FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

LRH EDs - THE BLUE VOLUMES - 13/28 repost

============================

This is the Second Foundation. Our purpose is to keep
LRH's plan on track (ref: Asimov).

CofS has gone off the rails. This is an announcement of 
our support of FZBA, Freezone, and The Pilot.

We are posting the LRH EDs to make ammends for our long
delay in taking action.

ARC,

PROGRAM DIRECTOR
SECOND FOUNDATION


============================

LRH EDs - THE BLUE VOLUMES

This is a complete copy of the "Original LRH EDs" or Blue 
Volumes as issued by Bridge in 1983. The full contents
for all 28 parts posted is in part 1.

The volumes were divided into the 3 numbering Series, and 
subdivided into the classes of EDs (INT = International, 
WW = World Wide, SH = Saint Hill, etc.) and placed in reverse 
order (latest first) within type. This was quite confusing
because of some EDs being in multiple classes with different
numbers in each class.

We rearranged everything in date order (earliest first) to
give a better historical perspective and make these easy
to find by date. The original table of contents is included 
in part 2 and the original page numbers are in "[]" at the 
beginning of each ED.

See IMB 5 in part 2 for an explanation of the 3 Series of ED
numbers and a list of valid (but expired) EDs not included.
See LRH ED 345 INT in part 28 for a list of cancelled LRH EDs
that were not included.

These are only the EDs that are in the Blue Volumes.

**************************************************

FZBA STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


Part 13

360 ED 72 INT 9 Jan 70 LRH COMM STAFF PROGRAMME NO. 1
361 ED 73 INT 9 Jan 70 ETHICS PROGRAMME NO. 1 PROJECT
362 ED 74 INT 14 Jan 70 SOLVENCY
363 ED 75 INT 17 Jan 70 THE USES OF AUDITING
364 ED 81 INT 20 Jan 70 A VITAL TARGET
365 ED 81 INT 20 Jan 70 ADDENDUM 6 Aug 82 SPD 19
366 ED 21 WW 20 Jan 70 The UK Anzo Boom Cycle
367 ED 20 WW 21 Jan 70 SH Auditing Hours
368 ED 76 INT 26 Jan 70 1969 DOWNSTAT CORRECTIONS
369 ED 77 INT 27 Jan 70 THURSDAY REPORTS
370 ED 78 INT 28 Jan 70 SUMMARY OF INT NO. 1 PROGRAMS
371 ED 79 INT 30 Jan 70 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROGRAMME NO. 1 ADDITION
372 ED 79 INT 4 Feb 70 MAJOR AUDITING ACTIONS
373 ED 80 INT 5 Feb 70 ORGANIZATION AND INCOME
374 ED 84 INT 8 Feb 70 1969 LRH EDs
375 ED 85 INT 12 Feb 70 CURRENT ACTIONS
376 ED 22 WW 12 Feb 70 ETHICS IN ORGS WW ACTIONS
377 ED 83 INT 17 Feb 70 STAT RECOVERY, AN ANALYSIS OF BROAD OUTNESSES
378 ED 82 INT 18 Feb 70 ORG EXEC COURSE PASS
379 ED 87 INT 21 Feb 70 CHECKOUT ON F/N AND END PHENOMENA
380 ED 88 INT 26 Feb 70 STANDARD TECH AND INVALIDATION
381 ED 89 INT 1 Mar 70 RECRUIT!


===========================

YEAR OF 1970

===========================
360 ED 72 INT 9 Jan 70 LRH COMM STAFF PROGRAMME NO. 1
[p. 513]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 72 INT 9 January 1970

All Orgs, All SHs, AOs


LRH COMM STAFF PROGRAMME NO. 1


People who are on Staff Programme No. 1 and doing well 
on it should be given their choice in full time training 
up as Auditors.

What we're trying to do now is make lots of Auditors and 
keep them busy.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:rs:bk


===========================
361 ED 73 INT 9 Jan 70 ETHICS PROGRAMME NO. 1 PROJECT
[p. 512]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 73 INT 9 January 1970

Applies to All Orgs, To all Bases, AOs & SHs


ETHICS PROGRAMME NO. 1 PROJECT


As soon as Ethics Programme No. 1 is complete in an Org or
Unit, the LRH Comm is to see that the following action is
started and completed.

Those cases not on the Upstat E/O who are simply slow study
or no study are to be given any needful Review, or to have
completed any Review in progress, and are to be given a
Dianetic Student Rescue Intensive.

Those cases that are rough are to be finished on Dianetic
Triples to the extent of at least 25 Dianetic items run
triple and flawlessly to case gain.

All cases in general should get Dianetic Triples finished
because there's another set of processes coming up which
depend on Dianetic Triples.

Scientology Triples can be done before or after Dianetic
Triples - it doesn't matter when, the two are disrelated.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:rs:bk


===========================
362 ED 74 INT 14 Jan 70 SOLVENCY
[p. 510-11]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 74 INT 14 January 1970

To All Exec Sees D/Gs Finance Treasury Sees


SOLVENCY


A project of FP Prog #1 LRH ED 55 INT.

The greatest help you can be to the enemy is to permit orgs
to become insolvent. There is no single greater threat to
any org than insolvency.

SOLVENCY consists only of income greater than outgo and
making enough money.

There is no trick to making money. It almost has to be
planned not to have any.

It is much harder to walk back to solvency than to remain
solvent in the first place.

All an org is is a service activity that trains and
processes and keeps up the admin lines necessary to do so.

When you don't have enough auditors and supervisors there
is no way to deliver service.

One never backlogs. One keeps the auditors and supervisors
busy busy busy. Auditing has a thousand uses. So does
training.

Any org has a tendency to spend all it makes and an equally
silly one to make only what it needs.

Orgs should have heavy reserves.

In LRH ED 55 INT, you have the key to solvency. This ED
should be followed carefully. The exact amount the org
needs to get along on MUST BE KNOWN.

If the org is already in debt AN ADDITIONAL SUM IS NEEDED
WEEKLY TO RETIRE ITS DEBTS.

This FP Prog #1 must be done by the EC.

An additional sum to retire debts or build a reserve must 
be added.

A sensible and strenuous effort must then be made to make
that amount of money or more.

An industrious attitude with a no-nonsense approach will
provide solvency, good reserves, good staff facilities and pay.

Often when an org gets into financial problems it tends to
go frantic and dream up wild unusual solutions. The org
got in trouble because it didn't do the usual actions! To
go even more unusual is a fatal error.

A businesslike approach of getting in people to train and
process and delivering instantly valuable services is all
that will make money.

The #1 Program EDs tell one exactly how to do this.

When we had only a hundredth of the tech we now have we had
solvent, rich orgs. So it looks like we better get busier.

Get FP #1 done so you know where you stand.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:gal


===========================
363 ED 75 INT 17 Jan 70 THE USES OF AUDITING
[p. 508-9]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 75 INT 17 January 1970

To all Exec Sees
LRH Comm for action

Reference: LRH ED 54 INT SUPERIOR SERVICE IMAGE PROG. 
NO. 1, of which this is a project.


THE USES OF AUDITING

HANDLING WITH AUDITING

REGISTRAR ADVICE FORM


HCO Bs have been written to assist creating a Superior
Service Image.

They are:
(a) HCO B 15 Jan 70 The Uses of Auditing. 
(b) HCO B 15 Jan 70 Issue II, Handling with Auditing. 
(c) HCO B of 19 Jan 70 Registrar Advice Form.

The LRH Comm of the org (or HCO ES where there is no LRH
Comm) should have these 3 HCO Bs checked out on:

The Exec Sees 
The Registrar 
The Letter Registrar 
The Tech Sec 
The Qual Sec 
All C/Ses 
All the org's Auditors


These 3 HCO Bs should also be included in the hats of the 
above.

These HCO Bs are being made part of the Dianetics Case Super
Internship checklist.

