US OFFICE OF LRH
21 May 1974
ED #3 CONTL OF LRH US
TO: | ALL COS PAC
ALL CREW PAC
ALL SO PARENTS PAC
D/G PAC
D/G US
CONTROLLER COM US |
FROM: | LRH COMM US |
SUBJECT: | CADET ORG |
The following despatch traffic between LRH and LRH Comm US is released
with the intention of communication to all concerned, LRH's intention and
policies regarding the handling of Sea Org children in the PAC area.The
traffic occurred during an investigation of the children scene in PAC
ordered by the Commodore and done by LRH Comm US. The evaluation resulted
in the establishment of the Cadet Org. However, as there have recently
been upsets and ARCxs concerning the Cadet Org and its authorities and
responsibilities, it is hoped that this communication will result in
increased ARC and thus understanding which will further the Commodore's
goals and purposes regarding the handling of the SO children in PAC. The
despatches below have been communicated to the PAC COs, and they have
entusiastically agreed to support these policies and work to achieve the
ideal scene specified through their own efforts in their individual Orgs
as well as through the combined efforts of the PAC COs Conference.
Also attached for your information are the CED programs and projects done
by LRH Comm Cadet Org, Karen Spencer, and approved by Flag upon which the
Cadet Org is presently operating.
"A bright idea I had was a CO Cadets and division into age groups with
group leaders of each group, and a Sea Org school part time. The little
shavers on Flag did wonderfully with stable nannies and tutors and really
only whon they had a SO school as a special part of the action that ran on
FOs. They loved it and could then be persuaded over to the three RDs. They
all have made a AB and were pleased with themselves and felt superior.
Even little four year olds. Their school room was all over decorated with
SO and AB types of items. When that was dropped they felt out of it,
gangsterism and crime came in because they were without purpose. The above
bright idea is very recent, looking back over times when children have no
real problem. Also people forget that exact HCO PL Ethics has to kept in
especially on children. They have to be hatted. And that many need their
own child MAAs, again hatted. Twice, true Suppressives, though only 5 in
one case and about 6 in another absolutely ruined not only the other kids
but also every effort to put it to rights and one Org also! By sheer
psychotic covert violence.
I get my wins with children by treating them like people. And thoses kids
there are a big asset actually. But they can be made into a big libility
unless the scene is handled.
Anyway, I'd give them a full Org Board for the nursery and age groups and
divisions. And you'd see some order come in to it and some reals assets
come out of it.
We have the full admin tech to handle any kind of a group. So why should
they be miserable and knocked about when they can have their own Org and
be respected and demand respect from their eldersas well and feel proud
of themselves. The kid product US is turning out is pretty strange. ..;
they're so LOST. It has taken ME monthsof not working on it to have kids
smile at me and be glad to see me around here, I speak of street kids, very
casual. They HATE grownups around here. In Cork boys of 10 and 12 are now
making up 17% of the violent crimes. So there's a lot missing in the
culture these days. But then we're making a new culture so why not also
grow one?
The real trick is to get them over the cause without their
|
ED #3 CONTL OFFICE OF LRH US |
page 2 |
|
having to use naughtiness to be at covert cause. A Cadet Org could
accomplish that." LRH. Despatch to LRH Comm US 25 August 1973.
"This is as far as we have gotten: Parents have dumped their parents
hats on SO. SO has consistently dumped its Cadet hat on parents in PAC (a
fact I just recently added up) by using them as a via. The result has been
ruddy old mess of no resposibility on either side - a between two chairs
scene. I was glad to sort this much of it out as I have been absolutely
flabbergasted whe orders to Pac about children when routinely unexecuted.
Naturally! They were being dumped on a no terminal, a via I never for an
instant expected anyone would be dumb enough to use. Yet I suppose I could
have guessed it as it parallels the American family pattern of have poppa
hit because Johnny broke a window because all Johnny's up to 45 (I think
that is now the age of majority parents have for their sons) are
irresponsible dears that ought to be euthanasied. Now with THIS much seen
through maybe one could complete an evaluation looking for other points and
maybe actually fix responsibility for the children on proper SO terminals
and get something done that is effective, based on what has been effective
in the past. And we'd have some fine kids, who also love their parents.
It's a cloudy scene of kids in public schools but really maybe not, of
older kids teaching younger ones how to be tough. An effort to put it on a
family organization type is going to fail, I guarantee you that."
LRH. Despatch to LRH Comm US 27 August 1973.
"Hey Toby! I just found out why I couldn't really get the child scene
up on Flag and why they got offloaded.
EVERY ORDER I PASSED DOWN CONCERNING THEM WAS PROMPTLY CROSS ORDERED AT A
LOWER ECHELON BY REFFERING THE ORDER TO THE PARENT!!!!!!!
I never before had this datum. ...
This is what cost the kids FLAG. I found this in interrogating someone who
had been on the lines - it never came up before it was thought to be
really correct. YOW WOW! Correct, hell. It's a total offload of SO
responsibility. As well as a Comm Ev offense to cross order. So this is
why nothing could be handled. AND I AM CERTAIN THAT IS THE PAC WHY. It is
acultural aberration.
