FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

LRH EDs - THE BLUE VOLUMES - 20/28

============================

This is the Second Foundation. Our purpose is to keep
LRH's plan on track (ref: Asimov).

CofS has gone off the rails. This is an announcement of 
our support of FZBA, Freezone, and The Pilot.

We are posting the LRH EDs to make ammends for our long
delay in taking action.

ARC,

PROGRAM DIRECTOR
SECOND FOUNDATION


============================

LRH EDs - THE BLUE VOLUMES

This is a complete copy of the "Original LRH EDs" or Blue 
Volumes as issued by Bridge in 1983. The full contents
for all 28 parts posted is in part 1.

The volumes were divided into the 3 numbering Series, and 
subdivided into the classes of EDs (INT = International, 
WW = World Wide, SH = Saint Hill, etc.) and placed in reverse 
order (latest first) within type. This was quite confusing
because of some EDs being in multiple classes with different
numbers in each class.

We rearranged everything in date order (earliest first) to
give a better historical perspective and make these easy
to find by date. The original table of contents is included 
in part 2 and the original page numbers are in "[]" at the 
beginning of each ED.

See IMB 5 in part 2 for an explanation of the 3 Series of ED
numbers and a list of valid (but expired) EDs not included.
See LRH ED 345 INT in part 28 for a list of cancelled LRH EDs
that were not included.

These are only the EDs that are in the Blue Volumes.

**************************************************

FZBA STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


Part 20

462 ED 168 INT 27 Jan 72 ESTABLISHMENT OFFICERS
463 ED 169 INT 27 Jan 72 IMPORTANT P/L
464 ED 171 INT 18 Feb 72 SUBJECT = SURVEY = RESPONSE
465 ED 173 INT 20 Mar 72 PROD-ORG SYSTEM and the EST O
466 ED 174 INT 29 Mar 72 STUDY AND TECH BREAKTHROUGH
467 ED 175 INT 4 Apr 72 TECH DIV PRIMARY RUNDOWN
468 ED 176 INT 24 Apr 72 AUDITOR RECOVERY
469 ED 178 INT 30 May 72 SUPER-LITERACY
470 ED 1 PUBS 29 Jul 72 CATALOGUE PROJECT
471 ED 181 INT 7 Sep 72 EVALUATION
472 ED 182 INT 11 Nov 72 A SUCCESS STORY
473 ED 205 INT 28 Sep 73 TRANSFER OF GUARDIAN FUNCTIONS
474 ED 214 INT 14 Dec 73 RON'S JOURNAL 4 FUEL AND THE WORLD
475 ED 1 UK 14 Dec 73 "...UTILIZE THE PUBLIC'S FREE..."
476 ED 215 INT 15 Dec 73 LARGEST PAINTING


===========================
462 ED 168 INT 27 Jan 72 ESTABLISHMENT OFFICERS
[p. 274-5]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 168 INT 27 January 1972

To: C/Os 
EDs 
EXECUTIVES
ALL STAFF

SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OFFICERS, An Answer to HCOs.
SPECIAL OFFER

Reference: LRH ED 159 INT

Note: TEOs, QEOs are called for in LRH ED 159 INT. This
requirement is relieved if the following program is done.


The ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER is one who establishes a DIVISION.

As a Deputy of the HAS but in the Division under its
secretary, the Establishment Officer puts in the divisional
personnel, lines, materiel and trains, hats and maintains
and expands the established division to the benefit of the
org and its staff.

The majority of the EstOs trained so far have shown that
this action has a direct and continual effect on stats and GI.

There are now courses for Establishment Officers of each of
the seven divisions: ExecEO, HCOEstO, DEO, TREO, TEO, QEO,
and PEG.

To relieve your org of much of the expense of sending TEO
and QEO trainees to Flag you may accept the following
alternative:

1. Take a staff executive who held the fort and kept
things going while others were off being trained in 1971,
or take your highest stat exec.

2. Send him to Flag for the Flag FEBC.

3. We will crash train him as a full Exec.

4. We will train him how to train Est Officers.

5. We will provide him with the full checksheets and packs 
of all seven EstOs.

6. We will return him as a missionaire to recruit and get 
in the EstO system in your org fully.

7. When he has done so successfully we will appoint him
Flag Representative to your org with the duty of giving you
the full benefit of Flag-CLO-Org system and the maintenance
of the EstO system.

In a small org it may require some time to build up to
seven EstOs. BUT IT CAN BE DONE.

Any on policy org in any area, by actual continual proof
expands with prosperity and success to all.

The main reason any division or org falters is that its
divisional functions fall out. When these are not
continually established the org ceases to prosper.

At first the EstOs may have to be double or triple hatted -
taking on two or three divisions. This begins the
expansion and soon they become single division EstOs.

This EstO program is developed as a Flag validation for
those who stayed home and kept the store.

Mostly SO people will now be trained at Flag in the higher
Executive levels. The FEBC is being taught now at the SHs
for top org executives.

In applying for FEBC EstO on Flag it must be attested that
the candidate

1. Actually held the fort successfully while others were
trained (or if no one in the org was sent for senior Exec
Courses, that the person was a mainstay of at least a
division).

2. Must have return airfare.

3. Must have had case gain.

4. Must not be connected to antagonistic people or involved 
in problems or debts.

This will make it easier for you to get TEOs and QEOs as
per LRH ED 159 INT.

If any TEO or QEO is enroute to Flag or at Flag, never
fear, he will be trained and returned on schedule.

This is just an extra something. A salute to those who
kept the wheels going. We would not trust everyone to
train EstOs.

So treat this as a special offer that is not likely to be 
repeated.

(Write or Telex Dissem Sec Flag via the Flag Reg at your
nearest CLO.)


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:gal

NOTE: LRH ED 159 INT was cancelled by LRH ED 236 INT



===========================
463 ED 169 INT 27 Jan 72 IMPORTANT P/L
[p. 273]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 169 INT 27 January 1972

To: C/Os and EDs 
Executives

References: LRH EDs 145R, 153, 154, 159, 161, 163, 165,
168 INTERNATIONAL

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 JANUARY 1972 AD22 ADMIN KNOW HOW 29
EXECUTIVE SERIES 5 "NOT DONES, HALF DONES AND BACKLOGS"


IMPORTANT P/L


Any troubles you may be having with getting in the LRH EDs
listed above are answered in the new P/L "NOT DONES, HALF
DONES AND BACKLOGS".

This policy letter was developed by carefully inspecting
two major areas and body traffic in HCOs.

The condition of many Dissem Div CFs is a striking example
of this P/L.

If your org has any areas of apathy in it or if any part of
it is going frantic this P/L and the program in it is your
immediate answer.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:mes:gal


===========================
464 ED 171 INT 18 Feb 72 SUBJECT = SURVEY = RESPONSE
[p. 272]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 171 INT 18 February 1972

To: Div 2 
Div 6

SUBJECT = SURVEY = RESPONSE


Reference: LRH ED 161 INT of 18 Dec 71 "Surveys are the
Key to Stats and Survey Promo Mini Hat." LRH ED 170 INT of
20 Jan 72 "Survey Campaign Project No. 1"

A very convincing example of the VITAL NECESSITY of
surveying if you want ANY response from your Promo is
illustrated by a report just received from Celebrity Center.

