deja.com
Please visit our sponsor
Explore by clicking here
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
 Home  »  People  »  Humanities
 >>  Theology 
fz bible 14/19
Explore More:

The Ultimate Directory
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

Classifieds
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

Price Comparison
Cool stuff from InfoSpace

5¢ long distance!
Save $$$$$.

The Best of ZDNet
Delivered to you free!

Earth's Biggest Selection
Shop at Amazon.com

Rate it!
Ancestral Quest
or choose another to rate
(1=worst, 5=best)
Features
15
Ease of use
15
Performance
15
Cost / Benefit
15

  • Compare it to others
  • User Comments
     
  • top rated
    Genealogy Software
    1. Legacy Family Tree
    2. The Master Genealogist
    3. Brother's Keeper
    4. Reunion
    5. Family Tree Maker Deluxe Edition III
  • See the full list...
  • Deja Forums
    Atheism
    Atheism
    Atheism
    Satirical atheism
    Atheism
     
    Deja Communities
    IUCISD
    Public Participation
    Academy of the Immortal Spirit
    Human Origins Forum
    The Thundernet Group

    Start your own community in Theology.  

    My Deja
    Get more out of Deja: Register to easily manage your discussions and communities, and improve your searches. Plus, get email alerts about new posts in your favorite discussions with Deja Tracker!
     
      discussions     ratings     communities  
      back to search results 
    Help | Feedback
    >> Community
    Next in Search
       >> Forum: alt.religion.scientology
          >> Thread: FZ Bible 14/19 CLASS 8 TAPES
            >> Message 1 of 17
     
    Subject:FZ Bible 14/19 CLASS 8 TAPES
    Date:1999/07/03
    Author:Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
      Posting History Post Reply

    FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
     
    CLASS VIII TAPE TRANSCRIPTS 14/19
     
    **************************************************
     
    CLASS VIII TAPE TRANSCRIPTS - CONTENTS
     
    01  SEP 24, 1969 WELCOME TO THE CLASS VIII COURSE
    02  SEP 25, 1969 WHAT STANDARD TECH DOES
    03  SEP 26, 1969 THE LAWS OF CASE SUPERVISION
    04  SEP 27, 1969 STANDARD TECH DEFINED
    05  SEP 28, 1969 THE STANDARD GREEN FORM AND RUDIMENTS
    06  SEP 29, 1969 MECHANICS OF TECHNIQUES AND SUBJECT MATTER
    07  SEP 30, 1969 CASE SUPERVISOR DO'S AND DONT'S:
    08  OCT  1, 1969 CERTAINTY OF STANDARD TECH
    09  OCT  2, 1969 THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING
    10  OCT  3, 1969 ASSISTS
    11  OCT  7, 1969 ASSESSMENT AND LISTING BASICS
    12  OCT  8, 1969 MORE ON BASICS
    13  OCT  9, 1969 ETHICS AND CASE SUPERVISION
    14  OCT 10, 1969 AUDITOR ATTITUDE AND THE BANK
    15  OCT 11, 1969 AUDITORS ADDITIVES, LISTS AND CASE SUPERVISION
    16  OCT 12, 1969 STANDARD TECH
    17  OCT 13, 1969 THE BASICS AND SIMPLICITY OF STANDARD TECH
    18  OCT 14, 1969 THE NEW AUDITOR'S CODE
    19  OCT 15, 1969 AN EVALUATION OF EXAMINATION ANSWERS
     
     
    **************************************************
     
    STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
     
    Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
    Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
     
    The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
    Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
    copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
     
    They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians,
    Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
     
    The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
    of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
     
    We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
    to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
     
    But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
    the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
    testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 
     
    We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
    as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
    without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
     
    We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
    not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
    that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
    to aid us for that reason.
     
    Thank You,
     
    The FZ Bible Association
     
    **************************************************
     
    6810C10 Class VIII TAPE 14
     
     
    AUDITOR ATTITUDE AND THE BANK
     
    Good evening. (Good evening) We have here the what number
    lecture? (Fourteen.) Fourteenth lecture, and the date? Ten,
    ten, sixty eight, or eighteen.
     
    OK. This evening I'm going to talk to you about the art of
    being an auditor. This of course is totally dependent upon
    art. There is no rules about it. One has the knack or he
    doesn't. There's no reason why PCs get well. Rather
    mysterious thing. It has to do with the auditors' aura. The
    foregoing...  have actually been stated by people who were
    pretending to teach Dianetics. The general opinion of
    psychiatry and other mental practitioners of a decade or so
    ago was that, "Well Hubbard can do it but he has no
    business teaching somebody else, because you see it's a
    knack somebody has, and of wf wf wf wf. We have no doubt
    but what he has found is very good psychiatry, don't you wf
    waffa waffa waffa waft. What a hell of an insult that was.
     
    So anyway, the net result of all of this is that the
    general difficulty with which an individual is faced is
    normally somebody else can do it, he is a good auditor, I
    wonder what magical knack he has. What is it? What is it?
    And that's what causes you cats to pick up a bunch of
    hidden data. You think somebody else knows something
    peculiar that you possibly may not know.
     
    You see? And you see Oscar Q. Zilch, and he seems to get
    results on the PC, so you want to find out what he does,
    you see, because you flubbed it. And then he says, "Waffle
    waffle, yiggle yaggle, buckle, buckle", and he doesn't know what the hell he's doing. And he probably isn't getting
    results from the PC. He's probably just giving a sales talk
    anyhow. And the net result of all of that is that mystery
    about it.
     
    Well, the subject of auditing is first recounted in a book
    called The Original Thesis. And the rule has not changed
    between 1949 and now. The Original Thesis is prior to
    Dianetics the Modern Science of Mentai Heaith. And I was
    glancing through it a moment ago and the last editor of it
    has not punched this up into the caps it deserves.
     
    The reason why auditing can occur is that PC plus the
    auditor is greater than the PCs bank. The PC versus the
    auditor and the bank is overwhelmed. Now think it over for
    a minute and you'll see that the law has not changed in all
    these years. And you speak about basics. That is the most
    basic basic there is in auditing.
     
    The PCs awareness plus the auditors' awareness concentrated
    upon the reactive bank is greater than the bank. Inevitably
    and invariably. As an individual moves up into the upper OT
    sections, if he has made it into those sections, then he
    himself, all by himself is greater than the strength and
    power of his bank. This is peculiarly true then in the
    lower grades that it takes the auditor plus the PC as you
    would might add up ohms or volts or anything else, you
    know? Like the auditors volts plus the PCs volts are
    greater than the volts of the bank. Do you follow? It's
    that, you know? The auditors' apples plus the PCs apples
    are greater than the counter apples of the bank. Do you
    follow? It's just arithmetically true.
     
    And if you have the auditor versus the PC, then it is the
    auditor plus the bank is versus the PC.
     
    And he may already be only one grasshopper power, and so
    it's very easy to blow him down.
     
    You can tell at once when the auditor is not with the PC,
    or when the PC, solo auditing, is not enough to blow down
    his own bank, because the TA goes low.
     