A reason for a deteriorated org image (and GI) is a failure
to really use auditing to its fullest extent. Selling
people a couple of packages like Dn Triples and Scn Triples
and calling it a day is both foolish and destructive to an
org. Auditing has tremendous numbers of uses and
applications. One applies it personally to the pc.

Another reason for a deteriorated image is a failure to
actually handle a pc's troubles.

The HCO B 19 Jan 70 is the Registrar's Advice Form which
shows what the pc wanted and which is put at once in the
pc's folder so the C/S can have the data.

Of course, in addition to the above, it goes without saying
that the most destructive thing that can be in an org is a
Tech or Qual backlog. A one-day wait for a Tech pc is too long
and a 3 hour wait too long for a Qual pc. You need plenty
of auditors and must keep them working full time and must
never have a backlog in Tech or in Qual, day or foundation.
If you ever permit a backlog to exist, there's your GI
trouble right there.

The org image depends in its largest measure on its broad
handling of what pcs want handled.

Anything ever released (except Power, R6EW and AO materials) 
is usable in any org today.

The local LRH Comm or HCO ES IS TO INFORM ME VIA THE LRH
Comm WW when you have completed this ED.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:bk


===========================
364 ED 81 INT 20 Jan 70 A VITAL TARGET
[p. 490-2]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

FO 20 January 1969
LRH ED 81 INT


A VITAL TARGET


Trained Auditor Programme

It is vital that we step up auditor training in all orgs.

The VITAL target is

TO HAVE TRAINED AUDITORS IN PLENTY IN ORGS AND FIELD.

My data is that we must have specialized in preclears for
quite a while, that staff training as auditors went out and
that we began to develop backlogs of pcs.

Backlogs of pcs must be avoided.

Trained auditors by far make the better executives. Thus
staff auditors get promoted to execs and the staff auditor
vacancies aren't filled.

We used to allow for this. Many Academy graduates came on
staff as staff auditors routinely. HGC auditors then got
promoted to executives.

Staff training programmes permitted staffs to get to be
trained auditors on a part time schedule.

In London we used to hire typists and clerks from
employment agencies. A large percentage of them, with no
urging at all, saved up and took advantage of their 50%
staff discount and got their HPA, then came back on as
staff auditors and went on to other staff posts. Either
training got too long or too involved or the route got
barriered.

In any event each org should take responsibility for
getting the route unplugged. People who came on staff came
from the public as just-a-job or from the Scientology
field, got trained, became staff auditors, etc.

I know in orgs where I have worked I usually had to unblock
hiring. For some reason I had to do it. All sorts of
barriers got put up to people who wanted on staff. I used
to hear of people and by pass and get them to be put on.

Also, I used to order a sign in PE to get PE attendees to
join staff and a sign in the Academy to get graduates to
join staff. This was SOP.

When an org is signing up more pcs than students it will go
broke or be poor.

The 50% scholarship offer (50% of fees) mailed out used to
work well. It could be mailed to FSMs to hand out to
prospective students. If the scholarship only applied from
Dianetics to HPA and not to segments, it would boom training.

Some orgs just plain try to be clinics. The public loves
to take no responsibility and be given it all as pcs. When
they get to Solo and above they wish to hell they had
become real auditors.

You can jam the training line by making an Academy Course
long and as heavy as an SHSBC.

The REAL design of training (if anybody would really do it
this way) is:

Dianetics: Fast Course on Technique. Slide by on
philosophic data.

Academy: Fast Courses on Technique. Learn all the motions.

SHSBC: A course taking in ALL the data, philosophic, with
polishing of Technique.

Class VIII: Sharp rapid STANDARDIZATION of auditing and
case supervising with 100% gains.

When you try to standardize Class VIII style the Dianetic
course, or SHSBC, the Academy courses, you slow people down
to nowhere.

Now that we have Ethics in and VIIIs in every org WE CAN
RESTORE ATTESTATION. When we knocked it off we also
knocked down our stats. Ron's Journal 1968 will RESTORE
ATTESTATION OF GRADES AND CLASSES. This will speed up
training again and raise stats. It works only if you keep
Ethics in.

This is my immediate contribution to MORE AUDITORS.

After all, early auditors weren't all that well trained.
And training parallels the progress time track of the subject!

BUT as we EXPAND we will CONTINUALLY FACE THE PROBLEM OF
AUDITOR SHORTAGE.

Therefore YOU make a contribution on your end of it by
making the lines open. Post staff procurement signs. Get
staff trained up. Get the public to get trained.

Executives who aren't trained auditors have the highest
mortality rate as executives. How can anyone really guide
a Scientology org who doesn't know the subject.

So let's keep this Target up there as a big Target:

TO HAVE TRAINED AUDITORS IN PLENTY IN ORGS AND FIELD.

Train staffs is part of the Target.

Sign up more students than pcs is part of it.

Push Training in Promotion is part of it.

We used to tell people that training as an auditor made one
more able to handle life and his fellows. It didn't mean
one became a professional auditor and hung out a shingle. 
We better hit this campaign again.

Anyway, it's a key Target, a big one. It is a Vital
Target, what we have to do to make things go at all.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder


===========================
365 ED 81 INT 20 Jan 70 ADDENDUM 6 Aug 82 SPD 19
[p. 493-5]

6 August 1982

ADDENDUM

LRH ED 81 INT


Reference: Scientology Policy
Directive 19 THE INTEGRITY OF SOURCE


LRH ED 81 INT A VITAL TARGET was written by LRH. At his
request, CS-2 added a program in LRH ED 81R INT, which LRH
approved. The revised issue also contained some revisions
to the text.

LRH ED 81R INT has been cancelled, as much of it was not
written by LRH. Since he requested and approved the
program, however, it has been revised for reissue as an
Addendum to the original LRH ED 81 INT. In this way, what
LRH wrote is clearly distinguishable.

(Revisions to original program in script. Ellipses
indicate deletions.)

[For posting as text to the net, the script revisions
have been placed inside <> marks.


PROGRAM

1. Make this LRH ED known to the Execs and staff by
reading it to them and posting a copy on the Staff Bulletin
Board. LRH COMM _____

2. Get Sales and Promo personnel in addition to Tech
starrated in Qual on HCO PL <25 Sap 79 Iss I Urgent -
Improtant Successful Training Line Up.>
LRH COMM _____

3. Start selling Training FAST in preference to
processing. (no NOT let up on selling auditing too.) Use
the argument - a student gets tons of auditing cheaper -
study is high gain - training as an Auditor makes one more
able to be at cause over the crashing world and handle his
fellows. REGISTARS _____

4. PROMOTE CHEAPEST ROAD TO CLEAR is through Training.
REGISTRARS, DIR PROMO <AND MKTG> _____

5. Use Fast Flow Training reinstated and co-auditing as
selling points.
REGISTRARS, DIR PROMO <AND MKTG> _____

6. Give Reges a quota of at least one for one training/
processing and demand the quota is met and maintained.
GO/ED, DISSEM SEC _____

7. Make it clearly known to CF public that the Primary
RD is suspended as a pre-requisite for all Academy Courses.
The only pre-requisites are the <Student Hat Course>, and
additionally, Method One Word Clearing is a <prerequisite 
for OEC and a certification requirement on Level 0> students 
and above only.
REGISTRARS, DIR PROMO AND MKTG _____

8. Issue promo offering <Student Hat Course> free with
full price purchase of Academy Levels 0-4, OEC or SHSBC. 
DIR PROMO <AND MKTG> _____

9. <Offer the Method One Co-Audit course (HCO PL 25 Sep
79 Iss III Hubbard Method One Co-Audit Checksheet) to
students for OEC and Academy Level 0).
REGSSTRARS _____