1. Three BIG names were to appear for a Scientology show
on a big college campus. The campus was flooded with promo
for which no survey was done. Only 80 people turned up for
their show.

2. One week later another Scientology show SURVEYED and
found the tone level (ANXIETY) and put up posters only. 
(Far less promo than the first show.)

THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY PEOPLE TURNED UP for the show and
six raw public promptly signed up.

SURVEY DONE AND SURVEYS USED

STATS UP

One org with Power Trend has done nothing without survey.

The closed door against which some orgs are banging their
heads is lack of surveys.

GET A SURVEY TEAM.

HAT IT WITH THE ABOVE EDs.

GET BIG AND PROSPEROUS!

Love,

Ron


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:mes:gal


===========================
465 ED 173 INT 20 Mar 72 PROD-ORG SYSTEM and the EST O
[p. 269-71]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 173 INT 28 March 1972

To All Staff

Subject: PROD-ORG SYSTEM and the EST O BACK-UP SYSTEM

References: FEBC Tapes
Est O Series Policy Letters


It is vital to clarify the relationship between the Product
Org Officer System and the new Establishment Officer
Back-Up System.

THE ONLY THING CHANGED IN THE PRODUCT-ORG OFFICER SYSTEM IS
THE ROLE OF THE HAS.

All other parts and duties of the Prod-Org System as taught
on the FEBC and as contained in FEBC tapes up to and
including Tape No. 7 IS TOTALLY VALID and is still in FULL USE.

FEBC Tapes 8, 9 and 10 are cancelled. They deal with the HAS.

These tapes (FEBC 8, 9 and 10 only) are replaced by the
ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER TAPE SERIES.

The situation was this. The Product Org System would send
an org into a boom. In the scramble to get the Product,
the Product Officer and Org Officer would disestablish the
org. The HAS was unable to put an org there fast enough to
expand, being only one secretary and being hit by all
divisions.

In actual fact, HCO never had full Establishment duties
before this. (Tech for instance hired and trained its own
auditors, divisional sees trained their own staffs.) This
sudden overload of new duties plus the overload of trying
to Establish an expanding org being hammered by the Product
Officer and Org Officer, collapsed HCO.

HCO has its own duties and products as given by the org
board and policy. Having here been unburdened IT MUST NOW
MAINTAIN THESE.

HASes who tried are thanked. They should get busy and get
HCO producing its products per org board.


EST Os

The Establishment Officer Back-Up System puts enough
personnel into the org and its Divisions (the Establishment
Officers) to solidly maintain the form of the org and its
divisions rapidly enough to keep up with the Prod Org System.

They post and hat toward production, take care of spaces,
lines, files and generally keep the form there.

They do not get out the products of the division. They
keep the staff well enough hatted and handled to do so.


ORG OFFICERS

A new situation has just been exposed to view.

Where an org's Org Officer or a division's Org Officer is
removed, the division, no matter how upstat, promptly
collapses. This has happened uniformly each time it has
happened.

THIS MEANS THE PROD-ORG SYSTEM IS A SUCCESS. It is
responsible for increasing production and the state of the
org or division.

By adding an Establishment Officer to each division, whose
duties are wholly Establishment, the Product and Org
Officers are freed up to produce and work on production and
are not pulled down the org board.

When the org officer is transferred over to be an Est O,
then production is defeated.

Only when the Org Officer is left on post to do his job of
organizing production for the Product Officer does the
division or org maintain its stats.

When an Org Officer also has to handle staff as individuals
he is thought to "move too slowly" to keep pace with the
Product Officer. The org officer was overburdened.


BALANCE

The two systems do not conflict.

They hold Production and Organization in balance so that
progress can be made.

HCOP/L 7 Mar 72 Est O Series No. 1 is being revised to
retain the Org Officer and to mesh the Prod-Org System in
with the Est O Back-Up System. The changes are the Deputy
ED role. He will remain the Org Officer.


SUMMARY

These advices are released to

(1) Tell you what is the Est O System and

(2) To preserve the Prod Org System

(3) To settle any confusions that might exist.

(4) To point out the way to increasing stats without undue
org stresses setting in.


In essence, if you read "Est O Back-Up System" for HAS in
the FEBC tapes you have a rough conversion and the scope of
the change.

To this is added a valuable fact, the Est O Back-Up System
includes valuable never before known administrative tech
for the handling of orgs and staffs and is valuable in its
own right.

And so is the Prod-Org System! That has suddenly been
proven in reverse! When you tamper with it, a collapse can
occur!

The Est O system by itself, with no Prod Org System, can
push up Stats but at once all seniors overload from
increased production and the only remedy is a fast use or
resumption of the Prod Org System as taught on the FEBC
(less tapes 8, 9, 10 and 11) plus the Est O tapes just made.

With these TWO forces, the Prod-Org working behind
production, and the Est O working behind Establishment THE
SKY IS NOT HIGH ENOUGH TO GRAPH THE STATS.

Use Both!


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:mes:gal


===========================
466 ED 174 INT 29 Mar 72 STUDY AND TECH BREAKTHROUGH
[p. 265-8]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 174 INT 29 March 1972

HIGHEST PRIORITY

To: Executive Directors 
Assistant/Guardians for Tech
Deputy Guardians 
Tech Sees 
Directors of Training 
Qual Secs
Cramming Officers

Subject: STUDY AND TECH BREAKTHROUGH

References:

HCO PL 7 Feb 65 Keeping Scientology Working 
HCO B 21 Jul 71 Word Clearing Correction List (Revised 9 Aug 71) 
HCO B 31 Dec 71 C/S Series 53RRR (3rd Revision 22 Mar 72) 
HCO B 4 Feb 72 Study Correction List (2nd Revision 25 Feb 72) 
HCO B 22 Feb 72 Word Clearing Series 32R (Revised 26 Mar 72) 
HCO PL 7 Mar 72 Course Supervisors Issue II
HCO PL 16 Mar 72 High Crime - What is a Course Issue V


LRH COMMS OR A/Gs TO ENFORCE AND COMPLETE RAPIDLY.

The QUALITY of Auditing and Administration BOTH depend on
STUDY OF MATERIALS.

Therefore the accurate application of STUDY TECH REGULATES
THE QUALITY OF Auditing and Admin results.

An on policy, on tech org booms. This has been proven continually.

LONG TERM OBSERVATION: When Study Tech is in full use
without any misses the Student completes and is a
successful graduate and uses the materials studied.

SITUATION: Some failures in Tech and Admin in some areas.

DATA: Investigating failed students and blown students it
has been uniformly found that THEY WERE IMPROPERLY COURSE
SUPERVISED.

A further investigation showed that in some courses the
Course Super was (a) not present at all or (b) popped in
occasionally or (c) was there but doing admin or his own
work at his desk or (d) that even if he observed his
students he did not use Study Tech on them.

