Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=1 rDate=4/12/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 1R THE MAGIC OF THE COMMUNICATION CYCLE From the LRH Tape 6 February 1964, "Comm Cycle in Auditing"   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971R Issue I Remimeo REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1974 Auditors Supervisors (Revision in this type style) Students Tech & Qual Basic Auditing Series 1R THE MAGIC OF THE COMMUNICATION CYCLE From the LRH Tape 6 February 1964, "Comm Cycle in Auditing" If you look over communication you will find that the magic of communication is about the only thing that makes auditing work. The Thetan in this universe has begun to consider himself mest and has begun to consider himself mass and the being that considers himself mass of course responds to the laws of electronics and the laws of Newton. He is actually incapable of generating very much or as-ising very much. An individual considers himself mesty or massy and therefore he has to have a second terminal. A second terminal is required to discharge the energy. Here we have two poles. We have an auditor and a pc and as long as the auditor audits and the pc replies we get an exchange of energy from the pc's point of view. Many auditors think they are being a second terminal to the degree that they pick up the somatics and illnesses of the pc. Actually there is no backflow of any kind that hits the auditor but if he is so convinced that he is mest he will turn on somatics in echo of the pc. Actually nothing hits the auditor, it has to be mocked up or envisioned by him. You have set up in essence a two pole system and that will bring about an as-ising of mass. It isn't burning the mass, it is as-ising the mass and that's why there is nothing hitting the auditor. Now that is the essence of the situation. The magic involved in auditing is contained in the communication cycle of auditing. You see now you are handling the SMOOTH INTERCHANGE BETWEEN THESE TWO POLES. When you look over the difficulties of auditing realize that you are handling simply the difficulties of the communication cycle and when you yourself as the auditor do not permit A SMOOTH FLOW BETWEEN YOU AS A TERMINAL AND THE PC AS A TERMINAL, AND THE PC AS A TERMINAL BACK TO YOU, you get a no as-ising of mass. So you don't get TA action. Part of the trick of course is what has to be as-ised and how do you go about it, but that we call technique -- (what button has to be pressed). We find, oddly enough, if the auditor is actually capable of making the pc willing to talk to him, he wouldn't have to hit a button to get tone arm action. (He cannot make the pc get tone arm action basically because a communication cycle doesn't exist.) The person who is insisting continuously upon a new technique is neglecting the basic tool of his auditing which is the communication cycle of auditing. 63 When the communication cycle does not exist in an auditing session we get this horrible compounding of a felony of trying to get a technique to work but the technique cannot be administered because there is no communication cycle to administer it. Basic auditing is called basic auditing because it goes PRIOR to the technique. A communication cycle must exist before the technique can exist. The fundamental entrance to the case is not on a level of the technique but is on a level of the communication cycle. Communication is simply a familiarization process based on reach and withdraw. When you speak to a pc you are reaching. When you cease to speak you are withdrawing. When he hears you, he's at that moment a bit withdrawn but then he reaches toward you with the answer. You'll see him go into a withdraw while he thinks it all over. Then he reaches the reason. Now he will reach the auditor with the reason and he will say that was it. You have made an exchange from the pc to the auditor and will see it reflect on the meter because that exchange now is giving an as-ising of energy. IN THE ABSENCE OF THAT COMMUNICATION YOU DO NOT GET METER ACTION. So THE FUNDAMENTAL OF AUDITING IS THE COMMUNICATION CYCLE. That's the fundamental of auditing and that is really the great discovery of Dianetics and Scientology. It's such a simple discovery but you realize that nobody knew anything about it. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright$c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 64  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=2 Rev=1 rDate=6/12/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 2R THE TWO PARTS OF AUDITING From the the LRH Tape July 1964, "O/W Modernised and Reviewed"   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971R Auditors Issue II Supervisors REVISED 6 DECEMBER 1974 Students Tech & Qual Basic Auditing Series 2R THE TWO PARTS OF AUDITING From the the LRH Tape July 1964, "O/W Modernised and Reviewed" In order to do something for somebody you have to have a communication line to that person. Communication lines depend upon reality and communication and affinity and where an individual is too demanding the affinity tends to break down slightly. Processing goes in two stages. 1. To get into communication with that which you are trying to process. 2. Do something for him. There is many a pc who will go around raving about his auditor, whose auditor has not done anything for the pc. All that has happened is that a tremendous communication line has been established with the pc and this is so novel and so strange to the pc that he then considers that something miraculous has occurred. Something miraculous has occurred but in this particular instance the auditor has totally neglected why he formed that communication line in the first place. He formed it in the first place to do something for the pc. He very often mistakes the fact that he has formed a communication line, and the reaction on the pc for his having formed one, with having done something for the pc. There are two stages. 1. Form a communication line. 2. Do something for the pc. Those are the two distinct stages. It is something like (1) Walking up to the bus, and (2) Driving off. If you don't drive off you never go anyplace. It is a very tricky and no small thing to be able to communicate to a human being who has never been communicated to before. This is quite remarkable, and is such a remarkable feat that it appears to be an end-all of Scientology to some. But you see that's just walking up to the bus. Now you have got to go someplace. Any upset that the individual has is so poised, it is so delicately balanced, that it is difficult to maintain. It is not difficult to get well. It is very hard to remain batty. A fellow has to work at it. If your communication line is very good and very smooth and if your auditing discipline is perfect so you don't upset this communication line and if you just made a foray of no more importance than saying something like -- What are you doing that's sensible and why is it sensible? -- and kept your communication line up all the while and kept your affinity up with the pc all the while, did it with perfect discipline, you would see more aberration fall to pieces per square inch than you ever thought it could exist. Now that's what I mean when I say do something for the pc. 65 You must audit well, get perfect discipline and get your communication cycle in. Don't ARC Break the pc, let your cycles of action complete. All of that is simply an entrance. You see, the discipline of Scientology makes it possible to do this, and one of the reasons why other fields of the mind never got anyplace and could never get near anybody was because they couldn't communicate to anybody. So that discipline is important. That is the ladder that goes up to the door and if you can't get to the door you can't do anything. The perfect discipline of which we speak, the perfect communication cycle, the perfect auditor presence, perfect meter reading -- all of these things are just to get you in a state where you can dn something for somebody. So when you're real slow picking up the discipline, real slow picking up keeping in the communication cycle, when you're pokey on the subject you are still 9 miles from the ball. You're not even attending yet. What you want to be able to do is audit perfectly. By that we mean keep in a communication cycle, be able to approach the pc, be able to talk to the pc, and be able to maintain the ARC. Get the pc to give you answers to your questions. Be able to read a meter and get the reactions. All of those things have to be awfully good because it's very difficult to get a communication line in to somebody anyway. They all have to be present and they all have to be perfect. If they are all present and they are all perfect, If they are all present and they are all perfect, then we can start to process somebody. THEN we can start to process somebody. I'm giving you an entrance point here of, if all your cycles were perfect, if you were able to sit there and confront the pc and meter that pc and keep your auditing report and do all these multiple various things, and keep a pleasant smile on your face and not chop his communication, well then there is something you do with these things. It takes a process now. We used to have it all backwards. We used to try and teach people what they could do for somebody. But they could never get in communication with him to do it, so therefore you had failures in processing. The most elementary procedure would be -- "What do you think is sensible?" -- or anything of that sort. The pc says, "Well, I think horses sleep in beds That's sensible." The auditor says, "Alright. Now why is that sensible?" The pc says, "Well...ah... Hey!...That's not sensible. That's nuts!" You actually wouldn't have to do anything more than that. He's cognited. You've flattened it. It's so easy to do, but you keep looking for some magic. Well, your magic is in getting into communication with the person. The rest is very easy to do, all you have to do it remain in communication with the person while you are doing this, and realize that these huge aberrations he's got are poised with the most fantastically delicate balance on little pinheads. All you have to do is to phooph and these things crash. Now if you're not in communication with this person he doesn't cognite. He takes it as an accusative action. He tries to justify thinking that way. He tries to make himself look good to you and tries to put on a public front of some kind or another. He tries to hold up his status. Any time I see a bunch of pcs around who want to jump happily to something else because sane people run on that and crazy people run on something else, and they never have to be run on the crazy one, I right away know their auditors are not in communication with them and that auditing discipline itself has broken down because the pc is trying to justify himself and trying to uphold his own status. So he must be defending himself against the auditor. 66 The auditor couldn't possibly be in communication with him. So we are right back to the fundamental of why didn't the auditor get into comm with the pc in the first place. You get into communication with the pc in the first place by doing proper Scientology discipline. That is not any trick. It goes off, 1, 2, 3, 4. You sit down and you start the session and you start handling the pc and his problems and that sort of thing and you DO IT BY COMPLETING YOUR COMMUNICATION CYCLES AND NOT CUTTING HIS COMMUNICATION -- THE VERY THINGS YOU ARE TAUGHT IN THE TRs, and you find you are in communication with the person. Now you've got to do something for the person. Unless, having gotten into communication, you do something for the person, you lose your communication line because the R-Factor of why you're in communication with the pc breaks down. He doesn't think you're so good, and you go out of communication with him. That having happened, the person will be in a sort of status defensive and wonder why he is being processed. On the other hand, if you have done something for the pc and he has had his cognition, and you try and go on and get more TA action out of the fact that "all horses sleep in beds" -- you don't get there as you've already flattened the process. You can over-audit and you can under-audit. If you don't notice that one answer come your way, that indicates you have done something for the pc and if you keep him working on that same thing, your TA action will disappear, your pc will get resentful and you'll lose your communication line. He's already had the cognition you see. You are now restimulating the pc. You have gotten your key-out destimulation factor -- it has occurred right before your eyes. You have done something for the pc. One more mention of the subject and you've had it. There are a lot of things you could do with the pc, without doing anything for him. You can turn on some very very handsome somatics on a pc at one time or another without turning them off either. You've got to do something for the pc, not to him. Now you can be doing something (A), and the pc is doing (B), and you go on doing (A), while the pc is doing (B) then somewhere on down the line you wind up in a hell of a mess and you wonder what happened. Well the pc never did what you said so you didn't do anything for the pc. There was in actual fact no barrier to your willingness to do something for the pc but there must have been a tremendous barrier to your understanding of what was going on. That you could ask (A), while the pc answered (B), in itself showed the auditor observation was very poor so therefore the auditor wasn't in communication with the pc. So again the communication factor was out and once more we weren't doing anything for the pc. It requires of the auditor discipline to keep in his communication line. He has got to stay in communication with his pc. Those cycles have got to be perfect. He can't be distracting the pc's attention onto the TA, e.g. "I'm not getting any TA action now." That's not staying in communication with the pc -- has nothing to do with it. You're distracting the pc from his own zones and areas. Don't put the pc's attention out of session. Keep him going and keep that communication line in. And the next requirement is to do something productive for the pc using the communication line. LRH:nt.jh L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 67  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=3 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 3 THE THREE IMPORTANT COMMUNICATION LINES From the LRH Tape 15 Oct 63, "Essentials of Auditing"  Type = 12 iDate=23/5/71 Issue=3 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971 Issue III Reissued 1 December 1974 Remimeo Auditors CANCELS Supervisors BTB Of 23 MAY 1971 Students Issue III Tech & Qual SAME TITLE Basic Auditing Series 3 THE THREE IMPORTANT COMMUNICATION LINES From the LRH Tape 15 Oct 63, "Essentials of Auditing" When you are sitting in an auditing session what are the 3 important communication lines and what is their order of importance? 1. The first is the Pc's line to his bank. The Itsa Maker line. 2. The second is the Pc's line to the Auditor. The Itsa line. 3. The third is the Auditor's line to the Pc. The What's-it line. Now the definition, "Willing to talk to the Auditor", is very easy to interpret as "Talking to the Auditor". So the Auditor cuts the line the Pc has to the bank in order to get the Pc to talk, because "It's the Itsa line that blows the charge," he says. So the Auditor cuts the Pc's communication line with his bank in order to bring about an Itsa line -- and then he wonders why he gets no TA action and why the Pc ARC Breaks. This cut communication line is not perceivable to the naked eye. It's hidden because it's from the Pc -- a Thetan unseen by the Auditor -- to the Pc's bank -- unseen by the Auditor. The Auditor is simply there to use the What's-it line in order to get the Pc to confront his bank. The charge blows off it to the degree that it's confronted and this is represented by the Itsa line. The Itsa line is a report on what has been as-ised, that gives it its flow. The sequence of use of these lines in an auditing cycle is 3, 1, and then 2. Where the Auditor neglects this hidden line from the Pc to the Pc's bank, where he doesn't understand that hidden line and can't integrate it or do anything with it he is going to fail. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.ts.rd Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 68  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=4 Rev=1 rDate=4/12/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 4R COMMUNICATION CYCLES WITHIN THE AUDITING CYCLE   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971R Auditors Issue IV Supervisors REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1974 Students Tech & Qual Basic Auditing Series 4R COMMUNICATION CYCLES WITHIN THE AUDITING CYCLE (Taken from the LRH Tape, "Comm Cycles in Auditing", 25 July 1963) The difficulty that an Auditor gets into is normally found in his own auditing cycle. There are basically two communication cycles between the Auditor and the Pc that make up the auditing cycle. They are cause, distance, effect with the Auditor at cause and the Pc at effect, and cause, distance, effect with the Pc at cause and the Auditor at effect. Cause ------- Distance ------> Effect Auditor Pc Effect <------ Distance ------- Cause These are completely distinct one from the other. The only thing that connects them and makes an auditing cycle, is the fact that the Auditor, on his communication cycle, has calculatingly restimulated something in the Pc which is then discharged by the Pc's communication cycle. What the Auditor has said has caused a restimulation and then the Pc needs to answer the question to get rid of the restimulation. If the Pc does not answer the question he doesn't get rid of the restimulation. That is the game that is being played in an auditing cycle and that is the entirety of the game. (Some auditing breaks down because the Auditor is unwilling to restimulate the Pc.) There is a little extra communication cycle on here. The Auditor says, "Thank you" and you have this as the acknowledgement cycle. C ----------- Command ----------> E Auditor E <----------- Answer ----------- C Pc C ------- Acknowledgement ------> E Now there are some little inner cycles that can throw you off and make you think that there are some other things to the auditing cycle. There is another little shadow cycle: it is the observation of "Has the Pc received the auditing command?" This is such a tiny "cause" that nearly all Auditors who are having any trouble finding out what's going on with the Pc are missing this one. "Does he receive it?" Actually there is another cause in here and you're missing that one when you're not perceiving the Pc. 69 You can tell by looking at the Pc that he didn't hear or understand what you'd said or that he was doing something peculiar with the command he was receiving. Whatever that message is in response, it rides on this line. Did Pc receive, e <------ understand and -------- c answer command? Auditor C ----------- Command ----------> E Pc E <----------- Answer ----------- C C ------- Acknowledgement ------> E An Auditor who isn't watching a Pc at all never notices a Pc who isn't receiving or understanding the auditing command. Then all of a sudden somewhere along the line there is an ARC Break and then we do assessments and we patch up the session and all kinds of things go wrong. Well, they actually needn't ever have gone wrong in the first place if this line had been in. What is the Pc doing completely aside from answering? Well, what he is doing is this other little sub-cause, distance, effect line. Another of these tiny lines is the cause, distance, effect line of -- "Is the Pc ready to receive an auditing command?" This is the Pc causing and it rides up the line across distance, is received at the Auditor and the Auditor perceives that the Pc is doing something else. It is an important one and you find that Auditors goof that one very often; the Pc's attention is still on a prior action. Now here's another one -- "Has the Pc received the acknowledgement?" Sometimes you violate this one. You have been acknowledging but you've never seen that he didn't receive the acknowledgement. That perception has another little tiny one in it that actually comes on this line; it is -- "Has the Pc answered everything?" The Auditor is watching the Pc and the Auditor sees that the Pc has not said all that the Pc is going to say. You sometimes get into trouble with Pcs that way. Everything at "cause" hasn't moved on down the line to effect and you haven't perceived all of the "effect" and you go into the acknowledgement one before this line has completed itself. That's chopping the Pc's communication. You didn't let the communication cycle flow to its complete end. The acknowledgement takes place and of course it can't go through as it's an inflowing line and it jams right there on the Pc's incomplete outflowing answer line. Is the Pc ready e <-------- for the command? ------- c Did Pc receive, e <-------- understand and --------- c answer the command? Auditor C ------------ Command ------------> E Pc E <------------ Answer ------------- C C -------- Acknowledgement --------> E Did Pc complete the e <------ answer and receive ------- c acknowledgement? 70 So if you want to break it all down, there are six communication cycles which make up one auditing cycle. Six, not more than six unless you start running into trouble. If you violate one of these six communication lines you of course are going to get into trouble which causes a mish-mash of one kind or another. There is another communication cycle inside the auditing cycle and that is at the point of the Pc. It's a little additional one and it's between the Pc and himself. This is him talking to him. You're listening to the inside of his skull when you're examining it. It actually can be multiple as it depends upon the complications of the mind. This happens to be the least important of all the actions except when it isn't being done. And of course it's the hardest to detect when it isn't being done. Pc says: "Yes." Now what has the Pc said yes to? And sometimes you are insufficiently curious. And that in essence is this internal perception of line. It includes this cause, distance, effect backflash here -- "Is the Pc answering the command I gave him??" So with this, there are seven communication cycles involved in an auditing cycle. It is a multiple cycle. A communication cycle consists of just cause, distance, effect with intention, attention, duplication and understanding. How many of these are there in one auditing cycle? You'd have to answer that with how many principal ones there are because some auditing cycles contain a few more. If a Pc indicates that he didn't get the command (cause, distance, effect), the Auditor would give a repeat of it (cause, distance, effect) and that would add 2 more communication cycles to the auditing cycle, so you've got 9 -- because there was a flub. So anything unusual that happens in a session adds to the number of communication cycles in the auditing cycle, but they are still all part of the auditing cycle. Repetitive commands as an auditing cycle, is doing the same cycle over and over again. Now there is a completely different cycle inside the same pattern. The Pc is going to originate and it's got nothing to do with the auditing cycle. The only thing they have in common is that they both use communication cycles. But this is brand new. The Pc says something that is not germane to what the Auditor is saying or doing and you actually have to be alert for this happening at any time and the way to prepare for it is just to realize that it can happen at any time and just go into the drill that handles it. Don't get it confused with the drill that you have as an auditing cycle. Consider it its own drill. You shift gears into this drill when the pc does something unexpected. And, by the way, this handles such a thing as the Pc originates by throwing down the cans. That's still an origin. It has nothing to do with the auditing cycle. Maybe the auditing cycle went to pieces and this origination cycle came in. Well, the auditing cycle can't complete because this origin cycle is now here. That doesn't mean that this origin has precedence or dominance but it can start and take place and have to be finished off before the auditing cycle can resume. So this is an interruptive cycle and it is cause, distance, effect. The Pc causes something. The Auditor now has to originate as the Auditor has to understand what the Pc is talking about -- and then acknowledge. And to the degree that it is hard to understand, you have the cause, distance, effect of the Auditor trying to clarify this thing; and every time he asks a question, he's got a new communication cycle. You can't put a machine action at that point because the thing has to be understood. And this must be done in such a way that the Pc isn't merely repeating his same origination or the Pc will go frantic. He'll go frantic because he can't get off that line -- he's stuck in time and it really upsets him. So the Auditor has to be able to understand what the devil the Pc is talking about. And there's really no substitute for simply trying to understand it. There is a little line where the Pc indicates he is going to say something. This is a line (cause, distance, effect) that comes before the origination takes place so you don't 71 run into a jam and you don't give the auditing command. The effect at the Auditor's point is to shut up and let him. There can be another little line (cause, distance, effect, where the Auditor indicates he is listening. Then there is the origination, the Auditor's acknowledgement of it and then there is the perception of the fact that the Pc received the acknowledgement. That's your origination cycle. An Auditor should draw all these communication cycles out on a scrap of paper. Just take a look at all these things; mock up a session and all of a sudden it will become very straight how these things are and you won't have a couple of them jammed up. What's mainly wrong with your auditing cycle is that you have confused a couple of communication cycles to such a degree that you don't differentiate that they exist. That's why you sometimes chop a Pc who is trying to answer the question. You know whether the Pc has answered the question or not. How did you know? Even if it's telepathy it's cause, distance, effect. It doesn't matter how that communication took place, you know whether he's answered the command by a communication cycle. I don't care how you sense this. If you are nervy on the subject of handling the basic tool of auditing and if that's giving you trouble (and if you get into trouble by suddenly breaking it down and analyzing it) then it should be broken down and analyzed at a time when you're auditing something nice and simple. I've given you a general pattern for an auditing cycle; maybe in working it over you can find a couple of extra communication cycles in the thing. But they are all there and if you made someone go through each one painstakingly, you would find out where his auditing cycle is jammed up. It isn't necessarily jammed up on his ability to say "Thank you". It may very well be jammed up in another quarter. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 72  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=5 Rev=1 rDate=29/11/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 5R THE COMMUNICATION CYCLE IN AUDITING From the LRH tape 6 Feb 64, "Comm Cycle in Auditing"   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Tech & Qual Students  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971R Remimeo Issue V Auditors REVISED 29 NOVEMBER 1974 Supervisors (Revision in this type style) Tech & Qual Students Basic Auditing Series 5R THE COMMUNICATION CYCLE IN AUDITING From the LRH tape 6 Feb 64, "Comm Cycle in Auditing" The ease with which you can handle a communication cycle depends on your ability to observe what the pc is doing. We have to add to the simplicity of the communication cycle OBNOSIS (observation of the obvious). Your inspection of what you are doing should have ended with your training. Thereafter it should be taken up exclusively with the observation of what the pc is doing or is not doing. Your handling of a communication cycle ought to be so instinctive and so good that you're never worried about what you do now. The time for you to get all this fixed up is in training. If you know your communication cycle is good you haven't any longer got to be upset about whether you're doing it right or not. You know yours is good, so you don't worry about it any more. In actual auditing, the communication cycle that you watch is the pc's. Your business is the communication cycle and responses of the pc. This is what makes the auditor who can crack any case and when absent you have an auditor who couldn't crack an egg if he stepped on it. This is the difference, it's whether or not this auditor can observe the communication cycle of the pc and repair its various lapses. It's so simple. It simply consists of asking a question that the pc can answer, and then observing that the pc answers it, and when the pc has answered it, observing that the pc has completed the answer to it and is through answering it. Then give him the acknowledgement. Then give him something else to do. You can ask the same question or you can ask another question. Asking the pc a question he can answer involves clearing the auditing command. You also ask it of the pc so that the pc can hear it and knows what he's being asked. When the pc answers the question be bright enough to know that the pc is answering that question and not some other question. You have to develop a sensitivity -- when did the pc finish answering what you've asked. You can tell when the pc has finished. It's a piece of knowingness. He looks like he's finished and he feels like he's finished. It's part sense; it's part his vocal intonation; but it's an instinct that you develop. You know he's finished. 73 Then knowing he's finished answering you tell him he's finished with an acknowledgement, OK, Good, etc. It's like pointing out the by-passed charge to the pc. Like -- "You have now found and located the by-passed charge in answer to the question and you have said it." That's the magic of acknowledgement. If you don't have that sensitivity for when the pc is finished answering -- he answers, gets nothing from you, you sit there and look at him, his social machinery goes into action, he gets onto self auditing and you get no TA action. The degree of stop you put on your acknowledgement is also your good sense because you can acknowledge a pc so hard that you finish the session right there. It's all very well to do this sort of thing in training and it's forgivable, but NOT in an auditing session. Get your own communication cycle sufficiently well repaired that you don't have to worry about it after training. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd.jh Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 74  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=6 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 6 AUDITOR FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971 Issue VI Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students HCOB of 17 Oct 1962, Reissued verbatim as Tech & Qual Basic Auditing Series 6 AUDITOR FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND If a pc says something and the auditor fails to understand what the pc said or meant, the correct response is: "I did not (hear you) (understand what was said) (get that last)." To do anything else is not only bad form, it can amount to a heavy ARC Break. INVALIDATION To say "You did not speak loud enough _______" or any other use of "you" is an invalidation. The pc is also thrown out of session by having responsibility hung on him or her. The Auditor is responsible for the session. Therefore the auditor has to assume responsibility for all comm breakdowns in it. EVALUATION Far more serious than Invalidation above, is the accidental evaluation which may occur when the auditor repeats what the pc said. NEVER repeat anything a pc says after him, no matter why. Repeating not only does not show the pc you heard but makes him feel you're a circuit. The highest advance of 19th Century Psychology was a machine to drive people crazy. All it did was repeat after the person everything the person said. Children also do this to annoy. But that isn't the main reason you do not repeat what the pc said after the pc. If you say it wrong the pc is thrown into heavy protest. The pc must correct the wrongness and hangs up right there. It may take an hour to dig the pc out of it. Further, don't gesture to find out. To say, pointing, "You mean this item, then," is not only an evaluation but a nearly hypnotic command, and the pc feels he must reject very strongly. Don't tell the pc what the pc said and don't gesture to find what the pc meant. Just get the pc to say it again or get the pc to point it out again. That's the correct action. 75 DRIVING IN ANCHOR POINTS Also, do not shove things at a pc or throw things to a pc. Don't gesture toward a pc. It drives in anchor points and makes the pc reject the auditor. ROCK SLAMMER The reason a person who Rock Slams on Scientology or auditors or the like can't audit well is that they are wary of a pc and feel they must repeat after the pc, correct the pc or gesture toward the pc. But Rock Slammer or not, any new auditor may fall into these bad habits and they should be broken fast. SUMMARY A very high percentage of ARC Breaks occur because of a failure to understand the pc. Don't prove you didn't with gestures or erroneous repeats. Just audit, please. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1962, 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 76  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=7 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 7 PREMATURE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971 Issue VII Remimeo Auditors Supervisors HCOB of 7 Apr AD15, Reissued verbatim as Students Tech & Qual Basic Auditing Series 7 PREMATURE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Here's a new discovery. Imagine my making one on the Comm Formula after all these years. Do people ever explain to you long after you have understood? Do people get cross with you when they are trying to tell you something? If so, you are suffering from Premature Acknowledgement. Like body odor and bad breath, it is not conducive to social happiness. But you don't use Lifebuoy soap or Listerine to cure it, you use a proper comm formula. When you "coax" a person to talk after he has begun with a nod or a low "yes" you ack, make him forget, then make him believe you haven't got it and then make him tell you at GREAT length. He feels bad and doesn't cognite and may ARC Break. Try it out. Have somebody tell you about something and then encourage before he has completely told you all. THAT'S why pcs Itsa on and on and on and on with no gain. The auditor prematurely acknowledged. THAT'S why pcs get cross "for no reason". The auditor has prematurely and unwittingly acknowledged. THAT'S why one feels dull when talking to certain people. They prematurely acknowledge. That's why one thinks another is stupid -- that person prematurely acknowledges. The quickest way to become a social pariah (dog) is to prematurely acknowledge. One can do it in many ways. The quickest way to start the longest conversation is to prematurely acknowledge for the person believes he has not been understood and so begins to explain at greater and greater length. So this was the hidden ARC Break maker, the cognition wrecker, the stupidifier, the Itsa prolonger in sessions. And why some people believe others are stupid or don't understand. Any habit of agreeable noises and nods can be mistaken for acknowledgement, ends cycle on the speaker, causes him to forget, feel dull, believe the listener is stupid, get cross, get exhausted explaining and ARC Break. The missed withhold is inadvertent. One didn't get a chance to say what one was going to say because one was stopped by premature acknowledgement. Result, missed w/h in the speaker, with all its consequences. This can be counted on to make you feel frightened of being "agreeable with noises or gestures" for a bit and then you'll get it straight. What a piece of tech to remain incompletely explained. Fair scares one it does. And in the Comm Formula too! LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1965, 1971 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 77  Founder   Type = 11 iDate=5/2/66 Volnum=0 Issue=2 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 8 "LETTING THE PC ITSA" THE PROPERLY TRAINED AUDITOR   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 5 FEBRUARY 1966 Remimeo Auditors Issue II Supervisors Students Tech & Qual Reissued 23 May 71 verbatim as Basic Auditing Series 8 "LETTING THE PC ITSA" THE PROPERLY TRAINED AUDITOR The most painful thing I ever hope to see is an auditor "letting a pc Itsa". I have seen auditors let a pc talk and talk and talk and talk and run down and talk and run down and talk again until one wondered where if anywhere that auditor had been trained. In the first place such an auditor could not know the meaning of the word ITSA. The word means "It is a........ Now how an auditor letting a pc talk believes he is getting a pc to spot what IT is is quite beyond me. This pc has been talking all his life. He isn't well. Analysts had people talk for five years and they seldom got well. So how is it supposed to happen today that a pc, let talk enough, will get well. It won't. The auditor does not know the very basics of auditing skills. That's all. These are the TRs. An auditor who can't do his TRs can't audit. Period. Instead he says he is "letting the pc Itsa". If by this he means he is letting the pc drive all over the road and in both ditches, then this isn't auditing. In auditing an auditor guides. He gives the pc something to answer. When the pc answers the pc has said "IT IS A........" and that's Itsa. If the pc answers and the auditor acknowledges too soon the pc tends to go into an anxiety -- he has been chopped. So he talks more than he wanted. If the pc answers and the auditor does not acknowledge, then the pc talks on and on, hoping for an acknowledgement that doesn't come, "runs dry", tries again, etc. So premature or late-or-never acks result in the same thing -- the pc running on and on and on. And they call it "letting the pc Itsa". Bah! If a pc talks too much in session he either is getting cut off too fast by the auditor or hasn't got an auditor at all. It isn't 78 "Itsa". It's lousy TRs. (The one single exception is the pc who had years in analysis but even he begins to get better with proper TRs used on him.) The proper cure is to drill the auditor until the auditor realizes: 1. The auditor asks the questions. 2. The pc says what is the answer, "It's a........ 3. The auditor acks when the pc has said it to the pc's satisfaction and 4. The auditor acks when the pc has finished saying "It's a........" And that's Itsa. Scientology auditing is a precision skill, not a gag blop goo slup guck blah. 1. The auditor wants to know........ 2. The pc says it is........ 1. 2. 1.2. 1. 2. etc. TECH SAVVY Now an auditor who doesn't know his technology about the mind and his processes of course never knows what to ask. So he or she simply sits like a lump of sacking hoping the pc will say something that makes the pc feel better. A sure sign that an auditor doesn't know an engram from a cow about processes is seeing a pc "Itsa" on and on and on. In Scientology we do know what the mind is, what a being is, what goes wrong in the mind and how to correct it. We aren't psychoanalysts or psychiatrists or Harley Street witch doctors. We do know. The data about beings and life is there in Scientology to be learned. It isn't "our idea" of how things are, or "our opinion of".... Scientology is a precision subject. It has axioms. Like geometry. Two equilateral triangles aren't similar because Euclid said so. They're similar because they are. If you don't believe it, look at them. There isn't a single datum in Scientology that can't be proven as precisely as teacups are teacups and not saucepans. Now if we get a person fresh out of the study of "the mystical metaphysics of Cuffbah" he's going to have trouble. His pcs are going to "Itsa" their heads off and never get well or better or anything. Because that person doesn't know Scientology but thinks it's all imprecise opinion. The news about Scientology is that it put the study of the mind into the precise exact sciences. If one doesn't know that, one's pcs "Itsa" by the hour for one doesn't know what he is handling that he is calling "a pc". By my definition, an auditor is a real auditor when his or her pcs DON'T overtalk or undertalk but answer the auditing question and happily now and then originate. So how to tell an auditor, how to determine if you have trained one at last, is DO HIS PCS ANSWER UP OR DO THEY TALK ON AND ON. 79 If I had an auditor in an HGC whose pcs yapped and yapped and ran dry and yapped while the auditor just sat there like a Chinese pilot frozen on the controls, I would do the following to that "auditor": 1. Remedy A, Book of Case Remedies. 2. Remedy B, Book of Case Remedies. 3. Disagreements with Scientology, technology and orgs and Scientology personalities all found and traced to basic and blown. 4. A grind study assignment of the Scientology Axioms until the "auditor" could DO THEM IN CLAY. 5. A memorization of the Logics, Qs (Prelogics) and Axioms of Dianetics and Scientology. 6. TRs 0 to 4 until they ran out of his or her ears. 7. Trs 5 to 9. 8. Op Pro by Dup until FLAT. 9. A hard long study of the Meter. 10. The ARC triangle and other scales. 11. The Processes of Level 0. 12. Some wins. And I'd have an auditor. I'd have one that could make a Grade Zero Release every time. And it's lack of the above that causes an "auditor" to say "I let the pc Itsa" with the pc talking on and on and on. Scientology is the breakthrough that made the indefinite subject of Philosophy into a precision tool. And pcs get well and go Release when it is applied. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.jh Copyright $c 1966, 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [The original issue said "Level 0" above the title.] 80  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=10 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 9 COMM CYCLE ADDITIVES   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971 Remimeo Issue X Auditors Supervisors Students HCO P/L of 1 July 1965 Issue II Tech & Qual Re-issued verbatim as Basic Auditing Series 9 COMM CYCLE ADDITIVES There are no additives permitted on the Auditing Comm Cycle. Example: Getting the pc to state the problem after the pc has said what the problem is. Example: Asking a pc if that is the answer. Example: Telling pc "it didn't react" on the meter. Example: Querying the answer. This is the WORST kind of auditing. Processes run best MUZZLED. By muzzled is meant using ONLY TR 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 by the text. A pc's results will go to HELL on an additive comm cycle. There are a hundred thousand tricks that could be added to the Auditing Comm Cycle. EVERY ONE of them is a GOOF. The ONLY time you ever ask for a repeat is when you couldn't hear it. Since 1950, I've known that all auditors talk too much in a session. The maximum talk is the standard model session and the TR 0 to 4 Auditing Comm Cycle ONLY. It is a serious matter to get a pc to "clarify his answer". It is in fact an Ethics matter and if done habitually is a Suppressive Act, for it will wipe out all gains. There are mannerism additives also. Example: Waiting for the pc to look at you before you give the next command. (Pcs who won't look at you are ARC Broken. You don't then twist this to mean the pc has to look at you before you give the next command.) Example: A lifted eyebrow at an answer. Example: A questioning sort of ack. The Whole Message is GOOD AUDITING OCCURS WHEN THE COMM CYCLE ALONE IS USED AND IS MUZZLED. Additives on the Auditing Comm Cycle are ANY ACTION, STATEMENT, QUESTION OR EXPRESSION GIVEN IN ADDITION TO TRs 0-4. They are Gross Auditing Errors. And should be regarded as such. Auditors who add to the Auditing Comm Cycle never make Releases. So, that's Suppressive. Don't do it! LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1965, 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 81  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=8 Rev=1 rDate=4/12/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 10R RECOGNITION OF RIGHTNESS OF THE BEING Taken from the LRH Tape "Good Indicators", 7 January 1964   Remimeo Auditors Students Tech & Qual  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971R Issue VIII REVISED 4 DECEMBER 1974 Remimeo Auditors Students Tech & Qual Basic Auditing Series 10R RECOGNITION OF RIGHTNESS OF THE BEING Taken from the LRH Tape "Good Indicators", 7 January 1964 An auditor's tendency is to look for wrongnesses. He is always trying to find something wrong with the pc. That's the nature of Scientology; we assume that there is something wrong with somebody otherwise he wouldn't be here and be dead in his head, and he would be capable of doing a great deal more than he is doing at the particular moment. An individual is basically and routinely good, capable of many actions and considerable power. In the state of a Free Thetan or Native State he is a far more powerful individual than when he's been complicated up. It's the idea of the additive data to the Thetan. Try to give somebody something he doesn't want and you are going to overthrow his power of choice. His power of choice is the only thing that he had to begin with, which give him power, capability and anything else and that power of choice has been consistently and continuously overthrown by giving him things he didn't want and taking away from him things he didn't want to get rid of back and forth. You get the individual pretty overwhelmed and he goes down in power. What happened to him actually is he solved something that didn't need solving. There was something he couldn't confront so he solved it and he fixed the solution. Any time you fix these solutions, for ever and ever you put the individual down grade. An individual becomes aberrated by additives. His experiences in this universe are usually calculated to degrade and depower him. Now all you have to do is pick up all of these criss-crosses and you return him to power. Man is an added-to being and everything that has been added to him has decreased his ability to cope. When you add something to the Being he gets worse. We are in the business of deleting wrongnesses from the individual. Even the Freudian Analyst realized that some additive had been added that should be deleted. So the idea of deleting something to bring about a recovery is not new with us. Because we are in the business of deleting wrongnesses from the individual we seldom look at rightnesses and that's what's wrong with most auditors. They are so anxious to find the wrongness -- and quite properly -- and they never really look at the rightness. If they don't look at the rightnesses that are present, then they aren't appreciating the degrees of truth that are present that can be promoted into more truth. In other words they are starting at a level of no truth present all the time so of course they never make any forward progress. 