10. Enclose hard sell training fliers and enrollment
forms in letters out.
DIR PROMO <AND MKTG>, LETTER REGISTRARS _____

11. Cram the Registrars hard if Training Money is down
or isn't recovering and pull in and cram anyone found to be
urging the Reges to mainly sell processing and include in
the cramming cycle a clay demo on "What happens to an org
who hasn't a full Academy and specializes mostly in
processing." QUAL SEC _____

12. Call in and get back on course blown students.
D OF T, <ARC BREAK REG> _____

13. Get or keep Reges attending training courses
regularly and F/Ning as students. A Reg who is winning at
training is more apt to sell training than a Reg who's
blown from course or having a rough time of it. 
TECH SEC, <SSO> _____

14. Find out about the training courses your org can or
should deliver applying 7 points of an Ad (HCO PL 10 Feb 65
"Ad and Bool·r Policies") so you can offer training with
certainty and real R and close sales one for one. 
REGISTRARS, DIR PROMO <AND MKTG> _____

15. Force into full effect "What is a Course" PL 16 March
71 and supervisor assistance for Fast Flow students. 
(Flag Pgm Order 86RD "What is a Course")
LRH COMM _____

16. Prominently display a sign in <Basic Courses to get>
attendees to join staff and sign in the Academy to get
Graduates to join staff directing them to see the
<Recruiter>. (HCO PL 24 June 70R ISS 77) 
HAS _____

17. Raise staff pay by training students as the primary
production. If an org only audits and has no or few
students it has to pay all bills and promotion from
processing money. Realize an auditor can only handle one
person at a time whereas a supervisor handles a class full
of students and is therefore capable of delivering to more
than one person at a time. ED/CO _____

18. Permit and encourage staffs to get trained as
Auditors on a part-time schedule outside production hours. 
GO/ED, HAS _____

19. ... _____

20. Offer a free 12 1/2 hour intensive to the Registrar who
each month sells more training than processing and make
Tech Deliver. GO/ED _____

21. Signify Pgm progress and completion to <LC OPS FLAG>.
LRH COMM _____


Original Program by CS-2

Revised and Reissued as Addendum by
Flag Mission LRHEDs

Authorized by AVC
Approved by WDC
for the
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
CSI:WDC:AVC:FMLRHEDS:CS-2:iw


===========================
366 ED 21 WW 20 Jan 70 The UK Anzo Boom Cycle
[p. 633-6]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 21 WW - 5 SH 20 January 1970

To All staffs WW, SH


The UK Anzo Boom Cycle


The Income and flows of the UK Anzo area is not now
properly organized and needs reorganization.

When WW, 1967, was ordered to be self-supporting it had
Pubs and other income.

Today WW is trying to stagger along on 10%s only. Yet it
must defend and promote all areas.

Originally WW (pre SHSBC) was actually unable to get along
on these 10%s. The 10%s were so minor compared to SHSBC
income they were not used.

The basic idea of attaching a management org to a service
org (as a Continental to a Central Org) is partially to
prevent the management org from getting unreal as it has a
service org right there. It is worth a great deal of money
to a service org to have a management org attached to it as
the public then gives that service org higher importance
and it has more business. If this is understood and used
by a service org it makes more than the additional cost of
supporting the management org.

SH is the org at Worldwide and as such should make
additional money, more than enough more to support WW ban
or no ban.

Since the removal of ASHO to LA and establishing the little
org in DK, SH has not really tried to recover and has not
only not used WW's importance but has not really included
itself in as the top UK-Anzo org. There are 70 million
English speaking people in England and several more in Ante
and Scn orgs have a total monopoly on helping psychesomatic
illness. Nearly all the English are psychosomatically ill.

WW's support really ought to be SH. There are two reasons
for this: A. WW would have a much higher reality on
service orgs and B. by using the importance of WW, SH
would greatly increase its income.

SH needs to work the UK and Ante orgs to make them feed
traffic to SH.

A working org combine exists (as shown in LRH ED UK of 12
Jan 1970 issued by the CO of 'Diana') with SH as the top
service org.

WW, by its prominence assists the attractiveness of SH.

Both WW and SH have been very financially irresponsible
during 1969 to run up such heavy debts. While WW did pay
off a lot of Pubs bills it let get run up in 1968, the SO
has kept Pubs going, however. One writ served on WW was
one too many.

My own plan of operation for the area has never been
activated. It is a simple one ordered in about May 1968 to
boom the UK. I could see the attack's consequences.

This plan, which I will here more fully describe, consists
of WW seeing that SH took the lead as an org in the UK and
that SH worked with other UK orgs, giving them support,
personnel and FSM commissions and promotion to MAINTAIN SH
INCOME DESPITE ANY BAN. SH would then also support WW.

For SH to include itself out from UK actions and ECUK to be
in London and for "UK orgs" to be HASI, HAPI and a couple
tiny ones, is all very self-defeative.

For SH to be over staffed in Admin and other orgs to be
understaffed is foolish.

The UK set up as a unit is given in LRH ED 12 Jan 70 issued
by C/O Diana.

I do not understand what may continue to keep this UK set
up from forming and functioning.

Each UK org and WW cannot continue as isolated
non-cooperative units and SH cannot continue as an aloof
organization.

WW should see that SH as the top UK org (even though it
includes Anzo in its sphere) works with the lesser UK, Anzo
orgs. These feed people in at the bottom and they work on
up to SH.

If this cycle does not exist, there is no income. If the
cycle is understood and made to happen, SH will do great.
And can support WW easily.

The ECs of all the orgs involved, especially EC WW, SH and
HASI, should list up all the reasons why this cycle cannot
exist and should list all the actions needful to make it
exist. For if it isn't forced into being, some of these
orgs may fail.

I know for the moment stats are up. This is due mainly to
my intervention three or four months ago and the Dianetic
Program starting to come home.

But SH should have a L10,000 a week income and other orgs 
high pay.

I have developed programs to help. For instance all SH
taught processes can be used. Small package sales (like a
L22 5 hour intensive) enormously assist small orgs. 
Dianetics and its multitude of uses in healing can be
worked hard.

When I hear of Scn org staffs low paid or unpaid I tend to
get upset. Because there's no reason for it at all.

The following is needed:

A coordination amongst orgs in the UK and Anzo.

A well established and understood flow cycle.

Lots of org auditors being made.

No backlogs ever.

Small cost packages of auditing (like L22 less discounts)
for specific ailments.

A scholarship permitting a O-IV Scn speed training in
grades in Academies for L125.

The broad theory and thousands of processes taught on the SHSBC.

Dianetic Courses running all over the place and in all orgs
and HDG in orgs.

Low level (HAS, HQS, PE) Courses running in orgs Coaudits
and Group Auditing done in orgs.

All orgs depend on WW's defenses. Thus the support should
be on service lines not percentages.

You can, in ECs, do any of this on your own.

But I want to see from every EC involved a list of what
stops exist. And when you have found them, just abolish
them. Don't wait for me to tell you to sit down or stand up.

I want to see the UK and Anzo orgs cooperating and a cycle
flowing where groups and franchises move people to lower
orgs and lower orgs move people in and move them on up to
SH UK and SH supporting WW which in turn supports and
defends all orgs.

Anything that bends this flow out of line or stops it must
be abolished.

Given books being sold in the field, given lots of Dianetic
Courses being taught in the field, given lots and lots of
Dianetic auditing going on in the field, given orgs pushing
the FSM program each one for itself, given orgs in UK and
Anzo organized and cooperating as in this ED, you have a
boom, not in the making but in progress.

Each org pushes people on up to SH and SH supports WW and
WW uses funds to defend all orgs

Bridging from Dianetics to Scn is not any big hump if FSMs
are working.

The boom is available but YOU have to make it happen. It is
up to YOU to produce it.

