examiner
    about a floating needle. Not, not very mysterious.
     
    So I just looked at this, and read it over and so forth,
    and I was reading through it to find where I could
    straighten this case out a little bit more, and I ordered
    three prepchecks on it. And the first one to prep check
    floating needles. Naturally. You see? So you're not very
    mysterious.
     
    It's sort of like asking me to explain why is that white
    sign white. What color paint do we use to paint a white
    sign? And I look sort of blank, and I say, "Well alright.
    White paint." "Great! I never would have guessed it!" You know?
     
    Alright, so this guy, this guy...  It's reading the folder,
    it's reading the folder. It's reading what's going on.
    That's why auditors have to be able to write. And if you
    want to keep yourself from getting headaches as a case
    supervisor, you should insist like hell that auditors
    either clarify what they've written, or write plainly.
    Because otherwise you can pick up a case, you know? Trying
    to make the damn thing out, and you want to help the guy,
    and somebody's standing in your road with a horrible
    scribble, and, and you get strained up on it. Boom.
     
    But you look through this thing and you say, "Well I don't
    find my wife, and so on, but in the next session, wa wa wa
    wa gab gab and my wife, and so on." Aw, for Christs' sakes! There's no mystery about it. The guy keeps getting off the
    same withhold, and he keeps getting off the same PTPs, and
    so forth. And in setting up the case let's just make sure
    that these things get cleaned up, that's all. They
    obviously aren't getting cleaned up.
     
    One of the ways, and the ways, the idiot way they don't get
    cleaned up is, the guy has a withhold, and he gives it as
    an ARC break. The guy has a PTP and he gives it as a missed
    withhold. So I'm likely to be as evaluative as this. "Prepcheck the missed withholds." He keeps giving them as ARC breaks and PTPs, and they're very obvious. It's no guesswork on my part.
    I mean, they are.
     
    See, an ARC break, "I don't know how I'm going to pay for... " Oh, god, Christ! That's not an ARC break. Never has, never will be. And yet, somebody's running ARCU, CDEI. And then they run
    this column after column, and page after page, and ARCU, CDEI,
    and "Do you have an ARC break?" And here's a big fall, and then they clean up false. And the guy never does give them
    anything under gods' green earth but PTPs. And then I'm
    liable to say, "Fly the Ruds, but clear each command." And the case straightens out.
     
    You see, you can't straighten out a case on missed
    withholds if nobody asks him for anything but ARC breaks.
    You see, it's all this idiot stuff. Like the way to cross
    the river, you cross the river. You know? The way to get in
    the boat is you get in the boat. If you want to get the PC
    someplace in a boat, you have to have a boat to put him in.
    You know, it's this kind of stuff.
     
    And the violation of logic is so fantastic as you wouldn't
    believe it. And until you're case supervising you won't
    believe how easy it is to do. It's terribly easy. Very,
    very simple.
     
    Well you can't clean up one rudiment if the guy never,
    doesn't know what the rudiment is, and is always cleaning
    up some other rudiment. Right? You see, the case, the case
    is always having trouble with X, A, or something. He's
    always having trouble with this guy, he's always having
    trouble with this guy, he's always having trouble with this
    guy. Hmm. Well yes, he's at least got a problem with him.
    See? So you could actually specify. "Ask him about the
    problem with Joe, and by earlier similar itsa get rid of
    it." Because he's obviously got Joe identified with Admiral Henobarbus back in someplace, you know? Wow. It's not
    complicated. Cases are not complicated when you know this.
    They're very simple. But you have to do the thing you're
    supposed to do. And that's what standard tech becomes. For
    instance the guy's got to have his ARC break cleaned up.
    He's in a sad effect. Alright? He's in a sad effect. What
    you gonna do? Sit there and pull missed withholds? Well you
    know very well that's idiotic. But it's just as idiotic to
    clear up his missed withholds by running ARC breaks. Or,
    try to clear up his PTPs by, he keeps saying they're ARC
    breaks. Do you see? There's some illogic about all this.
    There's something that doesn't add up about all this. And
    all you'd have to do is look for what doesn't add up and
    that's that.
     
    But I want to make this point with you very sharply. And
    that is the available F/Ns. How many F/Ns can you get? Now
    you're liable to get yourself a problem that runs something
    like this.
     