82 You must realize that there must be truth present and that this truth must be recognized and that this is hand-in-glove a part of auditing -- the recognition of the fact that truth is present. If you only look for wrongnesses and only recognize wrongnesses then you will never be able to pull anything up a gradient because you won't think you have any rightnesses to work with. It just all looks wrong to you. You have to be able to look at the wrongnesses in order to right them but we also have to be able to look at the rightnesses in order to increase them. We are only trying to find wrongnesses in order to increase rightnesses, and that's very important. If you have no rightnesses present in a session you will never be able to make any progress of any kind. Progress is built on a gradient scale of rightness by which you delete wrongnesses and they drop and fall away. Therefore, Processing is an action by which wrongnesses can be deleted from the case to the degree that rightnesses are present in the session. You cannot take a case that doesn't have any rightness present and delete a wrongness. So you have to realize that there are rightnesses present and then you increase those rightnesses. That makes it possible for you to pick up the wrongnesses and that's what auditing consists of. Auditing is a contest of maintaining rightnesses so that we can delete wrongnesses. If you keep on deleting wrongnesses, all the while maintaining and increasing the rightnesses you eventually wind up with a very right being. You are trying to get a right being, therefore if you don't continually encourage right beingness you never wind up with right being. You must learn to observe an auditing session. You want your pc to wind up in a right state -- in a more native, more capable, less overwhelmed, higher power of choice sort of state. You want him to wind up with more rightnesses. Therefore, if you audit so that you do not encourage and increase rightnesses then you won't wind up with a right pc. The degree of rightness you have present must exceed the wrongness you are going to pick up. It's a proportional action. If you've got as much wrongness in a session as you've got rightness you're not riding on any cushion. It makes a very difficult job of auditing. If you want to pick up this little wrongness, you have to have rightnesses present which are big enough to engulf it. That makes easy auditing. If the rightnesses in the session are very minor and the problem is a tiny one, there isn't enough rightness in the session to handle the problem and the pc cannot erase it. THE PC'S ABILITY TO AS-IS OR ERASE IN A SESSION IS DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO THE NUMBER OF GOOD INDICATORS PRESENT IN THE SESSION. And his inability to cope in a session rises proportionally to the number of bad indicators present in a session. Any process has its own series of bad indicators. And the bad indicator moves in when the good indicator moves out. So you have to have a primary knowledge of good indicators. Don't look for bad indicators on and on and on; you'll drive the pc around the bend and suppress the good indicators. What you want to do is know your good indicators for the level you are running so well that when one of them disappears out of the session, your ears go up and you instantly look for the bad indicator. Don't look for the bad indicator until you see the vanishment of the good indicator. Otherwise you're continually prowling around looking for wrongnesses in a session and you keep a pc very upset and you get no auditing done of any kind whatsoever. 83 Remember this next time you see a pc start to bog and drag and flounder one way or the other. You've got to get the pc's good indicators back in before you can get the pc to handle what you want him to handle. What influences the attitude of the pc is an ARC Break (that of course is influenced earlier by the auditor's behavior), or the pc has an overt on the auditor or the pc has a missed withhold. An auditor who never gets in and finds out what is wrong in the session -- the reasonable auditor -- messes up pcs like mad. If all the good indicators are present the auditor knows he is doing a good job of auditing. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH: nt.rd Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/5/71 Volnum=0 Issue=9 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Basic Auditing Series 11 METERING   Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Tech and Qual Staff Checksheets of all courses teaching metering  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971 Issue IX Remimeo Auditors Supervisors Students Basic Auditing Series 11 Tech and Qual Staff Checksheets of all courses teaching metering METERING One does NOT tell the pc anything about the meter or its reads ever, except to indicate an F/N. Steering a pc with "That-That-That" on something reading is allowable. But that isn't putting attention on the meter but on his bank. Definition of "In Session" is "Pc interested in own case and willing to talk to the auditor". Saying "That reads", "That didn't read" "That blew down" is illegal. It is no substitute for TR 2. It violates the In Session definition by putting pc's attention on the meter and can make him very unwilling to talk to the auditor! L. RON HUBBARD LRH:act.rd Founder Copyright $c 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 84  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 12 iDate=22/4/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=20/11/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 1R CRAMMING PURPOSE: TO TEACH THE STUDENT WHAT HE HAS MISSED. WHAT HE IS, WHAT HE DOES  Type = 12 iDate=22/4/71 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Qual Sec Hat Supervisor Course Checksheets Supervisor Hats  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 22 APRIL 1971R Remimeo Qual Sec Hat Supervisor Course Checksheets Supervisor Hats (Reissued 12 December 1917) Reissued 11 July 1974 as BTB Revised 20 November 1974 (Revision in this type style) CANCELS BTB OF 22 APRIL 1971 SAME TITLE Cramming Series 1R CRAMMING PURPOSE: TO TEACH THE STUDENT WHAT HE HAS MISSED. WHAT HE IS, WHAT HE DOES The Cramming Officer should be the most skilled Supervisor in the place. He should handle only causes -- as basic as he can get. Then he sets the fellow back on the road. Cramming requires individual, skilled attention by someone who is willing to 2-Way Comm and knows the subject under discussion well enough to be able to find where specific points are covered. Cramming's purpose is to teach the student what he's missed. To do that, it must handle both why he missed it and what was missed. Stable Data: 1. Things are CAUSED, they do not "just happen". 2. The cause lies earlier than the effect. 3. It is not "human to err" nor is it reasonable to forget things nor are there people who are "naturally slow". 4. Though stupidity comes in general from charge on the case, thoroughly remarkable changes can be effected in rate and thoroughness of data assimilation, independent of general auditing, by use of study technology. 5. Basic, when blown, discharges the rest of the chain; Basic is earlier. In practice, the "why" of a suddenly slowed rate of study or of an overt product can be found and gotten rid of by looking just before the change and fixing up what you find. (Sometimes one has to carry the matter earlier, especially in the case of improving a study rate that is generally slow.) RESULTS Another Stable Datum is: If it didn't resolve the situation, it wasn't the right cause of it. You don't know what was bogging the guy until you find it -- it's easy to evaluate what you think must be wrong with the guy or sell your wins or cogs... but it's very hard on the guy you're cramming. The route to 100% results on the students is persistence in finding the actual cause. 87 Hammering the same point over and over just doesn't find the cause of a repeating error (and there shouldn't even be the first error, if he did the course properly). When he's found (not you've found, when he's found) what's out, you'll have as many VGls as you could ask for and the error will not repeat. LOG BOOK Keep a log book giving the date and name of student, reason sent to Cramming. This gives a good idea of how the student is doing. PROGRAM The Cramming Officer gets into 2-Way Comm with the student to estimate what needs to be done, and lines up a short program of steps to be taken in Cramming. This is done in duplicate. The original is handed to the student. The Cramming Officer retains the duplicate for his record and so he can trace the student's progress, and bring it to a rapid completion. The students should be kept busy. GRAPH TREND Go over the student's daily graph of study stats and from the point of downward trend, check the checksheet for what was being studied at that time, or just before. CRAMMING TECH The standard of just taking the Bulletin he's hung up on and asking for a missed word in the previous Bulletin (or previous Section of the Bulletin) works great and often simply this would handle the situation. Whatever it is, it is something, and there are a finite number of things it can be. Frequently the student will offer a word and then half withdraw it -- yet usually it's the very first one he offers when asked. So when you ask for a word, take what's offered... all too often the word the guy hung up on is one he almost believes, or fully believes, he knows. BASIC TOOL Your most basic tool is the full "cycle of the misunderstood". A very large part of the time you have to use the whole thing. Say you're cramming an Auditor who's just goofed. C/S has sent him to Cramming on R3R steps, as in the middle of session he started dropping commands. Your first task is to find what exactly occurred. There can be bad admin or other varieties of false reports. Then why that occurred, looking earlier. In many cases something else preceded gross obvious goofs. He did the course, he's got no right ever to goof that data. Aha! He wasn't sure if he should have been running that item on the Pc... seemed like a narrative. Now with the initial goof to hand you find the principle that wasn't understood. On check, yep, he doesn't understand what it's OK to run or not to run in Dianetics. Aha, Aha! And what word or term? Yes, he doesn't know what "narrative" means. Clay Demo of "narrative" (full demo -- not "can somebody guess") after looking it up... a checkout on a couple of HCO Bs... and the guy's in business. Then you can assess how much restudy of what is needed and groove him in to not omit commands even when flustered. Now he can learn, and will apply. 88 OTHER TOOLS All standard study tech is at your disposal; HCO B Feb 21, 66, "Definition Processes", HC Stress Analysis, etc., will get many a student out of the soup by themselves. Frequently a student proves to be pushed too far along the gradient and simply needs to be put back, to the proper slot. Often all mass and doingness get left aside and only theory gets done -- the guy never got an E-Meter or looked at a Pc. Sometimes the guy's programmed onto the wrong course entirely -- completely without a purpose on the one he's on. WHEN SIMPLY ASKING FOR A MISSED WORD DRAWS A BLANK Sometimes he can't spot one offhand. You can simply ask for the prior area the fellow feels "weak in" or "disagrees with" or "feels unsure of" and from that easily get the missed term. Clay of terms which the guy missed and hung up on helps a lot -- whether in the present or a previous similar subject. This approach works very well when cramming in relation to a subject involving only activity, where there was no particular study of printed matter associated with it. WHEN THERE APPEARS TO BE NO EARLIER Counter-Policy and Counter-Tech come into this. Frequently the guy "knows" the data but also "knows" something else that is either directly misunderstood or the result of a misunderstood. There's no obvious earlier error, he just all the time erroneously omits the R3R step despite having been checked out... obviously if it's simply a matter of "Gee! I never saw that before," your job is easy and the Why is simply didn't do the material in the first place. But say the Exec did the course, but still won't ever train his staff. He's full of apparent comprehension, but doesn't apply. Well there's the overt -- won't train -- yet he feels he's doing right or he wouldn't be doing it. Fine, your approach is, "Why was what you did the right thing to do in those circumstances?" ("What made it OK to commit the overt?") "One's got to cope and get the product out." "Good, what's the policy covering that that you're using -- get me a copy, please." You take the policy he's using as the reason (whether an actual Policy, Bulletin, or someone's order, or even an "everybody knows" from Psychology) and find the principle not understood and the word missed that led to the misunderstanding and you're back in business. Maybe, above, it turns out the guy didn't know he should have set someone to organize behind him and finally didn't know what "product" meant at all. Repaired, the guy will now at last both cope and train. SLOW STUDENTS Often subjects studied earlier (and usually blown from) have to be addressed. E.g. One student couldn't seem to get or find his misunderstood on the Ethics Section of OEC. This was traced back to a term he'd never understood while studying law, and magically he suddenly understood the Ethics Policies he was studying. Sometimes the student has gone past 20-30 misunderstoods, and each one has to be defined. E.g. One student had never completed his HSDC because he "couldn't read DMSMH". He'd gone 1/3 way through and utterly bogged. After defining word after word he hadn't understood, with the student getting brighter and brighter, he suddenly stated -- "Hey, it's easy to read now." 89 CRAMMING AUDITORS The first thing to do is to go over the C/S, the session, the C/S comments and Cramming actions to be done. Trace back misunderstoods to basic and from that indicate which HCO B(s) to restudy on. Often the Auditor will originate another area of uncertainty. Take these up too and handle each one. OTHER STANDARD TOOLS Student Rescue Intensives sometimes are a life-saver. The Learning Drill, even Op Pro by Dup (with C/S OK), TRs 0-9 and all sorts of drills as issued (e.g. 101-104) assist. TR errors are as fundamental errors as you can get on an Auditor -- except perhaps, can he sit in the chair? THE COURSES A large part of the Cramming Officer's responsibility lies in correcting the courses that trained the guy being crammed. If it had been run all that standardly you'd not have expected the fellow to wind up in Cramming. Sometimes the student himself isn't at fault at all -- common course outnesses which the Cramming Officer may have to see corrected before students can get anywhere are: 1. No Supervisor. 2. No materials. 3. No checksheet. 4. Improper checksheet. 5. No checkouts available. 6. All theory, or perhaps Theory with demos or clay substituted for an actual Practical section. 7. No Supervisor 2-Way Comm in use. (Nothing mystic here -- just no one talks to anyone.) 8. Evaluated tech, e.g. by Supervisor or fellow student. 9. Uneducated Supervisors, in general -- not using or applying the Study Tech themselves. 10. Bad equipment, especially tape recorders. 11. Student has never done the Student Hat, not knowing Study Tech at all himself. Doesn't know how to study and so never learns anything! The Cramming Officer, in the face of Course and Supervisor outnesses, as above, must firstly unbug the student and get him winning again, then call in the Supervisor or Supervisors involved and get them corrected. In the case of a Course Admin who can't maintain the tape recorders, he is pulled in and fully corrected in this area. SUPERVISION AND C/S Very often the student is having difficulty because of poor supervision. He would be learning well and progressing if the Supervisor were better trained or crammed. The same situation could exist with the C/S -- he may need training and cramming. This should not be overlooked by a Cramming Officer who sees too many students or Auditors being sent for the same difficulties. 90 It is the Cramming Officer's responsibility to keep Supervisors and C/Ses trained as well. THE STUDENT HAT The Cramming Officer may find that the student has never learned how to be a student. He was never hatted -- never got an R-Factor on what was expected of him as a student. It is simple to get him hatted with the Student Hat. This does not apply only to students in Tech Training and Technical Personnel but to Admin Students as well. Staff Personnel on Admin Courses, Staff Status, OEC, Hats, are also students and require Hatting and Cramming. They should not be neglected by the Cramming Officer. COACHING TO A NO WIN Occasionally you will find a coach who can't give himself or another a win. He coaches toward a loss. This could go so far as to not let himself progress just to keep his fellow student back. Or he may never let his fellow student pass -- or pass him when he doesn't deserve it. This could require auditing to resolve. But a good Cramming Officer can handle this by finding the Why and getting it handled. And find the area he has losses on and get the misunderstoods off. INVALIDATION AND CORRECTING THE WRONG WHY One barrier to study is the conviction that a right datum is wrong or not to be applied. The only resolution to this is finding and pulling off whatever or however it got invalidated and then rapid restudy of the area. A student ordered to "restudy his Finance Pack because 'he doesn't know his finance policy'" will profit from the study best after the Why is located specifically and straightened up. Once he's found, say, his misunderstood in "how to do payroll" he can then study the rest of the pack in staff study with profit and certainty. A restudy without finding what's out tends to leave him in doubt about all his comprehension of the materials and he ends up more uncertain of the materials than before, unless he happens to spot the exact error in the course of the general review. THERE IS A CAUSE Persistence is probably the keynote. Since, (a) HE CAN DO IT, and (b) sometimes the first thing you find and well handle does not resolve the situation, then (c) THERE WAS SOMETHING ELSE AWRY TOO. You follow each cycle to a VGI/Cog. A VGI/Cog doesn't necessarily resolve the whole show, but it ends an action. Sometimes you get a good change as "My God, you know I've never really known what an F/N was" or "You know, I've always avoided Finance Policy and don't really understand it at all." That does end that action. But then you still have to find the misunderstoods in the Policy, and drill, checkout, etc. BASICS The most common misunderstoods of Tech Students and Students on Admin Courses alike lie in the Basic's -- METERING, TRs, UNDERSTANDING OF THE AUDITOR'S CODE, THE BASIC THEORY OF THE HUMAN MIND, STRICT HONESTY AND HONOR AS AN AUDITOR. These are the things the student should learn early and what a good Cramming Officer always looks for, because if the student did not learn them early in his training -- or if he had had an earlier than Scientology Misunderstood -- his later training will hang up somewhere. 91 The Cramming Officer should check for things like: What is the Mind? What is Charge? What is the Time Track? What happens when something keys in? What happens when something keys out -- or erases? What is it that makes the meter read? What is mass? Questions like this should be asked and good Demos done. Then the Cramming Officer can go earlier and earlier. He may find the misunderstood in earlier subjects -- algebra, science, philosophy, simple multiplication, it could be anywhere; and the Cramming Officer tracks it down. TRs, METERING, AUDITOR'S CODE, THE AUDITOR'S INTEGRITY ARE DRILLED SO THAT THEY APPLY TO THE SESSIONS THE AUDITOR RUNS. The student or Auditor will cognite that these are for use and not just for drilling. The Cramming Officer is there to unbug the Auditor and student -- wherever the bug or flaw may be. It must be tracked down to basic and cleared up. Every Org must have a good Cramming Officer. Without a Cramming Officer, auditing and training are not kept at the high quality our Tech requires. A good Cramming Officer is one of the Org's most valuable personnel. Compiled and written from Flag Cramming and Qual Sec actions by Training and Services Aide Revised by Ensign Judy Ziff, CS-5 Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:BofI:AL:MH:JZ:JR:GE:JF:LM:mh.rd Copyright$c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 92  Compiled and written from Flag Cramming and Qual Sec actions by Training and Services Aide Revised by Ensign Judy Ziff, CS-5 Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 2RB CRAMMING ACTIONS  Type = 12 iDate=21/1/72 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=10/6/73 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=10/6/73 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN Remimeo 8 MARCH 1975 Issue I Revises, Combines & Cancels BTB 21 Jan 72RA, Cramming Series 2RA, BTB 10 June 73RA, Cramming Series 19RA, BTB 10 June 73, Issue III, Reissued 19 Jul 74, Cramming Series 20. Cramming Series 2RB CRAMMING ACTIONS The particular areas of expertise a Cramming Officer has to have, in addition to being a proven Auditor and Supervisor to the level of the Org are: 1. TRs 0-9 & Rapid TR-2 2. Metering 3. Axioms & Codes 4. Coaching 5. Mechanics of the Mind 6. Problems of Work 7. Word Clearing -- M2, 3, 4, 6, 7 & 9 8. The Tech Materials to the level of the Org 9. 10 points of Keeping Scientology Working. THE CRAMMING OFFICER'S PROCEDURE The general procedure in use in handling Auditors sent to Cramming is as follows: A. Interview the Auditor with the folder and Cramming Order. B. Go over the folder locating all errors in sequence, earliest to latest. C. Find the Why for the goof on a meter. D. Ensure the Cramming Order handles the Why, is short and written in sequence of gradient handling, including basics. E. See that the misunderstoods are cleaned up back to the BASICS (e.g. errors handling out Ruds traced back through Basic Auditing Series to the Auditor's Code). Always use WC 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 9 in addition to starrates and clay. F. Have the Auditor drill the procedure flubbed until flawless. G. Have the Auditor do TRs 0-4 (6-9 if necessary), debugging individual TRs on a gradient of perfection. H. If a chronic error, metering error or low hours, check over his meter position, eyes and his handling of the meter, and OT TR 0 and TR 0 particularly. I. Now, with the error corrected and basics in, interview the Auditor and verify that the Why is handled and send to the Pc Examiner as a VGIs F/Ning student. J. If no F/N, check him over on the meter for by-passed why or misunderstoods, isolate the area and get it corrected and Word Cleared M2 & 9 and starrated and drilled. K. Write up the "Why" and key actions of the handling for the C/S, attach the F/N Exam form and route to the C/S logged as complete. 93 Steps A & B have several parts: a. Show me. b. Tell me. c. Obnosis. d. What happened just before that? SHOW ME In many instances, if a person is asked what was done, he will not report exactly what was done, so a Cramming Off should get a person to SHOW him what he did. A Cramming Off has to hand a Cramming Order. His first action is to get the person to demonstrate by going through the motions. In many cases, he won't have to go any further because the demonstration will immediately show what was wrong and requiring correction. For example, an Interne is having trouble with assessment, but a simple demonstration shows that he does not know how to set up for a session. He has his Meter way over to the left, the worksheets in the center and the assessment sheet way over to his right, and thus cannot see the list, the Meter and the Pc all in one field of vision. Such a demo can take one minute and save a Cramming Off 20 minutes of digging. In Admin Cramming, Show Me can take the Cramming Off into the Staff Member's area. TELL ME When Show Me is not possible, have the person tell what happened. "Exactly what did you do?" is a stable datum. Get the exact sequence of events not a lot of ramble. If very confused have the person use a Demo Kit. Don't get caught up in reasons or explanations. OBNOSIS The Cramming Officer must be able to pick out the outnesses in what is being said or shown. One doesn't have to be an expert to recognize and follow down something that doesn't make sense. WHAT HAPPENED JUST BEFORE THAT? In some cases, particularly in the Tech Cramming area, the Cramming Off will have to find out what happened just before the goof. When checking for what happened just before a goof, the Cramming Off will find A. something he didn't understand, and/or B. something he couldn't control. A new Interne flubs the commands of R3R. Now, if the Cramming Off doesn't ask what happened just before that, he may miss out on his Why. He will probably find out that the interne realized he was running out of paper, or some such common incidence, which caused him to become flustered, TRs to go out, and he flubbed the commands. In this case, through his own lack of planning and set-up actions, the Interne lost control of the session. So the Cramming Off will cram the Interne on session set-up actions and strengthen his TR 0 through the use of TRs booklets and tapes and see that he continues daily TRs Training on the Interneship. When a look into a situation does not readily show up a Why, go earlier and find out what happened. ETHICS The only hidden barrier to real success in Cramming is non-participation, the indicator of Out Ethics. A Cramming Off must recognize Out Ethics and get it handled. He may be able to get the Staff Member to handle it on the spot, or he may have to send the person to Ethics or even to Integrity Processing. The point is to recognize the barrier to progress and get it removed. 94 SUPERVISOR CRAMMING Unless Qual is also correcting Training where needful, Cramming will be overloaded with flubbed products who didn't get the data in the first place and are now goofing on their Tech or Admin post. The Qual Sec should inspect Course rooms daily. Does the Super have his E-Meter set up on his desk ready for an M2 or M4? Is the Super moving around the class constantly, handling students, keeping them moving and F/Ning? Actual Super two-way comm with students should be listened to and TRs and Supervisor or study tech correction written up. Does the Super have a Qual OK to do Word Clearing M2 and 4 on his students? Are there student graphs up and posted in PT? Are the Roll Books properly filled in and in PT? Are all points of "What is a Course" in? Are there any students on strange or irregular schedules? Is the Supervisor at least a Mini Course Supervisor Course grad? Are there other Supervisors training on HPCSC and postgraduate Supervisor training (HSCSC) or schedules to go for such training? Are Supervisor TRs poor or choppy? Do they do daily TRs? Are blown students immediately contacted, brought in and handled? Can the Supervisor "see" what is happening in the Classroom? Can he handle what he sees? Any Supervisor with down stats, drop-outs, blows or slow students must become bait for a continuing correction program until the standard is way up and into an acceptable level. The value of a good Academy or HSDC Supervisor, who runs snap and pop courses, gets his students through rapidly and thoroughly is extremely high. In this case, he is personally worth about two times that of a top HGC Auditor in terms of beans into the Org. HAS and HQS Course Supers prove their worth in future beans and re-sign-ups in the Org. They help to create future business in the Academy and the HGC. Therefore, proven top Supervisors should not be ignored as areas of facility differential. A Supervisor is handled in Cramming like any other person in for correction. The Situation is located, the Why found and the handling for that Why executed. There are many such Situations and Whys to be found on most to get them to a point of being flubless Supervisors. It is a no more lengthy cycle than getting an interne through his Interneship. A good Supervisor produces the Org's future Auditors. Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:CH:JK:JE:nt.jh Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 95  Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=2 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  TYPES OF CRAMMING ADMIN CRAMMING  Type = 11 iDate=12/2/71 Issue=2 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=12/6/73 Issue=3 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=7/6/73 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 8 MARCH 1975 Issue II Remimeo Revises, Combines & Cancels HCO B 12 Feb 71, Issue II, Reissued 12 Dec 71, Cramming Series 3, BTB 12 June 73R, Issue III, Cramming Series 15R, BTB 7 June 73RA, Cramming Series 16RA Cramming Series 3R TYPES OF CRAMMING ADMIN CRAMMING (Ref: HCO PL 30 Aug 74, "Qual Stat Change".) There are two areas of Cramming: 1. Tech Cramming. 2. Admin Cramming. There are two basic types of Cramming: A. To rapidly prepare a person for post or technical action, through intensive study, Word Clearing and drilling on key materials. B. To rapidly correct a person after the fact of an error or flub, by finding the Why, and handling that Why with study and Word Clearing of the particular data involved and drilling the actions to a point of confidence and competence. This covers Cramming Orders sent to Qual or originated by the Cramming Off or Qual Sec on Outpoints in the Org. The administrative and executive staff of an Org require Cramming as much as technical personnel. The handlings are analogous. The cycle goes like this: 1. Hat checksheet completed in staff training. 2. Cramming ordered when a staff member flubs. 3. Cramming to find and handle the basic reason for the continued flubs, if present. 4. Ethics, if proven necessary, to no change or improvement or refusal to be corrected, overtly or covertly. Post duties break down into various skills just as they do for Auditors or C/Ses or Course Supervisors. Sources for Admin staff correction break down into: A. Basics of Scientology as applied in life -- ARC, cycles of action, eight Dynamics, etc. B. Staff Member Basics -- Staff Status 0, 1, 2, OEC Volume 0, Org Bd. 96 C. Post Hat -- Mini Hat, Full Hat. D. OEC Volumes by Division. All Policy. The Admin Cramming Off has a vested interest in seeing that Staff Training exists and produces hatted staff members who can do their post duties competently. Where staff training is lacking, he must work with the Qual Sec and STO to get it into operation. The steps of handling an Admin Cramming cycle are: 1. Find out what happened or is happening. 2. Establish the situation (biggest departure from what should have happened or should be happening). 3. Find the why for that situation on a meter. 4. Write up the handling to eradicate the why and get a return towards the Ideal Scene by Cramming on the key issues for the area and removing any blocks to their implementation. ORG OUTPOINTS In doing Org outpoint corrections per HCO PL 30 Aug 74, "Qual Stat Change", look at the GDSes first. Take up any and all GDSes with down stats or trend, and cram all personnel directly involved with making the GDS on visible outpoints until the stat starts going up. That means keep on correcting outpoints, by pushing in Policy and Tech until you get a stat recovery occurring. Then take up the Dept stats and get them going up. Then take up the Section stats and get them going up. Checking on stats before doing Org outpoint correct actions narrows the target to the areas needing correction. There are sometimes more areas which can cause trouble than a Cramming Officer may realize. These separate out into: 1. Staff member's actions, flubs and misunderstoods. 2. Senior's actions and reports. (Supplementary Situation per Data Series 27, HCO PL 25 May 73, "Supplementary Evaluations".) 3. Other staff influences. (Supplementary Situation per Data Series 27, HCO PL 25 May 73, "Supplementary Evaluations".) 4. Out Basics in Scn, staff or post hat duties. 5. Out Personal Ethics. 6. Environmental influence. (Supplementary Situation per Data Series 27, HCO PL 25 May 73, "Supplementary Evaluations".) 7. Out Post programming. 8. Out Personal or Post Org Board. 9. Wrong purpose or products or products unknown. The Cramming Officer does not do all the handling on staff but gets the person to work with other staff in Cramming or bring in fellow staff to work with and the Cramming Off sees that each step is done correctly. The only test of successful Admin Cramming is that those staff crammed are now doing better and their stats are up. 97 Ideally, an Admin Cramming Officer should be an HPCSC/OEC Graduate. If this is not so, then the Admin Cramming Officer must rapidly complete His/her hat checksheet and embark on a study program of all OEC Volumes in order to be able to fully function on post. For Why Finding he must know the Data Series PLs and how to handle an E-Meter and have an OK to L&N. Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:CH:JK:JE:nt.jh Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 98  Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=3 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 4RB HIGH CRIME CHECKOUTS AND TECHNICAL OKs  Type = 12 iDate=12/12/71 Issue=10 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=5/9/72 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=9/6/73 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=10/6/73 Issue=0 Rev=5 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 8 MARCH 1975 Issue III Remimeo Revises, Combines & Cancels BTB 12 Dec 71RA, Issue X, Cramming Series 4RA, BTB 5 Sept 72RA, Cramming Series 11RA, BTB 9 June 73RA, Cramming Series 17RA, BTB 10 June 73, Issue V, Cramming Series 22. Cramming Series 4RB HIGH CRIME CHECKOUTS AND TECHNICAL OKs (Ref: HCO PLs 7th & 8th Mar 66, High Crime) All new Bulletins by Class or technical PLs issued are checked out on all HGC Auditors and Internes by the Cramming Officer within 24 hours of receipt. The Cramming Officer has these main actions which he ensures are done by all HGC Auditors, C/Ses, and Internes: A. That they read the new Bulletin fully. B. That all misunderstood words are fully cleared, using Method 3 & Method 4. Starrate checkout is then done by the Cramming Officer or Interne Supervisor. C. Clay Demos are done of the key principles in the new Rundown. D. That all new procedures or Rundowns are additionally drilled, including E-Meter drills if required by the procedure, in Cramming. E. Writes up a list of "Okays to Audit" for the procedure or Rundown and sends to D of P for use in Pc assignment. Any confused technical questions, strange ideas or considerations expressed are immediately handled with Word Clearing. All Case Supervisors and Tech and Qual personnel on technical posts must also check out on all new Bulletins and technical Policy Letters. They do A, B and C above. The Cramming Officer must have a special High Crimes New Issues Log Book. He lists down one side of the page the names of all the personnel involved. Across the top of the page, he lists the appropriate HCO (or Board) Bulletin or Policy Letter, with a line going down the page. ______________________________________________________________________________ | | HCO B | BTB | HCOPL | HCO B | HCO B | HCOPL | HCO B | | NAME | 2 Aug |10 Aug |13 Aug |20 Aug |22 Aug |23 Aug |1 Sept | | | 1972 | 1972 | 1972 | 1972 | 1972 | 1972 | 1972 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Mary Jones | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Bill Smith | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | John Brown | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | Date | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Etc. | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Etc. | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 99 When a new HCO (or Board) Bulletin or technical Policy Letter arrives in the Org a copy must go immediately to the Cramming Officer. He logs it in his book and ensures that sufficient copies are made immediately available for checkouts to be done within 24 hours of receipt. High Crime checkouts are done by Auditors to their highest Class. For example, Class VIIIs would check out on all new issues. An HDC would check out on any new Dianetic issues. A Class IV would check out on all Class IV issues. Where an issue is not applicable to an Auditor or staff member, a slash is put on his section of the book when the issue is entered. A Supervisor would be logged to check out on any new Supervision or Study Tech Bulletins or PLs. The C/S checks out on all new issues. High Crime Checkouts can be done by the Cramming Officer or Interne Super. The Cramming Officer will retain the High Crime Log Book and continue to be responsible for them being in PT. Any High Crime Checkouts done by the Interne Super must be logged in the book by the Interne Super daily. MIMEO DELAYS The Cramming Officer must make a special report to CS-7, CS-1 and CS-5 at Flag if there is a delay in the supply of Bulletins and Policy Letters into his/her Org. This is a serious matter and must be reported immediately. Mimeo Checklists of all issues are sent from Flag to the Orgs periodically. ETHICS INSPECTIONS The Ethics Officer should inspect the High Crime Log Book weekly to ensure that checkouts are in PT. If the checkouts are not in PT, he must call an Ethics Hearing on the Cramming Officer and chit the Qual Sec. Violations of High Crime Policies are not to be treated lightly and are handled per HCO PL 8 Mar 66, "High Crime". Attestations are not accepted on any High Crime Checkouts. TECHNICAL OKs Any person who does a technical action must get an OK to do such an action from the Cramming Officer or Interne Super. This includes Auditors, Supervisors, Pc Examiners, Personnel Programmers, all Qual auditing correction actions, Word Clearers, C/Ses, D of P technical actions, such as PTS Interviews, Two-Way Comm, MLOs who do Assists, etc. There are a few terminals outside of Tech and Qual who do technical actions who should also get a Qual OK and these are the Ethics Officer for PTS Interviews and handling and the Success Officer on his meter handling of completions. If a new auditing rundown comes out, the C/S is expected to get an OK to C/S that action from Qual. The way to put this in on any existing staff who do not have such OKs is to make up a list of what needs to be done and then give a short time limit on the completion. Do not use this Policy to stop existing production. If the OKs have not been given, pull them in and get them done. In such a case, the Qual Sec, Cramming Officer and Interne Super would be expected to work together to get it done. OKs may be withdrawn by the Qual Sec, Cramming Officer, or C/S if found to have been falsely issued by reason of repeated flubs. 100 Attestation is not accepted in Qual for OKs to Audit. Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:CH:JK:JE:nt.jh Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED  Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=4 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 5RB TRs IN CRAMMING  Type = 12 iDate=12/12/71 Issue=11 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=14/9/72 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=15/11/72 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 8 MARCH 1975 Issue IV Remimeo Revises, Combines & Cancels BTB 12 Dec 71RA, Issue XI, Cramming Series 5RA, BTB 14 Sept 72R, Cramming Series 12R, BTB 15 Nov 72R, Cramming Series 13R. Cramming Series 5RB TRs IN CRAMMING There is no restriction whatsoever on doing TRs in Cramming. It is not rote and is done on each Cramming cycle. ALL TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ARE EXPECTED TO CONTINUE TO WORK ON AND IMPROVE THEIR TRS THROUGHOUT ALL TRAINING AND INTERNESHIPS AND SERVICE IN AN ORG OR FRANCHISE. The LRH Model Auditing Tapes and materials are the only guide to perfect TRs. Any questions or queries or strange ideas about any TRs must be immediately handled with Word Clearing on the relevant material. Beware of quickie TRs or Auditors who do five minutes of TR 0 and then say that they have improved their TR 0 and confront. Watch out for Auditors who cannot or will not do two hours of confront or Auditors who cannot deliver 2 1/2 hours of auditing and short session. Be on the lookout for Supervisors whose students blow or who have small classroom attendance. The Interne Supervisor is responsible for forcing in daily TRs on Auditors, Internes, C/Ses, Cramming Officer, Pc Examiner, Word Clearers, Basic Courses Supervisors, Success Officer, D of P and D of T. Auditors and Internes get their TRs training done outside of production hours and time must be provided daily for this to be done. Each personnel may not be prevented from doing daily TRs. Technical reports show that some Auditors do not get in their minimum 25 WD hours snowing the vital need for lots of TRs to be done. Poor scheduling keeps Auditors waiting, and unnecessarily lengthens their auditing day, leaving no time for daily TRs. Daily TRs and Auditor and Interne training times actually reduce time in Cramming. Auditors and Supervisors do not have cases and are expected to work on their TRs daily. Special TRs booklets and tapes have been compiled for Cramming Officers to assist them to get real correction of TRs done in Cramming. These materials comprise all materials on TRs 0 to 4, Upper Indocs and the Auditing Comm Cycle, issued as individual booklets on each TR. The only way to correct TRs is by taking each one individually and tackling it as a subject on its own. This is made possible through the individual booklets and tapes. The tapes also must be listened to from the viewpoint of the TR being corrected. The Auditor, Interne or Supervisor has the LRH Model Auditing tapes and special LRH 102 TRs demonstration tapes to use. They must be taught to listen to a single TR in order to correct it. The Cramming Off must know these materials cold so that he can direct the person to the exact material every time to resolve the situation. Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides The Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:CH:JK:JE:nt.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED  Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Commodore's Staff Aides The Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=5 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  CRAMMING EXPERTISE  Type = 12 iDate=12/12/71 Issue=13 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=2/9/72 Issue=3 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0 Type = 12 iDate=21/1/73 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 8 MARCH 1975 Issue V Remimeo Revises, Combines & Cancels BTB 12 Dec 71R, Issue XIII, Cramming Series 7R, BTB 2 Sept 72R, Issue III, Cramming Series 10, BTB 21 Jan 73RA, Cramming Series 14RA. Cramming Series 6RA CRAMMING EXPERTISE All Cramming Officers are to put up a large well lettered, permanent sign in the Cramming area: GOOD CRAMMING IS THE KEY TO FLUBLESS AUDITORS AND AUDITING LRH A Cramming Officer must be an experienced Auditor up to the highest Class of auditing he/she is Supervising. A failed Auditor on post will only result in failed correction cycles. Another Cramming Officer is appointed to handle students and admin cramming cycles. This has been proven a successful action. The Cramming Officer keeps a log book of all Cramming actions done and weekly reviews the types of Cramming actions going on with the different Auditors. He could find at this point that a certain Auditor has been crammed on three slightly different but related areas. He can, at this point, call the Auditor in and handle the more basic outness isolated. Packs of materials to do with a subject or action should be compiled for Cramming -- e.g. Rudiments, Listing and Nulling, TRs, etc. If an Auditor goofs on Rudiments, he reviews the little pack, word clears it, drills the actions, etc. Word Clearing is used very heavily in Cramming: Auditors are not "sent to Word Clearing" when it is required. They are just twinned up and word clear the materials ordered in Cramming. If a student is consistently goofing on data contained in a particular level or course, he can be ordered to word clear the entire materials on that checksheet in Cramming. When certain materials have already been word cleared and the student is still goofing on the procedure, it must be considered that he has a confusion re the sequences of actions and the student must be very heavily drilled on that action. The Cramming Officer has the whole resources of the Org Library to call upon. Many books contain key data applicable to every level and these should be used liberally in Cramming. If an Auditor is showing ignorance of a datum or rule, it is quite possible that he never read it. The three main areas investigated in Cramming are: 1. The student or Auditor never read it. The exact data may not have been on an earlier checksheet done on a subject. So one always ensures that all the data is to hand and reviewed. 104 2. The student or Auditor has misunderstoods in the material. Handled fully with Word Clearing, always on the whole text of the materials goofed. 3. The student or Interne has confusions on the sequences of actions. Handled by drilling. Can also be handled by HC lists. One point that the Cramming Officer must watch out for is overlong Cramming Orders. An overlong Cramming Order would be one that contained more than four or five issues: Such a Cramming Order is actually a training cycle and should be done in staff training. Overlong Cramming cycles tend to bring about a backlog because they cannot be handled quickly and completed. Qual is a corrective Division and should not get into routine training actions. Routine training belongs in the Tech Division. The Cramming Officer does NOT accept overlong Cramming Orders. NO F/N AT EXAMS Per C/S Series 86RB, BTB 20 Jan 73RB, "The Red Tag Line", the Examiner sends a copy of the list of the day's Red Tags to the Cramming Officer. A Red Tag Pc report must lead at once to Cramming of the Auditor, the D of P, the C/S and the Tech Sec. They are immediately crammed on the appropriate materials with all Mis-U words cleared up and any Why found on the meter as needful. Any discovered instance of a non-F/N VGIs folder not being relayed to the C/S, and thus discovered by the Cramming Officer, must result in an immediate Ethics hearing for No Report. Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides The Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:CH:JK:JE:nt.jh Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 105  Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 Approved by Guardian WW FB Ad Council FB Exec Council LRH Comm FB Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides The Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  CRAMMING OFFICER STATISTIC  Type = 12 iDate=12/12/71 Issue=13 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Cramming Offs Issue VI  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 8 MARCH 1975 Remimeo Cramming Offs Issue VI CANCELS BTB 12 DECEMBER 1971R Issue XIII Cramming Series 7RA CRAMMING OFFICER STATISTIC The statistic of the Cramming Officer is: TOTAL CRAMMING POINTS FOR THE WEEK. The Cramming Points for the Week are obtained by: 1. 2 points for all Cramming actions completed on Tech, Qual or HCO staff including Word Clearing on the appropriate materials, any Why Finding needed, accompanied by an acceptable Success Story. 2. 1 point for all Cramming actions completed on Dissem, Treasury, Distribution and Exec Division staff, including Word Clearing on the appropriate materials, and Why Finding needed, accompanied by an acceptable Success Story. 3. 2 points for each issue or tape or drill completed by Auditors, Internes and Tech or Qual personnel on Okay to Audit checksheets or Okay to do technical posts with key materials fully Word Cleared, starrated and drilled. Includes Okays to Audit for new Rundowns as issued so long as any key related HCO Bs and metering required are studied, drilled, the procedure drilled on a doll, and after a Tech Course in each case. 4. 2 points for each completed Cramming cycle originated by the Cramming Officer which handles a more basic or broader area of situation to the original just handled or a needed Retread in Tech on Tech, Qual or HCO personnel (per Cramming Series 25). 5. 1 point for each completed Cramming cycle originated by the Cramming Officer which handles a more basic or broader area of situation to the original just handled or Hat or Series Retread in Tech on Dissem, Treasury, Distribution or Executive Division personnel. 6. 