    Whenever you see a TA sinking in an auditing session it is
    the auditor is versus the PC. The auditor and the bank are
    both united against the PC. And the result is a sinking
    tone arm. Now when the PC himself hits too much area in the
    bank that is a hell of an overwhelm of some kind or
    another, this is the solo auditor, his TA goes low. So in
    an AO you will very soon see C/S on sessions. C/S on solo
    sessions, where the TA taken on a two hand electrode system
    has sunk below 2, the PC has not adequately made it up
    through the grades to be greater than his own bank. And
    therefore he should be audited to straighten out his case,
    to remove the charge which stands in his road, to repair
    the grade we missed, to put in the rudiments that were out
    during all of those sessions. Do you follow? Now by putting
    in the rudiments, getting the charge off of ARC breaks and things he's had with himself, straightening him out, relatively simple. Nothing very, very complex. It's contained in the phrase at Class VIII, it's just fly each rud to F/N. The technique that is used
    is itsa, earlier similar itsa. Complicated, isn't it? Now
    if you however have ever seen a D/N, a dirty needle on the
    PC in the body of the session, your TRs stink to high
    heaven. Because the bank never makes a D/N all by itself.
    You can, immediately and directly then measure your ability
    as an auditor of uniting with the PC to handle his bank by
    the cleanness of the needle in the major actions of the
    session. Expect a needle to go D/N in the Ruds. We expect
    it to. We hit missed withhold it for sure will. But to have
    this happen in the body of the session means that the
    auditors' TRs went out. Now his TRs went out is another way
    of saying he ceased to be with the PC.
     
    Now we can give you the cycle of communication. We can gave
    you all of the various actions which you have to do. But
    there's one action which remains with the auditor. Is he
    versus the PC? Is he on the other football team? Is the
    cowboy somebody in the black hat sitting across the table
    from him? See? Is he trying to help the PC get through the
    bank or isn't he? Now I one time pulled a little series of
    stunts which were quite fascinating. I took in an HCG every
    time an auditor was going to audit a PC. I took him aside.
    And I pulled his withholds from the PC. And then sent him
    in to give a session. The funny part of it is that those
    who had withholds from a PC and who did not get them off
    gave a poorer session than the auditor who did not have,
    who had just had his withholds from a PC flipped out of the
    road before he audited the PC. We used to get very splendid
    sessions by doing this trick. I'm not recommending this
    trick. This was a research experiment. Because it simply
    meant that the PC was being audited by somebody whose
    rudiments were out on the PC. In other words the auditors'
    rudiments were out on the PC. He wasn't with the PC, he was
    withholding himself from the PC. Do you see how elementary
    that is?
     
    Now I'm not saying that is always the case. I'm just giving
    you this as one little special example. Now you don't have
    to climb inside the PCs head, although I would expect a
    Class VIII auditor to be able to audit somebody at four,
    five feet, without saying a word, and if he really polished
    himself up well, to audit somebody on the other side of the
    world without any trouble at all. I'm not giving you
    anything esoteric. You'll find occasionally in trying to
    audit a body thetan somebody who has not been up through
    the grades and doesn't know what he's doing, can't make one
    move. He tries to make the body thetan move and the body
    thetan moves him. You know? Ho. He's sort of telepaths the
    body thetan to the beginning of the incident.
     
    That's why they fall back so easily on patter. It's a
    wonder they don't pull up a chair on the other side of
    their desk to have the body thetan sit down in. Pretty
    queer. But there isn't any real difference between auditing
    a body thetan telepathically through the material he has to
    be audited through to blow him, and to straighten him out,
    and then those body thetans of course are straightened out,
    oddly enough.
     
    There is no difference between doing that and auditing a PC
    sitting across from you in the lower grades. As you audit
    them you are auditing a composite. And the processes which
    you use are those processes which work on a composite
    being. The PC is himself. He isn't a cluster, as I've heard
    some people saying. He is a being, however, who is impeded
    and cross-ordered by a number of other beings who have
    caved in and who aren't in control of the body, but are
    just there. But now that's a telepathic action. Zoooom
    through the bank, and mfafmf, mfmfm. There's no patter
    involved in it.
     
    Now if this guy is three feet away from him and is called a
    PC, he merely has the complexity that he's trying to audit
    a more composite being. And he should be able to make the
    PC do exactly the things he can make the body thetan do. He
    should be able to audit somebody in the next county. And
    why is it that I was always able to tell the auditor what
    the item would be before the PC listed it? It was no trick.
    It isn't even a trick of reading minds. But it is something
    on the order of horsepower. See what I mean?
     
    So we take this fellow. He hasn't been up through the
    grades at all. He's just a fake. And he, "Oh yeah, well I
    got all my grades in Brisbane. Ha ha, yeah. Got my grades
    in Brisbane," and he's been through the Clearing Course,
    couldn't find anything. And so forth. And it all blew to
    F/N. And you all of a sudden get hold of him and he's got a
    stage four needle, that's going up tick, pow, tick. Ooh.
    Now the chance that he will be able to audit a body thetan
    is so remote that you may as well forget it. That's why the
    grades are arranged that way.
     
    Now very often a person who has been audited well up
    through the grades gets to clear. There are lots of cases
    of this. Gets to clear, and he finds out there's some other
    beings here. You know? What the hell's this? What's this?
    You know? Well his reality has been raised up to the point
    of where he knows he's supposed to be, and some of those
    characters know they're running OT2 out of these beings,
    and auditing 3 is just a breeze. There is nothing much to it.
     
    Do you follow?
     
    This is, this is what's known as impingement and effect
    upon other beings. Now you will find here and there that
    somebody has tried to audit a body thetan that he has been
    mad at. It didn't work! And you get him in review, or
    something. And you find out that he has actually ARC
    broken, overrun, busted up every body thetan he had
    anything to do with. "You... I'll get you. Where the
    hell... Rrrr! Rrr!" Nothing happened. Or he got one
    awful kickback. He's auditing out of ARC. Did it myself
    way back when. Ran across somebody who was actually one of
    the R-6ers. And I thought to hell with you, bud. I ain't
    gonna audit you. And that was that as far as I was
    concerned. About four days later, why, he showed up again.
    He was awfully caved in. So I had to pick up the ARC break
    and audit it out. Do you understand? Auditing requires
    unlimited tolerance and charity.
     
    Now you get somebody whose writing very evaluative C/Ses. I
    reserve the right to say this guy has simply fallen on his
    head. He has had too much waggle waggle and bug bug, and so
    forth. But if you will go back through the fellows'
    auditing, or go into the intelligence files you'll find out
    that I'm not picking it up on the air waves. He said it two
    days before in his auditing session. But you don't find me
    saying, "This is a horrible bum, this is a dog. He really
    ought to be shot but somehow or another we will audit him." Because the funny part of it is, he won't respond as a PC
    if you have that attitude in session. A C/S could have that
    attitude, but if he colors the auditors' attitude too much
    toward the PC, then you get auditor plus bank, versus PC.
    And the auditing becomes very difficult and very slow. Do
    you see where we're going with this? See? Well it's elementary.
     
    Now nobody enjoins upon you that you've got to have a halo
    eighteen kw around your skull, or anything like that. It
    comes under the heading of the auditor who, the auditor
    should be able to say who he audits. And an auditor should
    be able to refuse a PC. He doesn't think he can help him is
    a nice way of saying he probably has overts on. He doesn't
    like him and doesn't want to have anything to do with him.
    Now that auditor auditing that PC is not going to get very
    many gains.
     