Further investigation found that when a student asked a
question about the meaning of his materials the Course Super
would try to answer it and WISHED HE WAS AN EXPERT ON THE
SUBJECT OF THE COURSE! But he did not know enough Study
Tech to get the student cleaned up on words the student had
not understood.

When forced to clear up such missed words on a meter, it
was found he did not know enough to look at the meter when
asking a question, did not know his TRs, and could not
recognize when a student was cleaned up and had very good
indicators and so kept on asking the question.

Search then revealed that behind each failed or blown
student traced, Study Tech had not been known or used by
his Course Supervisor.

An inspection of Supervisors found that they were not using
Study Tech, each one for a different "reason" and each of
the reasons traced back to their ignorance of it.

WHY: STUDY TECH NOT IN USE FOR INDIVIDUAL WHYS FOR EACH
SUPERVISOR AND STUDENT.

STATS: In those orgs where Study Tech is not in full use
the stats are low. In areas where Study Tech has been in
full continual use the Stats have remained high. Stats of
areas have declined after Study Tech dropped out. Stats of
training activities where Study Tech began to go in rose.

IDEAL SCENE: Every student completing every course he
entered and becoming a high quality successful graduate
using the materials he studied.


HANDLING:

1. There have been many WHYs found on the subject of
students and discarded as not leading to full correction. 
But amongst these a fact emerged THAT STUDY TECH IS THE
ONLY DIANETIC OR SCIENTOLOGY COURSE MATERIAL STUDIED BEFORE
STUDY TECH IS KNOWN. It has therefore been studied without
the student (or the Supervisor) being given Study Tech. 
This is one of the more general Individual WHYs and can be
remedied by this requirement:

The Student Hat and the Study Tapes are required to be done
TWICE before the student begins to study any other
materials on any course. The first time through, each word
in the Student Hat or Study Tapes he does not know, he must
look up and use and Method 4 word clearing must be used
thoroughly the first time through the Student Hat or Study
Tapes. He is then checked out for misunderstoods and these
are handled. He must then go through the materials a
second time, USING Study Tech throughout them. He must
then pass an examination that will disclose any further
misunderstoods. If these show up he must again do the
Student Hat and Study Tapes.

Any student now in study who is slow or glib to do this
without proceeding further.

(His study thereafter should be much more rapid and
successful - providing Study Tech is still used. The
Product here is An Able Student Who Knows How to Study.)
COURSE SUPERVISORS, D of T _____.


2. The C/O or Executive Director of the org WITHOUT
REDUCING COURSE SUPERVISION must directly and at once find
the Why on EACH Course Supervisor and D of T that he is not
using Study Tech to the fullest extent and remedy that WHY.
Avoid any PR or "that's not the Why, it's these students."
Get a Study Correction List HCO B 4 Feb 72 reissued 25 Feb
72 done on each Supervisor and the D of T and fully
handled. If a high or low TA prevents this get a C/S 53RRR
HCOB 31 Dec 71 revised 22 Mar 72 done and handled first.

(Sample WHYs actually found on Supervisors: Super A: Off
Source, learned from watching another Super and not from
Study Tech. Remedy: As in 1 above. Super B: Misunderstood 
word at start of tape. A word never looked up. Blanked out 
the rest of the series. Remedy: Get this and every other 
word on tape defined and then listen to to them using Study 
Tech. Super C: Big button on Control and does not want to 
control others. Remedy: Objective Processes especially SCS. 
Super D: Studied HPCSC with only Intention to apply Study 
data to self and not to others. Remedy: Hidden Standard 
Handling. - note that each Super has a different reason 
not to use Study tapes and materials and each requires 
specific handling of that WHY.)

Includes TR and Advance Course Supervisors. ALL Supervisors 
in the Org. EST O or QUAL SEC _____.


3. Groove in a Dept of Personnel Enhancement that can
Word Clear 1 and CAN AND DOES USE A WORD CLEARING
CORRECTION LIST HCO B 21 July 71 Revised 9 August 71. Make
sure the word clearers have good TRs, can use a meter and
assess and everything. QUAL SEC _____.


4. Require Word Clear 1 as a prerequisite of any and all
Course study on students. This comes before Study Tapes or
Student Hat and does not waive the requirement in one. It
can be at Student rates and at a locally set price but in
any case not less than $250 net. WC Correction List is Free.
REGISTRARS _____.


5. Get more Course Supers. HAS _____.


6. Word Clear 1 the Course Supers and remembering to use
a WC Corr List. 
D OF T and CRAMMING OFFICER, QUAL SEC _____.


7. Do a Study Correction List on Course Supers and D of
T and Cramming Officer and Handle. QUAL SEC _____.


8. Check out Course Supers, D of T and Cramming Officer
on Meters and Instant Reads and HCO B 22 Feb 72 Revised 26
Mar 72 (do not use the original issue but use the Revised
one), WC Series 32R. QUAL SEC _____.

9. Check out Course Super, D of T and Cramming Officer
TRs and be sure they can do them. QUAL SEC _____.


10. Put Course Supers, D of T and Cramming Officer through
Study Tapes and Student Hat twice as in 1 above. 
QUAL SEC _____.


11. Find the WHY on Students and keep the points of this
program in on all tech and Admin Courses. 
D OF T & COURSE SUPERVISORS _____.


NOTES: Programs to keep this in and assist Course
Supervision and assemble all Study Tech are in progress of
preparation in the Training and Services Bureau and will be
issued routinely.

The stat will eventually be changed to validate the product
of a successful graduate who applies the materials learned.

MEANWHILE THE STUDY POINT STAT MAY BE FINED 50,000 POINTS
FOR EVERY MISUNDERSTOOD WORD FOUND IN MATERIALS STUDIED ON
COURSE ON ANY "COMPLETED" OR BLOWING STUDENT AFTER 1 MAY
1972 BY A QUAL SEC, CRAMMING OFFICER OR STUDENT EXAMINER.

WARNING: In doing this Investigation and making these
remedies the Course Supervisors who had been flubbing,
outspokenly rejected this WHY and it was not until the
Individual WHYs on them had been found that they heartily
began to cooperate. Therefore you should not be surprised
at initial resistance to this program. When it is done
your tech and Admin problems in the org will rapidly
decline and your stats will soar!

A good Academy or Class fills up!

Even if you think your Courses are great, DO IT.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:mes:bk


===========================
467 ED 175 INT 4 Apr 72 TECH DIV PRIMARY RUNDOWN
[p. 263-4]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 175 INT 4 April 1972

To: Executive Directors 
Assistant/Guardians for Tech
Deputy Guardians 
Tech Sees 
Directors of Training 
Qual Secs
Cramming Officers

Subject: TECH DIV PRIMARY RUNDOWN

References: 

HCO PL 7 Feb 65 KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING
HCO B 21 Jul 71 (Revised 9 Aug 71) WORD CLEARING CORRECTION LIST 
HCO B 31 Dec 71 (3rd Revision 22 Mar 72) C/S Series 53RRR 
HCO B 4 Feb 72 (2nd Revision 25 Feb 72) STUDY CORRECTION LIST 
HCO B 22 Feb 72 (Revised 26 Mar 72) Word Clearing Series 32R
HCO PL 7 Mar 72 Issue II COURSE SUPERVISORS 
HCO PL 16 Mar 72 Issue V HIGH CRIME - WHAT IS A COURSE? 
HCO B 4 Apr 72 PRIMARY RD


It is not intended that all basic study actions (Primary
Rundowns) be off loaded on Qual.