    Some weird problem. See? And it runs something like this.
    Former therapy. And you run the motivator engram. And the
    guy's still got a somatic, but it's F/Ned. Well, it F/Ned.
    Well you can't do anything more with that, can you? Still
    got a somatic. And you know he's still got a somatic of
    having his guts cut out or whatever they do. And he ran the
    engram of it. Oh, what can we do? All is lost. There's an
    available F/N on the overt. You find and run an overt
    chain, you find out he was making a specialty of cutting
    people's guts out. And that's the somatic.
     
    And that's why it's still there.
     
    Now let's say, here's an actual case, of somebody who had
    an Incident 2, shot in the brisket.
     
    Run out, discharge to F/N. Alright, great. Still sore!
    Still got the somatic. You say, "Oh wow.
     
    We failed." No, no, there's another F/N available on
    shooting people in the brisket. So you run the overt side
    of it, and the somatic goes pft! Magically. So you don't do
    any more work than you have to do, if you got rid of it
    running the motivator side, great. But if you ran the
    motivator side, and the guy's left with a somatic, you
    still got an F/N on the overt side. Do you follow? Now
    sometimes you run "Recall being... ", and then you run "Doing it... ", and you'll get rid of both sides very
    nicely. But it sometimes doesn't work. And remember you've
    still got an F/N left. Look at the number of F/Ns
    available. On the recall process, any recall process,
    there's an F/N available. Any motivator chain of
    secondaries, there's an F/N available. Any motivator chain
    of engrams, there's an F/N available. Any overt chain of
    motivators, there's an F/N available.
     
    There's an F/N available on secondaries, overt secondaries.
    There's an F/N available on overt engrams. And there's an
    F/N available on recall the overt. So you got one item
    assessed off a list, and what do you know? You got six F/Ns
    available. The possibility of running them all on most
    cases is slight, because you try to run the secondary, and
    they're liable to plunge into the engram. But at the very
    least you've got two. You have been given a sketchy line up
    of it, because it's usually sufficient. But look how many
    are available.
     
    Now we've got "Assess the item kicked" on some list. So we could run "Recall being kicked." Bang. Recall being kicked. We could also run "Recall kicking." That's two F/Ns. Now we could run the engrams of being kicked, and we could also
    run the engrams of kicking. And that's four F/Ns. That's
    four F/Ns on the same subject. It's just which way did the
    flow go? So don't feel all is lost if you've run an engram
    chain to an F/N. All is not lost. You've got the other
    chain you can run. This fellow says, "Well I got this
    horrible head, this horrible head, and it doesn't go away,
    and my back hurts and my head hurts, and it just doesn't go
    away." And you've run all of his head injuries and his back injuries, and well...  Well get clever. You get clever. You
    have an engram chain on the other side you can run also to
    F/N, which is him, hurting peoples' heads, hurting peoples'
    backs. And you've probably got one on heads, and you've
    probably got one on backs. Do you follow? There's a lot of
    F/Ns available. But your minimum number of F/Ns on any
    button is four. Recall motivator, recall overt, engram
    motivator, engram overt And if you, if it's all very sad
    and misemotional also, why you've got two secondaries
    available. "Recall this death." Whatever it is, see? Being sad about some relatives' death, see, and you run that
    thing out, and that's all squared around. Alright, did you
    ever think or running somebody being sad about your death?
    Do you see?
     
    See, there's two different things available, see? And very
    often when your death engrams or your death secondaries,
    rather, won't run, it's because, you know, the fellow just
    lost his uncle, and he felt very sad about it, and he's
    griefy, and he runs it through and he still feels griery
    about death. And it went to F/N but he didn't, didn't feel
    so good. And so forth. Run the secondary, run the secondary
    of somebody feeling bad about his death. And all of a
    sudden the whole thing will go zzzt! And this is the phenomena.
     
    Now hear me now, 'cause every once in a while you're going
    to have gotten an F/N on some injury, and then have the
    person complain that it F/Ned before he got rid of it. Have
    you ever had that happen? It shows up every now and then.
     