    You're dealing not with an art. You're dealing with a very
    crystal clear proposition, that the PC can overcome and
    handle his bank if the auditor is with him, and the PC has
    a hell of a time when the auditor is not. When the auditor
    is against him it becomes impossible. Somebody auditing
    somebody in anger can actually spin them. I had a girl
    stumble into my office one time that had been audited in
    anger. Or I think she more or less walked for about, I
    don't know, something on the order of fifteen hundred miles
    to get to my office. Somebody'd audited her in a rage. Spun
    her. She had enough sense to go someplace where somebody
    could help her. I straightened her out, rather rapidly as a
    matter of fact. But then the auditor and the bank combined
    caved in a being that wasn't too well off to begin with.
    That's why my lip curls at the whole subject of psychiatry,
    psychoanalysis. Invalidative subjects. Psychology, man is
    an animal. This sort of thing. Because you see, I know they
    don't work because they bust the first axiom. It's not the
    first axiom, but they bust the first datum that was put out
    strongly on the subject of auditing.
     
    Therefore it comes back to this. What is Class VIII
    auditing? It is auditing the PC with good TRs. Now, do you
    sit there and say, "Let's see now. I have to love this PC.
    Therefore I'm womp womp womp womp womp. You're gonna audit
    over a hell of a false line. All you gotta have is just
    willing to help him out, that's all. If you're willing to
    help him out you're OK. And if you know how to help him out
    you're very OK. And if your TRs are very smooth they will
    stem from those other two points. If your TRs are smooth.
     
    Now this is very, very fascinating, and sometimes very
    bewildering. You say, "Well how would I know? How would I
    know?" I can tell you how I policed and drilled myself
    along this line. It might be rather surprising to you that
    I drilled myself along the lines of auditing. I have had to
    learn better than any auditor was taught that I was
    teaching any of the techniques or mechanics, the model
    sessions, the prep checks, the sec checks, had to learn the
    TRs better than those I was teaching. Naturally. And that I
    sat down and didn't drill them out of thin air.
     
    But I actually did sit down and drill them. And every time
    auditing styles had changed, and they have, why I'd drill
    myself into the new auditing style. Well that's
    interesting. It's interesting to do.
     
    I was getting good results on PCs in 1948, '49, '50. I was
    solving PCs other auditors couldn't solve. Not because I
    was doing something different. I was running engrams and so
    forth on them. I was running at a gradient they could
    tolerate. And I was very willing to help them. That was the
    main difference I wasn't in any contest with them. I was
    very willing to help.
     
    Now, what, what was the difference? You can say
    comprehension of the subject. Well what comprehension is
    there of the subject? It's the same basics you know now. As
    cases have gone up the line, and as things have been
    learned, as grades advanced up along the line, why what I
    have known has been applied. I don't have any trouble
    auditing somebody at a distance. The only reason you don't,
    is it just hasn't occurred to you you could! And when you
    try to audit somebody into it at a distance, yes audit
    their Ruds out, and you don't audit them properly.
     
    And they very often are stuck on the track to begin with.
    And they're also being distracted in various ways. But it
    can be done.
     
    Now you can actually move an animal around on a time track
    in the wildest, and most imaginable fashion. Not because
    he's an animal, but because his time track is so different
    that it doesn't, in the least bit, bring any question about
    your imagining it. You are not, I am sure, on a greedy
    quest for bones. Nor are you terrified of your master
    beating you. Set when we run some savage dog backwards on
    the time track we'll encounter unmistakably what he is
    stuck in. It's often very interesting to see what they are
    stuck in. Most incredible things. And it is so different
    from a zone of one's own experience that one can evaluate
    what he's doing, and others. But this, this you could say
    is trick stuff. No, no it ain't, it ain't. It isn't at all
    trick. It is about as common as eating a dish of ice cream.
    Now you say, "Well I couldn't do that. I don't know." And so on. Yes. An individual who is surrounded around by a
    tremendous number of body thetans, his own case is shaky,
    his own rudiments are out. When he tries to do something or
    other he restimulates his own ridges or those of the body
    thetans in his immediate vicinity, and he doesn't get very
    far. In other words, he's introverted.
     
    Now because a lower class auditor is therefore impeded,
    hence his extension is poor, you then teach him by form.
    You teach him by form that he does so and so, and he does
    so and so, and then the responses are so and so, and the
    responses are so and so. You teach him these forms and
    actions. Now the funny part of it is that no matter how
    good he gets, these forms and actions are still there. Do
    you see the mechanics of it are still there: But you've
    actually given him something that he can do on a
    communication line. Now I'm not saying that you as a Class
    VIII ought to be able to run somebody through to OT6, or
    something of this sort, without ever speaking to him,
    without his knowing anything about it. This is not the game
    I'm talking to you about. But sitting across the table from
    somebody, sitting across the table from somebody, and this
    is the only point I'm making. If you get any other point
    out of this, wow. It's the only point I am making. Your
    intention is actually capable of holding him from moving on
    the time track. Particularly at his state of case. And you
    can hold him up and freeze him right on the time track.
     
    You go out and try to audit somebody who is a very wog wog.
    And you'd absolutely be fascinated. You'd absolutely be
    fascinated. An auditor has always verbally been able to
    handle the PCs' bank and make it move around better than
    the PC. Always. Now you can actually establish a zone of
    freeze. "Well I'm going to help the PC, I suppose that
    doesn't register on him." You doubt he can get back that
    far into the incident. I suppose that doesn't register,
    huh? "Well I don't know if I can help you or not. I don't
    know if I'm doing right." Now get, get what somebody might
    be doing. I don't say that they're doing this. But think of
    what they might be doing. "Jesus Christ, I hope I've got
    this right. Guess I'd better catch up my administration,
    that's all. I've got to get this this time." And so on.
    "Well if he doesn't see how nervous I am about this, yes." "Move to the beginning of the, of the incident." If it doesn't register in his voice it's gonna register
    otherwise. "Recall", let me see, what the hell was the command? "Just a minute. Just a minute. Sorry. Uh, recall,
    what the hell was it?" Well now if your actions didn't make him nervous your think also could. You start running on a
    PC some time the same button that you've just been assessed
    on. Then you make an effort to stay into PT. And he can't
    go back track. See, we've both been assessed, let us say,
    on catfish.
     
    See? And you say, "Recall catfish, ha?" And he says,
    (Laughter). That doesn't mean you should travel all over
    the time track, it just means that you should be free of
    catfish at that moment.
     
    Now all I'm trying to tell you is there is a communication
    line there. It's demonstrable with body thetans, so
    therefore I'm talking to you in your zone, where you can
    grab a reality on it, that it's therefore three feet away
    possible, it's therefore, actually, a lot of feet away
    possible, and it's beyond range of sight, in actual fact.
    It is not something one does without knowing he's doing it.
    It isn't an accidental activity. It is intentional. I
    imagine somebody could be real kooky and be in some kind of
    a telepathic-type of rapport, but then you must be in some
    telepathic report from body thetans 'cause you can see
    their pictures. Well if you can see their pictures they're
    communicating with you.
     
    Now you look at somebody who suddenly walks through that
    door. You don't necessarily see his pictures. Mostly
    because you don't look. But the point I'm trying to make is
    here, there is a communication line. And it's not because
    you are everybody and everybody is you, because that's a
    damn lie. It is a communication line. We use the MEST
    universe, and we use verbalization, and we use pieces of
    MEST to make the communication positive. One of the reasons
    communication has to be made so positive is elementary.
    That is because there's so much cross think here and there,
    it sounds like the Tower of Babel. All you have to do is
    walk into a crowded room where people are excited or upset,
    and you get a kickback from it.
     
    Obvious.
     
    I used to think there was something terribly wrong with me
    because I didn't like people around who were miserable or
    unhappy or something, and I thought this was something
    wrong with me, you see, that is must have something to do
    with the restimulation of me, because of that.
     