If you note, the Qual RD is the PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN.

You do not correct until something has been done that needs
to be corrected.

Thus the Tech Div (containing Dept of Tech Services (10),
Dept of Training (11) and Dept of Processing (12)) is and
must continue to be able to deliver all training and
processing for which the org is classed (i.e. what level on
the Grade Chart it is allowed to train to and audit to).

Word Clearing of all types and kinds must be an HGC auditor
skill or else a frequent change of auditors will occur and
line jams will occur.

There is a tendency on the part of some Divisions to
offload their duties onto other areas of the org.

Example: One org "offloaded" 506 public pcs by sending
some of them to medical doctors, some ethics and some to
Cramming! And then its ED said it had no pc backlog! It
had of course 506. Not one of those pcs should have gone
anywhere else. They should have been processed fully in
the HGC! There went their satisfied customers and their GI!

In other words, the Division that dumps its functions dumps
the org!

There are a billion ways to do something wrongly. There is
usually only one way to do it right. The right way is the
one that is sensible and effective and gets the product.

All the variations are complicated, involved, consume
valuable time.


PRIMARY RD

The Tech Div's PRIMARY RD is NOT the Primary Correction RD.

The full Tech Div's Primary Rundown is given in HCOB 4 April 72.

LRH ED 174 INT IS AN EMERGENCY ACTION TO GET COURSES AND
STUDY ON THE ROAD.

As per Tgt 11 of 174 INT, the Dept of Training at once
gives students and all new students the full correct
clearing of words on the Study Tapes and Student Hat and
the HGC gives Word Clearing No. 1 as routine auditing.

Qual is supposed to catch dropped balls. When they are
caught the function returns to its proper division.


ETHICS

In Investigating situations on this matter, I have come up
with a basic why on all org troubles with staff and tech.

WHY: WORD CLEARING IS NOT USED ON ORDERS AND MATERIALS BY
STUDENTS OR STAFFS. THE GENERAL SOCIAL LEVEL OF EDUCATION
IS SO POOR THAT STAFFS ARE UNSUSPECTEDLY WALLOWING IN
UNCLEARED WORDS. THUS THEY FAIL TO FOLLOW ORDERS TO GET IN
STUDY TECH BECAUSE THEY HAVE MIS-U WORDS ON THE ORDERS!

This would be a consequence of Study Tech being out. Orders
to get it in also go out before it is in.

Therefore HCO PL 4 April 72 is being issued that makes it
an Ethics offense to study without study tech or to fail to
clear words in orders or issues that have not been understood.

STUDY TECH MUST GO IN STRAIGHT OR THE SCENE WON'T IMPROVE.

So get Study Tech in fully and correctly right away.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:nt:gal


===========================
468 ED 176 INT 24 Apr 72 AUDITOR RECOVERY
[p. 261-2]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 176 INT 24 April 1972

To: C/O, ED 
Tech Sec

Subject: AUDITOR RECOVERY

Reference:

LRH ED 174 Int Study and Tech Breakthrough
HCO PL 9 Apr 72 Correct Danger Condition (Issue III) 
HCO B 30 Mar 72 Primary Correction Rundown 
HCO B 20 Apr 72 C/S Series 78 Product Purpose and Why and 
WC Error Correction


SITUATION: It quite often happens that an org has an
auditor that stops producing or doesn't produce or blows or
ceases to audit.

Investigation has revealed that the auditor situation is
similar to that of students who blow for lack of study tech.

Each auditor who lets down has a WHY and has misunderstood
words or has not really checked out on his current tech.
Thus they foul up, let down or blow.

As orgs sometimes find it hard to get auditors, the
situation can be very hard on the C/O or ED and Tech Sec
unless it is handled.


STATS: Well Done Auditing Hour stats very low in some orgs
and backlogs in many.

WHY: Auditors can ease off or cease auditing for
Individual WHYs for each auditor.

Ideal Scene: All Auditors auditing more than their minimum
and happily on post.


HANDLING:

1. Compile three lists of auditors (a) who have left but
are still in area or (b) who want to leave the org or (c)
who are not getting out their hours.

HAS _____.


2. M4 and study the Data Series so as to know what a
WHY is, and the above references.

DIR OF PERS ENHANCEMENT (or Qual Sec or as designated or
done by the C/O or ED) _____.


3. Call in Auditors on lists (b) and (c) whether on Tech
posts or Admin. Assess both Trouble Area Lists in the P/L
9 April 72 Issue III. Fly each read with 2 Way Comm and
Earlier Similar and keep a worksheet of the auditor's
answers. Find the WHY of the letdown in auditing. If not
directly apparent from answers given, and is not obvious
(such as PTS or missed words or no Study Tech or has not
read materials or other very apparent reasons, then you can
list to a BD F/N Item the Question "What Reason do you have
for not auditing?" The BD F/N Item will be their Why. 
Write it below the Trouble Area Assessment in the space
provided.

DIR OF PERS E or the C/O or ED Designated Person _____.


4. See that action is done to remedy the WHY, whatever
it was. It will be the Ist Dynamic Danger Formula of that
P/L completed.

HAS _____.


5. Do the same with list (a) in 1 above.

Same person who did 3 above _____.


6. See that they apply Ist Dynamic formula.

HAS _____.


7. Try to get some of list (a) to join the org staff.

HAS _____.


8. Get all Org auditors and Supervisors through the
Primary Correction Rundown HCO B 30 Mar 72, allowing for
those steps already done previously on LRH ED 174 INT or
lists (b) and (c).

QUAL SEC _____.


9. Correct any wrong Whys found using C/S Series 78 HCO B
20 April 72 by correct C/Sing and handling.

ORG C/S _____.


Completely aside from remedying any out tech you may have,
and the personal benefit the auditors will receive, this
should solve any auditor scarcity problem.

It is a very effective Program.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:mes:bk


===========================
469 ED 178 INT 30 May 72 SUPER-LITERACY
[p. 255-60]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 178 INT 30 May 1972

To: All Staff 
All Auditors 
All Students 
All Scientologists 
BPI

Subject: SUPER-LITERACY

Reference: LRH ED 174 INT Study and Tech Breakthrough 
LRH ED 175 INT Tech Primary Rundown

SUPER - Superiority in size, quality, number or degree.

LITERACY - the ability to read and write.


Almost everyone these days is able to read and write. This
was not true a century ago but, with modern stress on
education, it is true today.

But is this enough today?

It is an instruction book world. The civilization in which
we live is highly technical.

Education today goes into the twenties.

That's a third of one's life.

And what happens when one leaves school?