    Well it F/Ned on the motivator, or it F/Ned on the overt.
    And it hasn't F/Ned on the other side, and there's still
    mass there. They're not, they actually if they checked it
    over, they're not now sad about their uncles' death. They
    just know they got this funny griefy feeling stuck on their
    skull. So they say, "Well it F/Ned. I think it F/Ned too
    quick. Well sure. It didn't all disappear." Well if that
    side of it F/Ned he's released from that side of it.
    There's two sides to that, you know. Now you can turn
    around and run the other side, whichever way it is, and the
    rest of the mass goes pffft! And then that really does F/N.
    It'll be a relatively small F/N. But if you've ever had
    somebody complain, "Oh well yes. Well I F/Ned on it, but it really ended off too quick." Yeah well they had it coming
    one way and went the other way. You pay a lot of attention
    to that. 'Cause you know you're running this guy with
    motivators when he's guilty as sin of a bunch of overts. So
    he F/Ns on the motivators, but the overts are still there
    bugging him. But of course they're all ready to blow.
    They'll blow now, go binge You could just run them very
    briefly, and they'd blow. But he deserves the motivator,
    don't you see? And you ran out the motivator. Now he hasn't
    got a motivator, but he's got the overt. So he gets sort of
    unhappy. You got it?
     
    That's how many F/Ns there are available. Theoretically
    there're six F/Ns available on any button. You should be
    able to plot this course off the top of your head. There's
    nothing to it.
     
    Alright. Now there's another point here which I haven't
    covered with you too well. Missed withholds. Missed
    withholds. Missed withholds. You are always asking for
    missed withholds, and so forth, and I very often say
    missed withholds when I say rudiments. But the rudiment is
    withhold. The rudiment is not missed withhold. The standard
    rudiment is withhold. Not missed withhold, but withhold.
    And here and there in your sessions you've missed a time or
    two, because you haven't used withhold. Because there's a
    whole line of the whole subject of withhold is absolutely
    fascinating. The whole subject of withhold is miraculous
    and marvelous.
     
    Guys who go around withholding, and guys who have
    withholds, and all of this sort of thing.
     
    You get so accustomed to thinking that a guy is bad off
    because he has withholds, that you don't wonder whv he's
    bad off because he has withholds. Well, he's bad oft
    because he has withholds, not because he's dishonest, but
    because he's not flowing in a certain direction. And he
    can't flow in that direction, and he keeps it piled up on
    himself. And you can get the same action.
     
    Now, as, well you can practically push his face in. You can
    get something that feels very much like body thetans, and
    so forth, just because the guy is withholding. Just that.
    Just withholding. Nobody's missing a withhold. He's just
    withholding.
     
    I'll give you an example. Way back when I was fooling
    around and doing some research thing, I all of a sudden
    found out sitting at breakfast that it was a very
    unpleasant proceeding sitting at breakfast, for the
    excellent reason that the wax type of milk carton which is
    cold, clammy and slimy, sitting only three or four feet
    from me, if I would become incautious enough to let my
    perceptivity slide out if that far, I would collide with
    this damned, cold, slimy milk carton. See? Waxed paper milk
    carton. So I'd have to eat breakfast held back from this
    milk carton. After a while I'd find myself getting sort of
    cross. And I'd get up, and I'd be fine. And then I suddenly
    realized, maybe other people get up against things and they
    don't go back out in that direction. So I have checked this
    out, and that turned out to be the case.
     
    Thetans withhold. They withhold energy, they withhold
    beams, they withhold emotion, they withhold mass, they
    withhold from going someplace, when they shoot somebody
    they withhold from being him. Nobody missed it. And a case
    can get just gorgeously stacked up, because of withholds.
    Withhold, withhold.
     
    Thus American girls are very often quite withholdy, and the
    reason why is, is over in America the girls don't, aren't
    taught to shake hands. And they're taught that they must be
    reached for, and never to reach. And that it's unladylike
    to reach, and that sort of thing. No criticism of it one
    way or the other. But you will eventually find them sort
    of, and anybody else in the world that's been trained that
    way, you eventually find them sort of caved in. And you, as
    an auditor, might think they've committed some fabulous
    crime. Whereas it's no more important than the fact that
    they must not ever reach in the direction of a man. Or
    mustn't ever reach in the direction of another person. It's
    which directions they mustn't reach. And they're withheld
    permanently from that area. See? There they are,
    withholding. Withholding, withholding, withholding,
    withholding, withholding. Eventually they squash their noses.
     
    And now you come along, and you're asked to perform some
    miracle. "Freed me from squashing my nose" sort of miracle, you know? Now this is very unimportant in the lower grades,
    but when you get up into the OT sections, what I'm telling
    you now, is very, very important. Because you are going to
    find some guys have nothing more wrong with them than the
    damn fools keep on holding onto their bodies from in front.
    And that those horrible somatics they've got that is
    tearing their knees apart, or something like that, is
    simply them pushing on their knees. It's very mysterious.
     