    This is way, way back when. I ran into this, and so on, and
    it'd make me feel miserable, you know? I'd look at this
    person, he'd be miserable. And I'd say, "Well god, I must
    have a lot of misery on my track", and so forth. You see
    how complicated it all was. You know? I had it all figured
    out, it must be restimulating some sort of an incident, and
    it's then therefore wha wha waffle waffle. Imagine my
    amazement one fine day when my reality had gotten up to the
    reason I didn't like to see people miserable is because
    they felt miserable. Very complicated, see? (Laughter) And
    it was something like fingernails on the black board or
    something. And then I came up to a point where I was
    perfectly willing to look at somebody who was miserable.
    And I didn't have to feel he was miserable. And I could
    feel how miserable he was. And if I got in that frame of
    mind I could also move him to a point of track, you know...
    Put him in some other point of track.
     
    I had a big failure doing this one time with an animal who
    was barking and snarling and raising the living daylights.
    And I thought, "I don't like you. I think I'll move you
    into an engram. Make you shut up." Funny part of it is I did move him into an engram. But the funny part of it was I couldn't move him before the engram. And this puzzled me a very great
    deal. I pondered on this for a while. What was wrong here? Well it was because I was mad at him to begin with.
     
    (Laughter) There was no ARC. I wasn't willing to help him,
    I was trying to ruin him. Every time I walked by, why he
    shattered my ear drums with a psychotic lot of yowp, yowp,
    yowp, you know? And I thought, "The hell with you, see, I'm gonna move you into an engram and shut you up." I moved him alright. He went in, he went into an engram, but then I
    couldn't move him ahead of the engram. I could restimulate
    something bad with him, but I couldn't restimulate anything
    good. I was mad at him.
     
    So there is a communication line. And it is not very
    airy-fairy. At the level a Class VIII is you will start
    getting a reality on that communication line. Now you'll
    get a failure here and there of putting through a positive
    communication. You wonder why that is, and so on. The
    waitress won't come over to you, and so on. You start
    asking yourself what was your attitude toward the waitress
    when you tried to make her come over there? And all will be
    explained.
     
    Now, therefore there is this thing called a communication.
    And it is a communication. Now communication goes on its'
    own formula lines, and so on. There are various types and
    ways of handling something. There's permeation, there's
    communication, there's intentionedness with the thing, and
    so on. These are all upper OT track facilities and
    abilities. They explain such weird things as engines run
    for some people and they don't run for others. And so on.
    Well the engine runs for somebody else, not because he's
    got any magic beam on it, because when he looks at the
    engine he knows, don't you see? And he says, "Well any
    crazy fool could see that you haven't got the throttle
    open. You know? You haven't turned on the ignition." You
    see? But how does he know that so suddenly? Well I'll give
    you some idea that actually woggle-boggles our own
    engineers. I can call the shots in our engine room without
    going into the engine room. And the engines run fine.
     
    Once in a while I give up if it's too far away and the
    communication line is too bad, and so forth, and I've given
    the directions too many times, and they really don't get
    followed, and something else is happening the whole time
    while they're trying to put the thing out of communication
    faster than they're putting it in. I'll say, "To hell with
    it." See, I'm also willing not to win all the time.
     
    Now if you're anxious, I'm not holding myself up as any
    model here, I'm just giving you a framework, if you're
    anxious and questioning your own abilities, then you see
    you've got to win every time to prove to yourself you're
    alright. See? I've gotta...  And this in itself will cancel
    out a certain amount of communication. Now just in the last
    week, how many times have you spoken to somebody casually
    who didn't answer you? You see? Well it happens in MEST
    communication, which is MEST communication because it's
    very positive. Well it'll certainly happen on this other
    communication line. You don't have to prove to yourself you
    have these great powers. I get angry sometimes when a piece
    of MEST won't move. And then I realize what I'm doing.
    'Cause that's why it won't move.
     
    Now these, you're moving up into OT capabilities. These are
    not as complex. In fact they're much simpler. It is the
    additive of anger, the additive of necessity, the additive
    of pressing it home, the additive, the additive, the
    additive. Do you see? Now I can tell you how to mock up a
    planet. See? Any damn fool thetan can mock up a planet. The
    action is, it's too easy. You haven't actually scaled your
    effort down to a point where you can do it again. Do I
    start making sense' It's the effort and complexity.
     
    Now you can get this idea. Well to mock up a planet, for
    Christ almighty. Let me see. It's got to have a core, and
    it's got to have swamp, and it's got to have wuf wuf wuf,
    wuf wuf, and then have veins and mountains, there's so much
    water over on the planet. Let me see. Now the proportion of
    the water should be about two-thirds to three quarters
    water, and the rest of it would be land, so that the
    atmospheric pressure, and that should be about three
    hundred miles, and it should be so, and so on, and...  Aw
    nuts! Any damn fool thetan knows what a planets consist of.
    You know? It's just...  You get it?
     
    Now in studying Class VIII you are actually experiencing
    this phenomena with Scientology.
     
    You've thought of Scientology as very complex here, very
    complex there. And very difficult and hard to grasp, and
    there's an awful lot of rules and it's awf awf awf awf awf,
    and a terrific amounts being demanded of you, and so on.
    And I hope you are learning at Class VIII level that the
    simpler it is the easier it is. It's very, that's a funny
    remark. It's, it actually isn't encompassible with words.
    It's just, well the easier it is the simpler it is, the
    things you have to know are very few, actually. And you
    just do those few and do those in simple fashion, it all
    comes out alright. It's a thing you experience. It's a
    thing you suddenly know. That's it. Pow, pow, pow, pow, pow...
     
    Now you can keep a check on yourself how good you are.
    There is a way you can keep a check on how good you are.
    The length of sessions is inversely proportional to the
    ability of the auditor. The longer the session the poorer
    the auditor. The shorter the session, for a number of
    actions, the better the auditor. Actions successfully
    completed, length of time. How long does it take you to get
    through a C/S?
     
    Now you say, "Well I don't want this PC because he's tough, and this other PC and he's easy", and so forth. There are
    no tough or easy PCs. They're just you as the auditor. He's
    at different levels of case. Some of them are worser and
    some of them are better. Alright, that's a hell of a way to
    fail, see? Some PCs are bad PCs, some PCs are good PCs.
    Nonsense. That isn't, nothing to it. It's not true.
     
    Some PCs are at different grades than other PCs. Now you,
    when these grades are labelled, they're very often
    inexpertly labelled. We say this person is a grade four. I
    have seen some of the woggiest grade fours you ever saw,
    and I've seen some of the highest tone grade fours you ever
    saw. Do you understand? And in the highest tone grade fours
    you ever saw, they were very expertly audited up through
    their grades, and the woggiest grade fours that you ever
    saw were not audited on their grades at all. And they were
    wogs. And somebody'd given a lick and a promise, hadn't
    even, you know, really, they never even sat down. The worst
    ones off had never been in the auditing chair at all.
     
    Somebody comes along, therefore the falsity of grade
    assignment gets in our road in the estimation of the case.
    And you are gonna be surprised sometime to find a person
    who is allegedly at OT 5, who is not in actual fact even at
    ARC Straightwire. The phenomenon actually can occur. All
    the grade auditing was done on a body thetan. And he's
    gone. (Laughter.) It isn't often you will find this.
     