Can he do what he studied?

Does he have all his education or did it get left behind?

Literacy is not enough.

Today's schools and today's world require a new ability -
the ability to look at a page without any strain and absorb
what it says and then apply it right now without any stress
at all.

And is that possible?

Am I talking about speed reading?

No. That is just being able to read rapidly. It does not
improve the comfort of reading and it does not improve the
ability to apply.

What is really needed is the ability to COMFORTABLY and
QUICKLY take data from a page and be able at once to APPLY it.

Anyone who could do that would be SUPER-LITERATE.

WHAT HAPPENS?

The average person - literate - is able to read words and
mentally record words.

[Drawings on this ED have a circle around the "mind",
shown here as boxes]

Like this:

WORDS SAME WORDS 
now in his mind
======== 
xxxx |xxxx |
xxxx |xxxx |
xxxx <---------> |xxxx |
xxxx |xxxx |
========

When he writes he writes:

WORDS WORDS 
======== 
xxxx |xxxx |
xxxx |xxxx |
xxxx <---------- |xxxx |
xxxx |xxxx |
========


In his mind words are "understood" as other words like this:

WORDS 
===========
|xxxx yyyy|
|xxxx yyyy|
|xxxx yyyy|
|xxxx yyyy|
===========

When one is Super-Literate, this is what happens:

Words Concepts
==========
|xxxx OX|
|xxxx OX|
|xxxx OX|
|xxxx OX|
==========


Therefore as he is dealing in concepts (ideas or
understandings) this can happen:

====
|OX|
ACTION <--|OX|
|OX|
|OX|
====


And he thinks in concepts to which he can fit words easily
and so can write clearly.

In other words, when one is Super-Literate, one reads not
words but understandings. And so one can act.


PRIMARY RUNDOWN

Super Literacy is the end product of a Primary Rundown or a
Primary Correction Rundown.

How these are done are covered in HCO B 4 April 72 Revised
30 May 72 Primary Rundown and HCO B 30 Mar 72 Revised 30
May 72 Primary Correction Rundown.

Basically they consist of a Method One Word Clearing. This
is the action taken to clean up all misunderstoods in every
subject one has studied. It is done by a Word Clearing
Auditor.

The result of a properly done Method One Word Clearing is
the recovery of one's education. This in itself is quite
astonishing.

This makes one a WORD CLEAR.

The next action is to do the Study Tapes word by word, each
word looked up in a good dictionary or simple grammar.

There are booklets of the words in alphabetical order for
each tape, as they appear newly on each time. These were
compiled on Flag for this purpose.

When one has done the booklet fully one listens to the
tape. He is then checked on a word clearing meter for any
misunderstood words. If any are found he gets them defined
and then hears the tape again.

In this way he goes all the way through the Study Tape Series.

As these tapes also contain all the basics of study itself
he is at once in possession of the first real data on how
to study something.

He now goes through the Student "Hat" in the same way.

In doing this he has raised his understanding of words and
through words up to about ten times that of the average
college graduate.

And he has done it.

He will find some remarkable things have come about.

He can read comfortably.

He can place What he reads into immediate action.

His IQ will soar.

He will be able to put his thoughts down on paper with ease
and clarity.

And there's more case gain in it than many other actions.

He is SUPER-LITERATE!


PRIMARY CORRECTION RUNDOWN

For those who have had a hard time in schools, the Primary
Correction Rundown adds correction of the past brutalities
and invalidations of education and finds the reason he is
"against study."

The end results are the same.

So it even works for tough cases!


HONESTY

Honest action on the Primary Rundown is required to obtain
the result.

Any skips, cheats, short cuts all deny the person the real result.

The earliest batches of students found this out the hard
way and had to be sent for a Correction Rundown!

Honesty is, after all, the basis of sanity. The road to
truth is only for the truthful.

But even these, once corrected, made it!

And became Super-Literate.


BIG WIN

So this is a big win in the world of study and ability.

The first real data on how to study lies there in the
rundown, waiting for the student to have it.

And he sure isn't disappointed once he's sweated his way
through it.

It's like getting born. Horrible while it's going on. But
oh, it's great to be alive!

And able to really Communicate with the world.


SUCCESS

Read these Success excerpts from the first 14 students:

..A full return of the ability to read and understand
without skips and non-confronts... Years and years of
fogginess -- school after school after school -- have
lifted... An incredible discovery -- again... Reached a
new plateau in the area of education... With the words out
of the way, the true meaning came through loud and clear...
A whole new world opened up for me... I'm a new born
citizen in a new born civilization, combat ready and able
minded.

..Great feeling to be able to understand what I read...
Wins are many -- communication level is different... 
Really handled words terminatedly... Rehabbed my study
ability... Have busted through the "fear" of study... 
Totally changed my whole attitude to being a student and a
staff member... No confusions!... Stellar attainment of
knowing how to study... Ability to observe, duplicate,
understand and judgement... Extra step up in awareness and
confront of people and MEST.

.,,Undercuts the whole field of gaining knowledge... Study
has become very easy and I now enjoy it.., Vocabulary has
increased to no end.., I have never learned so much... 
Really feel clean about studying now... Most rewarding
cycle completed to date.., Opened up an incredible world
of detail and meaning previously hidden -- blew tons of
mass on words and significances... The greater joy of
actually learning and being able to do can be reached.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:ne:bk

===========================
470 ED 1 PUBS 29 Jul 72 CATALOGUE PROJECT
[p. 688-9]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 1 PUBS US AND DK 28 July 1972 
1 ASHO 1 AOSHDK

URGENT

To: Pubs Executives

Subject: CATALOGUE PROJECT

SITUATION: I have been examining merchandising catalogues
to find what in catalogues makes people buy or not buy.

WHY: Catalogues which do not fully describe materials or
offer all items available do not get public purchases.

IDEAL SCENE: Catalogues which fully describe and list all
merchandise, are easy to read and elicit org and public
purchasing in high volume.

As this applies to PUBS:


HANDLING:

An inspection of the 1971 Catalogue of SPO A/S No. 1 1971
finds the following outnesses: "SPO A/S" at top of cover
gives a Mis U to start with. The gold printed Ist page
with a poem on it can't be read at all. There is a lie on
the next page saying all these items are in stock and will
be shipped in 24 hours. It does not start with the first 2
books (Original Thesis and Evolution of a Science) but with
1956 Fundamentals of Thought. THERE IS NOT ONE DESCRIPTION
OF ANY TAPE. The Wash DC Congress in Color is not mentioned.

The second catalogue, the current one, has no catalogue
number. It is slanted only to orgs and starts with the
words on pg 1 "BOOK INCOME" so can't be used to individual
buyers. Its books are listed out of sequence. It mentions
NO TAPES AT ALL. IT MENTIONS NO FILMS. If you cut the
order blank the book would go to pieces.

These are the faults. They have cost Pubs a fortune.

THE PLUSPOINT IS THAT THE CATALOGUES EXIST AT ALL.