    "Oh, what can be wrong with George? He seems to have these
    sore throats all the time." Well now the guy is up around
    an honest 5, or something like this, and he starts
    developing sore throat and so on. You of course don't audit
    in this fashion, but you could say, you know, "Why don't
    you let go of your throat, boy?" So he'll say, "Oh. Have I got ahold of my throat? Ha ha ha ha, yes." Very difficult.
    Very difficult.
     
    The guys get into OT sections, they one, will withhold from
    things, and they can damn near pull their skulls off or
    crush their chests or something, see? Or, they've got hold
    of the body, or somebody has offered them something and
    they've suddenly tensed back from it. And it's practically
    busted their ribs or something. And you run into one of
    them right after he's flinched from something of this sort.
    He walked out of the building and he comes back in and he's
    all caved in. And you say, "Oh my god, what masses have we
    got? He must have more body thetans. Let's see, what can we
    do? What wonderful process do we have to run on this bird?" And the funny part of it is, if you use the rudiment
    withhold, particularly as you get up into the upper
    sections, as well as the rudiment missed withhold...  And
    the way you do that is you ask for a withhold, and then
    determine whether or not it's the kind of withhold which is
    discreditable so somebody would miss it, or whether it's
    just plain withhold. And you'll ask for the missed
    afterwards. Or not ask for it. But the actual proper
    rudiment question on OT levels is withhold, not missed.
     
    "Do you have any missed withholds?" Now I've been watching it go on here for some time, and been expecting in vain for
    some of you to suddenly ask the ordinary, garden variety,
    way back when rudiment, "Do you have withholds? Or, are you withholding anything?" Now you start asking OTs if they're
    withholding anything, and fifty percent of their somatics
    will just go up in smoke. See? So you're missing one.
     
    This is the great ease with which some of this stuff works.
    So the guy has just went up and pulled himself back on the
    curb suddenly so that he couldn't be hit by the taxi cab.
    And he comes in and he's all, so on. You set in, you're
    getting in the Ruds. You don't have to know all that. See?
    You're getting, "Are you withholding anything?", and "Have you withheld anything?" Or something like that. And you get a little read. And he feels wonderful. "Oh yeah! Taxi cab.
    I got myself back off the curb. I withheld...  Yeah, that's
    it." WhmI Because you're dealing with somebody who is
    already pulling, and squashing, and grabbing.
     
    Now theoretically you could also ask somebody, "Where you
    got hold of the body?" And that would cause it. On the OT
    sections you can't figure out what in the hell is going on,
    add that to your repertoire. Just, "Do you have hold of the body, or are you pushing on the bony in some way?" If
    they're not, you won't get any read, and if they are, the
    damn meter will blow up.
     
    You got the point? Because you're dealing with somebody who
    holds onto bodies, who pulls back bodies, who withholds
    bodies, who withholds energy, who pulls in energy beams. Do
    you follow? So that you certainly check this on the upper
    levels. Not very important on the lower grades.
     
    We found out that newspaper reporters were never, never,
    never able, never, never, never, never able to make a
    little beep meter we had work. Whereas any, anybody who had
    been audited at all could make the thing connect and spark,
    and short circuit. We had a little machine.
     
    We'd set it up. And we found that newspaper reporters,
    wogs, guys off the street, they'd look at this thing, and
    they'd try to do it, see? Rather pathetic. You know? They'd
    try to do it, and nothing happened. They couldn't make the
    thing close. Actually all you had to do is put a spark
    between it, and a buzzer went off. You can set up two, two
    contacts, or hold one contact next to a body while the body
    is also connected to another contact, a very low voltage.
    And you hold that out from the cheek, and then somebody
    stands off thirty feet and makes a beam. He puts a beam
    between the cheek and the finger, and the buzzer goes. And
    he can turn the buzzer on and off at will. It's one of the
    most remarkable experiences you ever saw in your life.
     
    The lower level guy, he couldn't do it. And anybody who had
    been audited at all, boy he could make that thing go beeps
    And off and on, and first he'd say, "Christ, I couldn't be
    doing that. That is not possible." And then, ding, "Yes, that was me. Hey! I'm an electric eel." See, he could do it. He could do it thirty, forty, fifty feet away as far as he could see
    it. Which is very interesting indeed.
     