Love,

Ron

L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:fw


===========================
367 ED 20 WW 21 Jan 70 SH Auditing Hours
[p. 637-8]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 20 WW 4 SH 3 SH FDN 21 January 1970

To: EC WW EC SH All Staff WW & SH


SH Auditing Hours


I have just seen the SH and SH Fdn stats for their Div IVs
for 16 Jan 70.

I can't believe it.

SH Fdn Jan 15 - hrs of successful auditing for the week - 5

SH Day Jan 15 - hrs of successful auditing - 35.

Qual income SH Day and SH Fdn are both very small.

In DC in the late 50s, not a large org and much smaller
than SH, Div IV delivered from 80 to 100 hrs of auditing a DAY.

On Flag just taking care of the ship we deliver as much
auditing in 2/3rds of a day as SH and SH Fdn deliver in a week.

With over a hundred people around at SH and WW it should
require over 100 hrs a week in winter just to take care of
the current aches, pains and sniffles of staff!

So I don't believe these graphs as no Scn org would ever
deliver as little as that. The smallest org in the world
delivers more, far more.

SH AND SH FDN MUST TAKE LRH ED 75 INT, Use of Auditing,
etc. TO HEART and get it in, in, in, in!

Now I'm not cross with anyone. All I'm trying to
communicate is this:

AS THE WORLD'S SENIOR ORG YOU MUST GET BUSY AUDITING.

I imagine there's some rule that staff has to pay for its
auditing. This you had better abolish. Contracted staff
deserves auditing.

Day staff gets Foundation auditing, Fdn staff gets day auditing.

But in any event you have to get auditing going. If you
have auditors you keep them busy. You feed in staff pcs to
make up auditing time.

When you have too many public pcs you grab any and all
auditors in the org for a part time auditing day.

If you train up staff auditors you don't charge them, you
get them on contract and they sign undated notes in case
they don't finish their contract. But you train up auditors!

Anyone on SH or SH Fdn staff should be an HDC or near it by
now. For staff only consider that as arequisite to the
SHSBC and let them have their SHSBC Class VI Training.

Also get internes.

I guarantee that if SH and SH Fdn have a lot of auditors in
Tech and Qual and if they are kept busy, whether on staff
or the public you will attract business like a magnet. GET
AUDITING BEING DONE.

If you have some idea that a pc can only have Dn and Scn
Triples and that's it, get rid of it. A pc before Power or
after can absorb a hundred or more hours easily.

Push short intensives.

Get your Health Crusade going.

Get local residents well.

Get some friendly doctors to send their "bizarre aches and
pains" cases to you for free as a favour to the doctor.

All this develops paying pcs.

Get auditors off Admin posts and skim your Admin Tech ratio
down. Those who aren't auditors and are still in excess,
put them on full time training fast.

When your day org stats gets to 500 Hours delivered a week
and your foundation 200 Hours, you will just be beginning
to get into stride.

Get rid of the arbitraries and get auditing being done.

If you have a lot of auditors to keep busy - as well as
lots of students to train - the PES SH and SH Fdn will have
to step very lively to get enough paying pcs to keep them busy.

As the most senior Scn Org in the world, you MUST set an example.

GET BUSY.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:gal


===========================
368 ED 76 INT 26 Jan 70 1969 DOWNSTAT CORRECTIONS
[p. 505-7]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 76 INT 26 January 1970

To ECs All Orgs 
To All Staff


1969 DOWNSTAT CORRECTIONS


In 1969 several actions contributed to low stats.


TRIPLE PRICING

Scn Triples were not quickly or realistically priced.

Triple grades or Triple Flow Dn should be twice the price
of single grades or single flow Dianetics.

In this way, singles can be and should be sold. An equal
amount can then be charged for the remaining 2 flows.

When Dn Triples or Scn Triples are sold as an original
package, they should be twice as much as singles used to be.

While pricing should be a local matter, it became set by
Policy when some misguided areas lowered prices to a point
of local insolvency.

One can always charge more than the required price.
Franchise and field are required to charge the same as orgs
but may charge more.


DN BEFORE SCN

2 PLs by someone else, now cancelled, required a person to
be audited on Dianetics before any Scn auditing. This is
contrary to the LRH ED saying don't drop any Scn action or
service. The only danger to orgs was that they went off
Scn usual actions. Requiring Dn auditing before Scn
auditing was a wild change and hit orgs hard.

They should have just gone on selling and auditing Scn as 
usual.

However, the Dn field boom has begun to flow back into
orgs.

The Dianetic boom should be reinforced in the field. Orgs
should do lots of HDG selling to HDC field graduates.

Also a scholarship for O-IV Scn training should be made
known to all Dn field grads. Everything above L125 or $500
is awarded as a scholarship to successful Dn HDCs.

We know who these field grads are because orgs issue the
certificates to field Dn graduates.

The Dn boom saved us in the long run but failure to carry
on with Scn as usual was hard on orgs.


AUDITOR SCARCITY

The Tech Admin ratio of orgs must never be more than 2
Admin to 1 Tech. As orgs increase in size (to 75 staff
members for instance) the ratio should tend toward 1 to 1.

One org was way out to 5 to 1, another 3.4 to 1.

Auditors were generally scarce in the Tech-Qual Divs in
orgs, even when they were on other posts.

Auditors in general became scarce.

The answer (as in Org Pgm No. 1) is to get the Tech Admin
ratio to 2 to 1 at once and shave it toward 1 to 1.

Those in excess on admin who are not auditors should be put
on full time training.

The action is MAKE AUDITORS. USE AUDITORS TO AUDIT. The
should be a very heavy push on this.

Any and all lack of pay in orgs comes from a failure to
heavily produce pc and student completions.

Backlogs of pcs in Tech or Qual are utterly unthinkable.
You just never have them. You produce.

The PES promotes and Registrars sign up without any regard
to the comfort of Tech or Qual. The OES copes. That's the
way it has always been. And never any backlogs.

One org had 70 pcs backlogged in their HGC! The auditors
were on Admin posts. There were only 3 auditors in Tech.
Those in Tech and &ual were not very competent in that org,
getting only 1 completion every 3 days! When jogged up on
their tech they began to get 3 completions every day.

An org is a pc-student factory. If no people are auditing
and training where's the pay going to come from?

Admin is there to get in and handle pcs and students and
keep the org safe and solvent.


ADMIN CHECKLIST

The various files - CF, address - and admin pieces of an
org should be kept in PT. A list of these is being made up.

However, an org that can't keep its internal admin up
wastes its customers madly.

In 1969, it was found that the CF and address functions in
orgs were generally not being kept up.


FINANCE

Financial Planning has been out in most orgs. Their
cash-bills ratio was worsened by great carelessness in
money handling. With down income expenses were neglected.

FP Prog. No. 1 lets an org get a start on solvency.

Having people in Finance or on EC posts who have not do the
finance pack - it is short - is suicidal to an org.


FSM

The FSM networks broke down in lesser orgs in 1969. One has
lots of FSMs and pays them promptly on selections.

Every org, big or small, should have FSMs.


FREELOADERS

A lot of orgs lost auditors they had trained. These went
to higher orgs or into Franchise or got training on a
promise to work in orgs.

This is being solved by requiring undated notes before
training people without charge to them. Makes them less
eager to break their contracts.


USES OF AUDITING

Auditing was not being given full use by the org.

These points were the major reasons for the stats of 1969.

I have issued a number of LRH EDs giving programs to remedy
some of these and other points.

If you get these Program No. Is in, which began with LRH ED
27 INT 20 September 69 LRH COMM STAFF PROG. NO. 1, you will
not only pull out of it, you will soar.

YOU SHOULD INFORM ME IF IN YOUR LOCAL AREA OTHER REASONS
EXISTED FOR 1969 STATS.

DUE TO THESE NO. 1 PROGRAMS GOING IN AND THE DETERMINATION
AND HARD WORK OF STAFFS, STATS ARE CURRENTLY RISING OVER
THE WORLD.