1. At once the C/O Pubs in US and DK are to independently 
assign personnel to get the Catalogues redone. _____

2. TWO separate catalogues are to beone for, issued by
both US and DK. One for orgs, one for public. A dummy 
is to be made with each fault listed above remedied. _____

3. The public catalogue is to be very thin No. 10
envelope size, (same size as the SPO A/S No. 1 - 71) and
easy to mail. It is to have no items the public or
Franchises would not buy (like certs, pro course books,
etc.). Each item is to be the subject of a short sales
talk including tapes and films. The cover is to be red.
CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

4. The org catalogue is to be in a yellow cover, able to
go in a No. 10 envelope (same size as the original SPO A/S
No. 1 - 71). It also describes every item and tape and
film and includes all items orgs would buy, with all
descriptions of how to buy. CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

5. A separate order form on yellow paper is to be mocked
up for orgs of a size to fold several loosely into a
catalogue. These give adequate quantities and discounts. 
CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

6. An order form on pink paper is to be mocked up for
loose stuffing in the public or Franchise catalogue. This
has the time honored form "check off the items you have"
and gives a column for it and "I order these" giving column
and cash price etc. for it. (This is the successful SH
mailer form.) CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

7. The dummies are to obtain I/A as per this ED from
Flag. CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

8. Print enough for mailing and for stock.
CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

9. Mail to the appropriate mailing lists with order forms 
in them. CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

10. Send Orgs quantities of the individual (red) booklets
and order forms. CATALOGUE PROJECT. _____

11. Report Pjt complete to CS-7 Flag. C/O. _____


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:nt:iw


===========================

SEE LRH ED 179R 30 Nov 1974 (the original 179 was issued
19 August 1972).

===========================
471 ED 181 INT 7 Sep 72 EVALUATION
[p. 251-2]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 181 INT 7 September 1972

To: Execs

Subject: EVALUATION


Missions when they go into orgs, find that execs do not use
the Data Series at all.

Execs apparently just push and push to get stats up and
when they don't go up, the Exec goes into apathy.

The missing action is Evaluation.

Like one org C/O yelled and yelled to get the place clean. 
It was filthy. And it didn't get cleaned. And the exec
finally quit trying.

An evaluation was done by an outsider and the real why was
found: There were no brooms, mops or soap available. The
simple handling was to make the materials available in
central places and get them restored after use and a supply
line kept in.

Well, to do that Evaluation the Exec would have had to

1. Know the Data Series (Study it, get it Method 4ed).

2. Listen to what people tried to tell him or read the
reports. (TR 4)

3. Observe. (TR O)

4. Find the real why. (Apply what's studied.)

5. Handle what's found. (Do some work: Get actual compliance.)


Now that's a ridiculously simple example. But the solution
is the same for the most complex problems.

Here's an example: The ED tearing into Div 2 weekly to get
GI. And ripping the place apart to get GI.

Yet no reg on post to collect any!

Here's another. No GI. Why? Tech Sec telling Reg all the
pcs are PTS so the Reg sending all pcs to Ethics instead of
signing them up! And the Tech Sec's why: wouldn't permit
auditors to audit because they all needed training but
there was no D of T or any Cramming to do it!

So an ED could yell and yell but if he didn't know how to
evaluate the entire scene would elude him utterly.

The biggest barrier to Evaluation is that the Evaluator
seldom believes anything could be that stupid. Yet all
Whys are huge stupidities.

This is so much the case that an Evaluator can't ever be
reasonable. He has to evaluate by outpoints.

In short, to find a real why an Evaluator has to learn to
think like an idiot.

And to get a bright idea an Evaluator has to be a genius.
There is no successful middle ground.

I know one ED who is a great guy and a fireball. But he
doesn't evaluate. Right now he is C/Sing and auditing
while holding the post of ED and is working himself ragged
trying to keep his stats up. But he has not noticed an
omitted terminal. If he is C/Sing and auditing and is ED,
then there is no ED! And that's his Why. His handling
would be, if he's the only C/S and top auditor, to get a
Deputy ED to run the org. It's not that he is not
working. It's that he isn't evaluating.

Another org's Div 7 does only Div 6 actions. So again,
nobody is running the org.

In another day all this would have been okay. But today we
have the sharp tools of the Data Series.

The virtue of the Data Series is that in its use one
enormously increases one's effectivenss and enormously
reduces the worry and stress.

The Data Series is the key tech of organization. When it's
used the stress comes off and the stats go up.

The day you find your first real dead on Why that really
opens the door, you become a Data Series convert.

Wow, what a wonderful feeling!


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:sb:bk


===========================
472 ED 182 INT 11 Nov 72 A SUCCESS STORY
[p. 247-50]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 182 INT 11 November 1972

To: All Scientologists 
BPI MAGAZINES.

Subject: A SUCCESS STORY

Ref: PRIMARY RD


The following success story is of great interest to those
who are hammering away at the Primary Rundown and those who
wonder what it is, those who flinch and those who are
trying to skid through it on pretense, and those who are
honestly trying.

"Dear Ron,

For what seems like many a year and is but a few months,
I've been wondering what I was going to say to you when
time came to sit down and write. I knew the time would
come. I didn't know when, but I knew that when it did, it
would be a very special occasion for me.

I've been in Scientology a little over a year now, and as
the wins began to mount up, many questions passed across my
mind. How to thank a man whose discoveries have given me
back the love of my family, who made it possible for me to
leave behind a fistful of grinding somatics, who threw wide
the doors of communication, love, knowledge.

As problems dissolved, as lumps and pains evaporated, I
wondered, "Is it time for 'the letter'?" Each time, 'til
now, the answer was, "Not yet."

About a week or ten days ago, I felt the time coming.
Thoughts began to crystalize. Ideas took form. Let me
explain what happened, along with some background.

In early June, I started the Student Hat portion of the
Primary Rundown. I had completed Method One, Life Repair,
Straightwire and the Drug Rundown. I imagined that the
course would be time consuming, but inasmuch as I was a
writer, (a professional wordsmith, I imagined), I
anticipated no difficulty at all.

Wrong.

The seemingly endless lists of words became one big glop of
mass. Somewhere along the way I'd heard about the "Wall of
Tapes" on the Briefing Course. Well, I coined a term, "The
Wall of Words."

To really convey what a shock this was to me, there's a bit
more background needed.

I was graduated from College Phi Beta Kappa, with Highest
Honors in Economics, and in the top 1% in my class. I was
awarded fellowships to attend Harvard, Stanford, Columbia
and the University of Virginia. I chose Virginia, and my
first semester I was one of a handful of people in the
Graduate School to make straight A's.

To put it mildly, I was a 'bright' student. Of course I
never understood why I had those long, terrible periods of
'rotting' when I could barely drag my body to class. And I
never understood why, when I sat down to write something, I
would feel as if someone had slipped a syringe in my ear to
fill my head with molasses. I tried all kinds of unusual
solutions to this latter -- changes in diet, working
nights, working early mornings, exercise, plenty of sleep
(12 hours a night), and on and on.