2 points for each new Bulletin or Technical Policy starrated by all concerned within 48 hours of receipt. Note that there is a penalty of five points for each undone Cramming Order caused by lack of materials, Word Clearers or Tech or Admin Cramming personnel if stale dated 48 hours. Note that this stat is not the same as the Qual GDS and contains additional points to cover the Cramming Officer Post duties. Ens. Judy Ziff, CS-5 Approved by the Board of Issues for the BDCS;BofI:JZ:mhg.nt.jh BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Copyright $c 1975 of the by L. Ron Hubbard CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 106  Ens. Judy Ziff, CS-5 Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=12/12/71 Volnndling the Pc as a Being, or student basics and staff basics) and gets that crammed, too. The Cramming Officer is not bound to accept any Cramming Order if his own investigation proves that something else entirely needs correction. It is part of the Cramming Officer's responsibility to prevent Wrong Target correction. According to Qual Senior Datum, the Cramming Officer must not take orders but must do his own investigation and handling. It will be found that there is usually a valid corrective action to be made. He does not just waive the cycle if the original order is incorrect. He finds out what is really wrong and corrects that. Written & Revised by CS-5 Ensign Judy Ziff Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:BofI:JZ:mh.rd Copyright $c 1971, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 107  Written & Revised by CS-5 Ensign Judy Ziff Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/12/71 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 9 C/S Series 68 THE C/S AND CRAMMING CYCLES  Type = 11 iDate=8/12/71 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo All C/Ses Cramming Officer Hat  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN Remimeo 8 DECEMBER 1971 All C/Ses Reissued 3 July 1974 as BTB Cramming Officer Hat CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 8 DECEMBER 1971 SAME TITLE Cramming Series 9 C/S Series 68 THE C/S AND CRAMMING CYCLES A fast way for any C/S to go into Doubt about the skills of his Auditors is to send them to Cramming and get only a "done" back. Cramming is there to find the real cause of any error. So if the real WHY is not made known to the C/S he has a "something is wrong with Joe's TRs" which hangs up in time and never is resolved. A response from Cramming to an order from the C/S to "check his TRs -- Pc's TA went low in session --" which states: "I checked his TRs and they are good. But he audited the Pc in a room that was overhot and the cans were too big. He has been drilled on Auditor's Code and session environment handling and HCO Bs on TA Errors and now has this down pat. It won't happen again," leaves the C/S in no doubt as to what really happened. What's more he can order this repaired on the Pc by a "2wc on times he felt worried about his TA or F/Ns" taken E/Sim to F/N (which will clear it up). Furthermore the Auditor now knows that the C/S knows what the real error was, doesn't get hung with a withhold or a false idea about his TRs from the C/S. In essence one is putting the Exact Truth on the line. So the following rule is now mandatory in all HGCs and Quals: THE CRAMMING OFFICER IS ALWAYS ON ANY CRAMMING ORDER TO REPORT THE EXACT OUTNESSES FOUND OR THE EXACT SESSION GOOFS, WITH ANY ADDITIONAL DATA, IN DETAIL, TO THE C/S. A C/S receiving a Cramming Order back giving no Why or an unreal Why that does not make sense when compared with the session and its results MUST return the Cramming Slip to the Cramming Officer requiring the Why be found or the wrong Why abandoned and the real Why found and corrected. A good C/S should know his Data Series down cold and be able to spot such outpoints at once. He would go over the session with the Cramming Officer and point out what it is he wants handled. This data is not theoretical but is taken from actual practical experience in C/Sing. Flag Dept 12 C/S Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU BDCS:SW.AL.MH.RL.mh.jh for the Copyright $c 1971, 1974 BOARD OF DIRECTORS by L. Ron Hubbard of the ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY 108  Flag Dept 12 C/S Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 11 iDate=10/6/73 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=2 rDate=19/9/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 10RA CRAMMING   Remimeo Qual Secs Cramming Offs  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 JUNE 1973RA Remimeo Issue I Qual Secs REVISED 20 FEBRUARY 1974 Cramming REISSUED 19 SEPTEMBER 1974 Offs (Only change is signature) Cramming Series 10RA CRAMMING The datum that "Qual does not take orders" solves the Admin Cramming dilemma of the staff member crammed four times on the Dev-T Pack. It is up to Qual to handle, fully and totally. This means, not following the exact order, but finding the real Why on the person and handling it at once. Qual's function is correction. By policy Qual does not take orders on What to do to correct. Where an exec wants certain material covered, that's okay. Cover it. But find the WHY! And on a repeat order, realize it was a wrong Why and really work it over. Several staff have been crammed several times on the Dev-T Pack. Means Qual takes orders. The PRODUCT of Qual Admin Cramming is a functioning producing staff member who can produce on post. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1973, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 109  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 12 iDate=10/6/73 Volnum=0 Issue=4 Rev=2 rDate=27/11/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 11RA CRAMMING OFFICER POST REQUIREMENTS  Type = 12 iDate=10/6/73 Issue=4 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Qual Secs HAS Hats Off Cr Offs  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 10 JUNE 1973RA Issue IV Revised & Reissued 7 August 1974 as BTB Revised 27 November 1974 Remimeo Qual Secs CANCELS HAS BTB OF 10 JUNE 1973R Hats Off Issue IV Cr Offs SAME TITLE Cramming Series 11RA CRAMMING OFFICER POST REQUIREMENTS A Tech Cramming Officer is not only a top Auditor for his Class but he must also be a top Supervisor. The minimum requirements for being a Cramming Officer are: A. Experienced Classed Auditor of Class TV HDC or above in a lower Org and not lower than VIII in an SH or AO Org. B. Mini Course Super Course. C. Professional Word Clearer's Course Graduate. D. Trained in the skills of Cramming and Why Finding per the BPL 12 June 73R, Rev 31 Aug 74, "Cramming Officer Hat Checksheet". Whilst it is known there is a lot of good Cramming being done in Orgs, the quality of Cramming needs to be increased in order to back up the current expansion occurring in Orgs. The Cramming Officer is second only to the Qual Sec in technical quality and post expertise. In order to upgrade Cramming quality, the following should be done: A. Get the current Cramming Officer completed on all post requirements and operating efficiently. He handles tech and admin Cramming. B. Post an Admin Cramming Officer who apprentices under the current Cramming Officer, taking the load of Admin Cramming and allowing the Cramming Officer to take on the full duties of Tech Cramming Officer, handling all Auditors, C/Ses, Internes, Supervisors, students and technical Cramming actions. C. Both the Tech and Admin Cramming Officers enroll onto the HPCSC and get it completed. D. The Tech Cramming Officer does any Tech Courses not yet completed in his Org, in study time. E. The Admin Cramming Officer does the OEC, commencing with Vol 5, in study time. And thus, we have expert Tech and Admin Cramming Officers on post. 110 A busy Cramming Officer needs a Qual Page to get people in for their Cramming cycles and High Crime checkouts, otherwise he can waste valuable minutes and hours chasing up people. The Qual Page can also get needed Pc folders or packs and materials from the Library as a service to the Cramming Officer. The high degree of personal attention in Cramming brings about a situation whereby a Cramming Officer can handle about 20 students at one time before he will tend to become overloaded. In this case, a second Cramming Officer must be added to reinforce the area. The Qual Sec and Org Officer must be alert to this or the area will get jammed and production lines slowed. The target being worked towards is: 1. A Class VIII or IX Ex Dn HPCSC Tech Cramming Officer. 2. A Class IV OEC HPCSC Admin Cramming Officer. Then you would really see the fur fly. As these levels of post training are acquired, we will see a gradient and continual improvement in the tech and admin quality, existence of Source and use of materials of Dianetics and Scientology in Orgs. Orgs will become fully On Tech, On Policy and In Ethics and will be truly KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING. Written & Revised by CS-5 Ensign Judy Ziff Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:BofI:JZ:mh.rd Copyright $c 1973, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 111  Written & Revised by CS-5 Ensign Judy Ziff Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=12/6/73 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 12 THE TOOLS OF CRAMMING  Type = 11 iDate=12/6/73 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Cramming Offs C/Ses Qual Secs  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 12 JUNE 1973 Remimeo Issue I Cramming Offs Reissued 1 July 1974 as BTB C/Ses Qual Secs CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 12 JUNE 1973 Issue I SAME TITLE Cramming Series 12 THE TOOLS OF CRAMMING A number of LRH Cramming cycles on Auditors, C/Ses, Execs and Admin people have been compiled for this Bulletin. They should provide very helpful guidance to the specific approach to individual correction in all spheres by a Cramming Officer. AUDITORS: 1. "Auditor's missed an F/N. Check meter position and general admin habits that would cause this. She must be able to see the meter, Pc and admin in one look. Check eyesight. Also Code and TRs, of course." LRH 13 May 72 2. "Worksheets utterly indecipherable. She 'clarifies' by over-writing words in blue, instead of correctly printing above in red. Have her practice legible handwriting rapidly until she can." LRH 13 May 72 3. "Does not put enough down in a worksheet to make sense. She must learn what to put down, what not to. Things that move TA, Dn step numbers, items that fall on 2wc and overts and withholds. And enough sense so a C/S can use it and see what happened." LRH 13 May 72 4. "Commits auditing error, blames Pc. Get off her overts on Pcs. Check her out on Standard Dianetic C/Sing." LRH 12 May 72 5. "Missed first item's F/N on list. L&N laws. Metering. Check it for position during admin." LRH 3 June 72 6. "Metering. Placement of meter may have been upset by concentration on admin. Missed a no-read on the Pc. Or isn't checking. Get metering and admin sorted out as a co-ordination." LRH 2 June 72 7. "Flubbed ARC Break handling. Look at folder. Get the Mis-U and drill her on ARC Break handling." LRH 6 June 72 8. "WCing over out lists, out ruds. M6 on key words of her post. M4 on programming sequences. In clay purpose of a program. In clay purpose of an Auditor." LRH 18 July 72 112 9. "Auditor breaks up when Pcs say something funny by report. Clobbered the F/N. He also assessed an uncleared list and missed Mis-U words and didn't handle even when it read. TRs the HARD WAY." LRH 16 April 72 10. "D of P is to do C/S Series 57. A little can be done each day until he has completed it. It must be reported and metered daily for Mis-Us and honestly done." LRH 15 June 72 11. "Auditor's Pc is talking long long long. Clear Invalidation. Then work out in clay what Invalidation is and what it would do to a Pc. Then in clay how a Pc would Itsa overlong on out TR 2. Then TRs." LRH 21 May 72 12. "Cleared words on a Sec Check. Couldn't follow an ARC Break chain down or pull a withhold. Just sat and watched a meter. Didn't do C/S. No session control. 'Auditor Rights' unknown. Retread Academy Levels 0 to IV. TRs." LRH 10 Sept 72 C/S I/T: 1. "C/S Series M4. Then Study it. He missed obvious things and doesn't head Auditors into a dead right correction." 2. "Get this C/S to do C/S Series 57 as a familiarity action on the HGC. It can be done a bit each day. It must be metered as honestly done." LRH 15 June 72 3. "Gave a well done to an Auditor for Word Clearing over an Out List Out Rud Pc. M6 on his post. M4 on C/S Series, about sequence of Out Lists, ruds in programming. In clay on purpose and actions of a C/S in handling cases. In clay on purpose and actions of a C/S in handling Auditors." LRH 10 Sept 72 AUDITOR ADMIN CRAMMING: 1. "Violation of HCO PL 21 Nov 62, CSW. C/S opinion requested but no folder, no data. Pack of Dev-T PLs star-rate. CSW in clay and how Dev-T overloads lines." LRH 2 Mar 72 2. "Dev-T -- challenging a cramming order on a Dev-T folder with more Dev-T." LRH 1 Mar 72 3. "Aside from any Out Tech, this Auditor, out of two folders, has in each one left one item on a list unhandled. Causes C/S Dev-T. M4 and star-rate Dev-T pack." LRH 12 April 72 EXECS AND ADMIN PERSONNEL: 1. "Sent an incomplete program up. Cram her on PL 'Not Dones, Half Dones and Backlogs'. On Dev-T pack." LRH 9 Aug 72 2. "Is flunking on evaluation. Method 7 WC Handle. Method 4 Data Series. Get him to define a Why per Data Series. Have him rattle off all the outpoints until he can, with examples of each." LRH 11 July 72 113 3. "There is something adrift here. Possibly confront or people or getting people to work. She operates as an HCO Expediter. She is perfectly willing to work personally and does a good job. However, her actions here tell us why her Org fell apart with her as Org Officer. Instead of organizing -- org boarding people, recruiting, training, hatting, putting in Ethics, etc -- she clears up backlogs as an HCO Expediter. She does not get people to get the work done but does the work. Establish the fact -- (1) Can she handle PEOPLE? (2) Can she recruit? (3) Can she train? (4) Can she compile packs? (5) Does she know theory of org board and posting? (6) Does she know Ethics, including Investigation? (7) Does she believe she can get people to work? Or is it 'faster to do it yourself'? Straighten out what is found." LRH 22 Jan 72 4. "Did not follow orders. (1) Meter check for Mis-Us related to orders, key post terms. Clear up. (2) Check up on his attitude to his post. (3) Find the bug on reasonableness on post." LRH 10 Feb 72 5. "Posting with a gap in Qual. No formal coverage of Interne Super functions while Interne Super on leave, thus overloading the QEO with Interne Super. HAS-HCO Cope Off Hat M4. In clay, posting an org board from the top down to cover all lower functions and why one does, shown in clay." LRH 12 Mar 72 6. "Let her area collapse. (1) Check WC1. (2) Check managing by stats PLs for Mis-Us. (3) WC4 Data Series. (4) Have her do evals that don't blame wrong targets." LRH 27 Jan 72 7. "Cut a comm line. Messed up an evening schedule by saying she 'didn't know'. Is wholly unaware of an existing scene. Attention fixed on something, easily upset, withholdy. M4 on 'Policy'. M4 on post. Dev-T pack star-rate." LRH 5 Mar 72 8. "Blames other activities for own stats and failures instead of policing and handling own area. Does not know a Why by definition is something you can use to improve a scene. (1) Check WC1 for errors. (2) WC4 on Data Series. Get her to do numerous evals that have Whys you can handle (that don't put it on God or other Divs)." LRH 27 Jan 72 9. "Data Series M4 and in clay. Gave me an eval lacking in CONSISTENCY (Why on one subject area -- program on another). Did not locate the right Why." LRH 9 Mar 72 10. "She is to be crammed on (1) What files are. (2) What the uses of files are. (3) What her products are." LRH 15 Mar 72 11. "Is not being a Product Off for his Div. Stats way down. Out Admin and Out Ethics in Div. Find out why he can't get production or quality. Cram." LRH 22 Mar 72 These are just a few examples of LRH Cramming cycles to give Cramming Officers more real data on how to USE the tools of Qual to get his product of a corrected individual who can now function in his area. In all cases, when the basic outnesses were corrected, one or more of the three major stable data of Cramming were present: (1) the person had not read or studied 114 the materials, or (2) he had misunderstoods in the materials, or (3) he had not drilled the actions or sequences of actions to a point of competence. In all cases, also, all tech personnel had their TRs corrected and improved while in Cramming. All the tools of Tech Cramming are applicable into Admin Cramming, as can be seen by the above examples. Admin Cramming is vital to pick up, revitalize and get a floundering Division, area or Org on its feet and operating. Word Clearing plays a key role in Cramming, so there must always be a minimum of two Word Clearers in any Org. If an enterprising Qual Sec wants to get some Word Clearers, his best action would be to word clear the HAS and all HCO staff on their posts and duties until they get the message on the value of Word Clearing. Any Qual Sec who has no Word Clearers or Word Clearing being done in his Div should be ordered to extensive Word Clearing by his CO or ED, and then crammed in his own Qual on his hat. Cramming is not an area for weaklings or persons with no confront. It is probably one of the single most versatile posts in an Org. He has all types of staff with all types of flubs and outnesses to handle. He must use every skill he has, every piece of knowledge about Scientology and Dianetics, every piece of Policy, to handle his everyday work cycles. Any piece of tech by LRH, if a relevant handling for the situation, is grist for the mill of a Cramming Officer. A good Cramming Officer, who uses all the tools of Qual to get his product, is worth his weight in gold. He is highly valued. Ens. Judy Ziff CS-5 Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:SW:AL:MH:JZ:mh.rd Copyright $c 1973, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 115  Ens. Judy Ziff CS-5 Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=12/6/73 Volnum=0 Issue=2 Rev=2 rDate=4/12/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 13RA CRAMMING HEAVY HUSSAR HANDLING FOR A BADLY BOGGED TECH PERSONNEL OR STAFF MEMBER  Type = 12 iDate=12/6/73 Issue=2 Rev=1 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Cramming Officers  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 12 JUNE 1973RA Issue II Revised & Reissued 25 July 1974 as BTB Revised 4 December 1974 (Revision in this type style) Remimeo Cramming Officers CANCELS BTB OF 12 JUNE 1973R Issue II SAME TITLE Cramming Series 13RA CRAMMING HEAVY HUSSAR HANDLING FOR A BADLY BOGGED TECH PERSONNEL OR STAFF MEMBER There comes a time in every Cramming Officer's life when he has to face the situation of de-bugging a badly bogged tech personnel or staff member. This is caused by these factors: A. Staff member refuses to do the Cramming Orders through post overwhelm or incorrect Cramming Orders not corrected by the Cramming Officer, thus violation of Qual Senior Datum. B. Staff member has done the Cramming Orders to apparent GIs and F/N but has not been fully honest in Cramming, thus causing by-passed Whys and post inefficiency. This person is glib and lacks confront. C. Staff member was never Crammed in the first place. There is a way out which can unlock the situation, enable the real data to be located, so the Why or Whys can be found and handled. THE METHOD This method works in Tech and Admin Cramming quite efficiently, if thoroughly and honestly done. 1. Tell the person what you are going to do. Get his agreement to proceed and be assured of his participation. 2. Get the person to write up a full list of all done or not done Cramming Orders, with exact specifics, and all outnesses listed separately. Details may have to be obtained from the Cramming Log Book. Every time something is repeated, put a slash alongside the item. 3. Now ask the person to write up any other Off Policy or Out Tech actions being done or not done on post which have not been picked up. 4. Add these to the original list, putting a slash every time an item is repeated. 5. Now work with the staff member to group the outnesses together by subject area, level or basic. 116 A. Tech personnel outnesses will sort out into training levels or into basics of auditing, course or case supervision, as applicable. B. Admin staff outnesses will sort out into staff member basics, key hat duties, Scn basics and other categories listed in BTB 7 June 73RA, "Admin Cramming". 6. Add up all the slashes of the combined items. This will locate the Major Situation, as the one with the greatest number of slashes, and the Minor Situations, the remainder in order of number of slashes. 7. Take up the Major Situation and indicate this to the staff member. This should bring in VGIs. If not, go back and redo the above steps, adding any missed data, until you do get VGIs. 8. Now find the Why for the Major Situation. This must bring in VGIs. The Why Funding is done on the Meter. 9. Work out a Handling for the Why which will handle the hell out of it. 10. Get the Handling done immediately. 11. When the Handling has been completed, send the staff member to the Pc Examiner. If no F/N VGIs, find the right Why and complete the Handling indicated by the right Why. 12. End off the Handling of the Major Situation to F/N VGIs. 13. Now take up the Minor Situations in order of greatest number of slashes, and find each Why and handle separately. 14. There can be an EP to this action. The person has a tremendous resurgence of post efficiency, stats and morale and he is doing well again. End off the Cramming at that point, but see that remaining Situations and Whys are handled either in Interne or staff training. This action can be done on an old-time Auditor who is anxious to return to auditing, in order to clean up the past major areas of failure. An old HPA/HCA could get this action done in Cramming, for a fee, of course, prior to doing an Academy Retrain. The Cramming Officer must be familiar with all the tools he has at his disposal for the handling: HC List, Slow Eval Assessment, C/S 78 Wrong Why Finding Correction, Word Clearing, TRs, Admin TRs, Reach and Withdraw, 3 May 72 PL, C/S 53RI, PTS Tech, confront of MEST and work areas, various study and staff correction lists, Pre-PCRD assessment, disagreement checks, Integrity Processing, writing drill, plus the entirety of the Technology and Policy and Books of Dianetics and Scientology. In working with lists which contain training and auditing correction actions, the relevant training correction actions are done in Qual and the Assessment form is routed to the Pc folder for the auditing actions needed to be done and Staff C/S advised. Do not buy case reasons as Whys for staff member post flubs. There are always post or staff reasons for flubs. However, if the Cramming Officer finds that staff on his lines are mis-audited or not audited, he should chit the D of P and Staff Training Officer for failure to take responsibility for seeing that staff get regular Intensives on a rotational basis, and that staff members in trouble do have their folders checked for Out Tech and do get corrected. When it is found that the staff member never studied or checked out on key data or post hat material in the first place, the correct Cramming handling is to cram in the key material so the person can now function, and see that a post training program is written up by Pers Programmer and done in staff training. 117 The one to five steps in the method above do not take more than a half to one hour at the most. Do not hesitate to use TRs and drills on staff members in Admin Cramming. They need TRs and drilling as much as Tech personnel. WHAT TO DO WITH THE STAFF MEMBER WHO HAS NEVER BEEN CRAMMED IN THE FIRST PLACE As Admin Cramming starts being used more regularly in Orgs, Cramming Officers will find themselves with bogged staff who have never had any Cramming. He will then be handling an actual backlog situation which is unexpressed. In this case, he should get a write-up from the Div Head involved of exactly how this person has been operating and the outnesses observed. The Cramming Officer should then get the person himself to write up what he considers that he has been or has not been doing, plus a write-up of exactly what post training the person has had. The Cramming Off goes over the data with the person and they sort out and group the outnesses as found, thus locating the key outness to be handled. For this person, the handling will be what will rapidly handle the Why found and enable the person to function on post. This action must be followed by an immediate post program by the Personnel Programmer and completed in staff training. The Cramming Off must report Div Heads who won't cram their staff to the Qual Sec for Cramming correction orders on the Div Heads themselves. The steps of this Bulletin are remarkably efficient in locating major hidden areas of outness in order to be able to handle them. The hardest part in handling a person who is badly bogged is just where do you start? These steps give an exact sequence to do this and are incredibly easy to do. Ens. Judy Ziff CS-5 Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:MD:AL:MH:JZ:mh.rd Copyright $c 1973, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 118  Ens. Judy Ziff CS-5 Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Commodore's Staff Aides Approved by the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 11 iDate=15/10/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  IMPORTANT Cramming Series 14 CRAMMING OVER OUT RUDS   Remimeo Cramming Officers  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 15 OCTOBER 1974 Cramming Officers IMPORTANT Cramming Series 14 CRAMMING OVER OUT RUDS A Cramming Officer can fail in his efforts to correct a flubbing staff member if he tries to cram over out ruds. Cramming done over an ARC Break, like Auditing, will result in the person getting worse, more out of comm or misemotional. Cramming a person over a problem or W/H will produce no change so no correction will occur. Out ruds are easy to spot. The person with an ARC Break, won't talk or is misemotional or antagonistic. A problem produces fixated attention that prevents Cramming from finding the actual area of difficulty. Natter and 1.1 remarks means a withhold. Recently a musician being crammed kept bringing up a dispatch that he was in mystery about concerning the group. Every time it was mentioned it read or BDed yet the Cramming Officer continued "Cramming" him and never handled it. So no product. I sat the musician down, told him he was crammed over a problem, the mystery about the dispatch, cleaned it up by getting the dispatch and letting him go over it, made sure the problem was handled then found the area of misunderstood and traced it back to an early age and the Why fell right out. And I got the Cramming Officer crammed by the Senior C/S and found her Why too. So the moral of the story is DON'T CRAM OVER OUT RUDS. It is too costly in lost production and flaps. CRAMMING OFFICER FLUBS When the Cramming Officer flubs you must get him crammed fast because he will repeat the error on others and there goes your results. In such cases, get him crammed immediately by the Qual Sec or Senior C/S. If it is the Qual Sec who has flubbed, then he is crammed either by the Senior C/S or the Keeper of Tech. INCOMPLETE HANDLING It is often not enough just to correct a Why and do no further handling in Cramming. Most Cramming Cycles reveal a broader area of situation which must also be handled. An example is the Auditor who flubs on an L4BR and during the Cramming reveals he never really listened to the key SHSBC L&N tapes. 119 The Cramming Officer who does not also program the Auditor for a review of those tapes would not have fully corrected that Auditor. You could accurately predict future L&N flubs and pc upsets. A subsequent program such as the one above would count as an additional Cramming Cycle for the Cramming Officer, or a Retread if lengthy and would count as additional points. Therefore the maxim of Cramming is: HANDLE THE HELL OUT OF IT. Honest correction must be fully and completely done for the sake of the public and the org as well as the staff member. SUMMARY Cramming success depends on not Cramming over out ruds and on fully handling all areas of confusion or weakness. Follow these operating rules and you will enjoy rave results and real correction. And your org stats will soar. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 120  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=18/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 15 METER USE IN QUAL   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1975 Remimeo Cramming Series 15 METER USE IN QUAL All Cramming actions done in Qual must be done on a meter. This means metered Why Finding, checks for misunderstoods, scouting for areas of uncertainty, completion of clay demos and word clearing. Neglect of the full use of the meter has led to half done, ineffective and often repeat Cramming cycles as the person's why or M/U was never found in the first place. Even worse, a wrong why can act as a wrong list item which brings about case chaos. Every Cramming Officer must know and use all his tools. This includes metering. The meter reveals all. Use it. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:nt.rd Copyright $c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 121  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 22 iDate=6/4/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=16/10/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Cramming Series 16 HOW TO FIND A WHY ON A PERSON AND HANDLE  Type = 21 iDate=6/4/72 Issue=2 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Cramming Officers  BOARD POLICY LETTER 6 APRIL 1972R Remimeo Revised & Reissued 16 October 1975 as BPL Cramming Officers CANCELS HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 APRIL 1972 Issue II SAME TITLE Cramming Series 16 HOW TO FIND A WHY ON A PERSON AND HANDLE (See HCO PL 19 March 1972, Issue II, Data Series 25, "Learning to Use Data Analysis".) The tech of finding a WHY on an individual person is extremely important and is the fundamental tool of the Est 0, Cramming Officer, Dept of Personnel Enhancement and others. The resolution of a major broad WHY can depend on the finding and handling of individual WHYs. EXAMPLE: In LRH ED 174R INT the WHY of failures in Tech and Admin areas was found to be "STUDY TECH NOT IN USE FOR INDIVIDUAL WHYS FOR EACH SUPERVISOR AND STUDENT". A similar example exists where tapes with Scientology materials were not in full or proper use, the WHY being "TAPES WITH SCIENTOLOGY MATERIALS NOT IN USE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL WHY FOR EACH ORG PERSON CONCERNED". In each case, the tech of finding the individual WHY is necessary to handling the broad WHY. This tech is contained in the DATA SERIES PLs and is restated here in brief form for finding the WHY on a person. STEPS 1. Know the Data Series PLs. (Don't have any misunderstood words on them.) 2. Work out exactly what the person should be producing. 3. Work out the ideal scene. 4. Investigate the existing scene. OBSERVE THE SCENE around the person for outpoints related to what the person SHOULD be doing in an Ideal Scene. Verify that there is a situation with that individual and that you know what the situation is. Don't go trying to find the WHY of a no situation. (A bad situation is measured by the difference between existing scene and an Ideal Scene and threat to Ideal Scene.) 5. Ask the person exact specific questions pertaining to the situation. 6. Do not at any time ask the person for the WHY. If the person knew the WHY, the situation wouldn't exist. 7. Use the comm formula and get your questions answered. Don't be diverted by the person's "reasons". 122 8. Note all outpoints. 9. Be alert for the area(s) with the most outpoints which relate to the situation. 10. Verify the data by looking. This will often reveal the major outpoint which leads to the WHY. It must be realized that you are often looking for an OMITTED something, hence a knowledge of the Ideal Scene and product is required. 11. When you find a major outpoint, trace down the chain of outpoints to the WHY. Pull the string by asking more questions in the area of the Major Outpoint. 12. The big crashing outpoint that explains all the other outpoints will be the WHY. 13. The WHY must have something to do with the person. If not, you will have a "Why is God" and it won't resolve. 14. Indicate the WHY to the person. Correct WHYs result in Cogs and VGIs. A wrong WHY can make the person feel degraded, will not bring in VGIs and will not lead to a resolution of the situation. 15. Look over existing resources. 16. Get a Bright Idea of how to handle. 17. Handle or recommend handling so that it stays handled. The handling of the WHY must directly relate to the WHY that was found. EXAMPLES 1. Situation: Supervisor not using study tech. Investigation: Supervisor was observed, found to be very casual with students. No 8-C. Supervisor questioned. All outpoints in area of Supervisor not wanting to tell students what to do and himself not liking to be told what to do. WHY: Big button on control and does not want to control others. WHY was indicated with cognitions and VGIs after initial HE&R on the subject. Handling: Objective processes especially SCS. 2. Situation: Student taking forever on study of tapes. Investigation: Observed student transcribing tapes so he could later look up the words. Didn't know why you don't go past a misunderstood word. WHY: Never studied the study tech. Handling: Primary Rundown. 3. Situation: Staff member not doing his job. Ineffective on post. Investigation: Found out what the person was doing. Found he was given and had been doing the functions of another post. WHY: Accepting illegal orders. Handling: Offload of extraneous functions. Word Clear relevant PLs. 4. Situation: Folder Page backlogging folders. Not getting them through to C/S. Investigation: Questioned Folder Page to find her product. Found it was a C/S not overloaded with folders. 123 WHY: Working for a wrong product. Didn't know required product. Handling: Product Rundown. 5. Situation: D of P not doing standard duties. Letting Pcs stall on lines. Investigation: Checked hat and flow chart. Found flow chart had been done but never referred to and missing all the key points where Pcs can stall on lines. Expecting Pcs to arrive back at HGC of their own accord. WHY: Unawareness of lines and terminals and how they can be influenced. Handling: Line Drills (following pipes and flow lines in an engine room). Make up correct flow chart and drill it. After finding the WHY and getting the handling implemented, the situation is again reviewed to see if it still exists. If so, a wrong WHY was found. The Handling is to redo the steps and get the correct WHY. A WHY which cannot be handled or does not lead toward attainment of the Ideal Scene is of course a wrong WHY. The finding of individual WHYs on persons is normally a very fast action. The WHY is simply found and the handling implemented. The more you do of them, the faster and more expert you become. METERED WHY FINDING When Why Finding is done on a meter, the above steps still pertain; however, meter reads are used to help establish the situation and track down the WHY. Falls or a BD would indicate the right area. The correct WHY would result in F/N, Cog, VGIs. (At this point, you would indicate the WHY and continue with steps 14 -- 16.) Metered Why Finding should end with an F/N. Worksheets are kept. After any Why Finding, metered or not, the person is sent to the Pc Examiner. The worksheets are routed to Tech Services so they can be filed in the person's Pc folder. Training & Services Aide and Dissem Aide by order of L. RON HUBBARD Founder Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 and Molly Gilliam Flag Mission 1234 2nd Reissued as BPL by Flag Mission 1234 2nd Molly Gilliam Approved by the Commodore's Staff Aides and the Board of Issues BDCS:CSA:BofI:BL.RR.JE.MG.m.rd for the Copyright $c 1972, 1975 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS by L. Ron Hubbard of the ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY 124  Training & Services Aide and Dissem Aide by order of L. RON HUBBARD Founder Revised by Msm John Eastment A/CS-5 and Molly Gilliam Flag Mission 1234 2nd Reissued as BPL by Flag Mission 1234 2nd Molly Gilliam Approved by the Commodore's Staff Aides and the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 11 iDate=15/4/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 1R   Remimeo Central Orgs Academies London Washington Los Angeles Johannesburg Denmark Sydney SHs  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 APRIL 1972 Remimeo Central Orgs Academies London Washington (Revised issue of Los Angeles HCOB 31 Mar 72) Johannesburg Denmark Sydney SHs Expanded Dianetics Series 1R EXPANDED DIANETICS is that branch of Dianetics which uses Dianetics in special ways for specific purposes. It is not HSDC Dianetics. Its position on the Grade and Class Chart would be just above Class IV. Its proper number is Class IVA. It uses Dianetics to change an Oxford Capacity Analysis (or an American Personality Analysis) and is run directly against these analysis graphs and the "Science of Survival Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation". EXPANDED DIANETICS IS NOT THE SAME AS STANDARD DIANETICS AS IT REQUIRES SPECIAL TRAINING AND ADVANCED SKILLS. The HSDC is qualified to run Standard Dianetics. He is not authorized to run EXPANDED DIANETICS without special training. DO NOT MIX EXPANDED DIANETICS INTO STANDARD DIANETICS. It often happens that one technology's skills are mingled with another's. The result is that neither then work. Standard Dianetics will go right on producing results. The main difference between these two branches is that Standard Dianetics is very general in application. Expanded Dianetics is very specifically adjusted to the pc. Some pcs, particularly heavy drug cases, or who have been given injurious psychiatric treatment or who are physically disabled or who are chronically ill or who have had trouble running engrams (to name a few) require a specially adapted technology. A very good Dianetic and Class IV auditor (preferably HSDC & Class VI) can be specially trained to run Dianetics against the OCA or the Chart of Human Evaluation and handle other items of great value to a pc. STUDY (Subject to Change) This training would consist of 1. HSDC 2. STANDARD DIANETIC INTERNE HGC OK TO AUDIT 3. Class 0-IV Academy (or Class VI) 4. PRIMARY CORRECTION RD HCOB 30 Mar 72 if Primary RD not done 127 5. Full Word Clearer Rating 6. FESing 7. Expanded Dianetic Tapes and HCOBs 8. Programming 9. C/S Folder Study 10. Active Auditing on the skills taught 11. C/Sing Expanded Dianetics. CERTIFICATE The Certificate would be HUBBARD GRADUATE DIANETIC SPECIALIST. The Certificate Level is just above Class IV. Class IV is required. A Class VI SHSBC may be substituted for Class IV. CHARGES Hours of Expanded Dianetics, because of the skills required, should be at least half again or double as much as Standard Dianetic Auditing or Lower Grade Auditing. The cost of the Course would be the same as the HSDC Course and additional to it plus Interne fees. PREREQUISITE HSDC and Dianetic Interneship minimum with a successful period of Standard Dianetic Auditing as an auditor and is Class IV or VI. Case gain as a Dianetic pc, and all Lower Grades Triple. DEVELOPMENT Neither the Course nor Expanded Dianetic Auditing may be sold by an org unless the org has an Expanded Dianetic Specialist, to be specific, an HGDS. WHEN RELEASED THE COURSE WILL BE TAUGHT IN CENTRAL ORGS (LONDON, WASHINGTON, LOS ANGELES, JOHANNESBURG, DENMARK AND SYDNEY) AND SHs. IT IS THE SPECIAL COURSE THE CONTINENTAL CENTRAL ORG TEACHES. The HCOBs relating to Expanded Dianetics will be released as a part of this series so that orgs will have them when it comes time for them to acquire the tapes and teach this course. In the meanwhile these orgs should be making HSDCs and Class IVs. PERSONS NOT TRAINED ON IT MAY NOT RUN IT OR USE IT REGARDLESS OF CLASS. To repeat, Expanded Dianetics does not replace Standard Dianetics or any other Class and is itself and is used for its own specific purposes on special cases. LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1972 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 128  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 12 iDate=3/4/72 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=1 rDate=6/6/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 2R CLEARING LISTS AND R3-R  Type = 11 iDate=3/4/72 Issue=2 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn Checksheet Ex Dn Specialist  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 3 APRIL 1972R Remimeo Issue I Ex Dn Revised & Reissued 6 June 1974 as BTB Checksheet Ex Dn CANCELS Specialist HCO BULLETIN OF 3 APRIL 1972 Issue II SAME TITLE Expanded Dianetics Series 2R CLEARING LISTS AND R3-R "A great many people can't go into Dianetics at all. They can't run an engram at all. "That is uniformly one of two things: it is drugs, or the commands have not been cleared. "This is very interesting to you, that FAILURE TO CLEAR UP ALL THE WORDS IN THE COMMANDS WITH THE PC, AND THE FAILURE TO CLEAR EVERY ISOLATED DIFFERENT WORD IN THE LIST, INCLUDING THE TINY LITTLE WORDS ('IS', 'THE', 'FROM', 'SUCH'), CAN CAUSE YOU TO GET READS ON THE ITEMS THE PC HIMSELF HAS GIVEN YOU, THAT AREN'T VALID. "Now it is not: Do you know what this word means? You ask: WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF _______? "They can't give it to you? Have your stuff right to hand. Look it up. "Have your metering perfect and all the rest of that, but clear up those words and you'll get the pcs that fail." LRH The following is a list of the words in R3-R Procedure and the L3ExD RB. A basic communication do abandoned be connected drugs about been confused duration accept before continue actions beginning constantly earlier affinity black correct else after by could emotion all by-passed curious emotions an end and can date enforced another causing death engrams are chain demanded erasing ARC Break chains desired exterior assessment changed destructive eyes audited changing Dianetic auditor charge didn't false at close different feel attitude commands distracted field 129 first jumped persistent stuck flat just picture suppressed flow pictures flubbed late place taken F/N later point tell (Floating list pressure than needle) locate prevented that for problem the found mass protest there from me protesting thing medicine things go messed real this going misassessment reality through gone misrun really time got missed reason to misunderstood recall too happened more refused trouble have move repair twice how restimulated two new restimulation implant no run understanding impulse not running up in nothing upset incident same incidents of saying was incorrect off scan went indicated okay see were inhibited on sensation what session when Int R/D or should while interiorization other shouldn't with into others similar withhold invalidated over solid wording invisible overrun something wrong is soon it pain spot you item past stopped your Note that some of these words have several senses, all of which would have to be cleared. "IT ISN'T THE HARD WORDS, IT'S THE STUPID ONES." -- LRH List compiled by Dianetic Specialist Team Based on a lecture by L. Ron Hubbard Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU BDCS:SW:AL:MH:AG:BA:FG:JA:al.rd for the Copyright $c 1972, 1974 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS by L. Ron Hubbard of the ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY 130  List compiled by Dianetic Specialist Team Based on a lecture by L. Ron Hubbard Revised & Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow Authorized by AVU for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 11 iDate=2/4/72 Volnum=0 Issue=2 Rev=3 rDate=17/3/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  IMPORTANT Expanded Dianetics Series 3RB L3ExD RB EXPANDED DIANETICS REPAIR LIST   Remimeo Ex Dn Chkshts  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 2 APRIL 1972RB Issue II (REVISED 17 MARCH 1974) Remimeo Ex Dn Chkshts IMPORTANT Expanded Dianetics Series 3RB L3ExD RB EXPANDED DIANETICS REPAIR LIST This list includes the most frequent Exp Dianetic & R3R errors. A high or low TA and a bogged case can result from failures to erase a chain of incidents. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO REPAIR A CHAIN OR ENGRAM WITHOUT USING THIS LIST as it can have different or several errors. REMEMBER TO CLEAR EACH WORD ON THIS LIST. IF A QUESTION READS AND THE PC SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND IT, CLEAR IT AND REASSESS (don't explain it and take it as it read on a misunderstood not on a fact). RUNNING PCS ON EXP DIANETICS WITHOUT A FULL AND COMPLETE DN C/S 1 INDOCTRINATION IS A FOOLISH ACTION. TAKE ANY READ FOUND TO F/N BY FULL REPAIR OF IT PER THE INSTRUCTIONS. 1. There was an Earlier Similar incident. _______ Indicate it, flatten the chain. 2. There was no Earlier Similar incident. _______ Indicate it. Determine if the chain is flat or if the last incident needs to be run through again. Complete the chain to F/N by indication or D/L if needed, or by flattening it. 3. There was an earlier beginning. _______ Indicate it. Handle with R3R and complete the chain. 4. There was no earlier beginning. _______ Indicate it. Complete the chain with R3R ABCD on last incident if unflat. 5. An F/N was indicated too soon. _______ Indicate it. Flatten the last incident. 6. An F/N was indicated too late. _______ Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary. 7. An F/N was not indicated at all. _______ Indicate it. Spot the flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary. 131 8. There was no charge on an item in the first place. _______ Indicate it, and that it shouldn't have been run, D/L if necessary. 9. Jumped chains. _______ Indicate it. Reorient to the original chain, spot flat point and indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary, or flatten the chain. 10. Flubbed commands. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. 11. Didn't have a command. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. 12. Misunderstood on the command. _______ Find it and clear it. 13. Incident should be run through one more time. _______ Indicate it. ABCD on the incident, flatten the chain. 14. Too late on the chain. _______ Indicate it. Get the Earlier Similar incident and complete the chain with R3R. 14A. Wrong Flow. _______ Indicate it. Run it the way pc feels it should be run. 15. Incident gone more solid. _______ Indicate it. Check for earlier incident or earlier beginning and complete the chain. 16. Stopped running an incident that was erasing. _______ Indicate it. ABCD on the incident and erase it. 17. Went past basic on a chain. _______ Indicate it, D/L if necessary. 18. An earlier misrun incident restimulated. _______ Indicate it. Find out what it was and do an L-3RD on it. 19. Two or more incidents got confused. _______ Indicate it, sort it out with an L-3RD on it. 20. An implant was restimulated. _______ Indicate it, if no joy do an L-3RD on the time of the restimulation. 21. The incident was really an implant. _______ Indicate it, D/L if necessary or L-3RD on it. 22. Wrong Item. _______ Indicate it was a wrong item and that all other actions connected with it were wrong. If it is from an L&N list or if any question or difficulty, L-4BR. 22A. It was really your attitudes to it that should have been run. _______ Indicate it. List the attitudes, R3R triple and exhaust the list. 132 22B. It was really the emotions connected with it that should have been run. _______ Indicate it. List the emotions, R3R triple and exhaust the list. 22C. It was really your intentions that should have been run. _______ Indicate it. List the intentions, R3R triple and exhaust the list. 23. Not your item. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. 24. Not your incident. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L-3RD if any trouble. 25. Same thing run twice. _______ Indicate it. Spot the first flat point, indicate the overrun, D/L if necessary, or run out the session. 26. There was a wrong date. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if unflat. 27. There was no date for the incident. _______ Indicate it. Get the date and flatten the incident if unflat. 28. It was a false date. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct date and flatten the incident if unflat. 29. There was an incorrect duration. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if unflat. 30. No duration was found for the incident. _______ Indicate it. Get the duration and flatten the incident if unflat. 31. There was a false duration. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct duration and flatten the incident if unflat. 32. An earlier Dianetic upset was restimulated. _______ Locate what it was, indicate it. Sort it out with an L-3RD if necessary. 33. An earlier ARC Break on engrams was restimulated. _______ Indicate it. Sort it out with an L-3RD, ARCU CDEINR or an L1C as applicable, or run out the session. 34. There was an ARC Break in the incident. _______ Indicate it. Flatten the incident if unflat. ARCU CDEINR at that time if necessary. 34A. Destructive impulse been missed. _______ Get it. It should BD F/N. If this turns into a listing action complete the list to BD F/N item. 35. You were protesting. _______ Indicate it, clean it up E/S to F/N. 133 36. Auditor demanded more than you could see. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L1C if necessary, or run out the session. 37. Auditor refused to accept what you were saying. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. L1C if necessary, or run out the session. 38. You were prevented from running an incident. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L1C if necessary, or run out the session. 39. You were distracted while running an incident. _______ Indicate it, E/S to F/N. Flatten the incident if unflat. L1C if necessary, or run out the session. 40. Audited over an ARC Brk _______ Problem _______ Withhold _______ Indicate it and handle the out rud. Do not pull W/Hs before the engram or chain is repaired or it will mush engrams. 41. An item was suppressed. _______ Indicate it. Get the suppress off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten the item. 42. An item was invalidated. _______ Indicate it. Get the inval off E/S to F/N, then run or flatten the item. 43. An item was abandoned. _______ Indicate it, get the item back and run or flatten it. 44. The wording of the item was changed. _______ Indicate it. Get the correct wording and give it to him. Flatten it if unflat. 45. Stuck picture. _______ Indicate it. Do an L-3RD on it. You can also unstick it by having him recall a time before it and recall a time after it. D/L if necessary. 46. All black. _______ Spot the black field or picture. Get the correct duration. If no go, L-3RD on it. 47. Invisible. _______ Spot the invisible field or picture. L-3RD on it. 48. Constantly changing pictures. _______ Indicate there was a misassessment and a wrong item was taken off the list. Get the correct item and run it, or L-3RD on that session. 49. There was a persistent mass. _______ L-3RD on it, or D/L. 134 50. There was trouble with a pressure item or pressure on an item. _______ L-3RD on it, or D/L. 51. You went exterior. _______ Indicate it, D/L if necessary or rehab. If TA high as a result of this do an Int RD Correction List or send to the C/S if pc hasn't had Int RD. 52. Your Int RD was messed up. _______ Indicate it, Int RD Corr List if TA high. If TA OK, 2wc "going into things" or clear up any misunderstoods on Int, Ext, etc. 53. Audited over Drugs or Medicine. _______ Indicate it. L-3RD on that time, then verify all chains to ensure they erased. 54. A past death restimulated. _______ Indicate it, if it doesn't blow run it out. 55. There was nothing wrong in the first place. _______ Indicate it. Continue the action you were on. 56. The real reason was missed. _______ Indicate it. Locate the real reason and handle or do a GF. 57. Something else wrong. _______ Locate what it is and sort it out or do a GF M5 and handle. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ntm.jh Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 135  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=20/4/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 4 SUPPRESSED PCS AND PTS TECH   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1972 Remimeo Expanded Dianetics Series 4 (Adds C/S Series 76 to HGDS checksheet) SUPPRESSED PCS AND PTS TECH (PTS means Potential Trouble Source which itself means a person connected to a Suppressive Person.) As the Dianetic Specialist (HGDS) is often called upon to handle pcs who are not well, it is vital that he knows all about and can use "PTS Tech". All sick persons are PTS. All pcs who rollercoaster (regularly lose gains) are PTS. Suppressive persons are themselves PTS to themselves. If a Dianetic Specialist does not know this, have reality upon it and use it, he will have loses on pcs he need not have. There is considerable Administrative Tech connected with this subject of PTS and there is a special Rundown which handles PTS people. They get handled if the auditor knows his PTS tech, if he audits well and if he uses both the auditing and Administrative Tech to handle. The Administrative Tech requires an interview, usually by the Director of Processing or Ethics Officer and the person is required to handle the PTS situation itself before being audited. A check for stability is also made after being audited on the PTS Rundown. For this reason, HCO B 17 April 72 and all the checksheet of HCO P/L 31 May 71 must be fully known to the Dianetic Specialist. HCO B 17 April 72 is also C/S Series 76 so as to be sure that Case Supervisors handle the Admin and C/Sing correctly. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:mes.rd Copyright $c 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 136  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=24/4/72 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  C/S Series 79 Expanded Dianetics Series 5 PTS INTERVIEWS   Remimeo D of P Auditors PTS Pack Ethics Officers  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 24 APRIL 1972 Remimeo Issue I D of P Auditors C/S Series 79 PTS Pack Ethics Expanded Dianetics Series 5 Officers PTS INTERVIEWS (Reference HCO B 17 April 72, C/S Series 76) Interviews to discover a PTS condition are done on a meter with all reads marked. The Interview asks (a) about persons who are hostile or antagonistic to the pc, (b) about groups that are anti-Scientology, (c) about people who have harmed the pc, (d) about things that the pc thinks are suppressive to the pc, (e) about locations that are suppressive to the pc and about past life things and beings suppressive to the pc. In doing the Interview the Interviewer must realize that a sick person is PTS. There are no sick people who are not PTS to someone or a group or something somewhere. A somewhat suppressive pc will find the good hats suppressive. This does not relieve his condition. He is PTS to SP people, groups, things or locations, no matter how SP he is. He can have been audited by someone he knew in an earlier life and who goofed the session. A few auditors have since been declared. Not because they goofed but because they were SP. However, some PTS pc will make trouble for good people because that is what PTS means (Potential Trouble Source). So do not buy all the good people he is PTS to. Further, when you do get the person or group or thing or location the PTS person will F/N VGI and begin to get well. The PTS condition is actually a problem and a mystery and a withdrawal so it is sometimes hard to find and has to be specially processed (3 S&Ds) to locate it. Usually it is quite visible. Don't have a sick, rollercoaster pc appear for Interview and then say "not PTS". It's a false report. It only means the Interviewer did not find it. The pc sometimes begins to list in such an Interview and such an Interview where a wrong item is found has to be audited to complete the list or find the right item. (See C/S Series 78, HCO B 20 Apr 72, Issue II.) So Interview worksheets are VITAL. The Interview should end on an F/N. The Interview is followed by the Ethics action of HCO PL 5 April 72 or other Ethics actions such as handling or disconnection and posting as called for in policy. An Interviewer has to use good TRs and operate his meter properly and know 2-way comm and PTS tech. Some Interviewers are extremely successful. Such Interviews and handling count as auditing hours. When properly done, plus good auditing on the PTS RD, well people result. LRH:mes.rd Copyright $c 1972 by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder 137  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=10/8/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 6 C/S Series 82 DIANETIC HCO B INTEREST   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1972 (Amended & Reissued 28 March 1974 -only change is Series No.) Remimeo Expanded Dianetics Series 6 C/S Series 82 DIANETIC HCO B INTEREST On two certain subjects the "Interest?" question is omitted from Dianetic R3R patter. On drugs and when running Evil Purposes or Intentions one does NOT ask the pc if he is interested in running the item. The requirement on both drug items and intentions is that the item read on the meter (suppress and inval can be used) and has not been run by R3R previously. Many pcs, it has now been found, have replied "No, no interest" on a drug item, the item has not been run and the pc then continued to have trouble with drugs. Checking back pcs who returned to drugs after auditing showed "drug rundowns" that were so brief as to be nothing. One pc who had been on LSD for years had only a 1 hour quickie drug rundown. Later this person relapsed. Tracing this, in each case the "Interest?" question had been used and the pc had replied "No interest" BUT MEANT "I'M NO LONGER INTERESTED IN DRUGS." So Drug items that have read are run R3R without asking for interest. The command is simply omitted. In Expanded Dianetics the same thing has occurred in running Evil Purposes or Intentions. The Auditor asked the pc if he was interested in running the item and the pc said "No" and so it went untouched. But the pc had it confused with interest in doing the purpose and missed running it and then fell on his head later. Tracing the case back it was found that R/Ses and such had not been run due to the pc saying "No Interest". Nothing bad will happen if the item is run. C/S RESPONSIBILITY The C/S must keep telling his auditors, on drugs or Expanded Dianetics, "Omit asking for interest on R3R on these (drug) (intentions). Run them if they read on the meter." REPAIR In repairing cases it is good sense to check this point on drugs and intentions to see if they were neglected in R3R due to "no interest". If so, then have them run and the case will suddenly do well. LRH:nt.ntm.jh L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1972, 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 138  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=13/9/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  DIANETICS Expanded Dianetics Series 7 C/S Series 85 CATASTROPHES FROM AND REPAIR OF "NO INTEREST" ITEMS   Remimeo All Dn & Ex Dn Auditors Class VIII C/Ses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 13 SEPTEMBER 1972 (Amended & Reissued 28 March 1974 -- only change is Series No.) Remimeo All Dn & Ex Dn Auditors DIANETICS Class VIII C/Ses Expanded Dianetics Series 7 C/S Series 85 CATASTROPHES FROM AND REPAIR OF "NO INTEREST" ITEMS I have done a review of several failed cases which blew or went bad after auditing. THE COMMON FACTOR IN EVERY ONE WAS CASE BY-PASSED DUE TO "NO INTEREST". The auditor finds a reading drug item or an evil purpose and proposes to run R3R on it. The auditor asks if the pc is interested in running it. The pc says, "No." The auditor does not run it. BANG, we have a BY-PASSED CASE. The pc will blow or go sour or not recover. One of these cases was unchanged after "a drug rundown". He had a pair of eyes that looked like blank discs. Check of folder showed all major drug items "not run due to no interest". The solution was to recover the lists, run the items that had read R3R Triple and complete the case. Another one blew. His folder was examined. Every evil purpose had been left unrun! Of the items from the "Wants Handled Rundown" the intentions were mislisted. The drug rundown failed due to "no interest". Each flubbed case I am finding has had his drug items and evil purposes left unrun on R3R due to "no interest". So DON'T ASK FOR INTEREST ON INTENTIONS, EVIL PURPOSES AND DRUG ITEMS. IF THEY READ, RUN THEM! REPAIR 1. On any stumbling case that has had a "drug rundown" or Expanded Dianetics get the Folder FESed to see if reading items were left unrun on R3R Triple. List them chronologically, early to late. 2. Get the case back, with an R factor of "Incomplete". 3. Run every one of those unrun drug items, intentions and Evil Purposes. 4. If the items don't now read, then get in Suppress and Invalidate on them. 5. If the case bogs do L3RD Method 5 and Handle on that chain only. 6. Go on with the action and complete it. LRH:sb.ntm.jh Copyright$c 1972, 1974 L. RON HUBBARD by L. Ron Hubbard Founder ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 139  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 12 iDate=30/8/72 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 8 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE A  Type = 11 iDate=30/8/72 Issue=2 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 30 AUGUST 1972 Issue I Issued 28 March 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses CANCELS Ex Dn HCO BULLETIN OF 30 AUGUST 1972 Auditors Issue II Expanded Dianetics Series 8 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE A [GRAPHICS INSERTED] GRAPH - Out of valence and crazy. CASE NOTES -- TA High, Quickie W/C 1, shallow Dianetics, has been scared in auditing, and body overweight. Grade IV. EXP DN PROGRAM by Dn Specialist. 1. C/S 53 clean and handle. 2. W/Clear M1, C/S 1, WCCL. 3. Handle WCCL. 4. M1 verified or completed; add: auditing, commands, sessions. 5. W/Clear L3ExD and R3R. 6. Assess PT environment buttons and list Attitudes, Emotions on reading items, R3R Triple. 7. Assess Class VIII auditing list, on reading items AE R3R Triple. 8. W/Form -- stress losses, R3R Triple. 9. LXs R3R Triple. 10. OCA. LRH "OK". THE PROGRAM IS STARTED 14.4.72. The C/S 53 goes OK but not F/Ning. Pc has sore back, hard to get comfortable. Pc tends to have high TA at start of session but goes down right away. LRH -- "It's probably as simple as she doesn't at first grip the cans. Look it over." 140 C/S BY AUDITOR -- "0. Check can handling of pc." -- LRH 1. Touch Assist. 2. Fly all Ruds. 3. Reassess C/8 53 to F/N list. 4. Continue program. "5. Havingness." -- LRH Only the touch assist is given. TA is high at exams. Auditor C/Ses for a C/S 53. LRH -- "The C/S will probably handle. Could be PTS Roller Coaster." NEXT SESSION AUDITOR COMMENT -- When pc back on cans from any break TA is up, but immediately blows down. LRH -- "Probably cans dry or something, could be mass that moves. Not important." AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Cont M1 W/C to F/N list. 2. Hav. Session goes fine. AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- She's doing well. There's a bit of pain in back. I had her hold the cans to exams. So she had them in contact after session. And there was no TA trip. TA was 2.75 F/N and no big BD. LRH -- "Very Well Done. Good on cans. Back pn requires a very extensive touch assist using both sides of spine and also body extremities and head. (Toe, back, hands, back, head, back, toes, etc, each one several and on both sides.) Your C/S is Okay. Get as a completion a cured person." AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Touch Assist. 2. Hav. 3. Cont M1 to F/N list. Touch Assist only done next session. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- Touch Assist fine. No F/N at exams so I took her back and really finished her, to nice cog, pn gone, and F/N VGIS. LRH -- "Very Well Done. Good to see an auditor auditing the pc." Pc continues M1. On the subject AUDITING pc goes E/S to CONSULTATION and Rock Slams. LRH -- "Very Well Done -- note R/S on Pgm." 8RR clean but not F/Ning. Next session WCCL clean even with supp but not F/Ning. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- Something wrong here -- no pn at all in back today. (TA normal range 2.7.) 141 LRH -- "Well Done. No EP as you say. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Assess C/S 53. 3. Handle. When you assess it, 2wc the earliest read and so on down the list so you find out what's up. If Int, lists or Ruds read, Int Ext Corr List, L4B or Ruds will have to be handled." WCCL and 8RR F/N. A NEW PROGRAM IS WRITTEN -- this in accordance with Exp Dn Tape 3 where the actual Exp Dn auditing is programmed as a separate grade and written on a blue sheet. Intentions are added because the pc R/Sed. LRH -- "A pc doesn't have to R/S to have intentions added." AUDITOR'S PROGRAM -- a. Touch Assist if needed each session. b. Hav at end of each session. 1. Attest current M1 comp. 2. 2wc PT Environment. Note BDs and reads. E.A.I. on items reading. R3R Triple. 3. Assess C1 VIII auditing list E.A.I. R3R Triple. 4. WF -- stress Emotional Stresses and Losses. R3R Triple. 5. LXs. R3R Triple. *6. Sanderson RD (was added later). 7. OCA. LRH "OK". Pc was sent to the hospital for X-Ray on back by MO. LRH -- "One set of X-Rays wasted. You'll get a product here soon." Pc runs very well for several sessions. At end of session on PT Environment Buttons pc says -- "One problem with sessions, face gets tired (smiling so much) haven't felt as good as this in a long time," F/N VGI. AUDITOR INSTRUCTIONS -- May Declare. 1. Have you any doubts or reservations that you have attained the ability to handle your PT Environment? 2. Would you like to attest PT Environment handling complete? Pc does with VGIs. LRH -- "Very Well Done." A few sessions later the auditor is 2wcing at the start of a session and picks up an ARC Break. There is no F/N so goes to GF and F/Ns on M/W/H. (Does not complete the ARC Break chain.) *FOOTNOTE: The "Wants Handled RD" as outlined in Expanded Dianetics Series 21, HCO B 28 March 1974, was originally called the "Sanderson RD" on Flag. (TEAM C/S.) 142 LRH -- "Well Done." LRH adds to the C/S: "0. Repair ARC Break of last session. O/R?, Not there? Handle and F/N." Running LX lists, pc after session does not F/N, TA 3.6 clean. Auditor takes her back and does a C/S 53. "Have you committed any Overts", "False TA" and "Not Saying" read. Auditor exhausts possibility of False TA and then takes up Overt. VGIs at session end but TA 3.2. Dial F/N at exams. Auditor says pc tired. LRH -- "Well Done by Exams. Please don't run on wrong whys. She wasn't tired, AND we always end a session on an F/N. The reason it took so long is you kept saying 'Supp' 'Inval' WHEREAS GROUP C says E/S to F/N. Study the C/Ses you do, particularly C/S 53RRR. You have now left earlier charge unhandled and next session she may natter at you. She comes up with an 'I stole a pin from HASI' sort of patty cake, you buy it, no E/S and no F/N." LRH C/S -- " 1. R-Factor. On the overt chain we were running, there was no F/N. I want to check s'thing. Something you didn't do? _______ (note read) Something you did do? _______ Something someone else did? _______ Take what read and say, 'It was something _______' (whatever read). Now what was it? Get what it is by steering if necessary then when she says it, if no F/N, go earlier similar. If no joy, take the other read (on C/S 53) and say, 'There's something you're not saying. What is it?' Get it. F/N or E/S F/N. If still no joy ask her, 'Well did you murder somebody?' 'Did you rob a bank?' 'Did you forget something that burned the house down?' Get the overt! 2. If 'Not Saying' was not used then ask, 'What is it you're not saying?' If it was used above say, 'Is there something you're not saying to me or others?' E/S to F/N it." LRH -- "It isn't that you didn't use E/S you just didn't get an overt first. The stuff you bought was drivel. You don't run overts like a phonograph record, you get the overt." Auditor uses 1. fully and gets the overt. Pc R/Ses on "going into action". On Murder Technique the pc says, "There was a fire in store room. I put stuff next to heater. Don't consider it an overt." LRH -- "Very Well Done. You did it. That's the old Murder Routine. The mechanism is 'worse than'. This routine is just one version of it. Joburg 1960, earlier DC, it was 'Tell me something worse than (the body condition)' repetitive bypassing all F/Ns will cure a cripple. This pc (what she considers an overt) has several Evil Intentions (R/Ses) and will need the Wants Handled RD. Letting ships on fire is NOT an overt to her! Sex is so evident. Psychoanalytical background. Session is classic." 143 A few days later pc assigned a personal condition of Danger. AUDITOR -- Suggests L1C Recently to handle. LRH -- "Ethics. Don't audit pcs in Ethics, this isn't right Tech." LRH -- "Pc in Ethics trouble. We got to her too late and some senior is across lines. (If they'd waited a day she wd have made it.) You don't audit a pc in Ethics trouble unless you do a 3rd May 72 P/L on her with L&N. Off auditing until out of Ethics. That's by the book." MAA -- Next day pc has 1 hr 20 min PTS Check by MAA. PC -- Next day pc is upgraded to Emergency. Auditor asks if OK to continue program. LRH -- "PTS terminals found very extensive for a PTS Check. PTS RD must now be completed." LRH C/S -- "1. Fly all ruds Triple. 2. Using terminals from interview and any other do PTS RD per HCO Bs. 3. Run Can't Have on those already R3Red. You R3R Triple the terminals first." Later in the PTS RD the auditor 2wc to F/N and starts F1 R3R on a terminal. It bogs. Auditor goes to L3B but TA remains high and does not resolve. Auditor suggests C/S 53RC and handle. LRH -- "Some oddball error here you didn't catch. This is plain Dn repair." LRH C/S -- "1. Assess M5 (a) By-passed an F/N _______ (b) Chain flattened half way thro' 1st incident run _______ (c) Jumped into a new set of pictures _______ (d) Item wasn't reading in the first place _______ (e) Item already blown _______ Handle. 2. Handle reads on L3B to F/N. 3. Continue PTS RD." PTS RD and Hav steps completed. Pc declares. Pc has high TA at Success. High TA a bother. LRH -- "Use Hi-Lo -- you handle a High TA case all ways you can." TA still high so auditor does C/S 53RC. Int reads so does Int Corr List. "You ran went out" reads sF. Auditor runs Int as far as Sec F1 and it bogs. LRH -- "Hey I never told you to run Int! That wasn't the C/S or any part of it. She ran leaving and have to stay and I'm sure you've run Int the second time." 144 LRH C/S -- "1. Was the Int RD done before? Spot exact place it was flat. Date to blow. Locate to blow. If you can't do this give to an auditor who can and take her back. 2. C/S 53RC. Handle to F/Ning list. 3. L3ExD general to F/N list. Don't restim her further! Don't miss any F/Ns." AUDITOR -- finishes LX3, LX2, LX1 items and Sanderson RD. GRAPH when pc complete 12.6.72. [GRAPHICS INSERTED] Pc attests to Exp Dn complete. New OCA is up. She is 60 pounds lighter. Total No. of sessions 48. Total hrs in chair 91 hrs 51 min. Compiled by: Ex Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.jh Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 145  Compiled by: Ex Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=30/8/72 Volnum=0 Issue=2 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 9 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE B  Type = 11 iDate=30/8/72 Issue=3 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 30 AUGUST 1972 Issue II Remimeo Issued 28 March 1974 Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 30 AUGUST 1972 Issue III Expanded Dianetics Series 9 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE B (Note: This case was made well, but not sane. This is a research case and is one of the subjects of HCO B 13 Sept 72. It is included to show how a case can become physically well, yet be by-passed.) [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES - Chronic illness, glib auditing history, had upper level auditing over very unflat Dn. Won't run Dn as "Nothing there". Tone 1.1. Professed Grade OT III but actually not complete on lowest grade Dianetics. EXP DN PROGRAM by Dn Specialist. Steps added by LRH. 1.4.72. 0. "Clear all words on a WC C/S 1 & WC Corr List." LRH. 1. Verify or complete Method 1 WC. Add: Processing, Tech, Commands, Study. 2. Clear all Dn definitions. Clear all R3R words. Clear L3B. 3a. 2wc PT Environment. Note all LF, BD items. Make a list of these. b. Assess attitudes, emotions on best read from a. c. List from best read of b. and exhaust. d. Repeat b. and c. until item F/Ns. e. Handle all items per b. c. d. and reassess to F/Ning list. 146 4a. Assess for best read. Auditors, auditing, etc. Add pictures, R3R. b. Assess emotions, attitudes, sensations, on best reading from a. c. List from b. best read and exhaust, R3R Triple. d. Repeat b. and c. till item F/Ns. e. Reassess a., do b. c. d. e. till whole list F/Ns. NOTE: If nothing comes up on 3 and 4 assess LX3, 2, 1, in b. of each. 5a. White Form. Get all emotional stress incidents. b. R3R Narr Triple all from a. c. Handle attitudes to treatment, if reads well, by listing treatments, SEAs, to F/Ning list. d. Handle attitudes to illness, if reads as in c. 6. LX3, 2, 1 general. 7. New OCA. On 8.4.72 LRH added "Hav before and after body of session." PROGRAM STARTED 1.4.72. The pc clears lots of words. AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- Pc started a little gripey about clearing words, but became interested when he discovered there were some he didn't know! LRH -- "Very Well Done. Out WC M1 probably helped cause his illness. Ethics action was indicated here; WC M1 declared prior to 21.9.71 but you found the list hot. Some WCer couldn't WC. We will let it go; this was excellent." Next session auditor does clearing of R3R and starts Env buttons. Next session auditor finishes Env buttons. On the Class VIII C/S 6 assessment list it F/Ns and pc says, "No nothing on that." AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- He's up out of fear into covert hostility -- very smug and joke-cracking in session. Slightly snide. Hands no longer sweaty. LRH -- "Very well done." AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Fly a rud. 2. Per program note. LX3, LX2, LX1 "while being audited" (omit those items already run). 3. Continue Pgm. Next session pc does not seem to be interested in anything. Auditor checks "No Interest in the first place?" Pc says, "No, none at all. Actually no real interest in running Exp Dns. I'm not saying it's not going to work, but so far it hasn't got anywhere near what I want handled." LF. 147 AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- Pc's in-session mannerism is a slightly covert amusement, deprecating attitude. Very interestingly this "Nothing there" is a recurrent pattern from his very first auditing. Had a lot of trouble on his XII Rundowns with the same thing. Good TA on those attitudes we have run. I feel this needs an undercut but don't know what to suggest. LRH -- "Well done. But hey! Do you see the hidden standard on page 6 of your W/S. Now this is not beyond Exp Dn. It's great. It tells you a fixated interest. (He's also plenty out ethics by W/S comments.)" LRH C/S -- "1. 2wc MARK ALL READS AND BDs. Get it to F/N. 'What do you really want handled?' 2. Get the best read out of all this. It will be an item or attitude or emotion or some such thing. Probably a condition. Express it the way he says it and be sure that's what it is & the way he says it. 3. Put it into R3R chain of when he had or did it. Then chain of another had or did it. Then chain of others had or did it. If it's a doingness like a habit, it's a did it. If it's a condition like an emotion or attitude it's a had it." Next session the pc answers 2wc with "To get rid of these somatics" F. "started as headache" LFsBD. "My knees hurt" LF. Auditor runs "The somatics" R3R Triple. AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Fly a rud if no F/N. 1a. Assess "getting the somatic handled", "The somatics". 2. Assess SEA connected with best read. 3. List from big read, exhaust, etc. LRH -- "Very very well done! This one needs hav before and after. You chose the wrong next somatic. He F/Ned on 'The pain'. List is 'The pain' 'Headache' 'Knees hurt'. If you run 'The somatics' again you'd double run." LRH C/S -- "1. Can squeeze. Find a hav. Get an F/N. 2. Check with him if it's handled. If not ask, 'What remains to be handled?' 3. If he gives you anything add it to list, get best read and check interest and best read R3R Triple. 4. If he says all handled, then go to W/F (5a. of Pgm). Just assess. 5. Havingness." Admin Note: (LRH) "If you use a list in session leave it in folder. I had to find one to get what it was." Next session pc says handled so auditor assesses W/F. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- Strong pc interest in havingness. R/Ses pages 2, 3. A1, A5 of White Form, yet! Also 4 of program isn't actually complete. 148 LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Hey look at that! Note any Evil Purp he comes up with. Don't try to handle. But get it on edge of Pgm. AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Hav to F/N. 2. Each rud triple including overts. Hav to F/N between each set. (3 way ARC X, Hav, 3 way PTP, Hav, etc.) 3. Assess LX2 "While being audited" and handle (omit "Shame" and "Boredom"). 3a. Hav. 4. Assess LX1 as in 3 and handle. 5. Hav to F/N. 6. Recheck interest in LX3 reads from 6.4.72-session. Handle. 7. Hav to F/N. 8. Check interest in "No feelings" R3R Triple. 9. Assess attitudes, emotions to illness, list and handle R3R Triple. 10. If nothing runnable out of the above, do a touch assist to 1st EP. (Added to program as 5e.) Next session pc has no interest in LX items. A touch assist was given. Pc goes to the examiner after and says, "The same thing happened today as yesterday. Headache intensified as day went on. It's pretty bad now. That's all." 2.6-2.2 falling and clean, Med GIs. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- H. Std. remains. R/S on "contemptuous" on LX2. R/S on "unemotional". LRH COMMENT -- "Well he hasn't made his hidden standard yet. Headaches are rough to run. Usually (from 1968 Tech) they are taken apart by finding what PSEA is connected with the headache and run that. Headache is after the fact of being hit in the head. There's a lot on this in earlier Dn. He gave it to you and you ran it narrative. Well okay. If you recall the earlier materials however, it says a headache is after the fact of an injury so is not the beginning of the incident. Headache and this chain you ran all had E/B! You should realize that. So now we know (though no real fault) that this pc: 1. R/Ses = Psychosis equals succumb. 2. A headache is usually after the engram of injury. Leaves an E/B. 3. That aches are taken apart for PSEA. 4. That the case is slightly misprogrammed and needs INTENTIONS not attitudes as the attitudes are after the fact of an evil purpose in a psycho case. 149 So we repair this failed chain headaches. We get the intentions in the head by an L&N list or we look up old Ev Purps run (were wrong or he wouldn't R/S still). We reprogram for intentions, not attitudes for reason of the R/S = Intention very strong to die. So pc won't get well until Intentions handled. BEWARE OF A WRONG LIST. An R/S pc is trying to die (evil purpose) and the auditor is trying to make him live. This gives you an intention counter-intention = problem, so all such pcs are problems to audit. See C/S Series 22, 28 Nov 70, 'Psychosis'. So change the program to include Intentions as a type of attitude. Headache is common with out-Int. We have to know before we go." LRH C/S -- "1. Assess A. This headache is because of a misrun went-in chain _______ B. This headache is after some injury _______ C. This headache comes from an intention _______ 2. We handle the best read. Use A. = Int Ext Corr List. B. = List somatics of injury. C. = List Intentions to a BD/F/N Item and R3R it." Next session pc reads on "This headache comes from an intention". The Item from the L&N step is "An intention to exteriorize". This is run 3 flows R3R. AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- Your C/S done. Pc really with session, very interested, truly amazing change. Proposed program written per your instructions. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. (Brings in my VGIs. That was a slippery one and very well executed.) Mark the goal on the Pgm to D&L later." AUDITOR'S NEW PROGRAM -- 1. LRH C/S 13.4.72 (above). 2. Complete handling of H. Std. (Headache). 3a. Assess: Work, Post, Flag, The Sea Org, Marriage, The Ship. b. List intentions connected with best read. R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 4a. List intentions connected with Auditors, Auditing, etc, buttons and R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 150 b. List "What intentions have you had in auditing". Exhaust R3R Triple. 5a. Assess: Win, Victory, Achievements, Gains, Conquest, Triumph, Success, Mastery. b. List intentions "that enable him to........" and exhaust by R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 6a. Assess SEA, Your Intentions, Another's Intentions, Others' Intentions Towards Others, "Your intentions for........" on the following: Self, sex, family, children, groups, nations, mankind, the White Race, other races, plants, animals, birds, fish, growing things, energy, matter, possessions, planets, stars, galaxies, thetans, spirits, art, music, God, Infinity. b. List intentions by best read and exhaust R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 7. Attitudes from Expanded Gita, clear, assess, and run R3R Triple. 8. 2wc "Gains from recent auditing". 9. OCA. AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Hav to F/N. 2. Assess: The head, the body, gains, expansion, going OT. 3. List from best read and exhaust R3R Triple. 4. When H. Std. gone, go to step 3 of Pgm of 13.4.72. Next session auditor did the above C/S and also a "Danger Assessment" ordered on all crew as part of a Danger Condition Program. On this assessment on the question "Are you doing something harmful" the pc says, "Holding on to whatever is making me ill." AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- TA Moving. Lively pc interest! Hot item on page 3 of Danger Condition Assessment. LRH -- "Very well done." AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Test out current Hav process of pc. If no longer increasing can squeeze, find a new one. 2. Hav to F/N. *3. List to BD F/N item "What intention would make you hold on to whatever is making you ill?" R3R Triple on item. 4. If not now handled, do L3ExD on the area M5 1-80 to F/Ning list. 5. If not now handled, 2wc "What he wasn't able to do because of it". *FOOTNOTE: This is a borderline L&N question as it lists a significance (intention) with a significance. This is explained in HCO B 28 Mar 74, Exp Dn Series 21. (TEAM C/S.) 151 List all LF, BD items and R3R Triple times he was made to....., times he made another....., etc. 6. If not now handled, 2wc "What it got him out of doing". Handle as in 5. 7. If not now handled, 2wc "What it would cost to lose it", R3R Triple "Times he lost a.....", on all LF, BD items. 8. When H. Std. blown go to 3 of 13.4.72 Pgm and handle. Next session on 3 of the C/S pc's item on the Intention list is "To not get too powerful so I can't do too much". The pc on flow 2 R3R says, "It's blown" and when after F3 the auditor asks if the thing handled, pc cognites, "I just realized where the last of what is left is just me looking to see if it's gone!" Wide F/N VGIs. The auditor leaves C/S steps 3-7 and continues the new Pgm at step 3. AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- We blew the H. Std.!! When we got on to the "Win, conquest" area, pc started R/Sing, and got protesty. TA froze and then rose, so just destimmed it and got out. Looks very good otherwise. He sure didn't want to know about area. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. It was too heavy. Be alert now for out lists or out Int. (Ext Int may be out.)" Next session on step 6 of the Pgm while auditor is writing list the pc itsas about how it shouldn't be called Dianetics and how great it is, the TA drops to 1.6. The auditor 2wc "Inval". This raises the TA to 1.8 but instead of continuing the 2wc the auditor changes to Hav process. Later pc talking about Ext. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done by Exams. You should have continued the 2wc until the TA came up. Don't chop a TA off low. This has not F/Ned on the 2wc. The low TA goes low when the person feels overwhelmed. An Out TR can do it. Usually it comes right on back up. You should have carried it on until it did. Don't spook on a low TA and don't end one off, anymore than you would a higher TA. Like on 2wc the pc's TA goes to 3.2, so you don't stop. You F/N it. C/S is OK." AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Clear and assess Int Corr List and handle. 2. Continue Pgm. Next session nothing is handled on Int Corr List and auditor continues Pgm. Pc red-tabs at Exams. Auditor takes pc back in and handles with an L1C that leads to an L4B. 11 -- "Have you thought of items that you did not put on the list" reads and auditor takes it up. The item "To put force into the body" LFBDs and F/Ns. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- (17.4.72) "Daring auditor rides wall of death to bring home bacon" (N. Y. Times 18.4.72). Pc has a new H. Std. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done, C/S very OK." 152 AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Hav to F/N. 2. R3R Triple (if interest) the purpose "To put force into the body". 3. Assess: "You are prevented from exteriorizing because of: a. A misrun went-in chain. b. An intention. c. An opposing intention. d. Times it was dangerous to leave. e. Times it was dangerous to go out." 4. Handle a. With an Int Corr List. b. By listing "What intention would prevent you from exteriorizing?" to BD F/N item. R3R Triple. *c. By listing "What intention would oppose 'an intention to exteriorize'," (previous item pc gave) to BD F/N item. R3R Triple. d. e. R3R Triple. Handle a. first if reading, then by biggest read. 5. If H. Std. not blown, assess C1 VIII C/S list of "Exteriorization, death, leaving, etc". Triple assess for SEAs and exhaust. Next session "To put force into the body" is R3Red 3 flows to EP. On the assessment "Times it was dangerous to go out" gave a F, and was R3Red 3 flows narrative. "An opposing intention" (gave a sF and was listed to an LFBD item). "An intention to interiorize." This was R3Red 3 flows to a big EP. A later 2wc finished the pc off. AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- A product!!! AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Exams: Attest Exp Dn illness handling. ("Is your chronic illness now gone?") LRH COMMENT -- "Hurrah! Very well done!" MED REPORT -- Off MO lines, totally cool and well. PC'S SUCCESS STORY -- Is my chronic illness handled? It is indeed. I've had it going more aeons than I can easily remember. And now it's gone. No more, finished. Handled. And it feels great. Thanks to my auditor for the application. Thanks to the Commodore for the Tech. *FOOTNOTE: Listing an "Intention" opposing an "Intention" does violate HCO B Exp Dn Series 21. In another folder LRH says, "You are really only correctly Exp Dn if you run Intentions on TERMINALS." In this case the auditor got away with it but in the long run it tends to restim the bank and can spin a pc. (TEAM C/S.) 153 GRAPH WHEN PC COMPLETE. 18.4.72. [GRAPHICS INSERTED] Total No. of sessions 14. Total hours in chair 25 hrs 35 min. LRH Final Note: Hidden behind all the effort to get the case moving was a completely untouched Drug Rundown. Since then the "No Interest" way of bypassing a case has been discovered, in part because of this case. This pc was well when completed but not sane and he later blew. The "no interest" he kept putting out on items defeated a full recovery. A great many evil purposes were left unrun, the listing questions (listing a significance from a significance) and failure to R3R drugs, by-passed the basic case. He got well, he didn't become sane. To repair and attain full recovery all "no interest" items would have to be run now. CASE WAS SIMPLY INCOMPLETE. LRH. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:MM:WS:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 154  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=18/9/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 10 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE C  Type = 11 iDate=18/9/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 18 SEPTEMBER 1972 Issued 28 March 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses CANCELS Ex Dn Auditors HCO BULLETIN OF 18 SEPTEMBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 10 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE C [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES -- Had upper level Flag auditing, has attested OT III. Also has had PTS RD. Pc currently ill in bed. Has to be set up for Exp Dn. Get him out of bed and then handle misunderstood words. EXPANDED DIANETIC SET-UP PROGRAM by Dn Specialist. Step added by LRH. 0. Touch Assist to F/N, daily until MO okays to get up. "0a. HCO PL 9 April 72, Ethics Danger Assessment." LRH. 0b. Hav before and after each session. 1. When up -- Clear all words in rudiments questions and WCCL (What is the definition of.....?). 2. Assess WCCL and handle to F/N list. *3. Clear all words on 8RR (M1 list). 4. Assess and handle M1 to F/Ning list. "4a. PTS Check" added by LRH on 19.4.72. 5. To Exp Dn Program. PROGRAM is started. Touch assists are given for five days and then the Ethics PL (Danger Assessment). Pc gets back on post with VVGIs. *FOOTNOTE: This action is now out-tech as designated by HCO B 30 June 1971 (Revised 11 May 72), Word clearing Series 8RB. 155 Step 1 of Pgm started 19.4.72, clearing words incomplete, F/N at exams. AUDITOR'S C/S -- 0. Hav to F/N. 1. Finish clearing words on WCCL. 2. Continue Pgm. 3. End on Hav. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. This case roller-coastering like mad, note 4a on Pgm." Auditor continues program, pc declares M1 verification. MO REPORT -- Pc's temperature is staying low 35.8 (37 normal). PTS Check done by D of P. D of P says, "He is not PTS Type A or Type 1." LRH COMMENT on D of P Interview -- "Not accepted. Interview not okay. Merely failed to find it. Redo interview. He's been sick, incapable and is terrified of past crimes on track. He says he's broken off with everybody. D of P's cue should have been to query just this. He has not formally disconnected by the book. Just went into hiding. Find out who amongst all these was antagonistic or, in any event, find the SP group, person or thing. For instance, even my slight data on him shows him PTS to the U.S. Navy." D of P redoes interview. Finds terminal. LRH -- "Excellent and thank you." EXPANDED DIANETIC PROGRAM written as further set-up to finish up his PTS RD on 6.5.72 by Dn Spec. PTS Disconnect written. Has had PTS RD Jan 72. D of P interview Apr 72 has uncovered new terminal on the case. 1. 2wc "Attention on" to F/N. 2. R3R Triple and Ruds and Overts on terminal if known before this life. 3. PTS Correction List to F/Ning list. 4. Attest and program for Exp Dn. Program started. Terminal not known before this life so not run. Auditor assesses PTS Corr List and handles. On question 10 "It can't be handled anyway" pc says, "Has to do with exterior bit we went through before. I get down tone every now and then. I want to be exterior with full perception." AUDITOR'S C/S AND COMMENT -- Doing okay. List has not F/Ned -- may have attention on something. 156 He has a Hidden Standard of long duration on going Ext with full perception since he was a child. 1. Fly each rud. 2. R-Factor "We need to take the PTS Corr List to an F/Ning List." 3. Assess and handle the F/Ning list. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done. You don't fly ruds over an out list. Int -- Lists -- Ruds is the only handling sequence there is. Don't alter sequence. Use suppress and inval on the list and if any trouble do an L4B. C/S otherwise okay. (LRH scores out 1 of Auditor's C/S.)" The next session the auditor continues with the PTS Correction List. Pc says, "I'm not a PTS -- feel blowy occasionally and worthless." AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- He now needs PTS interview. He's not any easy Type A. He hasn't spotted himself as a PTS but he feels "worthless" and "blowy" and has just recovered from sickness. MAA does another PTS Interview. Pc makes voluntary statement to D of P, after PTS Check, to the effect that he is not PTS, has had all the rundowns, and he lied his way through the last interview. Heavily asserting he is not PTS. AUDITOR'S C/S AND COMMENT -- MAA PTS Check came up with terminal. Then pc comes to D of P and says it was all PR. *1. 3 May PL including full R-Factor. When full formula written up -- 2. Check last terminal found for known before this life. If so do PTS RD steps and Can't Have on it. 3. If not do PTS Corr List to F/N list. Use Supp and Inval each line if needed. LRH COMMENT -- "Boy, I've seen PTSes before but seldom as much as he is. Probably doesn't know the words." Auditor continues, F/Ns the PTS Corr List and Pc declares. EXPANDED DIANETIC PROGRAM written 27.5.72. PTS now handled and declared. *FOOTNOTE: When this part of the C/S was done, the auditor could not get a read on the Listing Question. Pc said he was not involved in any out-ethics situation F/N, and so the action was dropped. 157 1. Sanderson RD (Exterior with full perception is a Hidden Standard). *2. PT Environment Handling. 3. Auditors, Auditing, etc handling. 4. Emotional White Form and handle. 5. Any Ev Purps R3R. 6. OCA and Pgm. AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Start Sanderson RD with **(a) L&N "What intention wd prevent being exterior with full perception" R3R Triple. (b) L&N Intention "another towards you" (F-2) R3R Triple. Then F-3. (c) When above done, 2wc "What do you really want handled?" (d) L&N Triple Intentions and R3R on any BD area. Auditor starts program and continues doing Sanderson RD as stated in above C/S on BD areas. AUDITOR'S C/S AND COMMENTS -- Doing fine but he hasn't made his laudable H. Std. of "Ext with full perception". Says the charge is off it but still wants to do it. Seems to me he is sitting at the end of a problem -- the solution of deciding to be Ext with full perception. If so, intentions prevent would only get the other half of the later problem and not the earlier one. If so, the suggest would be: 1. L&N "What problem might being ext with full perception be a solution to". 2. L&N "What intention of yours is connected with (item)". 3. R3R Triple. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "You're trying to run 3GAXX and calling it Exp Dn. All these prevents on significances. You'll spin him. You are really only correctly Exp Dn if you run Intentions on TERMINALS. You better get all cleared up on this before auditing him again. I don't think you ever read or studied the Sanderson RD. There is such a thing as a standard action. It's done the way it's done. We're not auditing in Keokuk on hunches and alter-ises. This is Flag. You keep this going and you'll be doing R2-12. *FOOTNOTE: This program is a bit sparse as it does not include the depth at which the pc is going to be run, for steps 2 and 3. **FOOTNOTE: This is out-tech as indicated by LRH later in this HCO B, and in HCO B 28 March 1974, Exp Dn Series 21, in that it lists an intention on a significance not a terminal. 