Love,

Ron


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
369 ED 77 INT 27 Jan 70 THURSDAY REPORTS
[p. 503-4]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 77 INT 27 January 1970

To: Every Staff Member

RE: THURSDAY REPORTS


Thank you for all your Thursday Reports. They help a great
deal, giving me a first hand view of what's going on in
your org. Keep them coming.


AUDITING MYSTERY

Here's something you can help me solve. I have no idea of
why such a tiny microscopic amount of auditing is being
done in some orgs.

Do you know of any reason, order, threat, rule, HCO P/L,
HCO B or idea that would be used to prevent auditing being
delivered to the public and staff?

When I see "5 hrs" as the weekly amount delivered by a
Foundation or "28 hours" as a weekly amount delivered by a
day org, I can't believe my eyes.

On Flag just to care for the people's health and grades, we
deliver 28 hours in half a day and we have no big auditing
staff. We deliver about 300 hours, not counting solo, a
week to 108 people, the number on staff, just to keep cases
moving technically, handle aches and pains and sniffles.

In Wash D.C. when MSH was D of P, we delivered 80 to 100
hours a day! In slack times!

So this is one awful screaming mystery to me. I don't know
how anyone can deliver the small amount of auditing I see
on the stats of some orgs.

If it's auditor scarcity then we have already ordered
excess admin staff (above 2 to 1) on full time training and
Staff Prog. No. 1 should have given you lots of HDCs to be
further trained.

But I still don't see why auditing isn't being delivered in
high quantities. It's not no pcs as one org had 70
backlogged! Another 150!

A backlog in Tech or Qual will very soon give you no pcs!
Who wants to wait. So that means no pay for staff, too. 
Backlogs are a wicked sin.

A staff auditor in HGC or Qual is expected to deliver 30
hours a week with pcs plus admin time to complete the
reports. It is up to the OES or Tech Services to tightly
schedule pcs to keep all auditors busy.

The only time I ever saw auditing hours fall in an org was
when the Registrar was scheduling pcs. The registrar would
ask the pc, "When do you want to be audited?" The pc would
say "Thursday nights" and the Registrar scheduled all pcs. 
The org had 35 auditors, some working only 2 1/2 hours a week!

It's up to the OES Tech and Qual to cope and schedule
without backlogging. The Registrar and PES simply cram pcs
at them and they MUST cope and must NOT BACKLOG. It's
quite a job for the Reg and PES to keep a dozen auditors
supplied with pcs.

There can be all sorts of reasons some orgs are delivering
low hours. Orders or conflicts of orders can cause it. 
I've run fresh out of guesses as to why and need help to
understand and remedy it.

Snoop around. Look. Find out why or what reason or order
could possibly exist for so few hours of auditing being
delivered.

Also please give me your idea of how to increase the number
of hours of auditing being delivered in your org after
you've looked into it.

An org depends for stable income in the main on fast
training, lots of students. But auditing MUST be delivered
by an org in quantity.

Love,

Ron

L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
370 ED 78 INT 28 Jan 70 SUMMARY OF INT NO. 1 PROGRAMS
[p. 500-2]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 78 INT 28 January 1970

To All Staff


SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF INT NO. 1 PROGRAMS

Synopses and Intentions


LRH COMM STAFF PROGRAMME NO. 1 

LRH ED 27 INT 20 SEPTEMBER, 1969

This is a plan to get all staff members up to HDC or HDG
and get them through the Org Exec Course. It is done by
part time training, the person carrying on his regular
staff job.

If staffs are all trained on the OEC it is very unlikely
that the org form and functions will go out.

Technical reality on the subject of auditing pcs is highly
desirable on the part of Admin staff.

This paves the way for better staff students to be pushed
through to Class IV full time.

It temporarily suspends working on Staff Status 0, I and
II, when we have lots of OEC trained people we can revert
to Staff Status training for newcomers.


ETHICS PROGRAM NO. 1


LRH ED 39 INT ETHICS PROGRAM NO. 1 23 NOV. '69

The purpose of this is to pick out AND ADD TO persons who
should have Ethics Protection because they are producers.


LRH ED 63 INT 16 DEC '69

This reassures people they can become Ethics Upstats and
not to be upset if not selected at once.


ED 52 INT 10 DEC, '69

An effort to get an LRH Comm on post in orgs, an Ethics
Officer and a Staff Training Officer.

The Assistant Guardian is exempted from the Tech Admin ratio.

See HCO PL 27 Jan 70 which shows how many should be in an
org before appointing an LRH Comm.

Even if an org only has 3 people it still has all these
posts, the HCOES being the LRH Comm and Ethics Officer in
addition to other duties and the OES holding the Staff
Training Officer function.


LRH ED 73 INT 9 JAN '70

The steps to take on those who didn't make Ethics Upstat,
to give them a chance to become Ethics Upstats.

The full intentions are to get Ethics in in Orgs, protect
Upstats and bring others up to Upstat by auditing and training.


ORGANIZATION PROGRAM NO. 1

LRH ED 49 INT 9 DEC '69

This is an effort to make it easy to reform an org whether
the org is large or small.

This gives how to attain your 2 Admin to 1 Tech ratio which
must not be exceeded.

If an org of any size is having any trouble operating, it
should carefully follow this ED.

If an org's Tech-Admin ratio is greater than 2 Admin to 1
Tech it will only be able to pay poorly and function badly.

This is all in policy. Here in Org Prog. No. 1 it is
condensed as a guide.

This ED is to be used to stabilise and establish a workable
org form which will produce with good GIs and pay.

Orgs which have more than 2 Admin to 1 Tech should take
from their excess Admin their best potential students and
full time train them to swell Tech ranks and increase
student-pc production.

Org duties and actions are clearly outlined in this Program.


SUPERIOR SERVICE IMAGE PROGRAM NO. 1

LRH ED 54 INT 10 DEC '69

Official orgs are really there to service groups, franchises 
and the public.

They are supposed to be sources of superior service. The
service must be superior to that available from groups,
franchises and field auditors and should help them, handle
their rough pcs and students and assist them to function.

An org isn't a competitor to groups, franchises and field
auditors. It is the unit to which these feed people and to
which those in the field look for help, data and training.

An org isn't just another Franchise.

It must be a snap and pop senior that knows its business
and does it.


LRH ED 66 INT 16 DEC '69

Instant Service Project is part of the Superior Org Image.

An org NEVER backlogs pcs or students. Never makes them
wait.

They sign up, they get service, no matter how that makes
the OES sweat and figure and juggle auditors and space.

An org can kill itself dead making anyone wait.


LRH ED 75 INT 17 JAN '70

Auditing isn't being used broadly enough to do enough for
people in orgs.

Three HCO Bs were written to put this across.

Signing up a pc for "Dn Triples" and "Scn Triples" and
calling it handling cases is nonsense. There is enough to
audit on one.

All Class VI processes can now be used (a) if they read and
(b) if they are run only to F/N. This gives orgs thousands
of processes to run in addition to grades to handle
specific complaints.

We can keep a pc going for 100 hours just using Dianetics
and Class VIII Scn actions. Class VI is in addition to this.

Recent findings are that the small number of hours being
delivered by orgs (despite huge backlogs) shows orgs
deficient in scheduling pcs and deficient in rendering
service. This must be handled fast as a gross outness.

An org is a pc-student factory.


FINANCIAL PLANNING PROGRAM NO. 1

LRH ED 55 INT 10 DEC '69

Survival of an org depends on solvency.

Solvency depends on making more than it spends.

This ED is a clever one actually written by MSH. She said,
"IF they will just do this ED they will become solvent." 
It's true.

It is very important to staffs that Financial Planning be
done well as if it isn't, it threatens their pay as well as
the org's survival.


LRH ED 74 INT 14 JAN '70

This reinforces the data of solvency and Financial Planning.

The above are the key programs being pushed by me and have
already accounted for general world stat increases.