Finally, I got fed up with graduate school after 2 1/2 years
of working on a PH. D in Economics. I left for New York
City with my sights set on becoming a writer. Within 6
months I had published my first article in Barron's, a
sister publication to the Wall Street Journal. In this
article, I published the 'inside story' on what was going
to happen in Chicago at the Democratic Convention. When
the riots and chaos I predicted in fact occurred, the
article suddenly received nationwide publicity, was
reprinted in the Congressional Record, and was quoted in a
Senate document and reprinted in a book.

Cocky was I? You can believe it.

But there was still this other side to it. The week in
which I wrote that article was literally one of the most
agonizing weeks of my life. I worked over 100 hours,
rewrote the article ten times, and pulled in every somatic
and undesirable condition ever experienced by man. Writing
was not fun.

So along came the Student Hat. My Method One had been
great and had located gobs of misunderstoods and blew them.
But it only does what it does, and never came close to
clearing up the thousands of 'not-understoods' or
'partly-understoods'. I should add, parenthetically, that
from the time I left the 8th grade until I started the Comm
Course, I used the dictionary less than a dozen times.

So, with this as my intellectual history, I collided with
an unresounding 'thunk' into the "Wall of Words". I spent
nine hours on the word 'of', a week on 'time'. And
synonyms -- my God, they drove me crazy. I'd look up a
word, and the dictionary would give me a definition and
then some synonyms. I knew that there are very few words
in the English language with identical meanings, so I set
about differentiating synonyms. To do this, I required
large sheets of paper: 'flow charts'. 

I'd write five or six which I used to make synonyms at the
top of the page; then under each, the words in that
definition I didn't understand; and then under those, more
words. Some word chains went 200 or more words. When I'd
finally get all the words written down, the mass from each
would be sitting on me. The only way I could get through
one of these lists was for my supervisor to put me on the
cans, and do Method 5 word clearing on me.

The first tape list took two months of night and some
weekend study. Then slowly, things began to pick up. The
second list took less than a month. Some nights my points
would rise to 180, but it seemed that shortly thereafter,
I'd run into a nest of not-understoods and my points would
plummet to 9 or so.

The third tape took less than three weeks; the fourth a
week; then three days, two days. When I hit the seventh
tape list, I came flying out the top and essentially was
superliterate. I did the seventh tape in a day, and the
8th in a day. My points were four and five hundred per hour.

The rest of the course took six days, six long ones to be
sure, but just six. Last night I finished the Primary
Rundown and received an incredible round of applause from
my classmates at Celebrity Centre who, like me, knew what
it took to confront the Wall of Words. As I stood there
with the warm waves of applause rolling over me, I knew the
time had come to write.

I feel that in the area of writing and study, my doingness
is restored. It is now quite easy for me to do what I want
to do -- which is write. No longer do I feel the need to
gulp a quart of coffee to get a running start on my work
before blahs envelop me in their sticky goo. At the first
sign of a blah now, I get that hunted look and head for the
dictionary.

I find it such an incredible win to be able to do this.
I've always known my ability was there. And a lot of
doingness has been too, but it's always been so
uncomfortable just to do. I knew things did not have to
be that way -- and that kept me going -- but at times, I
was very discouraged.

As a young child, I had an insatiable lust and love for
learning. Probably the first word I learned was 'why'. 
Yet by the third grade, the love was gone. In its place a
compulsion to know. With completion of the Primary
Rundown, that love is back. I feel a big part of me has
been restored.

As for the future? Given the incredible velocity of change
in Scientology, I really don't know what I'll be doing more
than two or three years from now, at least in terms of
specifics. I'm now Freedom Associate Editor at the U.S.G.O.
and will be building that into a weekly paper. I'll do my
tech training to Class IV and then OEC and FEBC. Meantime,
I'm finishing two books on Scientology celebrities (you'll
hear about them when they're done), and there's a
screenplay and novel I've outlined. And, of course, Clear
and O.T.

In a couple of years, I want to take six months, come to
Flag as a paying customer, train up to Class 24 or
whatever's tops by then, and get my case terminatedly handled.

Looking longer run, I know I'm in Scientology for the
duration. But as well, I have strong purpose lines in the
arts, in education, and in fact have outlined plans for a
school to be called the Renaissance School which would have
study tech as its foundation and Renaissance Men, men who
are masters of the arts, ideas and action, as its product.

Rather than just a "Thank you", I'd like to close this
letter with a little poem I wrote some months ago. I think
it says what I want to say.


THE PHILOSOPHER

It has been said, by poet and sage alike, that within each
man burns the fire of ten thousand different suns.

"Then tell me why?", pleaded the poet, "Why has man grown dim?"

"Yes, tell me why?", sang the minstrel, "Is there so much
less of him."

"I know why," uttered the sage. "There is a blotch on the
souls of men."

"Don't tell me why," said the philosopher. "I'll find
out."...and he did.

With love and appreciation,

Bill Good"


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:nt:gal


===========================

YEAR OF 1973

===========================
473 ED 205 INT 28 Sep 73 TRANSFER OF GUARDIAN FUNCTIONS
[p. 244-6]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 205 INT 28 September 1973

To: All LRH Comms

Info: Guardian Office 
GO WW 
D/Gs 
A/Gs

From: RON

Subject: TRANSFER OF GUARDIAN FUNCTIONS IN TECH AND POLICY
TO LRH COMMS

Reference: HCO PL 27 May 1970R, Revised 25 September 1973


The Tech Bureau and Policy Knowledge Bureau of the GO have
just been phased out. At GO WW and GO US the Tech
personnel are being transferred to a GO Housekeeping Unit
but in all other Guardian Offices, these Tech Personnel are
to be transferred to the Office of the LRH Comm.

It is of the utmost urgency not to lose these Tech
personnel or let them be pirated into the org, and it is
vitally important that their hats and functions also be
transferred.

The LRH Comm UK Continental and the LRH Comm US Continental
must obtain new personnel in the field of Tech and add them
to their offices, and must salvage the hats and functions
even though they do not get the actual personnel which were
in the UK and US main Guardian Offices.

Any personnel posted in the Policy Knowledge Bureau in any
Guardian Office are transferred to the LRH Comm Office.

It is a vital thing for LRH Comms to get in on-HCOB Tech. 
This is best done by having a Deputy LRH Comm for Tech for
that office or org.

LRH Comms are now responsible for the correct use and the
actual use and application of Policy in orgs. Therefore
any GO personnel or materiel or hats on this subject should
be transferred to the Office of the LRH Comm.

The duties of the Tech Bureau mainly concerned checking
refunds, following up out-Tech on persons, and assuring
that celebrities received correct and standard Tech. These
functions are contained in the GO hats for the Tech Bureau.
All these functions and hats now apply to LRH Comms.

The main purpose of this transfer came from an evaluation
in which it was found that Policy responsibility was
transferred to the Guardian Office and that this is
primarily an internal org function. Externalizing the
attention of the Guardian Office takes some of the weight
off of its lines, and this slack must be taken up by the
LRH Comm Network.

LRH Comms are therefore responsible for the Tech quality
and the exact application of HCOBs. They are also
responsible for Policy Knowledge and use.