Give me the scene, give me the scene, give me scene! I've had loses on this
area and I got the why. I knowed there was catamounts in them mountings!
The only way this can backfire now is counter propaganda like 'They are
costing us our chillun' or some such nonsense. When we are trying to give
them a top grade A spunky be-proud-of em offspring!" LRH. Despatch to
LRH Comm US 28 August 1973.
"This despatch on children and the message about them may run a bit
counter to cultural or group ideas. But they have to get educated and I
see no sign of any organization to do it and it would be months or a year
anyway. There seems to be a fear of officials. That's understandable. But
that fear could lead to pulling them in. Only offensive actions handle
Officials. We must force officials to cooperate and work to handle and
such scene. This makes them feel responsible and important. They don't want
a 'Officials refuse to cooperate in educating children.' This will be hard
at first. Also hard on the kids. But the way to handle it is special
coaching after school and very solid hatting in a Cadet Org USING STUDY
TECH. That makes a lot of little geniuses out of them. Also somebody is
going to propose a uniform BUT CHILDREN MUST NOT WEAR ONE TO SCHOOL as
they'd catch it.
Enforce the mission ordered in the message and SEE THAT IT TAKES OFF
INSTANTER AND THAT PERENTAL Q and A is STEAMROLLED. This kids can be
adjusted to grade easily enough. But at least a scrap of tutorig unit using
study tech well be vital almost at once. So see that that get into the
scene also. There's a lovely little book on study tech in a basic form.
The CO has it. Copies should
|
ED #3 CONTL OFFICE OF LRH US |
page 3 |
|
be available to every child and a unit in the Cadet Org would pound it home
even if the org isn't there yet. IF YOU WROTE A PGM ON THIS ORDER AND
COUNTED ITS STATS IT WOULD BRING IN THE SUNDAES. The program is of course
'Get the Study Tech on the Children.' " LRH. Despatch to LRH Comm US
15 September 1973.
"However, I have found the why of this scene. Parents bringing
children into the SO dump their parents hats on the SO and the SO instead
of taking responsibility dump the hat back on the parents resulting in a
totally cross ordered and scrambled scene that no stable organization can
be gotten into. I found for instance that everyorder I issued about
children at Flag was at once referred to a parent and not one personnel to
whom such an order was issued ever carried it out. This cost children Flag.
It is making the trouble in Pac.
As soon as you have that why some sense can be made out of the scene and
it can be advanced toward and Ideal. But no ideal was ever stated. This
would be competent and well trained children who are a credit to the SO and
are resources.
The tech on this is in the PL about depowering people by knocking their
hats off. PTS research is beginning to reveal that the parents actions in
knocking off the child's hat is a basic of PTS. The weakening results in
valence shifts. The answer of course is in hatting PLs. An unhatted child
is going to be a juvenile delinquent and an unproductive child is going to
be miserable. Pride and sense of value are interlocked in this.
It also happens that the American way of life runs very counter to child
hadling and is basis of the American trouble with this part of its culture
which will of course eventually destroy the culture as it is built on
children.
Thus we will have to ruddy mess if this scene is not properly handled and
evaluated.
In the finance sphere this is quite a handful. The only way we can afford
to handle this scene at all is to let the state share some of the burden.
It is not practical at this time to try to run a self-supportive school.
Under heading of resources, then, any grandious scheme would fail. The why
of finances is that we are doing the only effective work in the field yet
psychiatrists and psychologists who have no result are dragging in all the
billions. We must therefore reserve our resources in order to apply them
to shorter term expansion, defense, and, of course, taking over eventually
the field and its appropriations. Reversely those children will have a
role to play in this and are resources. The Industrial age looks on a
child as a non-resource and so will anyone in the SO that is steeped in the
culture from which they came. They are sentimentally destructive and think
it is too cold blooded to look on children as a resource. The end product
is that they damage the child by knocking off his hat in a dozen ways. From
this we are getting our 'politicians' and adult shoes that, if you look at
them, are Buster Browns. By firmly holding the line on hatting we can
achieve success in the child area.
This has an awful lot to do with quarters. You do NOT want a School.
We cannot afford a million of any part of it. There is alarm at putting
the children in public schools as they are retarded in grade some day. I
think all this can be caught up easily. It is not optimum but measured by
resurce these children must go to public schools and be specially coached
to get them up to grade(in which I feel the city would help) and specially
coached while in school to make them competent.
By returning them to proper quarters directly after school, getting them
functioning, we can overcome this liability and must. Thus there must be a
whole program to get these kids into school AND FAST. The term is
beginning.
The quarters you are looking for are quarters for the CADET ORG. It will
be a 7 Div org headed by adults and below exec level manned by children
who have actual posts. Its org board must be planned out must be standard.
The cross order scene is then solved. No order to a child or about a child
must be permitted to go off lines. Parents must pass any order not to the
child but through the CO Cadets who may alter or cut it if off program.
Any discipline hoes through the Cadet Org. They must every one of them be
hatted.
|