    But actually the difficulty of the case is simply where the
    case is, how charged is the case, what grades and actions
    have to be put in on the case. That's all. But that, that's
    the only difference amongst cases. Then once you get that
    straight, why you're great. Because yours is not a social
    response. You're not being responsible for his social
    conduct. You merely know that after he has been audited he
    will fall on his head ethicswise if his auditing was
    incorrect. And this is usual. You get into trouble with
    ethics if his auditing is out. You could almost show this.
    If you want to get somebody in trouble with ethics, why
    just give him the wrong item on a couple of lists, and let
    it go at that, and they'll wind up over in ethics all too
    frequently. You can determine it to that degree.
     
    Now that doesn't mean everybody in ethics has been badly
    audited. Their life has been badly lived. Very often. Their
    rudiments have been out too long in life. They are living
    over outrudiments. And they'll get in trouble with ethics.
     
    Now what, what then, what then is one striving to achieve?
    He is simply striving to achieve simplicity. He is striving
    to achieve not a fixed attitude, but an attitude which will
    not impede the PC from making progress. He doesn't even
    have to really be helpful. If fact you can get so helpful
    you wreck the PC. But your TRs mustn't, at least, impede
    the PC. And now, there's another method by which you can
    check up your own auditing ability.
     
    Back around '62 I was working with this method - It's a very
    interesting method. If you get a D/N on a PC while you are
    handling a major action you stink. I mean to put it
    crudely, because it's crude. If, after you have left the
    rudiments, and are into any major action, you were to have
    appear before you on your meter a D/N, you stink. Your TRs
    are out. I've checked this out very thoroughly. I can
    guarantee this. There isn't an engram known to man or beast
    that can turn on a D/N. You can run a person through
    engrams by the hat full, and they won't turn on any D/Ns.
    The read might tighten to a bit as he thinks the think, but
    actually it just flows along.
     
    It never goes D/N. The only person it goes D/N on is the
    auditor.
     
    It works like this. You can check it up. You can check it
    up yourself. You see a little tick of the meter, you
    haven't given it a chance to go D/N. It all of a sudden
    goes tick, you did something or other, and there's that
    tick. Now you can get in the way of the PC doing this, too.
    But if you were to ask the PC at that moment, "Did
    something just happen that upset you in any way?" The PC
    would say, "Yes." And it'd blow off. You can keep track of your own TRs, man. If, in TR drills, the needle dirties up
    in any way whatsoever, the auditor is goofing it. If any
    D/N turns on during a drill you've goofed it.
     
    Now if your ability to audit, your willingness to help the
    PC are there, the PC is not an unmanageable, unpredictable
    thing. It would not be good to do so, but you could even
    set yourself up the problem of pushing him through it with
    his ruds out. As a matter of fact, the perfect auditing
    session is one in which the auditor is not even faintly
    lntuded into the pcs' attention. The PC is totally unaware
    of the auditor or the environment, and is only aware of his
    bank and his action. And that makes the fastest session.
    The most expert session are that one which has the maximum
    gains. Not aware of the auditor at all.
     
    So if the auditor's trying to show off, or do something or
    other that is interesting, or interest the PC, or all kinds
    of kooky things the auditor could do, they're all simply
    distracting. So the best TRs are those which distract the
    least, and get the action done the most smoothly.
     
    So if an auditor's willing to help the PC, and if the
    needle remains clean and flowing, you haven't got anything
    out. The PC just gonna go along just great. That's your own
    self check. I give it to you as...
     
    It's all very well to have other people blowing down your
    necks, and things happening to you because of this, that
    and the other thing, but the truth is, the truth is that
    you are probably your own most savage critic. Probably your
    own most savage critic. Matter of fact I, possibly you
    could look forward to the time when the auditor goofs in
    the auditing session, when he ends off the session, why he
    runs out and jumps overboard. (Laughter)
     
    The upshot of it all is simply this. That if you yourself
    do not have an awareness of what you are doing, and a
    critical eye of your own actions, it is improbable that you
    will ever improve.
     
    You can be persuaded, however, to have a critical eye
    towards your own actions. One is not trying to introvert
    you. Anybody who learns to audit in this school, the Sea
    Org school, is never likely to let go of it, or be scared
    of anything when he finishes it up. Because we are now at
    the moment down in the ancient civilizations, and so on, it
    is quite amusing to realize that we are also practicing the
    stoic philosophic school. The stoic was able to endure.
     
    Now with that preliminary there is a thing called auditing
    presence, there is a thing called auditing intention, and
    there is a thing called TRs, and the conditions of the
    session are those which I've just described to you, and are
    in actual fact no greater than those I have just described
    to you. They do not exceed those things I have just
    described to you. There aren't a hundred and fifty nine
    thousand others. Those are the conditions and attitudes of
    a session.
     
    Now when you add to that a meter, and when you add to that
    administration, you're making a sort of a one man band
    action. Correct? Now if you had any difficulty handling an
    E-meter, or any difficulty with an administrative action,
    you are, of course, detracting from the amount of cool
    invested in the session. An auditor has to be a sort of a
    one man band. He's got a meter to run, and he's got
    administration to keep up, and he's got a PC to handle, and
    he's also in charge of the whole environment around him, which
    many auditors forget. And as a result it is a multiple of actions.
     
    Now let me tell you how you make a multiple of actions
    become simple. Is you learn to do each one perfectly and
    then learn to do them all together. For instance, just to
    put a ridiculous line on it, if there was any difficulty,
    sometime you eat these eskimo pies and things like this,
    and they're very hard to eat on a summer day, without getting
    them all over your shirt. They melt.
     
    When you bite the chocolate, why the inside squirts.
    Requires a bit of skill to eat an eskimo pie, so as to one,
    be able to eat all of the pie and not leave part of it on
    the ground, and to keep your shirt clean at the same time
    and not get it all over your face. That requires a certain
    amount of skill.
     
    Now it requires a certain amount of skill to fire a sub
    machine gun. To get any accuracy with a sub machine gun it
    usually has to be supported with two hands. One sights
    along it in some fashion or another. He does this, that and
    the other thing. But if he was going to be doing something
    else at the same time he had certainly better learn how to
    handle a sub machine gun rather easily. So, if you could
    learn how to eat an eskimo pie and fire a sub machine gun
    with deadly accuracy into a target at the same time,
    without getting any eskimo pie on your shirt, without
    shooting anybody else but the target, and all the time with
    tremendous aplomb. You've got an action there which is less
    complicated than auditing. You have to recognize this, the
    fact you've got several things to do. But a thetan can do
    several things at the same time. If you don't believe it,
    hold up your hand and look at it. Have you any idea of how
    much, how much think and action and complexity that
    requires? I suppose you think your muscles do it, or
    something. If you're not very far up along the line you
    will. You'll think, "Well I flex my muscles, and then I... " and so on. How is it that you could bring up your hand and
    open it? Why does the thing happen to open? Do you see?
     
    Now you've educated yourself into believing that you have
    to have this hand in order to open the cover of something.
    I don't know what's wrong with you, because you can just as
    easily intentionedly open the cover of something with
    intention. Except you have to be able to permeate the cover
    to the degree that you're willing to permeate your hand.
    That...  I've given you some stuff out of 8. Actually this
    is all the trick there is to moving MEST.
     
    So at first you would say, "Oh my god. How would we reverse the polarity of the Empire State building?" In other words
    it seems to be a big problem. It would seem to be very
    difficult, and so forth. But in actual fact it isn't until
    you recognized the difficultness, not the difficultness of
    it, but the complexity of it and the simplicity of doing
    it, are the two things which you recognize simultaneously,
    and at that moment you could do most anything with the
    Empire State building.
     