To the degree that Tech is exactly and precisely applied,
per HCOBs, books and tapes, orgs expand and prosper.

To the degree that Policy Letters are in active use in the
org, the org expands and prospers.

These two facts have been proven repeatedly in many orgs

Another factor which has prevented Policy from going in
fully in some areas has been the existence of Flag Mission
Orders in the hands of posted executives, which did not
necessarily keep the org on policy. These are being
cancelled and supplanted by policy programs to be executed
by LRH Comms.


PROGRAM

1. Obtain the Tech hats, files and Policy Knowledge
Bureau hats, files and library from the Guardian Office in
your area at once. EVERY LRH COMM _____

2. Excepting only Continental UK and Continental US
Offices, transfer at once any Tech or Policy Knowledge
Guardian personnel to the LRH Comm Office with the title
D/LRR Comm Tech and D/LRH Comm Policy, followed by the area
name. LRH COMM _____

3. In UK and US Continental areas, appoint new Technical
personnel to the Continental Office, with the title Deputy
LRH Comm Tech.

LRH COMM UK, LRH COMM US _____

4. In the UK and US Continental Offices, have the
former Tech Bureau personnel hat the new Deputy LRH Comm
for Tech. LRH COMM UK, LRH COMM US _____

5. By hatting, posting, making sure they have a desk,
and generally putting the Deputy LRH Comm Tech and Deputy
LRH Comm Policy Knowledge on post, assure that they are now
carrying out the same duties as were carried out by the GO
so that nothing of this is lost. LRH COMM _____

6. Survey your org or area and with or without the
assistance of the Deputy LRH Comm for Tech, see what HCOBs
must be put in first and write a program to do so, which
will best inhibit refunds in your area, and which will be
executed by the Deputy LRH Comm Tech where one now exists,
or by the LRH Comm. LRH COMM _____

7. With the assistance of any Policy Knowledge
personnel, now Deputy LRH Comm for Policy, or without it,
survey the org and see what Policy Letters should be gotten
in first to make the org prosper, and get into production. 
LRH COMM _____

8. When received, post the new org board HCO PL for the
LRH Comm Office. LRH COMM _____

9. Compose and conduct a PR campaign so that staff
members are aware of the new functions of the LRH Comm
Office, in order to get their cooperation.
LRH COMM _____

10. Compose and conduct a campaign to make staff members
aware that by following Policy and precise HCOB Tech, the
org will be saved enormous sums in refunds, thus justifying
this program. LRH COMM _____


L. RON HUBBARD 
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY

BDCS:LRH:rhc:nt:bk


===========================
474 ED 214 INT 14 Dec 73 RON'S JOURNAL 4 FUEL AND THE WORLD
[p. 242-3]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 214 INT 14 December 1973


RON'S JOURNAL 4

FUEL AND THE WORLD


You are hearing doubtless that calamity and catastrophe are
setting in over the world at a rapid rate.

You know of course that fuel has been made very scarce
while there is more fuel actually available in the wells
and mines than ever before. And you probably also know
that Englishmen face a 3 day week with a L400 fine and/or
three months in jail for turning on one electric light.

Inflation is grinning gleefully out of the bank windows and
stealing the savings of the old.

Russia is pushing rockets at the US base in Cuba, massing
armies on the border of Vietnam and pointing (from Egypt)
nuclear rockets at Tel Aviv. And that it is plain she
engineered the fuel shortage and, by forcing constant
preparedness for decades, inflation.

Russia for all that will lose because the US and Canada
were feeding the Russians on wheat, because these actions
will bring on a hard faced fascist attitude in the West and
open her back to an eager hostile China.

An apparently panicked leaderless West is taking it out
thus far only on their own people and handling nothing
sensibly.

Well, it's a pretty gloomy scene. London and US stock
markets plunging, production chopped, trade deficits
soaring. People without transport or heat or lights and
soaring unemployment.

In most areas people would play hell getting a job now.

It's the sort of a thing that happens when people insist on
wrong whys and mishandlings. The sort of thing that comes
from financing killer psychiatrists and teaching German
psychology to the school kids.

BUT it's not all gloom!

While the world goes down OUR statistics are going UP! All
International stats are hitting so high that even when they
momentarily slump they come down to yesteryear's highest
evers! They are POWER stats! And in a month (December)
when we usually have crashes!

We are going UP while the world is coming down!

It is the subject of sociology statistics that we are the
fastest growing religion in the world. And that when all
orthodox faiths are in steep decline.

Of course there's a certain amount of plain hell managing
things in the hail of falling currencies, commodities and
institutions. But all that takes a hard line
professionalism that keeps on going brilliantly despite the
failures around us.

We are in actual fact booming during a worldwide crash!

Well, sociologists have been predicting for years that when
things went to pieces culturally a new religion would pick
up the pieces. That's us.

What we're doing about it all and what you can do about it
is

1. Take full advantage of the enforced idleness of
others in the society to pack them in and get them
processed and trained.

2. Be more professional and skilled in management and
tech than we ever dreamed of being before.

3. Keep right on plowing through the rubble of modern
culture to new attainments for Scientology.

Now listen: This is OUR planet. Nobody else owns it nor
wants much to do with it.

The Coca Cola civilization has busted its bottle. So what?
So what's that to us?

We rolled forward with the existing culture dead set on
stopping anyone who tried. Well, we can certainly roll
forward while the Powers-that-were run around in futile panics.

This is OUR planet. Maybe this cultural collapse is just
saving it from total pollution.

Keep this in mind: We CAN and ARE rolling forward and UP
while the world comes down.

We not only can do it, we are doing it.

No great new movement ever progressed in times of plenty.
They are bred and strengthened in disaster.

We are not pleased at all the Powers-that-were made such a
mess. But we can take full advantage of it.

And we are doing so.

This is OUR planet.

We have the tech, we have the know-how of admin. We can
use it fully and effectively.

We might as well move in!


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:gal


===========================
475 ED 1 UK 14 Dec 73 "...UTILIZE THE PUBLIC'S FREE..."
[p. 670]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 1 UK 14 December 1973

141205R LRH COMM UK RLY
EDS STAFF AND ISSUE AS
LRH ED 1 UK


UTILIZE THE PUBLIC'S FREE TIME BY GETTING
THEM IN. YOU TURN THIS GOVT ACTION INTO
A BOOM FOR US.

LOVE = RON


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:nt:gal


===========================
476 ED 215 INT 15 Dec 73 LARGEST PAINTING
[p. 241]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 215 INT 15 December 1973


LARGEST PAINTING


I have just been informed that the famous painter KNOX
MARTIN is currently at work on the largest painting in the
world.

It is on a building near Chambers and Church Street in New
York City.

On Dec 9 there was a half hour TV show on him on Channel 4
New York.

Knox is Clear and OT I.

The title of the painting is "THETA WOMAN".

Evidence is beginning to come in that it IS OUR Planet. We
are not only cleaning up its people but we are painting it
beautifully as well!

Love,

RON


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:clb:gal


===========================