If we keep working on these things all will be well.

Love,

Ron


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
371 ED 79 INT 30 Jan 70 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROGRAMME NO. 1 ADDITION
[p. 499]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 79 INT 30 January 1970 
Reissued 
To: All Exec Sees 12 April 1982 
Deputy Guardians for Finance 
Treasury Secs


FINANCIAL PLANNING PROGRAMME NO. 1 ADDITION

(Adds to LRH ED 55 INT of Dec 10, 1969)


As a result of the one compliance report received with
regard to Financial Planning Programme No. 1, it is
absolutely necessary that this ED be issued to amplify the
previous ED 55 INT.

The one organization reporting compliance has an average
income of f3,500 per week, yet in doing FP Programme No. 1,
found that its operating costs, promotional costs, and
monies needed to pay sums due on writs against the
organization amounted to E5,800 per week, whereupon it was
gleefully decided that the organization would have to make
more income. Now this was not the whole intention of
Financial Planning Programme

In presenting Financial Planning Programme No. 1, it was
considered that the basic costs oi the organization would
be LESS than its income, but that such basic costs would
give the Executive Council an idea of how much they would
have to make to barely survive and every once in a great
while it would I require added effort by the organization
to pull Its income up to its bare existence level.

Therefore, the following is added to this programme:

1. After completing the actions listed in LRH ED 55 INT,
the average weekly income for the past four months is to be
calculated.

2. If the basic expenses of the organization are greater
than the average weekly income, the operational costs must
be reduced and the organizational expenses CUT BACK to a
figure below that of the average weekly income.

3. If the organization also has past bills owing, then
the organizational expenses must be CUT BACK even further
to permit past bills to be paid. At least 10% to 15% of
the average weekly income must be set aside to pay past due
bills and so the cut back in expenses must take this figure
into account.

If you have completed Financial Planning Programme No. 1,
immediately take the actions required in this ED and
resubmit your compliance report to LRH Comm WW with a copy
to the D/Guardian for Finance WW.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:ei:kJm
Copyright c 1970, 1982
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


===========================
372 ED 79 INT 4 Feb 70 MAJOR AUDITING ACTIONS
[p. 498]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 79 INT 4 February 1970

To: EC

Subject: MAJOR AUDITING ACTIONS

Reference: SUPERIOR SERVICE IMAGE PROG #1 LRH ED 54 INT
AUDITING LRH ED 67 INT 
USES OF AUDITING LRH ED 75 INT


I have just written HCO Pol Ltr 4 Feb 70 and HCO B 4 Feb
70. Both concern "PC APPLICATION FOR MAJOR AUDITING ACTIONS"

The PL is a form to be filled out by a pc and the HCO B is
how to use it.

I have found in some orgs that pcs are not being prepared
for Major Auditing Actions. The major action is simply
given. The result is bad results.

You need Dianetic Auditors, Class IVs and Class VIs on your
staff and a Class VIII Case Supervisor, no matter what
org you are.

Don't use HCO PL 4 Feb 70 as a broad field mailing piece
until you have such auditors on your Tech staff as you may
get swamped. Get the auditors auditing. Then you can use
HCO PL 4 Feb 70 as a broad mailing.

IT WOULD BE A TERRIFIC IDEA TO GET ALL STAFF CASES UP AND
SAILING. Then you'd have a broad org agreement on how much
auditing can be done on a case and how much auditing can do.

An excellent prelude to your broad mailing of HCO PL 4 Feb
70 would be

(1) Tech Div manned and operating

(2) Staff cases sailing.

And your staff members all through the OEC at least once
wouldn't hurt the action a bit.

The Superior Org Image means a lot of high quality tech
delivery. A lot of experience on preparing cases to fly.

Love

RON


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:sk


===========================
373 ED 80 INT 5 Feb 70 ORGANIZATION AND INCOME
[p. 496-7]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 80 INT 5 February 1970

To: ECs

All Staff

Subject: ORGANIZATION AND INCOME

Reference: LRH ED 49 INT 9 Dec 69 ORG PROG. NO. 1 LRH ED
27 INT 20 Sep 69 LRH COMM STAFF PROG. NO. 1


Data is coming in which points to the urgent necessity of
training up executives and staff on the Org Exec Course.

A survey showed only 63 of 805 Scn org staff members had
done the OEC.

With this few people in orgs having the know-how to run
orgs, of course stats are down.

At least get your Execs and staff through the OEC one time 
through.

The outnesses reported in orgs are very big.

All this is covered in the OEC.

Org Prog. No. 1 LRH ED 49 INT will get an org running and
keep it there long enough to get it really trained up and
truly formed.

There is a definite and positive relationship between an
org being organized and its income.

There is a definite relationship between a staff that knows
its OEC and the income.

Without organization, an org can't expand and is very
liable to go broke.

The No. 1 Programs should be driven in hard hard hard by
the Executive Secretaries.

You haven't got all that time.

Get organized, get busy auditing and training with both
Dianetics and Scientology and get all staff members really
up on their OEC and get the show on the road.

Sea Org Missions and Guardian actions are moving out over
the world to get these No. 1 Programs known and in action
in even the smallest orgs.

Your Gross Divisional Statistics are being watched at WW,
at the Sea Org and in every Guardian Office.

The name of every Exec Sec and Secretary is appended to
these stats at WW, in Guardian Offices and in every ship
and base of the Sea Org. I see these stats and these names
regularly. All these command points run by stats observed.
Every person in them expects these GDS stats to go UP.

It is important, it is urgent. It is watched.

Where GDS stats remain low, there is a conviction that the
Exec Sec or Secretary isn't driving, that the org is not
well organized, and direct observation bears this out.

Get organized, get busy. Don't let the side down. And
don't let others let it down. We have a planet to win.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:bk


===========================
374 ED 84 INT 8 Feb 70 1969 LRH EDs
[p. 485]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 84 INT 8 February 1970


1969 LRH EDs


LRH EDs issued in 1969 remain in force throughout 1970.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
375 ED 85 INT 12 Feb 70 CURRENT ACTIONS
[p. 483-4]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 85 INT 12 February 1970

To: All Staff

Subject: CURRENT ACTIONS

Reference: LRH EDs 69/70


I thought you would like to know what is being pushed hard
at the top.

What we are trying to do just at this time can be
summarized rather briefly:

1. We are pushing to get EDs, PLs and HCO Bs rapidly
released and into the hands of every staff member in every org.

2. A mimeo or photo-lithe machine in every org is a target.

3. We are completing the master books of policy letters as
rapidly as possible and they are being issued one book at a
time.

4. Auditor training is being shoved on hard.

5. Basic org form and function is being stressed, getting
a 2 to 1 or better Admin Tech ratio.

6. We are trying to get the volume of auditing of the
public greatly increased in every org and pushing up
student training.

7. There is heavy emphasis on getting all staffs audited.

8. The expense-income ratio of every org is being pushed
into line.

9. We are trying to get every Staff Member up to Ethics 
Upstat.

10. Public Divisions are being guided into standard
promotion to pull in lots and lots of new names for CF.

11. Tech, Qual backlogs are being cleaned up fast and
further backlogs of pcs forbidden.

12. We are trying to improve the appearance and service
image of orgs.


No. 1 Programs

All these and other points are covered in the No. 1
Programs appearing in LRH EDs.


New EC WW

There is a new EC WW and it is doing well and it and
Continental ECs are being backed up hard by the SO.

We are refining the command and comm lines.

The next actions after the above will be getting good HCOs
in in every org, which is already taking place in some
orgs.

With the points above stressed, there is the continual
action along all divisional lines to get the stats up.

The efforts put in so far have already raised the stats in
most places.

We are building very strongly now and what goes in will 
stay in.

It is our full intention to strengthen and expand every org
over the world and take over completely and utterly the
entire field of mental healing.