158 Further the purpose of Exp Dn is to cure people or handle insanity. The standard way to handle a hidden standard (which is not just a physical or mental difficulty but one by which the pc measures his case gains). The Sanderson RD is a Wants Handled or Hasn't Been Handled. Not a hidden standard which by the definition of its words is a case measurement thing used secretly by the pc. We will admit this is a hidden standard. It's different than Intentions behind Somatics. To convert this to Exp Dn R3R: 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. L&N 'Who or what would want to be Exterior with full perception' (this gets it to a terminal). 3. L&N 'What would be the intention of (item found)'. 4. R3R Triple on Intention found. (If it goes 'me' for 2 and back to 'Want to be Ext', drop it as it will run late in the engram like in Ext.) 5. Hav." Auditor does C/S and it goes "me" and back to "Wants to be Ext" in 3. AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. PT Env 2wc. Triple assess and R3R. 2. C/S-6 list, Triple assess and R3R. 3. Emotional White Form and handle R3R Triple. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "Well done. We'll try another basic approach. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. 2wc 'What physical situation do you use to measure case gain by?' 3. Get what it is. Some BD Item. Use same phrasing he uses in doing L&N. 4. L&N 'What intention is connected to (item in 2). (If he comes up with the same Ext thing, run it R3R and watch it, be sure to call E/B.) 5. Hav. This is auditing by basic definition." The auditor did the above C/S and continued with the program, doing PT Env and C/S-6. On 3.6.72 auditor receives note from pc that auditing "going in circles" and indication of no-case-gain, and out-ethics situation. This note was from pc to his senior and contained a list of overts and omissions on post. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- All PT Env 2wc items handled. He wrote up the note before the session but I did not get it till after. May still have some ruds there. 159 1. Triple Ruds plus overts "on post". Get it all off. 2. Emotional White Form. 3. R3R Triple. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "Well done. C/S is incorrect. You are about to start a major step (W/F Emotional) on a pc whose Ethics are out. Ethics go hand in hand with PTS RDs so 3 May PL comes before or after it. This is one of your 'In the org SPs' in that he has only 1 SP who's in the org. Yet the U.S. Govt and Navy smashed him. Means a wildly PTS OUT OF VALENCE person on a wrong flow. The 'SPs are in the org', get it? So he's outside the Org criticising the Org so...... Learn to audit-C/S cases by fundamentals not rules or orders. You would have missed this product a mile. He's still so PTS he's out of valence and in an enemy valence. Those overts listed prove it. Requires a fast change of Pgm. I wondered where this case was at. Now I know. And so should you have. R-FACTOR: The next thing on your program is a 3 May 72 PL. 1. 2wc 'What do you have to say about that?' 2. R-Factor: You are in Danger due to omissions. 3. Step 1. 4. Step 2. WC. 5. Step 3 L&N to BD F/N. 6. R3R Triple on item. 7. Step 4 L&N to BD F/N item. 8. R3R Triple on item. 9. Tell him to write up formula." Along with this C/S LRH wrote a Pgm 4.6.72. LRH PROGRAM -- "PTS to Org Terminals only. Has out-ethics on post. PTS RD 'complete' but no real item found. 1. LRH C/S 4.6.72 (above). 1a. Triple Ruds on post. 2. Look up every unhandled (R3R) Ev Purp. Include those located and D/Led. Use these. R3R Triple. (Don't run ones twice.) 3. L10 Multiple Flow Ev Purps step. 4. R3R Triple. 5. PTS Corr List. Any additional and Can't Have. 6. Prior Confusion to beginning to goof. Find it and R3R it Triple. 7. OCA. 8. To Pgm Include Metalosis." This program was successfully completed by the auditor to Exp Dn completion. PC'S SUCCESS STORY -- When the Commodore handles someone he handles the hell Out of them, and the hell that came out of me was cracked by fantastic auditing. 160 I've had more case gain than I ever imagined possible. Thank you Sir. GRAPH when pc complete. [GRAPHICS INSERTED] Total No. of sessions 26. Total hrs in chair 38 hrs 28 min. EXP DN TEAM NOTE -- This pc remained stably off MO lines. The drop of three of the points on the right-hand side of the graph was due to "no interest" in running R3R on all of his Ev Purps. See HCO Bs Exp Dn Series 7 and 9. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 161  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=19/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 11 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE D   Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 19 OCTOBER 1972 Issued 28 March 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors HCO BULLETIN OF 19 OCTOBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 11 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE D OCA GRAPH -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES -- In the white on the right of the OCA. But pc has been chronically ill for a year. Her menopause started 2 1/2 years ago and she has a suspected tumor of the uterus. In present time pc is terrified that she has a malignant cancer. Very low on the Chart of Human Evaluation on several points. She attested OT III on 27.3.72 so she is out of the non-interference area. Medical reports requested re pc's cancer. No sign of the pc ever having had a C/S 1. EXPANDED DIANETIC PROGRAM by Dn Specialist. Approved and added to by LRH on 2.4.72. 0. Havingness before and after each session. *"0a. WCC List, clear words, reassess and handle. WCM1 clear words, reassess WCM1, handle." Added LRH 2.4.72. *FOOTNOTE: By HCO B 30 June 71, Issue II, Word Clearing Series 8RB (Revised 11 May 72) the list words of Ml are not cleared before assessment. The words of the commands of M1 may be cleared. 162 "0b. TA Trouble C/S 53RRR" added LRH 8.4.72. 1. Full C/S 1, clear all words on L3B and L1C. 2. Expanded Dianetics (a) 2wc her present time environment. Take best reading items and get her attitudes, emotions and sens on it. R3R Triple. Exhaust list. (b) Auditing -- Assess Class VIII list (C/S 6) then Att, Emot and Sens on best reading items, R3R Triple. "Intentions" added by LRH 21.4.72. (c) Do a White Form stressing losses, R3R Triple Narrative. R3R Triple reading emotions, and att towards illness and treatment. (d) LX3, LX2, LX1, R3R Triple. PTS RD or PTS Interview if needed -- added 20.4.72. (She is about .05 on Chart of Human Evaluation.) 3. New OCA -- new program. PROGRAM STARTED -- M1 going very well, and huge amounts of charge and misunderstoods coming off case. Three sessions later pc finds misunderstood which had her stuck in an incident and pc blows it with big win! Auditor ends off. Some trouble at the Examiner with a new one the pc doesn't like. Re-exam requested by the pc. Gets wide F/N VGIs on the win. Pc goes to Success and writes voluntary glowing success story. That night Auditor takes pc back into session and continues WCM1. After session exam TA high. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Pc was doing fine on word clearing M1. I ended on a big win. (She wrote a success story, I've just received it.) But she didn't F/N at the Examiner, she did on second exam which she requested. I took her in again tonight. We handled misunderstoods and WCCL and back to M1 but TA up at Exams. 1. Indicate WCCL in last session was unnecessary action. "Rehab win" added by LRH. 2. Fly a rud. 3. Continue M1 to F/Ning list. 4. Continue Program. LRH COMMENT -- "You O/R even further past the win by the Correction. When she did F/N (2nd Exam) you should have left it. If no joy with 1 send folder to me rush." Auditor does the C/S, okay on 1 so continues. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Rehabbed the win and continued M1. Pc started to protest (page 18). Her attention was on the big win again so I rehabbed it again. (Page 26 pc keyed in on counter-postulates she has.) I ended the session after the rehab. 1. Fly a rud. 2. Verify M1. 3. Continue Pgm. 163 LRH COMMENTS AND C/S -- TO D OF P AND LEAD AUDITOR "Well done by Exams. D of P: 'What did the auditor do?' Lead Auditor: Re (auditor) please find Why of forcing a pc and O/Ring and handle. (Also pc may be an Advanced Courses pc who doesn't belong to you. See request in folders if [auditor] can't do the history.)" TO AUDITOR "Well done by Exams. There is an auditing error here. You don't force pcs, particularly sick ones, never. You overrode her protest. An auditor mustn't have a tendency to Force or O/R against a protest without getting a Why of it. This makes the C/S incorrect here as you would just force her further. Auditing is for the pc. Also when a TA tends to go up there's something wrong, of which protest may be just a symptom. 1. C/S 53RRR Assess. Then check for any misunderstood words on it. (As it hasn't been cleared.) Send to me. (If it has misunderstoods on it clear them and reassess.) Also verify folder if this is a failed Adv Cse pc. If so give details." D OF P INTERVIEW -- Pc says, "Possibly some overrun that's all." LEAD AUDITOR -- Found Why on auditor as having lost sight of her purpose and took pc back into session "to get her hours up". Report on pc in regard to Adv Cses -- Audited 10 hrs on OT III finished in Review, has not had OT VII or OT IIIX. LRH -- Orders his "last C/S to be done." Auditor assesses 53RRR. Int and lists and others reading -- Wrong item F, Upset with giving items to auditor LF, Int tick and sF, TA between 3.0 and 2.8 during the assessment. Auditor also reports pc was sea-sick during voyage. Auditor returns the folder to LRH. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "A red tab with Out-Lists, was sea-sick but no dramamine. 164 * 1. Wrong Items L4B. 2. Upset with giving items to auditor -- L4B. 3. Pc withholding -- Pull all withholds triple. 4. Self auditing between sessions -- 2wc, then get the prior confusion that began it." C/S is done the next day. There is a slight overrun at the end of session and no F/N at Exams. AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- Outness was I went by the point of release to get prior confusion. Out obnosis, and auditing the C/S not the pc. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "You're an Auditor not a student. So don't act like a student learning to audit. 1. C/S 53RRR. Reassess with impingement with TRs in so you make any reads happen. 2. Handle. 3. Clear Hi-Lo List backwards, questions backwards from last question up. 4. Assess. 5. Handle." The above C/S is completed to a nice result and M1 word clearing is continued and completed and Pgm continued. Pc running very well on the PT Environment. In session of 19.4.72 pc says, "Spot on leg that hurts, want to go to Doctor." AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- I noticed pc's havingness drops very rapidly -- would like to run havingness after each chain. 1. Havingness. 2. Touch Assist. 3. Continue PT Environ. 4. Continue Pgm. 5. Hav before ending session. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done. C/S suggestion of running havingness after each chain not OK at all, would run a severe strain on pc extrovert-introvert wise. I don't see a PTS Interview or RD on this Pgm. The auditing C/S is OK. *FOOTNOTE: By Exp Dn Tape 4 Ext/Int reading on a list is handled by 2wc if the TA is in normal range. Here there is no sign of Int troubles and TA is at 2.8 and Int giving a very small meter read. It is omitted in the face of obvious out lists. 165 This pc is running great. I notice mixed therapies present." (On 20.4.72 the PTS RD -- if needed on PTS Interview is added to Pgm and on 21.4.72 Intentions are added to the Pgm by LRH.) Pc continues Pgm through WF Stressing Losses. Pc goes to Doctor. Doctor can't find any sign of tumor. Pc attests Exp Dn Chronic Illness Handling. D of P Interview reveals there is more to be handled so a new Pgm is written. AUDITOR'S NEW PROGRAM AND COMMENTS -- Per PTS Interview pc is PTS. Her graph has dropped on the left. Original program completed except for LXs not yet done. Chronic Illness now handled. 1. Disconnect or handle present PTS Type A situation through MAA. 2. Havingness before and after major actions of the session. 3. Clear each word on LX 321. *4. Assess and handle LX lists R3R Triple. 5. Check for and handle hidden standards on the internal trouble. (Sanderson RD added by LRH 2.5.72.) 6. Full PTS Rundown. 7. D of P Interview after RD. 8. Watch pc's folder for any new signs of RC or illness and if they occur, PTS RD Corr List and handle. New OCA. The new Pgm is started and pc runs fine through LXs. On the LXs a bit of O/R occurs after a huge valence shift. Auditor does step 5 of Pgm and comes up with more than one hidden std. LRH COMMENT 2.5.72 -- "Well done. She'll need the Sanderson RD. I put it in." Pc finishes Sanderson RD and the PTS RD is started with a 3rd May PL. The day after the pc is ill and writes a note and says she doesn't feel out of Danger. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- No session but from pc's note she's rollercoastering. So I suggest: 1. L4B. 2. Touch Assist. 3. Havingness. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "PTS is from suppression of some sort, is rollercoaster. But -- she was put in what was to her a wrong condition. Will turn on somatics and is kind of *FOOTNOTE: Per a more recent LRH dispatch, the words of the LX List are cleared before assessing it and the reads taken as they appear. 166 suppressive. So knowing the THEORY of PTS makes all that difference in C/Sing. KNOW, FIND OUT BEFORE YOU GO IN C/Sing. 1. Assess: Wrong Why _______ Wrong Items _______ Physical Illness _______ Wrong condition assigned _______ Something else _______ PTS to someone _______ (Assess by stating it as a fact not as a question.) 2. 2wc on best read, E/S to F/N. If wrong condition tell her so after the 2wc and tell you'll handle. 3. Touch Assist. 4. Havingness. Complete Pgm or correct it in light of any data above." The above C/S is done and new data arises on the pc's past entanglements with Ethics and conditions over quite a few years. A new Pgm is written. NEW PROGRAM BY EXP DN AUDITOR 12.5.72 -- This program to be done before step 5 of 25.4.72 Pgm. Touch assist was dropped off the last Pgm. Pc has now come up with a new chronic condition of ear trouble (D of P Interview not mentioned previously). Present time only 2wced before, not assessed. Intentions weren't stressed. 1. Hav run before and after major actions in each session. 2. Touch Assist till body well. 3. Assess Flag, the SO, Ethics, Out Ethics, Being a SO Member, duties, hats, schedules. 4. Get intentions -- others to her, hers to others, others to others and R3R Triple best reading items. Exhaust the list. 5. Assess: Difficulties, being suppressed, attacks, enemies, suppressing, incomplete cycles, unmocking, defense, protest, make nothing of, withdrawing from. 6. Same as 4 above. A few sessions later the auditor runs two items which come from the PT Environment buttons (The SO and Attitude of Morals) and runs into trouble. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Something very wrong here, she came in with F/N VGIs, did well on havingness and Touch Assist, but rollercoasters on PT Buttons. On Ethics TA soars on clearing intentions (this also happened before, she protested intentions in an earlier Pgm). I feel this Pgm is too heavy for her. I think we'll have to handle her current Ethics situation before continuing with auditing. She is still legally married to a psycho, who has had shock treatment several times and who she admits has SP characteristics. She has also mentioned she would like to handle her children's Out Ethics. 167 1. Handle all out 2D Ethics situations concerning her family properly -- by returning to Australia if necessary for a divorce. 2. Report to MAA when this is complete. Fitness Board. 3. PTS RD plus Can't Be, Do, Have Steps. LRH COMMENT 16.5.72 -- "Well done by Exams only. The purpose of an auditor is to handle the pc. You did something goofy beyond belief. Ran 'Interest' as an item. Then had trouble with the pc, then said offload her. To me this means you have decided to offload. This is one of the goofiest sessions I've seen for a while. You can't audit out pleasure moments. It hasn't been possible since 1950, and I don't know why you chase 'Interest in the Sea Org' as a bad thing and tried to R3R it. Positive don't run. So Auditor to Ethics for a 3 May 72. Pc being audited who is PTS and unhandled. D of P Interview to see if handled in any way. Interest as an Item? Morals as an Item?" At D of P Interview pc says doing very well, much better, VGIs, etc; but needle tight and sluggish and rises from 3.0 to 3.8. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "Red tab. Probably O/R on 'good' items that would have no aberration in them. 0. 53 RC to handle. 1. List out in chronological order all SP items found. *2. Run the 'Can't have, enforced have' motivator repetitive then overt repetitive, then Flow 3, terminal to others, others to terminal. (4 flows of 2 commands each.)" The auditor queries the C/S and states the PTS RD was mistakenly ticked off on the Pgm and not done yet. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 18.5.72 -- "All this randomity made me lose my place in the book. The check off threw it. Now I'm not sure where we are on her. Do a new Pgm picking up the old one and steps already done. Finish whatever major cycle she was on in Exp Dn then PTS RD, then Metalosis, then Ev Purps from L10. C/S 1. 53RC and handle. 2. L1C Recently. 3. Havingness." *FOOTNOTE: This RD is covered fully in HCO B 9 Dec 1971RA, "PTS Rundown". It is sometimes referred to as the Can't Have Steps or the Can't Have RD. 168 Auditor does above C/S and finds a wrong PTS item and handles and also writes a new Pgm. LRH COMMENT 18.5.72 -- "Very well done (for session). Pgm OK." AUDITOR'S NEW PROGRAM -- New Pgm as per LRH C/S 18.5.72 Touch assists to be run each session and havingness. 1. Complete the Sanderson RD. "1a. LRH C/S 20 May 72" added by LRH on that date (see below). 2. PTS RD plus Can't Have Steps. 3. Metalosis. 4. R3R Evil Purps from L10. 5. New OCA, new Pgm or declare. Next session auditor completes Sanderson RD and begins the PTS RD. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Went fine but on PTS RD she can't remember having had any S&Ds (two lots of S&Ds recorded in folder summary, but missing from folder). I could start doing R3R on terminals from D of P Interview, while I sort out the S&D scene. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Hav. 3. Select terminal from 2wc on who she's known this life that has troubled or worried her. 4. R3R Triple, Ruds and Overts. 5. Hav before ending. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- (Add to Pgm 20.5.72) "Well done (C/S error On your C/S). She had 2 lots of 3 S&Ds. This could be out lists yet they are missing. Look harder to see if pulled forward for a list correction. If still can't find still do C/S (i.e. LRH C/S). If can find list do C/S. An S&D list error can make a person sort of PTS with a Wrong Item! Don't audit over a suspected out list. Not even touch assists or Hav. 1. Reconstruct (or use) previous S&D lists. Verify items or correct. 2. L4B on S&D lists. 2a. Hav. 3. When fully assured it's correct and cool, use these items to begin the PTS RD. 4. R3R on those Former Life Known. 5. D of P Int taken items. 6. PTS RD Steps. 7. Hav." 169 Auditor starts PTS RD. Runs fine then on Can't Have TA soars and doesn't come down. Auditor runs Hav to F/N and ends. LRH -- "D of P Rush: 'What did the auditor do?'" D OF P INTERVIEW -- Well, could have gone past a sort of Release Point. Felt very good at one point, yes (F/N) felt OT (VGIs F/N) was playing around OT, yes (F/N IND). LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "Learn to see F/Ns, you just missed on the F/N that's all. 1. Check F3 Jupiter. Did it erase, rehab point of erasure. 2. If no joy do L3ExD on F3. 3. Verify if any further terminals, if so handle. 4. If all cool havingness. 5. Declare PTS RD complete. (Next is Metalosis RD.)" C/S is done. Pc declares PTS RD and Metalosis RD is started. Next session (just cleared words) auditor mentions TA going high, but coming down. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done. You worry too much about TA. It has to go up to get TA action." Metalosis is continued and completed. Auditor suggests declare. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done -- 25.5.72. Need D of P Interview. MO check and OCA before declare. Question is, is she a cured person." MO REPORT -- Pain in tummy on and off. Little bit of bleeding after the pain. Either she still has cyst in stomach or she's mocking it up. D OF P INTERVIEW -- Indicated something left to handle. OCA -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] 170 Very excellent change. LRH COMMENTS AND PROGRAM 27.5.72 -- "Incomplete product. Remains ill. Obviously PTS to other things. Illness -- PTS. Could be out ethics and PTS. Metalosis not finished. PTS incomplete. Finish what we are on and then do more PTS RD. (Full steps not done and very shallow.) Then 3 May PL. * 1. 2wc 'Tell me about your illness' (for data). 2wc What metal would one have in that area? Choose item R3R Triple. (Chastity belt is the obvious answer.) 2. 2wc to fish for electric fields in the area. R3R Triple. 3. Recheck all possible angles of field distortion of body in ill area. 4. When all angles of fields and metal exhausted in area: 4a. Ev Purps from L10. R3R Triple. 5. Go on with any missing steps of PTS RD. I don't think 'Who she's after' was done. Can't Have RD. 6. Check a Can't Hav assessment on: Bodies, babies, sex, Doctors, trouble, upsets, sexual oddities, sexual practices, etc. List intention L&N regarding object, R3R Triple. 7. Check an enforced have on: Bodies, illnesses, ovaries, womb, guts, sex, etc. Int, L&N, R3R Triple. 8. If all cool, 3 May PL. 9. 2wc 'On how she's doing, what she wants handled'. 10. L&N Intention or purpose regarding 9. 11. R3R Triple. 12. 2wc on how she's doing, what she wants handled. 13. L&N Intention or purpose re 12. 14. R3R Triple. 15. 2wc on how she's doing." LRH COMMENTS AND C/S 27.5.72 -- "Well she's still PTS. This is just a case of not really completing anything on the pc. Pgm calling for Ev Purps from L10 still not done apparently. PTS RD short changed (step missing apparently). Metalosis not really bled for the works. She's also mixing practices. Nothing a Medic can do for her. 1. 2wc 'Tell me about your illness'. 2. 2wc 'What metal would one have had in that area?' 3. Choose best items R3R Triple. 4. Word clear electromagnetic field fully. Clear field distortion. 5. 2wc 'What could cause a field distortion in that area?' Get items. *FOOTNOTE: This is the "Metalosis RD" and will be covered more fully as to theory and application in HCO Bs later in the Exp Dn Series. 171 6. R3R Triple. 7. Havingness." Pc is sent to the Examiner for "What did the Auditor do". Pc says, "Overran me on some things and seems to be handling same stuff and re-running." LRH NEW C/S AND COMMENTS 28.5.72 -- "Run this before 27 May C/S. See Exam report. Pc looks very bad, much too bad for this much auditing, so sent to Exams by C/S for 'What did the Auditor do'. You're O/Ring F/Ns and running things twice. This pc better start looking good. We've cured 3 of these cysts in the last couple of years, a 100% record. 1. L1C M3 on Recent Auditing. 2. C/S 53RC. Handle. 3. L3ExD to F/Ning list. Then do 27 May and DO NOT by-pass F/Ns or run unreading items on this pc or run same chains twice!" The above C/S 28.5.72 and the 27.5.72 C/S are done and continued and the pc doing very well. Metalosis is completed and the PTS RD. On 11.6.72 the Can't Have, Enforced Hav Assessment steps are completed. The 3 May PL is done. The illness is attacked from all quarters with the Sanderson RD. On 20.6.72 pc attests to Thetan Exterior. She completes the Wants Handled RD (Sanderson) to F/N VGIs. The pc is sent to declare Exp Dn complete but fails the Exam. The next session the PTS Corr List reveals that pc is still dependent on her SP husband for support, as divorce = loss of money. She had disconnected in every way except through this House = Money Line. Pc has 5 Apr PL handling and decides to get the divorce. D of P Interview to see how she is doing. VGIs, all illness fine. Doing very well. Tone 3.5. Pc sent for re-declare. Wide F/N VGIs 21.8.72. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Nice change, Love Ron." SUCCESS STORY -- I was one of those tough cases, but I knew if me and the Auditor kept handling the hell out of it that one day we would get the last little bit holding it in place. Thanks to the Auditor we uncovered it and within a few days the illness miraculously disappeared. My illness has gone. 172 Many, many thanks to LRH and my Auditor and the D of P. TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 56. TOTAL HOURS IN THE CHAIR: 132 hrs 20 min. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:SW:MM:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 173  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=20/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 12 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE E  Type = 11 iDate=20/10/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN Remimeo 20 OCTOBER 1972 Ex Dn C/Ses Issued 28 March 1974 Ex Dn Auditors CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 12 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE E OCA GRAPH 3.4.72 -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES AND EXP DN PGM BY DN SPECIALIST Incomplete Dianetic pc with staledate LRH C/S from Dec 6, 71 for Dn FFT and L3B RD -- R/Sing on "postulate checks" "spinning" and "out- ethics". OCA low on right, up on left. Per Exp Dn lecture No. 1 FFT are only done if it comes up or bogs running triples. Case Level OT VII. 0. Declare M 1 WCing complete. 1. Havingness process found and run at end of each session. 2. Clear each word in L3ExD and R3R commands. 3. L3ExD Rundown (M5 and handle to F/Ning list). 4a. L-10 Ev Purps run R3R Triple. (Added later.) 4b. 2wc PT Environment and note all BD items. 5. Take best reading items in 4 and get emotions and intentions connected to items -- R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 6. Assess C1 VIII list (C/S 6), get intentions, emotions connected to best reading items R3R Triple. 6a. Emotional Stresses WF handle R3R Triple. 174 *7. Clear and assess LX3 handle R3R Triple. *8. Clear and assess LX2 handle R3R Triple. *9. Clear and assess LX1 handle R3R Triple. 10. New OCA. PROGRAM STARTED On 23.4.72. LRH NOTE -- "This pc has had lots of Evil Purps found on L-10. These must all be R3Red Trip." (This step added to the Pgm.) (On the auditor's C/S LRH writes, "Well Done. C/S omits this Note which has to be done as it's this environ.") The auditor completes the Pgm. The pc runs very fast, so a new Pgm is written. SECOND PGM BY EXP DN SPEC 25.4.72 -- First program complete. There's still plenty to dig up on him. He's not low on the left but has one point on the right that's low. He is running engrams and implants well. He wants his O/Ws handled so this should do a good job on it. 0. Havingness at start and end of each session. 1a. Assess the Admin Scale. 1b. Get intentions connected to best reading items, R3R Triple, to F/Ning list. 2a. Assess: Games, rules, players, barriers, freedoms, possibility of winning, possibility of losing. 2b. Get intentions connected to best reading items, R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 3a. Assess: Postulate checks, Gross Income, Income, bills, reserves, purchase orders, crush sell, hot prospect reg, pirates, money, Ethics. 3b. Get intentions connected with best reading items R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 4a. Assess: Orgs, ASHO, USLO, Sea Org, AOLA, Execs, Org Officers, Product Officers, C/Os. 4b. Get intentions connected, run R3R Triple to F/Ning list. **5a. Slow assess R1C and note all BD items. 5b. Get intentions connected to best reading items R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 6. New OCA. The auditor does the entire program with Ev Purps coming off nicely. The OCA given at the end of this Pgm showed a slight drift of all traits except G which remained very fixed as the low point of the whole graph. *FOOTNOTE: Per a more recent LRH dispatch, the words of the LX lists are cleared before assessing it and the reads taken as they appear. **FOOTNOTE: See HCO B 4 December 1971, "R1C Assessment by Dynamics". 175 LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Somebody missed the Ev Purps on him." THIRD PGM BY EXP DN SPEC -- The right side of his graph is coming up slowly but surely. But there's more work to do -- more O/Ws to get off. 0. Havingness at start and end of each session. 1. Pick up reading items from Admin Scale when previously handled and get "another's intentions towards you connected to ( )". Run R3R Triple. 2. Pick up reading items from list of games, rules, players, barriers, freedoms, possibility of winning, possibility of losing. Get "another's intentions towards you connected to (_______)". R3R Triple. 3. Pick up reading items from list (postulate checks, G1, income, etc). Get "another's intentions towards you connected to (_______)". R3R Triple. 4. Pick up previously reading items from list (Org, ASHO, USLO, etc). Get "another's intentions towards you connected to (_______)". R3R Triple. 5. Clear and assess Know to Mystery Scale. Get intentions connected to reading items 3 flows to F/Ning list. 6. Assess A-R-C-U take biggest read and Curious About _______ Desired _______ Enforced _______ Inhibited _______ No _______ Refused _______ Broken _______ Denied _______ False _______. Run R3R Triple on best reading items. Reassess to F/Ning A-R-C-U. 7. Clear and assess the Awareness Scale levels. Run reading items R3R Triple. Reassess and handle to F/Ning list. 8. Assess the Havingness Scale. Run reading items R3R Triple. 9. Assess: Failed havingness, failed interest, failed communication, failed control, failed help, failed overts, failed importance, failed leave, failed protect, failed to abandon, failed to endure, inverted help, inverted control, inverted comm, inverted interest, obsessive can't have, no effect. Run reading items R3R Triple. 10. Using above buttons substitute "desired" for "failed" R3R Triple. Then substitute "enforced" and "inhibited" and handle -- R3R Triple. 11. Assess Expanded Tone Scale and handle R3R Triple. 12. 2wc "What do you really want handled" -- on that item L&N to BD F/N item -- "What intention would prevent you from (_______)". R3R Triple on the intention. The Pgm is started and goes quickly. At step 12 (Sanderson RD) after the session the auditor writes "No real Wow". The auditor's C/S is to continue the Sanderson RD. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done. Being audited over out ruds and M/Us." LRH adds to the auditor's C/S: " 1. Fly all ruds and overts triple. 1a. Check for MisU words M4." AUDITOR'S COMMENTS (Next Session) -- He got his wow. Looks like the EP of Exp Dn. 176 1. New OCA. 2. D of P Interview. 3. If OK declare. LRH COMMENT 1.5.72 -- "Very well done, Wow!" D OF P INTERVIEW -- Very good. OCA GRAPH -- Trait G in the same place, unmoving. Auditor at this point examines the OCA questions answered wrongly by the pc and works out the common denominator. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Not OK to declare. Trait G still down. Looked up the questions on OCA and common denominator is "Can't take responsibility for the actions of those close to him, is swayed by personalities". C/S and PROGRAM are identical. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. L&N "Intentions regarding (terminal close to pc)". R3R Triple on intention. 3. L&N "(Terminal close to pc's) intention regarding you". R3R Triple the intention. 4. L&N "(Terminal close to pc's) intention regarding others". R3R Triple the intention. 5. 2wc "The group the pc involved with". 6. Steps 2, 3, 4, on hot terminals from 5. 7. 2wc "Personalities you've known". 8. Steps 2, 3, 4, on hot terminals from 7. 9. PTS RD. Include "What persons have you really liked or admired". LRH COMMENT -- "Go ahead and try it. That unchanging graph is pretty spooky. If no shift then he has done and is doing things. Very ungood." Auditor does the Pgm up to the PTS RD (step 9) in one session. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- This didn't bite. Pc showed signs of overrun. C/S -- PTS RD. LRH PROGRAM 4.5.72 -- "Mess in (U.S. Org) over his funds handling. Probably afraid of Ethics. Something we don't know about this pc. Need data. Not getting anywhere. Awful OCA. 177 1. LRH C/S of 4 May 72 (see below). 2. Pgm accordingly." LRH C/S 4.5.72 -- "Well done. Both he and (Org Exec) are very worried. Note 1.1 remark to Examiner. This guy is Out-Ethics. 1. Assess: Out Lists (L4B if so) _______ Worried about Flag _______ Worried about (U.S. Org) _______ Worried about Ethics _______ Concerned over (Org Exec) _______ W/Hs from Flag _______ Out-Ethics situation _______ PTS _______ Connected to a hostile person _______ Saying things to someone else _______ Discussing things out of session _______ Concerned about others' intentions _______ Afraid of trouble _______ Failed purpose _______ Want to leave _______ Don't feel safe _______ O/R on words _______ Misunderstoods _______ People not saying _______ Others withholding from you _______ Heard things _______ Something unhandled _______ 2wc to F/N -- best to worst reads in turn. 2. C/S 53RRR handle." The auditor does the full C/S. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- His biggest concern right now is finishing his auditing, getting a post and finding out what's going to happen with him. He's stuck in a continuous PTP -- Mystery as far as what will happen to him. He's also stuck in a win from a session with (....) on 1 May 72. 1. Put him to work as an expeditor. 2. PTS Check and 5 Apr 72. LRH PROGRAM -- "He needs 3 May 72 PL Steps. 178 D of P Interview to give him R-Factor C/S 5 May 72. Handle what comes up. LRH COMMENTS AND C/S 5.5.72 -- "Well done. Conclusion reached is not the correct one for the case. PTPs go with E/S, or Exp Dn. Also after a case F/Ns on a subject it's usually blown. The answers tend to be what's wrong and the F/N says no longer that wrong. Get it? So now we can handle. There's an Out-Ethics scene with him. It F/Ned on worry about it but not what it was. The OCA says he's still bad off and it isn't changing. And he was the person making trouble in (U.S. Org) with borrowings and donations. D OF P R-FACTOR: The Commodore is trying to handle things so you can be sent back to (U.S. Org) very soon. In order to do this he has to make sure things will be all right with you and (U.S. Org). Your OCA is low and didn't change. There's a new Rundown that handles this by handling the person's personal life. If you are willing to co-operate we will do this. The Commodore is trying to keep Ethics off your back over the donations being irregular. This can be worked out but only if you co-operate. Are you agreeable to do this new Rundown?" The D of P R-Factor is done. LRH C/S 6.5.72 -- "TO C1 XII auditor. Do it gently. Please do the PL 3 May all steps on pc. Work it out as you go. *Step 3 L&N 'The Out-Ethics scene' item. Step 4 L&N 'How it would be a betrayal to Scn and Flag'. And get him to apply the formula." The above C/S is done and gets a VWD and at this point tile folder goes to Dept XII (Class XII auditing) where the pc gets his L-10 and L-10M checked over and fixed, which takes one 7 hr session. Pc now gets new OCA (11.5.72). This crashes badly. Trait C down to -52, Trait G goes lower to -84 and Point A down also. LRH COMMENT 12.5.72 -- "May have caved him in or made him more honest or made him guilty or something. *FOOTNOTE: This is the incorrect L&N question. The correct question is "What Out-Ethics situation are you involved in?" per HCO B 10 June 72, "Refer to HCO PL 3 May 72 'Ethics and Executives'". 179 Needs Hav every session and will get the new PTS RD when it comes up.,, NEW PROGRAM BY CL XII 12 May 72. OKed and added to by LRH. OCA Graph crashed after L-10M Corr. Something missed. Got to finish him off. Uneducated pc. "Use Hav every session." -- LRH. 0. Standard PTS Check as per HCO PL 5 April 72. Handle. 1. Ruds triple of long duration, including overt. 2. 2wc "Was anything missed in the last auditing that you had". Get an answer. Handle what found E/S or by list. 3. Method 4 "On auditing" and "Scn in general". Really clean up every faintest doubt. *4. Clear GF 40X words, assess Method 6, use 2wc (no recall/engram). 5. L3B Rundown on earliest engrams run. (L3ExD.) 6. PTS Rundown "with new 'Can't Have' RD" -- LRH. (Use terminals in PTS Check.) 6a. Triple Recall/Engrams of GF 40X. 7. Redo Method 1 W/Cing. (Was cheated on it as words of assessment were cleared.) 8. Full Flow Dn Table to completion. 9. Complete Expanded Dianetics started. Exp Dn Auditor does this program. All goes fine. Pc running and having very big wins on PTS RD. On completion of Can't Have RD PTS Corr List, pc takes a new OCA. The OCA recovers somewhat. The -52 Trait C comes up and the Trait G (Responsible) recovers. But only to its original stuck point. Auditor continues and completes step 6a of the Pgm. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- He's already had the GF40X items handled and redoing them was an O/R. He also was not quickied on either of his two M1 W/Cings so I left it alone. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Full Flow Dn Table. 3. Havingness. ANOTHER LRH NOTE -- "This 'stuck point' of OCA is another Ev Purp, fixated. It will blow off or we'll find it. He's going according to standard reaction except for one stuck point on the right." *FOOTNOTE: Method 6 is a method of assessment used in C1 XII auditing where each question on the list is assessed by looking at the pc and asking him directly. 180 LRH COMMENTS AND C/S -- "Very well done. He doesn't need a FF Dn. We've sort of lost our place in the book on the Exp Dn RD. I see it 'started' but no Pgm. Do new Pgm. I see he's had his L-10 Ev Purps. This cat is nearly through. He has a stuck viewpoint. He has not had metalosis. Exp Dn recovers graphs. The stuck graph point is Responsibility Irresponsibility. R-Factor: You will be here a few more days before leaving for (a U.S. Org). 1. Fly all ruds Triple (to get the air clean) -- (Org associate) is leaving. 2. 2wc mark all reads and BDs as we want THE ITEM. 'What would it be awful to have to take responsibility for?' (and let's not have an everything's okay F/N). WC the hell out of the question backwards first. There's a trick of impinging such a Q after WCing. 'Now I'm going to ask you a very serious question and I want you to give it every thought.' Then ask it. 3. When you have the item that really read well, L&N 'What would be the intention of somebody who would do that?' If the answer to Q2 above was a goal or intention, omit this. 4. R3R Triple on it. 5. Havingness." The auditor does the C/S and pc has huge win, and goes exterior with perception. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 20.5.72 -- WE FINALLY DID IT!!! His graph is beautiful. He totally changed -- Ext + perception among other things. Your C/S hit right where he needed it. He finally got the R/S and Ev Purp run that was pinning him down. Declare Exp Dns Complete. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Absolutely classical. Exp Dn at its best!" SUCCESS STORY -- I have never achieved so much. Boy!!! This is a breakthrough beyond my belief. I feel clean, I have changed physically. I feel healthier and more honest. Sir, all my thanks. 181 GRAPH WHEN PC COMPLETE -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 19. TOTAL HRS IN THE CHAIR: 46 hrs 20 min. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 182  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=21/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=1 Rev=1 rDate=30/4/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 13R EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE F  Type = 11 iDate=21/10/72 Issue=1 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 21 OCTOBER 1972R Remimeo Issue I Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors Revised 30 April 1975 CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 21 OCTOBER 1972 Issue I (Revisions in this type style) Expanded Dianetics Series 13R (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE F OCA GRAPH 22. 12.71 (last graph before Exp Dn available) -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES AND SET-UP PROGRAM BY EXP DN SPEC -- Case Level OT IIIX. Chronic sickie. Bypassed Dn Case. L-11 and L-12 over very unflat Dianetics. Has run well on emotions. Misemotional about auditing. Refused auditor change. PTS RD done and corrected, but no MAA check done. 0. Hav before and after each session. 1. D of P do PTS check and handling as necessary. 2. Who wd I have to be to audit you? to EP. "2a. What could you talk to me about?" added by LRH. 3. Hav + Touch Assists until pc stronger. 4a. Clear WCCL and WC M1 C/S 1. 4b. WCCL to F/Ning list. 4c. WC M1. Add: Processing, tech, study, Orgs, despatches. Handle to F/Ning list. 5. WC M2 first materials read or heard: (a) In Scientology (b) In Admin. 6. To Ex Dn. 183 PROGRAM STARTED 20.4.72 D OF P INTERVIEW -- On checking for PTS Type A pc says no. However, pc does feel she's PTS to post environment. Pc says, "I am physically sick and because of that I'm getting Exp Dn. So far had a lot of medical handling and so far not much handled. The Doctor I just went to seems to think he spotted some sort of worm in my system, but it's not verified yet. MO should have the data but that's a medical thing. I know that I've got an overactive colon and also an ovarian infection. I don't feel like I'm PTS -- if I am it's a case thing." D OF P COMMENTS -- Pc really not confronting, obviously she is still sick! But with D of P action could not punch through that and get what it was, or is. She's just very strongly blank on it. LRH COMMENT -- "No she isn't blank. She's PTS to Environment of Post! PTS is a Person or Thing. New Pgm needed to list this. D of P. Do on meter next time." LRH C/S 20.4.72 -- "Says she was PTS to Env of Post. She is PTS. She thought you'd debar auditing I'm sure. 1. Clear backwards, L&N 'Who or What in your post environment were you PTS to?' Check for read. List to BD F/N item. 2. R3R Triple on item." The pc was not audited that day so LRH put the above C/S as Step 3a on the program and C/Sed to do Step 2 first. LRH C/S 21.4.72 -- "1. Who would I have to be to audit you? F/N. 2. What could you talk to me about? F/N. 3. Touch Assist. 4. Hav." The C/S was done. In addition the MO gave the pc a couple of touch assists for a pain in the lower tummy. The pc says at the Examiner: "It was a nice session. But there is something with R3R and me that don't agree. But I liked the session." TA 2.2 Normal F/N VGIs. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Pc's in-session mannerisms are so similar to (Case B's) initial sessions it's amazing. The same "Well it's a bit silly trying to run engrams on me, but I'll play along" attitude. 184 We're not in the pc's area of interest. 0. D of P PTS check. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Clear L3ExD Word. 3. L3ExD RD to EP. 4. 2wc "What do you really want handled?" Note all LF, BD items. On this day LRH sends a note down for the folder: "This pc has had a lot of Evil Purposes found on L-10, etc that will have to be R3Red. She has MisUs on and wrongly run Dn." The auditor seeing this note writes a note to LRH. AUDITOR NOTE 23.4.72 -- Dear Sir, Per my 21.4.72 session pc is much stronger, having had regular Touch Assists from the MO. She is up most of the day now. Suggest my attached C/S. 1. D of P PTS check. 2. 2wc to F/N. 3. Clear WCCL and WC C/S 1 words. 4. WCCL to F/Ning list. 5. Hav to F/N. LRH REPLY 23.4.72 -- "Hey, no. She just fell on her head yesterday. See exam report." (See above.) "Do C/S." (See below.) The word MO in the note is ringed and LRH writes "She's your pc." LRH C/S 23.4.72 -- "Well done. No initial (LRH) on pgm itself. We're out of her depth too soon. This is a detached sort of pc. Attention mainly on body (2D history), she's not confronting. Possibly even below bank awareness. Possibly just sensation or pain registers. This Pgm Step 3 not completed. (Hav and Touch Assists until pc stronger.) 1. 2wc to F/N. (Just to get in comm a bit.) 2. Touch Assist. 3. Hav." The auditor does the Touch Assist and on his own C/S he draws a box with the caption "Space for LRH to write 'See? -- I told ya, didn't I?'." 185 LRH writes in the box "When all else fails do what Ron says." And by the caption he writes "I never say I told you so, I rarely have to." The session is given a " Very well done" and the next C/S to continue the Touch Assist and Hav is "Okayed". This routine is continued for 3 days. On the 26.4.72 LRH adds to the auditor's C/S. AUDITOR'S C/S -- 1. Hav to F/N. 2. Touch Assist to win. "2a. 2wc to F/N (just to give her a little bit of straight auditing to groove her in)," added by LRH. 3. Hav to F/N. Several sessions of above a day. This is continued each day till the 30.4.72. At the Examiner the pc says, "I feel like I came out of a terrible death or something. I had a terrible attack of God knows what." LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "Well done by Exams. *This pc had to have another T Assist after this session. She is also malingering. Rides motorcycles, dances, yet 'too ill to work'. So she goes to SPF and off MO lines. 1. Fly all ruds triple. 2. PTS C/S 20 April 72. We now take gloves off." The PTS Interview C/S of 20.4.72 was done. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- She's PTS to "People" -- oh Boy. 1. Hav to F/N. 2. L&N "W/W wd represent people?" (Clear backwards and check for read.) 3a. Clear R3R words. 3b. R3R Triple item. 4. Triple ruds and overt item in F1 Basic Incident. 5. PTS RD Corr List. Clear and assess to F/Ning list. LRH -- "OK". The auditor does the above C/S. Towards the end of session the pc says "feeling of being unsafe -- don't know if handled or not". AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 8.5.72 -- Handled the item which would represent "people". Good result. *FOOTNOTE:. SPF = Stewards Project Force. 186 She had a H. Std at end of session -- p. 26 on "doesn't know if handled yet". Should be handled as part of this program. I suggest: 0. Hav to F/N. 1. L&N Intentions connected with "feeling of being unsafe" (check for read and if none and if supp and inval don't read, drop it). 2. R3R Triple. 3. Clear WCCL and WC M1 commands. 4. WCCL to F/N list. 5. WC M1 and added subjects. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 9.5.72 -- "Well done. C/S suggestion is a serious error. You must combine significances with terminals, not with significances. You can't list successfully 'What is your thought about a thought?' You can list successfully 'What is your thought about a mass?' (or terminal?). 'What mass could be connected to what thought' could even be listed. You start running significances about what masses and you'll do well. If you start running thoughts about thoughts you'll pull thoughts out of engrams and restim the devil out of the bank. You have an Exp Dn Item in 'feeling very unsafe'. What more do you want! But this pgming is kind of crazy on this pc. It is sort of out of sequence. How come we're repairing M1 before we finish the Exp Dn. Why wasn't M1 corrected first. Also I don't know what 'Ruds on Basic F1 Inc' was all about. I don't even know what was meant, as can't tell from W/S. This pc is being run off pgm. Finish what you have your hands on. Don't step about. 1. 2wc 'What she feels unhandled about what we ran?' Note all BD F/N Items. 2. Touch Assist. 3. Hav. Reprogram this case. Get R3R or whatever in on the C/S above. Then get the pgm smoothed out. It's jumped the rails." AUDITOR'S NOTE TO LRH -- Dear Sir, Re your C/S for pc of 9.5.72. You mention not digging the Triple Ruds on Basic of F-1 Incident. This was done as the L&N was to specify the terminal she was PTS to after D of P Interview came out with "PTS to people". The HCO B requiring Triple Ruds on Basic of F-1 Incident is 13 Feb 72, written by OJR and LK. It is attached -- refer page 2. This was applied in this case as the step was to handle PTS terminal. 