    Now if a guy can do that he also can of course apply close
    up on his own body the most fantastic amounts of energy.
    Actually you can apply him almost at any distance. You got
    that one?
     
    Now also, let me give you another one that goes along with.
    Some OTs go around, get a high TA because they lean on
    things. And if all else fails, remember that they also can
    lean on things. They habitually push against a wall because
    rooms are too small. And they don't catch themselves doing
    it, and it pushes up their TA. they lean on the wall. Very
    simple. They will do anything that a guy would do with
    current. Current or force. You can expect anybody to do.
     
    One guy had terrible trouble because he had ringing in his
    ears. And he was ringing them.
     
    Now to show you how far out some things can as, there is a
    dictionary which I did not do, which is called the
    Scientology dictionary. I've never read it. It was called
    to my attention the other day that the definition of recall
    in it is to reexperience, which is completely wrong. I
    merely bring this up as what happens when I start
    clarifying materials. A few bulletins, a few things come
    out that I haven't written, I haven't said anything about,
    there's some errors creed un in those things, and it throws
    technology out. This is what you've got to keep an eye out
    for. If you run into this sort of thing, why, send it
    through to me and let me find out whether or not it is
    factual or not, on a clarification. Because you're liable
    to get in some arguments with somebody on it.
     
    Another datum I wanted to give you, is you can do two or
    three assessments on LX-1 and run each one of them with
    engram chains and recalls, and everything else. I mean,
    it's quite remarkable. They move upscale on LX-1. They'll
    get different buttons. And you can do the same things with
    them all over again.
     
    Now, we have, we have pretty well reached the end of the
    line here. We have pretty well reached the end of the line,
    and we have the general situation pretty well in hand. Not
    to pile you up with a tremendous amount of data here in the
    last few minutes of play, but I will tell you this. That
    putting through this Org VIII Course as we have called it
    aboard, has been quite a tour de force. It has been, called
    for a lot of coordination in a lot of ways. And I noticed even
    down in the last few minutes of play that we were still
    riding close to the edge in some instances. And all that
    got straightened out.
     
    Now I want to talk to you for just a few minutes here on
    the subject of what you will be doing, what your
    difficulties might be. First and foremost people are going
    to ask you, "What is so different about standard tech that
    is different from Scientology?" And a wise guy sort of
    answer, which is perfectly legitimate is, "Well you see,
    standard tech is the way Ron does it." That was sort of,
    just, you know, floor the opposition.
     
    But, the truth of the matter is, is standard tech is a
    standardization of processes, so that they apply to a
    hundred percent of the cases to which they are addressed.
    And that was the main thing. And it was codifying a style
    of auditing which produced maximum results in minimum time.
    And that was what standard tech was. And they're going to
    say, "Well that therefore invalidates my Class IV, my Class VI." And you say, "Oh no. No, no, no, not, not at all, not at all. But in due course, when you have learned all there
    is to know about everything you can also learn to be
    totally simple. And when you achieve that you have achieved
    then maximum velocity and maximum gain."
     
    Standard tech is simply how to achieve maximum velocity,
    maximum gain in processing, and what are the real
    importances in processing, and how do you set cases up, and
    what do you do with them. The truth of the matter is, the
    subject itself was pretty well wrapped up in 1966, but
    required settling down. And it hasn't been until now that I
    have settled the whole subject down, and have begun to take
    out of the lineup additives which have been put in there
    that were unnecessary, and made it come back and do what is
    was supposed to do. For instance, as you've seen even on
    the OT sections I have taught you how to get something like
    maximum gain out of the OT sections. I've taught you how to
    get more gain, more velocity, out of the actions which
    other people would say, "Well I don't see how that's any
    different than anything I've been doing. I sit down at a
    table, I let people talk to me while I fiddle with my
    E-meter. I don't see how anything's different about that,
    and so forth." Well, I'll tell you to whom it will make a
    great deal of difference. It'll make a deal of difference
    to somebody who has been trying to put across to somebody
    that his case hasn't been handled, and people have gone on
    not handling it for some time. It will make a great deal of
    difference to that person. It will also start to make
    difference to anybody else in the vicinity who is audited
    by comparison. He's been audited one way, and he suddenly
    starts getting audited in a highly simple way, and he
    starts making much faster case gains in the same line of
    direction.
     