    This is all germane to auditing. In a Class VIII auditing
    there is then a style. It's an effortless one man band that
    goes like the mischief and gets it all done and does it all
    very simply and brings it all right out at the other end.
    It adds speed and a deftness to the ability one already has.
     
    But it also requires that one recognizes the simplicity of
    what he is doing before there's real speed and a deftness
    suddenly come to one. There isn't very much to know. And
    that's the trouble with it. It's almost too little to know.
    So it's hard to grasp. The feeling there must be something
    more to it keeps intruding on the fact. And all of a sudden
    fuff...  you do it. Very easily.
     
    Now so much for the attitude of the session. The case
    supervision of the session is what is audited in the
    session. That is what is done by the auditor. And there are
    certain standard things which make Class VIII Class VIII.
    And that is that you insist on nothing short of perfection.
     
    We leave the ground of "the auditor got away with it". We leave that utterly. Almost to we don't care what the final
    result was, if it was done wrong it was wrong. There is no
    optimism, because I can show you in the long run that every
    session that is done wrong gets a PC who falls on his head
    eventually. Your errors of session multiply. And they
    multiply and they are very, because you're auditing
    smoothly you're auditing quickly, something like this, and
    all of a sudden you make a bungle. Baaa. You're the guy
    carrying a flask of TNT in your hip pocket.
     
    Nearly all soup men in oil fields drink it in tea cups and
    that sort of thing. They think it's TNT soup. They handle
    it in the most wild and peculiar fashions. And they faint
    if they see anybody else even going near it. They
    themselves know they can handle the stuff. They themselves
    don't worry about it any. But they recognize that if they
    have dynamite, the soup, it is very explosive.
     
    Now you're auditing rapidly, you're auditing with
    intention, you're already auditing above the ceiling of the
    person to resist the auditing. You already are in a case
    state that can put a person almost anyplace you want to put
    him on the time track, just by plain think, and then you flub.
     
    The only answer to it is you gotta be perfect. If you're
    gonna audit with that much velocity you're gonna have to
    audit perfectly. There must be no flubs. So it is flubless
    style.
     
    Now when we look over, when we look over a well done folder
    it might seem rather mysterious what is in the folder. We
    see a C/S, something on the order of, the C/S on this
    particular one is, G/F, green form. And you do a green form
    to first F/N. You don't do a green form to the second F/N,
    the third F/N, the fourth F/N. It's done to F/N. So it's
    your case supervision is only necessary G/F to F/N. Now you
    haven't seen too many green forms being handed out, and the
    real reason you haven't seen them handed out is most people
    coming in have already been green formed up to their teeth.
    It is not the green form is out of style.
     
    They've just been green formed to their teeth.
     
    Now you actually, as a person starts to hit the upper
    strata of auditing where he has been badly audited early
    on, you start at once to be cautious about lists, about
    getting him to list. I'm not talking about assessments. You
    start being cautious about getting him to do lists, and so on.
     
    That's good C/Sing. You can run all the damn lists you want
    to in the lower grades, you see? But you start getting
    cautious about lists, particularly if you don't have the
    PCs full listing background. If you could go back to the
    basic list on the track and correct it, that would be
    great. But you very often can't do that. Sometimes it's
    above the level and ability of the auditors you have
    auditing for you, to go back and correct the first list
    ever made on the case.
     
    And a list, then, at the upper levels been done too often,
    becomes a risky action. You're putting the PC at risk. All
    he's got to do is get a couple of wrong items, and he'll
    throw into restimulation the earlier list. So you, as a
    case gets on up into the higher levels, the continuous
    ordering of a G/F, G/F, G/F, G/F, G/F, to hell with it.
    He's had G/Fs running out of his ears.
     
    Do you see? But it's a common action. There's nothing wrong
    with it. But you have a tendency, if you're doing C/Sing,
    to look through a folder to find out how many G/Fs this
    character has. You know you haven't got the full folder -
    You never do There's always part of it in Spokane. You look
    through there and you see lists. Here's a great list. Oh,
    that was a good one. Oh, dear god. Where the hell did this
    list come from? (Whistles). Jeez, I never saw that in this
    folder before. I have just opened this folder at random and
    I have found a one, two, three, four, five, six, seven,
    eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen,
    fifteen, sixteen, a sixteen item list, which has been
    nulled down to the fifteenth or down to the twelfth item,
    and it had left in one, two, three, four, five, six, seven
    items reading. This is listed by the PC, not a prepared
    list. And it's a squirrely list. I wouldn't know why
    anybody would have listed it. It's give, quote "me" unquote a name. And it's a sixteen one list. He's had the PC write
    sixteen items, and one, two, three, four, five, six, seven
    stayed in. And he gave the PC one. Ahhh.
     
    Now, when you're doing case supervising work you look into
    these things and you very often see this sort of thing. So,
    you give some sort of a C/S along this line. You know that
    you haven't got the folder. The person's been around for
    seven years and this is only two years ago. It was only
    last year, actually. And you think you've got...  That was
    the earliest list.
     
    That's the earliest list in this folder. The person's been
    around for ages. So, obviously it isn't the earliest list
    on the case.
     
    Now we probably could correct that list. But now we're
    going to get into some kind of a fire fight, because that's
    gonna restimulate this, and it'll restimulate something
    else, and it probably wasn't in restimulation anyhow, and
    the case has long since more or less forgotten that list.
    Do you get the idea? He we start correcting a list which is
    a late list, and then we try to correct something else, and
    we look through the case and we find that the green form on
    January 27, 1967...  God. Look at this green form. LOOK how
    far it went. Didn't F/N. This green form was not run to F/N.
    Now that's something else you could restimulate. Now you could
    run a green form, but here's a backthere green form that didn't F/N. Here's a list that is absolutely kooky. See? You're getting locked out as a C/S. Those are very ordinary actions. See? Listing and nulling, green form, ah boy. We start canceling them
    out. Get the idea? Here's green form after green form after
    green form, list after list after list after list.
     
    The way we actually approach the thing is, go back to a
    time when the case was running well.
     
    How was the case running well? Well the case rehabbed like
    a bomb on the twenty fifth of September. See? F/N, F/N,
    F/N, F/N, F/N. Good indicators. All kinds of F/Ns all over
    the place. Apparent GIs. TA was normal action. So we aren't
    gonna correct back any further than that. Get the think?
    We're not gonna correct back of that. We're not gonna find
    something wrong with the case in 1962. If we are, we're
    gonna find it on a generality. And so, we get a procedure
    of, we take the area, now we've had green forms, there's a
    flubbed green form, there's a flubbed list.
     
    Let's say this case does run into trouble and it's starting
    to fall on its' head. Now we've gone back to the area where
    it was running well, and it comes forward into another area
    and it isn't running well, and it's a little bit difficult
    to figure out why it wouldn't be running well.
     
    Common error is the case doesn't F/N anymore. All of a
    sudden she stops F/Ning, TA goes up, something happens. Now
    we haven't got this area. Now we're being denied our normal
    repair weapons. There's listing, to do an S and D, to do a
    Remedy B. something like this, it's starting to get locked
    out, you see, by earlier bad listing. We haven't got the
    earliest lists. We don't know what one's in restim. You get
    the kind of a case supervisor problem you're being set up
    with? Now all problems of this character come under the
    heading of corrective problems.
     