Step by step, point by point we will strengthen our orgs,
smooth out the comm and command lines, exert total PRO Area
Control around each org and, working thoroughly and
carefully, win the future for this planet.

We have a long way to go. Step by step, we will make it.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
376 ED 22 WW 12 Feb 70 ETHICS IN ORGS WW ACTIONS
[p. 631-2]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 22 WW 12 February 1970

To: EC WW

All Staff WW

Subject: ETHICS IN ORGS WW ACTIONS

Reference: HCO PL 12 Feb 70


What I want you to get solidly in is that the cycle of
attention in management is


ETHICS

TECH

ADMIN


We have found the whole mimeo - ED - PL - HCO B network was
out. I have written HCO PL 12 Feb 70 to assist getting it
in.

I have your report on London. You did well.


But you omitted one thing - Ethics. Therefore, I can
predict that all your actions there will "mysteriously"
fade in a few weeks.


WHO in London was obstructing this line by negligence or
outright willfulness. For whoever obstructs the ED PL HCO B 
line will also fail to make materials available and will
obstruct all dissemination. It is an important indicator 
of the suppression of materials.

I have been saying to various people for about 5 months 
YOU HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED. This means people have been 
put in on your lines.

A whole network of orgs cannot by itself disintegrate in
only a year and a half. It needs a lot of help. 
Foolishness and mistakes account for some of it. But OUT
ETHICS is present as the big factor.


On EC UK or EC LND it required active resistance to
prevent the distribution. You will find this to be the
case in each point of breakdown. By locating this, you
also locate why stats are down in those areas.

The DC situation just handled by OTL NY is interesting. A
whole chain of SP Execs came out of Eleanor Turner (HCO ES
1960 on). They blew the engram and started to live. 
Turner actually turned the DC mail list over to
Amprinistics! And that bunch mailed to it and ARC broke 
the field.

When you put Wolhuter or Wolf hunter on as PES AF he at
once changed several orgs to Pub Div Orgs and crashed their
stats. You see it in the graph. I knew he did something!
Then I found what he did. I wondered if EC WW would catch
it - new appointee, weeks of crashed stats. This was
accidentally cancelled by the Dec Class of Orgs FL.

You are chiefly and mainly in the business at WW of EC
personnel. Are your Ethics files adequate? Do you watch
all GDS graphs?

Your first job now is to get EDs and PLs and HCO Bs into
the hands of every staff member in the world.

In doing that FIND WHO DIDN'T and get him off your lines as
such will not disseminate Dn or Scn either.

We are building orgs. If we leave dead heads, SPs or
infiltrators in these orgs unmolested, they won't rebuild.
And they must be rebuilt.

Ethics comes before Tech. Tech comes before Admin.

Get in Ethics at the top and get Tech being done in volume.
Then Admin will go in, we can put in HCOs and get sailing.

You should have a program cycle for each org like this for
WW action:

1) Ethics in at the top.

2) Tech in volume.

3) Build an HCO.

4) Build Public Divs.

When you accomplish (1) for that org, push (2) for that
org, etc. Then, providing you are very alert on your EC
appointees, the orgs will stay there with high stats.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
377 ED 83 INT 17 Feb 70 STAT RECOVERY, AN ANALYSIS OF BROAD OUTNESSES
[p. 486-8]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 83 INT 17 February 1970

To: ECs All Staff All Orgs

Subject: STAT RECOVERY
AN ANALYSIS OF BROAD OUTNESSES


As further observation is available it becomes very
apparent why International Stats declined and how they 
are being made to recover rapidly.


Inter Org Comm

The comm lines amongst orgs were permitted to become
nonfunctional. Orgs went out of comm with Continental and
WW. This became very apparent recently when it was found
that LRH EDs could not be distributed to every staff member
in the world.

Thus no real data, vital to management, was available and
unreal orders could result from Continental and WW.

The remedies under way for this are:

A. Conversion of the LRH Comm line network into the
network of comm between orgs, Continental ECs and WW and so
observation and compliance can occur.

B. Permitting orgs to re-mimeo materials received such as
LRH EDs, HCO Bs and PLs. Curing any backlog of mimeo.

C. Speeding up all comm lines.


Auditing Delivery

Scn Orgs have had the advantage over other Earth activities
of having brighter staffs. People who are audited have
higher IQs and are more effective and have better judgment.

Somehow, auditing volume delivered was permitted to drop. 
Public pc backlogs piled up. Auditors were on Admin posts.
A scarcity of auditors developed. And contracted staff
members were not even audited when charged for it.

It actually is possible now to audit a pc hundreds of
hours. It is also the amount of auditing received rather
than just grades which pushes IQ and ability out the top.

If orgs had ceased to audit their staff members, they were
losing a definite advantage, as orgs, of having brighter,
better people.

This is being remedied by:

(a) Crash programming auditor training to get lots and lots
and lots of auditors in orgs.

(b) Pushing Admin-Tech ratio to 2 to 1 or better and
training any admin excess personnel up as auditors fast
fast fast.

(c) Recruiting for staff members from Academies and courses
and for staff and pushing their auditor training, if not
full time at least part time.

(d) Pushing in hard the HDG data on training in every org
so tight scheduling and good 8C results in fast training.

(e) Developing and giving Student Rescue Intensives to
speed learning rate.


Org Know How

Our Orgs long had an advantage of being better organized
and faster moving than other Earth Organizations. They had
very advanced organizational technology in which the
natural laws of organization had been isolated.

But with only 8% of staff members over the world who had
been once through the Org Exec Course, with policy and
divisional policy packs unavailable, this organizational
advantage was thrown away.

I have always worked on the basis that every staff member,
no matter how minor a post, must know all there is to know
about the organization and its policies. I frown on having
an expert or two at the top who are the only ones who
know. You can't have a team where 7/8ths of those on it
are in ignorance of what the team is trying to do. That's
more like the army than an org!

Such a condition, all by itself, will slow an org down to a
crawl because it piles up tons of misunderstoods daily. It
causes excessive blows and crashes stats.

This is being remedied by:

1. Getting current EDs, HCO Bs and Pol Ltrs into the
hands of every staff member.

2. Turning out full, printed HCO Pol Ltr packs for
individual purchase.

3. Turning out divisional summaries so even a new division 
staff member can be briefed quickly on his division.

4. Making the Org Exec Course a requirement for full pay
on the post.

5. Smoothing out any conflicts that have grown up in
policy matters.

6. Getting all orgs onto standard org form and actions
being done by an informed and knowledgeable staff.

Stats went down because our advantages of good between org
lines, well-audited staffs and well informed staff members
somehow became neglected in Scientology orgs.

In the same year and a half period, the SO orgs, where
these three things get heavy attention, continued to prosper.

These three things went out because of losses of trained
staff to Franchise etc. but mainly because WE FAILED TO
RECRUIT AND TRAIN AS RAPIDLY AS WE EXPANDED.

Wherever we get these things in in an Scn Org, it
immediately starts to raise its stats.

The LRH ED No. 1 Programs contain these elements, amongst 
others.

A staff member really has 3 hats - and used to each keep up
3 folders.

(1) Post Hat, in which the person's hat write-up by
outgoing persons, PLs of the post and the data about the
post were kept.

(2) Staff hat, in which material concerning one's duties as
a staff member were kept, plus new EDs and PLs.

(3) Tech hat, in which the HCO Bs relating to the post or
newly issued were kept.

These three hats should be in the possession of every staff
member and are inspected for by the HCO Area Sec.

We are working hard to remedy these matters.

There is exactly no reason why a staff member in an Scn Org
cannot do better than he ever would in Franchise.

I estimate that the GI stats of any Scn org are about
1/250th currently of what they will be if the No. 1
Programs are gotten in, if the above three situations are
fully corrected and if staffs produce. And the 1/250th is
a conservative estimate.