    So in actual fact, standard tech, for all of the
    technology, or for all of the work which has gone into the
    simplification of it, for all the work of codification of
    how I got it across to you, and so on, is more of an
    experience than an action. It is something which is
    experienced. And after you've been at it for a while you've
    either got it or you ain't. You see? It's something you
    experienced.
     
    Now just as the lowest mark on the course was the one who
    had been audited the least, this coordinated. He started to
    catch up undoubtedly in the last couple of days. But it
    took a catch up. Because it's something one experiences.
     
    Now I don't want auditors at large across the world to
    believe that all of their training is invalidated. Quite
    the contrary. What I believe is that somebody has
    invalidated their training.
     
    What we're doing is de-invalidating training. What they
    have learned, they have learned. And then somebody has
    pushed it aside so they felt that is was not learned. And
    what it required was a stabilization. And giving one back a
    security of the data. And if one had a security of data, he
    could then carry on very nicely and very smoothly, because
    with that security of data and with somebody holding him on
    the square, hair line road of it, he all of a sudden
    realized that by doing it just this way, and using just
    this data, he all of a sudden got things to fly, which have
    never been flown before. And so therefore, the biggest hump
    in standard tech is the auditor making it work and the
    auditor having it work on him. Can he make it work as an
    auditor? Does it work on him? And so on. And out of that of
    course, you get your superlative auditor.
     
    For instance, it'd be very difficult to kid me about how
    this worked or that worked, or something else worked. I
    know how these things work. And anybody who has worked
    very long in this field with standard tech, and he's seen
    this work, and he's seen the put together, and he's managed
    to cut it down to where he's, to look at it is totally simple,
    and so forth, to jar him out of that rut would be very, very
    difficult indeed. In fact people are liable to accuse him of
    being unbudge-able, or conservative, or a fuddy-duddy. "What's the matter? You mean he won't run PCs wiggling their ears
    anymore?" and so forth?
     
    But people are going to ask you. People are going to ask
    you, "Why is standard tech so different than just general
    tech?" Well actually there is no general tech. There has
    really never been anything but standard tech. But, it
    required codification, it required delivery, it required
    simplification, and once the research line was completed on
    it, it had to be delivered and it had to be delivered in
    the simplest possible fashion. It is necessary, actually,
    for an auditor to go all over the research lines and datas
    and side panels, and everything else of this whole subject,
    as he does on the Class VI course, before he can appreciate
    all there is to know, and how little of it is a main line
    action. And if he gets that all settled and straightened
    out, he knows a tremendous body of data about the mind.
    There are fabulous amounts of it.
     
    You actually, if you settle down on just standard tech only
    and didn't know the other lines, then people would think
    they were making fabulous discoveries every time they found
    out that you could match terminal a couple of mock ups.
    See, they didn't know that that was ever part of the
    subject matter. But do you know, oddly enough if hypnotism,
    and a lot of other subjects of one kind or another went
    this route, the material which was evolved in the days of
    Mesmer and Charcreax was considerable. There was an
    enormous amount of it. And it's been boiled down now to
    some little, tiny balderdash that doesn't even work. But
    there was a lot known in this particular field. There was a
    lot known. And it has all more or less disappeared. It
    isn't know to anybody anymore.
     
    It's very funny. Now any day now I expect somebody to break
    out and find out that there is such a thing as an hypnotic
    rapport. A guy pinches himself in the shoulder and somebody
    else feels the pinch. And they're going to be very
    fascinated. "How did that happen?" Actually it's all part, and is called actually, Mesmerism. Back in the eighteenth
    century. If one doesn't know the scope of discovery of a
    subject he cannot then take hold of its' various
    importances. If one doesn't know how wide the study is,
    then he cannot also find out how narrow is the walk that
    goes through it. If you can grasp that you've got it made.
     
    And you're going to see that when you talk to an academy
    student. And you're going to tell him just exactly what
    you're doing is great. And he's doing just exactly this,
    and you actually think you have a cracker jack auditor, and
    he can do exactly what you say, and go ahead and this is
    great. And you think that's fine. There is no reason to
    make a Class VI out of him, he's doing so well. This guy is
    in danger of stepping off the edge of the sidewalk, and
    finding out some horrendous thing, like "invent a problem", get himself some big win, feel that the field has not been
    covered or researched, and then he's completely off into
    some brand new field.
     
    Scientology being only this tiny, little, simple thing, you
    see? He's in this brand new field, which has a vast ocean
    of data in connected to it, because he's never been exposed
    to the data.
     