187 As the HCOB is not written by you I am bringing it up in case there has been an error. Love, (Auditor). LRH REPLY -- *"Got it. No, it's okay." At this time the pc comes off the antibiotic (Chloramphenicol) that she had been on but temperature went right up again so the MO put her back on the antibiotic. The above LRH C/S was done. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Did the 2wc and Touch Assist. Per her Itsa she's just short of being fully cured. (Origin to C/S last couple of pages.) 1. Rud to F/N. 2. R3R Triple on "unsafe" item mentioned. (Get her to state item.) "Use her wording only when given" added by LRH. 3. 2wc "How are you doing now?" 4. If all well attest Exp Dn complete. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done." The auditor does the C/S. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Went fine. See 2wc Orig -- she has some hidden standards and also some attention on PTS and on her effect on body. I haven't seen the latest on PTS RD yet but as the last action was the "final" step of her last PTS Interview being handled I wd suggest: 1. Any further PTS handling (per recent researches). 2. To Exp Dn Pgm. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 13.5.72 -- "Well done. I don't see a hidden standard. I do see a PTS situation or overlooked terminal. See in red correct way to clarify words on a W/S. Don't overwrite. (diff color) -- > TOTALLY Example from W/S: Want to get xxxx well / Illegible word / **See (other pc folder) note of this date for new PTS RD steps. FOOTNOTE: Above HCO B on running Ruds on F-1 basic was later cancelled as an incorrect procedure. **FOOTNOTE: This now issued as an HCO B -- 9 Dec 1971RA, "PTS Rundown". 188 As these are run a new terminal may show up. 1. PTS Can't Have RD." LRH PROGRAM 13.5.72 -- "PTS RD incomplete as still ill. 1. Can't Have RD. 2. When a new item shows up, D of P Int and PTS engrams on it, then complete the Can't Have RD. 3. Then to Exp Dn." AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S (After doing above C/S) -- RD going well. Auditor error -- slow TRs = underestimating pc = not auditing pc in front of him. Also she ran into physical tiredness due to not having her usual mineral supplement from MO today. (Obnosis slip.) I handled the TRs. 0. Ensure not tired and well fed. "00. Fly all ruds" added by LRH. 1. Complete remaining terminals on Can't Have. *2. To D of P to verify or trace other terminals mentioned in end of today's session to which the pc may be PTS. 3. PTS RD on any found if known before this L/T. 4. Check for any others. 5. Repeat 3. 6. Can't Have RD on any terminals so handled. 7. When complete declare Exp Stability RD complete. LRH COMMENT 15.5.72 -- "Well done. She's very critical. Note the ruds added." The PTS RD is extended for several sessions. Then pc goes to MO with heart palpitations. MO MEDICAL REPORT 21.5.72 -- **Heavy heart palpitations B/P 145/70. *FOOTNOTE: This was a D of P type Interview. When this comes up in the middle of the PTS RD like above this could normally be done in session by the auditor. (The why and handling steps are done in HCO or by the D of P per C/S Series 76.) **FOOTNOTE: Blood Pressure (B/P) is measured as the maximum pressure the heart exerts through the blood system (the top figure) and the minimum pressure the heart allows through the system (the bottom figure). It is measured as so many centimeters of mercury. This is a method and unit of measuring pressure originally used by physicists. 189 Did a Touch Assist, brought it back down to normal 120/55. Heavy gas pains on left side of chest and left arm alleviated by Touch Assist. For the last days when going to sleep heart palpitations started, and last night got so bad she could not sleep. Given Calcium and Pantothenic Acid. After the session on the 21.5.72 the auditor writes to LRH, along with his session comments and C/S. AUDITOR'S NOTE 21.5.72 -- Dear Sir, Please note that 2 out of 3 terminals in this session were not this L/T terminals but suppressives of whom she was reminded by PT Restimulators. This may have been an error to run. Definite data not in PTS Pack. Is this an error? AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Thought you should see this one. She had had the heart palpitations which she was discussing in last session which occurred when upset by (_______) last year. As she is in auditing -- PTS RD, I suggest: 1. PTS RD Corr List, "In your recent auditing". Assess and handle to F/N list. 2. Verify remaining terminals and run if indicated. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "Error here in running 'reminded of in past for a PT terminal. Has recoiled on the pc. The C/S is correct. Add a 3 May 72 PL to the list soonest. (LRH added to the 13.5.72 Pgm.) Ruds probably out." The auditor does the C/S to a good result. The Med Report for the day says pc is feeling A-OK. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- The BPC was an implant stirred up while running one of those past SPs. This has been repaired -- the engram in restim was R3R Tripled. The PTS Corr List was done to F/N list. Per her origin she is certain about not being PTS. Suggest we let her have that unless any sign of rollercoaster appears. 1. HCO PL 3 May 72 in full. (+ L&N, up to 1st Dynamic formula to be done herself.) 2. 2wc "How do you feel about Ethics?" to F/N. 3. 2wc "How do you feel about your PTS RD?" to F/N. 190 LRH COMMENTS AND C/S 23.5.72 -- "Your C/S is backwards. Finish a cycle (PTS in this case) before entering another. 1. 5 April 72 PL D of P. Handle anything that needs it on PTS RD. If okay to auditor: 2. 2wc 'How do you feel about your PTS RD'. (Be sure it's ended.) 3. Declare. Then next step do 3 May 72 PL." The above C/S was done to good result. The auditor then wrote an Exp Dn program. EXP DN PGM BY DN SPEC 23.5.72 -- 0. Hav = "Notice that". "00. Needs a 3 May 72 PL" added by LRH. 1. Clear all terms. 2. Sanderson RD. 3. PT Environment handling. 4. Auditor's auditing handling. 5. Emotional Stress WF handling. 6. LXes 321 handling. 7. OCA. The 3 May PL is done and the pc has a huge win. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Well the 3 May PL produced a clear list Q and an origination on a huge win -- "an OT thing". Should be identified if possible. 1. D of P "What happened in your recent win?" for data. 2. Declare if one is in order. 3. Do steps 1, 2 and 3 of the Pgm. The pc has D of P Interview and declares Mest Universe Release. The pc takes a new OCA. OCA GRAPH 25.4.72 -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] 191 LRH COMMENT -- "It's changing anyway." The Sanderson RD is started and continues very well for several sessions. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- There was still charge from the bypassed win and some other points. Did a GF -- still hot -- and cleared all up. The one thing she most wants handled is "This Evil Purpose I'm sitting on", BD 2.0 to 1.8. Suggest: 1. L&N "What evil purpose has been missed?" 2. R3R Triple. 3. Hav. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done, you're doing better now." The next session goes to pieces. The auditor gets off on a list correction and the pc gets very upset and red tags at the Examiner. The auditor sends the pc to the D of P for a "What did the auditor do" to cool her off. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 31.5.72 -- "Same auditor on this pc. They both have to confront it. I can't really make it out. Can't read some of the Admin and I'm not sure what went on. Change of procedures? I don't know where it came from. The C/S for the session, 2nd session, doesn't exist so I guess you were C/Sing in the chair, a grave fault. This sort of reaction comes from list errors. Essentially she thought you were DENYING HER AN ITEM. She's not up to any of this. 1. R-Factor: I have some questions here to solve the upset. Were you being denied the item? _______ Were earlier wrong lists restimulated? _______ Do you have a withhold? _______ Wouldn't the auditor listen? _______ Some other upset? _______ You didn't agree with something? _______ Was your list suppressed and invalidated? _______ 2wc the result E/S and handle. 2. What part of the session could you confront? Repetitive, not 2wc to F/N, VGIs. 3. Havingness." This C/S was done to a moderate result but the lists were never really picked up and handled properly. The Exp Dn Pgm was continued but soon the pc was in trouble. 192 AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Wow. Seems she's gone past the point where she was cured and well and has developed a lot of BPC on inval because Dn was continued and she feels it was "complete" some time. Whole session was getting off BPC on being O/R as a case and protesting further Dianetics. 1. Fly a Rud. 2. Rehab big win in Dianetics recently (Mest Universe Release). 3. Get point where she realized she was no longer ill. Rehab. 4. Declare Exp Dn Completion. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 3.6.72 -- "No. Off Exp Dn Lines. TO CL XII C/S This pc is having list trouble by reads 2 sessions back. Early list restimmed read. They're not repaired. Please have a XII handle her lists, rehab any win and remove from auditing lines." LRH PROGRAM 4 June 72 -- "Is exhibiting wrong list behavior in recent sessions, read on 'earlier wrong lists', handling was quickied. Pc still upset. Also pc finds only Org terminals as SPs. So she is not PTS, she is..... (see Exp Dn Case C). 1. Find and correct all earlier lists. See LRH C/S of June 72. Don't not do it! Auditor already flunked it. 2. 3 May 72 PL -- 2 lists. 3. L-3XDn RD. 4. Find all Ev Purps gotten off on L-10 or in recent sessions, even those dated and located and list them from earliest one. R3R Triple. Get them all. 5. Locate any new ones. R3R Triple. 6. PTS Corr List and additional + Can't Have. 7. Metalosis. 8. OCA." LRH C/S 4.6.72 -- "See Pgm. Locate all uncorrected lists and correct item as she exhibits wrong list behavior in sessions and is very upset on the subject. 1. Correct any and all wrong lists from earliest forward. Do nothing else until action is complete." The List Correction is fully done by a Cl XII Auditor and the pc has a huge case resurgence. Pc attests Review complete. 193 SUCCESS STORY 16.6.72 -- This was definitely the best Review I have ever had. It changed my life greatly and gave me some answers I have been looking for for a long time. It is deeply appreciated. At this point the LRH Pgm is continued by an Exp Dn Auditor. This is still in progress at this point in time. The last OCA to be taken is on 22.7.72. PC'S LAST OCA 22.7.72 -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] The present Pgm being worked on is designed to raise the low Trait H point. TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS TO DATE: 38. TOTAL NO. OF HRS IN THE CHAIR TO DATE: 54 hrs 15 min. Compiled by Flag Dn Spec Team Revised by CS-4 Approved by L. RON HUBBARD Founder for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:LRH:RS:MMft.rd.jh Copyright $c 1972, 1974, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 194  Compiled by Flag Dn Spec Team Revised by CS-4 Approved by L. RON HUBBARD Founder for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=22/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 14 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE G  Type = 11 iDate=22/10/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 22 OCTOBER 1972 Remimeo Issued 28 March 1974 Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 22 OCTOBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 14 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE G OCA GRAPH 6.5.72 -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] This pc had come to Flag for an FCCI. (Flag Case Completion Intensive.) She had been audited by a C1 XII Auditor on set-ups and higher level processing. The pc's case level is OT VI. NOTE BY THE CL XII C/S TO LRH -- Dear Sir, The pc has "finished" OT III Exp VGIs, good D of P Interview but OCA down, from what it was after L-9SX. Have done a new Pgm (she wants Dn and Exp Grades before she goes home) and first C/S. Pgm calls for Exp Dn on her L-9S items. Prior to that a repair to catch the ARC Bks (dropped graph). This is OK. LRH COMMENT 7.5.72 -- "OK. (On pgm.) More honest graph really, but ARC Bk rule holds." 195 SET-UP PROGRAM BY CL XII C/S -- 1. Assess: Auditors, auditing, solo, Adv Courses, Flag, Wins. 2. L1C on reading items. 3. M4 for misunderstood words in Auditing. 4. W/Clearing Corr List to F/N List. 5. GF M5 and handle. 6. To Exp Dn Pgm. The above set-up Pgm was done to good result and some longstanding misunderstoods were cleared up on the pc. EXP DN PGM BY DN SPEC 8.5.72 -- Set-up program complete. Has chronic aches and pains to be handled with Exp Dns. 0. Havingness each session. 1. R3R Triple Ev Purps. 2. 2wc PT Environment noting all reads. Take up reading areas. Handle R3R Triple and get any Attitudes and Emotions connected. 3. Emotional Stress White Form -- emphasis on losses. 4. Clear and assess LX3, LX2 then LX1. Handle reading items. R3R Triple. 5. 2wc Body Problems wants handled. Get As, Es and Is connected. R3R Triple. 6. New OCA. Added: Pc discovered terminal PTS to. 7. Triple Ruds. 8. Clear and assess PTS Rundown Corr List and handle. 9. Can't Have Rundown. 10. OCA taken here not at 6. The program is started and completed to Step 2. The pc at Exams says, "I had a beautiful session. I feel so good, so good. I feel identified. So me." AUDITOR'S COMMENTS -- We're really hitting right where she wants handling. Handling long- term failed help and somatics. (Note exam.) She's really winning! (I put her on footplates today, she loves them and no more TA hassles or attention on cans.) LRH -- "Great!" LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done." The next session the WF handling is completed and the LX lists are begun. The pc says at the Examiner, "Everything is alright. So much gone! Not there any more! Just computing. I wouldn't have missed coming to Flag for all the World." 196 AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- The last exam speaks for itself. She's doing very well! LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. You should frame it! You're doing a good job." The next session Step 4 of the program is completed and 5 done. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- She feels that there is nothing else she wants handled. We unblocked her ears among other things. She wants to go home and train and start auditing. She felt handled after yesterday's session. 0. New OCA. 1. D of P Interview. 2. Pending results continue Pgm or Declare Exp Dianetics Complete. LRH COMMENT -- "Hey a Product! Very well done!" Pc declares. Then next day 13.5.72 the Host rushes a note to the C/S. NOTE FROM HOST TO C/S -- (Pc) has just come to me a little griefy with a headache (after completing her Expanded Dns yesterday). She says she knows she is PTS. She says she knows it is not "....." but it may be her CPA (Certified Public Accountant) "....." She itsa'd a bit and remembered he sat on the board of the Mental Health Organization in "....." She started to blow a lot of charge and said she felt it blowing. *I info'd her of the new PL on PTS and finance. She became VGIs and is going to read it. She then recognized that her business and Franchise started to get into trouble when they took him on and said they knew the Business was PTS to Someone. I said I'd info the D of P and C/S and get it handled for her. She went off VGIs to read the PL but came back a few seconds later to say the headache had blown -- I asked her to get a pc Exam (so there is a record of whether the item F/Ned). Please get her cleaned up with Ethics/D of P and further sessions on PTS RD if required. HOST EXAM REPORT AFTER HOST INTERVIEW -- I spotted our CPA as a one dollar a year man. *FOOTNOTE: HCO PL 12 May 72, "PTS PERSONNEL AND FINANCE". 197 Blew my headache. It affected our Business and I'm sure he is the Why. Feel great. TA 2.25 Wide F/N. AUDITOR'S NOTE AND C/S (Also these steps added to the Pgm) -- Her OCA has recovered from its bad dip. She came up to the Host tonight with a terminal she recognized she was PTS to. She feels she's complete on her Exp Dianetics but she should get this last bit of PTSness cleared up. 0. Work out handling for CPA in "....." she's PTS to -- with D of P. 1. Fly all ruds triple + Overts. 2. PTS Rundown Correction List. 3. "Can't Have" Rundown as addition to PTS Rundown. Note: I need more data for Step 3 -- is an HCO B coming out? LRH REPLY 13.5.72 -- "See attached note." *"PTS Steps (Not necessarily in final form). Select the terminals already run on R3R in the sequence they were run in. 1st one, 2nd one, 3rd one, etc. Clear 'Can't Have' 'Couldn't Have' as denial of something to someone else. 'Enforced Have' as making someone accept what they don't want. Have the pc get the idea of these with an example or 2. Run on the SP items a 4 way (each to F/N) bracket. 1. 'What Can't Have did (terminal) run on you?' to F/N. 2. 'What Can't Have did you run on (same terminal)?' 3. 'What did (terminal) force on you you didn't want?' 4. 'What did you try to force on (terminal) that he (she, it) didn't want?' Each goes to F/N. This can also be run alternate repetitive: 1.2.1.2. etc to F/N. 3.4.3.4. etc to F/N. But it may not be cleaned up. The theory is that SPs are SPs because they deny hav and enforce unwanted hav. They also deny do and enforce unwanted do. They also deny be and enforce unwanted be. A very full RD then would be to start with don't be must be, go onto don't do must do, end up with can't have enforced have. *FOOTNOTE: This process and RD is no longer experimental and is covered in HCOB 9 Dec 71RA, "PTS RUNDOWN". 198 *A pc has to be told it is experimental as it is not yet in HCOB. After EACH item handled with the 2 flows can't and 2 flows enforced OBJECTIVE HAV should be run. This is why we have never before been able to run subjective hav. It collided with SPs, overts and w/hs on them. Hav alone (4 bracket) should handle without resorting to Be or Do, but in rough cases, Be and Do will have to come before Hav. End off at once and begin objective Hav if the TA soars or the pc caves in, and send folder to me. A PTS RD can make a clear if fully carried out, accurate in all steps." The pc handles her PTS connection by telexing to have the Accountant fired. The auditor then takes the pc into session to do these further auditing steps. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- The "Can't Have" Rundown is a roaring success with her. We cleaned up every last bit of PTSness in her environment, according to her. It's really incredible to see mass blow off people and get brighter. 0. New OCA. 1. D of P Interview on recent auditing, etc. 2. If all OK Declare Exp Dn Complete. LRH COMMENT 14.5.72 -- "Very well done! Cheers! A good product. Can we do 'em or can't we. C/S okay." In the D of P Interview pc wants to give her Business Associate a further R- Factor concerning the Accountant which she goes off to (.....) to do. While away doing this the pc pulls in an old somatic. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- She's got an old backache at (.....) yesterday -- which needs handling. She also did a new OCA "over a backache" but there are some interesting changes in the graph. She also is winning with the touch assist from the MO. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Touch Assist to a Cog. 3. Sanderson Rundown per Pgm. (Added.) 4. End with havingness. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 17.5.72 -- "I tole you and tole you and tole you -- when they rollercoaster they're PTS OR she has been wearing metal. (Shoes have steel in them, belts, garter belts.) (I just found 'appendicitis' was a party belt studded with metal!) **1. Have the pc stand, look her over for metal, question her about metal stays, girdles she wears or has worn. Find what it is that rests exactly in the somatic areas. *FOOTNOTE: This process and RD is no longer experimental and is covered in HCOB 9 Dec 71 RA, "PTS RUNDOWN". **FOOTNOTE: This is the "Metalosis RD" and will be covered more fully as to theory and application in HCO Bs later in Exp Dn Series. 199 FIND IT past or present. R-Factor: Metal worn on the person can cause your condition. Indicate it. 2. Put her on a meter. L&N 'What metal object have you worn in back area'. Check for read. BD F/N Item. 3. R3R Triple using the item found -- wore a -- or whatever. 4. L&N 'What metal object have you worn -- (Feet, legs, what it is)! BD F/N Item. 5. R3R Triple -- wore (or used) a _______. 6. Hav." The auditor does the C/S. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Sir, you're a genius! This is exactly where she was sitting -- she blew these somatics she thought were "62 yr old somatics". I've never seen something work so fast before. 1. Declare Exp Dn Complete. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. This was the first Metalosis session!" The pc attests Exp Dn Complete and says at the Examiner, "I had the best night's sleep in a long time. I feel great. Also my eyesight has improved 75%." PC'S SUCCESS STORY -- For me Expanded Dianetics is the process that truly enables me to be OT and an active Scientologist. There are no words to really describe the gains I have had. My awareness is up and I have gained that which is necessary to operate truly as an OT. PC'S LAST OCA (Taken before Metalosis) 16.5.72 -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 6. TOTAL NO. OF HRS IN THE CHAIR: 13 hrs 46 min. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.rd for the Copyright$c i972, 1974 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS by L. Ron Hubbard of the ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY 200  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=24/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 15 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE I  Type = 11 iDate=24/10/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 24 OCTOBER 1972 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Issued 28 March 1974 Ex Dn Auditors CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 24 OCTOBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 15 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE I [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES 2.4.72 -- No grade. OCA right side "in the white". Tone range per Chart of Human Evaluation 0.5-1.1. Audited over out-drugs. Drug RD (quickie) declared while pc in a spin. Hot W/F quickie handled. Critical of auditors. Half of sessions BER. One point "didn't need auditing". Tends to self audit. Chronic sickie. Accidents. Ethics (under Comm Ev). Failed on post. Last action W/Cing M1 and 2. EXP DN PROGRAM BY A DN SPEC 2.4.72 -- 0. Pgm to be started after Comm Ev completed, and pc with Ethics OK. "00. Clear ARC Bk and handle LD. WCCL, WC C/S 1 and redo M1 WC." Added by LRH 17.4.72. 1. Clear each word in R3R + on L-3B. Clear commands. 2. Assess PT environment buttons. Get attitudes and emotions, R3R Triple. 3. Assess C1 VIII auditing list, get attitudes and emotions on reading buttons, R3R Triple. "Add LRH" added by LRH 15.4.72. If considerations clear up on auditing and auditors omit Step 4 and go to 5. 4. Clear each word in LXs. Assess LXs "on auditing" R3R Triple then LX2 + LX1 R3R Triple. 5. Clear Drug RD. Reassess Drug list. Handle to a real F/N list. 6. Prior Assessment. 7. New OCA. To be pgmed accordingly. 201 AUDITOR'S FIRST C/S 2.4.72 -- Not to be audited until Comm Ev complete. Last action was W/Cing. Tends to self audit. Calls it confronting. D of P to inform pc that during his Exp Dns Pgm he is to do no more "confronting". 1. D of P step above. 2. Clear each word in R3R and on L-3B. 3. Clear R3R commands. Have him give examples. Have him demo E/S and New Beg. *4. Assess attached PT environment list. 5. Take best reading item, get attitudes and emotions. R3R Triple. 6. Continue attitudes and emotions with reading items, R3R Triple. LRH COMMENT -- "Pgm and C/S OK." The auditor starts the word clearing. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 14.4.72 -- Doing fine. Has a bit of a rough time on words. Still a bit fixated on you. Usually only GIs on F/Ns -- this will improve. He has had and still has a bit of a sore throat. 1. Touch Assist to a cog. 2. Complete clearing R3R and L-3B words. 3. Assess PT environment buttons (attached). Get emotions and attitudes on best reading. 4. R3R Triple. 5. Havingness. Put havingness on Pgm before ending each session. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. You're doing fine. Probably has some overts on me. Not likely to recover until they're off. C/S OK." The auditor does the C/S and continues the word clearing. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 15.4.72 -- Well hey! No wonder. He has M/Us up the kazoo! TA goes low. Overwhelmed on words. He really dug the Touch Assist and Havingness. And he had better inds. Also gave me a compliment. (He's usually super critical.) So no wonder he spun! And has had lots of W/Clearing?!!! I'm pleased with his progress. *FOOTNOTE: PT Environment List is list made up by the auditor of areas in the pc's environment that may be charged. 202 1. Touch Assist to cog. 2. Clear word sensation. 3. Complete clearing L-3B and R3R items. 4. Continue Pgm. LRH COMMENT 16.4.72 -- On Auditor's C/S "Very well done. There's something wrong with his WCing. If he bogs we do a WC Corr List. Ha, I know what it is. He had a WC Corr List over Mis/U wds on the list. Needs verifying but I'll bet his WCing is out but list won't detect." On separate note "Very well done. That's a very bright observation. Check his folders for the WC Corr List of 25 Jan 72 (not available to me at this hour). I'll bet anything it F/Ned because he doesn't understand the words on it. This would make a completion that COULD HAVE BEEN AN ARC BRK NEEDLE ON THE WCCL ASSMT! AND AT EXAMINER! Complete the list you are working on as per your C/S. Then look at the 25 Jan session. At 1A we will do, if this looks like he didn't really get his WCing corrected, clear WCCL words and assess and correct before we plunge into any more chains at 2 of Pgm. He's been audited too much to be so ill. So there's a case bug -- as above." The auditor spends the next session clearing up one word and ends with Havingness "Feel that". AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 16.4.72 -- Words is really where he is. We went on huge chain 3 1/2 hrs to clear sensation! I looked at that WCCL 25 Jan 72 -- doesn't seem he answered 2 of the questions -- just said yeh F/N -- GIs exam -- 27 Jan 72 another WCCL, only tick handled, looks on last Q pc didn't understand, said yes then no, and got F/N and then 8RR F/Ned -- No comment! -- at exams GIs, declare Q asked -- comm lag - yeh small F/N ok inds. 3 Feb 72 bogs on M2. WCCL done, probable M/Us. 7 Feb 72 Red tab declare on WCCL, get re-exam after some M2 and declares. So his WCing IS BAD -- you were so correct. I would like to change Pgm a bit to clear all words on WCCL and WC C/S 1 -- then WCCL -- then verify or complete M1. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 17.4.72 -- On Auditor's C/S "Very well done. Your original observation found this. He must have been ARC Brk F/Ning on the original actions." On separate sheet "Very well done. 203 You found the original clue to all this. So he must have been doing an ARC Brk F/N on earlier WCCLs. This means he's been run, possibly, over an ARC Brk. Gives him his 'sad effect'. Possible Ethics action on the earlier M1 'completion'. So this pc is held down only by words. With tons of auditing, not knowing the words, he's never been audited! Means no one ever cleared commands on him. Thus he's a 'chronic case'. This is a classic really of what we're achieving and how. 1. Clear ARC Brk, carefully. 2. Check for ARC Brk LONG DURATION. 3. Clear word chain. 4. Clear all words on WCCL & WC C/S 1. 5. WCCL. 6. W/Clear M1 verified as complete." The auditor does the C/S successfully. WCing is continued for 7 sessions with good results. However in the next session the pc gets sad and red tabs at the Examiner. Pc statement, "I was kind of uncertain about just which words I didn't U well enough." AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 21.4.72 -- ARC Brk at exam. Pc in sad effect. Not sure on words (which are M/U) bogging a bit. He needs WCCL but that's what I'm trying to clear words for. Probably resolve on ARC Brk. 1. Fly ARC Brk Rud and "In your last session" ARC Brk Rud. (I cleared those words.) 2. Clear PTP and M/W/H, fly each and each as "In your last session". 3. Clear words fraternity, lodge, society, into, develop, form, thematic, motif, cycle, wavelength, thetan, static. 4. Complete clearing words on WCCL and C/S 1 for M1. 5. M1 verified or completed. 6. Hav. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 22.4.72 -- "Too bad. I see what's going wrong here. You're not WClearing over in-Ruds. And not getting an F/N amongst the words. TA went up on FASTEN. After that (pg 4) he got dopey and you didn't grab what he'd really not understood. Also the long haul of this, if no F/Ns, will move him back into IMPLANTS as these contain words, mass and force. F/N is a sign of RELEASE. But from what? Look up the word. If no Release then no F/N. If no F/N no release. Your C/S won't handle because it's BPC stirred up and that responds to handling. 1. Were there some words you were not sure about last session? 2wc E/S to F/N. 2. Have we by-passed a win? Rehab. 3. Fly all ruds Triple. 204 4. 2wc Describe your condition to me. E/S to F/N. 5. What have you wanted handled in auditing? Send folder up with BD statements circled in green. (Red is for R/Ses and Evil Purps and Serv Facs.)" The auditor does the complete C/S the next session. AUDITOR'S COMMENT (NO C/S) 22.4.72 -- Here is result of your C/S. Lots of reads and some B/Ds. He really liked it. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done by Exams. Good but no C/S. Needs Pgm and C/S. Danger Condition assigned auditor as I had to bypass last session and being asked to this session again. No Danger Cond Habits please." AUDITOR'S PROGRAM 23.4.72 -- Has big trouble with words. Words not taken to F/N. Ruds not put in. Has funny indicators on F/Ns. Hav after each session -- Ruds each session. 1. Clear F/N. 2. 2wc "What would have to happen for you to F/N?" 3. Clear backload of words from previous session (that did not F/N). 4. Clear words on WCCL and WC C/S 1. 4a. WCCL and handle. 5. WC M1 (or verify). Add: TRs, auditing, galley. 6. WC 8RR and WCCL to F/N list. 7. Tech Div Primary RD. (Can be done part-time during Exp Dn.) 8. Pgm for Exp Dns. AUDITOR'S C/S 23.4.72 -- I re-programmed him for Exp Dn set-up. Got to get words handled. He has funny inds sometimes on F/Ns like it's not great enough for him to have an F/N. 1. Fly all Ruds. 2. Clear F/N. 3. 2wc "What would have to happen for you to F/N?" (Mark all BDs, Fs, R/Ses, etc.) 4. Step 3 Pgm. 5. Step 4 Pgm. LRH COMMENT -- "Pgm OK and C/S OK." The C/S is done and WCing is continued for three sessions. On 26.4.72 in session (on page 10 of the Worksheet) the auditor is clearing the word "confused" and the pc says, "I don't feel bad about 'confused' but don't feel good about something -- word 'clearing' that's what it is." The auditor clears this word. 205 Later on page 20 & 21 of the Worksheet the auditor is clearing the word "sent". The pc says, "I know what it means." Auditor, "M/U?" Pc, "Nope. Laugh, yeh I don't know what it means, I try to convince you, laugh." The auditor continues and clears it. The 26.4.72 session ends on an F/N and an F/N exam. The next session again WCing the pc red tabs at Examiner. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 27.4.72 -- Pc had a sore throat so ended session and took him in later. Hard going. Pc had considerations how he should feel, how long it should last, how should be done. But actual bog was ARC Brk with his being considered Ethics and chronic sickie. He's worried about status and being expelled. Decided he should get status made certain by Chaplain. (Doesn't get on with MO.) Since bits of this have come up before I want it handled before I continue auditing him. Main problem in TA was it was over ARC Brk. 0. Pc to get status verified with Chaplain. When pc satisfied: 1. Fly all ruds. 2. Complete Step 4 of Pgm. 3. Continue Pgm. LRH COMMENTS AND C/S 28.4.72 -- On Auditor's C/S "Well Done by Exams. Didn't get his Ruds in fully or you'd have made it." On separate sheet "You didn't get ruds in. Pc was not in comm. You don't run Ruds any old way and you MUST NOT CLEAR WORDS OVER A SOARING TA. I just sent down a C/S the other day TO YOU 22 Apr 72 same pc ordering you to get an F/N between words. On 26 Apr pg 20 & 21 of earlier session words got out of sequence. Pc was actually out rud, protesting session." (LRH had ringed "I try to convince you, laugh" in green on the worksheet and written "protest".) "Earlier on pg 10 he's skipping about amongst words. (Confused becomes Clearing.) *The cause of all this weird action in the session is on the earliest pg 8 26 April where the ARC Brk got 2 reads and you didn't reassess. Pgm outness -- Clearing backlog of words was a Pgm error that left us without a cleared WCCL now needed. The general outness is trying to audit someone on Ethics lines in some way. *FOOTNOTE: The auditor had assessed ARCU and gotten a sF on both C and U and had indicated U instead of reassessing. 206 *Your suggestion is correct. To get it handled by someone acting as Chaplain -- probably Host. But there are errors here of an auditing nature. Moving to a new room, pc's attn. Not catching protest. 0. Chaplain Interview. 1. L1C Recently. 2. WCCL M5. Handle." HOSTS REPORT -- I interviewed (_______ pc) as requested. The situation was pretty much all handled by him as he went on his own determinism and spoke to the Chaplain/MO last night after session. He was concerned that the MO had a worse opinion of his medical history than was in fact the case. He felt that as the MO had a big say in whether he is offloaded or not -- this was an uncool situation. The MO gave him the R-Factor that it is a combination of bad MO history and no production that gives offload. This brought in his GIs as he felt he was able to produce and hold his own and his status as a SO Member was no longer in danger because of someone else's opinion. Says it's all handled. GIs. The auditor spends two sessions handling the WCCL. It seems nicely cleaned up so auditor suggests going back to WCing and Pgm. However before the next session the pc reports to the Examiner: "Sprained my ankle at exercises -- scorched my hands on the gravel, going to be hard going up and down stairs," 4.4.4.0 (pc limps out). Auditor grabs him and gives him a Touch Assist. Pc red tabs at the Examiner (TA 3.5). AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 2.5.72 -- Sprained ankle -- scraped hand -- limping. I can't put him on footplates as he has bandage on foot and he can't hold cans very well in one hand -- so he's a bit false TA now. Touch Assist went very well. 1. Touch Assist. 2. Hav. (Repeated later in the day if needed.) LRH COMMENT 3 May 72 -- On Auditor's C/S "OK. But this cat is PTS!!!!!" On separate sheet "Proceeding well but: *FOOTNOTE: The Chaplain's hat is worn by the MO who the pc does not get along with. 207 Has himself an accident. He is obviously PTS as he roller coastered. Add PTS Check to Pgm. Your C/S of touch assist and Hav is okay." The touch assist was given and pc's foot getting better. The Word Clearing is continued with a touch assist being given each session to a win. The WCing is continued for several sessions. After the session on 7.5.72 the pc comes to the Examiner and says, "Feel alright about that," 2.5 F/N Normal. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 7.5.72 -- Almost done. 1. Fly all Ruds "+ overts Triple" added by LRH. 2. Complete clearing WCCL and 8RR. 3. Hav. LRH COMMENTS -- "Very well done. He seemed a bit dull at Exams = Heavy on ruds next session." The next session the auditor completes clearing the WCCL and WC C/S 1. The pc is sent to the D of P for a PTS Check. However before he has it an EstO grabs him and does some Product Clearing on him. He goes to the Examiner the next morning and says, "(_______ EstO) did some Product Clearing on me last night. I didn't feel very good about it. Probably had a misunderstood word," 2.4 D/N. That day the PTS Check is done and D/Ns at the Examiner. This arrives back with the auditor who has to spend two sessions clearing up the botched Product Clearing, and then starts in on clearing up M/Us on the PTS materials. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 17.5.72 -- Put Ethics in on him. Saw him reading Science Fiction book when he has "no" time and can't get through PTS materials. Told him to get through fast and keep Ethics in OR NO AUDITING. He could wait. This came when I found him not doing it during his study and auditing hrs. After completing PTS materials. 1. Fly all ruds. 2. M/U on PTS materials. 3. Fly all ruds on PTS. 4. Complete PTS Check. LRH COMMENT 18.5.72 -- "Very well done. Now hear this. You did very well getting his Out-Ethics spotted. WITH this you opened the door to a resolution of a sticky case. He's no good to man or beast and will get no case gain with his Ethics out. That isn't all he's doing (loafing during study). Now he is on one RD (PTS) and we find another needed. So we can't switch RDs. So we add it to Pgm right after what we're doing. Standard Op Procedure. 208 So redo this Pgm (it's messy anyway). Put in 3 May 72 PL by the auditor (has 2 Lists L&N in it) and handle. We should have done 3 May 72 PL before the PTS RD. Your C/S is okay." The auditor continues the clearing of words to do with PTS Check and then completes the PTS Check. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 21.5.72 -- All it took was clearing the materials -- so he knew what was going on. Then went very well. He began to make a sort of a list so I will be alert for out-lists. He is not ready for PTS RD. I doubt if I could clear all the words on the L-3B and R3R in 25-50 hrs. So that's why Prim RD. Then I'll get him moving on Exp Dn. 1. Clear all words and do HCO PL 3 May 72. L&N the two lists. 2. Havingness. AUDITOR'S NEW PROGRAM 21.5.72 -- Is PTS. Needs PTS RD but not set up. Still big problem with words. Is Out-Ethics most of the time. 1. 3 May 72 PL. L&N two lists. 2. Method 1 verified or completed -- add: TRs, auditing, galley. 3. Tech Div Primary RD. 4. Pgm on Exp Dns (including PTS RD as soon as set up). LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Yes (to C/S and Pgm)." The auditor has trouble with high TA and spends several sessions clearing the list and getting it assessed and F/Ning. The pc is by this time on the Primary RD and the auditor spends time each session clearing up M/Us. AUDITOR'S COMMENT 2.6.72 -- May I have OK for him not to do Prim RD part-time. I end up using session time cleaning up his M/Us. 1. Fly all ruds. 2. Clear L-4B words. 3. 3 May PL. 4. Hav. Then to Dept 13 for M1. He has been on lines too long with no production sight, until words straightened out. LRH COMMENT 2.6.72 -- "Very well done. Finish up 3 May 72 quickly. Then we can tell. Off Primary RD until 3 May done and M1 done. OK. (By auditor's note re Dept 13.)" 209 The next three sessions the auditor spends clearing words on L-4B and up to Step 2 of the 3 May PL. The next session the pc is found to be unsessionable. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 6.6.72 -- Gee -- it took me 11 mins to find him unsessionable. He slept 6, layed around 3 and was tired! I told him 8 hrs tomorrow and sessionable or else. I am tired of this, he causes me too much Dev-T. "R-Factor: We are getting your Ethics in as you are in Danger of offload," added by LRH. 1. Fly all ruds. 2. Complete 3 May PL. 3. Hav. LRH COMMENT -- "OK. See addition." The auditor finishes the 3 May. AUDITOR'S COMMENT 7.6.72 -- 3 May PL done. I want him to get PRD before I do Exp Dns. He is not sick. Words is his main scene. 1. D of P Int. Inform pc before he gets Exp Dns he must do Prim RD. That he will be going to Dept 13 first for WCing. When he has finished Prim RD he can have Exp Dns. 2. To Dept 13. M1 verified or completed. To date the pc has not resumed his Exp Dn program. No after-intensive graph was given. The above case history shows what may be necessary to get a pc ready for Exp Dn. TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 33. TOTAL HOURS IN THE CHAIR: 85 hrs 17 min. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 210  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=25/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 16 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE J  Type = 11 iDate=25/10/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 25 OCTOBER 1972 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Issued 28 March 1974 Ex Dn Auditors CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 25 OCTOBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 16 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE J OCA GRAPH -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES AND EXPANDED DIANETIC PROGRAM BY EXP DN SPEC -- She's OT IIIX and still easily overwhelmed. She's had very little Dianetics run. Needs her Ev Purps run out R3R Triple. Falsely high OCA. Reported still misemotional on work and study. 0. Clear all words in L3ExD & R3R. 1. C/S 1. 2. Run all Ev Purps in L10 R3R Triple. 3. 2wc PT Environment, note all BD items. 4. Take up BD items in 3 and get intentions and emotions connected -- R3R Triple. 4a. Run the Goals Processing out -- R3R Triple narrative. 4b. Handle intentions connected. 5. Assess C/S 6 get intentions connected -- R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 6. Emotional Stress White Form -- handle emotional stress R3R Triple. 7. Clear and assess LX3 -- handle R3R Triple. 8. Clear and assess LX2 -- handle R3R Triple. 9. Clear and assess LX1 -- handle R3R Triple. PROGRAM STARTED 28.4.72 -- Pc finishes her C/S 1 and the L10 Evil Purposes are checked and turn out "no interest" and PT Environment is started. AUDITOR'S COMMENT 29.4.72 -- She told me a couple of times how she didn't like running Dns because it was "slow" -- but she sure blew a lot of grief charge on what we ran today. 211 LRH COMMENT -- "VERY WELL DONE. She is dispersed so has to work fast and frantically." PT Environment is completed. Pc has been continually mentioning 25 hrs of Goals Processing she received. 4a is added to the program. Next session auditor completes the rest of the program, most of it turns out "no interest". AUDITOR'S C/S AND COMMENT 30.4.72 -- We ran out her Goals Processing but it's not handled yet. She says she can handle anything but that area and she tends to not-is it in and out of session. She also got bored in session -- I checked ARC Brks (didn't check PTP & MWH). Turned out later to be a MWH concerning the fact that the area had not gone yet. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Havingness. 3. Get what intention would make one hold onto Goals Processing. 4. Run best reading item R3R Triple. 5. Recheck interest on White Form and LX lists. LRH COMMENT AND C/S -- "WELL DONE. (C/S would get her messed up as it's an out-list situation really an engram but she has attention on it.) 0. L4B Method 5. 'On your goals list _______.' 00. Handle. Do your C/S. She is rather critical. More withholds than that, I think. Also get in the who what did he do steps of M W/Hs when you meet a MW/H." Upper class auditor does list correction. L4B of above C/S only. AUDITOR'S COMMENT -- Seems like she might have blown the thing on her goals list at last. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 2.5.72 -- "Thank you, Very Well Done. Back to _______ for Exp Dn. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. (6 of Pgm) Emotional Stress White Form. 3. Handle emotional stresses R3R Triple. 4. Havingness." Auditor does the above C/S and continues with LX's. AUDITOR'S C/S AND COMMENTS -- I don't know about this one. She's making gains -- they are quite apparent but she just gets bored stiff and dopey during Dianetics. "It's too slow." There's something holding her viewpoint of Dianetics in place. So: 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. L3ExD Rundown to F/Ning list. 3. If all OK continue LX1. 4. Havingness. 212 LRH COMMENT AND C/S AND PROGRAM 4.5.72 -- "Well done. We've strayed off the rails here. Tired, dopey = stuck in something or failed purpose. I see we've not run her L10 Ev Purps. 0. Touch Assist. 1. 2wc What do you want handled? Note BD F/N items. 2. Hav. See Pgm. PROGRAM Not really responding. Like to feel tired and dopey. Probably out ethics. Plenty touch assists and havingness: 1. LRH C/S of 4 May 72 What do you want handled? 2. Intentions connected to it L&N. R3R Triple. 3. Want handled? Intentions R3R Triple. 4. Want handled? Intentions R3R Triple. 5. L10 Ev Purps Interest or no interest. Pgm then as needed. C/S 53RRR if another BER. Then May 3, 72 P/L." Auditor does above LRH C/S. Pc doesn't want anything handled, but mentions quite a few different things (see next LRH Pgm). LRH COMMENT, C/S AND PROGRAM 5.5.72 -- "Well done. She says she objects to slow auditing indirectly by saying she likes it fast. There are things to be handled. SHE IS NOT IN SESSION. 1. 2wc Who would I have to be to audit you. 2. What are you willing to talk to me about. 2a. GF Method 5 Handle. 3. Method 4 on 'Early words in auditing'. Clean each to F/N. 4. Havingness. PROGRAM Doesn't like auditing. 'Feeling slightly abnormal.' 'Space not totally clean' BD. 'Auditing would be an overt' LFBD. 'Don't feel deserve auditing.' Lots of Havingness. A missing piece of Sanderson Rundown -- get her in session! 1. LRH C/S 5 May 72 (to get in session and get GF & early Mis U's on auditing handled). 2. 'Auditing as an overt' R3R Triple. Check 'Abnormal' for a read R3R Triple. 3. Get intentions re Space L&N. R3R Triple on item. 3a. Huge black mass orbiting around head Intention on, L&N. Added by LRH6.5.72. 4. 2wc on what she wants handled. 5. Handle with intention and R3R Triple." 213 Auditor did steps 1, 2, 2a of LRH C/S. Pc mentions black mass circling round head. Pc has some tremendous wins on clearing up some misunderstood words. Auditor's C/S is to continue LRH C/S 5.5.72 and Pgm. LRH COMMENT -- "Very Well Done. That's better. The W/S's however adds a step to Pgm that black mass circling around is what she wanted handled. Should have been a suggest here. Bit of a puzzle how to fit it in. But as it's now come up we can tackle it directly. I added it to Pgm. Your C/S is OK. This is a classic Ex Dn session situation you've just handled." Auditor does Method 4 on early words in auditing. The pc goes to the Examiner and says, "It's like everything is back in place where it belongs, it's perfect." Dial F/N VGIs. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- She's a product. All the remaining stuff she wanted handled blew entirely on clearing up these words. 1. Declare EXP DN PGM complete. 2. Finish PRD. The pc attested to Exp Dn complete. SUCCESS STORY 7.5.72 -- My overall win was a complete free Scientology and Dianetics track which goes back 11 years. It's like starting all over again with a lot of know-how. Many, many other wins too. I used to do things thru a screen of somatics and attitudes galore. All gone. Understanding restored and much much more. A 100 thanks to _______ (auditor) and the Commodore. FINAL OCA -- Pc did not take a new OCA at this time. Note. This is an error as an OCA must be taken prior to a pc attesting Exp Dn. TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 11. TOTAL NO. OF HOURS IN THE CHAIR: 19 hrs 25 min. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the BDCS:JH:WS:MM:ntMrd CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 214  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=29/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 17 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE K  Type = 11 iDate=29/10/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 29 OCTOBER 1972 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Issued 28 March 1974 Ex Dn Auditors CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 29 OCTOBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 17 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE K OCA GRAPH -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] Heavily down on the right. (This graph done in Swedish, pc's native language.) CASE NOTES -- Pc Grade 4 quickie. Past bad Dn auditing. Failed attempts to "get him to go whole track". Probably due to misunderstood words. Record of long-term illness, and some violence dramatizations on board. Last ill 27 Mar 72. EXP DN SET-UP PGM BY DN SPEC 16.4.72 -- He has outstanding unhandled and ignored Int Corr Items and Hi-Lo Items. But he has heavy MisUs. Also no-auditing situation since 4. 