You cannot have a total monopoly in the effective mental
tech of a planet, rivals or no rivals, without eventually
clearing the planet. But you have to communicate, use it
and apply it!

I hope this analysis of the situation is of help.

Love,

Ron


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
378 ED 82 INT 18 Feb 70 ORG EXEC COURSE PASS
[p. 489]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 82 INT 18 February 1970

To: All Staff 
STO Hat 
LRH Comm Hat 
C & A Hat

From: Ron

Subject: ORG EXEC COURSE PASS

Reference: LRH ED 27 INT 1969 LRH COMM STAFF PROGRAM NO. 1 


Modifying earlier requirements for a completion on the 
ORG EXEC COURSE:

If a staff member after one time through the materials 
(including all PLs up to 31 Dec 69) can pass an examination 
84% he can be given a completion on the Org Exec Course.

The Examination given must be composed by the Qual Sec who 
must attest the questions were unknown to the student. 
The exam must consist of 50 questions of a non-controversial 
nature, each one counting 2 points.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
379 ED 87 INT 21 Feb 70 CHECKOUT ON F/N AND END PHENOMENA
[p. 482]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 87 INT 21 February 1970

To: LRH Comm 
OES 
Qual Sec 
Tech Sec 
All Auditors

Subject: CHECKOUT ON F/N AND END PHENOMENA

Reference: LRH ED 54 INT "SUPERIOR SERVICE IMAGE PROGRAM
NO. 1" HCO B 20 FEBRUARY 70 "FLOATING NEEDLES AND END
PHENOMENA"


Your attention is called to new data on how to handle
F/Ns.

The LRH Comm is to be sure the HCO B "Floating Needles and
End Phenomena" is

(a) rapidly available to all auditors and is

(b) placed in all Dn and Scn study packs and

(c) checked out on all HGC and Qual Auditors.

The OES is to make certain this HCO B is known and taught 
and used.

This HCO B, if studied and used by org auditors, will
greatly improve auditing results.


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
380 ED 88 INT 26 Feb 70 STANDARD TECH AND INVALIDATION
[p. 480-1]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 88 INT 26 February 1970

To: Every Class VIII Every Class VIII Course Supervisor in
an AO (Hat) Every staff auditor in an org Franchise All FSMs

From: Ron

Subject: STANDARD TECH AND INVALIDATION

Reference: HCO B 26 FEB 70 "STANDARD TECH AND INVALIDATION" 
LRH ED 54 INT "SUPERIOR SERVICE IMAGE PROG. NO. 1"


It has come to my attention that some auditors in orgs and
the field have felt or been invalidated by Class VIIIs and
Standard Tech. This is very far from the intention.

Standard Tech is a way of auditing and C/Sing as covered in
the above HCO B and in VIII materials.

You audit by the rules, by the Auditor's Code, with TRs in, 
etc.

Standard Tech isn't a process or a series of processes.
It's how to make auditing work.

Any auditor now can audit any processes or level for which
he has been trained.

There are no texts or books banned by Standard Tech. It
outlawed no processes.

Any process ever published is valid if (a) It reads on
asking its question and (b) Is run to F/N and End Phenomena.

If you felt invalidated by Standard Tech or if you were
invalidated for auditing materials for which you were
trained, please advise me and say WHO.

Take the lid off. VIII is a way to get results. An VIII
can help you do that without making you an VIII.

VIII is the top class of auditor. But being an auditor at
all makes you among the top class of beings.

By all means eventually become an VIII. But meanwhile use
what you know and audit up to the level for which you have
been trained, even on HGC pcs. The VIIIs are there to help
you get results.

Love,

Ron


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
381 ED 89 INT 1 Mar 70 RECRUIT!
[p. 477-9]

L. Ron Hubbard EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE

LRH ED 89 INT 1 March 1970

To: HCO ES (Hat) 
HCO Area Sec (Hat) 
Director of RAP Dept 1 (Hat) 
Info all staff

From: Ron

Subject: RECRUIT!

Reference: HCO Pol Ltr 1 March 1970 "STAFF APPLICATION
FORM" LRH ORG PROG. NO. 1 LRH ED 49 INT 9 DEC 69


Two and a half years before the 1968 slump we had a very
heavy recruitment program and 2 1/2 year contracts. People 
on staff got Power if contracted.

Your income is directly proportional to the number of
trained auditors and sharp Course Supervisors you have on
staff. These determine the number of admin staff you have.

You must go all out to train auditors and supervisors while
maintaining income enough to make you solvent.

It simply doesn't matter how many auditors you train for
staff. The economics of it will work out. So long as they
are contracted you will be all right.

You will find that you lose them to admin and Exec posts.
The normal route to Execs is via the HGC and Academy.

In the past, people usually paid for their courses and then
decided to come on staff. However, so long as you can keep
your income up, this is not important.

Lots of auditors and auditing is real wealth in an org.
Income will follow as it's quite a stunt keeping a lot of
HGC auditors busy. (It is not done by auditing less than
30 hours a week per auditor as some Tech Services try to
do.) Finding pcs for a crowd of HGC auditors auditing 30
hours a week each keeps the Pub Divs and Dissem on its toes.

Fast, sharp Course Supervisors who don't take 4 months to
make an HDC or six months for an HPA are jewels and greatly
help this program.

You need staff. You need trained staff. You need
auditors. You need them in the org. You need them out in
the field.

So now a lot of ex staff is in the field and in many areas
Franchise is booming. Orgs that are good get fat on their
rough cases and the new auditors they want trained in Scn
as well as people from the public.

So the thing to do is recruit staff and make auditors and
supervisors.

(1) In your public course area you should have a sign
inviting org staff member applications, contracted or not.

(2) In your Academy or training area, you should have a
recruitment sign.

(3) Staff Application forms should also be posted (HCO PL 1
March 1970).

Anyone contracting to come on staff must sign a note. If
he gets his service and then blows, as some freeloaders
have, you present the note to an attorney for collection. 
Each new service he gets requires as part of it a new note
of hand.

When his contract is complete, mark his notes paid and return 
them.

If he goes to a higher org to be trained for you, it is on
a new note and a new 5 year contract that begins when he
resumes work in the org. The old 2 1/2 year contract is 
torn up as completed but the notes stand until the 5 year
contract is complete.

As long as you keep 2:1 Admin Tech ratio (closer to 1:1) 
you'll be in clover. The hottest SO Org there is is
totally composed of trained auditors, Admin-Tech is 1:1 and
its stats soar. It even has auditors on all its Admin
posts. If you train hard and fast that's what happens. 
First you only have auditors in Tech and Qual with
non-auditors on Admin. But as you train staff and recruit
and train you get nearer to auditors on all posts.


Power

Any VIII or VII can run Power on a contracted staff member
but not on the public in outer orgs.

Most orgs have VIIs or VIIIs.

(Be sure they have a new Power HCO B 21 February 70 they
can get from their SH Qual Sec before they begin to do
Power again.)


Divisional Actions

If you can get each Division humming, you will have lots to
cover costs of such extensive recruitment and training.


Keep It Up

Don't slack off again in recruitment and training for
staffs. Staff losses, even on completed contracts, are
fairly high. Usually the real good ones stay on and wind
up. But there is a fairly heavy turnover in the natural
course of things.

Expansion was a big factor in staff losses. They went to
higher orgs and new orgs. We must have 150 top liner ex
org staff members in the Sea Org for whom we are now
recompensing at 2 courses for 1 on any incomplete
contracts. But most had already completed their contracts.

Franchise is full of people who completed org contracts and
some who didn't and are now being billed.

Ex org staff members turn up in big companies also.

So our staff losses in completed contracts must be
recruited for heavily.

It takes a while to make a top grade staff member - lots of
training and auditing. So we've got to get ahead of this
and stay ahead of it for we're still expanding like mad!

Love,

Ron


L. RON HUBBARD 
Founder

LRH:jz:gal


===========================