    He actually won't be an auditor who can hold the line until
    he's also found how much there is to hold. And then he will
    understand it.
     
    Now when you try to relay to somebody, "This is standard
    tech. I am a Class VIII." Yes, people are going to be
    making a bunch of, a lot of fuss over you. That's for sure.
    And you have deserved it. You've earned it. They will try
    to feel un-invalidated, not invalidated, and this sort of
    thing, and be happy about this. Well you can help them be
    happy about the whole thing by saying, oh well you see, the
    funny part of it is, is all the simple things you know are
    true.
     
    And the only difference is, is you don't know how true they
    are. And Ron said for me to tell you that standard tech
    does not invalidate anybody's tech, but is just the high
    velocity, fast, streamlined way through, and it takes the
    total expert to do it. It is the road to total gains. Well,
    you have to know a great deal.
     
    Now all of you have been trained a great deal down through
    the years. You've had lots of training of this way and that
    way, and you've done this and you've done that and you've
    done the other thing. The net result of it is that you can
    look back over it, and you can see, you can see where it's
    shined up, and you can see where it was rather dim. And you
    undoubtedly, those of you who have been through Saint Hill
    recently and so on, and those of you who are very old
    timers indeed, have a very good grasp on the whole width of
    the subject, have a very, very good grasp on the subject
    itself, and know very well it is only where your own
    insights have been themselves, then invalidated, by bad
    training or by counter-data or something of this sort, that
    you've had any loses at all.
     
    Now I'm not trying to tell you you might have known all
    this before. That would be a little bit too much. That
    would be me bowing out of the picture too much. I have done
    a re-evaluation of materials, a re-evaluation of add-ups,
    and that is a very definite part of the speed which you
    attain in them. These materials have been groomed within an
    inch of their lives, really. And this of course is not
    something that one normally sees. When one is trained in
    some subject he does not see the amount of research or
    testing, or other things that go on with it. Well that's
    all been there too. But if you notice you have not been
    trained anything that was very contrary to anything in your
    training. It's more main line than otherwise. But you
    certainly have shed a lot of complexities that somebody or
    another has given you.
     
    The main, the thing that you will run into is the fact that
    auditing is a team action. It's a team action. It requires
    the Ethics Officer and the HCO Exec Sec and the Org Exec
    Sec and the Qual Sec. and the this one and the that one,
    and the promotions people and the this, and so on, and the
    handling it up. What I expect you to do, what I expect you
    to do is set and hold the standard, and continue to go
    forward with the standard. And by doing that, and by doing
    that consistently, set up examples of what can be done, and
    continue to set up those examples of what can be done, so
    that people eventually realize that that's what can be
    done. And then they start doing it too. That I do expect
    you to do.
     
    And I know you'll do that. It has been an all night, all
    day proposition of training the first Org VIIIs. You have
    had some fairly damp times of it. I have had some rather
    snarly times. I have never read, my C/S 7, the LRH Comm
    staff has never made the tape of me snarling over some of
    these folders, and so forth, but she often threatened to do
    so. Because some of them were pretty gruesome. I mean the
    snarls, not much the folders. And somehow or another we
    would bring it all off, and somehow or another, why,
    amongst us we seem to have gotten through with it. And you
    all made it for which I thank you very much.
     
    Now you've contributed a great deal to this class. You have
    made the grade in more ways than one. And I appreciate very
    much what you've done. And I respect you a great deal for
    coming here and going through the lineup, and coming out
    the other end victorious. And for that I wish to thank you.
     
    Thank you very much.
     
     
    *************
    
     

    Track this thread for me

    Subscribe to alt.religion.scientology
    Mail this message to a friend
    View original Usenet format
    Post Reply

    << Previous in search   ·   Next in search >>

    Search Discussions
      For a more detailed search go to Power Search
    Search only in: People >> Humanities >> Theology
    All Deja.com
    Search for:
    Search  messages

     Arts & Entertainment   Automotive   Computing & Tech   Health   Money 
     News   People   Recreation   Sports   Travel 
    SHOPPING - Yellow Pages - Long Distance Deals - Free Stuff - Trade with Datek - Go to Gigabuys! - GET IT NOW @ NECX - FREE downloads! - Get FREE Health Info@drkoop.com - Apartments.com - eBay Auctions

    Copyright © 1999 Deja.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Trademarks · Terms & Conditions of Use · Site Privacy Statement.

    Advertise with Us!  |  About Deja.com