1.72 (except Product RD). 1. CLEAR ALL WORDS: Ruds, WCCL, and assess WCCL and handle. *2. Clear and assess WC 1 C/S 1 and M1 list and handle to F/N list. 3. IF TA difficulty comes up clear C/S 53RRR and handle. Otherwise continue. *FOOTNOTE: By HCO B 30 June 71, Issue II, Word Clearing Series 8RB (Revised 11 May 72) the list words of M1 are not cleared before assessment. The words of the commands (WC 1 C/S 1) of M1 may be cleared. 215 3a. PTS Check (added later). 4. To Exp Dn Program. EXP DN PROGRAM BY DN SPEC 16.4.72 -- 0. Havingness -- throughout, before and after session. Oa. Clear words: R3R, L-3XD. 1. Assess PT Environ buttons, get E, A or S on them. R3R Triple exhaust lists. 2. Assess C/S-6 (VIII list) -- add.- Past Lives, Commands, Chains, "Product RD", etc. Get Sen, Emotions or Attitudes, R3R Triple, exhaust lists. 3. "Emotional Stresses" WF. (Get any treatments, if "Attitude to treatment" reads, and get AES on them (i.e. the treatments). Likewise "attitudes to illness".) 4. Based on WF bleed it of all emotional charge -- all emotions/attitudes on reading areas or Narrative as applicable. 5. Then new OCA to check the left aide and program as indicated. PROGRAM STARTED 17.4.72 -- The word clearing goes OK when a simple dictionary is used. On the WCCL pc starts to have problems about his post. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 20.4.72 -- Has a problem getting free to be audited -- caught between product pressure and watch duty. Handled PTP in mid session again. Assessment of WCCL mainly over still needle, not F/Ning, not reading. Exams was OK. May have been my TR 1 but I thought that was OK. 0. Hav to F/N. 1. Fly all ruds. 2. Reassess WCCL and handle to F/Ning list. 3. Clear and handle W/C C/S 1 (M1) to F/Ning list. LRH COMMENT -- "Study this case. Something wrong. PTS? Problem? You can do C/S but resolve the odd behavior." AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S NEXT SESSION 21.4.72 -- After a lot of work on ruds and several assessments of WCCL it came down to a clean list again. Pc has continuous attention on senior (_______) LF and QM (_______) sF. Page 4, col 1 and 2, restraining himself. TA sinks, partly due to sweaty hands. Also is very heavy on "don't know so better not say anything" and "if you can't prove it, keep your mouth shut". (0.5 BD) He also has earlier connections to newspapers and a mental hospital where he worked as a nurse's aide. Has had "insulin treatment" but not specified if simply for diabetes or for shock purposes. 216 He should have a thorough PTS Check immediately after M1 Verification is completed. As he has some protest on doing the WCCL assessment so many times and as the last reads handled were all false or "nothing" reads we may be cleaning cleans on him. 0. Hav to F/N. 0a. 2wc Attention on? to F/N. 1. Find out what he does during an assessment with 2wc to F/N. 1a. Put in Suppress and Inval "On the list we have been assessing". 2. Complete C/S of 20.4.72. Add PTS Check to program after M1 Verification at 3a. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 22.4.72 -- "Very well done. Now we're getting somewhere. Major points: 1. He is psychotic by OCA. 2. He is not in session. 3. His background is at mixed practices (one of 7 Resistive Cases). So reprogram needed. 1. Who would I have to be to audit you? 2wc to F/N. 2. What wouldn't you mind talking to me about? 3. Define Suppressive Person. Mark any BDs. 4. Have you ever known a Suppressive Person? (Mark BD or F/N Items.) 5. Define a Suppressive thing, get examples, mark any BDs. 6. Have you ever known a Suppressive thing? (Mark BD or F/N Items.) 7. Send to D of P for handling as indicated." LRH PROGRAM 22.4.72 -- "Not in sess. Low left OCA. Former Nurse's aide in mental home. Insulin treatment. Not a good case gain. In Ethics trouble often. Foreign language. Lots of Hav. 1. Who'd have to be to audit -- What cd you say. 2. 2wc Define suppressive person or thing with examples until he understands it. 3. 2wc (mark BD or F/N Items). Have you known a suppressive person. 4. 2wc Have you known a suppressive thing. 5. D of P PTS Check metered and handle. (He may be suppressive.) 6. Sanderson RD. 7. Intentions of past areas. Scout int and run." The auditor does the above C/S and gets good LFBD items. Also an R/S turns on periodically through the session. AUDITOR'S C/S AND COMMENTS 22.4.72 -- Wow. We got him where he lived. Best items are: 1. The Head Nurse at the clinic (who ordered the ECTs). 217 2. A commie writer. 3. The ECT machine (not pc's wording here). 4. (_______ Org terminal.) He had no more answers but not an F/N on the "Have you ever known" Qs. 1. D of P Check for anything in PT Environment, or other answers on PTS Check. Light touch as he has answered the Q. 2. PTS handling (D of P). 3. Clear R3R and L-3ExDn words. 4. Sanderson RD. Doesn't seem to be SP himself -- he has thought of it. Long itsa on "artistic ambitions" as a writer at end of session. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. You're getting him where he lives now." The pc has his D of P Interview but no other SP is found. The pc disconnects from three of the SPs found in the session except the Org terminal which is left. In the Interview the pc talks about chronic PTP he has had for almost two years about his attention stuck on going to see his parents that he hasn't seen for five years. The auditor takes him into session but he continues to talk about this problem with the TA rising, to 4.4. The auditor ends off and the pc goes to the Examiner and F/Ns at 3.0. The auditor C/Ses for a C/S 53RRR. LRH COMMENT 23.4.72 -- "Well done by exams. C/S OK. But something is really out. The C/S 53RRR will find if you ask what the reads are before acting." The auditor takes the pc in and clears and assesses the C/S 53RRR. W/H LFBDs, and the auditor begins to handle. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 24.4.72 -- Well we got another big chunk. He had been sitting on the discreditable W/H of having been in the hospital (as well as working in it) for a rest cure following nervous collapse as a student! In terror that the SP head nurse would slip something in his food. And since then afraid of what SO would think. Apparently received only light insulin treatment, not as shock type dosage. I spent some time looking for an overt of commission in the hospital but the read finally cleared to F/N VGIs on "false". This is material for R3R of first order. 1. Continue C/S 53RRR to F/Ning list. 2. Clear all wds R3R and L3ExD. 3. Then to Sanderson RD. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. C/S OK." The auditor continues the C/S 53RRR again pulling W/Hs. 218 AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 25.4.72 -- Wow. 2 more W/Hs on the mental hospital. 1. Forced to go into agreement with psychiatrist on threat of being interned if he spoke out. 2. Fear of expulsion for being connected with psychiatrist. 3. 3rd flow engrams of torture by ECT (for political reasons) of a girl. These all drove TA up and were pulled to F/N VGIs. Still needs to complete C/S 53RRR. 1. Hav to F/N. 2. Assess and handle C/S 53RRR to F/N list. 3. Clear R3R and L-3ExDn terms. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Wild scene! You handled it well. He looks good." The C/S 53RRR is continued for several sessions until it F/Ns all the way through the list. Next session the auditor starts the Sanderson RD. The pc says he wants "masturbation" handled. The TA goes high so auditor handles with a C/S 53RRR. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 2.5.72 -- Ran into another high TA so did C/S 53RRR to F/N list and then did C/S (not complete). 1. Each rud to F/N. 2. Hav to F/N. 3. List intentions connected with masturbation. 4. R3R Triple to F/N list. 5. Repeat 3 and 4 on "get clear". Note: This C/S varies from Sanderson RD by omitting L&N and using Dianetic listing instead. This is because L&N is out of class for me as yet. Should handle it but the long way. LRH COMMENT 3.5.72 -- "Well done. C/S very not correct." LRH rings No. 4 of the auditor's C/S and puts "makes no sense". LRH NOTES AND C/S 3.5.72 -- "Well done. C/S alter-ised from Sanderson RD. You would have listed anyway and gotten a wrong item. You just flew his ruds. He had one R/S. The Ev Purp lives under that R/S. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Hav. 3. L&N What Intention is connected with masturbation. To BD F/N Item. 4. R3R Triple. 5. Hav. 219 Next session again repeat: 2wc want handled L&N Intention R3R Hav You better just learn to L&N before this session time. HGC auditors are supposed to audit anything. Don't get a wrong item." The auditor begins the LRH C/S. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 3.5.72 -- L&N went fine. Started R3R by grabbing a narrative of the subject instead of the intention. On TR 3ing the F-1 (command 1) he took a look and blew himself out of his head -- a sudden and very amazed looking pc. 0. If any TA trouble do Int Corr List and handle (clear words first). 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Hav to F/N. 3. F-2, F-3 and check F-1 or R3R from last session. 4. 2wc "want handled". (Mark BD Items.) 5. L&N "Intention connected with _______". 6. R3R Triple. LRH COMMENT -- "Well done. Control it better On a C/S. Results are fine." The next morning the pc comes to the Examiner and says, "I have a pain in my neck and I want to get an assist -- terrific pain, I could hardly get up this morning." 3.3 clean BIs. The auditor took him back in to repair the list, and spends 4 hours trying to clean it up. At the end of the day the pc Red tags. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 5.5.72 -- Took him in after he BER'd on orig to Exams following list and Ext. C/S 53RRR and L-4B and corrected the list successfully. Then after dinner TA back up again and not certain of item. L-4B and C/S 53RRR and list corr done and list extended and nulled. TA remained high. His back was giving him considerable pain towards end of session. As I wasn't getting the list handled and it was getting to be a heavy PTP I ended off and sent him to MO for a touch assist and attention to the knotted muscle. He now has Red tabbed at Exams and his list, physical PTP and possible Int gone out. 0. Med attention to muscle until no longer a problem. 1. Assess C/S 53RRR, handle per reads. Handle to F/N list. 220 LRH COMMENT -- "Why'd you keep fooling with it after it F/Ned. Repair it." The next session the auditor repairs the list to VGIs and continues the Sanderson RD. Two sessions later the auditor again in trouble with the TA soaring. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Out of the pc's gradient. No R level where the L&N would hit so it didn't read and TA climbed. Overcharged as he puts his TA up in a few seconds with a weird thought like session should be truthful" and sits on it for an hour. So he's overcharged, can't spot bank and stuck down the track this lifetime. He has had CCHs I-IV and Op Pro by Dup (to F/N VGIs). But we can undercut this case with: 1. Tone 40 locational CCH 6. 2. CCH 7 (8c) "Keep it from going away". 3. CCH 8 "Hold it still". 4. CCH 9 "Make it a little more solid". 5. Control TRIO (Notice that _______ and get the idea of having it, permitting it to continue, making it disappear.) This is a program change to get him out of his stuck bank points (Swedish Army, hospital, etc) and under control as he is not cutting it and I am over-restimulating him too easily with too many hours to just get the TA down. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 9 May 72 -- "Well done. You're going off Exp Dn. This pc is w/hing heavily for fear he will damage something or do something evil. See Psychosis HCO B. That is why TA soars on a thought. He's just messed up by Evil Intentions not handled. His session pgming is a bit ragged. He's a TA battle because he isn't leveling with you. Note that Sanderson RD is not complete. You would be breaking into an existing action. You are getting desperate because the pc is in a desperate state. That's the time to go easy, not make a huge change. This pc is already too long on our lines without a completion. If he's not telling you his thoughts he's not in session. You don't have his confidence. 1. 2wc What are you afraid you might tell me? to F/N. Note the BD and F/N items for future reference. 1a. Hav. 2. Verify intention found and R3R Triple. *FOOTNOTE: This was the intention found in the previous session, on the Sanderson step. 221 3. 2wc What have you always wanted handled? 4. Hav." LRH PROGRAM 9.5.72 -- "Pc not really in session. Probably a PT Out-Ethics case. Middle of Sanderson RD. Beware of out lists. High TA needs to be nudged with 'What have you thought of you haven't told me'. 1. LRH C/S 9 May to get pc in session, and complete RD he is started on. 2. Complete Sanderson RD. 3. What destructive thing might you do? 4. Intention behind that. R3R. 5. Repeat 3. 6. Repeat 4. Reprogram." The auditor does the C/S as far as verifying the pc's item. Pc says item that gave previous session is cool but gives the item as "To have something to do rather than eating carrots or picking my teeth or my nose," LFBD F/N. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- One of us is mad, I think. Beginning of session 2 div BD on masturbation. 2wc BD 2 divs on wanting to get the show on the road (for LRH) before time runs out. On verifying the list I div BD on being bored and the matter is handled and feels free about it. Then he comes up with a 0.5 BD and F/N Item which sounds like Alice's Bad Dream. I ended off because I wasn't prepared to rn the item R3R. My impression of this item was covert blow. As far as I can see it has to be. 1. Reclear L4B. 2. Assess and handle L-4B "intention connected to masturbation". 3. Complete last C/S (LRH of 9.5.72). LRH COMMENT AND C/S 11.5.72 -- "Here is a new Pgm and auditor not following it again. It is the correct Pgm. The auditor is critical of pc's item. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. R-Factor. If you think of something you can tell me. When you don't tell me what you think it upsets the processing. 3. R3R on Item found. 4. Hav." The auditor attempts the C/S unsuccessfully. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Immediately after 2wc to F/N and R-Factor his TA soared. Came down on several areas but climbed again after each one. 222 He maintains he is not aware of W/Hing anything yet he has soaring TA on something. Not O/R or protest. I didn't go into the R3R chain due to the high TA. I believe there is some W/H he is not-ising so heavily he doesn't believe he has one. He F/Ned at Exams after high TA in session which is odd. I am unsure how to get him off it so we can do the RD. If it does not violate the program I would suggest Hi-Lo TA List. (Or some other assessment prepared.) 1. Clear Hi-Lo words and assess and handle to F/N list. 2. R3R Triple (item from L&N done previously). 3. Hav. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 13.5.72 -- "Auditors who don't do LRH C/Ses have been known to get very wet. Looks like a simple case of false TA with pc slackening cans. Do you watch a pc's hands? They sometimes slacken cans. If you keep nagging him he'll get desperate. 1. False TA HCO B with all additions. Let's see if you can do all the checks. 1a. Do Hi-Lo if no joy in 1. 2. He wants masturbation handled. That's where it began to hang up. L&N Who or what would masturbate? Item O/W. (Item O/W is: What has item done What has item w/h alternate repetitive.) If no blow, L&N What intention would (_______ item) have. R3R intention." The next session the auditor has again high TA troubles. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- False TA checklist done. Put him on foot plates as there was almost a div of TA difference when he first tried them. As it later climbed back up it was probably just his shoes being taken off. Hi-Lo Assessed 3 times, last time to the pc. No reads. Per his statements he was getting the commands. As if he is below the reality of W/Hing. States he has had a personality change recently and is "more exterior to himself'. This is the second time I have failed to complete a C/S. I did not want to go into another action with the TA that high. He said he was feeling great not tired. (His sleep is irregular due to QM duties.) The pattern is usually the TA doesn't start to climb until the first 20 minutes of the session or so. We should be able to handle this way: 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Complete LRH C/S of 12.5.72. I don't know where I am erring on this guy, but I'll get him through it. 223 LRH COMMENT AND C/S 13.5.72 -- "Oh well. With this many session errors you won't make it. ANYBODY CAN AUDIT AN EASY PC. AN AUDITOR'S FLAWS SHOW UP GLARINGLY ONLY ON ROUGH PCS. As a Dn Spec will be auditing a lot of rough pcs he has to be flawless in TRs, metering and tech. The errors are obvious enough. 1. You don't begin a major action or an assessment list until you get an F/N. This is called set up. One has to know how to talk a TA down to do a Hi-Lo. This holds true unless Int is out and that can be tested at once by simply checking Went In? Exterior? at which you get a BD if it's what's wrong and you just handle it. If it's not Int you check lists. If not lists you check w/hs. Actually I can't see how you'd get much of a read with a TA that high. Nevertheless a C/S 53RRR works even with a high TA. 2. You tried to run an ARC Brk with a high TA. You checked it. You NEVER touch ARC Brks on a High TA as High TA is not caused by ARC Brks. And ARC Brks WILL NOT get a TA down and seriously messes up a pc if you try it. 3. You are possibly assessing with a lilt -- a _______/ upswing of tone as in a question. Assessments are done as a statement _______ a down tone. [See footnote p. 229] \ 4. You have to have the pc's attention. He has to be in session, this means interested in own case and willing to talk to the auditor. 5. To be in session a pc has to have confidence in his auditor and an auditor with overts on the pc or doubts or who makes funny cracks about the pc's items SHOWS IT IN SESSION and there goes confidence. Because ARC is gone. 6. An auditor's tiny failures in TRs begin a grating on the pc. This throws a pc out of session. 7. The commonest cause of no item on an assessed list of prepared items is meter reading failure. The meter is placed wrongly so the auditor can't see it, pc and paper in ONE glance. This is the usual reason for 'no items' on a prepared list. Eyesight can be a factor. 8. An auditor has to have IMPINGEMENT on a pc to assess. The XIIs run into this all the time. Internes have 'done' a GF40XRR. The pc gets to the XII. The XII reassesses and has a whole big parade of reads. The lower class auditor just didn't impinge (or missed the lot). There are NO pcs alive such as you are presenting here in this folder. They do not exist. Whenever in the past, we have thought one did we checked it out and there was no such animal. There was an auditor whose TRs were poor, who couldn't or didn't read a meter and who had overts on the pc. The pc in question each time responded easily to standard auditing. 224 You keep not doing C/Ses because you have not done the basic things. Anyone can run a Cadillac pc. It takes a real smooth auditor to handle a Vintage Model T Ford. These are not harsh words. I must not let you get the idea that you can goof and then blame the pc. You'll just go on losing if I do let it slide. Did you really check ALL of the False TA items or did you just shrug it off and grab footplates? And are you using a meter that works or a busted one. D of P. What does the auditor do, really and truly. We'll check this. Then we'll use the murder routine if all other points are verified." The auditor is crammed. The pc has a D of P Interview and three points arise. 1. Auditor's TR 2 is out, 2. Cleaning Cleans and getting into protest, and 3. Pc now ready for deeper running. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 14.5.72 -- D of P Interview done. The loose grip was spotted in the TA checklist. I used the footplates because 0.8 div difference at the time and pc happier with them. If D of P's opinion is correct my TR 2 has been short. So I'll pick it up, and be careful with the metering and TRs, and cans. I have gotten off all the overts I know of off on this and other pcs. They include rough TRs and mis-metering. I believe we can get him moving along alright. Suggest: 0. 2wc to F/N. 1. L&N Who or what would masturbate? Item O/W. If no blow L&N What intention would (_______) have. R3R (per LRH C/S 13.5.72). LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. I'm truly pleased. There's real hope for a top level auditor in you if you take it this well and handle. Do a smooth job now." The auditor does the C/S to a good result. At Examiner the pc says, "It feels great. It feels damn great." (The item O/Wed was "me".) AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 15.5.72 -- Yahoo! Got'em! Change of characteristic -- spoke to the Examiner. Real Bk Through for me -- audited like a well-oiled River! Should have taped it. 0. 2wc to F/N. 1. 2wc "What do you really want handled?" 2. L&N Triple and R3R Triple on reading areas. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 16.5.72 -- "Well hurrah! Very well done. The next C/S though to this is different. 225 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. L&N What is the Intention of me? BD F/N Item. 3. R3R on Item Triple. This is to follow through the H Standard using actually a XII RD and adapting it to Exp Dn." The next session the pc comes in with the TA at 3.1. The auditor two-way comms the pc to an F/N. Then when the above L&N is checked the TA flies to 4.6 and there it sticks even though the auditor tried to talk it down again. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S -- Hit the ditch. Not cans alone this time as I have checked those very carefully. Also he BDs to F/N at Exams on the same sized cans. I am missing something on him which he has suppressed. A list of areas from this session producing TA is attached. D/N and R/S on "me" and on "despatch". I took care to see he knew I had gotten what he said, several times. He knew I had gotten what he said. TA BDed on "someone could take money from bookstore" and started climbing when I asked him if he had. Said he never thought of doing it and he hadn't. Whatever it wasn't it was something I did, as the TA was actually high at 4.9 even when checking can grip. The fact that he BDs and F/Ns at Examiner means to me that he is W/Hing or protesting something from me but not at Examiner. It could still be TR 2. Something must be sitting there unacked. 1. D of P "In your last session what did the auditor do?" 2. D of P "In your last session were you protesting anything? Was anything unacknowledged?" 3. "Is there anything you haven't told?" (note read). Check cans first. LRH COMMENTS AND C/S 17.5.72 -- "This is what C/Ses are for. Since your new skill acquired in Cramming you have not run a C/S 53. Also you challenged him with your 2wc Q. It isn't a 2wc Q. What have you been up to is an invalidative auditing Q. How have you been or some social Q is 2wc to F/N. You are acting suspiciously. He feels it. He of course has overts all over the track. You are restimming them by being suspicious. You are not running O/W but appear to be trying to, so processes are mixing. You should be running standard Dn on him. Session probably started on an F/N (cold can). You gave it no time to warm. 1. C/S Series 53RC. 2. Handle. 3. Continue Sanderson RD. 226 And don't act like a detective! An auditor is a detective only when doing O/W on a pc that won't give." The auditor assesses the C/S 53RC and handles "don't like it". On the next assessment Int reads and so an Int Corr List is assessed. This does not read but the pc is very happy. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Do what Ron says! Pc ext, VVVGIs. The Int Corr List was clean but the area was what was hanging it up. He's had an "Int RD" in 1970 reported as "shallow didn't bite" by auditor. 0. 2wc "How do you feel about going into things?" to F/N. 1. If all ok, L&N "Intention of 'me'." 2. R3R Triple Item. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done!" The auditor does the C/S. The L&N item is "to be at cause" and this is R3R Tripled. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Doing fine. L&N went great -- hot item. The R3R is rough and very shallow and he tends to go into long situational descriptions on Step 7. Really needs a Dn C/S 1 on the R3R steps with demos. 0. R-Factor "We're going to go over the steps of R3R." 1. Go over each step of R3R with "apples" having the pc do demos of the chain and what happens. 2. Dummy run R3R with apples. 2a. Rud if no F/N. 3. 2wc "What do you really want handled on your case?" (Clear words backwards and "serious question" R-Factor.) 4. L&N Triple Intention + R3R. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 21.5.72 -- "Well done by Exams. This Dianetic R3R is too rough. 1-9 A-B look strange. The C/S is invalidative of this pc and it still shows to the pc. Long long yak is out TR 2 and defensive. 1. L1C In your auditing with me has there been. 2. Havingness. Then another auditor as I am tired of writing repair Pgms on this pc." The next day the pc reports to the MO sick. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- BER and sick 48 hrs after L&N and R3R session. (L1C C/S 21.5.72 not done.) 227 1. L4B. 2. If not all handled L-3ExDn. 3. LRH C/S 21.5.72. (L1C + Hav.) I am very willing to correct this myself. In view of your note on C/S of 21.5 is this OK? LRH COMMENT -- "OK." The auditor takes the pc in and does the C/S fully to a good result. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Pc doing fine now. Says illness came from stops on his bookstore purchasing lines. Also had a big win on a recall going back to age 1 1/2 or 2 and a glimpse of a past life. 1. To another auditor. 2. Complete Sanderson RD. 2wc "What do you really want handled?" Triple L&N (each R3Red Triple). 3. Repeat 2 and 3. LRH COMMENT 23.5.72 -- LRH crosses out step 1 of the C/S. "Very well done. Same auditor. Get this pc to a product!" The Sanderson RD is continued successfully for two sessions until pc feels nothing more to handle. The auditor at this point writes up the program. EXP DN PGM BY DN SPEC 25.5.72 -- Now doing well. Has had Sanderson RD. Happy with progress. "0. 3 May PL." Added by LRH 29.5.72. 1. "Destructive thing" RD -- LRH Pgm of 9.5.72. 2. PTS Rundown + Interview. (Include SP Items found 22.4.72.) 3. OCA and program. He is not sick. Body in good shape when not being damaged by accident. He should be phased over to Grade Chart for 0-III to be tripled up and IV Triple to be run. The pc hurt his foot so the auditor spent 2 sessions running the accident out. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Came out ok. R3R Slow. "None on F-2." I need to be smoother and faster with this guy so he feels more certain. Ruds came up between flows -- he had forged himself an OK to go ashore for dinner tonight. Very motivatorish about it all. 1. Fly each rud. 2. 2wc "Is there anything you want handled that we've missed?" 3. If so L&N Intention and R3R Triple. 228 4. If no wants handled "What destructive thing might you do?" to BD F/N. 5. L&N "Intention behind that?" 6. R3R Triple. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 29.5.72 -- "Too long in auditing. Out-Ethics on the case won't let it run. 1. 3 May 72 PL. 2. L&N Lists (Steps 3, 4). If Why finding been done on him before do it like C/S Series 78. When this is done he can go on. He's just about to get taken off auditing lines so is Out-Ethics. Should have been a Product way back. Then your C/S the next day." The 3 May PL was eventually done to a good result, but then the pc was sent to serve in an area of the world that to date has not got Exp Dianetics. The Case as such remains incomplete. A second OCA was never -- done prior to leaving so there is no record of the change that was brought about by the auditing as outlined in this BTB. TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 33. TOTAL NO. OF HRS IN THE CHAIR: 63 hrs 23 mins. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED [This BTB is revised by BTB 13 March 1975R, Revised 30 April 1975, TRs Training Breakthrough, which says, "Assessments are done to impinge and get a meter to read. The Auditor barks the last word and the last syllable so it does impinge. You don't go -------\, -------\. Go _______/, _______/. You don't drop your voice or downcurve your voice tone at the end of the line as that will cost you reads. You punch the last syllable to make it read, and TO the pc. This is different from a lilt which is a _______/." This BTB was approved by L. Ron Hubbard.] 229  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=30/10/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 18 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE L  Type = 11 iDate=30/10/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN Remimeo 30 OCTOBER 1972 Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors Issued 28 March 1974 CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 30 OCTOBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 18 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE L [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES -- Pc Va. Chronic sickie -- chronic skin trouble -- constantly in Ethics trouble. 0.5 on Chart of Human Evaluation -- thereabouts. OCA is in the white on both left and the right. He's had quickie W/C M1 and a quickie Drug Rundown. Not nearly enough Dianetics. Has an almost continual Low TA. EXPANDED DIANETIC PROGRAM BY DN SPEC 2.4.72 -- 1. Hi-Lo to F/Ning list. (LRH added "Cleared".) 2. Complete Primary Rundown. (a) W/C M1 -- Word Clear W/C M1 C/S 1 and WCCL first. (b) Continue with steps 3 and 4 of Primary Rundown -- complete Rundown. 3. Complete C/S 1. 4. W/C each word in R3R commands and each word in the L-3B. 5. Triple Assess: Post, action, missions, Ethics, Comm Evs, Conditions, Study, doctors, medication, sickness, 2-D. Run the attitudes and emotions R3R Triple -- cont to F/Ning list. 6. Assess C1 VIII list (auditors, auditing, etc) adding Solo and Clearing. Assess attitudes and emotions on best reading item, list and do R3R Triple to F/Ning list. 7. Do a new W/F. (a) Take all emotional stresses, losses and deaths R3R Triple Narrative. (b) If attitudes to illness and treatment reading -- run R3R Triple. 230 8. Clear and assess (in turn) LX3, LX2, LX1 and handle R3R Triple. 9. New OCA and reprogram accordingly. The pc is under Comm Ev and so it is some time before he is sessionable. AUDITOR'S C/S 18.5.72 -- Should be out of Ethics tomorrow. Time to start. 1. Clear all words on Hi-Lo. 2. Hi-Lo to F/N list. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 18.5.72 -- "There's an out of seq in the Pgm. The Prim RD and WC1 are out of seq here. He won't get them done and he hasn't started. This is a very bad OCA and a bad (low) TA. C/S 53RC is better now than Hi-Lo. 1. Clear all wds on Hi-Lo. 2. Hi-Lo to F/N list. 3. Hav. 4. Clear C/S 53RC. 5. C/S 53RC to F/N list. 6. Hav." LRH PROGRAM 18.5.72 -- "Bad OCA. Low TA. Blames seniors. Lots Hav and Tch Assist. 1. Hi-Lo to F/N list. 2. C/S 53RC to F/N list. 3. Clear WCCL and handle to F/N. (3a. 3 May 72 PL added by auditor 21.5.72 okayed by LRH.) 4. Complete C/S 1. Include every wd in R3R. 5. Draw Flows Quadruple. | ^ F1 <--- F2 ---> F3 | F3 | (2 directions v | of Other others) 6. Draw bank and Clear. 7. Assess PT Env List (see 2 Apr Pgm). 8. Class VIII List (see 2 Apr). 9. Clear all words Sanderson RD. Incl 'Handled'. 10. Sanderson RD. (Crossed out by LRH.) *11. PTS Int. *12. PTS RD. *13. D of P disconnect. *14. Can't Hav RD. *FOOTNOTE: Correct order per HCOB 17 Apr 72, C/S Series 76, "C/Sing a PTS Rundown" is: 1. PTS Int 3. PTS RD 2. Disconnect 4. Can't Have RD 231 15. Metalosis. 16. OCA and Interview." PROGRAM BEGUN 19.5.72 -- Auditor spends the session clearing the words on the Hi-Lo, ending off with Havingness. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 19.5.72 -- Went well. Apparently previous auditors had him wipe hands a Jot, as at first he'd do so about every 5 minutes. Then he relaxed and quit. TA went low but no real problem. 1. Hi-Lo to F/N list. 2a. Hav. 2. Clear C/S 53RC. 3. C/S 53RC to F/N list. 4. Hav. 5. Clear WCCL. 6. WCCL to F/N. 7. Hav. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Auditors whose TRs are out substitute a towel. (Joke)" The Hi-Lo and C/S 53RC are completed in the next three sessions. The 3 May PL, C/S 1 and clearing steps of the Pgm are done. The next session the C/S 6 list was clean so auditor goes onto Sanderson RD. The TA flies up and the auditor handles somehow to F/N, using C/S 53RC and WCCL. Also pc tired so 2wc'ed "Failed Purpose". LRH COMMENT AND C/S 30.5.72 -- "Well done on sess. Admin ghastly. Sending you to Cramming to get Admin straight as I can't really C/S it as don't have data from W/Sheets. 1. Clean up the rest of C/S 53RC. Get F/Ning list. 2. Finish WCCL Clearing. 3. Hav." The auditor does the C/S 53RC to a good win for pc. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 30.5.72 -- Yesterday's session I 2wc'ed "Failed Purpose". It should be L&Ned. He may have already given it. There is a lot of stuff there. Sorry about last session went over last part again. 232 1. C/S 53RC F/N list. 2. Ind pc will L&N for Failed Purpose. Be alert he may have already given it. 3. L&N Int connected to it. R3R Triple. 4. Check "loneliness on post" for read and interest. (See this session W/S pg 4.) R3R Triple. 5. Get EAIs on "last (leader) removed yesterday" (pg 31, 29 May W/S). R3R Triple. 6. Get EAIs on "want it running now it hasn't been" (pg 27). R3R Triple. 7. "We need a leader" (pg 30) handle as in 5 and 6. 8. "Moving people all got changed except me" (pg 26). Handle as above. 9. "still have to repeat process" (pg 29). R3R Triple on EAIs. 10. "Wanted to go back to Ops" (pg 25) handle same. 11. "I just want it going" (pg 29) handle same. 12. "No leader, no team at all" (pg 29) handle same. 13. Check "so lonely" for read and int. R3R Triple. 14. Check "was sad" for read and int R3R Triple. 15. Hav. I did not do 2 of your C/S as I've cleared WCCL. I'm not sure what I did in admin that showed that. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 31.5.72 -- "Well done. You finished the temporary repair caused by an area upset. You're cleaning cleans with this C/S. The situation ended with restoring (_______ old boss) to Post. This wd be a Q&A C/S. DON'T VEER OFF PGMS. PGMS MEAN SOMETHING. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Class VIII List RD. 3. Hav. To D of P for PTS Int." AUDITOR'S NOTE TO COMMODORE 1.6.72 -- Pc unsessionable 2 days, due to missions. He has been good abt informing Tech Services. I don't think he is trying to get out of session. I thought you should know this. He'll get session tomorrow. LRH COMMENT -- "OK. Maybe he hit an EP. He's doing great or was when I last had contact." The auditor continues with the Pgm. On step 10, PTS Interview, done by the auditor in session, no PTS person is found. The auditor goes on to the PTS RD, does 2 S&Ds and runs the items Triple R3R, Ruds and overts. However pc goes to the Examiner and his TA had dropped to 1.6. 233 AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 2.6.72 -- Red Tab. I don't see a session error it went great. 1. 2wc "Is there anything in your last session you did not feel right about". Handle as needed. 2. Cont PTS RD. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 3.6.72 -- "Both items are inflow. Could be on same list. You had it 1st Item on list. Usually the case. There may be a listing error. You should have grabbed pc at Examiner. He's on a hot spot on post. 1. R-Factor: We have to correct the last session. Assess: Out Ruds _______ Wrong List _______ Session Error _______ Post Upset _______ Wrong Item _______ An overt to put it on list _______ Auditor overwhelmed you _______ Item was missed _______ Another Item has yet to be found _______ +Did both these Items belong on same list _______ (It is 3 S&Ds not 2.) +Probably it's the last one 2. Handle the above, L1C if auditor, L-4B if list. 3. C/S 53RC -- Handle. 4. Hav." The auditor does the C/S. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 4.6.72 -- Nothing was wrong. Maybe Examiner. He's doing great! PTS RD DONE. 1. D of P Disconnect. 2. Can't Hav RD. 3. Hav. LRH PROGRAM 4.6.72 -- "All right. We have him where he lives. He has mainly Org terminals as his SPs. So by flow study that makes him what? Accounts for earlier Aide failures. 1. Auditor's C/S 4 June 72 complete Can't Have RD. 234 2. 3 May 72 PL. Preface in the last couple of years. 3. Find all Ev Purps ever run or found even if D/Led (L-10 L-10M W/Sheets etc). Note 2 Apr Pgm. Look at W/Sheets to see if any gotten off. 4. R3R Triple on those that read. 5. L&N Triple for Ev Purps per L-10 list actions 'Multiple Flow' if not done. 5a. Pc not had it so do L-10 Multiple (added after the next session). 6. R3R Triple on 5a. (We MUST get this guy straight. Could cost us a million if we flub it as he is handling Orgs!) 7. PTS Corr List. Any additional terms + Can't Have. 8. Metalosis. 9. OCA & Int." The auditor does the C/S and the 2 L&N lists of 3 May PL. The pc is F/N at the end of session but TA 1.5 at Examiner. Auditor has re-exam with different Examiner and pc says, "The session was fantastic and thought it was great. Handled s'thing that's been bugging me for years." TA 2.3 Wide F/N. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 4.6.72 -- He loved the C/S, 3 May PL especially. I don't know what the scene is with ( Examiner). Every time pc has been red-tab () was Examiner. I checked, nothing wrong, sent him for new exam with different Examiner. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. Continue with LRH Pgm 4 June 72. 3. Hav. Note: He's never had L-10 of any sort. I found Ev Purp on an Int Corr List. He is Va. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 5.6.72 -- "C/S not correct. Pc never had L-10 Multiple or Single. (LRH alters Pgm and adds step 5a to it.) Not well done because of admin. I can't read the W/Ses. The auditor does not put down what the pc was talking about. So I can't work it out to C/S it. I can't make this session out at all. Can't see what the pc was saying. Doesn't make any sense at all. Clarifying words is not the problem here. What incident did the pc run? What was it all about? That's what a C/S has to know. The pc cd be jumping chains, anything, as there's no data. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. R3R Trip on the PL 3 May 2 Items. 3. Do Multiple Flow Evil Purposes from L-10 Sheet. 4. R3R each. 5. Hav." The C/S was done and the Pgm continued over many sessions. At the end of the Metalosis RD the pc attests and is sent for a new OCA. 235 PC'S SUCCESS STORY -- For about the past 6-8 months I've had one kind of pain or another in my guts -- something so bad I couldn't sit still for more than a few minutes. But now after the RD it's gone -- completely! like magic. It's a big difference not to be in pain and this is a real win. OCA GRAPH -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] The graph is much improved but still down on the right. The pc is currently having more Exp Dn to handle this. TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 24/ TOTAL NO. OF HOURS IN THE CHAIR: 39 hrs 43 mins. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the a CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 236  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=1/11/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 19 EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE M  Type = 11 iDate=1/11/72 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1 NOVEMBER 1972 Issued 28 March 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors CANCELS HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1972 Expanded Dianetics Series 19 (Series Number Amended) EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE M [GRAPHICS INSERTED] CASE NOTES This case OT VII, L-9S, L-10M, is recalled to Flag for auditing. LRH TIP 3 APR 72 (TECHNICAL INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM) -- "Assignment: On bd for rapid briefing actions and to return as C/O (_______). Study: Primary RD. *The Product Pgm and C/S in ( other pc's) folder which I will C/S. Promotion Clearing (org is engaged in expensive lists and promo very poor for cost). Auditing: As above." PROGRAM BY CL XII C/S 4.4.72 -- Primary RD. 1. False TA List. C/S 53. WCCL. 2. Method One, Verify/Complete. 3. Product Pgm C/Sed by LRH per TIP. *FOOTNOTE: This Product Pgm is an Experimental Pgm which in fact never was run on this pc. It remains experimental and has not been released. 237 The above program is done as far as completing Method One which the pc attests. Later LRH sends a note to the Tech Sec. LRH NOTE 22.4.72 -- "Pc is to be run on Exp Dn after Study RD. (Also R3R on goals, etc from L-10 will make him sane.)" EVAL BY EXP DN AUDITOR 23.4.72 -- SITUATION 1. Has just had M1 verified + C/S 53RRR and handled. 2. He is programmed for Exp Dn after Product RD Exp. 3. There is an outstanding order from you that he do Exp Dn after Study RD. DATA Not audited since 13.4.72 (10 days). Audited without FES. Now lined up and waiting for Expertmental Product RD (postulate level processing) which should be handled after Exp Dn per Tape Exp Dn 1. HANDLING 1. That his program be revised to the two programs I have written for the case. 2. That I do the Study RD assess and handle (any L&N would be done by Exp Dn Team Lead Auditor) and the remaining program steps. 3. That steps 1 and 2 of the set-up be done while FES is being drawn up to prevent delay as they are both necessary and as C/S 53RRR has just been handled. EXP DN SET-UP PGM BY EXP DN SPEC 23.4.72 -- Has had M1 verified and C/S 53RRR recently handled. To prepare for Exp Dn: 1. Study Corr List assess and handle. 2. Clear all words L-3ExDn and R3R. 3. To Exp Dn. EXP DN PGM BY DN SPEC 23.4.72 -- 0. Find Hav -- run before and after each session. 1. 2wc your PT Environment. Note all BD and F/N items. Get attitudes, emotions R3R Triple. 2. Assess auditing buttons (VIII list C/S 6) attitudes, emotions R3R Triple. 3. LX3, 2, 1 + R3R Triple. 4. Items from L-10 R3R Triple. 5. OCA. LRH COMMENT -- "OK." The auditor assesses the Study Corr List and on the question 1Q. "Have you ever cheated on an exam?" the question gets an LF and on the assessment from that point 238 the TA rises to 4.4. The auditor checked O/R and got a response so rehabbed an earlier study release. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Cleared Study Corr List and handled ARC Bk. Ran into soaring TA on assessment, small reads. Rehabbed the O/R and did Hav to F/N. Now needs to have the Study Corr List assessed over in-ruds. 1. All ruds to F/N. 2. R-Factor on reassessing Study Corr List -- reassess and handle. 3. Clear any words on R3R + L-3ExDn. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 26.4.72 -- "Well done. He hit a w/h and it made the TA soar (by list study)." (LRH writes on the List against question 1Q "Overt withhold caused TA to Soar.,,) "DON'T BEGIN A MAJOR ACTION WITHOUT GETTING FIRST AN F/N. 1. 2wc to F/N. 2. R-Factor on question 1Q, there was a question 'Have you ever cheated on an exam?' (Watch for read.) 2wc to F/N. 3. Fly all ruds. But if no F/N on 2 above assess a C/S 53RRR, and return to me. 4. R-Factor: We have to get an F/Ning List on study. Reassess whole list. 5. Handle." The next two sessions the auditor handles the Study Corr List. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 27.4.72 -- Finished all handling of Study Corr List except 2 L&Ns (to be done by Lead Auditor) and 2 hours TR 0 on "Gothic Books". (11B "Can't you confront books or printed pages?" What, TR 0 on it for 2 hours.) Went fine. 1. Rud if no F/N. 2. Handle 8-J and 8-E (two L&Ns). 3. 2 hours TR 0 on "Gothic Books". 4. Attest Study Corr List complete. 5. Clear all L-3ExDn words. 6. Exp Dn Pgm. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done." LRH had crossed out 4 above and written: "Reassess SCL to F/Ning List. Attest only if it F/Ns. If any reads, handle and reassess." 239 The SCL is handled to F/N list and the pc attests. The words are cleared on R3R and the L-3ExDn and the Exp Dn Pgm is started. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 2.5.72 -- Doing well. Two points: 1. Possible error was I did "Emotions" connected to one area, R3R to F/N list, then took up next area to F/N list on Emotions without checking for any remaining attitudes in first area. 2. He is somewhat out of session but is very willing to "supply" VGIs -- They're there but feels like he is thinking about what to say to please auditor. Very co-operative. It's an unchanging characteristic. Probably just needs good continued auditing where he is at. Example is when listing emotions connected to ( wife's name) he had to work on it. So it will come out in the wash as long as we keep getting him where he lives. 0. Fly each rud. 1. Check Hav for effect with can squeeze. Change if necessary. 2. Check for attitudes on first two areas handled ("People who don't produce" and "" wife's name). List and take to F/N list. 3. Handle all remaining PT Environment buttons -- list + R3R to F/N list. 4. Assess C/S 6, attitudes, emotions R3R Triple. 5. Continue program. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 3.5.72 -- "D of P Int. What did Auditor do. How do you feel about your case. To make up for your 'no okay to L&N' you are avoiding standard Exp Dn. This guy has INTENTIONS. He also has OUT RUDS. He also isn't in session. So you'll just have to match up to the pc's needs and handle. It isn't attitudes you want. It's intentions." D OF P INTERVIEW -- (Not done on meter.) 1. What did the auditor do? (Hesitation) Auditor audited me on R3R. I didn't know anything was out on R3R. (Hesitation.) I think if anything, perhaps the question in regard to environment maybe my attention wasn't directed to the right place. Thought it was a good session. (Pc "ahs" and "you knows" a lot.) Q on PT Environment I believe I gave what was wanted. That's the only point, the original question. (Hesitation) I don't know if that's where the area of charge is. Dianetic auditing real good. Pictures erasing. It's cool. (Pc goes thro a lot of mannerisms, hands across face, arm over head, looking around, tapping leg, fingering things.) ANYTHING ELSE? (Hesitation) Only point (comm lag) I think of. I just don't know if that's where the charge is. Don't believe that's where the charge is. (Referring to session.) Charge started earlier than Thursday. He had TRs in. Ran me. Made sure I erased it. 240 (Hesitation) Maybe the question should have been checked. He probably did. I don't recall. He audited me very well. The only thing it could be is the question. 2. How do you feel about your case? Want to get more into it. (Hesitation) And handle whatever needs handling and do whatever I'm supposed to do. That's how I feel about my case. And oh! I feel I have to take more responsibility and get more charge off my case that's all. I feel that the actions that I have are very thoroughly in, couldn't be shifted by a crane, (laugh) you know, like, I feel a tank couldn't take me off my purpose. Feel I can get from A to B. Want to get more straight to help Scientology. No big thing. Pc also mentioned before leaving he needed lots of rest for long sessions. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 4.5.72 -- "Lousiest and almost the least informative D of P Interview seen for some time. Leaves a C/S digging his wits for data. But apparently pc has something to handle. Also he was run on an unreading question. Also he is in an ARC Bk (sounds sad) or a failed purpose (tired). (Needs lots of sleep to be audited.) You can't audit over a possible ARC Br and a failed purpose is heavy on the case. This person is also Out-Ethics. 