    The correction problems. So case supervisor problems fall
    into these two characters, and one is corrective, and
    that's corrective of the auditing, and the other one is
    advancing of the case.
     
    They're two separate categories. You can't correct the
    auditing without advancing the case, but they are two
    separate categories. So all case supervisor actions come
    under the heading of corrective of the auditing, or
    advancing the case.
     
    Now picking up and running out a psychoanalysis of 1895 is
    not corrective of the case. 'Cause there, it's the case. So
    that an assessment of resistive cases has a couple of items
    on it, which is audited over out Ruds or grades, and
    continuous overts on Dianetics and Scientology are the
    primary ones, that are corrective. You have to correct the
    case now. Somebody's goofed the floof. If the case got here
    this far, boy, and it's still reading on those two things,
    I wouldn't give you much for the auditing it had. Reading
    on one or the other of those continuous overts on
    Scientology and nobody picked that up? Audited over out
    Ruds or grades and nobody picked that up? Ah! So, you've
    got a corrective action of the auditing, or you've got
    remaining, or almost all of them, just advancing the case.
     
    Now a case supervisor can advance cases by grades, or he
    can take an action to get charge off so the grade or action
    can be undertaken. That sounds funny. But it isn't funny
    and there's nothing very complex about it. And the case,
    somehow or another, has gotten to OT 2, and doesn't find
    any on 3. This simply means the case is too charged to be
    where it is at the time it is. Now the case wasn't brought
    up right. That's for sure. So, you might write up something
    on the order of, "Check the lower grades to see which ones
    have been run or not run." And the order would be, they
    would appear like this in a case supervisor folder. It's,
    "Fly the Ruds to F/N", that's any rud, first F/N you get on the Ruds, "Fly the Ruds to F/N." And there's something I could tell you about that. Actually the guy could have a
    PTP and he won't F/N on an ARC break. You should, by the
    strength of your magic eye, actually make him F/N on it,
    but the truth of the matter is if he's got a PTP or a
    missed withhold, he really doesn't F/N until he gets to it.
    So if the PC F/Ns on an ARC break you are very sure that he
    hasn't got a PTP or a missed withhold. Do you understand
    the rationale about it? So if he doesn't F/N on ARC break
    don't shoot somebody for it, because it's because he's got
    a PTP or a missed withhold.
     
    If your auditor was absolutely cracker jack he could make
    him ARC on it. He could make him audit. He could just put
    his Ruds in. You know? Pffft! Ruds in.
     
    The guys' confidence is such that his Ruds couldn't be out.
    You know, this kind of thing. 'Cause a rudiment, actually,
    is something the guy thinks is in his road.
     
    So anyway, the case supervision of such a case will be to
    fly the Ruds to F/N. See he's at 2.
     
    You look back to the folder, so you don't find much in the
    way of rehabs, and you say, "Fly the Ruds to F/N, two,
    check, rehab or check lower grades." A rehab or run to be
    absolutely correct. Lower grades you can say, "Check lower
    grades." Which isn't rehab them. Maybe he's had too many
    rehabs, but you're fairly sure that there's one out. One or
    more out. You could say, "Check or run lower grades." Or, "Rehab or run lower grades." It'd be two different case supervisions.
     
    You think this guy, this guy, oh you can rehab somebody
    half to death, don't you see? So to avoid all the rehab you
    want him to check these things. Now there's several ways he
    could do it. He could actually take a list, a list and
    assess it from the lower grades, and find one that read, if
    the list would communicate to the person. But the other day
    we had a little kid, and he'd had several lower grades run
    on him, and I'll be a son of a gun, nobody'd ever taught
    him the name of the lower grades, and of course he wasn't a
    Class VI, he was only eight, and the auditor got in a hell
    of a fire fight with him, because the kid thought he'd been
    run on one process while he'd been run on another process.
    The whole difficulty is that the kid didn't know the names
    of the processes anyhow. The auditor'd just asked him the
    questions. Now the auditor, to check up the lower grades,
    asked with the process names. And so the kid didn't know
    what he'd been run on, and got into an awful confusion, and
    dropped out of session. I noticed Vixie barking at him, so
    I imagine his Ruds are out. He probably has developed an
    ethics record by this time.
     
    This, this would be a common action. You say, "Something's
    wrong." Alright, so this comes back to you again, this
    comes back to you again. There was some charge came off.
    And you want to get auditors used to just making fall; long
    fall B/D type actions, so that you can see how much charge
    is coming off. You know? On their work sheets. And it
    didn't take off too much charge, hut it took off some. The
    fellow had cognited on the fact that he had an ARC break
    while he was running a service facsimile, and he got the
    right service facsimile hut he had an ARC break at that
    time. And the auditor cleaned up the ARC break at that
    time. He got something off on the Ruds, and he got this bit
    off, do you see, on having an ARC break, then they run the
    service facsimile and that's it.
     
    (Sigh) And this is what you're gonna be faced with case
    supervising some time. The TA was at 4.5 during the whole
    beginning Ruds and it didn't F/N. Now, high TA, overrun.
    Now you have a pat process listing what can be overrun,
    it's absolutely packaged. You do the same thing with it.
    You can run it all you want to, any time. It has no limits
    of any kind whatsoever. You could even be running it up at
    9. There is no limit on it. Because if there's nothing been
    overrun, it simply F/Ns. And if something has been overrun
    it's something that's come into restimulation since the
    last time it was run, don't you see? It's not like a
    listing process. It's just a bunch of items that you're,
    you're finding something to audit. So you could do that.
     
    Certainly that TA is up. And it comes back to you again.
    And the TA is at 4.5. And there isn't anything that the
    fellow thought was overrun. Now that's a wonderful
    opportunity to do something else. Just because the PC
    couldn't confront it or think of it, is no reason it isn't
    there. Something has been overrun.
     
    Normally, in this current civilization at this particular
    time, I can tell you at once what is there.
     
    LSD. LSD-25 is the first compound. Distributed by
    psychiatry to make drug addicts out of people. To show
    them, give them an idea of how it feels to be insane.
    Become very popular.
     
    Or, it's pot, marijuana, cannabis indica is the proper
    name, or cannabis americana. The proper name of marijuana,
    whether grown in India or America. Hashish, which is simDly
    a solid substance made out of cannabis indica or cannabis
    americana. All of which looks like tumbleweed growing in
    some back lot. Very easy to come by. It's one of those.
    It's one of those. Or it is some medical preparation, or it
    is some drug which has been administered to treat the person
    for insanity, or it's a biochemical cure, or something of
    this sort. And the individual thinks that he's been released
    someplace along that line.
     
    Now you understand, you did the usual to begin with. You
    asked, What has been overrun?" But you didn't get to first
    base with this. It'll be drugs. It'll be drugs. And you'll
    rehab 'em.
     
    And the tone arm behaves and the guy runs great. Those are
    just standard remedies. First you suspected, you see, that
    some auditing action was out. That is the easiest and
    closest one to handle. You couldn't find an auditing action
    that was out. Or you couldn't find one that was grossly
    out. Or the one you found out wouldn't straighten out. So,
    it's a life action. It's a high TA, so something has been
    overrun.
     
    Now the TA is so low that the individual can hardly crawl.
    And I've tried to give you some subjective reality, not
    because you have low TAs, but I've tried to give you just
    some handling experience - And also, because it works on
    anybody. And also because you should do it before you; you
    actually should do it before you do a full rehab. It is
    your LX-1 process, which is simply an assessment of a
    prepared list, and then you get the down stat type of
    charge off the case. When he thinks he's been a down stat.
    And you run some engrams to get rid of that, run some overt
    engrams so that is won't key back in again, or won't be
    dramatized. And a lot of charge comes off the case, and
    then you can do a full rehab action. And you can get much
    more out of the full rehab action. That's just in the
    interest of getting charge of' the case.
     
    Now notice that is a life action. That's actually a case
    gain type action. It doesn't have to be expressed. But it's
    a case gain type action.
     
    Now let me show you how you could really foul it up.
    Because what I've told you is relatively simple. Now I can
    show you how you really foul it up. Got a high TA, a high
    TA, so we do an LX1 and run it, without putting, and forget
    to put in the Ruds. This would be gruesome beyond belief.
    The guy has a high TA. Well you think that's impossible
    that anybody would do anything like that? No, I assure you
    that in past years it has been almost fashionable to
    believe that the next grade would bring the TA down or up.
    That's how gross tech can go out. "Oh well TA's at 5. If we give him Power why that will bring it down." Oddly enough
    Power is actually adequate occasionally to bring it down
    because it hits some overrun in the process of running it.
    And it does come down. And that gives somebody a win. But
    this is one of those wins that has cut somebodies' throat.
    Because the next one won't come down. It'll just go up
    through the moon.
     
    No. Your TA must be floating before every major action.
    That is something that seems very new. But you must float
    the TA before every major action. The TA must always be
    floated before a major action. Well the think, get this
    little think on it. You could say, "Well Christ. If you
    float the TA before a major action why do the major
    actions" Well that's somebody that thinks his target is a
    floating needle. What he actually wants is a discharged
    case. And a floating needle floats on a release, so that if
    you comprehend the definition of release, comprehend the
    definition of erasure, comprehend the general definition of
    the bank, what it's all about, it becomes very obvious. A
    persons' reality is, goes up in direct proportion to the
    amount of charge he gets off his case.
     
    There is some charge which has more quality than other
    charge. Charge taken off on the grades has more quality.
    Oddly enough, any charge taken off over enough centuries
    would probably discharge the case also. The rule is still
    there. So, you're monitoring against this. The guy bounces
    out of engrams. A guy can't come close to it. Therefore you
    want some kind of a discharging process before you send him
    into some major action. 'Cause he's in need of an assist.
    He's bunged up like a fire drill. He can't even approach
    the grades. He can't approach these next actions. So you
    have this whole little class of processes by which you
    discharge a case.
     
    You can do various little things by which you take charge
    off a case. If you were to do a category of relatives, just
    to give you, this is the routine you see. Yes, the prepared
    list and the prepcheck. That's one of the methods of
    taking charge off a case. Do a list of all the different
    types of relatives an individual can have. There's usually
    every little girl had a favorite aunt, or something, who
    will show up as an ally suddenly and mysteriously at the
    last moment. You know, something like this. So let's do a
    list of relatives. This individualts talking about family,
    family, family, family, family, and so let's do a list of
    aunt, uncle, grandma, grandfather, father, mother, and so
    on and so forth. Now we're either gonna get an ally or
    suppressive out of this. We don't care what, see? All kinds
    of familial names. And then just for Portmanteau, you know,
    just for a grab bag and throw one in like friend.
     
    And then we assess it, just standard assessment, and we
    prepcheck it, just a standard prepcheck, and the case
    starts blowing out. Guy says, "Great sessions" He doesn't realize we're trying to set him up to run something. We can
    just barely manage to fly the guys' Ruds after a half an
    hour of sweat. Case is too charged. We are undertaking
    major actions. So either the other earlier actions that
    have been undertaken on the case were badly undertaken, and
    didn't discharge the case the way they should have, or
    the individual is piling up more charge than anybody has a
    right to. In some fashion something is going on with this case.
     
    You actually don't have to know what's going on with the
    case to the degree that you think you do. All you have to
    know is, is let's get some charge off before we do anything
    else. Let's make this guy easy to fly. If we can't fly this
    guy easily, aww, let's work on it a bit here, huh? Let's do
    this, that or the other thing to straighten up. Let's take
    some charge off. Let's find some charge. Where is it?
     
    So, you'll find yourself case supervisoring, doing this.
    Where the hell is some charge here? Of course you're up
    against the fact that most of the things you see in an
    auditing session have already been discharged.
     
    Let's go back to a green form done by Mazie Gulch of Dry
    Gulch, South Dakota, who always is dry gulching PCs, and
    we're liable to find something very interesting in here:
    overts. What type of overts does this PC have? What does
    this PC specialize in here? Oh, a bit here. Yes, he has a
    lot of ignores...  Well what do you know? He ignores
    dispatches. Ahh, good. Let's make a little list here.
    Administration, business, organizations, posts, orgs, we'll
    get some charge off this guy. Assess the thing and prepcheck
    it. He says, "God, how did they know?" So you're
    trying to find some charge so you can take it off, so that
    you can undertake it and get in Ruds easily and undertake
    major actions. That's clever case supervision. That's not
    clever correction. That is case advancement. You're not
    correcting the case to that degree. You're trying to
    advance the case. We're trying to set this case up to run
    the next grade. He'll get some real advance on the next
    grade. But we don't let him fumble into the next grade. We
    wouldn't let somebody go into the Clearing Course who
    wasn't in pretty good shape on R6EW.
     
    Along with that we have a program where actually you fly
    the Ruds before you permit somebody to audit solo. He's got
    to come in and have his Ruds flown. And he's studied the
    material, got it all taped what he's supposed to do. He's
    got to come in, and get his Ruds flown before he's
    permitted to solo audit. And then he's got to turn in the
    first session to the C/S and get a C/S on it, and get his
    next C/S before he can do his next session. And then very
    few people will be getting into trouble. It would only be
    the dishonest bloke who does seven sessions without a C/S
    that wraps himself around a telegraph pole.
     
    But you get what the think is? So, on the one hand we're
    trying to advance the case by taking off charge, and we're
    doing it in an auditing session whereby we're permitting
    the individual to confront and handle his bank, because of
    the assistance of the auditor. And we can take off major
    charge in an auditing action so as to set up a case so he
    can handle it in solo. If a guy can't handle his case in
    solo he had better have an auditor. Do you follow? These
    are the different attitudes of auditing. There is on the
    one hand, the planning of it, the putting together of it,
    and so forth, ana then there's the application of it. These
    are two separate zones and areas. But a guy who can't apply
    it well is not likely to be able to order it well. And
    these are the two separate zones and areas that Class VIII
    has to be expert in.
     
    Thank you very much.
     
    **************************************************
     
     
    
     

    Track this thread for me

    Subscribe to alt.religion.scientology
    Mail this message to a friend
    View original Usenet format
    Post Reply

    << Previous in search   ·   Next in search >>

    Search Discussions
      For a more detailed search go to Power Search
    Search only in: People >> Humanities >> Theology
    All Deja.com
    Search for:
    Search  messages

     Arts & Entertainment   Automotive   Computing & Tech   Health   Money 
     News   People   Recreation   Sports   Travel 
    SHOPPING - Yellow Pages - Long Distance Deals - Free Stuff - Trade with Datek - Go to Gigabuys! - GET IT NOW @ NECX - FREE downloads! - Get FREE Health Info@drkoop.com - Apartments.com - eBay Auctions

    Copyright © 1999 Deja.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Trademarks · Terms & Conditions of Use · Site Privacy Statement.

    Advertise with Us!  |  About Deja.com