0. R-Factor -- you were run on an unreading item. 00. C/S 53RRR handle. 1. Triple Ruds + Overts LD. 2. L&N, check for read. What purpose has failed? to BD F/N item. R3R Triple. 3. 2wc What do you want handled? Mark all BDs and F/Ns." LRH PROGRAM 4.5.72 -- "Not in session PR GIs ARC Brk LD? Failed Purpose. Hidden Standard. Run on unreading Item. 1. C/S 53RRR handle. 2. Triple Ruds LD + Overts. 3. L&N What purpose has failed. BD F/N. R3R Triple. 4. L&N What do you want handled. 5. R3R on BD Item. 6. 2wc What do you want handled. 7. R3R on BD F/N Items. 8. All Ev Purps found on case. R3R Triple. *9. Env Prepcheck from list of 2.5.72 reassessed. 10. HCO PL 3 May 72. *FOOTNOTE: List of 2.5.72 is list of BD Items from 2wc on PT Environment. 241 (He has Out-Ethics.) (Has to be gotten uptone to see them.)" The next session the auditor alters the C/S, and runs the Triple Ruds first and without any Overts. He then does the C/S 53RRR and gets into list correction. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 5.5.72 -- Corny auditor errors. Did Triple Ruds before C/S 53 -- out of sequence. Omitted "Overt" after LD Ruds. Altered C/S = Out Tech. Did Triple Ruds out of sequence (F-1 ARC Bk, F-1 PTP, then 2 & 3 ARC Bk, 2 & 3 PTP, then W/H Triple.) Proposed cramming attached. "0. Touch Assist to F/N VGIs (strained a muscle yesterday)" added by LRH. 1. Get correct item on the list of 28.4.72. (SCL 8E. What mystery are you trying to solve?) 2. L4B to F/Ning list. 3. C/S 53 to F/Ning list. 4. L&N "What purpose has failed" (LRH C/S 4 May 72.) 5. R3R Triple. 6. 2wc "What do you want handled?" Mark all BDs and F/Ns. *7. L&N: "What intentions are connected with _______ (BD F/N item)". 8. R3R Triple. LRH COMMENT -- "Seen." LRH adds Touch Assist to C/S. "Pulled muscle yesterday and went to MO, this evening, for T. Assist. MO report attached." MO REPORT -- Routed onto MO lines for a leg pain from pulled muscle -- from football on the dock. The complete C/S was done the next session and the pc says at Exams, "Breathless -- Fantastic session." LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. Surprisingly good result." The LRH program is continued and completed with a big win and cog. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 7.5.72 -- 3 sessions, completed program. He had a big win and cog, "I'm not motivator hungry any more." EP Exp Dn? *FOOTNOTE: Correct listing question is "What intention is connected to (BD F/N item)". Asking for plural Intentions is an invalid listing question because it asks for more than one item. 242 Also V. mollified but VGI on the L&N 3 May PL. 1. OCA and program. (Tried to get him to do OCA tonight but he was busy writing up 1st Dyn Danger Formula. I'm not sure what he needs next but will see from OCA. He could go to Experimental Product RD.) OCA GRAPH 8.5.72 -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND NEW PROGRAM 8.5.72 -- Still low column G - new low, probably more honest than previously. But maybe ARC Bk. Exp Dn Pgm. "O. Hav all sessions" added by LRH. 1. Triple Ruds "on Flag". 2. Assess: (_______ pc's Org), Los Angeles, USLO, Flag, New York, (_______ co-Executive), Command team, LRH, The Commodore, Postulate checks, crush sell, Ethics, Tech, Policy, Off Policy, Admin, Establishment, Products, VFPs, Dissemination, The Public, The people, Scientology, Clearing, the planet. L&N Intention connected with reading areas and R3R Triple. 3. After each L&N + R3R, L&N F-2 Intention -- "What intention does another have towards you connected with (_______ item)". Then F-3 "What intention do others have towards others connected with (_______ item)". These all done should care for Dynamic 3. 4. Repeat action on: You as a thetan, your mind, your body, your name, your rank, your case, eating, your life, your language, your communications, your thoughts, your possessions, your situation. 5. Do the same for: ( wife's name), your marriage, your wife, married women, single women, sex, celibacy, balling, children, offspring, your family, your mother, your father, your brother, your ancestors, genitals, masturbation, fornication, future generations, your generation. That should handle a lot. 6. Then: The Race, The Planet, Mankind, Human beings, humanoids, fellows, beings, Russians, Americans, Earthmen, aliens, space-men, other Races. Handle as in 2 and 3. 7. 2wc How do you feel about your case? 8. Program as indicated. 243 AUDITOR'S C/S 5.5.72 -- OCA still sags on right -- probably more honest. But intentions all across the board should be looked at. "1. Check Flag for read" added by LRH. Triple Ruds on "Flag". 2. Assess list from Pgm and handle. 3. Continue Pgm. LRH COMMENT -- "OK as noted." The auditor does the C/S and Pgm down to step 4 Of Pgm and pc has huge win and so the auditor ends off. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 9.5.72 -- Wow, wow. Never seen him like this, so excited. L&N Triple Intentions on "The Command Team" + R3R and then on "your mind" tore the case wide open. Some sort of OT valence shift page 45 and 46. RESPONSIBILITY cogs left and right. ("My responsibility is back.") He just shifted beingness in a big way. Looks like we cracked him but good. I don't think his OCA would sag anymore. 0. 2wc to F/N "Tell me about your wins." 1. 2wc "Is there anything you feel you want handled?" to F/N. 2. If all well, OCA and:. 3. Experimental Product RD. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done. May be unnecessary to go on. This C/S is okay. That may be it. C/S ok." In the next session the pc gives some items he wants handled. At the end the pc says, "To be able to control, control towards survival and optimum conditions." (F/N VGIs.) "That is really where my head is at, proper control." (F/N VGIs IND.) AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S -- Not complete, I guess. He has several areas he wants handled. I. The body: heat, reaction to hot temperatures, nervous for no reason, lower back muscles, lower part of body, pains in body. II. Rollercoasters, losing attention units, resurgence of being -- loss afterwards, diminished life force. III. Pictures not under control, automatic pictures. IV. Failed control is the item that F/Ned. He is noted in the Case Progress sheet as having had the PTS RD in 71, but I see no record of the session. He has not had it, I am sure. Can be checked with the pc. The first thing to handle would be the PTS RD. Pre-Flag folders and LA folders not here. 244 0. Check if he has had it. 1. Get him to tell you any past S&D items, if any. 2. If none do 3 S&Ds. 3. R3R Triple, Triple Ruds and overts. 4. 2wc "Who he has known this life who has worried or troubled him". Check for known before this lifetime. R3R Triple Ruds + overts. 5. 2wc "Been after this LT" if known before, R3R Triple + Ruds + overts. 6. Places and planets known before this LT. Handle as above. 7. Assess PTS Correction List and handle to F/N list. LRH COMMENT 11 May 72 -- "I won't give you any grade for this session as it's a goof in Admin, C/Sing and Pgming. You must stay on Pgms and complete RDs. (You have decided now to go into another RD leaving Sanderson RD incomplete.) You ONLY run items in pc's wording. Do not change wording. (You changed his wording to 'Failed Control' which he did NOT say.) You must mark BDs plainly when doing one of these 2wcs for things to handle. Not all TA actions are marked so one is not sure what read. I am sure the needle was active. Yet is not noted. Having found where his attn is fixated you must now follow through. But he did not answer the auditing question. He didn't tell you what he wanted handled. He told you what he wanted to achieve. And you can't run that! It would be trying to as-is ambition, which wouldn't erase and would down curve him and wreck him. When you start an RD you finish it. Now I'm dead ended as a C/S. I have no real reads marked. The pc didn't really tell you. So I can't say what to R3R. It is NOT 'failed control'. The pc never said a word about it! You put an item of your own on the pc AND THAT IS A LISTING CRIME. Also what's this 'E/S' doing on pg 5 mixed into 2wc for things to handle. You must not mix up actions. The report sheet is a false report. And a less experienced C/S would have been thrown by it. The part of this which I have been alerted by, in this, and other sessions, is a lack of program command. This IS a Rundown you are doing. It does have steps. You do do them in sequence. One must NOT start one thing, break off and start another. All these are very basic auditing flaws. Reviewing this it appears we did not end off on the Pgm underway but are 2 or 3 sessions deep on AN UNPROGRAMMED ACTION! In other words, we are running a case now without a program WHICH IS ILLEGAL AS HELL. Apparently things have been done not ticked off on the last 2 programs. This case isn't going A to B by a long way. Get checked out on this in cramming. 245 Pgm the case. Only you know what you've done here. Then I'll okay it. You have begun the Sanderson RD. Get checked out on it. Get it completed. Then a PTS Int and verification. Let's finish this case up!" RE-PROGRAM BY EXP DN SPEC 11.5.72 -- 1. Complete Sanderson RD. Handle all reading items from last 2wc. 2. If any further H. Std areas show up, to be handled first. 3. PTS Check + RD if indicated. 4. OCA + Program (if necessary). The auditor does a series of sessions and completes the Sanderson RD. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 12.5.72 -- Went great. No reading answers to 2wc, has at present time nothing he can think of he wants handled. He looks good too -- a lot younger. 1. Full D of P PTS Check. 2. If needed PTS RD. 3. OCA (if 2 not needed OCA directly). LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done." The PTS Interview is done and the PTS RD completed. LRH adds Metalosis RD and this is done to a good result. AUDITOR'S COMMENT AND C/S 19.5.72 -- Went fine on Metalosis RD with some great cogs. Realised after the session hadn't made sure there was nothing missed so took him in for another 2 minutes and asked him. He was very happy and calm. OCA: He has regained an honest, high G trait. I recommend he be OK'd to fire at this time. 1. Declare Metalosis RD. 2. Declare Exp Dn Complete. 3. OK to fire. LRH COMMENT -- "Very well done." The pc goes through the lines on his declare cycles successfully. The auditor however finds an action not done on the pc's TIP and rushes a query to LRH. AUDITOR'S QUERY 20.5.72 -- In error I overlooked that his original TIP called for the Experimental Product RD and I proposed OK to fire without this. LRH COMMENT AND C/S 20.5.72 -- "No. Abandon the TIP. His failure is that he fails to get Ethics in on others and fails to understand Exchange. 246 1. 2wc on how he's doing now. 2. L&N to BD F/N item (clear words) 'What would be the consequences of getting Ethics in on others?' 3. R3R Triple any item. 4. 2wc How do you feel about Ethics now? (If reservations, end off the session for a C/S.) *5. PL 4 Apr 72 pg 4 & 5 as marked. (a) Clear the Words PRODUCT, EXCHANGE, DYNAMIC, Dyn 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8. (Clear 1 as a spirit, body as 5.) (b) Have him draw a big chart of numbered dynamics in 2 columns vertical: 1 -----------> 1 Draw in arrows only 1 <----------- 1 as he does them. 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 (c) Go through the exchanges. What does he exchange with his own 1st (spirit). 1 -----------> 1 What does it exchange with him. 1 <---------- 1 (d) Keep this up to huge cog." The auditor does the C/S to a tremendous win. AUDITOR'S COMMENTS AND C/S 21.5.72 -- Now ready to fire for real. Valence shift, cogs on all Dynamics, responsibility level soaring, and I have never seen him so present. Now that he's here he can go. 0. Declare Exch by Dyn RD Completed. 1. OK to fire. LRH COMMENT 21.5.72 -- "Very well done. It might interest you to know that I brought him back from (_______) just to set him up to rem and run Exchange by Dyn -- step 2 of my last session C/S. Your C/S is correct." *FOOTNOTE: HCO PL 4 Apr 72, EstO Series 14, "Ethics". 247 AUDITOR NOTE 21.5.72 -- (_______ pc) has completed his auditing and his OCA is good. He looks very good also. Request ok for him to fire to (_______). LRH COMMENT 21.5.72 -- "OK. Wonderful job." PC'S SUCCESS STORY -- Expanded Dianetics. Well, what I did was expand immensely by doing Expanded Dianetics and erasing formidable chains which once shackled me to reactive -areas -- now totally blown. Especial acknowledgement to my auditor and to LRH who charted the newly discovered "Terra Incognita". OCA GRAPH 19.5.72 -- [GRAPHICS INSERTED] TOTAL NO. OF SESSIONS: 24. TOTAL HOURS IN THE CHAIR: 67 hrs 09 min. Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:WS:MM:ntm.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 248  Compiled by: Flag Dn Spec Team for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 11 iDate=15/2/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 20 SERVICE FACSIMILE THEORY AND EXPANDED DIANETICS   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1974 (Amended & Reissued 28 March 74 -- only change is Series No.) Remimeo Expanded Dianetics Series 20 SERVICE FACSIMILE THEORY AND EXPANDED DIANETICS As a re-study of Service Facsimiles the following theory is released as background. Note that this is background data for Class IV but is in actual practice used on Expanded Dianetics. This sheds some light on Evil Purposes. And a new approach comes to light for use in Expanded Dianetics. NONE OF THIS ALTERS CLASS IV and NONE OF IT CANCELS OR CHANGES CLASS IV OR EARLIER DATA. AN OUTLINED NEW XDN RD Service Facs By Dynamics and sections thereof. How to be right on the _______ Dynamic Triple. (The exact Question needs to be worked out for various pcs.) All L&N and therefore very dicey. The theory is that a thetan even when pressed or suppressed to the absolute limit of near extinction will still try, even when "cooperating", to some way be right. A thetan cannot die. His only out is to try to stop something as he himself cannot stop living. This gives rise to fixed ideas as he is trying to stop -- therefore the ideas hold in time and continue. His efforts to be right continue to stop him in a reverse flow. This is true because he is already at near total effect. He also becomes the effect of his own fixed idea efforts to handle. Just as a man being crushed by a house-size rock will still put his hands out to fend it off, so will a thetan continue to fend off his believed oppressions by stopping them. Insistence on rightness is a last refuge of beingness. Thus one gets some very aberrated ones. These he uses in situations where he thinks he might be found wrong. These are called "Service Facsimiles". "Service" because they "serve" him. "Facsimiles" because they are in mental image picture form. They explain his disabilities as well. 249 The facsimile part is actually a self-installed disability that "explains" how he is not responsible for not being able to cope. So he is not wrong for not coping. Part of the "package" is to be right by making wrong. The service facsimile is therefore a picture containing an explanation of self condition and also a fixed method of making others wrong. A real handling would have to include: A. What disability he uses to explain how he is not responsible for not fully coping with life or given situations. B. A fixed postulate he uses to further assert that in actual fact he is still right. C. The computation as contained in B to make others wrong so as to be right. Handling therefore would include: a. The disability R3R Triple. b. L&N for a fixed postulate on each dynamic he uses to be right. c. A realization he is using this to make others wrong so he can be right. All these conditions would have to be handled to fully handle a Service Fac to full EP. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.ntm.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 250  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=28/3/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 21 EXPANDED DIANETICS DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE ORIGINAL LECTURES   Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 28 MARCH 1974 Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses Ex Dn Auditors Expanded Dianetics Series 21 Ref: Ex Dn Tape Lectures and Case Histories. EXPANDED DIANETICS DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE ORIGINAL LECTURES Since the original lectures on Expanded Dianetics and Case Histories were released several HCO Bs were issued under my name which I did not authorize. These have been cancelled. . I thought I'd better cover the developments since the original materials and clear up any questions or conflicts that may have arisen over the unauthorized HCO Bs. EXPANDED DIANETICS PROGRAMMING Expanded Dianetics programming is not rote but each programme is laid out for that individual pc taking him from his current state to a shiny product. The programme is worked out from data gotten by FES, OCA, Chart of Human Evaluation and D of P Interviews. The product of an Ex Dn complete pc is visible by OCA, Chart of Human Evaluation, and pc satisfaction in having handled what he wanted handled. Endless Ex Dn to no product occurs only when the C/S violates the basics of Ex Dn programming as covered in my tape lectures and the Case Histories, when the pc is run on actions that he doesn't need and aren't reading or when the pc was not set up for Ex Dn in the first place. EXPANDED DIANETICS SET-UPS Usually a C/S Series 53RF and a list correction are needed set-up actions if they haven't been done. A thorough C/S-1 and full word clearing are vital. A Drug RD must be done or completed before Ex Dn is done or it will fail. This includes Objectives. You can't do Ex Dn until Drugs are all handled. TROUBLE ON ENGRAMS The pc who cannot run engrams has misunderstoods on the commands and terms of R3R and Dianetics, or it's drugs. The pc will be able to run drugs because that's what he's stuck in. He'll run those automatically as long as you've done the necessary Word Clearing. Pcs who won't go backtrack are druggies or in recent shock of having died. This is handled by a thorough Drug RD and if necessary the usual Dianetic backtrack remedies As and Es double-assessed. Ss and Ps could be checked as well. LATER EX DN RUNDOWNS Class VIH C/S-6 list is useful in running out past bad auditing. It is fully covered on Tape 1. Other Class VIII lists are not used as you won't get anywhere running AEIs from a significance. 251 Intentions in AEI Treble Assessments are run in order of read. Interest is not checked. As intentions exist on all 3 flows you could list for the intentions on the other 2 flows after you have listed the intentions connected with _______ and run them R3R Triple. You can only list and run intentions connected with a terminal or mass or somatic never a significance. The R3R commands are: F-1 "Locate an incident of another causing you to have the intention _______." F-2 "Locate an incident of you causing another to have the intention _______." F-3 "Locate an incident of others causing others to have the intention _______." Good Intentions are never run. Never. The cure for a pc who is run on a good intention is a C/S Series 53RF. The cure for the auditor is to fully define the words: good, worthy, positive, pro-survival, evil, bad, unworthy, negative and contra-survival. Then have him re-study the related materials. If it recurs, get him audited on a 3 May PL and Ex Dn. R3R all E. Purps culled from the folder is done as a first action in Ex Dn. Subsequent E. Purps brought up in sessions are noted and R3R'd later on in the programme before any PTS RD is done. These E. Purps have to be verified as to wording and checked for read before running, but not interest. Considerable charge can be bypassed if E. Purps are missed so this action is thoroughly done. R/S Handling, also called the Responsibility RD, is done as OCA right- hand side handling. A list of all R/Sing statements is made then each taken up. The idea is an R/S will occur in connection with a terminal which will read when checked, and that's what you want to run. The R/Sing statement itself will often mention a terminal. If not the auditor can do a brief TWC to find out the terminal connected with the statement. Once the terminal is obtained the auditor lists (L & N) for the E. Purp F-1, 2 & 3 R3R Triple on each after it's listed. If no terminal can be found the auditor would have to L & N for the intention of someone who would (R/S statement). The Wants Handled Rundown is shown in Cases B, C and F. The important points of the RD are to run it as a "wants to get rid of" not a "wants to achieve" and to complete each thing the pc wants handled before going on. Handling of each thing the pc wants handled is dictated by what the "thing" is. A somatic is run R3R Triple. The intention connected with it can also be run. An intention is run R3R Triple. If it's a terminal, L & N for the intention connected with it and run it. You can also L & N and run the intentions on the other 2 flows. If it's a condition L & N W/W would have it then list for and run that terminal's intention. If it's a doingness L & N for the intention of someone who would do that and run it. Additional handling could be done such as PSEAIs double-assessed R3R Triple, handling it as a problem by finding and running out the prior confusion or tracing it back to the earlier problem it is a solution to and running that R3R Triple. Difficulties on this RD stem from not getting the thing the pc really wants handled which will read very well and run like a bomb, or errors in the L & N or R3R or out ethics holding the condition in place. The Multiple-Flow E. Purp Rundown is a very high-powered action which must be precisely done. Its use is covered in C/S Series 22 and Case C. It consists of F-1: L & N "What Evil Impulse have others had toward you?" R3R Triple. F-2: L & N "What Evil Impulse have you had toward others?" R3R Triple. F-3: L & N "What Evil impulse have others had toward others?" R3R Triple. 252 SUMMARY An Ex Dn programme is designed for an individual. C/Sing and auditing are done to achieve a product. When you're paralleling the mind the meter will be reading like mad, the pc will be wildly interested and the results will follow big and fast. With this broad change in Ex Dn I recommend that you re-listen to the Ex Dn tapes, review DMSMH and The Original Thesis as well as the '63 Time Track and R3R materials and re-study the Case Histories working out why each C/S and pgm was done. Better yet do a thorough Ex Dn C/S Course. I'm counting on you to really apply these materials and expect to see lots of good results. L. RON HUBBARD Founder LRH:ams.jh Copyright $c 1974 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 253  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=23/4/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=14/12/74 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 22R EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES   Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex Remimeo Ex Dn C/Ses HCO BULLETIN OF 23 APRIL 1974R REVISED 14 DECEMBER 1974 Expanded Dianetics Series 22R EXPANDED DIANETICS REQUISITES The recent review of Expanded Dianetics has shown that Ex Dn can be made to fail if the pc is improperly set up for it. The following checklist is for use by C/Ses to ensure full set-ups for Ex Dn have been done. Attach to the inside left cover of the folder. 1. Pc has done a full set of TRs 0-4 and 6-9. _______ 2. Pc has had a full battery of Objective Processes run to full EP. _______ 3. Pc has been given a thorough C/S 1 and is grooved in. _______ 4. Pc has completed (very) Drug RD which is FLAT. No no-interest but reading items remain unrun. No medicine, drug or stimulant left unrun. _______ 5. Pc successful at Dianetic Engram running. Can run Dn easily. _______ 6. Pc has had Word Clearing Method 1 run very flat to F/N list. _______ 7. Pc has been Word Cleared Method 5 on the L3ExDRB and R3R words. _______ 8. Pc has had any high or low TA handled with a C/S 53R1. _______ 9. Pc is not in the Non-Interference area. _______ 10. Pc has had any messed-up L & N and Why lists corrected. _______ 11. Pc has not been left in the middle of a major action or RD to start Ex Dn. _______ 12. Pc is getting Ex Dn after Dn, after Exp Gr 4 or after OT3. These are the only points Ex Dn is run on a case. _______ Only if you make sure each of these points is fully in will the pc fly on Ex Dn. LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 254  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 11 iDate=17/7/74 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=0 rDate=0/0/0 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 23 XDN CASE B   Remimeo  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 17 JULY 1974 Remimeo Expanded Dianetics Series 23 (Ref. XDn Series 9) XDN CASE B Further data on XDn Series 9. On further data the failure of this case was due to: 1. PTS to friend of wife who was violently invalidative. He roller coastered = PTS. The PTS scene should have been handled prior to auditing but was not known or suspected at the time. 2. This case had been a drug addict and was married to a drug addict who had been a prostitute and who persuaded him back on drugs. The drug rundown "no interest items" should have been run and he should have been cleaned up on drugs before beginning XDn. It has been proven out time and again that when a very full and complete drug rundown is not done, pcs do not succeed with any other type of auditing including Expanded Dianetics. FURTHER NOTES Further research has shown that headaches are almost invariably an Exteriorization-Interiorization problem. This research case should have had his Ext-Int handled fully. These items added to the research program, before any others, would have brought success: i. Handle Ext-Int by repair or rundown. ii. Handle any out lists L4B. iii. Handle PTS Situation fully and rapidly. iv. Complete Drug RD by culling all "no interest items" and running them. Further repair of this case would include the above but would add: v. Do an L4B on intentions lists to be sure no lists are out and repair. vi. Do R3R on all reading evil intentions whether pc interested or not. SUMMARY Data gained from running this Case B has been of great assistance in handling other cases since the faults found were not repeated. Hundreds, probably thousands of cases are now winning on XDn with permanent gain. This is due to using fully the developed tech with full skill. LRH:nt.rd L. RON HUBBARD Copyright $c 1974 Founder by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 255  L. RON HUBBARD Founder   Type = 12 iDate=27/3/75 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=10/9/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Expanded Dianetics Series 24R EX DN AND PTS RD NOTES   Remimeo Ex Dn Course Ex Dn Spclsts  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 27 MARCH 1975R Revised 10 September 1975 (Revision in this type style) Remimeo Ex Dn Course Ex Dn Spclsts Expanded Dianetics Series 24R EX DN AND PTS RD NOTES With the issuance of HCO B 17 March 1974, "TWC Checksheets -- TWC, Using Wrong Questions", certain Ex Dn procedures that were TWC became L&N. The commands were issued. PT ENVIRONMENT The listing question for PT Environment is "What terminals make up your present time environment?" (LRH). The question is listed and the item is handled by getting AEIs connected with it or about it and running them R3R Triple or Quad, to an F/Ning AEI assessment. That completes PT Environment handling. Where a pc has had PT Environment done by 2WC and later bogs, the C/S would note a possible out list and could have it corrected if it's out. INTENTIONS In doing an AEI Treble Assessment Intentions must be listed, L&N. This also follows from the 17 March 74 HCO B. The listing question would be "What intention is connected with _______?" An intention should not be listed from a significance but only from a terminal or mass. Where the item being listed is a significance the terminal must be found by L&N and then the intention of that terminal listed. The procedure on AEIs where Intentions has the LARGEST READ would be to L&N for the intention, R3R Triple or Quad, then go on to As or Es or reassess. It is highly unlikely that Intentions will continue to read on reassessment of AEIs. If this does happen suspect a wrong list and verify or correct. It could read on an Intention on another flow, but then Intentions can be listed Triple or Quad. QUAD EX DN When catching up unrun Flow Os on an Ex Dn completion it is usual to Quad the R3R items, leaving the L&N questions alone. Doing Flow 0 L&Ns where Flow 1, 2 and 3 were previously listed and run R3R, as with multiple flow Intentions or Evil Purposes, is not necessary on an Ex Dn completion and could bypass charge by overrunning the Grade. Where Intentions are listed Quad the Flow 0 question would be "What intention have you had towards yourself about _______?" 256 PTS RD The Flow 0 commands on the PTS RD would be as follows: R3R: "Locate a time when you did something to yourself because of _______." ARC BREAKS: "Did you have an ARC Break with yourself about _______?" PROBLEMS: "Did you give yourself a problem about _______?" WITHHOLDS: "Did you withhold anything from yourself about _______?" OVERTS: "Did you commit an overt on yourself about _______?" CAN'T HAVE/ENFORCED HAVE: 1. "What can't have did you run on yourself because of _______?" 2. "What did you try to force on yourself because of _______ that you didn't want?" Follow with Objective Hav. Revised by Msm J. Franks XDN C/S Flag for W/O Ron Shafran CS-4 for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:RS:JF:ah.rd Copyright$c 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 257  Revised by Msm J. Franks XDN C/S Flag for W/O Ron Shafran CS-4 for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=4/12/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=1 rDate=13/5/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Integrity Processing Series 1R DEFINITIONS   Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 4 DECEMBER 1972R Revised 13 May 1975 Remimeo Integrity Processing Series 1R DEFINITIONS INTEGRITY PROCESSING is that processing which increases a person's personal integrity and trust in himself and others by freeing him of past overts, withholds and missed withholds. DEFINITION: Overt -- A harmful or contra-survival act. Precisely, it is an act of commission or omission that harms the greater number of dynamics. DEFINITION: Withhold -- An undisclosed contra-survival act; a no action after the fact of action, in which the individual has done or been an accessory to doing something which is a transgression against some moral or ethical code consisting of agreements to which the individual has subscribed in order to guarantee, with others, the survival of a group with which he is co-acting or has co-acted toward survival. DEFINITION: Missed Withhold -- An undisclosed contra-survival act which has been restimulated by another but not disclosed. This is a withhold which another person nearly found out about, leaving the person with the withhold in a state of wondering whether his hidden deed is known or not. INTEGRITY is defined as: 1. The condition of having no part or element taken away or wanting; undivided or unbroken state; wholeness. 2. The condition of not being marred or violated; unimpaired or uncorrupted condition; soundness. 3. Soundness of moral principle; the character of uncorrupted virtue, especially in relation to truth and fair dealing; uprightness, honesty, sincerity. This relates to ETHICS which is defined as "the principles of right and wrong conduct and the specific moral choices to be made by the individual in his relationship with others". Thus we see that a person who acts against his own moral codes and the mores of the group violates his integrity and is said to be out-ethics. Such acts are called overts. A person having committed an overt and then withholding the fact of that overt, and withholding himself from committing further overts, will individuate from the group. The group itself will then lose integrity as it becomes divided and lacks wholeness. Integrity Processing is therefore that processing which enables a person, within the reality of his own moral codes and those of the group, to reveal his overts so he no longer requires to withhold and so enhances his own integrity and that of the group. DEVELOPMENT In the early '60s LRH developed the technology known as Sec Checking. As issued it was used for two purposes: as a general processing tool to clean up a pc's overts and withholds and as a security tool to detect out-ethics persons and security risks. 261 In 1970 this technology was refined and issued under the name of Confessionals. In 1972 a complete update was done of basic O/W tech and the earlier procedures of Sec Checking and Confessionals. A new technology emerged -- Integrity Processing. Recently Integrity Processing has been reviewed as to its workability and most optimum usage by LRH and certain revisions have been made. USAGE Integrity processing has two uses. Its basic use is as a tool for pc case gain, increase in responsibility and case progress. As such it belongs at Exp Grade II on the Grade Chart. You can't expect a pc with unhandled Drugs, who can't communicate because others don't really exist (Grade O), and who is caved in by problems (Grade I) that he hasn't even cognited on, to have enough responsibility to answer up on O/Ws (Grade II). Therefore, Integ as a full RD goes at Exp Grade II. It is usually programmed to be done at or towards the end of the Grade and a full battery of Integ lists are used. It is not a mandatory Grade II Exp process, but is recommended. The second use of Integrity processing is as an ethics or security measure. It is used here as part of staff requirements or when a security clearance is needed. As such it has no case prerequisites and is not subject to such things as the Drug RD rule as it is not being used for pc case gain. Only one or at most two Integ lists would be used. When used as an ethics or security measure, Integ can be done as auditing in a session (and is therefore subject to the Auditor's Code), or can be done as a straight security action, not "in session". In the case of the latter, the person must be informed that he isn't being audited. The technical procedure in either case would be the same. It is noted that use of Integ as a non-session security measure or in the case of severe out-ethics is rare, and nothing here condones misuse or abuse of Integrity processing as a security or ethics action. Such misuse would be itself subject to immediate and severe Ethics action as it would constitute an extreme betrayal of trust. HISTORICAL PRECEDENCE -- RELIGIOUS CONFESSION The need for a person to be able to morally cleanse himself by confession of sins has long been recognized in religion. The Buddhist monk 2,500 years ago was permitted to confess and seek expiation for "acts of censure". The penalty for failure to confess was loss of the rights and privileges of a monk. This was enforcement of the natural law that he who commits actions against the codes or mores of the group separates himself from that group. The Bible, in the Books of James and John, calls for the confession of sins. Early Christian handling of confession was largely concerned with disciplinary aspects. The sinner had to wear sackcloth, make his bed in ashes, and fast. This went on for a time proportionate to the gravity of the offence, sometimes for years. Certain sins were previously considered too serious for forgiveness and therefore not open to confession, but a gradual leniency developed as in the case of Calixtus, Bishop of Rome 217-222, who decided to admit adulterers to exomologesis (Greek for public confession). In the 4th Century at Rome and Constantinople we hear of "penitentiaries" -- priests appointed to act for the Bishop in hearing the confession of sins and deciding whether public discipline was necessary. Due to some misuse of public confession, individual private confession became more prominent in the 5th Century. 262 In 1215 the Council of the Lateran ruled that everyone must make confession at least once a year before his parish priest. In Confession as now administered in Christian Churches the disciplinary penance is often little more than nominal, stress being laid rather on the fullness of the confession. Thus for at least 2,500 years confession has played an important role in religious practice. Throughout the centuries two points of question have arisen which led to some unpopularity of confession. One was the possible misuse of information disclosed in public confession, hence the development of private confession before an authorized person whose code of conduct prevented misuse. The other was the infliction of disciplinary action as atonement for the sins confessed. But the latter goes beyond the realm of personal morals and ethics into justice. Confession itself, and the need for some form of confession has not been in question. With Integrity Processing Scientology follows in the tradition of religion. This processing enables the individual to confess to overts without duress. It is done with a qualified Auditor bound by the Auditor's Code. Disciplinary action forms no part of the processing. The technology by which Integrity Processing is delivered is new. It is not the same as any earlier technology either in Scientology or other religion. It does however follow in the longstanding tradition of religion in providing a means for the individual to admit to and take responsibility for transgression against the mores of the group and so regain a spiritual and moral integrity. Compiled from LRH briefings and materials Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 Revised by W/O Ron Shafran CS-4 Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:RS:AL:MG:BL:clb.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 263  Compiled from LRH briefings and materials Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 Revised by W/O Ron Shafran CS-4 Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=5/12/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=13/5/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Integrity Processing Series 2RA PROCEDURE   Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 5 DECEMBER 1972RA Revised 13 May 1975 Remimeo Integrity Processing Series 2RA PROCEDURE Integrity Processing must be done only by a well trained auditor, skilled in TRs, basic auditing and metering, who can make a prepared list read, and who has been fully checked out and drilled on these techniques. As an auditing action it is done in model session with Rudiments in. Every reading question of an Integrity Processing Form is F/Ned. The actual form question must be taken to F/N, not some other question. Here is the basic procedure for Integrity Processing: 1. Set up the room, chairs, table, etc., as you would for any auditing session with all admin to hand, worksheet paper, Integ Form you will use, etc. 2. Make sure your pc's hands are not too dry or moist, the cans are the correct size and the pc knows how to hold them. Ref. False TA HCO Bs. 3. Start the session and fly a Rud if no F/N. If TA high or low do not try to fly a Rud but do a C/S Series 53RJ, assess and handle. If you are not trained in doing a C/S Series 53, end off for C/S instruction. 4. Put in any needed R-Factor on doing Integrity Processing. 5. Clear the procedure and the use of the buttons "suppress" and "false" etc. If necessary as an example run a non-significant question to demonstrate the procedure (e.g. Have you ever eaten an apple?). 6. Take up the first question and clear the words backwards, then the full command noting any read while clearing, which is valid. See BTB 2 May 72R, "Clearing Commands", and HCO B 28 Feb 71, C/S Series 24, "Metering Reading Items". Then, as needed, groove in the question further by asking for the time period the question would cover, the activities and people that would be involved, etc. This will steer the pc to the area and bring it into view. 7. With good TR 1 give the pc the first question, keeping an eye on the meter and noting any instant read. Even the smallest change of characteristic is checked in Integrity Processing and that question taken up if it develops into an "SF", "F", "LF" or "LFBD". 8. Take up each reading question getting the who, what, when and where of every overt, going earlier similar to F/N. Get specifics, not general or vague answers. If the pc gives off another's overt ask him if he ever did something like that. You want what the pc has done. 9. TAKE THE ORIGINAL READING QUESTION TO F/N. Not some other question. Always repeat the original question as part of the earlier similar command to keep the pc on that question. 10. If the question does not read and does not F/N put in Suppress on the question (and if necessary Invalidate, Abandoned, Not-Is, etc.) asking, "On the 264 question _______ has anything been suppressed?" and noting any instant read. If Suppress (or one of the other buttons read) has read it means the read has transferred from the question to the button, so take up the question as in 8 above to F/N. If there is no read on the buttons the question should just F/N. After the question is taken to F/N there is no need to then check Suppress. Just go on to the next question. 11. If the pc gets critical realize you have missed a withhold and pull the MWH. 12. If an R/S occurs note it large and clear on the worksheets and then circle it in red after session with the statement or question on which it occurred. Note the fact on the Auditor Report Form and Program Sheet with session date and W/S page. 13. If a reading question does not go to F/N and bogs or the TA goes high, take up an L1RA (Integ Repair List), assess and handle per instructions. 14. EXAMINER. All Integrity Processing sessions must be followed immediately by a standard Pc Examination. 15. On any Bad Exam Report (non-F/N, BIs or non-optimum statement) after an Integ session, or on any pc who gets sick or upset or does not do well or has a high or low TA, give an L1RA as the next action. The 24 Hour Red Tag Rule must be strictly enforced. In the case of a pc requiring an L1RA the Case Supervisor would also look for evidence of questions F/Ned on something else, unflat questions, or withholds gotten off more than once. A poor or comm lag TR 2, hidden from the view of the C/S, can also mess up a pc on Integ as it invalidates his answers and makes him feel he hasn't gotten it off. If suspected this could be checked by D of P interview or pc to Exams: "What did the auditor do?" 16. The Integrity Form is complete when all questions on the Form have been handled as above and all reading questions taken to an F/N on that question. SUMMARY If this procedure is followed and the Integrity Processing done with good TRs and metering the pc will get great results and regain abilities. Originally reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 Revised & Reissued by CS-4 Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides and the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:RS:AL:MG:clb.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974, 1975 by L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 265  by Flag Mission 1234 Revised & Reissued by CS-4 Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides and the Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY   Type = 12 iDate=8/12/72 Volnum=0 Issue=0 Rev=2 rDate=13/5/75 Addition=0 aDate=0/0/0 aRev=0 arDate=0/0/0  Integrity Processing Series 3RA, 4R, 5RA INTEGRITY PROCESSING AND O/Ws REPAIR LIST L1RA   Remimeo  BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN 8 DECEMBER 1972RA Revised 13 May 1975 Remimeo Integrity Processing Series 3RA, 4R, 5RA INTEGRITY PROCESSING AND O/Ws REPAIR LIST L1RA (Cancels BTB 6 Dec 72R, integrity Processing Series 3R, "Hi-Lo TA Assessment for Integrity Processing and Confessionals", and BTB 7 Dec 72, Integrity Processing Series 4, "Mid-Integrity Processing Short Assessment".) This is the standard correction/repair list for O/W actions such as Confessionals, Integrity Processing, O/W Write-ups, O/W Meter Checks and Sec Checks. In Integrity Processing this list is used in the event of a BER after an Integ session, if the pc gets sick or upset or falls on his head, or if an Integ session bogs. This action is a 24 HOUR REPAIR PRIORITY. The list is assessed Method 5 and all reading items fully handled to F/N per the instructions given. Prefix the assessment with a time limiter (e.g. "In this session", "In that Integrity Processing", etc.). PRECLEAR: ______________________________________________ DATE: _______________ AUDITOR: ______________________________________________ TA: _______________ 0. WAS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE METER OR CANS? _______ False TA handling. 1. OUT INT. _______ Int RD Correction List or Int RD, if Went In or Go In read. 2. LIST ERROR. _______ L4BR and handle. 3. WERE YOU TIRED OR HUNGRY? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 4. HAD YOU RECENTLY TAKEN DRUGS MEDICINE ALCOHOL? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. Note for C/S. 5. DID YOU HAVE AN ARC BREAK? _______ ARCU, CDEINR E/S to F/N. 6. DID YOU HAVE A PROBLEM? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 7. HAS A WITHHOLD BEEN MISSED? _______ Pull it getting who nearly found out, etc. E/S to F/N 8. HAD YOU TOLD ALL? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. Indicate it if so. 9. DID YOU HAVE TO GET THE SAME W/Hs OFF MORE THAN ONCE? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 266 10. SOMEONE DEMANDED A W/H YOU DIDN'T HAVE? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. Indicate it if so. 11. WAS THERE A FALSE ACCUSATION? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 12. WAS ANYTHING SUPPRESSED? _______ Clean it up E/S to F/N. 13. WAS ANYTHING INVALIDATED? _______ Clean it up E/S to F/N. 14. WAS ANYTHING PROTESTED? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 15. WAS THERE ANY EVALUATION? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 16. HAS SOMETHING BEEN MISUNDERSTOOD? _______ Clean it up, clearing any mis-u words each to F/N. 17. WAS A QUESTION LEFT UNFLAT? _______ Find out which one, indicate it, flatten it. 18. HAS AN OVERT BEEN PROTESTED? _______ Get what it was and get in Protest button on it, check for E/S. 19. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMING UP? _______ Get who wouldn't accept it, who said it still read. Indicate false read. 2wc the concern. 20. WAS THERE AN EARLIER OVERT UNDISCLOSED? _______ Pull it and clean it up E/S to F/N. 21. ARE YOU WITHHOLDING ANYTHING? _______ Get what it is E/S to F/N. 22. WERE YOU WORRIED ABOUT REPUTATION? _______ Clean it up 2wc E/S to F/N. 23. ARE THERE OPINIONS YOU DON'T DARE SAY? _______ Get what. 2wc E/S to F/N. 24. ARE YOU HERE FOR UNDISCLOSED REASONS? _______ Find out why he's here, 2wc E/S to F/N. Note for further handling. 25. WERE YOU AFRAID OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 26. WAS THERE AN INJUSTICE? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 27. WAS THERE A BETRAYAL? _______ 2wc E/S to F/N. 28. HAD SOMETHING BEEN OVERRUN? _______ Get what, rehab. 29. WAS SOME ACTION UNNECESSARY? _______ Find out what it is. Indicate it if so. E/S to F/N. 30. WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? _______ If so and it doesn't clean up on 2wc, GF M5 and handle. 31. HAS THE UPSET BEEN HANDLED? _______ 2wc. If so indicate it to F/N. Originally reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 Revised by W/O Ron Shafran, CS-4 Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY BDCS:RS:clb.rd Copyright $c 1972, 1974, 1975 By L. Ron Hubbard ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 267  Originally reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234 Revised by W/O Ron Shafran, CS-4 Approved by Commodore's Staff Aides Board of Issues for the BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY